taxonID	type	description	language	source
B22687E02500A34EFF28FE4EFD311AEE.taxon	type_taxon	Type species by subsequent designation (Distant 1904: 361): Myocoris gilvus Burmeister, 1838.	en	Chen, Ling, Wang, Yang, Rédei, Dávid (2021): Taxonomic corrections for East and Southeast Asian Reduviidae (Hemiptera Heteroptera). Zootaxa 4948 (4): 586-598, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4948.4.7
B22687E02500A34EFF28FE4EFD311AEE.taxon	discussion	Remarks. The nomenclature of Cutocoris was thoroughly discussed by Swanson (2019). A minor correction is needed to his treatment: issue 9 of vol. 23 (1866) of Öfversigt af Kongliga Svenska Vetenskaps-Akademiens Förhandlingar was published in early 1867 (cf. bottom of the last printed page [p. 358] of the issue), therefore the generic name Cydnocoris should be cited with this latter date.	en	Chen, Ling, Wang, Yang, Rédei, Dávid (2021): Taxonomic corrections for East and Southeast Asian Reduviidae (Hemiptera Heteroptera). Zootaxa 4948 (4): 586-598, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4948.4.7
B22687E02500A34EFF28FB71FE0E182D.taxon	description	(Figs. 1 – 6)	en	Chen, Ling, Wang, Yang, Rédei, Dávid (2021): Taxonomic corrections for East and Southeast Asian Reduviidae (Hemiptera Heteroptera). Zootaxa 4948 (4): 586-598, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4948.4.7
B22687E02502A34BFF28F893FCF41910.taxon	description	(Figs. 7 – 14)	en	Chen, Ling, Wang, Yang, Rédei, Dávid (2021): Taxonomic corrections for East and Southeast Asian Reduviidae (Hemiptera Heteroptera). Zootaxa 4948 (4): 586-598, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4948.4.7
B22687E02502A34BFF28F893FCF41910.taxon	materials_examined	Type material examined. Henricohahnia wangi Ren, 2001. Holotype: ♀, “ <Yunnan Xishuangbanna Mengzhe> [ch] \ 1200 <m> [ch] \ <Chinese Academy of Sciences> [ch] ” [with horizontal line between lines # 2 and # 3], “ 1958. VII. 8 [hw] \ <collector: Wang Shu Yong> [ch] ”, “ Henricohahnia [hw] \ wangi Ren, sp. [hw] \ nov. [hw] \ HOLO- TYPE [pr] 2000. V. [hw] ” [red, with pr black frame]; pinned, right distiflagellum missing (NKUM) (Figs. 7 – 14).	en	Chen, Ling, Wang, Yang, Rédei, Dávid (2021): Taxonomic corrections for East and Southeast Asian Reduviidae (Hemiptera Heteroptera). Zootaxa 4948 (4): 586-598, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4948.4.7
B22687E02502A34BFF28F893FCF41910.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis. Differs from other species of Henricohahnia Breddin, 1900, in the presence of conspicuously large and robust, almost cylindrical tubercles on the anterior lobe of the pronotum (with a particularly large pair posteriorly), on the head ventrolaterally (Figs. 10 – 11), and on the scape subapically (Fig. 12); these tubercles are distinctly smaller in other congeners. In respect of the above characters it is fairly similar to H. montana (Distant, 1903), known from northeastern India (type material examined); due to the lack of males it is tentatively maintained as a distinct species.	en	Chen, Ling, Wang, Yang, Rédei, Dávid (2021): Taxonomic corrections for East and Southeast Asian Reduviidae (Hemiptera Heteroptera). Zootaxa 4948 (4): 586-598, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4948.4.7
B22687E02502A34BFF28F893FCF41910.taxon	distribution	Distribution. CHINA: Yunnan!	en	Chen, Ling, Wang, Yang, Rédei, Dávid (2021): Taxonomic corrections for East and Southeast Asian Reduviidae (Hemiptera Heteroptera). Zootaxa 4948 (4): 586-598, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4948.4.7
B22687E02502A34BFF28F893FCF41910.taxon	discussion	Discussion. Henricohahnia wangi was described based on a single female (the holotype) from Xishuangbanna Dai Autonomous Prefecture, Yunnan, China. This specimen is deposited in NKUM and it was reexamined during the present study (Figs. 7 – 14). Henricohahnia obscara was described based on a female holotype and two female paratypes, also from Xishuangbanna. According to the original description the holotype was deposited in IZAS, but our request to this institution to study their reduviid types was declined; the satisfactory original descriptions and illustrations, however, enable an identification of this species. The specific epithet of H. obscara was spelled as obscara in pp. 155, 160, 163 and 164, but obseura in p. 156 of the paper containing the original description. The authors (Cai et al. 2003: 162) stated that “ [t] he species [is] named for its dull colour ”, therefore apparently they intended to create the name obscura from the Latin adjective obscurus, - a, - um, but this spelling does not appear in the paper, therefore the spelling obscara is selected here as the correct original spelling acting as First Reviser (ICZN 1999, Art. 32.2.1), and obseura is considered as a typographic error, hence an incorrect original spelling. The subsequent usage of the specific epithet obscura (Zhao et al. 2014: 368) must be considered as an incorrect subsequent spelling. Cai et al. (2003) did not mention H. wangi in their review of Henricohahnia from China, suggesting that they had overlooked this species. Subsequentely Zhao et al. (2014: 368) speculated that H. obscara (misspelled as obscura) differs from H. wangi by the “ apical spine of lateral pronotal angle pointed lateroposteriorly, but not upturned ” (“ distinctly upturned and pointed laterally ” in H. wangi), and “ head laterally ventrally [on] each [side] with 3 long cylindrical tubercles ” (“ with more than 3 large tubercles ” in H. wangi). These diagnostic characters were apparently based on the illustrations of Ren (2001: 1, figs. 2 and 3); the figures in concern, however, are inaccurate, especially with respect to the ventral armature of the head. The head of the holotype is shown in Figs. 10 and 11; these photographs were taken after relaxing the specimen and pulling the forelegs away, thus exposing both lateral sides of the head. The ventrolateral side of the head of the holotype is provided with four tubercles on the left side, but only three tubercles on the right side (the tubercle marked with arrow in Fig. 10 has no counterpart on the right side); the right side therefore perfectly matches the condition figured by Cai et al. (2003: 164, fig. 36) for H. obscara, rendering this diagnostic character suggested by Zhao et al. (2014) for differentiating the two species invalid. Similar to the ventrolateral tubercles on the head, the humeral processes also show considerable variability, with clear asymmetry between the left and the right side; the condition found in the holotype of H. wangi, particularly its left-hand side, is not different from the condition figured for H. obscara by Cai et al. (2003: 163 – 164, figs. 35, 36 and 41). Other diagnostic characters provided for H. obscara by Cai et al. (2003), e. g. the shape and arrangement of the tubercles on the scape or the shape of the female terminalia show a very close match with the condition found in the holotype of H. wangi (Figs. 12, 13; cf. Cai et al. 2003: 164, figs. 37 – 39 and 43, respectively). It can be concluded that currently no difference of potential specific importance can be demonstrated between H. wangi and H. obscara, therefore the subjective synonymy of the two species is hereby proposed.	en	Chen, Ling, Wang, Yang, Rédei, Dávid (2021): Taxonomic corrections for East and Southeast Asian Reduviidae (Hemiptera Heteroptera). Zootaxa 4948 (4): 586-598, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4948.4.7
B22687E02506A348FF28FE45FE76193D.taxon	description	(Figs. 15 – 19)	en	Chen, Ling, Wang, Yang, Rédei, Dávid (2021): Taxonomic corrections for East and Southeast Asian Reduviidae (Hemiptera Heteroptera). Zootaxa 4948 (4): 586-598, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4948.4.7
B22687E02506A348FF28FE45FE76193D.taxon	materials_examined	Type material examined. Pahabengkakia piliceps Miller, 1941. Holotype: ♀, “ Type ” [circle with red margin], “ MALAY PENIN: \ Selangor, F. M. S. \ Kuala Lumpur [pr, crossed over by hw] \ Kanching 18 th miles [hw, with pr dotted underline] \ Dec: 14 th [hw, with pr dotted underline] 192 [pr] 4 [hw, with pr dotted underline] \ H. M. Pendlebury. ”, “ Brit. Mus. \ 1947 - 269. ”, “ Pahabenkakia [sic] \ piliceps \ gen. nov. sp. n [all three lines in N. C. E. Miller’s hw] \ det. N. C. E. Miller 193 [pr] 8 [hw] ”; micro-pinned, right antenna, tarsi of right fore, both mid and left hind legs missing (BMNH) (Figs. 15 – 17). Additional specimens examined. LAOS: Bolikhamsay Prov., Phou Khao Khouay N [ational] B [iodiversity] C [onservation] A [rea], Tad Leuk Waterfall, 280 m, 11 – 12. iv. 1998, from and beneath bark, leg. O. Merkl & G. Csorba, No. 45 (1 ♂ 1 ♀ HNHM).	en	Chen, Ling, Wang, Yang, Rédei, Dávid (2021): Taxonomic corrections for East and Southeast Asian Reduviidae (Hemiptera Heteroptera). Zootaxa 4948 (4): 586-598, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4948.4.7
B22687E02506A348FF28FE45FE76193D.taxon	distribution	Distribution. THAILAND (Wattanachaiyingcharoen & Jongjitvimol 2007). LAOS (new country record): Bolikhamsay Prov.! VIETNAM: B ắc K ạn Prov. (Tomokuni & Cai 2004). MALAYSIA: Selangor!; Kuala Lumpur!	en	Chen, Ling, Wang, Yang, Rédei, Dávid (2021): Taxonomic corrections for East and Southeast Asian Reduviidae (Hemiptera Heteroptera). Zootaxa 4948 (4): 586-598, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4948.4.7
B22687E02506A348FF28FE45FE76193D.taxon	discussion	Discussion. The type material of Pahabengkakia piliceps consists of a female holotype from Selangor and a female paratype from Kuala Lumpur, now Malaysia (Miller 1941). Only the holotype (Figs. 15 – 17) was found in the BMNH in course of the present study. The species is the type species of the currently monotypic genus Pahabengkakia. Stalireduvius nodipes was described based on a single male (the holotype) from northern Vietnam (B ắc K ạn Prov.) (Tomokuni & Cai 2004), deposited in NSMT. Its identity is readily ascertainable from the detailed original description and illustrations. This species is the type species of the monotypic genus Stalireduvius. In spite of the considerable similarity evident from the original description and illustration of P. piliceps (Miller 1941), Tomokuni & Cai (2004) did not compare Stalireduvius with Pahabengkakia and did not note the relatedness of their included species, leaving little doubt that they simply overlooked this taxon. Their description and illustrations make it abundantly clear that S. nodipes is conspecific with P. piliceps, and accordingly the subjective synonymy of the two species and also of the two genera is hereby proposed. Pahabengkakia piliceps seems to be distributed all over Indo-China, extending to the Malay Peninsula. Although it is rare in collections, it is probably frequently overlooked due to its specialized bionomics, treated by Wattanachaiyingcharoen & Jongjitvimol (2007). The latter authors provided a photo of an adult; a better photo of a female from Laos (representing a new country record) is provided here (Figs. 18 – 19) to facilitate the identification of this genus and species.	en	Chen, Ling, Wang, Yang, Rédei, Dávid (2021): Taxonomic corrections for East and Southeast Asian Reduviidae (Hemiptera Heteroptera). Zootaxa 4948 (4): 586-598, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4948.4.7
B22687E02509A347FF28FF7EFD611D41.taxon	description	(Figs. 20 – 26)	en	Chen, Ling, Wang, Yang, Rédei, Dávid (2021): Taxonomic corrections for East and Southeast Asian Reduviidae (Hemiptera Heteroptera). Zootaxa 4948 (4): 586-598, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4948.4.7
