taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
B360D319FFEEFFC129E57EE4D86004B0.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/8432623/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8432623	Figure 2. Celtodoryx chichiltik sp. nov. A, B, External morphology of alive and preserved specimens (respectively); C, drawing of a crosssection of the skeletal structure; D, drawings of spicule iso- or anisotylotes; E, drawings of spicule iso- or anisostrongyles.	Figure 2. Celtodoryx chichiltik sp. nov. A, B, External morphology of alive and preserved specimens (respectively); C, drawing of a crosssection of the skeletal structure; D, drawings of spicule iso- or anisotylotes; E, drawings of spicule iso- or anisostrongyles.	2023-07-22	Cruz-Barraza, José Antonio;Carballo, José Luis;Aguilar-Camacho, José María		Zenodo	biologists	Cruz-Barraza, José Antonio;Carballo, José Luis;Aguilar-Camacho, José María			
B360D319FFEEFFC129E57EE4D86004B0.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/8432625/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8432625	Figure 3. SEM images of spicules of Celtodoryx chichiltik sp. nov. A, Strongyle; B, tylote; C, detail of head and tip of the of strongyles; D, arcuate tridentate isochelae; E, F, detailed morphology of the oxychaetes.	Figure 3. SEM images of spicules of Celtodoryx chichiltik sp. nov. A, Strongyle; B, tylote; C, detail of head and tip of the of strongyles; D, arcuate tridentate isochelae; E, F, detailed morphology of the oxychaetes.	2023-07-22	Cruz-Barraza, José Antonio;Carballo, José Luis;Aguilar-Camacho, José María		Zenodo	biologists	Cruz-Barraza, José Antonio;Carballo, José Luis;Aguilar-Camacho, José María			
B360D319FFEEFFC129E57EE4D86004B0.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/8432621/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8432621	Figure 1. Location of the sampling stations along the coast of Mexico.The numbers show the distribution of the species:(1) Celtodoryx chichiltik sp. nov.; (2) Lissodendoryx (Anomodoryx) incrustans sp. nov.; (3) Lissodendoryx (Lissodendoryx) albemarlensis; (4) L. (W.) hawaiiana.	Figure 1. Location of the sampling stations along the coast of Mexico.The numbers show the distribution of the species:(1) Celtodoryx chichiltik sp. nov.; (2) Lissodendoryx (Anomodoryx) incrustans sp. nov.; (3) Lissodendoryx (Lissodendoryx) albemarlensis; (4) L. (W.) hawaiiana.	2023-07-22	Cruz-Barraza, José Antonio;Carballo, José Luis;Aguilar-Camacho, José María		Zenodo	biologists	Cruz-Barraza, José Antonio;Carballo, José Luis;Aguilar-Camacho, José María			
B360D319FFEAFFCF2A037A60DB5C05F8.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/8432627/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8432627	Figure 4. Lissodendoryx (Anomodoryx) incrustans sp. nov. A, B, External morphology of preserved holotype; C, drawings of a cross-section of the skeletal structure.	Figure 4. Lissodendoryx (Anomodoryx) incrustans sp. nov. A, B, External morphology of preserved holotype; C, drawings of a cross-section of the skeletal structure.	2023-07-22	Cruz-Barraza, José Antonio;Carballo, José Luis;Aguilar-Camacho, José María		Zenodo	biologists	Cruz-Barraza, José Antonio;Carballo, José Luis;Aguilar-Camacho, José María			
B360D319FFEAFFCF2A037A60DB5C05F8.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/8432629/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8432629	Figure 5. SEM images of spicules of Lissodendoryx (Anomodoryx) incrustans sp. nov. A, Tylotes; B, tylotes head detail; C, sigmas; D, arcuate isochelae. Table 3. Comparative data for the dimensions of the spicules (in µm) of Lissodendoryx (Anomodoryx) incrustans sp.nov., shass length × width are given for megascleres and total length for arcuate isochelae and sigmas. Values in parentheses are means	Figure 5. SEM images of spicules of Lissodendoryx (Anomodoryx) incrustans sp. nov. A, Tylotes; B, tylotes head detail; C, sigmas; D, arcuate isochelae. Table 3. Comparative data for the dimensions of the spicules (in µm) of Lissodendoryx (Anomodoryx) incrustans sp.nov., shass length × width are given for megascleres and total length for arcuate isochelae and sigmas. Values in parentheses are means	2023-07-22	Cruz-Barraza, José Antonio;Carballo, José Luis;Aguilar-Camacho, José María		Zenodo	biologists	Cruz-Barraza, José Antonio;Carballo, José Luis;Aguilar-Camacho, José María			
B360D319FFEAFFCF2A037A60DB5C05F8.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/8432621/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8432621	Figure 1. Location of the sampling stations along the coast of Mexico.The numbers show the distribution of the species:(1) Celtodoryx chichiltik sp. nov.; (2) Lissodendoryx (Anomodoryx) incrustans sp. nov.; (3) Lissodendoryx (Lissodendoryx) albemarlensis; (4) L. (W.) hawaiiana.	Figure 1. Location of the sampling stations along the coast of Mexico.The numbers show the distribution of the species:(1) Celtodoryx chichiltik sp. nov.; (2) Lissodendoryx (Anomodoryx) incrustans sp. nov.; (3) Lissodendoryx (Lissodendoryx) albemarlensis; (4) L. (W.) hawaiiana.	2023-07-22	Cruz-Barraza, José Antonio;Carballo, José Luis;Aguilar-Camacho, José María		Zenodo	biologists	Cruz-Barraza, José Antonio;Carballo, José Luis;Aguilar-Camacho, José María			
B360D319FFE4FFCC29C87CB8DAB0019A.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/8432631/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8432631	Figure 6. Lissodendoryx (Lissodendoryx) albemarlensis. A, B, External morphology of two alive specimens out of the water; drawings of (C) tangential view of ectosomal skeletal structure; D, cross-section view of choanosomal skeletal structure.	Figure 6. Lissodendoryx (Lissodendoryx) albemarlensis. A, B, External morphology of two alive specimens out of the water; drawings of (C) tangential view of ectosomal skeletal structure; D, cross-section view of choanosomal skeletal structure.	2023-07-22	Cruz-Barraza, José Antonio;Carballo, José Luis;Aguilar-Camacho, José María		Zenodo	biologists	Cruz-Barraza, José Antonio;Carballo, José Luis;Aguilar-Camacho, José María			
B360D319FFE4FFCC29C87CB8DAB0019A.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/8432633/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8432633	Figure 7. SEM images of spicules of Lissodendoryx (Lissodendoryx) albemarlensis. A-D, Specimen LEB-ICML-UNAM-27; E, H, specimen AHF-1736-49; A, E, tylotes and detail of their heads; B, F, styles and detail of their ends; C, G, sigmas; D, H, arcuate isochelae.	Figure 7. SEM images of spicules of Lissodendoryx (Lissodendoryx) albemarlensis. A-D, Specimen LEB-ICML-UNAM-27; E, H, specimen AHF-1736-49; A, E, tylotes and detail of their heads; B, F, styles and detail of their ends; C, G, sigmas; D, H, arcuate isochelae.	2023-07-22	Cruz-Barraza, José Antonio;Carballo, José Luis;Aguilar-Camacho, José María		Zenodo	biologists	Cruz-Barraza, José Antonio;Carballo, José Luis;Aguilar-Camacho, José María			
B360D319FFE4FFCC29C87CB8DAB0019A.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/8432621/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8432621	Figure 1. Location of the sampling stations along the coast of Mexico.The numbers show the distribution of the species:(1) Celtodoryx chichiltik sp. nov.; (2) Lissodendoryx (Anomodoryx) incrustans sp. nov.; (3) Lissodendoryx (Lissodendoryx) albemarlensis; (4) L. (W.) hawaiiana.	Figure 1. Location of the sampling stations along the coast of Mexico.The numbers show the distribution of the species:(1) Celtodoryx chichiltik sp. nov.; (2) Lissodendoryx (Anomodoryx) incrustans sp. nov.; (3) Lissodendoryx (Lissodendoryx) albemarlensis; (4) L. (W.) hawaiiana.	2023-07-22	Cruz-Barraza, José Antonio;Carballo, José Luis;Aguilar-Camacho, José María		Zenodo	biologists	Cruz-Barraza, José Antonio;Carballo, José Luis;Aguilar-Camacho, José María			
B360D319FFE6FFD4299C7E57D84F04AF.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/8432635/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8432635	Figure 8. Lissodendoryx (Waldoschmittia) hawaiiana. A, B, External morphology of alive and preserved specimens, respectively; C, tangential view of ectosomal skeletal structure; D, cross-section view of choanosomal skeletal structure.	Figure 8. Lissodendoryx (Waldoschmittia) hawaiiana. A, B, External morphology of alive and preserved specimens, respectively; C, tangential view of ectosomal skeletal structure; D, cross-section view of choanosomal skeletal structure.	2023-07-22	Cruz-Barraza, José Antonio;Carballo, José Luis;Aguilar-Camacho, José María		Zenodo	biologists	Cruz-Barraza, José Antonio;Carballo, José Luis;Aguilar-Camacho, José María			
B360D319FFE6FFD4299C7E57D84F04AF.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/8432637/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8432637	Figure 9. SEM images of spicules of Lissodendoryx (Waldoschmittia) hawaiiana. A, Tylote and detail of its head; B, variety of oxeas morphology and detail of its ends: C, sigmas I; D, arcuate isochelae.	Figure 9. SEM images of spicules of Lissodendoryx (Waldoschmittia) hawaiiana. A, Tylote and detail of its head; B, variety of oxeas morphology and detail of its ends: C, sigmas I; D, arcuate isochelae.	2023-07-22	Cruz-Barraza, José Antonio;Carballo, José Luis;Aguilar-Camacho, José María		Zenodo	biologists	Cruz-Barraza, José Antonio;Carballo, José Luis;Aguilar-Camacho, José María			
B360D319FFE6FFD4299C7E57D84F04AF.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/8432621/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8432621	Figure 1. Location of the sampling stations along the coast of Mexico.The numbers show the distribution of the species:(1) Celtodoryx chichiltik sp. nov.; (2) Lissodendoryx (Anomodoryx) incrustans sp. nov.; (3) Lissodendoryx (Lissodendoryx) albemarlensis; (4) L. (W.) hawaiiana.	Figure 1. Location of the sampling stations along the coast of Mexico.The numbers show the distribution of the species:(1) Celtodoryx chichiltik sp. nov.; (2) Lissodendoryx (Anomodoryx) incrustans sp. nov.; (3) Lissodendoryx (Lissodendoryx) albemarlensis; (4) L. (W.) hawaiiana.	2023-07-22	Cruz-Barraza, José Antonio;Carballo, José Luis;Aguilar-Camacho, José María		Zenodo	biologists	Cruz-Barraza, José Antonio;Carballo, José Luis;Aguilar-Camacho, José María			
B360D319FFE6FFD4299C7E57D84F04AF.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/8432639/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8432639	Figure 10. Phylogenetic reconstruction of 28S rRNA nuclear-ribosomal region (C1, C2–D2). The tree presented was obtained by BI and includes ML values. The number at each node represents the PP in % from BI, followed by the BP from ML; a (–) indicates that a particular analysis supported the node at less than 50%.The GenBank accession numbers are given asser each taxon name.	Figure 10. Phylogenetic reconstruction of 28S rRNA nuclear-ribosomal region (C1, C2–D2). The tree presented was obtained by BI and includes ML values. The number at each node represents the PP in % from BI, followed by the BP from ML; a (–) indicates that a particular analysis supported the node at less than 50%.The GenBank accession numbers are given asser each taxon name.	2023-07-22	Cruz-Barraza, José Antonio;Carballo, José Luis;Aguilar-Camacho, José María		Zenodo	biologists	Cruz-Barraza, José Antonio;Carballo, José Luis;Aguilar-Camacho, José María			
B360D319FFE6FFD4299C7E57D84F04AF.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/8432641/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8432641	Figure 11. Phylogenetic reconstruction of the COI mtDNA fragment. The tree presented was obtained by BI and includes ML values. The number at each node represents the PP in % from BI, followed by the BP from ML; a (–) indicates that a particular analysis supported the node at less than 50%.The GenBank accession numbers are given asser each taxon name.	Figure 11. Phylogenetic reconstruction of the COI mtDNA fragment. The tree presented was obtained by BI and includes ML values. The number at each node represents the PP in % from BI, followed by the BP from ML; a (–) indicates that a particular analysis supported the node at less than 50%.The GenBank accession numbers are given asser each taxon name.	2023-07-22	Cruz-Barraza, José Antonio;Carballo, José Luis;Aguilar-Camacho, José María		Zenodo	biologists	Cruz-Barraza, José Antonio;Carballo, José Luis;Aguilar-Camacho, José María			
