taxonID	type	description	language	source
AC6A87E0FFB667315BB5CFEC8D6221F6.taxon	type_taxon	Type species: Pyrgus colotes Druce, 1875 (Fig. 2 a).	en	Zhang, Jing, Brockmann, Ernst, Cong, Qian, Shen, Jinhui, Grishin, Nick V. (2020): A genomic perspective on the taxonomy of the subtribe Carcharodina (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae: Carcharodini). Zootaxa 4748 (1): 182-194, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4748.1.10
AC6A87E0FFB667315BB5CFEC8D6221F6.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis. Morphologically similar to Spialia Swinhoe, 1912, where these species were placed previously. Keys to 5, 15, 21 (exclude antithesis of 25), or thesis 11 in de Jong (1978: 28 & 30), constituting his colotes, delagoae, and dromus species groups. Differs from its relatives by the following characters. Ventral hindwing with straight median white band not separated into sports, i. e., white spot in cell RS-M 1 (space 6) joins central spot (discal cell) to the outer (and not inner) spot in cell Sc + R 1 - RS (space 7), but in many species of Spialia this band either broken into spots or directed basad at costa. While Spialia species lack costal fold in males, some Ernsta species have costal fold (colotes species group). Species with costal fold are in addition characterized by the central white discal cell spot on dorsal forewing not closer to discocellular spot than to the basal cell spot and no two white spots are present above over the central cell spot (to distinguish from asterodia species group of de Jong (1978) that does not belong to Ernsta) and hindwing submarginal pale spots in cells M 1 - M 2 & M 2 - M 3 (spaces 4 & 5) offset basad from the rest of the submarginal spots. Species without costal fold either lack the basal white spots in discal cell on dorsal forewing, however, some white scales along cubital vein may be present forming a narrow streak (the delagoae species group), or on dorsal forewing in CuA 2 - 1 A + 2 A cell (space 1 B) the outer lower median spot absent and inner lower median spot not smaller than the outer upper median spot (dromus species group). In male genitalia, uncus not deeply incised, gnathos dorsally joined to tegumen, if gnathos free (in some species from the delagoae group), then coecum of aedeagus shortened or absent. In DNA COI barcode region, a combination of the following base pairs is diagnostic: A 46 T, C 278 T, T 280 A, T 282 T (not C), T 301 T (not C), T 349 A, G 353 G (not T), A 481 A (not T or C), and 529 (not T). Derivation of the name. The name is a feminine noun in the nominative singular. It honors Ernst Brockmann of Lich, Germany and his unstoppable passion for Hesperiidae in general and the Grizzled skippers in particular. Without his enthusiasm, help, encouragement and specimens this study would not be accomplished.	en	Zhang, Jing, Brockmann, Ernst, Cong, Qian, Shen, Jinhui, Grishin, Nick V. (2020): A genomic perspective on the taxonomy of the subtribe Carcharodina (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae: Carcharodini). Zootaxa 4748 (1): 182-194, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4748.1.10
AC6A87E0FFB667315BB5CFEC8D6221F6.taxon	discussion	Species included: Encompasses delagoae, colotes, and dromus species groups, as they were defined by de Jong (1978). Full species list is given below. These are mostly African species, only three of which (E. colotes, E. mangana, and E. bifida) cross the Red Sea into the southern corner of the Arabian Peninsula, and one (E. zebra) is recorded from the northwestern Himalayas. The phylogenetic trees (Fig. 1) suggest that this genus has split into two groups: one contains the type species of the genus, and the other one is named here as a subgenus.	en	Zhang, Jing, Brockmann, Ernst, Cong, Qian, Shen, Jinhui, Grishin, Nick V. (2020): A genomic perspective on the taxonomy of the subtribe Carcharodina (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae: Carcharodini). Zootaxa 4748 (1): 182-194, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4748.1.10
AC6A87E0FFB167315BB5CA948CE424C7.taxon	type_taxon	Type species: Pyrgus delagoae Trimen, 1898 (Fig. 2 b).	en	Zhang, Jing, Brockmann, Ernst, Cong, Qian, Shen, Jinhui, Grishin, Nick V. (2020): A genomic perspective on the taxonomy of the subtribe Carcharodina (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae: Carcharodini). Zootaxa 4748 (1): 182-194, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4748.1.10
AC6A87E0FFB167315BB5CA948CE424C7.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis. Keys to 15 in de Jong (1978: 30), constituting his delagoae species group. Morphologically differs from other species in the genus by the following characters. Forewing dorsal white spots at the base of CuA 2 - 1 A + 2 A cell (space 1 B) absent, and the spot at the base of the discal cell is absent in most species (some white scales along cubital vein may be present forming a narrow streak). Ventral hindwing with a straight median white band, i. e., a white spot in cell RS-M 1 (space 6) joins the central spot (discal cell) to the outer (and not inner) spot in cell Sc + R 1 - RS (space 7). In male genitalia, coecum of aedeagus shortened or absent; valva with the costal process and harpe (= cucullus) lacks a fold covering the costal process, or the fold is small. In DNA COI barcode region, a combination of the following base pairs is diagnostic: T 19 A, T 22 A, T 70 A, T 374 G, and T 646 C. Derivation of the name. The name is a feminine noun in the nominative singular derived from the name of the type species. Species included: Encompasses delagoae species groups, as it was defined by de Jong (1978). Full species list is given below. In addition to Ernsta, the phylogenetic trees (Fig. 1) suggest a second new genus, which while being monophyletic with Ernsta is prominently different from it.	en	Zhang, Jing, Brockmann, Ernst, Cong, Qian, Shen, Jinhui, Grishin, Nick V. (2020): A genomic perspective on the taxonomy of the subtribe Carcharodina (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae: Carcharodini). Zootaxa 4748 (1): 182-194, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4748.1.10
AC6A87E0FFB167305BB5CF8A8B5C2522.taxon	type_taxon	Type species: Pyrgus agylla Trimen, 1889 (Fig. 2 c).	en	Zhang, Jing, Brockmann, Ernst, Cong, Qian, Shen, Jinhui, Grishin, Nick V. (2020): A genomic perspective on the taxonomy of the subtribe Carcharodina (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae: Carcharodini). Zootaxa 4748 (1): 182-194, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4748.1.10
AC6A87E0FFB167305BB5CF8A8B5C2522.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis. Keys to 2 in de Jong (1978: 28), constituting his asterodia species group. Morphologically differs from close relatives by the following characters. Out of three spots in forewing discal cell, rectangular middle spot (the largest) closer to streak-like spot at distal end of cell than to well-developed and rounded basal spot; no dorsal white spots at base of CuA 2 - 1 A + 2 A cell (space 1 B). Ventral hindwing with a straight median white band, i. e., a white spot in cell Rs-M 1 (space 6) joins the central spot (discal cell) to the outer (and not inner) spot in cell Sc + R 1 - Rs (space 7). In male genitalia, uncus deeply incised; valva with large costal process and harpe (= cucullus) lacks a fold covering the costal process. In DNA COI barcode region, a combination of the following base pairs is diagnostic: A 307 T, A 352 T, T 364 C, C 401 T, T 403 A, T 500 C, and A 502 T. Derivation of the name. The name is a feminine noun in the nominative singular derived from the name of the type species.	en	Zhang, Jing, Brockmann, Ernst, Cong, Qian, Shen, Jinhui, Grishin, Nick V. (2020): A genomic perspective on the taxonomy of the subtribe Carcharodina (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae: Carcharodini). Zootaxa 4748 (1): 182-194, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4748.1.10
AC6A87E0FFB167305BB5CF8A8B5C2522.taxon	discussion	Species included: Encompasses asterodia species groups as it was defined by de Jong (1978). Full species list is given below. Second, we observe that Carcharodus is not monophyletic. Only one species, Carcharodus tripolina (Verity, 1925) groups with the type species of the genus Carcharodus alceae (Esper, 1780). These results are consistent with the recent treatment by Coutsis (2016), who placed all other Carcharodus species in Reverdinus Ragusa, 1919. In our trees, Reverdinus is in the same cluster with Muschampia Tutt, 1906 and the branch length separating Reverdinus from other Muschampia is not significantly larger than the branch lengths separating Muschampia species from each other. Thus, we consider Reverdinus Ragusa, 1919 to be a subgenus of Muschampia. Additionally, we see that genus names previously given to various groups currently placed in Muschampia indeed denote monophyletic groups within the genus and we suggest to treat these groups as subgenera: Warrenohesperia Strand, 1928, Sloperia Tutt, 1906 and Tuttia Warren, 1926 (Fig. 1). Third, we find that “ Muschampia ” cribrellum (Eversmann, 1841), the type species of the genus Favria Tutt, 1906 is not monophyletic with Muschampia. Instead, it is a confident sister of Gomalia in nuclear genome trees (Fig. 1 ab). Its phylogenetic position is not very strongly supported in the mitogenome tree (88 % bootstrap, Fig. 1 c), but it is well-separated from Muschampia. This species has been a puzzle and is uniquely characterized by spined mid-tibiae. Therefore we reinstate Favria as a valid genus, currently monotypic. Fourth, we see that the holotype of Tavetana jeanneli Picard, 1949 (Fig. 3) is not a dark form of Gomalia elma (Trimen, 1862) as currently considered, but a Gomalia species well removed from it. COI barcodes of the two species differ by nearly 7 % (45 base pairs). Moreover, the differences in genitalia of the Indian Gomalia elma albofasciata Moore, 1879 (see plate 23, D 2 in Evans, 1949) and the African nominal subspecies (plate 13 in Evans, 1937) argue for the species status of the Indian taxon. Most notably, ampulla of male genitalic valva is expanded in C. albofasciata compared to C. elma, in which costa smoothly transitions to a tooth-like ending of harpe. Furthermore, we elevate to species Spialia lugens (Staudinger, 1886) and Spialia carnea (Reverdin, 1927) formerly considered subspecies of Spialia orbifer (Hübner, [1823]). Sequencing of S. lugens and S. carnea type specimens in the Berlin Museum für Naturkunde reveals 2.2 % - 3.2 % difference in COI barcode from nominotypical populations of S. orbifer. Distinct barcodes combined with the differences in facies suggest species-level status for these taxa. Spialia lugens differs from the two other species by the larger size, darker wing above with faint or absent submarginal sports, rarely, and mostly in females, better developed (de Jong, 1978). S. carnea is characterized by warm reddish to brown-yellow color of hindwing below and reduced submarginal spots on hindwing below in cells M 1 - M 2 and M 2 - M 3. Finally, difference in male genitalia, notably the shape of uncus (de Jong, 1978; Evans, 1937), suggest that Ernsta bifida (Higgins, 1924), a species distinct from Ernsta zebra (Butler, 1888) and not its subspecies. Taken together, the data we obtained suggest the following taxonomic arrangement of the subtribe Carcharodina. Taxonomic arrangement of the subtribe Carcharodina. Based on our analysis, the list of species arranged into genera and subgenera is given below. Synonymic names are included for genera and subgenera. Names treated as synonyms (genera and names of type species that are considered to be synonyms) are preceded by “ = ”: not followed by daggers are subjective junior synonyms; † objective junior synonyms; ‡ unavailable names (such as homonyms and nomina nuda); “ preocc. ” indicates preoccupied, the taxonomic order (all insects) of the senior name is shown in brackets. Synonyms are attributed to subgenera. Type species (TS) for genera and subgenera are listed and underlined. For type species that are considered to be synonyms, valid names are shown in parenthesis. For valid genera and subgenera (not their synonyms), names of the type species or names which type species are considered to be synonyms of, are underlined in the list. Subspecies names are not listed pending further studies.	en	Zhang, Jing, Brockmann, Ernst, Cong, Qian, Shen, Jinhui, Grishin, Nick V. (2020): A genomic perspective on the taxonomy of the subtribe Carcharodina (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae: Carcharodini). Zootaxa 4748 (1): 182-194, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4748.1.10
AC6A87E0FFB367335BB5CFCB8CEC2490.taxon	type_taxon	; TS:	en	Zhang, Jing, Brockmann, Ernst, Cong, Qian, Shen, Jinhui, Grishin, Nick V. (2020): A genomic perspective on the taxonomy of the subtribe Carcharodina (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae: Carcharodini). Zootaxa 4748 (1): 182-194, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4748.1.10
AC6A87E0FFB367325BB5CF828A4D2336.taxon	synonymic_list	Spialia mafa (Trimen, 1870) Spialia galba (Fabricius, 1793) Spialia spio (Linnaeus, 1764) Spialia ali Oberthür, 1881 Spialia therapne (Rambur, 1832) Spialia sertorius (Hoffmannsegg, 1804) Spialia rosae Hernández-Roldán, Dapporto, Dincă, Vicente & Vila, 2016 Spialia orbifer (Hübner, [1823]) Spialia lugens (Staudinger, 1886); new status, was a subspecies of S. orbifer Spialia carnea (Reverdin, 1927); new status, was a subspecies of S. orbifer	en	Zhang, Jing, Brockmann, Ernst, Cong, Qian, Shen, Jinhui, Grishin, Nick V. (2020): A genomic perspective on the taxonomy of the subtribe Carcharodina (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae: Carcharodini). Zootaxa 4748 (1): 182-194, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4748.1.10
AC6A87E0FFB267325BB5CCA08DE52556.taxon	type_taxon	TS: colotes Druce	en	Zhang, Jing, Brockmann, Ernst, Cong, Qian, Shen, Jinhui, Grishin, Nick V. (2020): A genomic perspective on the taxonomy of the subtribe Carcharodina (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae: Carcharodini). Zootaxa 4748 (1): 182-194, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4748.1.10
AC6A87E0FFB267325BB5CCA08DE52556.taxon	synonymic_list	Ernsta colotes (Druce, 1875); new combination, was in Spialia Ernsta confusa (Higgins, 1924); new combination, was in Spialia Ernsta wrefordi (Evans, 1951); new combination, was in Spialia Ernsta paula (Higgins, 1924); new combination, was in Spialia Ernsta secessus (Trimen, 1891); new combination, was in Spialia Ernsta dromus (Plötz, 1884); new combination, was in Spialia Ernsta ploetzi (Aurivillius, 1891); new combination, was in Spialia	en	Zhang, Jing, Brockmann, Ernst, Cong, Qian, Shen, Jinhui, Grishin, Nick V. (2020): A genomic perspective on the taxonomy of the subtribe Carcharodina (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae: Carcharodini). Zootaxa 4748 (1): 182-194, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4748.1.10
AC6A87E0FFB267325BB5C8F88C652149.taxon	discussion	was a synonym of Spialia;	en	Zhang, Jing, Brockmann, Ernst, Cong, Qian, Shen, Jinhui, Grishin, Nick V. (2020): A genomic perspective on the taxonomy of the subtribe Carcharodina (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae: Carcharodini). Zootaxa 4748 (1): 182-194, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4748.1.10
AC6A87E0FFB267325BB5C8F88C652149.taxon	type_taxon	TS: phlomidis Herrich-Schäffer	en	Zhang, Jing, Brockmann, Ernst, Cong, Qian, Shen, Jinhui, Grishin, Nick V. (2020): A genomic perspective on the taxonomy of the subtribe Carcharodina (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae: Carcharodini). Zootaxa 4748 (1): 182-194, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4748.1.10
AC6A87E0FFB267325BB5C8F88C652149.taxon	synonymic_list	Spialia phlomidis (Herrich-Schäffer, [1845]) Spialia struvei (Püngeler, 1914) Spialia fetida Zhdanko, 1992 Spialia irida Zhdanko, 1993 Spialia osthelderi (Pfeiffer, 1932) Spialia geron (Watson, 1893) Spialia doris (Walker, 1870) Spialia diomus (Hopffer, 1855) Spialia ferax (Wallengren, 1863)	en	Zhang, Jing, Brockmann, Ernst, Cong, Qian, Shen, Jinhui, Grishin, Nick V. (2020): A genomic perspective on the taxonomy of the subtribe Carcharodina (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae: Carcharodini). Zootaxa 4748 (1): 182-194, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4748.1.10
AC6A87E0FFB2673D5BB5CE588A5222E2.taxon	type_taxon	TS: albofasciata Moore = Tavetana Picard, 1949; TS: jeanneli Picard	en	Zhang, Jing, Brockmann, Ernst, Cong, Qian, Shen, Jinhui, Grishin, Nick V. (2020): A genomic perspective on the taxonomy of the subtribe Carcharodina (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae: Carcharodini). Zootaxa 4748 (1): 182-194, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4748.1.10
AC6A87E0FFB2673D5BB5CE588A5222E2.taxon	synonymic_list	Gomalia elma (Trimen, 1862) Gomalia jeanneli (Picard, 1949); stat. rev., was a synonym of G. elma Gomalia albofasciata Moore, 1879; stat. rev., was a subspecies of G. elma	en	Zhang, Jing, Brockmann, Ernst, Cong, Qian, Shen, Jinhui, Grishin, Nick V. (2020): A genomic perspective on the taxonomy of the subtribe Carcharodina (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae: Carcharodini). Zootaxa 4748 (1): 182-194, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4748.1.10
AC6A87E0FFBD673D5BB5C98C8C2A2312.taxon	discussion	, was a synonym of Muschampia;	en	Zhang, Jing, Brockmann, Ernst, Cong, Qian, Shen, Jinhui, Grishin, Nick V. (2020): A genomic perspective on the taxonomy of the subtribe Carcharodina (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae: Carcharodini). Zootaxa 4748 (1): 182-194, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4748.1.10
AC6A87E0FFBD673D5BB5C98C8C2A2312.taxon	type_taxon	TS: cribrellum Eversmann	en	Zhang, Jing, Brockmann, Ernst, Cong, Qian, Shen, Jinhui, Grishin, Nick V. (2020): A genomic perspective on the taxonomy of the subtribe Carcharodina (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae: Carcharodini). Zootaxa 4748 (1): 182-194, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4748.1.10
AC6A87E0FFBD673D5BB5C98C8C2A2312.taxon	synonymic_list	Favria cribrellum (Eversmann, 1841)	en	Zhang, Jing, Brockmann, Ernst, Cong, Qian, Shen, Jinhui, Grishin, Nick V. (2020): A genomic perspective on the taxonomy of the subtribe Carcharodina (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae: Carcharodini). Zootaxa 4748 (1): 182-194, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4748.1.10
AC6A87E0FFBD673D5BB5C8D48C2721F6.taxon	type_taxon	TS: proto Ochsenheimer	en	Zhang, Jing, Brockmann, Ernst, Cong, Qian, Shen, Jinhui, Grishin, Nick V. (2020): A genomic perspective on the taxonomy of the subtribe Carcharodina (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae: Carcharodini). Zootaxa 4748 (1): 182-194, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4748.1.10
AC6A87E0FFBD673D5BB5C8D48C2721F6.taxon	synonymic_list	Muschampia tessellum (Hübner, [1800 - 1803]) Muschampia nomas (Lederer, 1855) Muschampia tersa Evans, 1949 Muschampia nobilis (Staudinger, 1882) Muschampia kuenlunus (Grum-Grshimailo, 1893) Muschampia protheon (Rambur, 1858) Muschampia gigas (Bremer, 1864) Muschampia proto Ochsenheimer, 1808 Muschampia proteides (F. Wagner, 1929) Muschampia mohammed (Oberthür, 1887) Muschampia leuzeae (Oberthür, 1881)	en	Zhang, Jing, Brockmann, Ernst, Cong, Qian, Shen, Jinhui, Grishin, Nick V. (2020): A genomic perspective on the taxonomy of the subtribe Carcharodina (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae: Carcharodini). Zootaxa 4748 (1): 182-194, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4748.1.10
AC6A87E0FFBD673D5BB5C81C8D5B23DA.taxon	type_taxon	TS: proto Ochsenheimer	en	Zhang, Jing, Brockmann, Ernst, Cong, Qian, Shen, Jinhui, Grishin, Nick V. (2020): A genomic perspective on the taxonomy of the subtribe Carcharodina (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae: Carcharodini). Zootaxa 4748 (1): 182-194, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4748.1.10
AC6A87E0FFBD673D5BB5CF788A652522.taxon	discussion	was a synonym of Carcharodus;	en	Zhang, Jing, Brockmann, Ernst, Cong, Qian, Shen, Jinhui, Grishin, Nick V. (2020): A genomic perspective on the taxonomy of the subtribe Carcharodina (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae: Carcharodini). Zootaxa 4748 (1): 182-194, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4748.1.10
AC6A87E0FFBD673D5BB5CF788A652522.taxon	type_taxon	TS: = ‡ altheae	en	Zhang, Jing, Brockmann, Ernst, Cong, Qian, Shen, Jinhui, Grishin, Nick V. (2020): A genomic perspective on the taxonomy of the subtribe Carcharodina (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae: Carcharodini). Zootaxa 4748 (1): 182-194, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4748.1.10
AC6A87E0FFBD673D5BB5CF788A652522.taxon	synonymic_list	Muschampia floccifera (Zeller, 1847); new combination, was in Carcharodus Muschampia orientalis (Reverdin, 1913); new combination, was in Carcharodus Muschampia dravira (Moore, [1875]); new combination, was in Carcharodus Muschampia stauderi (Reverdin, 1913); new combination, was in Carcharodus Muschampia baeticus (Rambur, 1840); new combination, was in Carcharodus Muschampia lavatherae (Esper, 1783); new combination, was in Carcharodus	en	Zhang, Jing, Brockmann, Ernst, Cong, Qian, Shen, Jinhui, Grishin, Nick V. (2020): A genomic perspective on the taxonomy of the subtribe Carcharodina (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae: Carcharodini). Zootaxa 4748 (1): 182-194, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4748.1.10
AC6A87E0FFBD673D5BB5CAB88C3E2762.taxon	discussion	was a synonym of Muschampia;	en	Zhang, Jing, Brockmann, Ernst, Cong, Qian, Shen, Jinhui, Grishin, Nick V. (2020): A genomic perspective on the taxonomy of the subtribe Carcharodina (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae: Carcharodini). Zootaxa 4748 (1): 182-194, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4748.1.10
AC6A87E0FFBD673D5BB5CAB88C3E2762.taxon	type_taxon	TS: poggei Lederer	en	Zhang, Jing, Brockmann, Ernst, Cong, Qian, Shen, Jinhui, Grishin, Nick V. (2020): A genomic perspective on the taxonomy of the subtribe Carcharodina (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae: Carcharodini). Zootaxa 4748 (1): 182-194, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4748.1.10
AC6A87E0FFBD673D5BB5CAB88C3E2762.taxon	synonymic_list	Muschampia proteus (Staudinger, 1886) Muschampia prometheus (Grum-Grshimailo, 1890) Muschampia plurimacula (Christoph, 1893) Muschampia staudingeri (Speyer, 1879) Muschampia musta Evans, 1949 Muschampia lutulentus (Grum-Grshimailo, 1887) Muschampia poggei (Lederer, 1858)	en	Zhang, Jing, Brockmann, Ernst, Cong, Qian, Shen, Jinhui, Grishin, Nick V. (2020): A genomic perspective on the taxonomy of the subtribe Carcharodina (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae: Carcharodini). Zootaxa 4748 (1): 182-194, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4748.1.10
AC6A87E0FFBD673D5BB5CC0C8C3327B6.taxon	discussion	was a synonym of Muschampia;	en	Zhang, Jing, Brockmann, Ernst, Cong, Qian, Shen, Jinhui, Grishin, Nick V. (2020): A genomic perspective on the taxonomy of the subtribe Carcharodina (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae: Carcharodini). Zootaxa 4748 (1): 182-194, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4748.1.10
AC6A87E0FFBD673D5BB5CC0C8C3327B6.taxon	type_taxon	TS: antonia Speyer	en	Zhang, Jing, Brockmann, Ernst, Cong, Qian, Shen, Jinhui, Grishin, Nick V. (2020): A genomic perspective on the taxonomy of the subtribe Carcharodina (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae: Carcharodini). Zootaxa 4748 (1): 182-194, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4748.1.10
AC6A87E0FFBD673D5BB5CC0C8C3327B6.taxon	synonymic_list	Muschampia antonia (Speyer, 1879)	en	Zhang, Jing, Brockmann, Ernst, Cong, Qian, Shen, Jinhui, Grishin, Nick V. (2020): A genomic perspective on the taxonomy of the subtribe Carcharodina (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae: Carcharodini). Zootaxa 4748 (1): 182-194, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4748.1.10
AC6A87E0FFBD673C5BB5CECC8C32234E.taxon	type_taxon	TS: alceae Esper	en	Zhang, Jing, Brockmann, Ernst, Cong, Qian, Shen, Jinhui, Grishin, Nick V. (2020): A genomic perspective on the taxonomy of the subtribe Carcharodina (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae: Carcharodini). Zootaxa 4748 (1): 182-194, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4748.1.10
AC6A87E0FFBD673C5BB5CECC8C32234E.taxon	synonymic_list	Carcharodus alceae (Esper, 1780) Carcharodus tripolina (Verity, 1925)	en	Zhang, Jing, Brockmann, Ernst, Cong, Qian, Shen, Jinhui, Grishin, Nick V. (2020): A genomic perspective on the taxonomy of the subtribe Carcharodina (Lepidoptera: Hesperiidae: Carcharodini). Zootaxa 4748 (1): 182-194, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4748.1.10
