taxonID	type	description	language	source
A11387B0FF89FFDFFF5C25BEFDC9FC8B.taxon	description	(Figs 1 – 5, 8 – 43)	en	Roháček, Jindřich (2022): The true identity of Periscelis winnertzii and description of P. laszloi sp. nov. from Europe (Diptera: Periscelididae). Acta Entomologica Musei Nationalis Pragae 62 (2): 301-323, DOI: 10.37520/aemnp.2022.018, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.37520/aemnp.2022.018
A11387B0FF89FFDFFF5C25BEFDC9FC8B.taxon	materials_examined	Type material. Periscelis winnertzii Egger. LECTOTYPE (here designated): sex unknown (probably female), labelled: “ Winnertzii [handwritten], det. Schiner ” [printed] (pale brown label); “ Austria [handwritten], Alte Sammlung ” [printed]; “ Type ” [printed] (red label); “ Periscelis (Periscelis) winnertzii Egger, 1862, sex?, J. Roháček det. 2018 “ and “ LECTOTYPUS, Periscelis Winertzii Egger, 1862, J. Roháček des. 2018 ” (red label) (see Figs 3, 4). The specimen is heavily damaged by Anthrenus larvae (their setae are visible on specimen, cf. Fig. 2), with ventral part of head, ventral and some left lateral sclerites of thorax and entire abdomen missing (Figs 1, 2) but left fore leg is glued on label “ Austria, Alte Sammlung ” (NHMW, examined). Periscelis fugax Roháček & Andrade. HOLOTYPE: ♂, labelled: “ PORTUGAL: Porto: Valongo, Valongo, 41 ° 09 ′ 33.4 ″ N, 8 ° 29 ′ 05.6 ″ W, 50 – 100 m, R. Andrade leg. ”, “ 10. x. 2011, sweeping over bark of Quercus trees with sap runs ”, “ Holotypus J, Periscelis (P.) fugax sp. n., J. Roháček & R. Andrade det. 2016 ” (red label) and “ Periscelis (Periscelis) winnertzii Egger, 1862, ♂, J. Roháček det. 2022 ” (SMOC, intact, examined, Fig. 10). PARATYPES: 9 ♂♂ 10 ♀♀, same data as for holotype (4 ♂♂ 4 ♀♀ including 1 ♂ 1 ♀ with genit. prep. SMOC; 2 ♂♂ 2 ♀♀ NMPC; 3 ♂♂ 4 ♀♀ in RAP); 1 ♀ with same data but collected 26. ix. 2011 (RAP); 6 ♂♂ with same data but collected 1. x. 2011 (3 ♂♂ SMOC, 3 ♂♂ / 1 ♂ genit. prep. / RAP); 7 ♂♂ 2 ♀♀ with same data but collected 4. x. 2011 (4 ♂♂ SMOC, 3 ♀♀ / 1 ♀ genit. prep. / RAP); 8 ♂♂ 4 ♀♀ with same data but collected 14. x. 2011 (2 ♂♂ 2 ♀♀ / 1 ♂ 1 ♀ genit. prep. / SMOC, 6 ♂♂ 2 ♀♀ RAP); PORTUGAL: Bragança: Bragança, Parâmio, Parque Natural de Montesinho, 41 ° 53 ‘ 54.0 ‘‘ N, 6 ° 51 ‘ 16.3 ‘‘ W, 780 m, 21. vi. 2015, sweeping over bark of Quercus trees with sap runs, 1 ♂, R. Andrade leg. (RAP); Portalegre: Marvão, Santa Maria de Marvão, 39 ° 23 ‘ 50.2 ‘‘ N, 7 ° 21 ‘ 52.3 ‘‘ W, 616 m, 21. ix. 2014, sweeping over bark of Quercus pyrenaica trees with sap runs, 1 ♂ 1 ♀, Ana Gonçalves leg. (ARGC); all specimens in SMOC and NMPC dried from ethanol and mounted on pinned triangular cards, those in RAP and ARGC retained in ethanol. CZECH REPUBLIC: C. Bohemia: Roztoky, Tiché údolí, Roztocký háj (5852), 50 ° 8 ‘ 47.5 ‘‘ N, 14 ° 23 ‘ 10.1 ‘‘ E, beer trap, 2. – 10. ix. 2009, 1 ♂, J. Preisler leg. (SMLC); Český kras PLA, Na Voskopě res., 49 ° 54 ‘ 25 ‘‘ N, 14 ° 04 ‘ 05 ‘‘ E, beer trap, oak-hornbeam forest, 16. ix. – 2. x. 2016, 1 ♀, P. Heřman leg. (JMB); S Moravia: Podyjí NP, Liščí skála, 48 ° 49 ‘ 52 ‘‘ N, 15 ° 56 ‘ 35 ‘‘ E, 410 m, Quercetum, Malaise trap, 3. viii. – 9. ix. 2004, 1 ♀, 9. ix. – 28. x. 2004, 6 ♂♂ 7 ♀♀, M. Barták & Š. Kubík leg. (2 ♂♂ 4 ♀♀ MBP; 2 ♂♂ 2 ♀♀ / 1 ♂ genit. prep. / SMOC; 1 ♀ JMB); Podyjí NP, Fládnická chata, 48 ° 48 ‘ 42 ‘‘ N, 15 ° 58 ‘ 03 ‘‘ E, 360 m, forest, 9. ix. – 28. x. 2004, Malaise trap, 2 ♂♂, M. Barták & Š. Kubík leg. (MBP); Podyjí NP, Havrarníky, 48 ° 48 ‘ 52 ‘‘ N, 15 ° 59 ‘ 48 ‘‘ E, 330 m, forest- - steppe, 1. – 24. vii. 2002, Malaise trap, 1 ♀, O. Meixnerová leg. (MBP); Podyjí NP, Vraní skála, 48 ° 51 ‘ 03 ‘‘ N, 15 ° 53 ‘ 42 ‘‘ E, 390 m, mixed wood, 8. vii. – 28. x. 2003, Malaise trap, 1 ♂, O. Meixnerová leg. (JMB); all dried from ethanol and mounted on triangular cards. All paratypes with yellow label “ Paratypus ♂ (or ♀), Periscelis (P.) fugax sp. n., J. Roháček & R. Andrade det. 2016 ” and most of them also with white label “ Periscelis (Periscelis) winnertzii Egger, 1862, ♂ (or ♀), J. Roháček det. 2022 ”. Other material examined. SWITZERLAND: TI 701.168 113.372, Losone: Arcegno, Collina di Maia, Castagneto con querce, 419 m, prd. 28, vino bianca [white wine trap], ARC 2, 23. viii. – 7. xi. 2017, 13 ♂♂ 13 ♀♀, L. Pollini P. & M. Abderhalden leg. (all dried from ethanol, SMOC); 1 ♀ (SMOC, body after DNA extraction preserved in a pinned microvial in glycerine, with blue label: JR 34, ON 637245); same locality data and method but prd. 8, 9. – 23. x. 2015, 1 ♂, L. Pollini P. & M. Abderhalden leg. (MCSN). SLOVAKIA: S. Slovakia: Cerová vrchovina PLA, Hajnáčka-Gortva 0.9 km E, Steblová skala res., 240 m, 48 ° 14 ‘ 51 ‘‘ N, 19 ° 58 ‘ 12 ‘‘ E, beer trap, 27. ix. – 1. xi. 2017, 1 ♀, J. Roháček, J. Ševčík & M. Tkoč leg. (SMOC); Cerová vrchovina PLA, Hajnáčka-Buková 0.4 km NNE, 48 ° 13 ′ 39 ″ N, 19 ° 58 ′ 25 ″ E, 375 m, beer trap, 12. ix. – 11. x. 2018, 3 ♂♂ 1 ♀, J. Roháček, J. Ševčík & M. Tkoč leg. (SMOC, 1 ♂ genit. prep.); Cerová vrchovina PLA, Gemerský Jablonec-Vodokáš 0.5 km N, 320 m, 48 ° 12 ‘ 47 ‘‘ N, 19 ° 59 ‘ 30 ‘‘ E, beer trap, 7. – 27. ix. 2017, 3 ♀♀, 27. ix. – 1. xi. 2017, 1 ♀; same locality, Malaise trap, 27. ix. – 1. xi. 2017, 1 ♀; all J. Roháček, J. Ševčík & M. Tkoč leg. (SMOC); Cerová vrchovina PLA: Jestice 1.3 km SSE, Hradisko Mt., 48 ° 12 ’ 31 ” N, 20 ° 03 ’ 39 ” E, 255 m, wine traps on Quercus cerris, 19. vii. – 17. viii. 2022, 4 ♂♂ 4 ♀♀, 17. viii. – 13. ix. 2022, 2 ♀♀, 13. ix. – 26. x. 2022, 2 ♀♀, J. Roháček leg. (2 ♂♂ 2 ♀♀ NMPC, 2 ♂♂ 6 ♀♀ SMOC). HUNGARY: Szokolya: Királyrét, Szénpatak, [larva] 23. v. 1996, reared from a wound of Quercus tree, [adult ♀ emerged] 13. vii. 1996, [L. Papp leg.], 1 ♀ with puparium originally glued to a card, now preserved in glycerine in a pinned microvial (HNHM); Szokolya, Vasfazék-v., Magas Tax alatt, 450 m, fekete tölgyfaseb, kifolyó nedvéről, 13. ix. 1997, 1 ♂ 6 ♀♀, L. & J. Papp leg. (HNHM, ♂ with terminalia lost). CROATIA: Oprtalj, 45.403 N, 13.842 E, 430 m, Swissino baited trap nr. bee hive, 10. ix. – 14. x. 2019, 1 ♂; Benčani, 45.283 N, 13.740 E, 269 m, Swissino baited trap nr. bee hive, 10. ix. – 15. x. 2019, 1 ♂, both B. Sladonia leg. (SMOC).	en	Roháček, Jindřich (2022): The true identity of Periscelis winnertzii and description of P. laszloi sp. nov. from Europe (Diptera: Periscelididae). Acta Entomologica Musei Nationalis Pragae 62 (2): 301-323, DOI: 10.37520/aemnp.2022.018, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.37520/aemnp.2022.018
A11387B0FF89FFDFFF5C25BEFDC9FC8B.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis. A rather large Periscelis (s. str.) species (Figs 10, 22) with body ca 2.4 – 3.8 mm long, sexually dichroic face (Figs 8, 9) and wing with cross-vein dm-cu developed but attenuated (or interrupted) by spurious vein in the middle. It is most similar to its closest relative P. laszloi sp. nov. (described below) but differs from the latter by a distinctly smaller black spot on antennal pedicel (not extended ventrally at anterior margin of its external side, see Figs 10, 11); mesonotum usually with a distinct pair of brown microtomentose elongate spots or vittae medially (Fig. 12); largely to entirely yellow scutellum (Fig. 12); wing with more extensive dark pattern (Figs 5, 10); suboblong male S 6 with brown lateral pigmentation and narrow medial depression (Fig. 20); surstylus with apex (albeit slender) blunt at tip (Figs 13, 14); gonostylus smaller and gradually tapering towards simple apex (Figs 13, 16); postgonite with dilated basal part being expanded posteroventrally (see Fig. 15, arrow); female T 8 brown pigmented (Fig. 26); female S 8 darkened brown at lateral and posterior margins (Fig. 27).	en	Roháček, Jindřich (2022): The true identity of Periscelis winnertzii and description of P. laszloi sp. nov. from Europe (Diptera: Periscelididae). Acta Entomologica Musei Nationalis Pragae 62 (2): 301-323, DOI: 10.37520/aemnp.2022.018, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.37520/aemnp.2022.018
A11387B0FF89FFDFFF5C25BEFDC9FC8B.taxon	description	Redescription. The species has been described in detail as Periscelis fugax by ROHÁĆEK & ANDRADE (2017: 234 – 240). Consequently, it is unnecessary to redescribe P. winnertzii here and only illustrations of diagnostic characters and, particularly, of structures of the male and female terminalia are presented to facilitate its safe identification (Figs 5, 8 – 29). However, some new information on the variability of some external morphological characters are given below. Variability. While the extent of the black spot on the pedicel seems to be relatively stable, the colouration of scutum and scutellum can vary. Although the scutellum is usually largely yellow and contrasting with adjacent part of scutum, it can be rarely ochreous or even brown darkened, particularly basally, exceptionally (1 ♀ from Switzerland, 1 ♂ from Slovakia) largely brown with only apex yellowish, thus most resembling that of P. laszloi sp. nov. Also the brown microtomentose vittae on mesonotum seem to be variable, both in length and distinctness. Moreover, immature adults and specimens faded due to preservation in alcohol or long stored in collections can have these colour characters obscured and sometimes cannot be identified safely. For these aberrant and / or faded specimens it is recommended to study structures of the male or female terminalia for safe identification. Preimaginal stages. Larva. Cephalopharyngeal (= head) skeleton of 3 rd instar larva (Figs 35 – 37) of saprophagous type, as known in the majority of other acalyptrate larvae, most resembling that of Periscelis (Myodris) annulata, described by PAPP (1988, 1995) and MATHIS & PAPP (1998). The paired mouthhooks (= mandibles) relatively large and long compared to other parts of skeleton (Fig. 36, mh); each laterally flattened, with simple, slightly bent distal hook, in the middle projecting ventrally as a blunt tooth (less strongly than in P. annulata), posteriorly widened (more distinctly laterally than dorsoventrally, cf. Fig. 37) and in lateral view somewhat incised (Figs 35, 36), all simply pigmented, gradually becoming paler distally. Dental sclerites (Figs 35, 36, ds) situated below mouthhooks at their posterior margin, small, rounded block-shaped, with slightly projecting ventral ends. No accessory oral sclerites. Intermediate (= hypostomal) sclerite (Figs 35 – 37, im) situated between mouthhooks and pharyngeal sclerite and clearly separate from both of them, strikingly short (markedly shorter than mouthhook and also shorter than that of P. annulata) and relatively broad, H-shaped in ventral view (Fig. 37), with connecting bridge-shaped part between lateral rods expanded ventrally (but less than in P. annulata). Epistomal plate flat (Fig. 37, es), elongately rounded subtriangular, pale-pigmented, between anterior arms of intermediate sclerite, with minute, closely attached oval? perforations in the middle (see Fig. 37). Pharyngeal sclerite (Fig. 35) elongate and relatively low. Its paired anterior projections (parastomal bars, pb) very slender, slighly bent and situated just above intermediate sclerite, each distally connected to posterodorsal end of mouthhook. Dorsal (dcr) and ventral (vcr) cornua of pharyngeal sclerite well developed. Dorsal cornu shorter, darker, only slightly tapered posteriorly and its end blunt (Fig. 35) in contrast to that of P. annulata. Dorsal cornua anterodorsally connected by rather unusual dorsal bridge (db) which is strikingly projecting dorsally and posteriorly, with dorsal side distinctly perforated (see Fig. 35). Also anteroventral part of dorsal cornu with distinctive structure and pigmentation. Ventral cornua longer and more robust (mainly posteriorly) than dorsal cornua, pale brown pigmented and posteriorly weakly sclerotized, longitudinally striated. Ventral trough, connecting ventral cornua, entirely membranous and very finely striated. Dorsal margin of posterior half of ventral cornu without dorsal apodeme, only slighly bulging (Fig. 35). Puparium (Figs 30 – 34) rather spindle-shaped than barrel-shaped, moderately elongate, distinctly wider than high but not dorsoventrally flattened, with more tapered anterior end and less narrowed and rounded posterior end (apart from larval posterior digitiform processes). Measurements (based on single female puparium examined): length 2.98 mm, maximum width 1.23 mm, maximum height 0.81 mm, maximum length of lateral process 0.13 mm, length of caudal process with posterior spiracle 0.28 mm. Integument of (empty) puparium ochreous yellow to ochreous brown (darker posteriorly), all surface finely and densely spinulose apart from being sparsely and finely transversely wrinkled. All thoracic and abdominal segments with lateral digitiform and spinose processes (= secondarily sclerotized fleshy processes of larva) and smaller bulbous projections (Figs 30, 33). Thus, larval characters are rather well preserved on puparium but modified by sclerotization of puparium. Segmentation of body more or less visible (Figs 30, 31). Anterior end of puparium (Figs 34, 38, 39) distinctly tapered but dorsoventrally flattened, equalling to thoracic (plus integrated cephalic) segments of larva. First visible segment (= cephalic + prothoracic part) laterally with (larval) anterior spiracles; each spiracle very small, short (Figs 38, 41), terminated in 3 bulbous papillae (hence different from that of larva of P. annulata having 4 or 5 papillae). First visible segment distinctly narrower but longer than 2 nd segment, anteromedially simple, rounded, dorsally (Fig. 38) and ventrally (cf. Fig. 39) only very finely wrinkled but densely spinose, with finest spinulae anteromedially, largest spinulae laterally. Dorsal side of first visible segment with cephalic part (Fig. 38, CP) flat, spinulose only at anterior margin and anteromedially, and with a pair of plain rounded areas; prothoracic part (Fig. 38, PR) with minute spinulae restricted to anterior submarginal area, otherwise with longer spines. Ventral side of first visible segment having in cephalic part distinctive dark palmately branched pigmentation (Fig. 39) obviously representing remnants of larval oral ridges; its prothoracic part characterized by fine transverse wrinkles, finely spinulose anteromedially and sparsely spinose in other areas except for the posteromedial part being finely tuberculate. Second (mesothoracic) segment dorsally (Fig. 38) sculptured and spinulose similarly as is foregoing segment but distinguished by medial semicircular incision of anterior margin. Third (metathoracic) segment provided with lateral digitiform and spinose processes similarly as all following (abdominal) segments. Cephalopharyngeal skeleton of 3 rd-instar larva situated inside of anterior part of puparium, affixed to its ventral wall (see Fig. 33). Posterior end (= caudal segment) of puparium more convex and posteriorly rounded (Figs 30, 33) and bearing several digitiform processes, posteriorly, laterally and also ventrally (Fig. 40); posterior pair of processes longest and carrying posterior spiracles (see below). Dorsal side of caudal segment medially more tuberculate and densely spinose (Fig. 30); ventral side of caudal segment anteriorly finely and sparsely transversely wrinkled but in front of (larval) anus with a more elevated and dark transverse ridge that is very finely spinulose (Fig. 40). Anus surrounded by bent spinose structures (Fig. 40, as). Posterior spiracles situated on long, digitiform and strongly spinose processes (Figs 40, 43) being distally bare, ringed and originally (in larva) obviously retractable; no lateral projections on these spiracular processes (in contrast to those of P. annulata) but ventrally, at their bases with an additional pair of smaller spinose processes (Fig. 40). Posterior spiracle small, set on short, stump-like end of posterior spiracular process (Fig. 40). Each spiracle with only 3 subcircular spiracular slits and 3 tufts of lateroclinate interspiracular hairs, some of which can be branched (Fig. 42).	en	Roháček, Jindřich (2022): The true identity of Periscelis winnertzii and description of P. laszloi sp. nov. from Europe (Diptera: Periscelididae). Acta Entomologica Musei Nationalis Pragae 62 (2): 301-323, DOI: 10.37520/aemnp.2022.018, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.37520/aemnp.2022.018
A11387B0FF89FFDFFF5C25BEFDC9FC8B.taxon	discussion	Remarks. Nomenclature. EGGER (1862, p. 780) used the name “ Winertzii ” throughout the original description including the derivatio nominis in the last paragraph of his text. Thus, the incorrect spelling of this name was not typographical or typing error as given by PAPP & WITHERS (2011: 356) and repeated by ROHÁĆEK & ANDRADE (2017: 247) but an unwanted (albeit several times repeated) distortion of the name of the collector, Johann Winnertz, to whom the species was dedicated. Jean Jean (also Johannes or Johann) Winnertz (11. ii. 1800 – 24. vii. 1890) was a factory owner, businessman and Commercial Court President in Crefeld (W. Germany) but also a well-known dipterist (mainly studying nematocerous flies) and sponsor of natural sciences (ENSS et al. 2020). EGGER (1862, p. 780) literally wrote “ Winertz hat sie schon vor Jahren gekannt und beschrieben, aber nicht veröffentlicht. Er hat sie Herrn Dr. Schiner bei Abfassung seines grossen Dipteren-Werkes zur Verfügung gestellt, wobei sich gezeigt hat, dass sie auch in Oesterreich einheimisch ist. ” [my translation: Winertz knew and described it years ago but did not publish it. He gave it to Dr. Schiner to be available when he was writing his large Diptera work, whereby it has been shown that it is also native to Austria]. Consequently, J. Egger described this species from Austrian specimens (collected by J. Winnertz?) received from J. R. Schiner so that this species could be included in Fauna Austriaca (SCHINER 1864: 272). Apparently, J. R. Schiner only orally asked J. Egger to name the species in honour of J. Winnertz which resulted in distortion of his surname. Therefore, already SCHINER (1864) correctly emended the name of this species to P. winnertzii. Subsequently, the species’ name has been variously misspelled; moreover, in the past P. winnertzii had been placed (besides Periscelis Loew, 1858) in two other genera and / or subgenera, viz. Microperiscelis Oldenberg, 1914 (= junior synonym of Myodris Lioy, 1864) and Parclioscena Enderlein, 1936 (here as type species!), see synonymies above. Preimaginal stages. PAPP (1998) and partly also MATHIS & PAPP (1998) mention larvae and a puparial shell of P. winnertzii collected in Hungary (see in “ Biology ” below). However, only one larva was reared to a female adult and really belonged to P. winnertzii. The identity of the remaining larvae is uncertain, inasmuch as both P. winnertzii and P. laszloi sp. nov. occurred syntopically on oak wounds studied by him. Although PAPP (1998: 115) wrote that these larvae will be described in a forthcoming paper, this intention failed to materialize. Therefore, only the puparium (and larval cephalopharyngeal skeleton extracted from it) of the reared female has been studied and described above with notes on differences from 3 rd instar larval characters of P. (Myodris) annulata as described and illustrated by PAPP (1995) and MATHIS & PAPP (1998). Relationships. Both P. winnertzii and its closest relative P. laszloi sp. nov. clearly belong to Periscelis (s. str.) as demonstrated by the construction of the male genitalia being very similar to that of P. annulipes Loew, 1858, the type species of the subgenus (cf. PAPP & WITHERS 2011: fig. 1) irrespective of the fact that these two species have the posterior cross-vein (dm-cu) complete. However, as shown by ROHÁĆEK & ANDRADE (2017), their dm-cu is interrupted by a “ vena spuria ” (cf. Figs 5, 76), which may indicate tendency to reduction of this cross-vein as is known in P. annulipes and some other species of the subgenus. Periscelis winnertzii and P. laszloi sp. nov. were considered a sister-pair already by ROHÁĆEK & ANDRADE (2017), albeit under different names. For more detail see below under P. laszloi sp. nov.	en	Roháček, Jindřich (2022): The true identity of Periscelis winnertzii and description of P. laszloi sp. nov. from Europe (Diptera: Periscelididae). Acta Entomologica Musei Nationalis Pragae 62 (2): 301-323, DOI: 10.37520/aemnp.2022.018, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.37520/aemnp.2022.018
A11387B0FF89FFDFFF5C25BEFDC9FC8B.taxon	biology_ecology	Biology. Previously EGGER (1862) wrote that this species occurs like P. annulata on sap running from poplars, oaks and horse chestnuts. However, this information is probably somewhat simplified or generalized – in fact P. winnertzii (and also P. laszloi sp. nov.) are usually associated with sap runs on oaks of various species (for habitat see Figs 6, 7). PAPP (1998) collected 28 adults on black oozing wounds of two oak trees but this series in fact included both true P. winnertzii and P. laszloi sp. nov. as found by their revision. PAPP (1998) also reported on 13 (1 first instar, 3 second instar, 9 third instar) larvae and 1 pupal shell (empty puparium) collected from wounds of oak tree. These could probably also belong to both species but one 3 rd instar larva that was collected on 23 May 1997 and reared in a vial with sap and wet corky bark in lab at 20 ℃, pupated on 17 June and emerged on 13 July was a female of true P. winnertzii (its empty puparium has been described above). Because both species occurred here on the same locality, habitat (wounds on oak trees) and time (September) they probably have also very similar phenology. According to his observations PAPP (1998: 118) believes that adults emerge in mid-July to early September, mate and lay eggs up to the beginning of September. Larvae develop around wounds under bark moistened by tree sap and reach at least to the 2 nd instar during September. The species overwinter as 3 rd instar larvae because they were caught in May (of the next year). Thus, P. winnertzii (and surely also P. laszloi) has only one generation per year. We now know at least four localities where both species occurred syntopically, viz. in an oak-chestnut forest in Switzerland, in an oak forest in Hungary and in two thermophilous oak (Quercus cerris) forests in Slovakia. The most efficient method to collect adults apparently are traps baited by wine, vinegar or beer (thus simulating fermenting tree sap), particularly those hanging higher (some 5 m) in canopies (cf. BĀCHLI 1997; PAPP 1998; Pollini Paltrinieri, personal communication 2021). The majority of the known specimens of P. winnertzii were collected in August – October, but there are some exceptional records from June and July.	en	Roháček, Jindřich (2022): The true identity of Periscelis winnertzii and description of P. laszloi sp. nov. from Europe (Diptera: Periscelididae). Acta Entomologica Musei Nationalis Pragae 62 (2): 301-323, DOI: 10.37520/aemnp.2022.018, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.37520/aemnp.2022.018
A11387B0FF89FFDFFF5C25BEFDC9FC8B.taxon	distribution	Distribution. Periscelis winnertzii seems to be widespread in Europe. Because it was formerly mixed with its closest relative P. laszloi sp. nov. (= winnertzii auctt.), the reliable old records are only those by EGGER (1862) and SCHINER (1864) from Austria (both based on type specimens). Further reliable records are those recorded recently (after ROHÁĆEK & ANDRADE 2017) under P. fugax and those revised here. Currently, P. winnertzii is known from the following countries: Portugal (ROHÁĆEK et al. 2016, as P. sp. cf. winnertzii; ROHÁĆEK & ANDRADE 2017, as P. fugax); Spain (CARLES- TOLRÁ et al., 2018, as P. fugax), Great Britain: England (CHANDLER 2017, HELLQVIST 2020, both as P. fugax), France (WITHERS 2017, CHANDLER 2017, both as P. fugax), Switzerland (material examined), Czech Republic: Bohemia and Moravia (MÁCA et al. 2005; MÁCA 2009; ROHÁĆEK & ANDRADE 2017, as P. fugax), Slovakia (new), Hungary (new), Croatia (new), Albania (DE BREE 2022, as P. fugax). Periscelis winnertzii has been confirmed to occur sympatrically with P. laszloi sp. nov. in the following countries: Portugal, Spain, Great Britain, Switzerland, Slovakia and Hungary.	en	Roháček, Jindřich (2022): The true identity of Periscelis winnertzii and description of P. laszloi sp. nov. from Europe (Diptera: Periscelididae). Acta Entomologica Musei Nationalis Pragae 62 (2): 301-323, DOI: 10.37520/aemnp.2022.018, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.37520/aemnp.2022.018
A11387B0FF81FFC0FF7326C8FDA2F97A.taxon	description	(Figs 44 – 76)	en	Roháček, Jindřich (2022): The true identity of Periscelis winnertzii and description of P. laszloi sp. nov. from Europe (Diptera: Periscelididae). Acta Entomologica Musei Nationalis Pragae 62 (2): 301-323, DOI: 10.37520/aemnp.2022.018, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.37520/aemnp.2022.018
A11387B0FF81FFC0FF7326C8FDA2F97A.taxon	materials_examined	Type material. HOLOTYPE: ♂, labelled: “ Szokolya, Vasfazék-v., Magas Tax alatt, 450 m, Papp László és János ”, “ fekete tölgyfaseb, kifolyó nedvéről ” (obverse), “ 13 Sep 1997 ” (reverse, handwritten), “ Hungarian Natural History Museum, Diptera Coll. Budapest ” (blue label) and “ Holotypus J, Periscelis (P.) laszloi sp. n., J. Roháček det. 2022 ” (red label) (HNMH, intact, examined, Fig. 44). PARATYPES: 3 ♂♂ 12 ♀♀, same data as for holotype (2 ♂♂ 2 ♀♀ genit. prep., 2 ♂♂ 2 ♀♀ captured in copula) (all HNMH). [fekete tölgyfaseb, kifolyó nedvéről = on black sap runs from wound of oak]. Other paratypes: PORTUGAL: PORTO: Vila Nova de Gaia, Avintes, Parque Biológico de Gaia, 41 ° 06 ′ 00.0 ″ N, 8 ° 33 ′ 35.3 ″ W, 50 m, 29. vi. 2011, sweeping over bark of Quercus trees with sap runs, 1 ♂, R. Andrade leg. (dried from ethanol, genit. prep., SMOC); Valongo, Valongo, 41 ° 09 ′ 33.4 ″ N, 8 ° 29 ′ 05.6 ″ W, 50 – 100 m, sweeping over bark of Quercus trees with sap runs, 4. x. 2011, 1 ♂ 1 ♀, R. Andrade leg. (in glycerine, ♂ genit. prep., SMOC). SWITZERLAND: TI 701.168 113.371, Losone: Arcegno, Collina di Maia, Castagneto con querce, 417 m, prd. 32 B, Finestra [window trap], ARC 2, 20. xi. – 22. xii. 2017, 2 ♂♂ 1 ♀ (SMOC, 1 ♂ genit. prep.); same locality but TI 701.298 113.204, 365 m, prd. 3, SLAM trap UP [Malaise type trap in tree canopy], ARC 1, 7. – 18. viii. 2015, 1 ♂ (MCSN); same locality but TI 701.013 113.741, 411 m, prd. 7, VINO Gialla [trap with yellow wine], ARC 3, 24. ix. – 9. x. 2015, 1 ♂ 9 ♀♀ (MCSN); same locality but TI 701.168 113.372, prd. 8, VINO Bianca [trap with white wine], ARC 2, 9. – 23. x. 2015, 4 ♂♂ 15 ♀♀ (2 ♂♂ 11 ♀♀ MCSN, 1 ♂ 2 ♀♀ NMPC, 1 ♂ 2 ♀♀ SMOC); same locality but TI 701.011 113.773, prd. 6, BIRRA Bianca [trap with pale beer], ARC 3, 8. – 24. ix. 2015, 1 ♂ 9 ♀♀ (MCSN), all L. Pollini P. & M. Abderhalden leg. HUNGARY: W. Hungary: Kőszegi TK: Kőszek, Hétforrás patak fölött, 10. vii. 2002, 1 intersex (PHOTO), L. Papp leg. (det. L. Papp 2002 as P. winnertzii) (intact, HNHM); N. Hungary, Bükk Mts: Varbó env., Fonagy sági-tó, 48 ° 08 ′ 56 ″ N 20 ° 35 ′ 21 ″ E, 250 m, on oak tree bark in deciduous forest, 9. viii. 2018, 1 ♀, J. Roháček leg. (PHOTO) (SMOC). SLOVAKIA: C. Slovakia: Muránska Dlhá Lúka 2 km SE, 48 ° 42 ′ 12 ″ N, 20 ° 05 ′ 51 ″ E, 360 m, beer trap in hornbeam forest, 3. ix. – 27. x. 2012, 1 ♀, J. Roháček & J. Ševčík leg. (dried from ethanol, SMOC); Muránska planina NP: Muránska Lehota 3.7 km E, above Javorníčková dolina, 48 ° 43 ′ 15 ″ N, 19 ° 59 ′ 56 ″ E, 780 m, sweeping undergrowth of oak-linden forest, 13. viii. 2015, 1 ♀, J. Roháček leg. (PHOTO) (genit. prep., SMOC); Muránska planina NP: Šarkanica res., 48 ° 42 ′ 45 ″ N, 19 ° 59 ′ 19 ″ E, 580 m, protein trap, 9. viii. – 5. ix. 2017, 1 ♀; same locality, Malaise trap, 6. – 27. ix. 2017, 1 ♂, J. Roháček, J. Ševčík & M. Tkoč leg. (both dried from ethanol, NMPC); S. Slovakia: Cerová vrchovina PLA: Hajnáčka-Buková 0.4 km NNE, 48 ° 13 ′ 39 ″ N, 19 ° 58 ′ 25 ″ E, 375 m, beer trap, 12. ix. – 11. x. 2018, 1 ♂, J. Roháček, J. Ševčík & M. Tkoč leg. (dried from ethanol, genit. prep., SMOC); Cerová vrchovina PLA: Jestice 1.3 km SSE, Hradisko Mt., 48 ° 12 ′ 31 ″ N, 20 ° 03 ′ 39 ″ E, 255 m, wine traps on Quercus cerris, 19. vii. – 17. viii. 2022, 1 ♂ 1 ♀, 13. ix. – 26. x. 2022, 1 ♀, J. Roháček leg. (dried from ethanol, SMOC). SWEDEN: Ög: Boxhom k: n: Björneberg, WGS 84: 58.196997 / 14.911511, inäga, 28. vi. – 23. vii. 2019, 1 ♂, 31. viii. – 19. x. 2019, 1 ♀, Niklas Johansson leg. (dried from ethanol, ♀ with right wing glued to card) (NHRS, ♂ no. 000104579, ♀ no. 000104337). According to HELLQUIST (2020, as P. winnertzii) these specimens were collected in a Malaise trap. Other material examined (excluded from type series). SWITZERLAND: TI 701.168 113.371, Losone: Arcegno, Collina di Maia, Castagneto con querce, 417 m, prd. 32 B, Finestra [window trap], ARC 2, 20. xi. – 22. xii. 2017, 1 ♀, used for mo 1 ecular study (SMOC, body after DNA extraction preserved in a pinned microvial in glycerine, with blue label: JR 35, OM 314933). HUNGARY: Kapornak [= Nagy Kapornak], without further data, 3 ♂♂, heavily damaged, all Aradi det. as „ Microperiscelis Winnertzi ” (HNHM, all genit. prep.); Badacsony, without further data, 1 ♂, heavily damaged, Thalhammer leg., Aradi det. as „ Microperiscelis Winnertzi ” (HNHM, genit. prep.). Note. There are 2 other specimens from Badacsony in HNHM but they are headless and without abdomen, hence not safely identifiable. GREAT BRITAIN: ENGLAND: Herefordshire, Little Doward, 9. viii. – 20. ix. 2021, 1 ♀, flight interception trap in large cavity of live beech, K. N. A. Alexander leg., P. J. Chandler det. (PCB, not examined) (P. J. Chandler, personal communication 2022).	en	Roháček, Jindřich (2022): The true identity of Periscelis winnertzii and description of P. laszloi sp. nov. from Europe (Diptera: Periscelididae). Acta Entomologica Musei Nationalis Pragae 62 (2): 301-323, DOI: 10.37520/aemnp.2022.018, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.37520/aemnp.2022.018
A11387B0FF81FFC0FF7326C8FDA2F97A.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis. Slightly larger on average (2.66 – 4.17 mm) and more robust than P. winnertzii, with similar body colouration, wing venation and chaetotaxy. It distinctly differs from the latter species by: pedicel with black spot larger, extended laterally towards its ventral side (Figs 44, 48, 72); mesonotum more uniformly grey microtomentose, with brown medial spots small, indistinct to absent (Figs 47, 75); acrostichal setulae more numerous than in P. winnertzii, in 10 – 12 rows on suture; scutellum normally darker, with yellow colour reduced (Figs 47, 75); wing with brown infuscation reduced, particularly at apex, between r-m and dm-cu and on A 1 (Figs 44, 76); male pregenital sternum (S 6) more or less widened posteriorly, without posteromedial depression but with acutely projecting anterior corners (Figs 60, 61); surstylus distally more slender and acutely pointed (Fig. 50); gonostylus with apex distinctly curved (Fig. 51); postgonite with basal part not expanded ventrally (Figs 58, 59); female T 8 wider, posteromedially pale pigmented (Fig. 66); female S 8 also wider, less densely setose, only laterally dark-pigmented (Fig. 67); spermathecae (Fig. 69) larger, with diameter more than 3.5 times larger than diameter of duct. For other (smaller) differences see description below.	en	Roháček, Jindřich (2022): The true identity of Periscelis winnertzii and description of P. laszloi sp. nov. from Europe (Diptera: Periscelididae). Acta Entomologica Musei Nationalis Pragae 62 (2): 301-323, DOI: 10.37520/aemnp.2022.018, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.37520/aemnp.2022.018
A11387B0FF81FFC0FF7326C8FDA2F97A.taxon	description	Description. Male. Total body length 2.66 – 3.81 (holotype 3.30) mm. General colour brown, dull, grey (with silvery blue tinge) microtomentose; some parts of head, thorax and all legs yellow to whitish variegated; abdomen with silvery white microtomentose lateral maculae on terga T 2 – T 5 (Figs 44, 47, 72). Head distinctly longer ventrally than dorsally in profile (Fig. 44); face medially keel-like, protruding below antennae and relatively pale-pigmented (ochreous to whitish) but with some parts darkened (Fig. 45), largely microtomentose and dull. Eye elongately suboval, ellipsoid to slightly ovoid with longest diameter oblique and 1.6 – 1.7 times as long as shortest. Postgena expanded towards occiput (mainly ventrally) due to eye shape and position; eye brightly red in living adults (cf. Figs 73 – 75), with sparse and short whitish interfacetal microsetulae. Occiput distinctly concave, brown to pale brown, only marginally yellow to (ventrally) whitish yellow; concave brownish area of occiput with relatively large patch of silvery microtomentum on each side. Frons without microsetae, broad (ca 1.7 times as wide as high), very slightly narrowed anteriorly; medially slightly but distinctly depressed against orbits and ochreous or pale brown; lateral parts of frons (mainly orbits) yellow to (anteriorly) whitish yellow and whitish microtomentose; ocellar triangle at posterior margin of frons, small but somewhat elevated, brown to blackish brown (darkest part of frons); ocelli relatively large, arranged in equilateral triangle. Face (Fig. 45) distinctly bicolourous: ventrally brown to blackish brown, dorsally yellow to pale yellow including narrow medial keel-like carina [thus face dorsally distinctly paler than in P. winnertzii where carina is normally brownish], only in Swedish specimen distinctly darkened laterally. Dark ventral part of face protruding above mouthedge and medially shining tuberculate but ventrolateral areas with distinct silvery, slightly bluish, microtomentum. Facial sensilla absent but ventrolateral part of face (below anterior end of gena) with fine inclinate setae. Gena relatively low, with only anterior corner brown, otherwise pale, largely dirty white and whitish microtomentose but its ventral margin more (anteriorly) or less darkened (ochreous to pale brown); postgena and adjacent part of occiput pale yellow to dirty white. Antennae very slightly divergent and largely yellow, 1 st flagellomere whitish yellow, but pedicel with dull blackish anterodorsal spot extended anterolaterally more ventrally that in P. winnertzii, see Fig. 44, in extreme (specimen from Sweden) covering its entire outer side. Pedicel somewhat expanded dorsally, setose at anterior margin, with dorsal setae longer than those lateral. 1 st flagellomere elongate, with dorsal margin straight to slightly concave and apex with short whitish pilosity; arista dirty yellow, somewhat longer than antenna, long-pectinate (longest dorsal rays about as long as 1 st flagellomere), dorsally with 4 – 5, ventrally usually with 3 long brown rays in addition to shorter rays basally and in its distal half. Mouthparts ochreous to pale brown; clypeus usually dark brown; palpus slightly clavate, pale brown to brown, with a number of short dark setulae. Cephalic chaetotaxy (Figs 44, 45): all macrosetae blackish brown; pvt well developed (but shortest of frontal setae), strongly divergent, arising behind and between posterior ocelli; vti robust and very long (longest cephalic seta, almost as long as eye longest diameter), upright, very slightly inclinate; vte and oc subequal in length, strong but much shorter than vti; vte lateroclinate; oc proclinate, subparallel to slightly divergent, inserted outside ocellar triangle; only 1 reclinate ors, shorter than vte and situated in middle of orbit; 3 – 5 microsetulae in front of ors; no vibrissa or pseudovibrissa but with 3 – 5 short ventro-proclinate setae on ventral side of vibrissal angle and anterior part of gena; 4 or 5 smaller inclinate setae also on lateroventral margin of face; gena posteriorly to vibrissal part with a series of 6 – 7 thicker and longer ventroclinate peristomal setae; no true genal seta; posteriorly extended postgena and occiput behind eye with a number of short setae; also posteroventral angle of occiput with a number of setae, 1 or (less often) 2 longer than others; postocular setulae behind posterodorsal margin of eye numerous, dorsally in single, ventrally in 2 to 3 rows. Thorax (Figs 44, 47, 72) slightly narrower than head, brown to dark brown but laterally pale (yellow to whitish) variegated, densely microtomentose and mostly dull (except for some parts of pleural sclerites). Mesonotum (cf. Fig. 47) dark brown, dorsally almost uniformly densely bluish grey microtomentose (at most dorsomedially with some brownish microtomentum) but laterally with a narrow dark brown microtomentose stripe. Scutellum normally concolourous with mesonotum, thus largely brown with greyish microtomentum but with apex often ochreous to yellow, more rarely (as in holotype, intersex (see below) and some other specimens, particularly those faded in ethanol) also medially ochreous yellow. Humeral callus (postpronotal lobe) white to whitish yellow; notopleural area also lighter than adjacent mesonotum, pale brown to yellowish around posterior npl (Figs 44, 72). Pleural part of thorax generally paler than mesonotum, less microtomentose and subshining, with narrow ochreous to yellow longitudinal stripe dorsally and yellow to white (anteriorly) and whitish microtomentose band in the middle, ranging from base of fore coxa to haltere (Fig. 44). Sternopleuron (katepisternum) dorsally brown but its ventral corner lighter brown to ochreous yellow. Mediotergite brown. Scutellum basally wider than long, rounded trapezoidal; subscutellum small but distinct and dark brown. Thoracic chaetotaxy (Figs 44, 47): macrosetae and setulae blackish brown to black; ac setulae more numerous than in P. winnertzii, in 10 – 12 rows on suture but with only 4 rows reaching almost to scutellum, prescutellar ac setulae enlarged (more so than in P. winnertzii); 2 very long and strong postsutural dc, the anterior about two-thirds of the more robust posterior, 12 – 15 dc setulae in front of anterior dc but no or only 1 setula between dc setae; 1 strong hu (postpronotal) seta plus 5 or 6 setulae on whitish humeral callus; 2 strong npl, anterior as long as or slightly longer than hu, posterior distinctly shorter; 1 sa (as long as anterior npl) and 1 slightly shorter to subequal pa; 2 sc, apical as long as posterior dc, laterobasal distinctly shorter than anterior dc; 1 pair of fine setulae between apical sc (sometimes absent); 1 short but distinct ppl, sometimes with 1 ppl setula in addition; anepisternum with a number of short setulae in posterodorsal half; 2 stpl (katepisternal) setae, anterior always shorter, some setulae between stpl, numerous setulae on disc and 4 longer but fine setae on ventral corner of katepisternum. Wing (Fig. 76) relatively broad, with pale brown membrane darker infuscated in some small parts; veins ochreous to dark brown. Wing pattern less distinct than in P. winnertzii: infuscation around apices of R 2 + 3 and R 4 + 5 reduced, more distinct only around r-m and along M between r-m and dm-cu; also alula is darkened. Veins are distinctly darkened in all these fumose parts and also in distal two-thirds of R 1, almost entire R 4 + 5 and basal parts of M and CuA 1; in contrast to P. winnertzii A 1 is not so much darkened. C entire, without breaks, uniformly setulose and reaching to apex of R 4 + 5. Sc short, seemingly ending free in subcostal cell but its apex upcurved to C as a somewhat darkened venal fold. R 1 short but robust, slightly bent to C; R 2 + 3 long, running more distantly from R 4 + 5 than in P. winnertzii and with upcurved apex ending closer to apex of R 4 + 5 than M. R 4 + 5 slightly sinuate (not straight) and ending at wing apex. Distal part of M apically recurved, diverging from R 4 + 5. M normally reaching wing margin (1 ♂ from Hungary and 1 ♀ from Slovakia aberrant, with M on one wing ending far from it). Cross-vein r-m situated in distal half of dm cell; cross-vein dm-cu distinct but attenuated or interrupted by spurious vein. CuA 1 apically slightly bent, ending just in front of wing margin. Cells bm and cup closed, veins of cup somewhat attenuated. A 1 distinct but ending far from wing margin. Alula well developed, darkened, with marginal ciliation as long as that of anal lobe of wing. Wing measurements: length 2.90 – 4.01 (holotype 3.93) mm, width 1.11 – 1.49 (holotype 1.45) mm, Cs 3: Cs 4 = 0.53 – 0.61, r-m / dm-cu: dm-cu = 1.44 – 2.50. Haltere relatively large, yellowish; knob usually with slightly darker apex. Legs (Figs 44, 71, 72) yellow or yellowish white and brown variegated on fore coxa (with posterodorsal and ventral part pale yellow) and all femora, tibiae and tarsi; setae brown but setulae pale, often ochreous. f 1 and f 2 have two incomplete (dorsally interrupted) brown rings, the basal paler, the subapical darker (thus with knees and dorsal side of femur yellow); while f 3 has anterodorsally (or only anteriorly) longitudinal brown spot being distally dilated and darkened to form an almost complete ring subapically, leaving knee and all remaining parts of femur yellow. Thus, f 3 is generally paler (more yellow) than that of P. winnertzii. Tibiae with two brown rings: a proximal below knee and a distal subapically but t 1 has distal ring longer, almost reaching tibial apex. Tarsi largely yellowish white to (fore tarsus) white, each with 2 distal segments brown (apical segment darker). Chaetotaxy: f 1 (Fig. 71) with a series of 8 – 11 (more on the average than in P. winnertzii) long and thicker posteroventral setae and with a double row of shorter and finer upright posterodorsal setae (4 or 5 in more dorsal row thicker); f 2 posteroventrally with a row of numerous fine setae (longest about three-fourths of maximum width of femur); t 1 with 1 short (slightly longer than other tibial setulae) posterodorsal subapical seta; t 2 with 1 distinct and thicker ventroapical seta (slightly shorter than maximum width of tibia); remaining parts of legs simply shortly setulose. Abdomen relatively broad, of subovoid outline in dorsal view, dorsally largely brown to dark brown, with some parts ochreous to yellow, ventrally pale brown. T 1 + T 2 as long as T 3 + T 4, with distinct boundary between T 1 and T 2. T 1 dorsally ochreous yellow, only laterally brown; T 2 – T 5 broad and transverse, bent laterally onto ventral side, gradually becoming narrower posteriorly and each brown, with a blackish brown transverse band in front of posterior margin, T 3 – T 5 with yellowish white, silvery microtomentose spot on each side (Figs 44, 72). All preabdominal terga shortly setose, with longest and thickest setae in posterolateral corners. Preabdominal sterna (S 1 – S 5) relatively large (hence membrane between terga and sterna narrow), broad and more or less transverse. S 1 undescribed, probably short and pale; S 2 transversely suboblong, almost completely yellow to pale ochreous; S 3 – S 4 subequal, of similar, slightly transversely trapezoidal, brown, darker laterally; S 5 narrower than S 4, slightly transversely suboblong, with corners rounded. S 2 – S 5 with scattered short fine setosity. Abdominal spiracles (1 – 6) in membrane close to lateral margins of terga. Postabdomen: T 6 relatively large, although narrower and somewhat shorter than T 5, transverse but distinctly tapered posteriorly, setose similarly and also bearing lateral silvery spots as have T 3 – T 5 (Fig. 44). S 6 (= pregenital sternum, Figs 60, 61) narrower and generally paler than S 5, more or less widened posteriorly, with anterior corners acutely projecting and always without posteromedial depression, typically with brown pattern along margins (Fig. 61) and sparse fine setae in posterior half (longest laterally); rarely S 6 is less widened posteriorly and with more irregular pigmentation (see Fig. 60); dorsal pregenital synsclerite (a fusion of T 7 and S 7 and, possibly, also T 8 and S 8) relatively short, arch-shaped, symmetrical and laterally reaching far onto ventral side of postabdomen, dark brown and shortly setose in posterior half and also embedding 7 th spiracles in its lateral parts. Genitalia (Figs 49 – 59). Epandrium relatively small, dark brown, wider than high, in form of an arch-like sclerite, with large anal opening (Fig. 56), setose only in posterior third, anteriorly projecting ventrally to form slender and long surstylus (Figs 49, 50, 57) on each side. Cerci large and robust, longer than heigth of epandrium without surstylus (Figs 49, 52), relatively distant from each other (Fig. 56). Each cercus elongate, with apex tapered and slightly incurved but not acute (Figs 49, 56) and rather uniformly setose, mainly posteriorly (distinctly more densely than in P. winnertzii); micropubescence restricted to posterior and posterolateral surface (Fig. 52). Surstylus (Figs 49, 50) proximally wider (with more or less angular anterodorsal corner), distally tapered, slender, with microsetulae in distal third, largely at outer side, and with apex acute in lateral view (Fig. 50), somewhat lanceolate in anterior view (Fig. 57) but more slender than that of P. winnertzii. Gonostylus (Figs 49, 51, 57) distinctly shorter than surstylus, basally wider, distally tapered and rod-like (in distal two-thirds), with apex curved anteriorly and with a group of microsetulae in distal fourth. Gonostyli are dorsomedially posteriorly movably attached to medandrium (Figs 56, 57, ma); the latter reduced to a small transverse, slightly arched and bare sclerite. Hypandrium (Fig. 49, hy) frame-like, bare, relatively symmetrical and slender, but dorsally fused to ventral parts of enlarged pocket-shaped anterior part of phallapodeme and its sides projecting posteriorly to reach medandrium. Pregonites not developed. Aedeagal complex (Figs 49, 58) more voluminous than epandrium due to enlarged phallapodeme. Phallapodeme (Fig. 49, pha) composed of two sclerites: anterior (distal) sclerite strongly expanded and pocket-shaped, arched anterodorsally and ventrolaterally fused with hypandrium (Fig. 49, dpha); posterior sclerite short, more heavily sclerotized, forked (shallowly anterodorsally, deeply posteroventrally (see Figs 55, 58, bpha) and attached to posterior end of anterior sclerite. Aedeagus simple, undivided (no separate phallophore), basally very slightly dilated and darker-pigmented (Figs 55, 58), otherwise formed by a very long, ribbon-shaped, submembranous distiphallus being proximally hidden in a pocket-shaped part of phallapodeme and distally projecting from its ventral part (see Fig. 49); apex of distiphallus somewhat flattened and widened, simple to somewhat denticulate on tip. Postgonite (Figs 58, 59, pg) relatively stout, much larger and thicker than gonostylus, with proximal part dilated but not expanded posteroventrally, knee-like bent in the middle, and distally slender, digitiform (but more robust than in P. winnertzii) and with several microsetulae at posterior margin of outer side. Ejacapodeme large but smaller than phallapodeme, generally rod-like but its shape and (particularly) thickness somewhat variable (cf. Figs 49, 53), with both ends dilated, proximal end more widened and somewhat forked at insertion of ejaculatory duct (Fig. 54). Female. Similar to male unless mentioned otherwise. Total body length 3.02 – 4.17 mm. Head with lighter colouration of frons and, particularly, face. Frons somewhat paler, medially ochreous, laterally and anteriorly yellow to white, only ocellar triangle brownish (Fig. 47); face dorsally almost entirely yellow to whitish yellow (Fig. 46), at most darkened pale brownish near vibrissal angle; ventrally, including shining protruding tuberculate part, dirty ochreous and below the latter densely whitish microtomentose; parafacialia with distinct small elongate brown spot above vibrissal angle (this is reduced or pale in P. winnertzii); gena whitish yellow to (posteriorly) white (Fig. 48), with vibrissal angle and bases of peristomal setae somewhat darkened and ventral marginal line ochreous. f 2 posteroventrally without long row of setae, only subapically with 4 or 5 longer setae. Wing measurements: length 3.30 – 4.25 mm, width 1.29 – 1.63 mm, Cs 3: Cs 4 = 0.52 – 0.65, rm / dm-cu: dm-cu = 1.67 – 1.94. An aberrant specimen with supernumerary r-r cross-vein between R 2 + 3 and R 4 + 5 near apex of left wing has been found among specimens from Switzerland. Abdomen wider than in male, broadly ovoid. Preabdominal terga T 3 – T 5 more transverse and brown (dorsomedially paler than laterally), without darker transverse bands (darkening of posterior margins is caused by overlap of sclerites) but with silvery lateral spots as in male (Fig. 73). T 5 distinctly narrowed posteriorly (Fig. 65) in contrast to foregoing terga. Preabdominal sterna with similar colouration and setosity as in male but S 2 – S 3 more transverse; S 3 – S 5 subequal or becoming very slightly wider posteriorly, laterally less distinctly darkened and all transversely suboblong, with corners more or less rounded. Postabdomen (Figs 62 – 65) broad anteriorly, strongly tapered posteriorly. T 6 large, not shorter than T 5 but smaller and very strongly tapered posteriorly, with lateral part bent ventrally, brown but laterobasally bearing white and silvery microtomentose spots (visible on Fig. 73 but not on Fig. 65 because they are situated dorsolaterally), finely setose in posterior half and laterally. S 6 simple (Fig. 65), transversely suboblong, smaller than S 5 but distinctly longer and less transverse than that of P. winnertzii, ochreous but posterolaterally more or less darkened, with 3 pairs of longer setae at posterior margin besides short setosity. 6 th spiracle situated in margin of T 6 (Fig. 65), which is more bent ventrally than that of P. winnertzii. T 7 and S 7 fused to tergosternum T 7 + S 7 forming a complete ring (Figs 64, 65), uniformly brown and ventrally more densely setose than dorsally, with longest setae at posterior margin laterodorsally. 7 th spiracle situated laterally, inside T 7 + S 7 (Fig. 63). T 8 forming a bent, subcircular to crescent-shaped sclerite (Figs 62, 64, 66), markedly wider than that of P. winnertzii and posteromedially pale pigmented, relatively long setose in posterior two-thirds (longest setae posterolaterally). S 8 (Figs 67, 65) of size similar to T 8 but round trapezoidal, narrower posteriorly, setose on entire disc (less densely than that of P. winnertzii), largely yellowish, dark-pigmented only laterally. Genital chamber elongate, membranous; ventral receptacle (Fig. 68) submembranous, digitiform, distally not dilated, finely striated both proximally and distally (without tuberculate surface / known in P. winnertzii / subterminally), and with terminal projection simple, rather finger-like, in contrast to being tail-like and twisted in P. winnertzii. Spermathecae (1 + 2) globular (Fig. 69) as in P. winnertzii, but larger compared to ducts, blackish brown and heavily sclerotized; spermathecal ducts long, with internal spiral structure; duct fork connecting 2 spermathecae very short. T 10 (supraanal plate) practically absent or entirely membranous (Fig. 62). S 10 (subanal plate) reduced to short, crescent-shaped, weakly sclerotized and pale-pigmented sclerite (Figs 64, 65), somewhat micropubescent and with 2 or 3 posterolateral setulae. Cercus (Figs 62, 63) small, short, subovoid, with numerous (but not long) fine setae apart from dense micropubescence; lateral setae usually slightly longer than longest apical seta. Intersex. A peculiar adult specimen from Hungary, obviously an intersex, has been examined (Fig. 72). Its terminalia are distinctly male, with all characters (including the apically curved gonostylus, visible on Fig. 72) identical to those of a typical male. Also the mid femur is of a male, with a long row of posteroventral setae. However, its head has frons and face coloured as in female, including characteristically pale lower face (Fig. 70) and there are no dark transverse bands on preabdominal terga (as in female). Thus, the dimorphic male and female characters seem to have mosaic distribution on body. Moreover, it has an unusually pale (ochreous with yellow apex) scutellum, resembling more that of P. winnertzii than that of typical P. laszloi. Because this interesting intersex specimen undoubtedly belongs to P. laszloi sp. nov., it has been included in the type series as a paratype.	en	Roháček, Jindřich (2022): The true identity of Periscelis winnertzii and description of P. laszloi sp. nov. from Europe (Diptera: Periscelididae). Acta Entomologica Musei Nationalis Pragae 62 (2): 301-323, DOI: 10.37520/aemnp.2022.018, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.37520/aemnp.2022.018
A11387B0FF81FFC0FF7326C8FDA2F97A.taxon	etymology	Etymology. The species is named in honour of the late Laszló Papp (1946 – 2021), an eminent Hungarian dipterist and my friend, who essentially contributed to the knowledge of the family Periscelididae and many other families of Acalyptratae.	en	Roháček, Jindřich (2022): The true identity of Periscelis winnertzii and description of P. laszloi sp. nov. from Europe (Diptera: Periscelididae). Acta Entomologica Musei Nationalis Pragae 62 (2): 301-323, DOI: 10.37520/aemnp.2022.018, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.37520/aemnp.2022.018
A11387B0FF81FFC0FF7326C8FDA2F97A.taxon	discussion	Remarks. As noted above, Periscelis (P.) laszloi sp. nov. is identical with the species previously interpreted by PAPP & WITHERS (2011) as P. winnertzii. This erroneous concept of P. winnertzii was followed by ROHÁĆEK & ANDRADE (2017) who described a closely allied sister-species, P. fugax, being recognized here as a synononym of true P. winnertzii Egger (see above). However, the series identified by L. Papp in HNHM included in fact both species (P. laszloi sp. nov. and true P. winnertzii). He apparently had not differentiated them because the only male of true P. winnertzii in the collection of HNHM has lost its terminalia. Relationships. As given above, P. laszloi sp. nov. is the closest relative of P. winnertzii Egger, 1862. Their sister- - species relationships seems to be demonstrated by close similarity of external features and, particularly, of characters of their male and female terminalia. Particularly, the gonostylus with microsetulae restricted to the apical part and the male cercus with shortly setose apex can be considered putative synapomorphies of this pair. Also the sexual dichroism of the lower face (dark brown in male, yellow in female) can be another synapomorphy of these species. No synapomorphy can be currently found in the female postabdomen because female terminalia remain unknown in other congeners. However, the close alliance of both species is also supported by similarity of their barcoding region of COI gene (see Tab. 2 and Fig. 78). This sister-pair belongs to the subgenus Periscelis (s. str.) which has been elevated to genus by PAPP & WITHERS (2011) but this act has not been accepted by MATHIS & RUNG (2011) or ROHÁĆEK & ANDRADE (2017).	en	Roháček, Jindřich (2022): The true identity of Periscelis winnertzii and description of P. laszloi sp. nov. from Europe (Diptera: Periscelididae). Acta Entomologica Musei Nationalis Pragae 62 (2): 301-323, DOI: 10.37520/aemnp.2022.018, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.37520/aemnp.2022.018
A11387B0FF81FFC0FF7326C8FDA2F97A.taxon	biology_ecology	Biology. PAPP (1998, as P. winnertzii) studied the biology and behaviour of the species in Hungary. Although he did not distinguish between species under study (P. laszloi and P. winnertzii were mixed in his series of adults) it seems that they have very similar biology, including the univoltine life-history (for detail see above under P. winnertzii). Although preferentially associated with sap runs on oak (Quercus robur, Q. petraea) trees in warm forests (Fig. 77) including Quercus cerris in Slovakia (Figs 6, 7), Q. pyrenaica and other Quercus species in Portugal (ROHÁĆEK et al. 2016, fig. 11), the data obtained from material examined indicate that P. laszloi can similarly live also on other trees. Adults were also collected in oak-chestnut (Querceto-Castanetum) forest, hornbeam (Carpinetum) forest, mixed submontane deciduous forest with prevailing beech and, according to HELLQUIST (2020, as P. winnertzii), a pair of Swedish specimens was even captured in a Malaise trap installed among uprooted aspen tree trunks. As in P. winnertzii adults of P. laszloi are attracted to wine and beer and can be most easily collected by mean of traps with this bait installed in tree canopy; interestingly, in Slovakia, one female was also captured into a protein (meat-baited, with ethanol as preservation medium) trap. Adults occur from July to November (most commonly in August to October) but two specimens were captured already in late June.	en	Roháček, Jindřich (2022): The true identity of Periscelis winnertzii and description of P. laszloi sp. nov. from Europe (Diptera: Periscelididae). Acta Entomologica Musei Nationalis Pragae 62 (2): 301-323, DOI: 10.37520/aemnp.2022.018, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.37520/aemnp.2022.018
A11387B0FF81FFC0FF7326C8FDA2F97A.taxon	distribution	Distribution. Because previous records of “ Periscelis winnertzii ” have not all been revised, data on distribution of Periscelis laszloi sp. nov. remain rather fragmentary. Only as and when the two species have been separated by ROHÁĆEK & ANDRADE (2017) subsequent authors recorded this species reliably but under the name P. winnertzii. Thus, P. laszloi has hitherto been only confirmed in Portugal (ROHÁĆEK & ANDRADE 2017, as P. winnertzii, see also type material), Spain (CARLES- TOLRÁ 2018, as P. winnertzii = a revised previous record by CARLES- TOLRÁ & PAGOLA- CARTE 2013), Switzerland (POLLINI PALTRINIERI & ROHÁĆEK 2022, as P. winnertzii and type material), Slovakia (ROHÁĆEK 2013, ROHÁĆEK & ANDRADE 2017, both as P. winnertzii, and type material), Hungary (ROHÁĆEK & ANDRADE 2017, as P. winnertzii, and type material) but also in Great Britain (England, P. J. Chandler, personal communication 2022, see above), southern Sweden (HELLQUIST 2020, as P. winnertzii) and southern Finland (HAARTO & WINQVIST 2014, as P. winnertzii). The identity of the specimen from the latter country, viz. from N: Raasepori, Dragsvik has been verified by comparison of its photograph and COI sequence in BOLD system, see https: // www. boldsystems. org / index. php / Public _ BarcodeCluster? clusteruri = BOLD: ACE 1527. A record of P. winnertzii from Poland (Breslau = Wrocław) revised by PAPP & WITHERS (2011) is uncertain because these authors have not recognized both species. This also is true for some of the previous records of P. winnertzii from Great Britain, France, The Netherlands, and Germany (summarized by MATHIS & RUNG 2011). Hitherto, P. laszloi has not been ascertained in the Czech Republic because all specimens recorded by MÁCA et al. (2005) proved to belong to true P. winnertzii (= P. fugax, see above), thus the latter species is listed correctly in MÁCA (2009). Obviously, P. laszloi is widespread in southern and temperate Europe, and, consequently, it is expected to be recorded from other countries in future, particularly by means of wine and beer baited traps installed in canopies of deciduous trees.	en	Roháček, Jindřich (2022): The true identity of Periscelis winnertzii and description of P. laszloi sp. nov. from Europe (Diptera: Periscelididae). Acta Entomologica Musei Nationalis Pragae 62 (2): 301-323, DOI: 10.37520/aemnp.2022.018, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.37520/aemnp.2022.018
