taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
A633A44EFF92A26BFC67A5FBD787B343.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5439926/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5439926	Figure 1. Map showing the known distributions of Parabuthus glabrimanus sp. nov. (triangles), Parabuthus gracilis Lamoral, 1979 (squares), Parabuthus nanus Lamoral, 1979 (stars) and Parabuthus setiventer sp. nov. (circles) in Namibia and South Africa. Contour interval, 500 m. Major sand systems stippled. Magnified inset shows distributions of P. glabrimanus and P. setiventer in finer detail.	Figure 1. Map showing the known distributions of Parabuthus glabrimanus sp. nov. (triangles), Parabuthus gracilis Lamoral, 1979 (squares), Parabuthus nanus Lamoral, 1979 (stars) and Parabuthus setiventer sp. nov. (circles) in Namibia and South Africa. Contour interval, 500 m. Major sand systems stippled. Magnified inset shows distributions of P. glabrimanus and P. setiventer in finer detail.	2010-06-30	Prendini, Lorenzo;Esposito, Lauren A.		Zenodo	biologists	Prendini, Lorenzo;Esposito, Lauren A.			
A633A44EFF92A26BFC67A5FBD787B343.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5439930/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5439930	Figure 2. See Table 2 for details. The optimal tree retrieved by analyses with equal weights and implied weights under k = 3–6 (Table 2). This topology corresponds to the majority rule (> 50%) consensus of most parsimonious trees (MPTs) obtained by seven analyses in which weighting regime was varied; frequency percentages for nodes that collapsed in the strict consensus of the MPTs obtained by the seven analyses are indicated to the right of relevant nodes. Zero-length branches are collapsed. Solid bars indicate uniquely derived apomorphic character states, whereas empty bars indicate parallel derivations of apomorphic states under accelerated transformation (ACCTRAN) optimization. The number above each bar gives the character number, whereas the number below gives the character state. Branch support values are circled at nodes. Refer to Appendix for character descriptions. The East African species are indicated with asterisks. Alternative topologies for nodes A and B shown in Figures 3 and 4 respectively.	Figure 2. See Table 2 for details. The optimal tree retrieved by analyses with equal weights and implied weights under k = 3–6 (Table 2). This topology corresponds to the majority rule (> 50%) consensus of most parsimonious trees (MPTs) obtained by seven analyses in which weighting regime was varied; frequency percentages for nodes that collapsed in the strict consensus of the MPTs obtained by the seven analyses are indicated to the right of relevant nodes. Zero-length branches are collapsed. Solid bars indicate uniquely derived apomorphic character states, whereas empty bars indicate parallel derivations of apomorphic states under accelerated transformation (ACCTRAN) optimization. The number above each bar gives the character number, whereas the number below gives the character state. Branch support values are circled at nodes. Refer to Appendix for character descriptions. The East African species are indicated with asterisks. Alternative topologies for nodes A and B shown in Figures 3 and 4 respectively.	2010-06-30	Prendini, Lorenzo;Esposito, Lauren A.		Zenodo	biologists	Prendini, Lorenzo;Esposito, Lauren A.			
A633A44EFF92A26BFC67A5FBD787B343.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5439932/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5439932	Figure 3. Alternative topologies for node A (Fig. 2) retrieved by analysis with equal weights. See Table 2 for details.	Figure 3. Alternative topologies for node A (Fig. 2) retrieved by analysis with equal weights. See Table 2 for details.	2010-06-30	Prendini, Lorenzo;Esposito, Lauren A.		Zenodo	biologists	Prendini, Lorenzo;Esposito, Lauren A.			
A633A44EFF92A26BFC67A5FBD787B343.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5439934/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5439934	Figure 4. Alternative topologies for node B (Fig. 2) retrieved by analyses with equal weights and implied weights under k = 3–6 (A) and with implied weights under k = 1 and 2 (B, C). See Table 2 for details.	Figure 4. Alternative topologies for node B (Fig. 2) retrieved by analyses with equal weights and implied weights under k = 3–6 (A) and with implied weights under k = 1 and 2 (B, C). See Table 2 for details.	2010-06-30	Prendini, Lorenzo;Esposito, Lauren A.		Zenodo	biologists	Prendini, Lorenzo;Esposito, Lauren A.			
A633A44EFF92A26BFC67A5FBD787B343.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5439936/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5439936	Figure 5. Parabuthus glabrimanus sp. nov. (A, B) and Parabuthus setiventer sp. nov. (C, D), carapace, dorsal aspect. A, holotype ♂ (SMN 2901). B, paratype ♀ (AMNH). C, holotype ♂ (SMN 2918). D, paratype ♀ (AMNH). Scale bars = 2 mm.	Figure 5. Parabuthus glabrimanus sp. nov. (A, B) and Parabuthus setiventer sp. nov. (C, D), carapace, dorsal aspect. A, holotype ♂ (SMN 2901). B, paratype ♀ (AMNH). C, holotype ♂ (SMN 2918). D, paratype ♀ (AMNH). Scale bars = 2 mm.	2010-06-30	Prendini, Lorenzo;Esposito, Lauren A.		Zenodo	biologists	Prendini, Lorenzo;Esposito, Lauren A.			
A633A44EFF92A26BFC67A5FBD787B343.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5439938/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5439938	Figure 6. Parabuthus glabrimanus sp. nov. (A), Parabuthus gracilis Lamoral, 1979 (B), Parabuthus nanus Lamoral, 1979 (C) and Parabuthus setiventer sp. nov. (D), sternites III–VII, ventral aspect. A, ♂ [AMNH (AH 2164)]. B–D, ♂ (AMNH). Scale bars = 2 mm.	Figure 6. Parabuthus glabrimanus sp. nov. (A), Parabuthus gracilis Lamoral, 1979 (B), Parabuthus nanus Lamoral, 1979 (C) and Parabuthus setiventer sp. nov. (D), sternites III–VII, ventral aspect. A, ♂ [AMNH (AH 2164)]. B–D, ♂ (AMNH). Scale bars = 2 mm.	2010-06-30	Prendini, Lorenzo;Esposito, Lauren A.		Zenodo	biologists	Prendini, Lorenzo;Esposito, Lauren A.			
A633A44EFF92A26BFC67A5FBD787B343.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5439940/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5439940	Figure 7. Parabuthus glabrimanus sp. nov. (A–C) and Parabuthus setiventer sp. nov. (D–F), metasoma and telson. A, D, ventral aspect. B, C, E, F, dorsal aspect. A, B, holotype ♂ (SMN 2901). C, paratype ♀ (AMNH). D, E, holotype ♂ (SMN 2918). F, paratype ♀ (AMNH). Scale bar = 2 mm.	Figure 7. Parabuthus glabrimanus sp. nov. (A–C) and Parabuthus setiventer sp. nov. (D–F), metasoma and telson. A, D, ventral aspect. B, C, E, F, dorsal aspect. A, B, holotype ♂ (SMN 2901). C, paratype ♀ (AMNH). D, E, holotype ♂ (SMN 2918). F, paratype ♀ (AMNH). Scale bar = 2 mm.	2010-06-30	Prendini, Lorenzo;Esposito, Lauren A.		Zenodo	biologists	Prendini, Lorenzo;Esposito, Lauren A.			
A633A44EFF92A26BFC67A5FBD787B343.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5439942/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5439942	Figure 8. Parabuthus glabrimanus sp. nov., habitus. A, B, holotype ♂ (SMN 2918). C, D, paratype ♀ (AMNH). A, C, dorsal aspect. B, D, ventral aspect. Scale bar = 10 mm.	Figure 8. Parabuthus glabrimanus sp. nov., habitus. A, B, holotype ♂ (SMN 2918). C, D, paratype ♀ (AMNH). A, C, dorsal aspect. B, D, ventral aspect. Scale bar = 10 mm.	2010-06-30	Prendini, Lorenzo;Esposito, Lauren A.		Zenodo	biologists	Prendini, Lorenzo;Esposito, Lauren A.			
A633A44EFF92A26BFC67A5FBD787B343.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5439944/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5439944	Figure 9. Parabuthus gracilis Lamoral, 1979 (A) and Parabuthus glabrimanus sp. nov. (B–E), dextral pedipalp chela, illustrating trichobothrial distribution. A, ♂ [AMNH (AH 4397)], external aspect. B, holotype ♂ (SMN 2901), external aspect. C–E, paratype ♀ (AMNH), external (C), ventral (D), and internal (E) aspects. Scale bar = 1 mm.	Figure 9. Parabuthus gracilis Lamoral, 1979 (A) and Parabuthus glabrimanus sp. nov. (B–E), dextral pedipalp chela, illustrating trichobothrial distribution. A, ♂ [AMNH (AH 4397)], external aspect. B, holotype ♂ (SMN 2901), external aspect. C–E, paratype ♀ (AMNH), external (C), ventral (D), and internal (E) aspects. Scale bar = 1 mm.	2010-06-30	Prendini, Lorenzo;Esposito, Lauren A.		Zenodo	biologists	Prendini, Lorenzo;Esposito, Lauren A.			
A633A44EFF92A26BFC67A5FBD787B343.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5439950/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5439950	Figure 10. Parabuthus glabrimanus sp. nov., paratype ♀ (AMNH), dextral pedipalp patella and femur, illustrating trichobothrial distribution. A, patella, dorsal aspect. B, patella, external aspect. C, femur, dorsal aspect. Scale bar = 1 mm.	Figure 10. Parabuthus glabrimanus sp. nov., paratype ♀ (AMNH), dextral pedipalp patella and femur, illustrating trichobothrial distribution. A, patella, dorsal aspect. B, patella, external aspect. C, femur, dorsal aspect. Scale bar = 1 mm.	2010-06-30	Prendini, Lorenzo;Esposito, Lauren A.		Zenodo	biologists	Prendini, Lorenzo;Esposito, Lauren A.			
A633A44EFF92A26BFC67A5FBD787B343.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5439946/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5439946	Figure 11. Parabuthus glabrimanus sp. nov., paratype ♀ (AMNH), dextral legs I–IV, tibia, basitarsus, and telotarsus, retrolateral aspect, illustrating setae, ungues, and spurs. A, leg I. B, leg II. C, leg III. D, leg IV. Scale bar = 1 mm.	Figure 11. Parabuthus glabrimanus sp. nov., paratype ♀ (AMNH), dextral legs I–IV, tibia, basitarsus, and telotarsus, retrolateral aspect, illustrating setae, ungues, and spurs. A, leg I. B, leg II. C, leg III. D, leg IV. Scale bar = 1 mm.	2010-06-30	Prendini, Lorenzo;Esposito, Lauren A.		Zenodo	biologists	Prendini, Lorenzo;Esposito, Lauren A.			
A633A44EFF92A26BFC67A5FBD787B343.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5439952/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5439952	Figure 12. Parabuthus glabrimanus sp. nov., paratype ♂ (AMNH), dextral hemispermatophore, ental (A) and ectal (B) aspects. Scale bar = 2 mm.	Figure 12. Parabuthus glabrimanus sp. nov., paratype ♂ (AMNH), dextral hemispermatophore, ental (A) and ectal (B) aspects. Scale bar = 2 mm.	2010-06-30	Prendini, Lorenzo;Esposito, Lauren A.		Zenodo	biologists	Prendini, Lorenzo;Esposito, Lauren A.			
A633A44EFF82A242FEECA646D2CEB6A4.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5439926/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5439926	Figure 1. Map showing the known distributions of Parabuthus glabrimanus sp. nov. (triangles), Parabuthus gracilis Lamoral, 1979 (squares), Parabuthus nanus Lamoral, 1979 (stars) and Parabuthus setiventer sp. nov. (circles) in Namibia and South Africa. Contour interval, 500 m. Major sand systems stippled. Magnified inset shows distributions of P. glabrimanus and P. setiventer in finer detail.	Figure 1. Map showing the known distributions of Parabuthus glabrimanus sp. nov. (triangles), Parabuthus gracilis Lamoral, 1979 (squares), Parabuthus nanus Lamoral, 1979 (stars) and Parabuthus setiventer sp. nov. (circles) in Namibia and South Africa. Contour interval, 500 m. Major sand systems stippled. Magnified inset shows distributions of P. glabrimanus and P. setiventer in finer detail.	2010-06-30	Prendini, Lorenzo;Esposito, Lauren A.		Zenodo	biologists	Prendini, Lorenzo;Esposito, Lauren A.			
A633A44EFF82A242FEECA646D2CEB6A4.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5439930/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5439930	Figure 2. See Table 2 for details. The optimal tree retrieved by analyses with equal weights and implied weights under k = 3–6 (Table 2). This topology corresponds to the majority rule (> 50%) consensus of most parsimonious trees (MPTs) obtained by seven analyses in which weighting regime was varied; frequency percentages for nodes that collapsed in the strict consensus of the MPTs obtained by the seven analyses are indicated to the right of relevant nodes. Zero-length branches are collapsed. Solid bars indicate uniquely derived apomorphic character states, whereas empty bars indicate parallel derivations of apomorphic states under accelerated transformation (ACCTRAN) optimization. The number above each bar gives the character number, whereas the number below gives the character state. Branch support values are circled at nodes. Refer to Appendix for character descriptions. The East African species are indicated with asterisks. Alternative topologies for nodes A and B shown in Figures 3 and 4 respectively.	Figure 2. See Table 2 for details. The optimal tree retrieved by analyses with equal weights and implied weights under k = 3–6 (Table 2). This topology corresponds to the majority rule (> 50%) consensus of most parsimonious trees (MPTs) obtained by seven analyses in which weighting regime was varied; frequency percentages for nodes that collapsed in the strict consensus of the MPTs obtained by the seven analyses are indicated to the right of relevant nodes. Zero-length branches are collapsed. Solid bars indicate uniquely derived apomorphic character states, whereas empty bars indicate parallel derivations of apomorphic states under accelerated transformation (ACCTRAN) optimization. The number above each bar gives the character number, whereas the number below gives the character state. Branch support values are circled at nodes. Refer to Appendix for character descriptions. The East African species are indicated with asterisks. Alternative topologies for nodes A and B shown in Figures 3 and 4 respectively.	2010-06-30	Prendini, Lorenzo;Esposito, Lauren A.		Zenodo	biologists	Prendini, Lorenzo;Esposito, Lauren A.			
A633A44EFF82A242FEECA646D2CEB6A4.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5439932/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5439932	Figure 3. Alternative topologies for node A (Fig. 2) retrieved by analysis with equal weights. See Table 2 for details.	Figure 3. Alternative topologies for node A (Fig. 2) retrieved by analysis with equal weights. See Table 2 for details.	2010-06-30	Prendini, Lorenzo;Esposito, Lauren A.		Zenodo	biologists	Prendini, Lorenzo;Esposito, Lauren A.			
A633A44EFF82A242FEECA646D2CEB6A4.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5439934/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5439934	Figure 4. Alternative topologies for node B (Fig. 2) retrieved by analyses with equal weights and implied weights under k = 3–6 (A) and with implied weights under k = 1 and 2 (B, C). See Table 2 for details.	Figure 4. Alternative topologies for node B (Fig. 2) retrieved by analyses with equal weights and implied weights under k = 3–6 (A) and with implied weights under k = 1 and 2 (B, C). See Table 2 for details.	2010-06-30	Prendini, Lorenzo;Esposito, Lauren A.		Zenodo	biologists	Prendini, Lorenzo;Esposito, Lauren A.			
A633A44EFF82A242FEECA646D2CEB6A4.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5439936/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5439936	Figure 5. Parabuthus glabrimanus sp. nov. (A, B) and Parabuthus setiventer sp. nov. (C, D), carapace, dorsal aspect. A, holotype ♂ (SMN 2901). B, paratype ♀ (AMNH). C, holotype ♂ (SMN 2918). D, paratype ♀ (AMNH). Scale bars = 2 mm.	Figure 5. Parabuthus glabrimanus sp. nov. (A, B) and Parabuthus setiventer sp. nov. (C, D), carapace, dorsal aspect. A, holotype ♂ (SMN 2901). B, paratype ♀ (AMNH). C, holotype ♂ (SMN 2918). D, paratype ♀ (AMNH). Scale bars = 2 mm.	2010-06-30	Prendini, Lorenzo;Esposito, Lauren A.		Zenodo	biologists	Prendini, Lorenzo;Esposito, Lauren A.			
A633A44EFF82A242FEECA646D2CEB6A4.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5439938/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5439938	Figure 6. Parabuthus glabrimanus sp. nov. (A), Parabuthus gracilis Lamoral, 1979 (B), Parabuthus nanus Lamoral, 1979 (C) and Parabuthus setiventer sp. nov. (D), sternites III–VII, ventral aspect. A, ♂ [AMNH (AH 2164)]. B–D, ♂ (AMNH). Scale bars = 2 mm.	Figure 6. Parabuthus glabrimanus sp. nov. (A), Parabuthus gracilis Lamoral, 1979 (B), Parabuthus nanus Lamoral, 1979 (C) and Parabuthus setiventer sp. nov. (D), sternites III–VII, ventral aspect. A, ♂ [AMNH (AH 2164)]. B–D, ♂ (AMNH). Scale bars = 2 mm.	2010-06-30	Prendini, Lorenzo;Esposito, Lauren A.		Zenodo	biologists	Prendini, Lorenzo;Esposito, Lauren A.			
A633A44EFF82A242FEECA646D2CEB6A4.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5439940/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5439940	Figure 7. Parabuthus glabrimanus sp. nov. (A–C) and Parabuthus setiventer sp. nov. (D–F), metasoma and telson. A, D, ventral aspect. B, C, E, F, dorsal aspect. A, B, holotype ♂ (SMN 2901). C, paratype ♀ (AMNH). D, E, holotype ♂ (SMN 2918). F, paratype ♀ (AMNH). Scale bar = 2 mm.	Figure 7. Parabuthus glabrimanus sp. nov. (A–C) and Parabuthus setiventer sp. nov. (D–F), metasoma and telson. A, D, ventral aspect. B, C, E, F, dorsal aspect. A, B, holotype ♂ (SMN 2901). C, paratype ♀ (AMNH). D, E, holotype ♂ (SMN 2918). F, paratype ♀ (AMNH). Scale bar = 2 mm.	2010-06-30	Prendini, Lorenzo;Esposito, Lauren A.		Zenodo	biologists	Prendini, Lorenzo;Esposito, Lauren A.			
A633A44EFF82A242FEECA646D2CEB6A4.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5439954/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5439954	Figure 13. Parabuthus setiventer sp. nov., habitus. A, B, holotype ♂ (SMN 2918). C, D, paratype ♀ (AMNH). A, C, dorsal aspect. B, D, ventral aspect. Scale bar = 10 mm.	Figure 13. Parabuthus setiventer sp. nov., habitus. A, B, holotype ♂ (SMN 2918). C, D, paratype ♀ (AMNH). A, C, dorsal aspect. B, D, ventral aspect. Scale bar = 10 mm.	2010-06-30	Prendini, Lorenzo;Esposito, Lauren A.		Zenodo	biologists	Prendini, Lorenzo;Esposito, Lauren A.			
A633A44EFF82A242FEECA646D2CEB6A4.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5439956/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5439956	Figure 14. Parabuthus nanus Lamoral, 1979 (A) and Parabuthus setiventer sp. nov. (B–E), dextral pedipalp chela, showing trichobothrial distribution. A, ♂ [AMNH (LP 1269)], external aspect. B, holotype ♂ (SMN 2918), external aspect. C–E, paratype ♀ (AMNH), external (C), ventral (D), and internal (E) aspects. Scale bar = 1 mm.	Figure 14. Parabuthus nanus Lamoral, 1979 (A) and Parabuthus setiventer sp. nov. (B–E), dextral pedipalp chela, showing trichobothrial distribution. A, ♂ [AMNH (LP 1269)], external aspect. B, holotype ♂ (SMN 2918), external aspect. C–E, paratype ♀ (AMNH), external (C), ventral (D), and internal (E) aspects. Scale bar = 1 mm.	2010-06-30	Prendini, Lorenzo;Esposito, Lauren A.		Zenodo	biologists	Prendini, Lorenzo;Esposito, Lauren A.			
A633A44EFF82A242FEECA646D2CEB6A4.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5439960/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5439960	Figure 15. Parabuthus setiventer sp. nov., paratype ♀ (AMNH), dextral pedipalp patella and femur, illustrating trichobothrial distribution. A, patella, dorsal aspect. B, patella, external aspect. C, femur, dorsal aspect. Scale bar = 1 mm.	Figure 15. Parabuthus setiventer sp. nov., paratype ♀ (AMNH), dextral pedipalp patella and femur, illustrating trichobothrial distribution. A, patella, dorsal aspect. B, patella, external aspect. C, femur, dorsal aspect. Scale bar = 1 mm.	2010-06-30	Prendini, Lorenzo;Esposito, Lauren A.		Zenodo	biologists	Prendini, Lorenzo;Esposito, Lauren A.			
A633A44EFF82A242FEECA646D2CEB6A4.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5439958/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5439958	Figure 16. Parabuthus setiventer sp. nov., paratype ♀ (AMNH), dextral legs I–IV, tibia, basitarsus, and telotarsus, retrolateral aspect, illustrating setae, ungues, and spurs. A, leg I. B, leg II. C, leg III. D, leg IV. Scale bar = 1 mm.	Figure 16. Parabuthus setiventer sp. nov., paratype ♀ (AMNH), dextral legs I–IV, tibia, basitarsus, and telotarsus, retrolateral aspect, illustrating setae, ungues, and spurs. A, leg I. B, leg II. C, leg III. D, leg IV. Scale bar = 1 mm.	2010-06-30	Prendini, Lorenzo;Esposito, Lauren A.		Zenodo	biologists	Prendini, Lorenzo;Esposito, Lauren A.			
A633A44EFF82A242FEECA646D2CEB6A4.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5439962/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5439962	Figure 17. Parabuthus setiventer sp. nov., paratype ♂ (AMNH), dextral hemispermatophore, ental (A) and ectal (B) aspects. Scale bar = 2 mm.	Figure 17. Parabuthus setiventer sp. nov., paratype ♂ (AMNH), dextral hemispermatophore, ental (A) and ectal (B) aspects. Scale bar = 2 mm.	2010-06-30	Prendini, Lorenzo;Esposito, Lauren A.		Zenodo	biologists	Prendini, Lorenzo;Esposito, Lauren A.			
