taxonID	type	description	language	source
AF5D87B34A0EFFD7AF8C1E47C68BF8CF.taxon	description	Synonymy. Marshia albuquerquensis: Herrick 1894: 41 – 43, Figs. 1 – 11, 1895: 136 – 137, Plates XXXI – XXXII, Figs. 1 – 5; Dodds 1915: 296, Fig. 80, 1919: 73, Fig. 10, 1920: 95, Table I; Marsh 1918: 780; Weckel 1914: 201; Willey 1923: 7, 1925: 206; Young 1924: 93.	en	Gómez, Samuel, Gerber, Ray, Fuentes-Reinés, Juan Manuel (2017): Redescription of Cletocamptus albuquerquensis and C. dominicanus (Harpacticoida: Canthocamptidae incertae sedis), and description of two new species from the US Virgin Islands and Bonaire. Zootaxa 4272 (3): 301-359, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4272.3.1
AF5D87B34A0EFFD7AF8C1E47C68BF8CF.taxon	materials_examined	Material examined. Type material: One female neotype preserved in alcohol, USNM No. 1422182; col. Wayne Wurtsbaugh (Utah State University), April 30, 2009; id. Ray Gerber. Additional material: The vials housed in the US National Museum (Smithsonian Institution) that were analyzed are labeled as follows. Supplementary information about the content of each vial and about the collection site is provided. Cletocamptus albuquerquensis, USNM No. 310388; Canada; Saskatchewan; Dead Moose Lake; collector U. T. Hammer, 14 July 1990; identification by J. W. Reid. Notes: This vial contained 13 females and 5 males. Dead Moose Lake surface area is about 10.5 km 2 and has an average salinity of about 30 gL - 1 (Last & Slezak 1986).	en	Gómez, Samuel, Gerber, Ray, Fuentes-Reinés, Juan Manuel (2017): Redescription of Cletocamptus albuquerquensis and C. dominicanus (Harpacticoida: Canthocamptidae incertae sedis), and description of two new species from the US Virgin Islands and Bonaire. Zootaxa 4272 (3): 301-359, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4272.3.1
AF5D87B34A0EFFD7AF8C1E47C68BF8CF.taxon	description	Cletocamptus albuquerquensis, USNM No. 1297024; Utah, Great Salt Lake, Farmington Bay; collector Wayne Wurtsbaugh (Utah State University), June 2, 2008; salinity, 38 gL - 1; identification by Ray Gerber. Cletocamptus albuquerquensis, USNM No. 1297025; Utah, Great Salt Lake, Farmington Bay; collector Wayne Wurtsbaugh (Utah State University), June 26, 2008; salinity, 36 gL - 1; identification by Ray Gerber. Cletocamptus albuquerquensis, USNM No. 1297026; Utah, Great Salt Lake, Farmington Bay; collector Wayne Wurtsbaugh (Utah State University), April 15, 2009; salinity, 20 gL - 1; identification by Ray Gerber. Cletocamptus albuquerquensis, USNM No. 1297027; Utah, Great Salt Lake, Farmington Bay; collector Wayne Wurtsbaugh (Utah State University), April 30, 2009; salinity, 15 gL - 1; identification by Ray Gerber.	en	Gómez, Samuel, Gerber, Ray, Fuentes-Reinés, Juan Manuel (2017): Redescription of Cletocamptus albuquerquensis and C. dominicanus (Harpacticoida: Canthocamptidae incertae sedis), and description of two new species from the US Virgin Islands and Bonaire. Zootaxa 4272 (3): 301-359, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4272.3.1
AF5D87B34A0EFFD7AF8C1E47C68BF8CF.taxon	materials_examined	Type locality. Utah, Great Salt Lake, Farmington Bay (41 ° 3.982 ’ N, 112 ° 13.804 ’ W); salinity, 15 gL - 1.	en	Gómez, Samuel, Gerber, Ray, Fuentes-Reinés, Juan Manuel (2017): Redescription of Cletocamptus albuquerquensis and C. dominicanus (Harpacticoida: Canthocamptidae incertae sedis), and description of two new species from the US Virgin Islands and Bonaire. Zootaxa 4272 (3): 301-359, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4272.3.1
AF5D87B34A0EFFD7AF8C1E47C68BF8CF.taxon	distribution	Distribution. Argentina: Luro lagoon (La Pampa Province) (Pallares 1962), Lucio V. Mansilla and Totoralejos (Córdoba Province) (Brehm 1954, 1965). Canada: Dead Moose Lake and Big Quill Lake (Saskatchewan) (present study). US: Colorado (Dodds 1915, 1919, 1920), North Dakota (Devils Lake) (Willey 1923; Young 1924), Rio Grande Valley (New Mexico) (Herrick 1895), west of Mission (Texas) (Comita 1951), Salt Lake City (Utah) (Comita 1951); Farmington Bay (Great Salt Lake, Utah) (present study), Twelvemile Lake (Albany County, Wyoming) (present study).	en	Gómez, Samuel, Gerber, Ray, Fuentes-Reinés, Juan Manuel (2017): Redescription of Cletocamptus albuquerquensis and C. dominicanus (Harpacticoida: Canthocamptidae incertae sedis), and description of two new species from the US Virgin Islands and Bonaire. Zootaxa 4272 (3): 301-359, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4272.3.1
AF5D87B34A0EFFD7AF8C1E47C68BF8CF.taxon	materials_examined	Redescription (based on specimens from Farmington Bay). Female. Habitus (Fig. 4 A, B) tapering posteriorly; total body length measured from tip of rostrum to posterior margin of caudal rami ranging from 694 µm to 905 µm (mean = 836 µm; n = 7). Rostrum set off, triangular, with pair of setules subapically and with row of spinules distally (Fig. 4 C). Cephalic shield with small spinules along margin dorsolaterally (Fig. 4 A, B). Dorsal and lateral surface of free thoracic somites (P 2 – P 4 bearing-somites) with transverse rows of minute spinules, with short spinules along posterior margin (Fig. 4 A, B). Dorsal and lateral surface of first urosomite (P 5 bearing-somite) with transverse rows of minute spinules, with row of small spinules along posterior margin (Fig. 4 A, B). Second and third urosomites distinct dorsally and laterally (Fig. 4 A, B), completely fused ventrally forming genital doublesomite (Figs. 4 B, 5 A); dorsal and lateral surface of first and second half of genital double-somite with transverse rows of minute spinules, and row of larger spinules along posterior margin of second and third urosomites; ventrally with longer spinules (Fig. 5 A); copulatory pore in the middle of genital somite. Ornamentation of fourth and fifth urosomites as in second genital somite dorsally (Fig. 4 A, B); ventral surface with transverse rows of minute spinules, with larger spinules along posterior margin (Fig. 5 A). Dorsal surface of anal somite (Fig. 4 A) with transverse rows of minute spinules and with dorsolateral strong spinules close to joint with caudal rami; rounded anal operculum furnished with spinules (Fig. 4 A). Caudal rami (Figs. 4 A, B, 5 A) about 2.4 times as long as wide; dorsal surface with sparse small spinules, smooth ventrally except for row of spinules close to insertion of caudal setae distally; with seven elements in all (Fig. 4 A, B, 5 A); seta I small, situated laterally on proximal part of ramus, close to setae II and III, the latter setae longer; setae IV and V fused basally, the former 17 %, the latter 54 % of total body length; seta VI situated on distal inner corner; seta VII situated dorsally midway length of ramus on inner edge (Fig. 4 A, B). Antennule (Fig. 6 A): six-segmented; surface of segments smooth except for two rows of spinules on first segment. Armature formula, 1 - (1), 2 - (9), 3 - (6), 4 - (1 + [1 + ae]), 5 - (1), 6 - (9 + [1 + ae]). Antenna (Fig. 6 B, B’): with small coxa ornamented with spinules as shown. Allobasis with two abexopodal setae. Free endopodal segment with inner strong spinules proximally and subdistally; with two lateral inner spines and a slender seta, and five distal elements, two of them geniculate. Exopod small, one-segmented; with few spinules and with 3 somewhat stiff and thick small setae (indicated in Fig. 6 B’). Mandible (Fig. 7 A): robust, with spinules proximally; chewing edge with teeth as figured, with one pyriform element and one lateral pinnate seta. Palp one-segmented, with two long setae unequal in length. Maxillule (Fig. 7 B, C): robust; arthrite of praecoxa with two rows of spinules and one surface seta, eight spines and two slender setae. Coxa ornamented with some spinules, with two slender setae. Basis with spinules as figured, with two apical setae. Exopod and endopod incorporated to basis, represented by two setae each. Maxilla (Fig. 7 D): syncoxa with spinules along inner and outer margin, and close to joint with allobasis; with two endites, each bearing three setae. Allobasis drawn into strong claw with one accompanying seta. Endopod represented by three setae. Maxilliped (Fig. 7 E): subchelate. Syncoxa with row of spinules, with one seta on inner distal corner. Basis without armature, with longitudinal row of inner spinules, and with few outer spinules proximally and subdistally. Endopod drawn into long and slender claw with one accompanying small seta. P 1 (Fig. 8 A): praecoxa with three groups of spinules close to joint with coxa. The latter with anterior transverse rows of spinules, and with stronger spinules close to outer distal corner. Basis with inner and outer spine; with median rows of spinules and with stronger spinules at base of exopod near outer spine, between exopod and endopod, and at base of inner spine. Exopod three-segmented; EXP 1 without, EXP 2 with inner seta; EXP 3 with four elements. Endopod two-segmented, reaching proximal third of EXP 3; first segment with inner seta relatively short, barely as long as both segments combined, with brush tip; second segment with one inner and two apical elements. P 2 (Fig. 8 B): praecoxa ornamented as figured; coxa with median row of small spinules and with strong spinules close to outer distal corner. Basis with medial spinules anteriorly, between rami and at base of exopod; outer element spiniform, thin, shorter than those of P 3 and P 4. Exopod three-segmented and ornamented as shown; EXP 1 without inner seta; inner seta of EXP 2 relatively short, nearly 0.6 times as long as outer apical seta of EXP 3, with brush tip; EXP 3 with five elements, of which inner seta 1.1 times as long as outer apical seta, without brush tip. Endopod two segmented, reaching about the middle of EXP 2; ENP 1 small, slightly wider than long, with outer and inner spinules, without armature; ENP 2 about 3.7 times as long as ENP 1, with inner and outer long spinules, with two outer transverse rows of spinules, with one inner, one apical and one outer element, the latter shortest, apical seta longest. P 3 (Fig. 9 A): praecoxa with one row of spinules close to joint with coxa. The latter as in P 2. Basis as in P 2 except for setiform outer element. Exopod as in P 2; inner seta on EXP 2 relatively short, nearly 0.6 times as long as outer apical seta of EXP 3, with brush tip; inner seta of EXP 3 about 1.1 times as long as outer apical seta, without brush tip. Endopod two-segmented, reaching slightly beyond EXP 1; first segment nearly as long as wide, with long inner spinules; second segment with long spinules as shown, with two inner elements, two apical setae and one outer element, the two inner setae shortest, apical setae longest. P 4 (Fig. 9 B): praecoxa, coxa and basis as in P 3. Exopod as in P 3, except for armature formula (without inner seta in P 4 EXP 3); inner seta on EXP 2 about 0.6 times as long as outer apical seta of EXP 3, with brush tip. Endopod two-segmented, barely reaching middle of EXP 1; ENP 1 small, slightly wider than long; ENP 2 about five times as long as ENP 1, with slender spinules, with two long apical setae, of which inner shorter, reaching tip of EXP 3. P 5 (Fig. 5 C): exopod and baseoendopod fused, barely separated by small notch. Baseoendopod with outer seta of basis; endopodal lobe longer than exopod, with outer small spinules, and long spinules along inner margin, with one outer, two apical and three inner setae, relative length of setae as shown. Exopod with outer spinules, with five setae in all. P 6 (Fig. 5 A, B): represented by median plate in anterior half of first genital somite, each vestigial leg represented by two small spiniform setae. Male. Total body length measured from tip of rostrum to posterior margin of caudal rami, ranging from 786 µm to 1033 µm (mean = 899 µm; n = 7). Habitus as in female except for somewhat more clear distinction between prosome and urosome, and for separate second and third urosomites (Fig. 10 A, B); anal somite (Figs. 10 A, B, 11 B, C) as in female; caudal rami (Figs. 10 A, B, 11 B, C) about 2.8 times as long as wide; caudal seta IV and V 20 % and 61 % of total body length, respectively. Ventral ornamentation of third, fourth and fifth urosomites (Fig. 11 B) denser than in female. Rostrum (Fig. 11 A): sexually dimorphic, elongate. Antennule (Fig. 12 A – C): six-segmented; subchirocer; smooth, except for the presence of spinules on first segment (Fig. 12 A 1); last segment with two acute teeth (Fig. 12 A, A 5, B, C). Armature formula difficult to define; most probably as follows: 1 - (1), 2 - (9), 3 - (9), 4 - (8 + [1 + ae]), 5 - (2), 6 - (6 + [1 + ae]). The armature on the last segment arises from a plate-like swelling, it seems not to be a true segment. The nature of this structure as well as an indepth analysis of the segmentation of the antennule deserves further investigation. Antenna, mandible, maxillule, maxilla and maxilliped (not shown) as in female. P 1 (Fig. 13 A) as in female except for dimorphic projection on inner distal corner of basis and for relatively thinner inner spine of basis. P 2 (Fig. 13 B) proportionally shorter than in female and with relatively stouter outer spines of exopod; armature of ENP 2 relatively shorter than in female. P 3 (Fig. 14 A, B) as in female except for relatively stouter outer spines, and for longer EXP 1. Endopod clearly two-segmented; first segment slightly longer than wide, with long inner spinules, unarmed; second segment with inner distal apophysis very short and bent outwards at an angle of almost 90 °, and with two apical setae relatively shorter than in female (innermost shorter); with paired asprothekes (see Discussion for definition) at base of apophysis posteriorly (Fig. 14 B). P 4 (Fig. 14 C) as in female, except for stouter outer spines of exopod, relatively longer EXP 1, and relatively shorter setae of ENP 2. Two-segmented endopod somewhat shorter than half the length of EXP 1; first segment very small, about as long as wide; second segment elongate, about 3 times as long as wide and about 2.5 times as long as ENP 1, with two elements, of which inner shorter, reduced, not reaching tip of EXP 1. Both P 5 fused (Fig. 12 D); exopod and baseoendopod fused; division between rami indicated by slight notch. Exopod with spinules at base of setae of basis; with four elements. Baseoendopod with outer seta of basis; endopodal lobe with outer and inner spinules as shown, with three elements in all. P 6 (Fig. 11 B) represented by plate; without armature. Armature formula in Table 1. Leg P 1 P 2 P 3 P 4 P 5 Female EXP I- 0; I- 1; I, I 1,1 I- 0; I- 1; II, 2,1 I- 0; I- 1; II, 2,1 I- 0; I- 1; II, 2,0 5 ENP 0 - 1; 0, I 1,1 0 - 0; I, 1,1 0 - 0; I, 2,2 0 - 0; 0,2,0 6 Male EXP I- 0; I- 1; I, I 1; 1 I- 0; I- 1; II, 2,1 I- 0; I- 1; II, 2,1 I- 0; I- 1; II, 2,0 4 ENP 0 - 1; 0, I 1,1 0 - 0; I, 1,1 0 - 0; 0,2, Apophysis 0 - 0; 0,2,0 3 Variability. The variability observed between the analyzed populations is shown in Table 2. This variability was expressed in the number of setae on the second segment of the female and male antennule, on the third and sixth segment of the male antennule, in the armature complement of the endopodal lobe of the female and male P 5 (see Figs. 5 D, 12 E), and in the number of setae on the female P 4 ENP (see Fig. 9 C). Canada US Dead Moose Lake Big Quill Lake Farmington Bay Twelvemile Lake (Saskatchewan) (Saskatchewan) (Great Salt Lake, (Albany County, Utah) Wyoming) Total body Female 694 µm to 705 µm; n = 6 - 798 µm to 907 µm; - length n = 7 P 4 ENP Female - - 2 – 3 setae - (see Fig. 6 C) Male - - - -	en	Gómez, Samuel, Gerber, Ray, Fuentes-Reinés, Juan Manuel (2017): Redescription of Cletocamptus albuquerquensis and C. dominicanus (Harpacticoida: Canthocamptidae incertae sedis), and description of two new species from the US Virgin Islands and Bonaire. Zootaxa 4272 (3): 301-359, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4272.3.1
AF5D87B34A1BFFDAAF8C1D85C617F8E4.taxon	description	Synonymy. Cletocamptus albuquerquensis: Lang 1948 (part.): 1277 – 1278, Abb. 508 - 1 c; Wilson & Yeatman 1959: 838. Cletocamptus dominicanus: Kiefer 1934, 1936; Lang 1936.	en	Gómez, Samuel, Gerber, Ray, Fuentes-Reinés, Juan Manuel (2017): Redescription of Cletocamptus albuquerquensis and C. dominicanus (Harpacticoida: Canthocamptidae incertae sedis), and description of two new species from the US Virgin Islands and Bonaire. Zootaxa 4272 (3): 301-359, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4272.3.1
AF5D87B34A1BFFDAAF8C1D85C617F8E4.taxon	materials_examined	Material examined. Type material. One female lectotype (slide 2076), and three paralectotypes (slides 2117, 2118, and 2119) deposited in The Kiefer Collection, State Museum of Natural History Karlsruhe (Germany). Additional Material. The vials housed in the US National Museum (Smithsonian Institution) that were analyzed are labeled as follows (additional information about the collection site of vial USNM No. 306869 is given). The material housed in other collections is also provided. Cletocamptus albuquerquensis, USNM No. 128929; Trinidad; Caroni; Caroni Swamp; collector B. F. Bacon, 1966; identification by T. E. Bowman, 1969.	en	Gómez, Samuel, Gerber, Ray, Fuentes-Reinés, Juan Manuel (2017): Redescription of Cletocamptus albuquerquensis and C. dominicanus (Harpacticoida: Canthocamptidae incertae sedis), and description of two new species from the US Virgin Islands and Bonaire. Zootaxa 4272 (3): 301-359, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4272.3.1
AF5D87B34A1BFFDAAF8C1D85C617F8E4.taxon	description	Cletocamptus albuquerquensis, USNM No. 278085, Accession No. 416030; Trinidad and Tobago; Chacachacare Island; surface water of salt pond; collector A. L. Kong, May 7, 1993. Cletocamptus albuquerquensis, USNM No. 306869, Accession No. 2018756; British Virgin Islands; Anegada, Flaminco Pond; collected and identified by L. Jarecki, July 20, 2000. Notes: Flaminco Pond is described as a typical Caribbean salt pond that seasonally varies widely in salinity (Jarecki, personal communication). Cletocamptus dominicanus, USNM No. 1418187; 25 females and 9 males; Laguna Fraternidad, Cabo Rojo, Puerto Rico; Salinity, 87.6 ppt; water temperature, 31.5 ° C; pH, 8.56; dissolved oxygen, 8.5 mg L - 1; collected by Ray Gerber, January, 2010. Cletocamptus dominicanus, USNM No. 1418188; 14 females; salt pond lagoon at Ensenada Dakity, Culebra Island, Puerto Rico; Salinity, 45.8 ppt; water temperature, 29.6 ° C; pH, 9.23; dissolved oxygen,> 12 mg L - 1; collected by Ray Gerber, December, 2008. Cletocamptus dominicanus, USNM No. 1418189; 22 females and 8 males; Laguna El Padre, Vieques Island, Puerto Rico; Salinity, 32.9 ppt; water temperature, 27.4 ° C; pH, 8.14; dissolved oxygen, 9.18 mg L - 1; collected by Ray Gerber, December, 2008. Cletocamptus dominicanus, USNM No. 1418190; 29 females and 8 males; salt pond at Salt Pond Bay, St. John Island, US Virgin Islands; Salinity, 171.6 ppt; water temperature, 28.0 ° C; pH, 9.2; dissolved oxygen, 7.34 mg L - 1; collected by Ray Gerber, January, 2007. Cletocamptus dominicanus, USNM No. 1418191; 15 females and 6 males; Elliot Pond, San Salvador Island, Bahamas; Salinity, 41 ppt; collected by D. Barr, January, 1994. Cletocamptus dominicanus, six males (ICML-EMUCOP- 010107 - 03, and - 07 to - 11) and one female (ICML – EMUCOP – 010107 – 02), dissected; one undissected female mounted onto one slide (ICML – EMUCOP – 010107 – 01); two females and one male preserved in alcohol (ICML – EMUCOP – 010107 – 04); St. John Island (US Virgin Islands); collected by Ray Gerber, January, 2007. Cletocamptus dominicanus, 15 females (UARC 282 M) and 15 males (UARC 283 M) preserved in alcohol; Pozos Colorado, Santa Marta, Colombia; 11 ° 14 ′ 10 ″ N, 74 ° 12 ′ 6 ″ W; found in a small temporal pond (0.3 – 0.6 m deep); temperature from 28 to 31 ° C; pH from 8.5 and 8.9; observed in both the limnetic region and in the mangrove zone, being more abundant in the latter during the rainy season when salinity was lowest (5 PSU); collected by Juan Manuel Fuentes-Reinés, August – November, 2015. Cletocamptus dominicanus, 46 females and 33 males preserved in alcohol (ICML – EMUCOP – 010815 – 01); Pozos Colorado, Santa Marta, Magdalena, Colombia; 1 ° 14 ′ 10 ″ N, 74 ° 12 ′ 6 ″ W. All other information as above.	en	Gómez, Samuel, Gerber, Ray, Fuentes-Reinés, Juan Manuel (2017): Redescription of Cletocamptus albuquerquensis and C. dominicanus (Harpacticoida: Canthocamptidae incertae sedis), and description of two new species from the US Virgin Islands and Bonaire. Zootaxa 4272 (3): 301-359, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4272.3.1
AF5D87B34A1BFFDAAF8C1D85C617F8E4.taxon	materials_examined	Type locality. Enriquillo Lake, Dominican Republic, not far from the border with Haiti (Kiefer 1934).	en	Gómez, Samuel, Gerber, Ray, Fuentes-Reinés, Juan Manuel (2017): Redescription of Cletocamptus albuquerquensis and C. dominicanus (Harpacticoida: Canthocamptidae incertae sedis), and description of two new species from the US Virgin Islands and Bonaire. Zootaxa 4272 (3): 301-359, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4272.3.1
AF5D87B34A1BFFDAAF8C1D85C617F8E4.taxon	distribution	Distribution. Bahama Islands: San Salvador (present study). British Virgin Islands: Flaminco Pond, Anegada (present study). Colombia: Pozos Colorados, Santa Marta (present study). Dominican Republic: Enriquillo Lake (Kiefer 1934, 1936). Trinidad and Tobago: Caroni Swamp, Caroni (present study), Chacachacare Island (present study). US: St. John Island (US Virgin Islands) (present study), Puerto Rico: Laguna Candelaria (present study), Culebra (present study) and Vieques (present study). Based on our extensive samples from the Caribbean, C. dominicanus is the most abundant harpacticoid copepod in the coastal saline lagoons.	en	Gómez, Samuel, Gerber, Ray, Fuentes-Reinés, Juan Manuel (2017): Redescription of Cletocamptus albuquerquensis and C. dominicanus (Harpacticoida: Canthocamptidae incertae sedis), and description of two new species from the US Virgin Islands and Bonaire. Zootaxa 4272 (3): 301-359, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4272.3.1
AF5D87B34A1BFFDAAF8C1D85C617F8E4.taxon	materials_examined	Redescription (based on material from the US Virgin Islands). Female. Habitus (Fig. 15 A, B) tapering posteriorly; total body length measured from tip of rostrum to posterior margin of caudal rami ranging from 520 µm to 644 µm (mean = 540 µm; n = 3). Rostrum set off, triangular, with pair of setules subapically and with row of spinules distally as in C. albuquerquensis (see Fig. 4 A, B). Posterior margin of cephalothorax, pro- and urosomites ornamented with denticles conferring a serrated appearance (see Fig. 15 C); denticles of P 2 – P 5 bearing-somites coarser and blunt, those of second to fourth urosomites progressively smaller and pointed, of fifth urosomite very small; first (P 2 bearing-somite) and third (P 4 bearing-somite) prosomites (Pro 1, 1 ’, and Pro 3, 3 ’, in Fig. 15 C) with additional row of medial denticles; P 5 bearing-somite with additional row of minute spinules (see Uro 1 in Fig. 15 C). Second and third urosomites distinct dorsally and laterally (Fig. 15 A, B), completely fused ventrally (Fig. 17 A) forming genital double-somite. Anal somite (Figs. 15 A, B, 16 A, 17 A) as shown; anal operculum crescentic medially, with spinules (Figs. 15 A, 16 A); ventral spinular ornamentation as shown (Fig. 17 A). Caudal rami (Figs. 15 A, B, 16 A, B, 17 A) about 2 times as long as wide; surface covered with slender spinules; with comparatively stronger ventrolateral spinules close to insertion site of setae IV and V; with seven elements in all; seta I small, situated laterally close to anterior margin of ramus, close to setae II and III, the latter setae longer; setae IV and V fused basally, the former 15 %, the latter 60 % of total body length; seta VI situated on distal outer corner; seta VII situated dorsally midway length of ramus on inner edge. Antennule (Fig. 18 A) six-segmented; surface of segments smooth except for two rows of spinules on first segment. Armature formula, 1 - (1), 2 - (9), 3 - (5), 4 - (1 + [1 + ae]), 5 - (1), 6 - (9 + [1 + ae]). Antenna (Fig. 18 B): small coxa with outer spinules. Allobasis with two abexopodal setae. Free endopodal segment with inner spinules proximally, with two lateral inner spines and a slender seta, and five distal elements, two of them geniculate. Exopod minute, one-segmented, with one seta (Figs. 18 B, 26 A). Mandible (Fig. 19 A): robust, with rows of spinules proximally; chewing edge with teeth as figured, with one pyriform element and one lateral pinnate seta. Palp one-segmented, with three setae unequal in length. Maxillule (Fig. 19 B): robust; arthrite of praecoxa with few spinules, with one surface seta, with seven spines and two slender setae distally. Coxa with some spinules, with two setae. Basis with spinules as figured, with two apical setae. Exopod and endopod incorporated to basis, represented by two setae each. Maxilla (Fig. 19 C): syncoxa with inner and outer spinules, and close to joint with allobasis; with two endites, each bearing three setae. Allobasis drawn into strong claw with one accompanying seta. Endopod represented by three setae. Maxilliped (Fig. 19 D): subchelate. Syncoxa with row of spinules, with one tiny seta on inner distal corner. Basis without armature, with spinules as shown. Endopod drawn into long and slender claw with one accompanying small seta. P 1 (Fig. 20 A): praecoxa with spinules close to joint with coxa. The latter with anterior and posterior transverse rows of spinules as shown. Basis with inner and outer spine; with median rows of spinules, and with spinules at base of exopod, between rami and at base of inner and outer spines. Exopod three-segmented; EXP 1 without, EXP 2 with inner seta; EXP 3 with four elements. Endopod two-segmented, slightly longer than exopod, both segments subequal; inner seta of ENP 1 shorter than both endopodal segments combined, with brush tip; ENP 2 with three elements. P 2 (Fig. 20 B): praecoxa and coxa ornamented as figured. Basis with spinules between rami and at base of exopod; outer element spine-like. Exopod three-segmented, ornamented as shown; EXP 1 without inner seta; inner seta of EXP 2 relatively short, about 0.5 times as long as outer apical seta of EXP 3, with brush tip; EXP 3 with five elements, of which inner about 0.7 times as long as outer apical seta, without brush tip. Endopod two segmented, reaching about distal third of EXP 2; ENP 1 small, slightly longer than wide, with outer and inner spinules, without armature; ENP 2 about 3 times as long as wide, with long spinules as shown, with one inner, one apical and one outer element; inner and outer elements subequal, apical seta longest. P 3 (Fig. 21 A): praecoxa and coxa as in P 2; basis as in P 2 except for setiform outer element. Exopod as in P 2; EXP 1 without inner armature; inner seta of EXP 2 about 0.4 times as long as outer apical seta of EXP 3, with brush tip; EXP 3 with five elements, of which inner seta about 0.8 times as long as outer apical seta, without brush tip. Endopod two-segmented, reaching distal third of EXP 2; ENP 1 nearly as long as wide, with long spinules as shown, without armature; ENP 2 about 3 times as long as wide, ornamented as shown, with two inner and two apical setae, and one outer element; inner and outer elements subequal; apical setae longest. P 4 (Fig. 21 B, 26 B): praecoxa, coxa and basis as in P 3. Exopod as in P 3, except for armature formula of EXP 3 (without inner seta); EXP 1 without inner seta; inner seta of EXP 2 visibly shorter than outer apical seta EXP 3, with brush tip; EXP 3 with four elements. Endopod one-segmented, about 1.5 times as long as wide, barely reaching middle of EXP 1, with slender spinules, with two apical setae (innermost smaller). P 5 (Fig. 19 E): exopod and baseoendopod fused and barely separated by small notch. Baseoendopod with outer seta of basis; endopodal lobe longer than exopod, with spinules as figured, with one outer, two apical and three inner setae, relative length of setae as shown. Exopod with outer spinules, with five setae in all. P 6 (Fig. 17 A, B): represented by median plate in anterior half of first genital somite, each vestigial leg represented by one pinnate small setae. Copulatory pore in the middle of genital double-somite. Male. Total body length measured from tip of rostrum to posterior margin of caudal rami, ranging from 345 µm to 430 µm (mean = 383 µm; n = 5). General shape of habitus as in female except for separate second and third urosomites (Fig. 22 A, B). Posterior margin of cephalothorax, pro- and urosomites not serrated (not shown); with spinules close to posterior margin of cephalothorax; P 2 bearing-somite slenderer than in succeeding somites; dorsal surface covered with slender spinules. Anal somite covered with slender spinules; anal operculum and caudal rami as in female (Fig. 22 A, B). Caudal seta IV and V 14 % and 48 % of total body length, respectively. Ventral ornamentation of third, fourth and fifth urosomites as shown (Fig. 22 B). Rostrum (Figs. 23 B, 26 D): sexually dimorphic, elongate. Antennule (Fig. 23 A): six-segmented; subchirocer; smooth except for the presence of spinules on first segment; last segment with two acute teeth. Armature formula difficult to define; most probably as follows: 1 - (1), 2 - (9), 3 - (7), 4 - (8 + [1 + ae]), 5 - (3), 6 - (5 + [1 + ae]). The armature on the last segment arises from a plate-like swelling, it seems not to be a true segment. The nature of this structure as well as an in-depth analysis of the segmentation of the antennule deserves further investigation. Antenna, mandible, maxillule, maxilla and maxilliped (not shown) as in female. P 1 (Fig. 24 A): as in female except for dimorphic projection on inner distal corner of basis. P 2 (Fig. 24 B): as in female except for relatively stouter outer spines of male exopod, and for inner seta of ENP 2 reduced. P 3 (Fig. 25 A, 26 C): as in female except for relatively stouter outer spines of exopod. Endopod clearly twosegmented; ENP 1 slightly wider than long, with long inner spinules, unarmed; ENP 2 with inner medial apophysis, about as long as supporting segment, with two apical setae of which outer well-developed, inner element very small, with paired elongated asprothekes (indicated in figure 26 C; for definition see Discussion), without the spinular ornamentation typically found in other congeners. P 4 (Fig. 25 B) as in female, except for stouter outer spines of all the exopodal segments, and relatively shorter setae of ENP. P 5 (Fig. 23 C): both legs fused medially; exopod and baseoendopod fused; division between rami indicated by slight notch. Exopod with spinules at base of setae of basis; with four elements. Baseoendopod with outer seta of basis; endopodal lobe with inner spinules as shown, with three elements in all. P 6 (Fig. 22 B) represented by plate; without armature. Armature formula in Table 3. Variability. US Virgin Islands: The male P 4 ENP may be one or two-segmented (first segment being very small; see Fig. 25 C), being the one-segmented condition more common and is considered here as the normal condition. Also, as noted in Fig. 26 B, the small proximal element can be an artifact due to a slight narrowing at the base of the endopodal segment. Leg P 1 P 2 P 3 P 4 P 5 Female EXP I- 0; I- 1; I, I 1,1 I- 0; I- 1; II, 2,1 I- 0; I- 1; II, 2,1 I- 0; I- 1; II, 2,0 5 ENP 0 - 1; 0, I 1,1 0 - 0; I, 1,1 0 - 0; I, 2,2 0,2,0 6 Male EXP I- 0; I- 1; I, I 1,1 I- 0; I- 1; II, 2,1 I- 0; I- 1; II, 2,1 I- 0; I- 1; II, 2,0 4 ENP 0 - 1; 0, I 1,1 0 - 0; I, 1,1 0 - 0; 0,2, Apophysis 0,2,0 3 Santa Marta, Colombia: The right P 1 ENP 1 of one female was observed to possess a distal spine. The left P 3 EXP 3 of another female was observed to possess two inner distal setae instead of one lateral inner seta. The left P 5 endopodal lobe of another female was observed to possess five instead of six setae.	en	Gómez, Samuel, Gerber, Ray, Fuentes-Reinés, Juan Manuel (2017): Redescription of Cletocamptus albuquerquensis and C. dominicanus (Harpacticoida: Canthocamptidae incertae sedis), and description of two new species from the US Virgin Islands and Bonaire. Zootaxa 4272 (3): 301-359, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4272.3.1
AF5D87B34A28FFEEAF8C18B4C672F886.taxon	etymology	Etymology. The species is named in honor and memory of the Taíno people who were the original inhabitants of St. John Island (as early as 880 BC) and nearby Caribbean islands (Wild 1999).	en	Gómez, Samuel, Gerber, Ray, Fuentes-Reinés, Juan Manuel (2017): Redescription of Cletocamptus albuquerquensis and C. dominicanus (Harpacticoida: Canthocamptidae incertae sedis), and description of two new species from the US Virgin Islands and Bonaire. Zootaxa 4272 (3): 301-359, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4272.3.1
AF5D87B34A28FFEEAF8C18B4C672F886.taxon	materials_examined	Material examined. One female holotype (USNM No. 1418184), one male allotype (USNM No. 1418185), and four female and four male paratypes (USNM No. 1418186) preserved in alcohol; 6 January, 2007; col. Ray Gerber. Type locality. A small (0.36 ha) and shallow (less than 0.5 m depth) salt pond located near the shore of Privateer Bay, on the east end of St. John Island, US Virgin Islands (18 ˚ 20 ’ 16.96 ” N and 64 ˚ 39 ’ 58.40 ” W).	en	Gómez, Samuel, Gerber, Ray, Fuentes-Reinés, Juan Manuel (2017): Redescription of Cletocamptus albuquerquensis and C. dominicanus (Harpacticoida: Canthocamptidae incertae sedis), and description of two new species from the US Virgin Islands and Bonaire. Zootaxa 4272 (3): 301-359, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4272.3.1
AF5D87B34A28FFEEAF8C18B4C672F886.taxon	distribution	Distribution. US Virgin Islands: Near Privateer Bay on St. John Island (present study).	en	Gómez, Samuel, Gerber, Ray, Fuentes-Reinés, Juan Manuel (2017): Redescription of Cletocamptus albuquerquensis and C. dominicanus (Harpacticoida: Canthocamptidae incertae sedis), and description of two new species from the US Virgin Islands and Bonaire. Zootaxa 4272 (3): 301-359, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4272.3.1
AF5D87B34A28FFEEAF8C18B4C672F886.taxon	description	Description. Female. Habitus (Fig. 27 A, B) tapering posteriorly; total body length measured from tip of rostrum to posterior margin of caudal rami ranging from 526 µm to 610 µm (mean = 568 µm; n = 8). Rostrum set off, triangular, with pair of setules subapically and with row of spinules distally (Fig. 27 C). Cephalic shield with fine and short spinules along margin dorsolaterally (Fig. 27 A, B). Dorsal and lateral surface of free thoracic somites (P 2 – P 4 bearing-somites) with transverse rows of minute spinules as shown, with short spinules along posterior margin. Dorsal and lateral surface of first urosomite (P 5 bearing-somite) (Fig. 27 A, B) with transverse rows of minute spinules, with row of small spinules along posterior margin. Second and third urosomites distinct dorsally and laterally (Fig. 27 A, B), completely fused ventrally forming genital double-somite (Fig. 28 A); dorsal and lateral surface of first and second half of genital double-somite with transverse rows of minute spinules, with row of larger spinules along posterior margin; ventrally with longer spinules as shown (Fig. 28 A). Fourth and fifth urosomites as in second half of genital double-somite dorsally (Fig. 27 A), ventral surface with transverse rows of minute spinules, with larger spinules along posterior margin (Fig. 28 A). Dorsal surface of anal somite (Fig. 27 A) with transverse rows of minute spinules and with dorsolateral strong spinules close to joint with caudal rami; anal operculum crescentic medially, with spinules as shown (Fig. 27 A). Caudal rami (Figs. 27 A, B, 28 A) about 3.6 times as long as wide; dorsal surface with sparse small spinules dorsally, smooth ventrally; with ventral row of larger spinules close to insertion of caudal setae distally; with seven elements in all (Fig. 27 A, B, 28 A); seta I very small, situated proximally on lateral surface of ramus, close to setae II and III, the latter setae longer; setae IV and V fused basally, 16 % and 49 % of total body length, respectively; seta VI situated on distal inner corner; seta VII situated dorsally midway length of ramus on inner edge. Antennule (Fig. 29 A) six-segmented; surface of segments smooth except for two rows of spinules on first and third segments. Armature formula, 1 - (1), 2 - (9), 3 - (6), 4 - (1 + [1 + ae]), 5 - (1), 6 - (9 + [1 + ae]). Antenna (Fig. 29 B, C) with small coxa. Allobasis with two abexopodal setae. Free endopodal segment with small inner spinules proximally, with stronger spinules subdistally; with two lateral inner spines and a slender seta, and five distal elements, two of them geniculate. Exopod elongate, one-segmented, with few spinules, with two lateral and one apical seta (the two lateral setae are somewhat rigid and could actually be spinules (see Fig. 29 C )). Mandible (Fig. 30 A) robust, with rows of spinules proximally; chewing edge with teeth as figured, with one pyriform element and one lateral pinnate seta. Palp one-segmented, with two long setae unequal in length. Maxillule (Fig. 30 B) robust; arthrite of praecoxa with few spinules, with one surface seta, and seven spines and two slender setae distally. Coxa with some spinules, with two slender setae. Basis with spinules as figured, with two apical setae. Exopod and endopod incorporated to basis, represented by two setae each. Maxilla (Fig. 30 C): syncoxa with spinules as shown; with two endites, each bearing three setae. Allobasis drawn into strong claw with one accompanying seta. Endopod represented by three setae. Maxilliped (Fig. 30 D) subchelate. Syncoxa with row of spinules, with one seta on inner distal corner. Basis without armature, with spinules as shown. Endopod drawn into long and slender claw with one accompanying small seta. P 1 (Fig. 31 A): praecoxa with spinules close to joint with coxa. The latter with anterior transverse rows of spinules and outer row of strong spinules. Basis with inner and outer spine; with median rows of spinules, with stronger spinules at base of exopod, between rami and at base of inner and outer spines. Exopod three-segmented, slightly longer than endopod; EXP 1 without, EXP 2 with inner seta; EXP 3 with four elements. Endopod twosegmented, reaching proximal third of EXP 3; ENP 1 about 1.4 times as long as wide, barely reaching tip of EXP 1, inner seta shorter than both endopodal segments combined, with brush tip; ENP 2 elongate, about 4.6 times as long as wide, with three elements. P 2 (Fig. 31 B): praecoxa and coxa ornamented as figured. Basis with spinules between rami and medially close to base of endopod, and with stronger spinules at base of exopod; outer element setiform. Exopod three-segmented and ornamented as shown; EXP 1 without inner seta; inner seta of EXP 2 about 0.4 times as long as outer apical seta of EXP 3, with brush tip; EXP 3 with five elements, of which inner seta about 1.1 times as long as outer apical seta, without brush tip. Endopod two segmented, reaching distal margin of EXP 1; ENP 1 small, slightly wider than long, with outer and inner spinules; ENP 2 elongate, about 3.5 times as long as wide, with long spinules as shown, with one outer spine-like and two apical elements; outer element shortest, apical seta longest reaching beyond EXP 3. P 3 (Fig. 32 A): praecoxa and coxa as in P 2; basis with outer seta. Exopod as in P 2; EXP 1 without inner armature; inner seta of EXP 2 about 0.5 times as long as outer apical seta of EXP 3, with brush tip; EXP 3 with five elements, of which inner seta about 1.1 times as long as outer apical seta, without brush tip. Endopod twosegmented, barely reaching tip of EXP 1; ENP 1 nearly as long as wide, with long spinules as shown; ENP 2 elongate, about 3.3 times as long as wide, with two inner and two apical setae, and one outer spine-like element; inner setae shortest, apical setae longest (outer apical seta reaching beyond, inner apical seta barely reaching tip of EXP 3). P 4 (Fig. 32 B): praecoxa, coxa and basis as in P 3. Exopod as in P 3, except for armature formula of EXP 3 (without inner seta); EXP 1 without inner armature; inner seta of EXP 2 slightly shorter than outer apical seta of EXP 3, with brush tip; EXP 3 with four elements. Endopod very small, two-segmented; ENP 1 minute, about as long as wide; ENP 2 elongate, about twice as long as wide, with slender spinules, with two apical setae, of which inner shorter, outer reaching middle of EXP 3. P 5 (Fig. 28 A, C): exopod and baseoendopod fused, barely separated by gap between rami. Baseoendopod with outer seta of basis; endopodal lobe longer than exopod, with spinules as figured, with two inner and four apical setae; relative length of setae as shown. Exopod with outer spinules, with four setae in all. P 6 (Fig. 28 B) represented by median plate, each vestigial leg represented by two small setae. Copulatory pore in the middle of genital somite. Male. Total body length measured from tip of rostrum to posterior margin of caudal rami, ranging from 486 µm to 628 µm (mean = 556 µm; n = 8). Habitus as in female except for clearer distinction between prosome and urosome, and for separate second and third urosomites (Fig. 33 A, B); anal somite (Figs. 33 A, B, 34 A, C, D) as in female except for denser spinular ornamentation in the male; caudal rami as in female; caudal setae IV and V as in female, except for length relative to total body length of 17 % and 61 %, respectively. Ventral ornamentation of third, fourth and fifth urosomites (Fig. 34 D) denser than in female. Rostrum (Fig. 33 C): sexually dimorphic, elongate. Antennule (Fig. 35 A, B): six-segmented; subchirocer; last segment with two acute teeth (Fig. 35 B). Armature formula difficult to define; most probably as follows: 1 - (1), 2 - (9), 3 - (9), 4 - (8 + [1 + ae]), 5 - (3), 6 - (6 + [1 + ae]). The armature on the last segment arises from a plate-like swelling, it seems not to be a true segment. The nature of this structure as well as an in-depth analysis of the segmentation of the antennule deserves further investigation. Antenna, mandible, maxillule, maxilla and maxilliped (not shown) as in female. P 1 (Fig. 36 A): as in female except for dimorphic projection on inner distal corner of basis. P 2 (Fig. 36 B) as in female except for relatively stouter outer spines of the exopod, for relatively longer EXP 1, and for relatively shorter setae of ENP 2 in the male, of which apical seta barely reaching tip of EXP 3. P 3 (Fig. 37 A, B): as in female except for relatively stouter outer spines, and for longer EXP 1. Endopod clearly two-segmented; ENP 1 nearly as long as wide, with long inner spinules, unarmed; ENP 2 with inner distal apophysis bent outwards, very short, with two apical setae relatively shorter than in female (outer apical seta barely reaching tip of EXP 3, inner apical seta barely reaching middle of EXP 2); with paired asprothekes (Fig. 37 B). P 4 (Fig. 37 C) as in female, except for stouter outer spines of exopod, relatively longer EXP 1, and relatively shorter setae of ENP 2 (outer seta reaching slightly beyond EXP 1). Both P 5 fused (Fig. 34 E); exopod and baseoendopod fused; division between rami indicated by slight notch. Exopod with spinules as shown; with four elements. Baseoendopod with outer seta of basis; endopodal lobe with outer and inner spinules as shown; with three elements in all. P 6 (Fig. 34 D) represented by plate; without armature. Armature formula in Table 4. Leg P 1 P 2 P 3 P 4 P 5 Female EXP I- 0; I- 1; I, I 1,1 I- 0; I- 1; II, 2,1 I- 0; I- 1; II, 2,1 I- 0; I- 1; II, 2,0 4 ENP 0 - 1; 0, I 1,1 0 - 0; I, 2,0 0 - 0; I, 2,2 0,0; 0,2,0 6 Male EXP I- 0; I- 1; I, I 1,1 I- 0; I- 1; II, 2,1 I- 0; I- 1; II, 2,1 I- 0; I- 1; II, 2,0 4 ENP 0 - 1; 0, I 1,1 0 - 0; I, 2,0 0 - 0; 0,2, Apophysis 0,0; 0,2,0 3 Variability. The number of spinules / setae on the antennary exopod can vary from four to five in females and males. The number of seta on the second and last antennular segment of the female can vary from 8 to 9. The number of setae on the fourth antennular segment of the male can vary from 7 to 8.	en	Gómez, Samuel, Gerber, Ray, Fuentes-Reinés, Juan Manuel (2017): Redescription of Cletocamptus albuquerquensis and C. dominicanus (Harpacticoida: Canthocamptidae incertae sedis), and description of two new species from the US Virgin Islands and Bonaire. Zootaxa 4272 (3): 301-359, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4272.3.1
AF5D87B34A23FFE9AF8C1A93C3D6FAFD.taxon	etymology	Etymology. The species has been named after Pierre-Alfred Chappuis (1891 – 1960).	en	Gómez, Samuel, Gerber, Ray, Fuentes-Reinés, Juan Manuel (2017): Redescription of Cletocamptus albuquerquensis and C. dominicanus (Harpacticoida: Canthocamptidae incertae sedis), and description of two new species from the US Virgin Islands and Bonaire. Zootaxa 4272 (3): 301-359, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4272.3.1
AF5D87B34A23FFE9AF8C1A93C3D6FAFD.taxon	materials_examined	Type material. The male described by Chappuis (1933) is herein designated as the lectotype and only namebearing type of the species (Art. 74.4, International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature 1999). Type locality. Pos Shiki, Bonaire; muddy pond; temperature, 31 ° C; polyhaline.	en	Gómez, Samuel, Gerber, Ray, Fuentes-Reinés, Juan Manuel (2017): Redescription of Cletocamptus albuquerquensis and C. dominicanus (Harpacticoida: Canthocamptidae incertae sedis), and description of two new species from the US Virgin Islands and Bonaire. Zootaxa 4272 (3): 301-359, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4272.3.1
AF5D87B34A23FFE9AF8C1A93C3D6FAFD.taxon	distribution	Distribution. Bonaire: Pos Shiki (Chappuis 1933: 392).	en	Gómez, Samuel, Gerber, Ray, Fuentes-Reinés, Juan Manuel (2017): Redescription of Cletocamptus albuquerquensis and C. dominicanus (Harpacticoida: Canthocamptidae incertae sedis), and description of two new species from the US Virgin Islands and Bonaire. Zootaxa 4272 (3): 301-359, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4272.3.1
AF5D87B34A23FFE9AF8C1A93C3D6FAFD.taxon	description	Redescription (based on the original description in Chappuis 1933). Male. Total body length measured from tip of rostrum to posterior margin of caudal rami, 660 µm. General shape as in C. retrogressus. Posterior margin of somites smooth; posterior margin of abdominal somites with continuous row of setules dorsally, ventrally with parallel rows of slender setules (spinules?). Anal operculum rounded, bare. Caudal rami slightly divergent, slightly more than 3 times as long as wide; dorsal seta VII inserted medially on first half of ramus, articulated at its base; setae II and III inserted proximally on outer margin; setae IV, V and VI inserted distally; setae IV and V fused basally; seta VI short. Antennule short, strong, similar to that of C. retrogressus. Exopod of the antenna a single seta. P 1 as in the female of C. albuquerquensis; endopod two-segmented, first segment as long as EXP 1, with one inner seta; second segment with three setae. P 2 with three-segmented exopod; EXP 3 with one inner and two apical setae, and two outer spines: Endopod two-segmented; first segment small, squarish; second segment elongate, reaching tip of EXP 1, with one inner and one outer small seta, and one apical long element. P 3 with three-segmented exopod; EXP 1 about 3 times as long as wide, and about 0.8 times as long as EXP 2 and EXP 3 combined, without inner armature; EXP 2 with inner seta; EXP 3 with one inner seta, two apical elements, and two outer spines. Endopod dimorphic, two-segmented; first segment slightly longer than wide; second segment elongate, about 2.8 times as long as wide, reaching slightly beyond EXP 1; with short inner apophysis bent outwards at an angle of 90 °; with two apical setae. P 4 with three segmented exopod; first segment elongate, about 3 times as long as wide and about 0.75 times as long as EXP 2 and EXP 3 combined, without inner armature; EXP 2 with inner seta; EXP 3 without inner seta, with two apical setae and two outer spines. Endopod two-segmented; first segment very small, wider than long, without armature; second segment about four times as long as wide, barely reaching proximal seventh of EXP 1, with two setae. P 5 with fused rami separated only by small notch; both legs fused medially. Baseoendopod with outer seta of basis, endopodal lobe with three subequal setae. Exopod with four setae, of which outermost shortest, apical outer seta longest. P 6 a plate without armature. Female. Unknown.	en	Gómez, Samuel, Gerber, Ray, Fuentes-Reinés, Juan Manuel (2017): Redescription of Cletocamptus albuquerquensis and C. dominicanus (Harpacticoida: Canthocamptidae incertae sedis), and description of two new species from the US Virgin Islands and Bonaire. Zootaxa 4272 (3): 301-359, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4272.3.1
