identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
B06687E3D3756C3585B00FE6FB0CFABE.text	B06687E3D3756C3585B00FE6FB0CFABE.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Girardia arenicola Hellmann & Leal-Zanchet	<div><p>Girardia arenicola Hellmann &amp; Leal-Zanchet; sp. nov.</p><p>Etymology: The name is formed from the Latin arena (sand), referring to the name of the type-locality (Areias = arena), and the Latin verb cólere (to inhabit).</p><p>Material examined. Holotype: MZUSP PL.2137: coll. R.L. Ferreira, 19 Julho 2012, “ Areias de Cima cave”, “Areias system”, Iporanga, São Paulo, Brazil—sagittal sections on 41 slides.</p><p>Paratypes: collected by R.L. Ferreira on the same date and the same sampling site as the holotype. MZU PL. 00275: sagittal sections on 11 slides; MZU PL. 00276: sagittal sections on 15 slides; MZU PL. 00277: sagittal sections on 23 slides; MZU PL. 00278: sagittal sections on 6 slides.</p><p>Type-locality: “ Areias de Cima cave”, “Areias system”, Iporanga, São Paulo, Brazil.</p><p>Distribution: Known only from the type-locality.</p><p>Diagnosis: Troglobitic Girardia arenicola is characterized by dorsal testes, a large and branched bulbar cavity containing various diverticula, a bursal canal almost horizontally disposed, a short common ovovitelline duct and male and female atria being separated by a constriction.</p><p>Description. External features. Live and preserved specimens whitish, both dorsally and ventrally. Triangular head with large, pointed auricles in live specimens, and a pair of small eyes; posterior tip pointed (Figs. 5–7). Body up to 14 mm long and 2 mm wide (Table 1). Mouth located in the median third of the body and gonopore in the posterior third of the body (Table 1; Fig. 7).</p><p>Epidermis, cutaneous musculature and sensory organs. The epidermis is penetrated by a xanthophil, rhabditogen secretion (rhammites), as well as by sparse secretions of three types of glands: (1) xanthophil, finely granular secretion; (2) erythrophil, finely granular secretion; (3) cyanophil amorphous secretion (Fig. 8). Cyanophil glands are more abundant in the anterior extremity of the body; openings from a fourth type of gland, producing a xanthophil coarsely granular secretion, concentrated at the body margins and medially at the anterior and posterior tips of the body.</p><p>Cutaneous musculature composed of three layers, viz. a thin subepithelial circular layer, followed by an oblique layer with decussate fibers and a thicker layer of longitudinal muscle. The cutaneous musculature is weakly developed; the ventral (10–12 µm thick), about twice as thick as the epidermis, is slightly thicker than the dorsal musculature (5–8 µm thick) in the pre-pharyngeal region.</p><p>Digestive system. Pharynx cylindrical, non-pigmented; about 1/3 to 1/4 of the body length. It is located in the median third of the body; mouth at the posterior end of the pharyngeal pouch, which shows a posterior diverticulum. No esophagus was observed. Anterior ramus of the intestine trunk dorsally to the brain.</p><p>Male reproductive system (Figs. 9–10, 12–13). Numerous testicular follicles, about 100–150 µm in diameter, arranged in two to three irregular lateral rows on either side of the body, being located next to the body margins, most of the follicles located in the dorsal body region (Fig. 9). Testes begin in the anterior 1/6th of the body, just behind the ovaries, and extend to the posterior end of the body. Sperm ducts dorsomedially to the nerve cords, expanding to form spermiducal vesicles posteriorly to the pharynx. The ducts ascend laterally to the penis, forming a loop and then recurve anteriad. While diminishing in diameter, they separately penetrate the penis bulb. The sperm ducts open symmetrically into the lateral diverticula of the bulbar cavity (Fig.10), which is large and branched, containing various diverticula (Figs. 12–13). A long and narrow ejaculatory duct traverses the conical penis papilla. The latter is about 190 µm long and 150 µm wide at its basis, being obliquely orientated in the male atrium (Figs. 12–13).</p><p>Bulbar cavity and ejaculatory duct receive the openings of abundant cyanophil penial glands, as well as scattered erythrophil glands, both glands producing a granular secretion. In addition, openings from glands producing a finely erythrophil secretion are more abundant at the distal, posterior portion of the ejaculatory duct (Fig. 12). The lining epithelium of the penis papilla and male atrium are penetrated by the sparse openings of two types of gland, one producing a amorphous, cyanophil secretion and the other a finely granular, erythrophil secretion (Fig. 12).</p><p>Female reproductive system (Figs. 9, 11–13). Vitellaria well developed, located dorsally and between intestinal branches (Fig. 9). Ovaries ovoid, about 80–90 µm in its lateral axis in the holotype. The gonads are situated dorsally to the ventral nerve cords, in close proximity to the brain, in the anterior 1/10th of the body. Ovovitelline ducts arising from the lateral surface of the ovaries and running backwards dorsally to the ventral nerve cords and ventrally to the sperm ducts. Just behind the gonoduct, the ovovitelline ducts slightly turn dorsally and fuse to form a short common section, which opens into the most distal part of the bursal canal, about halfway the distance between the dorsal and ventral epidermis (Fig. 13). Copulatory bursa ovoid with a narrow lumen, located next to the pharyngeal pocket. Bursal canal long, almost horizontally disposed, slightly bending and becoming wider just before communicating with the gonoduct (Figs. 12–13). Gonoduct almost straight (Fig. 13).</p><p>Ovovitelline ducts lined with ciliated, cuboidal epithelium with insunk nuclei, turning to a nucleated epithelium close to their joining to form the common ovovitelline duct. Bursal canal lined with a nucleated, columnar epithelium (Fig. 11), showing an irregular height close to the opening into the gonoduct. Copulatory bursa and bursal canal coated with a thin musculature (about 3–4 µm thick), which is composed of interwoven longitudinal and circular muscles. Shell glands, producing a finely granular, erythrophil secretion open into the bursal canal close to the opening of the common ovovitelline duct (Figs. 12–13).. Numerous cement glands, producing a coarsely granular, xanthophil secretion, open into the gonoduct (Figs. 12–13). In addition, the gonoduct receives the openings of other two types of scarcer glands, one producing an amorphous, cyanophil secretion and the other an erythrophil secretion.</p><p>Remarks. Specimens show fixation artifacts especially in the mesenchyme. Paratype MZU 0 0 278 shows a forked pharynx. Paratypes MZU PL.00275, MZU PL.00276 and MZU PL. 0 0 277 lost their pharynges during fixation.</p><p>Comparative discussion. With respect to its external features, Girardia arenicola differs from its congeners by having both a whitish body, as well as eyes. It resembles the hypogean Girardia mckenziei (Mitchell &amp; Kawakatsu, 1973), which has two minute eyes. However, G. mckenziei has a slightly pigmented body, whereas G. arenicola maintains a whitish colour after fixation, similarly to other troglobitic species (Mitchell &amp; Kawakatsu 1973a, b; Souza et al. 2015, 2016).</p><p>Regarding the reproductive system, G. arenicola shares some similarities with species that show dorsal or dorso-ventral testes, an almost horizontally disposed bursal canal and male and female atria separated by a constriction. These species are the following: G. anderlani (Kawakatsu &amp; Hauser, 1983), Girardia arimana (Hyman, 1957), G. chilla (Marcus, 1954), G. guatemalensis (Mitchell &amp; Kawakatsu, 1973), and G. paramensis (Fuhrmann, 1912) (Mitchell &amp; Kawakatsu 1973b; Kawakatsu &amp; Mitchell 1981; Kawakatsu et al. 1983; Sluys 1992; Sluys et al. 2005). It mainly differs from these species by the shape of the bulbar cavity and/or the course of the spem ducts through the penis bulb. In Girardia arimana, the sperm ducts traverse the penis bulb and open into the ejaculatory duct and in G. guatemalensis, G. chilla and G. paramensis there is a tubular bulbar cavity (Marcus 1954; Kawakatsu &amp; Mitchell 1981; Kawakatsu &amp; Froehlich 1992; Sluys 1992; Sluys et al. 2005), differing from the large and branched bulbar cavity with multiple diverticula of G. arenicola . In G. anderlani, the bulbar cavity is wide and with two chambers, i.e. an antero-ventral one, which receives both sperm ducts, and a blindly ending postero-dorsal chamber (Kawakatsu et al. 1983). In contrast, G. arenicola shows a bulbar cavity with multiple diverticula, receiving the sperm duct openings on each side. In addition, it is noteworthy the occurrence of a common ovovitelline duct, similarly to G. arimana, among others. However, G. arenicola can be easily differentiated from G. arimana, since in G. arimana the common ovovitelline duct is relatively longer and the sperm ducts traverse the penis bulb, joining to open directly into the ejaculatory duct (Sluys 1992).</p><p>The shape of the bulbar cavity of G. arenicola, as well as the openings of the sperm ducts in this cavity resemble the situation in the troglobitic G. multidiverticulata Souza et al., 2015, which shows a large bulbar cavity, with multiple diverticula, receiving the opening of each sperm duct in one of its lateral diverticula (Souza et al. 2015). However, G. multidiverticulata shows mainly ventral testes, contrasting to the mainly dorsal testes of G. arenicola . Other details of the copulatory apparatus distinguish G. arenicola from G. multidiverticulata, since G. arenicola has a smaller number of diverticula in the bulbar cavity and a large and conical penis papilla with a long and slender ejaculatory duct. In contrast, G. multidiverticulata shows a large number of diverticula in the bulbar cavity, a short and blunt penis papilla and a small and wide ejaculatory duct (Souza et al. 2015).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B06687E3D3756C3585B00FE6FB0CFABE	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Hellmann, Lindsey;Leal-Zanchet, Ana Maria;Ferreira, Rodrigo Lopes	Hellmann, Lindsey, Leal-Zanchet, Ana Maria, Ferreira, Rodrigo Lopes (2018): Two new sympatric troglobitic freshwater flatworms (Platyhelminthes: Dugesiidae) from a hotspot of subterranean biodiversity in the Neotropics. Zootaxa 4438 (3): 561-574, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4438.3.8
B06687E3D3716C3F85B00B67FEA5FF67.text	B06687E3D3716C3F85B00B67FEA5FF67.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Girardia paucipunctata Hellmann & Leal-Zanchet	<div><p>Girardia paucipunctata Hellmann &amp; Leal-Zanchet; sp. nov.</p><p>Etymology: The name is composed of the Latin prefix paucus (a few) and the adjective punctatus (spotted), alluding to the slightly pigmented body.</p><p>Material examined. Holotype: MZUSP PL.2138: coll. R.L. Ferreira, 19 July 2012, “ Areias de Cima cave”, “ Areias system”, Iporanga, São Paulo, Brazil—sagittal sections on 13 slides.</p><p>Paratypes: collected by R.L. Ferreira on the same date and at the same sampling locality as the holotype. MZU PL. 00279: sagittal sections on 6 slides; MZU PL.00280: sagittal sections on 7 slides; MZU PL. 00281: transverse sections on 8 slides.</p><p>Type-locality: “ Areias de Cima cave”, “Areias system”, Iporanga, São Paulo, Brazil.</p><p>Distribution: Known only from the type-locality.</p><p>Diagnosis: Troglobitic Girardia paucipunctata is characterized by dorso-ventral testes, a wide and ovoid bulbar cavity, a smoothly inclined bursal canal, a short common ovovitelline duct and male and female atria separated by a constriction.</p><p>Description. External features. After fixation, pale brownish dorsal surface with scattered, fine pigmentation (Fig. 14). Ventral surface whitish (Fig. 15). Triangular head with moderately sized auricles and a pair of minute eyes; posterior tip rounded (Figs. 14–15). Body up to 5 mm long and 2 mm wide (Table 2). Mouth located in the median or posterior third of the body and gonopore in the posterior third of the body (Table 2; Fig. 15).</p><p>Epidermis, cutaneous musculature and sensory organs. The epidermis is pierced by openings from rhabditogen glands producing xanthophil rhammites, as well as from glands producing an amorphous, cyanophil secretion (Figs. 16, 21). Cyanophil glands are more abundant in the anterior extremity of the body. In addition, slightly erythrophil glands with coarsely granular secretion concentrate their openings at the body margins as well as medially at the posterior tip of the body, whereas the anterior tip receives finely granular, xanthophil secretion. Body pigment granules located beneath the epidermis.</p><p>Cutaneous musculature consisting of four layers, viz. a thin subepithelial circular layer, followed by a thin longitudinal layer, an oblique layer with decussate fibers and a thicker layer of longitudinal muscle (Fig. 16). The cutaneous musculature is weakly developed, with the ventral musculature (8–10 µm thick) being slightly thicker than the dorsal musculature (4–5 µm thick), having about the same thickness as the epidermis, in the pre-pharyngeal region. The cutaneous musculature is thicker laterally than medially and becomes thicker at the anterior region of the body.</p><p>Digestive system. Pharynx cylindrical, pigmented; about 1/5th of the body length. It is located in the median third of the body. Mouth at the posterior end of the pharyngeal pouch. An esophagus, between about 1/9th of the pharyngeal length, connects the pharynx with the intestine. Anterior intestinal trunk extending dorsally to the brain. Male reproductive system (Figs. 17–20, 22). Numerous testicular follicles, about 70–90 µm in diameter, arranged in various irregular dorso-ventral rows on either side of the body (Fig. 17). Testes extend from about just behind the ovaries to the posterior end of the body. Sperm ducts form spermiducal vesicles posteriorly to the pharynx, which ascend in an almost straight course laterally to the penis. Subsequently, the ducts decrease in diameter and turn anteriad to separately penetrate the penis bulb. The sperm ducts open dorsolaterally into the wide and ovoid bulbar cavity (Figs. 18, 22). The short ejaculatory duct opens at the tip of the conical penis papilla (Figs. 19, 22). The penis papilla is obliquely oriented in the male atrium, being about 150 µm long and 200 µm wide at its basis.</p><p>Penial glands producing fine, slightly erythrophil granules (perhaps with a cyanophil external part) discharge into the bulbar cavity and ejaculatory duct. This secretion is also present in the bulbar cavity (Figs. 18–20). Xanthophil glands and cyanophil glands, both with amorphous secretions, and erythrophil glands with finely granular secretion, open through the epithelium of the penis papilla, whereas sparse glands with an amorphous, slightly cyanophil secretion open into the male atrium.</p><p>Female reproductive system (Figs. 19–22). Vitellaria well developed in the holotype. Ovaries ovoid, about 130 µm in its lateral axis. The gonads are situated laterally to the ventral nerve cords, in close proximity of the brain, in the anterior 1/7th of the body. Ovovitelline ducts arise from the ventro-lateral surface of the ovaries, running backwards dorsally to the nerve cords, following a sinuous path. Behind the gonoduct, the ovovitelline ducts turn dorsally to join, more close to the ventral than to the dorsal epidermis, to form a short common section, which opens into the most distal part of the bursal canal (Fig. 22). Copulatory bursa ovoid, located anterodorsaly to the penis bulb (Figs. 19, 22). Bursal canal short, smoothly inclining ventrally to opening into the gonoduct, which is almost straight (Figs. 20, 22).</p><p>Copulatory bursa and bursal canal coated with interwoven longitudinal and circular muscles (about 2–5 µm thick). Bursal canal lined with a columnar, nucleated epithelium (Fig. 21). Xanthophil shell glands with finely granular secretion concentrate their openings into the most distal part of the canal, ventrally to the opening of the common ovovitelline duct. Cyanophil glands, as well as numerous cement glands, producing a coarsely granular, xanthophil secretion, discharge into the gonoduct (Figs. 19, 20, 22).</p><p>Comparative discussion. Regarding external features, besides differing from its epigean congeners, the trogobitic Girardia paucipunctata differs from most of other hypogean species by having a slightly pigmented dorsal surface and a pair of minute eyes (Mitchell &amp; Kawakatsu 1973b; Souza et al. 2015, 2016). Similar features are found only in the hypogean G. mckenziei (Mitchell &amp; Kawakatsu 1973a) .</p><p>With respect to the sympatric G. arenicola, herein described, mature specimens of G. paucipunctata have a smaller body and a weak pigmentation that is absent in G. arenicola . Regarding the pharynx, in G. arenicola it is non-pigmented and larger in relation to the body length, in contrast to the pigmented and smaller pharynx of G. paucipunctata . With respect to the reproductive system, G. paucipunctata shows overall similarities with G. arenicola, since both species have dorsal testes and a short common ovovitelline duct. However, G. paucipunctata can be easily differentiated from G. arenicola, since the latter has an almost horizontally disposed bursal canal, a bulbar cavity with multiple diverticula and sperm ducts opening laterally into the diverticula of the bulbar cavity. In contrast, G. paucipunctata has a smoothly curved bursal canal and an ovoid and unforked bulbar cavity, with the sperm ducts opening in their dorsolateral walls.</p><p>Among species of Girardia with dorsal or dorsoventral testes and a smoothly curved bursal canal, G. paucipunctata shares some similarities with G. antillana (Kenk, 1941), G. arizonensis (Kenk, 1975), G. avertiginis Sluys, 2005, G. barbarae (Mitchell &amp; Kawakatsu, 1973), G. capacivasa Sluys &amp; Kawakatsu, 2005, G. mckenziei and G. typhlomexicana (Mitchell &amp; Kawakatsu 1973a, b; Kenk 1975; Sluys 1992; Sluys et al. 2005). Similarly to these species, G. paucipunctata shows a wide bulbar cavity, while male and female atria separated from each other by a constriction.</p><p>Girardia paucipunctata can be distinguished from G. antillana, G. barbarae and G. capacivasa by having a single bulbar cavity with the sperm ducts opening into this cavity without expansions. In contrast, G. antillana shows a forked bulbar cavity with a blindly ending accessory chamber, G. barbarae have a forked and elongated oval-shaped bulbar cavity and G. capacivasa has large intrabulbar sections of the sperm ducts (Mitchell &amp; Kawakatsu 1973b; Sluys 1992; Sluys et al. 2005). Being unforked, the bulbar cavity of G. paucipunctata is similar to that of G. avertiginis, G. arizonensis and G. mckenziei . However, in G. arizonensis and G. mckenziei, testes are absent behind the gonopore (Mitchell &amp; Kawakatsu 1973a; Kenk 1975), whereas in G. paucipunctata they extend to the posterior tip of the body. In addition, in G. mckenziei, the sperm ducts traverse the penis bulb to open terminally into a short and wide lumen of the penis papilla (Mitchell &amp; Kawakatsu 1973a), differing from the situation in G. paucipunctata, since in this species the broad and ovoid bulbar cavity occupies the entire penis bulb and receives the sperm ducts dorsolaterally. The opening position of the sperm ducts into the bulbar cavity also distinguish G. paucipunctata from G. avertiginis, since in the latter the sperm ducts open into the lateral wall of the bulbar cavity. In G. typhlomexicana, the bulbar cavity may be forked in some specimens (Mitchell &amp; Kawakatsu 1973b), but G. paucipunctata differs from G. typhlomexicana especially by having sperm ducts opening dorsolaterally into the bulbar cavity, whereas in G. typhlomexicana the sperm ducts open terminally through the anterior wall of this cavity (Mitchell &amp; Kawakatsu 1973b). In addition, the bursal canal of G. paucipunctata, with intermingled muscles also distinguishes this species from G. antillana, G. barbarae, G. arizonensis, G. mckenziei and G. typhlomexicana, which show circular subepithelial muscles followed by longitudinal muscles (Kenk 1975; Mitchell &amp; Kawakatsu 1973a, b; Sluys 1992; Sluys et al. 2005).</p><p>Notes on ecology and distribution. Both flatworm species were sampled in a single set of pools in travertine rock (Figs. 3, 4) situated in the eastern branch of “Areias de Cima” cave, thus being syntopic. The water hydrochemistry at the date of collection was as follows: pH = 8.0, temperature = 17.9°C, conductivity = 117.7 and dissolved oxygen = 5.30 g/l. The small set of pools (Fig. 4) is formed by water percolating from the epicarstic zone. Considering the fact that during flooding some pools can be submerged by the stream, the species may have colonized these pools from the stream. However, no specimens of either species were found in the streams during four sampling events in the cave streams between 2012 and 2014, in both rainy and dry seasons, in a total of 13 areas inside the caves. This fact strongly suggests that the main habitat of both species is the epikarst, and not the lothic subterranean system. Immediately adjacent to this sampling site, the troglobitic amphipod Hyallela epikastica Rodrigues et al., 2014 was discovered. This crustacean species was also found only at this site, thus also suggesting an epikarstic origin (Rodrigues et al. 2014).</p><p>Usually, species presenting similar habits (especially feeding habits or strategies) tend to exclude each other when co-occurring in a given habitat (Hardin, 1960). Considering the restricted food supply typically observed in caves, competitive exclusion even may be stronger. Thus, the occurrence of two sympatric flatworm species living in such a restricted and specialized habitat would be possible only if competitive exclusion is weak. The body size of both species is quite different, with G. arenicola being almost 3 times longer than G. paucipunctata, thus suggesting that the species may be exploring different microhabitats or even distinct resources in the same habitat. In another karst area in Brazil, distinct species of amphibious Styloniscidae isopods were also observed sharing the same set of pools in travertine rock (R. Ferreira, unpublished data). Similar differences in size were observed in the isopod species, suggesting that size differentiation could act indeed to diminish competitive exclusion in such restricted habitats.</p><p>The morphological features of both species, which show small eyes and an unpigmented or only weakly pigmented body, as well as their location in pools formed by percolating water suggest that they are stygobiont. The fact that both species were collected only once at a single site in the period between July, 2012 and February, 2014, when four expeditions were made into this cave system, suggests that they have a very restricted distribution. The “Areias system” is a well-studied cave system, being considered as the richest system for subterranean fauna in Brazil (Trajano 2007; De Ázara &amp; Ferreira 2013; Rodrigues et al. 2014) and also one of the two hotspots of subterranean biodiversity in South America (Souza-Silva &amp; Ferreira 2016); it is located in a preserved area (Parque Estadual Turístico do Alto Ribeira). Hence, the environment from where both flatworms were collected seems to be well protected.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B06687E3D3716C3F85B00B67FEA5FF67	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Hellmann, Lindsey;Leal-Zanchet, Ana Maria;Ferreira, Rodrigo Lopes	Hellmann, Lindsey, Leal-Zanchet, Ana Maria, Ferreira, Rodrigo Lopes (2018): Two new sympatric troglobitic freshwater flatworms (Platyhelminthes: Dugesiidae) from a hotspot of subterranean biodiversity in the Neotropics. Zootaxa 4438 (3): 561-574, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4438.3.8
