identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
0EC6A51A94AA5CB98FA4658FD72E8409.text	0EC6A51A94AA5CB98FA4658FD72E8409.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Cyclocypris pangi Yu & Ma & Wang & Zhai 2022	<div><p>Cyclocypris pangi sp. nov.</p><p>Figs 4, 5, 6</p><p>Cyclocypris sp. - Zhai et al. 2017: 485, fig. 8.</p><p>Type locality.</p><p>A pond (Y34, Table 1) in Beijing, China.</p><p>Type material.</p><p>Holotype: one male (dyzoc559). Allotype: one female (dyzoc558). Paratypes: two females (dyzoc560, dyzoc561) and two males (dyzoc562, dyzoc563). All from the type locality, dissected, valves preserved on the micropalaeontological slides.</p><p>Other material.</p><p>One female (dyzoc675), from the site Y30 (Table 1), with soft parts dissected and valves preserved on a micropalaeontological slide. Two undissected specimens (dyzoc816, dyzoc817), from the site Y30 (Table 1), preserved dry on the micropalaeontological slides.</p><p>Etymology.</p><p>This species is named in the honour of Prof. Qiqing Pang (Hebei GEO University, China) in recognition of his productive work on Mesozoic and Cenozoic ostracods since the 1960s.</p><p>Dimensions.</p><p>Male, n = 3, LV, length 520-540 μm, height 355-387 μm . Female, n = 4, LV, length 483-558 μm, height 331-390 μm .</p><p>Diagnosis.</p><p>Cyclocypris species with intermediate-sized (Fig. 4A), dark-brown carapace. RV overlapping LV anteriorly and ventrally. A2 natatory setae exceeding terminal claws by 55% of length (Fig. 5B). Prehensile palps slightly asymmetrical, with sub-rectangular trunks, finger of left prehensile palp wider (Fig. 6A, B). L6 e -seta exceeding end of terminal segment. L7 fourth segment with length almost twice of width, h1 short and slightly curved, not “S-shaped” (Fig. 6C). Terminal claws of UR not reaching half-length of UR stem (Fig. 6D). Hp carrying S-shaped structure to interior side of lobe b, lobes a and b with wide distal end (Fig. 6F).</p><p>Description.</p><p>Carapace smooth. RV overlapping LV on all directions, and with one lobe-like expansion ventrally (Fig. 4G, H). Dorsal margin arched. Ventral margin almost straight in RV (Fig. 4D) and only slightly concave in LV (Fig. 4A-C, F). Greatest height near middle length. Posterior end more rounded than anterior. Selvage peripheral along antero-ventral and postero-ventral margins (Fig. 4A). Two inner lists present on each valve (Fig. 4C-F): interior one most pronounced on anterior margin of RV (Fig. 4E), weakly expressed on same position of LV (Fig. 4C, F); exterior one running close to selvage on both valves (Fig. 4C-F) except postero-ventral part of LV (Fig. 4C, F). Antero- and postero-ventral parts of RV each with one blunt peg (arrows in Fig. 4D), corresponding to antero- and postero-ventral sockets on LV (arrows in Fig. 4C).</p><p>A1 (Fig. 5A) seven-segmented. First segment with one dorsal and two long ventral setae. Second segment with one dorso-apical seta and tiny Rome organ. Third segment with one medium-long dorso-apical seta and one short ventro-apical seta. Fourth segment with two long dorso-apical setae and two short ventro-apical setae. Fifth segment with two long dorso-apical setae, and one long and one short ventro-apical setae. Sixth segment with four long apical setae. Seventh segment with three long apical setae and aesthetasc ya.</p><p>Male A2 (Fig. 5B) five-segmented. Five long natatory setae extending beyond terminal claws with ~ 55% of their lengths. Sixth seta extending to end of next segment. Seta z3 long, reaching to end of terminal claws. Seta z1 well-developed and claw-like, slightly shorter than claws G2 and GM. Claw G1 short, not reaching mid-way of G2. Claw G3 very small and seta-like. Claw Gm almost reaching mid-length of claw GM.</p><p>Female A2 (Fig. 5C) four-segmented. Seta z1 shorter than setae z2 and z3, exceeding mid-length of claw G3. Claws G1, G3, and G2 progressively shorter. Claw Gm long, almost 80% length of claw GM.</p><p>Md (Fig. 5D) palp four-segmented. Seta α short and slim. Seta β very short and stout. Second segment with three long setae. Fourth segment with three claws and two setae.</p><p>Mx (Fig. 5E) palp two-segmented. First segment with four setae on outer apical edge and one seta in sub-apical position near outer edge. Second segment with three long and three short setae.</p><p>Male L5 (Fig. 6A, B) palps asymmetrical. First segment sub-rectangular. Left palp with bluntly rounded end and one sub-apical seta. Right palp slimmer than left, with one minute sub-apical seta. Distal end of right palp hook-like.</p><p>Female L5 (not shown, deformed in all specimens examined.) Exopod bearing five soft, thick rays. Other chaetotaxy structures difficult to discern.</p><p>L6 (Fig. 5F) five-segmented. First segment with d1 -seta. Second segment with long e -seta, exceeding end of terminal segment. Third segment with f -seta slightly exceeding end of fourth segment. Fourth segment with two long g -setae, both exceeding beyond end of terminal segment. Fifth segment with short h1 - and h3 - setae and long claw h2.</p><p>L7 (Fig. 6C) four-segmented. First segment with d1 -, d2 - and dp - setae. Second segment with e -seta, not extending to end of third segment. Third segment with f -seta slightly exceeding end of this segment, and g -seta, slightly exceeding end of fourth segment. Fourth segment long, the length almost two times length of width with short h1 - and h2 - setae and long h3 -seta.</p><p>UR (Fig. 6D) robust. Claw Gp exceeding mid-length of claw Ga. Seta Sa not reaching mid-length of claw Ga. Seta Sp short, not reaching base of claw Gp. UR attachment with two long branches.</p><p>Hemipenis (Fig. 6F) stout. Lobe a with wide, truncated distal end. Lobe b shorter than lobe a with wide distal end. Medial lobe h elongated, distally curved. Thin, slightly S-shaped structure with pointed end present to interior side of lobe b.</p><p>Remarks.</p><p>Cyclocypris is the third most diverse genus in Cyclocypridinae Kaufmann, 1900 and contains 21 species (Meisch et al. 2019). Except for C. pusilla Sars, 1895 reported from Afrotropical region (Sars 1895; Meisch et al. 2019), most Cyclocypris species are known from the Nearctic and Palaearctic regions. In China, three Cyclocypris species, C. serena (Koch, 1838), C. globosa (Sars, 1863), and C. ovum (Jurine, 1820), have been reported so far (Chen 1982; Huang 1986; Wang et al. 1995; Zhang et al. 2006; Kong et al. 2013). Majority of those species are known as fossils or sub-fossils, with the exception of C. serena (Kong et al. 2013).</p><p>The new species has some typical Cyclocypris characteristics. It is small, has a rounded carapace and long swimming setae on the A2; besides, it lacks male bristles on the A2 and has elongated terminal segment on the L7 and a long g -seta on the same appendage. The new species is somewhat similar to C. serena in terms of its size, the overlap of RV and LV, smooth surface of the valves, long swimming setae on the A2, rectangular basal segment of the L5, and short h1 -seta on the L7. However, it can be distinguished from C. serena based on the following characters: (1) the lobes a and b, and the general shape of Hp, are much wider than in C. serena (Meisch 2000); (2) the length of the L6 e -seta, the UR Sa - and Sp - setae, the number and length of the apical setae on both prehensile palps of the male L5, all differ from C. serena; (3) with respect to valve morphology, C. serena [0.58-0.63 mm according to Meisch (2000)] is significantly larger than the new species, the inner list on the RV is less pronounced (Fuhrmann 2012), and the exterior inner list is absent. These differences in valve morphology would help distinguish the two species when dealing with sub-fossil / fossil material. The new species can be easily recognised, among the other 21 congeners, by the presence of a small, S-shaped process next to the lobe b, as well as a slender, distally curved lobe h (Fig. 6F).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/0EC6A51A94AA5CB98FA4658FD72E8409	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Yu, Na;Ma, Shunxin;Wang, Qianwei;Zhai, Dayou	Yu, Na, Ma, Shunxin, Wang, Qianwei, Zhai, Dayou (2022): Three new species of non-marine ostracods (Crustacea, Ostracoda) from small water bodies of northern China. ZooKeys 1097: 183-207, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1097.79713, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1097.79713
938C677721D1504BA873F781777834EE.text	938C677721D1504BA873F781777834EE.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Pseudocandona cheni Yu & Ma & Wang & Zhai 2022	<div><p>Pseudocandona cheni sp. nov.</p><p>Figs 1, 2, 3</p><p>Pseudocandona sp. 2 - Zhai et al. 2017: 486, fig. 9.</p><p>Type locality.</p><p>A small shallow pond (Y26, Table 1) in Inner Mongolia, China.</p><p>Type material.</p><p>Holotype: one male (dyzoc567). Allotype: one female (dyzoc569). Paratypes: one male (dyzoc568) and three females (dyzoc570, dyzoc706, dyzoc707). All from the type locality, with soft parts dissected, valves preserved on the micropalaeontological slides.</p><p>Other material.</p><p>One male (dyzoc625) and one female (dyzoc626), both from the site Y30 (Table 1), with soft parts dissected, valves preserved on the micropalaeontological slides. One female (dyzoc813), from the type locality. One female (dyzoc814), from the site Y30 (Table 1). Both undissected, with carapace enclosed, preserved on the micropalaeontological slides.</p><p>Etymology.</p><p>This species is named after Prof. Shouzhong Chen (= Shoutsung Chen; Institute of Hydrobiology, Chinese Academy of Sciences), who was the first among the Chinese ostracod workers to describe soft parts of non-marine ostracods from China (Chen 1957).</p><p>Dimensions.</p><p>Male, n = 3, LV, length 860-872 μm, height 510-535 μm; RV, length 842-849 μm, height 485-513 μm . Female, LV, n = 5, length 874-941 μm, height 526-574 μm; RV, n = 3, length 874-903 μm, height 497-520 μm .</p><p>Diagnosis.</p><p>Carapace sub-trapezoidal in lateral view, relatively short and stout, with hinged part of dorsal margin nearly straight and sloping anteriorly (Fig. 1). Setal group on second segment of Md palp with five setae (Fig. 2D). Right palp of L5 with wide trunk and ventrally curved finger-like end (Fig. 3C). Left palp with elongated and ventrally curved trunk (Fig. 3D). Hemipenis with M-process triangular distally. Lobe a tongue-like. Lobe b shortest, with sub-quadrate distal part on inner edge and triangular distal part on outer edge. Lobe h with rounded distal part (Fig. 3G).</p><p>Description.</p><p>Carapace surface densely covered with small shallow pits in anterior, posterior, and dorsal areas (Fig. 1B). In lateral view, greatest height posterior of mid-length. Postero-dorsal angle of male valve (Fig. 1A, B) slightly blunter than female (Fig. 1E, F). Ventral margin nearly straight. Anterior margin narrower than posterior. Anterior calcified inner lamella wide. Carapace compressed in anterior area and postero-ventral corner (Fig. 1I, J). LV overlaps RV on dorsal, ventral, and posterior sides, and slightly exceeds RV anteriorly (Fig. 1I, J).</p><p>A1 (Fig. 2A) seven-segmented. First segment with two dorsal and two long ventral setae. Second segment with one short dorso-apical seta. Third segment without seta. Fourth and fifth segments with two long dorso-apical setae and one short ventro-apical seta, respectively. Sixth segment with one short and three long apical setae. Terminal segment with one short and two long setae and aesthetasc ya.</p><p>Male A2 (Fig. 2B) five-segmented. Seta t2 and t3 transformed into male bristles, both similar in morphology, each terminating with slightly inflated, triangular process. Claws z1 and z2 long, slightly shorter than claw G2. Seta G3 slim, slightly exceeding end of terminal segment. Claw G1 short, slightly exceeding half-length of claw G2. Claw Gm slightly exceeding half-length of claw GM.</p><p>Female A2 (Fig. 2C) four-segmented. Claw G2 short, not reaching half-length of claw G3. Claw G3 slightly shorter than claw G1. Claw Gm exceeding half-length of claw GM. Setae t1 - 4 unequally long, with t1 and t3 being longest while t4 being shortest. Seta z1 short, extending to ca. mid-way of terminal segment. Setae z2 and z3 extending to ca. mid-way of G -claws but z2 slightly longer than z3.</p><p>Md (Fig. 2D) palp with short and slender α -seta. Seta β short and slender with 5 grouped setae and one sub-equally long accompanying seta on second segment. Seta γ long, smooth, and slender.</p><p>Mx (Fig. 3A) palp two-segmented. Second segment spatulate. Two tooth-bristles on third masticatory lobe smooth.</p><p>Male L5 (Fig. 3C, D) asymmetrical. Right palp basally wide, grading to finger-like end, with two sub-apical setae. Left palp distally narrower than right, with two sub-apical setae.</p><p>Female L5 (Fig. 3B) with long b - and d - setae, and one long a -seta.</p><p>L6 (Fig. 3E) five-segmented. First segment with d1 -seta extending slightly beyond this segment. Setae e and f extending to ca. tips of second and third endopodal segments, respectively. Seta g exceeding beyond terminal segment with ~ 50% of length. Terminal segment with h1 -seta conspicuously longer than h3 -seta.</p><p>L7 (Fig. 3F) five-segmented. First segment with d1 -, d2 - and dp - setae. Setae e and f absent. Seta g long. Terminal segment with short h1 -seta and long h2 - and h3 - setae.</p><p>UR (Fig. 3H) with tiny seta Sa. Claw Gp slightly shorter than claw Ga. Seta Sp slightly exceeding end of ramus.</p><p>Hemipenis (Fig. 3G) sub-ovate in outline. Lobe a tongue-like, with sub-quadrate distal end. M-process with triangular distal part. Lobe b shorter than lobes a and h, with sub-quadrate distal part on inner edge and triangular distal part on outer edge. Lobe h slightly shorter than lobe a, with rounded distal part. Bursa copulatrix elongated with long finger distally.</p><p>Remarks.</p><p>The genus Pseudocandona Kaufmann, 1900, with 72 species described to date, is the third most diverse genus of the non-marine ostracods after Candona Baird, 1845 and Strandesia Stuhlmann, 1888 (see Meisch et al. 2019). [Karanovic (2005, 2012) proposed an alternative taxonomic scheme where Typhlocypris Pseudocandona is treated as a subgenus under the genus Typhlocypris Vejdovský, 1882 and it only contains the six species of the Pseudocandona compressa group, but we follow Namiotko et al. (2014) who redefined the genus Typhlocypris .] The genus, as accepted at the moment, consists of five species groups (caribbeana, Pseudocandona compressa, prespica, rostrata, and zschokkei) and some species with uncertain positions (Namiotko and Danielopol 2004; Meisch et al. 2019). This division is mostly based on the number of posterior setae on the second segment of Md palp. Species with 5+1+ β setae, as well as with the h1 -seta on the L7 being more than twice the length of terminal segment, are classified in the Pseudocandona compressa group (Meisch 1996, 2000; Namiotko and Danielopol 2004), to which the present new species also belongs. Other species of this group are P. albicans (Brady, 1864), P. compressa (Koch, 1838), P. insculpta (G. W. Müller, 1900), P. pratensis (Hartwig, 1901), P. regisnikolai Karanovic &amp; Petkovski, 1999, and P. sucki (Hartwig, 1901) (Karanovic and Petkovski 1999; Meisch 2000; Karanovic 2012). Pseudocandona albicans can be distinguished from the present species by a shorter seta that accompanies the group of the five setae on the Md palp (sub-equally long to the grouped setae in the present species), a much slenderer first endopodal segment of the L6, as well as a slenderer carapace in dorsal view (Meisch 2000). Male bristles on the A2 are absent in P. insculpta (Meisch 2000), which easily distinguishes it from the present species. No other species of the Pseudocandona compressa group has the morphology of the male L5 and the Hp similar to P. cheni . In P. compressa, P. insculpta, and P. pratensis, the lob h is not distally inflated (albeit slightly curved in P. pratensis), their right L5 have slenderer trunks. The lobe h in P. sucki is very wide, while the lobe b is small (Meisch 2000). Pseudocandona regisnikolai is much larger (females range between 1.33 and 1.4 mm and males are up to 1.53 mm) (Karanovic and Petkovski 1999). In addition, P. regisnikolai possesses only one dorsal seta on the basal segment of the A1, setae t2 and t3 on the male A2 are not transformed into bristles, the left prehensile palp of male is much slenderer than the right one, and the Hp bears a conspicuous lobe g (Karanovic and Petkovski 1999).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/938C677721D1504BA873F781777834EE	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Yu, Na;Ma, Shunxin;Wang, Qianwei;Zhai, Dayou	Yu, Na, Ma, Shunxin, Wang, Qianwei, Zhai, Dayou (2022): Three new species of non-marine ostracods (Crustacea, Ostracoda) from small water bodies of northern China. ZooKeys 1097: 183-207, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1097.79713, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1097.79713
929CBCA173FE5866B83CF15A90DEC506.text	929CBCA173FE5866B83CF15A90DEC506.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Tonnacypris rectangularis Yu & Ma & Wang & Zhai 2022	<div><p>Tonnacypris rectangularis sp. nov.</p><p>Figs 7, 8, 9</p><p>Tonnacypris sp. - Zhai et al. 2017: 488, fig. 11.</p><p>Type locality.</p><p>A small pond (Y11, Table 1) in Inner Mongolia, China.</p><p>Type material.</p><p>Holotype: one female (dyzoc575) dissected, valves preserved on the micropalaeontological slides. Paratype: five females (dyzoc576-580) dissected, valves preserved on the micropalaeontological slides. All from the type locality.</p><p>Other material.</p><p>Two undissected females (dyzoc819, dyzoc821) from the type locality, preserved dry on the micropalaeontological slides.</p><p>Etymology.</p><p>From the English word rectangle, referring to sub-rectangular valve shape in lateral view.</p><p>Dimensions.</p><p>Female, LV, n = 6, length 1800-2030 μm, height 940-1040 μm; RV, n = 4, length 1804-2010 μm; height 980-1060 μm .</p><p>Diagnosis.</p><p>Carapace sub-rectangular, dorsal margin sub-parallel to ventral or slightly inclined anteriorly. Peg present on antero-ventral part of LV (Fig. 7C, E, F). Natatory setae on A2 reduced, first and second setae approximately in same lengths, others increasing in lengths towards anterior edge (Fig. 8B). Claw G2 on A2 short, not reaching to middle length of claw G3 (Fig. 8C). Second segment of Md palp with 3+1+ β setae at interior side (Fig. 8E). Mx palp with terminal segment slightly spatulate. Two tooth-bristles on third masticatory lobe of Mx smooth (Fig. 8F). Length ratio between d1 - and d2 - setae on L6 0.41 (Fig. 9B).</p><p>Description.</p><p>Valves (Fig. 7) sub-rectangular, dorsal margin sub-parallel to ventral or slightly inclined anteriorly. When inclined, greatest height posterior of mid-length. Dorsal margin slightly arched posteriorly. Ventral margin concaved (Fig. 7A-E). Anterior end more rounded than posterior. Calcified inner lamella wider anteriorly than posteriorly. Peg present on antero-ventral part of LV (Fig. 7C, E, F). Valve surface smooth, with setae. Carapace sub-ovate in dorsal / ventral view (Fig. 7G, H), with greatest width behind mid-length. Each valve with one outer list running through anterior and ventral margins (Fig. 7G, H, I).</p><p>A1 (Fig. 8A) seven-segmented. First segment with one short dorsal and two long ventral setae. Second segment with one short dorso-apical seta and a tiny Rome organ. Third segment with one comparative long dorso-apical seta and one short ventro-apical seta. Fourth segment with two long dorso-apical and two short ventro-apical setae. Fifth segment with two long dorso-apical setae and two setae (one long and one short) ventrally. Sixth segment with four long apical setae. Seventh segment with two long setae, one short seta and aesthetasc ya.</p><p>A2 (Fig. 8B, C) four-segmented. Natatory setae reduced, first and second setae almost in same lengths, others decreasing in lengths towards anterior edge. Claws G1 and G3 almost in same lengths. Claw G2 short, not reaching mid-length of claw G3. Claw Gm slim, reaching mid-length of claw GM.</p><p>Md coxa (Fig. 8D) elongated and arched, with masticatory processes on interior end. Palp (Fig. 8E) four-segmented. Seta α long and slim. Seta β hirsute. Second segment with 3+1+ β setae on interior side. Seta γ slim and smooth.</p><p>Mx (Fig. 8F) palp two-segmented. First segment with seven setae on outer apical edge and one seta in sub-apical position near outer edge. Second segment slightly spatulate with three long and three short setae. Two tooth-bristles on third masticatory lobe smooth.</p><p>L5 (Fig. 9A) with two a -setae, one long b -seta, one short c -seta and one hirsute d -seta.</p><p>L6 (Fig. 9B) five-segmented. Seta d1 slightly shorter than half length of seta d2. Setae e and f short, not reaching end of next segment. Seta g long, slightly exceeding end of terminal segment. Seta h1 longer than seta h3.</p><p>L7 (Fig. 9C, D) first segment with d1 -, d2 - and dp - setae. Second segment with e -seta not reaching end of third segment. Third segment medially with f -seta almost reaching end of this segment. Pincer organ typical of the genus, with comparatively long h3 -seta and slender, gently curved h2 -seta.</p><p>UR (Fig. 9E) with tiny seta Sa. Claw Gp exceeding half-length of claw Ga. Seta Sp slightly exceeding end of stem. UR attachment (Fig. 9F) with two long branches.</p><p>Remarks.</p><p>The genus Tonnacypris was first established with the fossil species Tonnacypris loessica Diebel &amp; Pietrzeniuk, 1975. T. rectangularis sp. nov. can be identified as belonging to this genus by the presence of peg on the LV [although not all specimens of this genus have pegs, see e.g., Peng et al. (2021)], presence of the c -seta on the L5, a short d1 - and long d2 - setae on the L6. There are nine extant species in this genus (Meisch et al. 2019). Among these, T. angulata Yang, 1985 has been described based on valves alone (Huang et al. 1985), and its generic assignment remains uncertain (Van der Meeren et al. 2009). The new species can be readily distinguished from all other extant congeners by the valve morphology (e.g., long and sub-parallel or anteriorly sloping dorsal margin, and narrow anterior calcified inner lamella) alone, but its soft parts offer additional diagnostic information. According to the length of the swimming setae on the A2, this species was the most similar to T. mazepovae Van der Meeren et al., 2009. But in T. rectangularis the surface of the carapace and the tooth-bristles on Mx are smooth, while in T. mazepovae the carapace surface is covered with superficial grooves and the tooth-bristles on the Mx are serrated (Van der Meeren et al. 2009). The present specimens are similar in valve shape and size to T. tonnensis (Diebel &amp; Pietrzeniuk, 1975). However, in T. tonnensis the postero-ventral part of the valve is more narrowly rounded, and its A1 has a very long dorsal seta on the second segment (Van der Meeren et al. 2009: fig. 8). In addition, the UR attachment is not bifurcated in T. tonnensis . Among the fossil species, the type species T. loessica may resemble the new species in valve morphology (Fuhrmann 2012). Both species have sub-rectangular valves and their anterior calcified inner lamella is narrow. However, while the dorsal margin of T. rectangularis is sub-parallel to the ventral margin or is inclined anteriorly, the dorsal margin of T. loessica is sloping posteriorly. And the antero-dorsal part of both valves of T. loessica is angular, forming an antero-dorsal corner (cf. Fuhrmann 2012).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/929CBCA173FE5866B83CF15A90DEC506	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Pensoft via Plazi	Yu, Na;Ma, Shunxin;Wang, Qianwei;Zhai, Dayou	Yu, Na, Ma, Shunxin, Wang, Qianwei, Zhai, Dayou (2022): Three new species of non-marine ostracods (Crustacea, Ostracoda) from small water bodies of northern China. ZooKeys 1097: 183-207, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1097.79713, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1097.79713
