identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
A04D416E520FFF9AFF1DD963FC3BF90C.text	A04D416E520FFF9AFF1DD963FC3BF90C.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Apochinomma dolosum Simon 1897	<div><p>Apochinomma dolosum Simon, 1897</p><p>Fig. 1</p><p>Apochinomma dolosum Simon, 1897a: 261 (♀); Majumder &amp; Tikader, 1991: 158, figs 334–337 (♀).</p><p>Type material. Syntypes 2♀ from INDIA: Uttarakhand: <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=78.01667&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=30.3" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 78.01667/lat 30.3)">Dehradun</a> (=Dehra-Dun) (30°18’N, 78°01’E; 656 m a.s.l.), leg. M.A. Smythies, date unknown, MNHN 13446, examined based on photographs .</p><p>Diagnosis. Females of A. dolosum are similar to the females of A. malkini Haddad, 2013, as both have copulatory openings at the midpoint of the epigyne, but can be separated from the latter by obliquely oriented rims of the copulatory openings (vs. comma-shaped in A. malkini) (compare Fig. 1B with Haddad 2013: fig. 12C).</p><p>Description. For description of the female, see Simon (1897a).</p><p>Supplementary description. Female. Dorsal scutum of opisthosoma small, restricted anteriorly (Fig. 1A). Epigyne (Fig. 1B): epigynal plate triangular, with W-shaped posterior margin. Copulatory openings large, with obliquely orientated lateral rims.</p><p>Male. Unknown.</p><p>Remarks. Apochinomma dolosum is distinct from A. nitidum, as it has oblique lateral rims of copulatory openings, which are C-shaped in A. nitidum (compare Fig. 1B with Fig. 3H–I, K), and thus it could not be a synonym of A. nitidum, as doubted by Deeleman-Reinhold (2001).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A04D416E520FFF9AFF1DD963FC3BF90C	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Sankaran, Pradeep M.	Sankaran, Pradeep M. (2021): A review of the Indian species of Apochinomma Pavesi, 1881 and Corinnomma Karsch, 1880, synonymy of Castianeira quadrimaculata Reimoser, 1934, and a catalogue of the Indian corinnid fauna (Arachnida: Araneae). Zootaxa 5072 (6): 541-559, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5072.6.3
A04D416E520FFF9AFF1DDE58FC2CFBD1.text	A04D416E520FFF9AFF1DDE58FC2CFBD1.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Apochinomma Pavesi 1881	<div><p>Apochinomma Pavesi, 1881</p><p>Type species. Apochinomma formicaeforme Pavesi, 1881, by original designation.</p><p>Diagnosis. For genus description and diagnosis, see Haddad (2013).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A04D416E520FFF9AFF1DDE58FC2CFBD1	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Sankaran, Pradeep M.	Sankaran, Pradeep M. (2021): A review of the Indian species of Apochinomma Pavesi, 1881 and Corinnomma Karsch, 1880, synonymy of Castianeira quadrimaculata Reimoser, 1934, and a catalogue of the Indian corinnid fauna (Arachnida: Araneae). Zootaxa 5072 (6): 541-559, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5072.6.3
A04D416E520CFF9CFF1DD985FC84FDE7.text	A04D416E520CFF9CFF1DD985FC84FDE7.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Apochinomma nitidum (Thorell 1895)	<div><p>Apochinomma nitidum (Thorell, 1895)</p><p>Figs 2–5</p><p>Tyrrhus nitidus Thorell, 1895: 39 (subadult ♀).</p><p>Tyrrhus ambiguus Thorell, 1897: 238 (♂).</p><p>Apochinomma nitidum Simon, 1897b: 169; Gravely, 1931: 276 (immature ♀); Deeleman-Reinhold, 2001: 327, figs 482–485 (♂ ♀).</p><p>Apochinomma ambiguum Simon, 1897b: 169 .</p><p>Corinnomma rufofuscum Reimoser, 1934: 491, fig. 14 (♀) syn. nov.</p><p>Type material. T. nitidus. Holotype subadult ♀ from MYANMAR: <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=95.76667&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=17.633333" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 95.76667/lat 17.633333)">Tharrawaddy</a> (=Tharrawaddi) (17°38’N, 95°46’E; 15 m a.s.l.), collector unknown, date unknown, repository NHM (register number unknown), not examined (illustrations of the male and female genitalia given in Deeleman-Reinhold [2001: figs 483–485] are diagnostic and were used for comparative purposes).</p><p>C. rufofuscum . Syntypes 2♀ from INDIA: Tamil Nadu: Nilgiri: <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=76.584335&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=11.582973" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 76.584335/lat 11.582973)">Mudumalai</a> (11°34’58.7’’N, 76°35’03.6’’E; 894 m a.s.l.), leg. J. Carl and K. Escher, 1926-1927, repository MHNG (no register number specified), examined based on photographs .</p><p>Other material examined. INDIA: Kerala: Thrissur, Chimmony Wildlife Sanctuary (10°25’06.80’’N, 76°32’07.25’’E; 709 m a.s.l.), 31 May 2013, leg. M.S. Pradeep, from ground, by hand: 2♀, 1 subadult ♂ (brown morph) (ADSH2241); Kottayam, Pala, <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=76.71345&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=9.709894" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 76.71345/lat 9.709894)">Areeppara in Edappady</a> (09°42’35.62’’N, 76°42’48.42’’E; 27 m a.s.l.), 5 June 2017, leg. M.S. Pradeep, from ground, by hand: 2♀ (black morph) (ADSH2242) .</p><p>Diagnosis. Within Apochinomma, A. nitidum is unique and differs from other known species by more closely arranged posterior eyes (vs. posterior eyes separated by&gt;2x their diameter in other Apochinomma species) and slightly recurved PER (vs. strongly recurved in other Apochinomma species) (compare Fig. 2A–D with Haddad 2013 a: fig. 4A–B).</p><p>Redescription (brown morph). Female in alcohol (Figs 2A–B, 3A–F). Carapace, clypeus, chelicerae, sternum, scuta, sclerites brownish; eye region brownish, with black shades; endites and labium pale brownish; leg segments pale brownish to brownish, with black shades; palp segments pale brownish, with black shades; opisthosoma greyishblack; spinnerets greyish. Carapace rugose, clothed with fine white appressed hairs. Fovea longitudinal, straight (Fig. 2A–B). AME black. Clypeus height equal to one and half times AME diameter, provided with a few hairs. Cheliceral pro- and retromargins provided with series of hairs having slightly bent tips (Fig. 3B); promargin with three teeth, proximal slightly separated from median and distal that are closely spaced, median largest, proximal and distal small and subequal (Fig. 3B); retromargin with two equally sized teeth, proximal large, distal moderate (Fig. 3B). Endites with well-developed scopulae, anterior margin with serrula (Fig. 3A, arrow 1). Sternum rugose, clothed with scattered long hairs, with coxal and intercoxal extensions; intercoxal extensions fused with carapace. Pedicel short, with collar (Fig. 3E). Opisthosoma tubular, with slight median constriction (Fig. 2A–B), clothed with fine hairs; dorsal scutum nearly oval, occupying anterior half of opisthosoma, unfused with collar (Figs 2A–B, 3F); epigastric scutum fused with collar (Fig. 3E–F); post-epigastric sclerites narrow (Fig. 3E); first lateral sclerite small, patch-like, second dot-like, inconspicuous (Fig. 3F). Femur III–IV provided with distoventral constriction (Fig. 3C–D, arrows 2 &amp; 3). Body length 6.85. Carapace length 3.45, width 1.93. Opisthosoma length 3.40, width 1.65. Eye diameters: ALE 0.09, AME 0.15, PLE 0.14, PME 0.12. Eye interdistances: AME–ALE 0.03, AME–AME 0.08, AME–PME 0.15, ALE–PLE 0.21, PME–PLE 0.17, PME–PME 0.20. Clypeus height at AMEs 0.22, at ALEs 0.19. Length of chelicerae 1.02. Measurements of palp and legs: palp 3.07 [0.87, 0.43, 0.63, 1.14], I 7.63 [2.05, 0.75, 1.87, 1.70, 1.26], II 7.28 [1.99, 0.75, 1.72, 1.66, 1.16], III 6.77 [1.86, 0.72, 1.54, 1.74, 0.91], IV 9.95 [2.68, 0.84, 2.46, 2.83, 1.14]. Leg formula: 4123. Spination of palp: femur do 2 v 5, patella pld 1 do 1, tibia do 2 rl 1 rld 1, tarsus plv 1 rl 1 rld 1 rlv 1; legs: femur I pld 1 do 3, II do 3, III–IV pld 2 do 3; patella I–IV spineless; tibia I plv 3 rlv 2, II plv 2 rlv 2, III pl 2 plv 2 rlv 1, IV pl 2 plv 3 rld 2 rlv 2; metatarsus I–II plv 2 rlv 2, III pld 2 plv 3 rld 1 rlv 3 vt 1, IV pld 3 plv 3 rld 3 rlv 3; tarsus I–IV spineless. Genitalia (Fig. 3H–J): epigynal plate triangular, weakly sclerotised, with convex posterior margin (Fig. 3H–I). Copulatory openings with laterally oriented, C-shaped rims, medially placed (Fig. 3H–I). Copulatory ducts short, as wide as long, initially directed dorsally before bending transversely towards midline, opening into anterior spermathecae II (Fig. 3J). Spermathecae I and II pear-shaped, contiguous, leaving small median separation (Fig. 3J). Fertilisation ducts small, diverging (Fig. 3J).</p><p>Black morph. Female in alcohol (Figs 2D, 3G). In all details like the female of brown morph except the following: carapace, eye region, clypeus, chelicerae, endites, labium, sternum black; scuta, spinnerets brownishblack; leg segments black to straw-coloured, with white bands, particularly on femora; palp segments black to straw-coloured; opisthosoma black, with broad transverse white bands. Opisthosoma pear-shaped, with slight distal constriction (Fig. 2D). Body length 6.83. Carapace length 3.38, width 1.96. Opisthosoma length 3.45, width 2.18. Eye diameters: ALE 0.10, AME 0.16, PLE 0.14, PME 0.13. Eye interdistances: AME–ALE 0.03, AME–AME 0.12, AME–PME 0.12, ALE–PLE 0.14, PME–PLE 0.10, PME–PME 0.16. Clypeus height at AMEs 0.19, at ALEs 0.17. Length of chelicerae 0.89. Measurements of palp and legs: palp 2.95 [0.84, 0.39, 0.59, 1.13], I 6.96 [1.89, 0.65, 1.76, 1.50, 1.16], II 6.65 [1.83, 0.68, 1.57, 1.52, 1.05], III 6.19 [1.71, 0.67, 1.41, 1.56, 0.84], IV 9.46 [2.51, 0.82, 2.31, 2.72, 1.10]. Spination of palp: tarsus pl 1 pld 1 plv 1 rld 1 rlv 1; legs: femur I pl 1 pld 1 do 2, II pld 1 do 2, III–IV pld 1 do 3; tibia I–II plv 3 rlv 3, III pl 2 plv 2 rld 2 rlv 2; metatarsus III pld 3 plv 2 rld 2 rlv 3 vt 1, IV pld 3 plv 4 rld 3 rlv 2 vt 1. Genitalia as in Figs 3K–L, 4A–B.</p><p>Male. For description and illustrations of the male, see Deeleman-Reinhold (2001). Colouration of subadult male brown morph in Fig. 2C.</p><p>Variation. Female (n=4): body length 6.27–6.85.</p><p>Justification of the transfer and synonymy of C. rufofuscum . Reimoser (1934) described C. rufofuscum based on female specimens collected from Tamil Nadu. Detailed examination of the syntypes of this species shows that it has all the diagnostic features of A. nitidum, including slightly recurved PER, elongate prosoma with a median constriction and oval opisthosoma (Fig. 5A–B). Further examination shows that C. rufofuscum shares features with A. nitidum as described and illustrated in Deeleman-Reinhold (2001: fig. 484): abdomen with small dorsal scutum, laterally oriented, C-shaped rims of copulatory openings and pear-shaped spermathecae I and II (compare Fig. 5C–D with Deeleman-Reinhold 2001: fig. 484). Based on these observations, I propose to consider C. rufofuscum as a junior synonym of A. nitidum .</p><p>Remarks. In contrast to Reimoser (1934), who mentioned only a single specimen of C. rufofuscum, the MHNG collection has two female specimens labelled as ‘type’; both represent the syntypes (P. Schwendinger, pers. comm.) (Fig. 5A). This is the first record of A. nitidum from India.</p><p>Note. The inclusion of A. nitidum in Apochinomma is doubtful, as the shape of its carapace, more closely positioned eyes and only slightly recurved PER are unique among other known Apochinomma species, indicating that A. nitidum may be a member of an unknown genus (C. Haddad, pers. comm.). However, this can only be confirmed after revising the Asian species of Apochinomma .</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A04D416E520CFF9CFF1DD985FC84FDE7	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Sankaran, Pradeep M.	Sankaran, Pradeep M. (2021): A review of the Indian species of Apochinomma Pavesi, 1881 and Corinnomma Karsch, 1880, synonymy of Castianeira quadrimaculata Reimoser, 1934, and a catalogue of the Indian corinnid fauna (Arachnida: Araneae). Zootaxa 5072 (6): 541-559, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5072.6.3
A04D416E5209FF9CFF1DDEBBFE3DFA24.text	A04D416E5209FF9CFF1DDEBBFE3DFA24.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Corinnomma comulatum Thorell 1891	<div><p>Corinnomma comulatum Thorell, 1891</p><p>Fig. 6</p><p>Corinnomma comulatum Thorell, 1891: 23 (♀).</p><p>Type material. Holotype ♀ from INDIA: Nicobar Islands (southern groups), collector unknown, 1845-1847 (the Galathea Expedition), repository ZMUC (zmuc00013079), examined based on photographs.</p><p>Diagnosis. Females of C. comulatum are closely related to the females of C. severum (Thorell, 1877), as both have mediolaterally placed copulatory openings and wrinkled spermathecae, but they can be distinguished from the latter species by the C-shaped rims of copulatory openings (vs. obliquely placed comma-like rims of copulatory openings in C. severum) and proximal part of anterior spermathecae II wrinkled (vs. straight proximal part of anterior spermathecae II in C. severum) (compare Fig. 6C with Wang et al. 2012: fig. 2H–I).</p><p>Description. For description of the female, see Thorell (1891).</p><p>Supplementary description. Female. Opisthosoma oval, with small anteriorly placed dorsal scutum (Fig. 6A). Genitalia (Fig. 6C): epigynal plate widely circular, with W-shaped posterior margin. Copulatory openings mediolaterally placed, with inverted comma-like rims. Spermathecae sac-like, anterior spermathecae II contiguous, with anterolateral extensions, with wrinkled proximal part; posterior spermathecae I tubular, wrinkled, diverging.</p><p>Male. Unknown.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A04D416E5209FF9CFF1DDEBBFE3DFA24	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Sankaran, Pradeep M.	Sankaran, Pradeep M. (2021): A review of the Indian species of Apochinomma Pavesi, 1881 and Corinnomma Karsch, 1880, synonymy of Castianeira quadrimaculata Reimoser, 1934, and a catalogue of the Indian corinnid fauna (Arachnida: Araneae). Zootaxa 5072 (6): 541-559, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5072.6.3
A04D416E5209FF9CFF1DDFB1FBA6FCE9.text	A04D416E5209FF9CFF1DDFB1FBA6FCE9.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Corinnomma Karsch 1880	<div><p>Corinnomma Karsch, 1880</p><p>Type species. Corinnomma severum (Thorell, 1877), by subsequent designation (Karsch 1880).</p><p>Diagnosis. For genus description and diagnosis, see Deeleman-Reinhold (2001).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A04D416E5209FF9CFF1DDFB1FBA6FCE9	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Sankaran, Pradeep M.	Sankaran, Pradeep M. (2021): A review of the Indian species of Apochinomma Pavesi, 1881 and Corinnomma Karsch, 1880, synonymy of Castianeira quadrimaculata Reimoser, 1934, and a catalogue of the Indian corinnid fauna (Arachnida: Araneae). Zootaxa 5072 (6): 541-559, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5072.6.3
A04D416E5209FF91FF1DDB6EFD5CFC5B.text	A04D416E5209FF91FF1DDB6EFD5CFC5B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Corinnomma severum (Thorell 1877)	<div><p>Corinnomma severum (Thorell, 1877)</p><p>Figs 7–8</p><p>Corinna severa Thorell, 1877: 481 (♂).</p><p>Corinnomma severum Karsch, 1880: 375 (for complete list of references, see World Spider Catalog 2021).</p><p>Type material. Holotype ♂ from INDONESIA: Southeast Sulawesi: <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=122.5&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=-3.9833333" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 122.5/lat -3.9833333)">Kendari</a> (03°59’S, 122°30’E; 3 m a.s.l.), leg. O. Beccari, 1874, repository MSNG (register number unknown), not examined (illustrations and images of the male palp given in Deeleman-Reinhold [1993: fig. 16, 2001: fig. 469] and Wang et al. [2012: fig. 2E–G] are diagnostic and were used for comparative purposes).</p><p>Other material examined. INDIA: Kerala: Malappuram, <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=76.20879&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=11.310394" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 76.20879/lat 11.310394)">Akambadam</a> (11°18’37.42’’N, 76°12’31.68’’E; 41 m a.s.l.), 16 May 2013, leg. M.S. Pradeep, from foliage, by hand: 1♂ (ADSH22171) ; Ernakulam, <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=76.55016&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=10.198873" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 76.55016/lat 10.198873)">Illithodu</a> (10°11’55.94’’N, 76°33’00.57’’E; 24 m a.s.l.), 15 May 2014, leg. M.S. Pradeep, from foliage, by hand: 2♂ (ADSH22172) . Tamil Nadu: Salem, <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=78.2097&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=11.774792" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 78.2097/lat 11.774792)">Yercaud</a> (11°46’29.25’’N, 78°12’34.94’’E; 1420 m a.s.l.), 28 May 2019, leg. M.S. Pradeep, from foliage, by hand: 1♂ (ADSH22173) .</p><p>Diagnosis. Males of C. severum are closely related to the males of C. thorelli Simon, 1905 in the general morphology of the palp, but can be distinguished by a distally narrow embolus, which is as wide as long in C. thorelli (compare Figs 7E–F, 8A–C with Deeleman-Reinhold 1993: fig. 27).</p><p>Redescription. Male in alcohol (ADSH22172, Fig. 7A–C). Carapace, eye region, clypeus, chelicerae, sternum, opisthosoma brownish-black; scuta and sclerites brownish; leg segments brownish to pale brownish, with black shades; femora with white patches and bands; palp segments pale brownish, with black shades; spinnerets black. Carapace rugose, clothed with fine white appressed hairs. Fovea longitudinal, straight. Chilum inverted triangular, bipartite (Fig. 7C). Cheliceral promargin with three teeth, median largest, proximal and distal small; retromargin with two equally sized teeth. Endites with well-developed scopulae. Sternum rebordered, rugose, clothed with white hairs, with coxal and intercoxal extensions. Pedicel with collar; collar dorsally incomplete. Opisthosoma tubular with slight median constriction, clothed with fine white hairs forming broad transverse bands and patches; dorsal scutum complete, fused with collar; epigastric scutum fused with collar (Fig. 7B); post epigastric sclerites narrow (Fig. 7B); venter provided with a broad median rectangular sclerite (Fig. 7B); tracheal scutum triangular (Fig. 7B). Body length 11.72. Carapace length 5.81, width 3.78. Opisthosoma length 5.91, width 2.73. Chilum length 0.67, width 0.12. Eye diameters: ALE 0.19, AME 0.31, PLE 0.28, PME 0.25. Eye interdistances: AME–ALE 0.05, AME–AME 0.19, AME–PME 0.15, ALE–PLE 0.03, PME–PLE 0.14, PME–PME 0.32. Clypeus height at AMEs 0.42, at ALEs 0.45. Length of chelicerae 2.16. Measurements of palp and legs: Palp 4.73 [1.55, 0.70, 0.79, 1.69], I 15.54 [4.34, 1.44, 4.17, 3.61, 1.98], II 15.29 [4.34, 1.61, 3.85, 3.51, 1.98], III 13.80 [3.93, 1.53, 3.15, 3.48, 1.71], IV 19.42 [5.43, 1.64, 4.57, 5.80, 1.98]. Leg formula: 4123. Spination of palp: femur pld 1 do 2, patella pld 1 do 2, tibia pl 1 pld 1 rld 1, tarsus/cymbium pld 1 plv 3; legs: femur I–II pld 2 do 3 rld 1, III pld 2 do 3 rld 3, IV pld 1 do 3 rld 3; patella I–IV spineless; tibia I plv 3 rlv 3, II plv 3 rlv 2, III pl 2 plv 2 do 1 rld 2 rlv 3, IV pl 2 plv 3 do 1 rl 1 rld 1 rlv 3; metatarsus I–II plv 2 rlv 2, III pld 2 plv 3 rld 3 rlv 3 vt 1, IV pld 3 plv 3 rl 1 rld 3 rlv 2 vt 1; tarsus I–IV spineless. Palp (Figs 7D–F, 8A–C): cymbium retrobasally with paracymbial spine (Fig. 8B–C; PS). Tegulum pear-shaped, with oblique, weak apical depression, with brown, less coiled sperm duct (Figs 7D–F, 8A–C; SD, T). Subtegulum less sclerotised, prominent (Figs 7D, F, 8A, C; ST). Embolus short, with slightly broad proximal part, first directed retrolaterally and then prolaterally (Figs 7E–F, 8A–C; E), with blunt tip, directed at 12-o’ clock position (Figs 7E, 8B).</p><p>Female. For description and illustrations of the female, see Deeleman-Reinhold (2001) and Wang et al. (2012).</p><p>Variation. Male (n=4): body length 9.24–11.82.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A04D416E5209FF91FF1DDB6EFD5CFC5B	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Sankaran, Pradeep M.	Sankaran, Pradeep M. (2021): A review of the Indian species of Apochinomma Pavesi, 1881 and Corinnomma Karsch, 1880, synonymy of Castianeira quadrimaculata Reimoser, 1934, and a catalogue of the Indian corinnid fauna (Arachnida: Araneae). Zootaxa 5072 (6): 541-559, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5072.6.3
A04D416E5202FF97FF1DDDE1FB97FBAD.text	A04D416E5202FF97FF1DDDE1FB97FBAD.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Coenoptychus pulcher Simon 1885	<div><p>Coenoptychus pulcher Simon, 1885</p><p>Fig. 9</p><p>Coenoptychus pulcher Simon, 1885: 37 (♀); Gravely, 1931: 276, fig. 20G (♀); Majumder &amp; Tikader, 1991: 145, figs 306–310 (♀); Deeleman-Reinhold, 2001: 329, figs 486–488 (♀); Paul et al., 2018: 165, figs 1A–D, 2A–H, 3A–F, 4A–C, F–K (♂ ♀); Caleb, 2020: 15720, figs 5G–L, 25J (♂ ♀).</p><p>Onychocryptus mutillaris Karsch, 1892: 295, plate XI, fig. 17 (♀).</p><p>Coenoptychus pulchellus Simon, 1897b: 174 (lapsus); Green, 1912: 92, figs 5–6 (♂ ♀).</p><p>Castaneira quadrimaculata Reimoser, 1934: 490, fig. 13 (♂) (lapsus).</p><p>Castianeira quadrimaculata Majumder &amp; Tikader, 1991: 143, figs 302–305 (♂) (misidentification); Sankaran et al., 2019: 332 syn. nov.</p><p>Type material. C. pulcher . Holotype ♀ from INDIA: Tamil Nadu: Ramnad / <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=78.833336&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=9.366667" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 78.833336/lat 9.366667)">Ramanathapuram</a> (09°22’N, 78°50’E; 10 m a.s.l.), collector unknown, date unknown, repository MNHN, not examined (illustrations and images of male habitus and palp given in Paul et al. [2018: figs 1A–B, 2A, C, E, F, 3B–D] are diagnostic and were used for comparative purposes).</p><p>C. quadrimaculata . Holotype ♂ from INDIA: Tamil Nadu: Koku Malai (=Kokumalai) near <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=76.98333&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=10.433333" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 76.98333/lat 10.433333)">Attakatty</a> (10°26’N, 76°59’E; 900 m a.s.l.), leg. J. Carl and K. Escher, 1926-1927, repository MHNG (no register number specified), examined based on photographs.</p><p>Justification of the transfer and synonymy of C. quadrimaculata . Reimoser (1934) described C. quadrimaculata based on a male specimen collected from Tamil Nadu.An examination of the holotype male revealed that it is misplaced in Castianeira Keyserling, 1879, as it has recurved PER (Fig. 9B) that is procurved or straight in Castianeira species (Deeleman-Reinhold 1993). Further examination of the palp of C. quadrimaculata shows no distinguishable differences between it and C. pulcher, indicating that C. quadrimaculata belongs to Coenoptychus and is a junior synonym of C. pulcher, in contrast to Deeleman-Reinhold (2001) and Sankaran et al. (2019), who doubted its synonymy with A. nitidum (compare Fig. 9A, C–D with Paul et al. 2018: figs 1A–B, 2A, C, E, F, 3B–D). Thus, I propose to consider C. quadrimaculata as a junior synonym of C. pulcher .</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A04D416E5202FF97FF1DDDE1FB97FBAD	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Sankaran, Pradeep M.	Sankaran, Pradeep M. (2021): A review of the Indian species of Apochinomma Pavesi, 1881 and Corinnomma Karsch, 1880, synonymy of Castianeira quadrimaculata Reimoser, 1934, and a catalogue of the Indian corinnid fauna (Arachnida: Araneae). Zootaxa 5072 (6): 541-559, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5072.6.3
A04D416E5202FF97FF1DD9F6FBC5FA61.text	A04D416E5202FF97FF1DD9F6FBC5FA61.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Corinnidae Karsch 1880	<div><p>Catalogue of Corinnidae in India</p><p>Following this study, the Corinnidae in India now comprises 15 described species and a nomen dubium, belonging to seven genera; 14 species are described from mainland India, while one species is from the Nicobar Islands. Of the 15 species, nine species were described from India, while six species were subsequently recorded from India. The corinnid fauna of India seems to be dominated by the genus Cambalida Simon, 1909, with five species, followed by Castianeira (three species), Apochinomma (two species) and Corinnomma (two species).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A04D416E5202FF97FF1DD9F6FBC5FA61	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Sankaran, Pradeep M.	Sankaran, Pradeep M. (2021): A review of the Indian species of Apochinomma Pavesi, 1881 and Corinnomma Karsch, 1880, synonymy of Castianeira quadrimaculata Reimoser, 1934, and a catalogue of the Indian corinnid fauna (Arachnida: Araneae). Zootaxa 5072 (6): 541-559, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5072.6.3
A04D416E5202FF96FF1DDB6AFD36FF23.text	A04D416E5202FF96FF1DDB6AFD36FF23.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Aetius decollatus O. Pickard-Cambridge 1897	<div><p>Aetius decollatus O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1897</p><p>Aetius decollatus O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1897: 1007, plate LII, fig. 1 (♀); Reimoser, 1934: 491 (subadult ♂); Majumder &amp; Tikader, 1991: 161, figs 338–342 (♀); Deeleman-Reinhold, 2001: 336, figs 496–501 (♀); Sudhin et al., 2016: 490, figs 1A–D, 2A–C, 3A–E, 4A–E, 5A–G, 6A–E, 7A–D, 8A–C (♂ ♀); Caleb &amp; Mathai, 2016: 36, figs 1–20 (♂ ♀); Caleb, 2020: 15719, figs 5A–F, 25H (♂ ♀).</p><p>Type locality. Contained in Sri Lanka (O. Pickard-Cambridge 1897) .</p><p>Type repository. OUMNH (Sudhin et al. 2016) .</p><p>Records from India. Kerala, Tamil Nadu (Reimoser 1934; Caleb &amp; Mathai 2016; Sudhin et al. 2016; Caleb 2020).</p><p>Distribution. India, Sri Lanka (World Spider Catalog 2021).</p><p>Remarks. This species was originally described from Sri Lanka (O. Pickard-Cambridge 1897). Reimoser (1934) recorded this species for the first time from India. This species was redescribed and well-illustrated by Sudhin et al. (2016), based on type and non-type material.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A04D416E5202FF96FF1DDB6AFD36FF23	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Sankaran, Pradeep M.	Sankaran, Pradeep M. (2021): A review of the Indian species of Apochinomma Pavesi, 1881 and Corinnomma Karsch, 1880, synonymy of Castianeira quadrimaculata Reimoser, 1934, and a catalogue of the Indian corinnid fauna (Arachnida: Araneae). Zootaxa 5072 (6): 541-559, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5072.6.3
A04D416E5203FF96FF1DDCACFC7CFD79.text	A04D416E5203FF96FF1DDCACFC7CFD79.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Apochinomma dolosum Simon 1897	<div><p>Apochinomma dolosum Simon, 1897</p><p>Apochinomma dolosum Simon, 1897a: 261 (♀); Majumder &amp; Tikader, 1991: 158, figs 334–337 (♀).</p><p>Type locality. Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India (Simon 1897a) .</p><p>Type repository. MNHN .</p><p>Records from India. Uttarakhand (Simon 1897a).</p><p>Distribution. Only known from India (World Spider Catalog 2021).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A04D416E5203FF96FF1DDCACFC7CFD79	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Sankaran, Pradeep M.	Sankaran, Pradeep M. (2021): A review of the Indian species of Apochinomma Pavesi, 1881 and Corinnomma Karsch, 1880, synonymy of Castianeira quadrimaculata Reimoser, 1934, and a catalogue of the Indian corinnid fauna (Arachnida: Araneae). Zootaxa 5072 (6): 541-559, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5072.6.3
A04D416E5203FF96FF1DDFCBFBDDFAD6.text	A04D416E5203FF96FF1DDFCBFBDDFAD6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Apochinomma nitidum (Thorell 1895)	<div><p>Apochinomma nitidum (Thorell, 1895)</p><p>Tyrrhus nitidus Thorell, 1895: 39 (subadult ♀).</p><p>Tyrrhus ambiguus Thorell, 1897: 238 (♂).</p><p>Apochinomma nitidum Simon, 1897b: 169; Gravely, 1931: 276 (immature ♀); Deeleman-Reinhold, 2001: 327, figs 482–485 (♂ ♀).</p><p>Apochinomma ambiguum Simon, 1897b: 169 .</p><p>Corinnomma rufofuscum Reimoser, 1934: 491, fig. 14 (♀).</p><p>Type locality. Tharrawaddy, Myanmar (Thorell 1895) .</p><p>Type repository. NHM (Deeleman-Reinhold 2001).</p><p>Records from India. Kerala, Tamil Nadu (Reimoser 1934; present data) .</p><p>Distribution. India, Indonesia (Borneo, Sulawesi), Myanmar, Thailand (World Spider Catalog 2021).</p><p>Remarks. According to World Spider Catalog (2021), this species is recorded from India, which is probably based on Gravely (1931). However, Gravely (1931) neither recorded this species from India nor described or illustrated it. Instead, he only mentioned about the type specimen received from NHM.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A04D416E5203FF96FF1DDFCBFBDDFAD6	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Sankaran, Pradeep M.	Sankaran, Pradeep M. (2021): A review of the Indian species of Apochinomma Pavesi, 1881 and Corinnomma Karsch, 1880, synonymy of Castianeira quadrimaculata Reimoser, 1934, and a catalogue of the Indian corinnid fauna (Arachnida: Araneae). Zootaxa 5072 (6): 541-559, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5072.6.3
A04D416E5203FF96FF1DDB2FFC7CF8F8.text	A04D416E5203FF96FF1DDB2FFC7CF8F8.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Cambalida deorsa Murthappa, Prajapati, Sankaran & Sebastian 2016	<div><p>Cambalida deorsa Murthappa, Prajapati, Sankaran &amp; Sebastian, 2016</p><p>Cambalida deorsa Murthappa et al., 2016: 527, figs 1A–K, 2A–E, 3A–E (♂ ♀).</p><p>Type locality. Jnana Sahyadri campus of Kuvempu University, Karnataka, India (Murthappa et al. 2016) .</p><p>Type repository. ADSH (Murthappa et al. 2016) .</p><p>Records from India. Gujarat, Karnataka (Murthappa et al. 2016) .</p><p>Distribution. Only known from India (World Spider Catalog 2021).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A04D416E5203FF96FF1DDB2FFC7CF8F8	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Sankaran, Pradeep M.	Sankaran, Pradeep M. (2021): A review of the Indian species of Apochinomma Pavesi, 1881 and Corinnomma Karsch, 1880, synonymy of Castianeira quadrimaculata Reimoser, 1934, and a catalogue of the Indian corinnid fauna (Arachnida: Araneae). Zootaxa 5072 (6): 541-559, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5072.6.3
A04D416E5203FF96FF1DD863FB82FA65.text	A04D416E5203FF96FF1DD863FB82FA65.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Cambalida Simon 1909	<div><p>Cambalida Simon, 1909</p><p>Remarks. Murthappa et al. (2016) recorded this genus for the first time from Asia.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A04D416E5203FF96FF1DD863FB82FA65	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Sankaran, Pradeep M.	Sankaran, Pradeep M. (2021): A review of the Indian species of Apochinomma Pavesi, 1881 and Corinnomma Karsch, 1880, synonymy of Castianeira quadrimaculata Reimoser, 1934, and a catalogue of the Indian corinnid fauna (Arachnida: Araneae). Zootaxa 5072 (6): 541-559, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5072.6.3
A04D416E5203FF95FF1DDA4DFC7CFEC6.text	A04D416E5203FF95FF1DDA4DFC7CFEC6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Cambalida dhupgadensis Bodkhe, Uniyal & Kamble 2016	<div><p>Cambalida dhupgadensis Bodkhe, Uniyal &amp; Kamble, 2016</p><p>Cambalida dhupgadensis Bodkhe et al., 2016: 99, figs 1–9 (♀).</p><p>Type locality. Pachmarhi Wildlife Sanctuary, Madhya Pradesh, India (Bodkhe et al. 2016) .</p><p>Type repository. SRL JDPSM (Bodkhe et al. 2016) .</p><p>Records from India. Madhya Pradesh (Bodkhe et al. 2016).</p><p>Distribution. Only known from India (World Spider Catalog 2021).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A04D416E5203FF95FF1DDA4DFC7CFEC6	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Sankaran, Pradeep M.	Sankaran, Pradeep M. (2021): A review of the Indian species of Apochinomma Pavesi, 1881 and Corinnomma Karsch, 1880, synonymy of Castianeira quadrimaculata Reimoser, 1934, and a catalogue of the Indian corinnid fauna (Arachnida: Araneae). Zootaxa 5072 (6): 541-559, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5072.6.3
A04D416E5200FF95FF1DDC50FC7CFCC4.text	A04D416E5200FF95FF1DDC50FC7CFCC4.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Cambalida flavipes (Gravely 1931)	<div><p>Cambalida flavipes (Gravely, 1931)</p><p>Castaneira flavipes Gravely, 1931: 275, fig. 20D–E (♂ ♀) (lapsus).</p><p>Castianeira flavipes Tikader, 1981: 260, figs 5–8 (♂ ♀); Majumder &amp; Tikader, 1991: 135, figs 276–281 (♂ ♀); Sen et al., 2015: 71, plate XVIII, figs 386–393 (♂ ♀).</p><p>Cambalida flavipes Murthappa et al., 2016: 533; Dhali et al., 2017: 53, plate XX, figs 201–208 (♂ ♀); Caleb, 2020: 15719, figs 6A–F, 25I (♀).</p><p>Type locality. Barkuda Island, Odisha, India (Gravely 1931; Murthappa et al. 2016).</p><p>Type repository. NZC-ZSI (Murthappa et al. 2016).</p><p>Records from India. Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, Odisha, Tamil Nadu, West Bengal (Gravely 1931; Sen et al. 2015; Dhali et al. 2017; Caleb 2020).</p><p>Distribution. Only known from India (World Spider Catalog 2021).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A04D416E5200FF95FF1DDC50FC7CFCC4	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Sankaran, Pradeep M.	Sankaran, Pradeep M. (2021): A review of the Indian species of Apochinomma Pavesi, 1881 and Corinnomma Karsch, 1880, synonymy of Castianeira quadrimaculata Reimoser, 1934, and a catalogue of the Indian corinnid fauna (Arachnida: Araneae). Zootaxa 5072 (6): 541-559, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5072.6.3
A04D416E5200FF95FF1DDE51FC7CFB45.text	A04D416E5200FF95FF1DDE51FC7CFB45.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Cambalida kambakamensis (Gravely 1931)	<div><p>Cambalida kambakamensis (Gravely, 1931)</p><p>Sphingius kambakamensis Gravely, 1931: 271, fig. 19D (♂); Majumder &amp; Tikader, 1991: 154, figs 326–329 (♂).</p><p>Cambalida kambakamensis Sankaran et al., 2020: 519, figs 12A–E, G, 13A–C (♂).</p><p>Type locality. Kambakam Hills, Andhra Pradesh, India (Gravely 1931; Sankaran et al. 2020).</p><p>Type repository. NZC-ZSI (Sankaran et al. 2020).</p><p>Records from India. Andhra Pradesh (Gravely 1931).</p><p>Distribution. Only known from India (World Spider Catalog 2021).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A04D416E5200FF95FF1DDE51FC7CFB45	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Sankaran, Pradeep M.	Sankaran, Pradeep M. (2021): A review of the Indian species of Apochinomma Pavesi, 1881 and Corinnomma Karsch, 1880, synonymy of Castianeira quadrimaculata Reimoser, 1934, and a catalogue of the Indian corinnid fauna (Arachnida: Araneae). Zootaxa 5072 (6): 541-559, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5072.6.3
A04D416E5200FF95FF1DD9CEFC7CF9D8.text	A04D416E5200FF95FF1DD9CEFC7CF9D8.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Cambalida tuma Murthappa, Prajapati, Sankaran & Sebastian 2016	<div><p>Cambalida tuma Murthappa, Prajapati, Sankaran &amp; Sebastian, 2016</p><p>Cambalida tuma Murthappa et al., 2016: 531, figs 4A–K, 5A–E, 6A–E (♂ ♀).</p><p>Type locality. Dediyapada, Gujarat, India (Murthappa et al. 2016) .</p><p>Type repository. ADSH (Murthappa et al. 2016) .</p><p>Records from India. Gujarat (Murthappa et al. 2016).</p><p>Distribution. Only known from India (World Spider Catalog 2021).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A04D416E5200FF95FF1DD9CEFC7CF9D8	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Sankaran, Pradeep M.	Sankaran, Pradeep M. (2021): A review of the Indian species of Apochinomma Pavesi, 1881 and Corinnomma Karsch, 1880, synonymy of Castianeira quadrimaculata Reimoser, 1934, and a catalogue of the Indian corinnid fauna (Arachnida: Araneae). Zootaxa 5072 (6): 541-559, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5072.6.3
A04D416E5200FF95FF1DDBA5FC7CF876.text	A04D416E5200FF95FF1DDBA5FC7CF876.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Castianeira furva Sankaran, Malamel, Joseph & Sebastian 2015	<div><p>Castianeira furva Sankaran, Malamel, Joseph &amp; Sebastian, 2015</p><p>Castianeira furva Sankaran et al., 2015: 570, figs 1A–J, 2A–J, 3A–F, 4A–C (♂ ♀).</p><p>Type locality. Akambadam, Kerala, India (Sankaran et al. 2015) .</p><p>Type repository. ADSH (Sankaran et al. 2015) .</p><p>Records from India. Kerala (Sankaran et al. 2015).</p><p>Distribution. Only known from India (World Spider Catalog 2021).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A04D416E5200FF95FF1DDBA5FC7CF876	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Sankaran, Pradeep M.	Sankaran, Pradeep M. (2021): A review of the Indian species of Apochinomma Pavesi, 1881 and Corinnomma Karsch, 1880, synonymy of Castianeira quadrimaculata Reimoser, 1934, and a catalogue of the Indian corinnid fauna (Arachnida: Araneae). Zootaxa 5072 (6): 541-559, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5072.6.3
A04D416E5201FF94FF1DDDA9FE96FDD5.text	A04D416E5201FF94FF1DDDA9FE96FDD5.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Castianeira tinae Patel & Patel 1973	<div><p>Castianeira tinae Patel &amp; Patel, 1973</p><p>Castianeira tinae Patel &amp; Patel, 1973: 6, fig. 3a–g (♂ ♀); Feng, 1990: 173, fig. 148.1–4 (♂ ♀); Majumder &amp; Tikader, 1991: 140, figs 292–296 (♀); Sankaran et al., 2019: 332.</p><p>Type locality. Vallabh Vidhyanagar, Gujarat, India (Patel &amp; Patel 1973) .</p><p>Type repository. Unknown, probably NZC-ZSI (Sankaran et al. 2019).</p><p>Records from India. Gujarat, West Bengal (Patel &amp; Patel 1973; Majumder &amp; Tikader 1991).</p><p>Distribution. China, India (World Spider Catalog 2021).</p><p>Remarks. According to Sankaran et al. (2019), this species may be a junior synonym of Castianeira zetes Simon, 1897 .</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A04D416E5201FF94FF1DDDA9FE96FDD5	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Sankaran, Pradeep M.	Sankaran, Pradeep M. (2021): A review of the Indian species of Apochinomma Pavesi, 1881 and Corinnomma Karsch, 1880, synonymy of Castianeira quadrimaculata Reimoser, 1934, and a catalogue of the Indian corinnid fauna (Arachnida: Araneae). Zootaxa 5072 (6): 541-559, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5072.6.3
A04D416E5201FF94FF1DDF5EFF51FB7A.text	A04D416E5201FF94FF1DDF5EFF51FB7A.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Castianeira zetes Simon 1897	<div><p>Castianeira zetes Simon, 1897</p><p>Castaneira zetes Simon, 1897c: 294 (♀) (lapsus); Gravely, 1931: 273, fig. 20A–B (♂ ♀).</p><p>Castianeira zetes Tikader &amp; Biswas, 1981: 73, figs 129–130 (♀); Tikader, 1981: 258, figs 1–4 (♂ ♀); Majumder &amp; Tikader, 1991: 132, figs 264–269 (♂ ♀); Biswas &amp; Raychaudhuri, 2000: 132, figs 1–7 (♂ ♀); Rao et al., 2015: 24 (♀); Sen et al., 2015: 72, plate XVIII, figs 399–403 (♀); Dhali et al., 2017: 55, plate XX, figs 214–218 (♀); Sankaran et al., 2018: 497, figs 1A–G, 2A–E (♂ ♀).</p><p>Type locality. Karachi, Pakistan (Simon 1897c; Sankaran et al. 2018).</p><p>Type repository. MNHN (Sankaran et al. 2018) .</p><p>Records from India. Andhra Pradesh, Assam, Karnataka, Kerala, Odisha, Tamil Nadu, West Bengal (Gravely 1931; Majumder &amp; Tikader 1991; Rao et al., 2015; Sen et al. 2015; Dhali et al. 2017; Sankaran et al. 2018).</p><p>Distribution. Bangladesh, India, Pakistan (World Spider Catalog 2021).</p><p>Remarks. Gravely (1931) recorded this species for the first time from India. This species was redescribed and well-illustrated by Sankaran et al. (2018), based on type and non-type material. The distribution of this species in Bhutan and Maharashtra (Tikader 1981) is wrong, and is due to the misinterpretation of Simon (1897c) and Gravely (1931).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A04D416E5201FF94FF1DDF5EFF51FB7A	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Sankaran, Pradeep M.	Sankaran, Pradeep M. (2021): A review of the Indian species of Apochinomma Pavesi, 1881 and Corinnomma Karsch, 1880, synonymy of Castianeira quadrimaculata Reimoser, 1934, and a catalogue of the Indian corinnid fauna (Arachnida: Araneae). Zootaxa 5072 (6): 541-559, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5072.6.3
A04D416E5201FF94FF1DD807FAEBF857.text	A04D416E5201FF94FF1DD807FAEBF857.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Coenoptychus pulcher Simon 1885	<div><p>Coenoptychus pulcher Simon, 1885</p><p>Coenoptychus pulcher Simon, 1885: 37 (♀); Gravely, 1931: 276, fig. 20G (♀); Majumder &amp; Tikader, 1991: 145, figs 306–310 (♀); Deeleman-Reinhold, 2001: 329, figs 486–488 (♀); Paul et al., 2018: 165, figs 1A–D, 2A–H, 3A–F, 4A–C, F–K (♂ ♀); Caleb, 2020: 15720, figs 5G–L, 25J (♂ ♀).</p><p>Onychocryptus mutillaris Karsch, 1892: 295, plate XI, fig. 17 (♀).</p><p>Coenoptychus pulchellus Simon, 1897b: 174 (lapsus); Green, 1912: 92, figs 5–6 (♂ ♀).</p><p>Castaneira quadrimaculata Reimoser, 1934: 490, fig. 13 (♂) (lapsus).</p><p>Castianeira quadrimaculata Majumder &amp; Tikader, 1991: 143, figs 302–305 (♂) (misidentification); Sankaran et al., 2019: 332.</p><p>Type locality. Ramanathapuram, Tamil Nadu, India (Simon 1885; Paul et al. 2018).</p><p>Type repository. MNHN (Paul et al. 2018) .</p><p>Records from India. Kerala, Tamil Nadu (Reimoser 1934; Paul et al. 2018; Caleb 2020).</p><p>Distribution. India, Sri Lanka (World Spider Catalog 2021).</p><p>Remarks. This species was redescribed and well-illustrated by Paul et al. (2018), based on non-type material. The record of this species from West Bengal, India is wrong as the illustrated species has procurved PER (Majumder &amp; Tikader 1991: fig. 302) and thus not a member of Coenoptychus that has recurved PER (Paul et al. 2018).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A04D416E5201FF94FF1DD807FAEBF857	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Sankaran, Pradeep M.	Sankaran, Pradeep M. (2021): A review of the Indian species of Apochinomma Pavesi, 1881 and Corinnomma Karsch, 1880, synonymy of Castianeira quadrimaculata Reimoser, 1934, and a catalogue of the Indian corinnid fauna (Arachnida: Araneae). Zootaxa 5072 (6): 541-559, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5072.6.3
A04D416E521EFF8BFF1DDDE1FC7CFE2A.text	A04D416E521EFF8BFF1DDDE1FC7CFE2A.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Corinnomma comulatum Thorell 1891	<div><p>Corinnomma comulatum Thorell, 1891</p><p>Corinnomma comulatum Thorell, 1891: 23 (♀).</p><p>Type locality. Nicobar Islands (southern groups), India (Thorell 1891) .</p><p>Type repository. ZMUC .</p><p>Records from India. Nicobar Islands (Thorell 1891).</p><p>Distribution. Only known from India (World Spider Catalog 2021).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A04D416E521EFF8BFF1DDDE1FC7CFE2A	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Sankaran, Pradeep M.	Sankaran, Pradeep M. (2021): A review of the Indian species of Apochinomma Pavesi, 1881 and Corinnomma Karsch, 1880, synonymy of Castianeira quadrimaculata Reimoser, 1934, and a catalogue of the Indian corinnid fauna (Arachnida: Araneae). Zootaxa 5072 (6): 541-559, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5072.6.3
A04D416E521EFF8BFF1DDF7CFD7CFC63.text	A04D416E521EFF8BFF1DDF7CFD7CFC63.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Corinnomma severum (Thorell 1877)	<div><p>Corinnomma severum (Thorell, 1877)</p><p>Corinna severa Thorell, 1877: 481 (♂).</p><p>Corinnomma severum Karsch, 1880: 375 (for complete list of references, see World Spider Catalog 2021).</p><p>Type locality. Kendari, Indonesia (Thorell 1877) .</p><p>Type repository. MCSN (Deeleman-Reinhold 2001) .</p><p>Records from India. Kerala, Tamil Nadu, West Bengal (Gravely 1931; Caleb 2020; present data).</p><p>Distribution. India to China, Indonesia (Sumatra, Sulawesi), Philippines (World Spider Catalog 2021).</p><p>Remarks. This species was originally described from Southeast Sulawesi (Thorell 1877). Gravely (1931) recorded this species for the first time from India.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A04D416E521EFF8BFF1DDF7CFD7CFC63	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Sankaran, Pradeep M.	Sankaran, Pradeep M. (2021): A review of the Indian species of Apochinomma Pavesi, 1881 and Corinnomma Karsch, 1880, synonymy of Castianeira quadrimaculata Reimoser, 1934, and a catalogue of the Indian corinnid fauna (Arachnida: Araneae). Zootaxa 5072 (6): 541-559, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5072.6.3
A04D416E521EFF8BFF1DD96DFB09FA1F.text	A04D416E521EFF8BFF1DD96DFB09FA1F.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Echinax panache Deeleman-Reinhold 2001	<div><p>Echinax panache Deeleman-Reinhold, 2001</p><p>Echinax panache Deeleman-Reinhold, 2001: 365, figs 569–571 (♂); Yang et al., 2004: 68, fig. 2A–C (♂); Marusik et al., 2009: 165, figs 1–9 (♂ ♀); Patil et al., 2015: 5, figs 1–4 (♀).</p><p>Echinax oxyopoides Yang et al., 2004: 67, fig. 1A–E (♀).</p><p>Type locality. Mae Hia village, north Thailand (Deeleman-Reinhold 2001) .</p><p>Type repository. MHNG (Deeleman-Reinhold 2001) .</p><p>Records from India. Maharashtra (Patil et al. 2015).</p><p>Distribution. China, India, Thailand (World Spider Catalog 2021).</p><p>Remarks. Patil et al. (2015) recorded this genus and species for the first time from India.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A04D416E521EFF8BFF1DD96DFB09FA1F	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Sankaran, Pradeep M.	Sankaran, Pradeep M. (2021): A review of the Indian species of Apochinomma Pavesi, 1881 and Corinnomma Karsch, 1880, synonymy of Castianeira quadrimaculata Reimoser, 1934, and a catalogue of the Indian corinnid fauna (Arachnida: Araneae). Zootaxa 5072 (6): 541-559, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5072.6.3
A04D416E521EFF8AFF1DDB99FEB9FF0F.text	A04D416E521EFF8AFF1DDB99FEB9FF0F.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Castianeira albopicta Gravely 1931	<div><p>Castianeira albopicta Gravely, 1931</p><p>Castaneira albopicta Gravely, 1931: 275 (immature/subadult ♀) (lapsus).</p><p>Castianeira albopicta Tikader, 1981: 263, fig. 13 (subadult ♀); Majumder &amp; Tikader, 1991: 138, figs 287–291 (♀, misidentification); Sankaran et al., 2019: 332.</p><p>Type locality. Peshok, West Bengal, India (Gravely 1931) .</p><p>Type repository. NZC-ZSI (Sankaran et al. 2019).</p><p>Records from India. West Bengal (Gravely 1931).</p><p>Distribution. Only known from India (Sankaran et al. 2019).</p><p>Remarks. Sankaran et al. (2019) considered this species as a nomen dubium due to the immature state of the syntypes.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A04D416E521EFF8AFF1DDB99FEB9FF0F	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Sankaran, Pradeep M.	Sankaran, Pradeep M. (2021): A review of the Indian species of Apochinomma Pavesi, 1881 and Corinnomma Karsch, 1880, synonymy of Castianeira quadrimaculata Reimoser, 1934, and a catalogue of the Indian corinnid fauna (Arachnida: Araneae). Zootaxa 5072 (6): 541-559, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5072.6.3
