taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
B66BDD2A082BFF9EE36774C5FEB6E16B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5300253/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5300253	Figure 4. Scelidosaurus harrisonii Owen, 1861. Cranial anatomy reconstructed in: A, lateral; B, dorsal views (modified from Norman, 2020a: figs 8, 9).	Figure 4. Scelidosaurus harrisonii Owen, 1861. Cranial anatomy reconstructed in: A, lateral; B, dorsal views (modified from Norman, 2020a: figs 8, 9).	2021-01-01	Norman, David B		Zenodo	biologists	Norman, David B			
B66BDD2A082BFF9EE36774C5FEB6E16B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5300255/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5300255	Figure 5. Chelonia mydas (Linnaeus, 1758) – the Green Turtle. External skull anatomy. A, lateral and B, dorsal views, illustrating the superficial cranial osteology. C, lateral and D, dorsal views showing the distribution of keratinous scutes. Norman, pers.colln (ex-University of Cambridge Zoology Department teachingcollection).Scale bar indicated.Abbreviations: au, auditory recess; au.sc, auditory recess scute covering; tom, the chelonian tomium (= rhamphotheca of Scelidosaurus).	Figure 5. Chelonia mydas (Linnaeus, 1758) – the Green Turtle. External skull anatomy. A, lateral and B, dorsal views, illustrating the superficial cranial osteology. C, lateral and D, dorsal views showing the distribution of keratinous scutes. Norman, pers.colln (ex-University of Cambridge Zoology Department teachingcollection).Scale bar indicated.Abbreviations: au, auditory recess; au.sc, auditory recess scute covering; tom, the chelonian tomium (= rhamphotheca of Scelidosaurus).	2021-01-01	Norman, David B		Zenodo	biologists	Norman, David B			
B66BDD2A082BFF9EE36774C5FEB6E16B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5300257/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5300257	Figure 6. Scelidosaurus. An interpretation of the cranial keratinous scute pattern on the skull and mandible in (A) lateral and (B) dorsal views. Abbreviations: asc, angular scute; fsc, frontal scute; dsc, dentary scute or sheath; hsc, occipital horn scute; itsc, infratemporal scutes; jsc, jugal arch scutes; lsc, lacrimal scute; msc, maxillary scute (there may have been several); nmsc, nasal median scute; nsc, nasal scutes restored as overlapping plates; pdsc, predentary scute (rhamphotheca); posc, postorbital crater-like scute; qjsc, quadratojugal–quadrate scute; rsc, rhamphothecal scute of the premaxilla; sosc, supraorbital (brow-ridge) scute (there may have been several); stsc, supratemporal scutes; tym, tympanic membrane;?, area on the surface of the lacrimal lamina that is devoid of exostoses and may mark the location of a diverticulum of a cranial sinus.	Figure 6. Scelidosaurus. An interpretation of the cranial keratinous scute pattern on the skull and mandible in (A) lateral and (B) dorsal views. Abbreviations: asc, angular scute; fsc, frontal scute; dsc, dentary scute or sheath; hsc, occipital horn scute; itsc, infratemporal scutes; jsc, jugal arch scutes; lsc, lacrimal scute; msc, maxillary scute (there may have been several); nmsc, nasal median scute; nsc, nasal scutes restored as overlapping plates; pdsc, predentary scute (rhamphotheca); posc, postorbital crater-like scute; qjsc, quadratojugal–quadrate scute; rsc, rhamphothecal scute of the premaxilla; sosc, supraorbital (brow-ridge) scute (there may have been several); stsc, supratemporal scutes; tym, tympanic membrane;?, area on the surface of the lacrimal lamina that is devoid of exostoses and may mark the location of a diverticulum of a cranial sinus.	2021-01-01	Norman, David B		Zenodo	biologists	Norman, David B			
B66BDD2A082BFF9EE36774C5FEB6E16B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5300259/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5300259	Figure 7. Ovis aries Linnaeus, 1758. A, lateral view of cranial osteology showing the horn core. B, the horn core with its keratinous horn superimposed, showing the lack of correspondence in shape between the horn core and its overlying keratinous casque (horn). Norman, pers. colln (Rough Fell sheep, Sedbergh, Cumbria). Abbreviations: hc, horn core; kh, keratinous horn. Scale bar indicated.	Figure 7. Ovis aries Linnaeus, 1758. A, lateral view of cranial osteology showing the horn core. B, the horn core with its keratinous horn superimposed, showing the lack of correspondence in shape between the horn core and its overlying keratinous casque (horn). Norman, pers. colln (Rough Fell sheep, Sedbergh, Cumbria). Abbreviations: hc, horn core; kh, keratinous horn. Scale bar indicated.	2021-01-01	Norman, David B		Zenodo	biologists	Norman, David B			
B66BDD2A0835FF8AE0A372B0FD52E72D.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5496179/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5496179	Figure 22. Cartoons approximating pelvic region crosssectional body profiles of (A) an ankylosaur and (B) a stegosaur.	Figure 22. Cartoons approximating pelvic region crosssectional body profiles of (A) an ankylosaur and (B) a stegosaur.	2021-01-01	Norman, David B		Zenodo	biologists	Norman, David B			
B66BDD2A0831FFB7E0AE7779FBEBE20D.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5496187/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5496187	Figure 27. Theropod skeletal forms. A, Herrerasaurus (a dinosauriform, stem-dinosaur or a basal theropod – according to various analyses). B, Allosaurus a tetanuran theropod – see Fig. 28). C, Ornithomimus a coelurosaur. D, Nothronychus, a coelurosaur. E, Oviraptor, a maniraptoran. F, Deinonychus, a paravian. Herrerasaurus and all other theropods possess gastralia. Images kindly provided by Scott Hartman who retains the copyright of each. Scale bar in centimetres.	Figure 27. Theropod skeletal forms. A, Herrerasaurus (a dinosauriform, stem-dinosaur or a basal theropod – according to various analyses). B, Allosaurus a tetanuran theropod – see Fig. 28). C, Ornithomimus a coelurosaur. D, Nothronychus, a coelurosaur. E, Oviraptor, a maniraptoran. F, Deinonychus, a paravian. Herrerasaurus and all other theropods possess gastralia. Images kindly provided by Scott Hartman who retains the copyright of each. Scale bar in centimetres.	2021-01-01	Norman, David B		Zenodo	biologists	Norman, David B			
B66BDD2A0831FFB7E0AE7779FBEBE20D.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5300289/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5300289	Figure 28. Simplified theropod phylogeny. All tetanuran theropods have gastralia; these are only lost in true birds (n.gast). The orientation of the pubis varies across these clades and is dependent upon multiple factors: dietary preference (herbivory, omnivory, carnivory); body proportions (notably the reduction in length and mass of the tail); and more specific locomotor adaptations and habits of individual theropods within each subclade. There is no simple and unambiguous correspondence between pelvic structure and posture, habit, locomotor style or putative diet and respiratory mechanics. Dinosaur images kindly provided by Scott Hartman, who retains the copyright of each. As illustrated here these animals are not strictly to the same scale. The raptor silhouette was made available through the following website: http://clipart-library.com/bird-silhouette.html	Figure 28. Simplified theropod phylogeny. All tetanuran theropods have gastralia; these are only lost in true birds (n.gast). The orientation of the pubis varies across these clades and is dependent upon multiple factors: dietary preference (herbivory, omnivory, carnivory); body proportions (notably the reduction in length and mass of the tail); and more specific locomotor adaptations and habits of individual theropods within each subclade. There is no simple and unambiguous correspondence between pelvic structure and posture, habit, locomotor style or putative diet and respiratory mechanics. Dinosaur images kindly provided by Scott Hartman, who retains the copyright of each. As illustrated here these animals are not strictly to the same scale. The raptor silhouette was made available through the following website: http://clipart-library.com/bird-silhouette.html	2021-01-01	Norman, David B		Zenodo	biologists	Norman, David B			
B66BDD2A0831FFB7E0AE7779FBEBE20D.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5496183/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5496183	Figure24. Asimplified phylogenyofdinosaurs(afterBaron et al., 2017b). Note that gastralia are lost independently in sauropods and ornithischians but retained in all other clades [being also lost independently in the derived, powered flight-capable, Theropoda (= birds)].	Figure24. Asimplified phylogenyofdinosaurs(afterBaron et al., 2017b). Note that gastralia are lost independently in sauropods and ornithischians but retained in all other clades [being also lost independently in the derived, powered flight-capable, Theropoda (= birds)].	2021-01-01	Norman, David B		Zenodo	biologists	Norman, David B			
B66BDD2A080EFFB4E3047052FD54E2CB.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5300285/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5300285	Figure 25. Ornithischian skeletal forms. A, Eocursor. B, Edmontonia. C, Stegosaurus. No gastralia are present in these or any other known ornithischians. Images kindly provided by Scott Hartman who retains the copyright of each. Scale bars in centimetres.	Figure 25. Ornithischian skeletal forms. A, Eocursor. B, Edmontonia. C, Stegosaurus. No gastralia are present in these or any other known ornithischians. Images kindly provided by Scott Hartman who retains the copyright of each. Scale bars in centimetres.	2021-01-01	Norman, David B		Zenodo	biologists	Norman, David B			
B66BDD2A080DFFB3E0AE710AFB51E22F.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5496185/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5496185	Figure 26. Sauropodomorph skeletal forms. A, Plateosaurus (a prosauropod). B, Nigersaurus (a sauropod). Gastralia are present in the prosauropod, but no sauropods possess gastralia. Images kindly provided by Scott Hartman who retains the copyright of each. Scale bar in centimetres.	Figure 26. Sauropodomorph skeletal forms. A, Plateosaurus (a prosauropod). B, Nigersaurus (a sauropod). Gastralia are present in the prosauropod, but no sauropods possess gastralia. Images kindly provided by Scott Hartman who retains the copyright of each. Scale bar in centimetres.	2021-01-01	Norman, David B		Zenodo	biologists	Norman, David B			
B66BDD2A080DFFB3E0AE710AFB51E22F.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5496183/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5496183	Figure24. Asimplified phylogenyofdinosaurs(afterBaron et al., 2017b). Note that gastralia are lost independently in sauropods and ornithischians but retained in all other clades [being also lost independently in the derived, powered flight-capable, Theropoda (= birds)].	Figure24. Asimplified phylogenyofdinosaurs(afterBaron et al., 2017b). Note that gastralia are lost independently in sauropods and ornithischians but retained in all other clades [being also lost independently in the derived, powered flight-capable, Theropoda (= birds)].	2021-01-01	Norman, David B		Zenodo	biologists	Norman, David B			
B66BDD2A080DFFB3E0AE710AFB51E22F.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5496187/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5496187	Figure 27. Theropod skeletal forms. A, Herrerasaurus (a dinosauriform, stem-dinosaur or a basal theropod – according to various analyses). B, Allosaurus a tetanuran theropod – see Fig. 28). C, Ornithomimus a coelurosaur. D, Nothronychus, a coelurosaur. E, Oviraptor, a maniraptoran. F, Deinonychus, a paravian. Herrerasaurus and all other theropods possess gastralia. Images kindly provided by Scott Hartman who retains the copyright of each. Scale bar in centimetres.	Figure 27. Theropod skeletal forms. A, Herrerasaurus (a dinosauriform, stem-dinosaur or a basal theropod – according to various analyses). B, Allosaurus a tetanuran theropod – see Fig. 28). C, Ornithomimus a coelurosaur. D, Nothronychus, a coelurosaur. E, Oviraptor, a maniraptoran. F, Deinonychus, a paravian. Herrerasaurus and all other theropods possess gastralia. Images kindly provided by Scott Hartman who retains the copyright of each. Scale bar in centimetres.	2021-01-01	Norman, David B		Zenodo	biologists	Norman, David B			
B66BDD2A080DFFB3E0AE710AFB51E22F.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5300289/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5300289	Figure 28. Simplified theropod phylogeny. All tetanuran theropods have gastralia; these are only lost in true birds (n.gast). The orientation of the pubis varies across these clades and is dependent upon multiple factors: dietary preference (herbivory, omnivory, carnivory); body proportions (notably the reduction in length and mass of the tail); and more specific locomotor adaptations and habits of individual theropods within each subclade. There is no simple and unambiguous correspondence between pelvic structure and posture, habit, locomotor style or putative diet and respiratory mechanics. Dinosaur images kindly provided by Scott Hartman, who retains the copyright of each. As illustrated here these animals are not strictly to the same scale. The raptor silhouette was made available through the following website: http://clipart-library.com/bird-silhouette.html	Figure 28. Simplified theropod phylogeny. All tetanuran theropods have gastralia; these are only lost in true birds (n.gast). The orientation of the pubis varies across these clades and is dependent upon multiple factors: dietary preference (herbivory, omnivory, carnivory); body proportions (notably the reduction in length and mass of the tail); and more specific locomotor adaptations and habits of individual theropods within each subclade. There is no simple and unambiguous correspondence between pelvic structure and posture, habit, locomotor style or putative diet and respiratory mechanics. Dinosaur images kindly provided by Scott Hartman, who retains the copyright of each. As illustrated here these animals are not strictly to the same scale. The raptor silhouette was made available through the following website: http://clipart-library.com/bird-silhouette.html	2021-01-01	Norman, David B		Zenodo	biologists	Norman, David B			
B66BDD2A080AFFB0E3EE7089FBA5E0CF.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5300291/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5300291	Figure 29. Scelidosaurus. Myological mapping. Scapula and coracoid, based on the lectotype NHMUK R1111 (A, lateral; B, medial). Humerus, based on the referred specimen BRSMG LEGL 0005 (C, posterior; D, anterior). After Norman (2020b: figs 56, 58,63).Abbreviations:bi, m.biceps; cuc,m.cucullaris;br, m.brachialis;dc,clavicular deltoid;ds, scapular deltoid; ld-tm, mm. latissimus dorsi-teres major; p, m. pectoralis; sbs, m. subscapularis; sh, m. scapulohumeralis; sc, m. supracoracoideus; scc, m. subcoracoideus; tra-ls, mm. trapezius-levator scapulae. Scale bars in centimetres.	Figure 29. Scelidosaurus. Myological mapping. Scapula and coracoid, based on the lectotype NHMUK R1111 (A, lateral; B, medial). Humerus, based on the referred specimen BRSMG LEGL 0005 (C, posterior; D, anterior). After Norman (2020b: figs 56, 58,63).Abbreviations:bi, m.biceps; cuc,m.cucullaris;br, m.brachialis;dc,clavicular deltoid;ds, scapular deltoid; ld-tm, mm. latissimus dorsi-teres major; p, m. pectoralis; sbs, m. subscapularis; sh, m. scapulohumeralis; sc, m. supracoracoideus; scc, m. subcoracoideus; tra-ls, mm. trapezius-levator scapulae. Scale bars in centimetres.	2021-01-01	Norman, David B		Zenodo	biologists	Norman, David B			
B66BDD2A081CFFA3E09C756FFA28E450.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5496189/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5496189	Figure 32. Scelidosaurus. Femoral muscle maps. Includes small and large femora to show the change of curvature of shaft that occurs during ontogeny. A. ‘juvenile’ (NHMUK R6704 – after Norman, 2020b: fig. 79). B–D, ‘adult’ (NHMUK R1111 – the lectotype, after Norman, 2020b: fig. 78) in medial (B), anterior (C) and lateral (D). Abbreviations: add, adductor; cfb, m. caudifemoralis brevis; cfl, m. caudifemoralis longus; ft, m. femorotibialis; if, m. iliofemoralis; if?, possible area for attachment of a slip of the m. iliofemoralis; itr-pife?, area available for insertion of the m. iliotrochantericus (m. iliofemoralis) and perhaps the m. puboischiofemoralis externus (site of origin uncertain); ist, m. ischiotrochantericus; pifi, m. puboischiofemoralis internus.	Figure 32. Scelidosaurus. Femoral muscle maps. Includes small and large femora to show the change of curvature of shaft that occurs during ontogeny. A. ‘juvenile’ (NHMUK R6704 – after Norman, 2020b: fig. 79). B–D, ‘adult’ (NHMUK R1111 – the lectotype, after Norman, 2020b: fig. 78) in medial (B), anterior (C) and lateral (D). Abbreviations: add, adductor; cfb, m. caudifemoralis brevis; cfl, m. caudifemoralis longus; ft, m. femorotibialis; if, m. iliofemoralis; if?, possible area for attachment of a slip of the m. iliofemoralis; itr-pife?, area available for insertion of the m. iliotrochantericus (m. iliofemoralis) and perhaps the m. puboischiofemoralis externus (site of origin uncertain); ist, m. ischiotrochantericus; pifi, m. puboischiofemoralis internus.	2021-01-01	Norman, David B		Zenodo	biologists	Norman, David B			
B66BDD2A081CFFA3E09C756FFA28E450.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5496193/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5496193	Figure 34. Scelidosaurus cf. harrisonii. Femur (NHMUK OR41322) crushed proximally, but showing a welldeveloped 4th trochanter that is secondarily thickened by the addition of a layer of metaplastic bone over its surface. The metaplastic bone derives from calcification of the caudifemoral tendons where they attach to the trochanter. Abbreviations: 4tr, 4th trochanter; fc, fibular condyle; mpb, metaplastic bone; tc, tibial condyle. Scale bar in centimetres.	Figure 34. Scelidosaurus cf. harrisonii. Femur (NHMUK OR41322) crushed proximally, but showing a welldeveloped 4th trochanter that is secondarily thickened by the addition of a layer of metaplastic bone over its surface. The metaplastic bone derives from calcification of the caudifemoral tendons where they attach to the trochanter. Abbreviations: 4tr, 4th trochanter; fc, fibular condyle; mpb, metaplastic bone; tc, tibial condyle. Scale bar in centimetres.	2021-01-01	Norman, David B		Zenodo	biologists	Norman, David B			
B66BDD2A081CFFA3E09C756FFA28E450.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5300253/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5300253	Figure 4. Scelidosaurus harrisonii Owen, 1861. Cranial anatomy reconstructed in: A, lateral; B, dorsal views (modified from Norman, 2020a: figs 8, 9).	Figure 4. Scelidosaurus harrisonii Owen, 1861. Cranial anatomy reconstructed in: A, lateral; B, dorsal views (modified from Norman, 2020a: figs 8, 9).	2021-01-01	Norman, David B		Zenodo	biologists	Norman, David B			
B66BDD2A081CFFA3E09C756FFA28E450.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5496191/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5496191	Figure 31. Pelvic reconstructions in left lateral view. A, Scelidosaurus (after Norman, 2020b: fig. 77). B, Euoplocephalus (after Coombs, 1978a). C, Stegosaurus (after Gilmore, 1914).	Figure 31. Pelvic reconstructions in left lateral view. A, Scelidosaurus (after Norman, 2020b: fig. 77). B, Euoplocephalus (after Coombs, 1978a). C, Stegosaurus (after Gilmore, 1914).	2021-01-01	Norman, David B		Zenodo	biologists	Norman, David B			
B66BDD2A081CFFA3E09C756FFA28E450.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5300295/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5300295	Figure 33. Scelidosaurus. Myology of the principal pelvis and hindlimb reconstructedas lines of action.Abbreviations: add,adductor; amb, m. ambiens; cfb, m. caudifemoralis brevis; cfl, m. caudifemoralis longus; ft, m. femorotibialis; fte, m. flexor tibialis externus; if, m. iliofemoralis; ifib, m.iliofibularis; ist, m.ischiotrochantericus; it, m.iliotibialis; itr, m. iliotrochantericus (avian-equivalent subdivision of the iliofemoralis); pifi, m. puboischiofemoralis internus.	Figure 33. Scelidosaurus. Myology of the principal pelvis and hindlimb reconstructedas lines of action.Abbreviations: add,adductor; amb, m. ambiens; cfb, m. caudifemoralis brevis; cfl, m. caudifemoralis longus; ft, m. femorotibialis; fte, m. flexor tibialis externus; if, m. iliofemoralis; ifib, m.iliofibularis; ist, m.ischiotrochantericus; it, m.iliotibialis; itr, m. iliotrochantericus (avian-equivalent subdivision of the iliofemoralis); pifi, m. puboischiofemoralis internus.	2021-01-01	Norman, David B		Zenodo	biologists	Norman, David B			
B66BDD2A081CFFA3E09C756FFA28E450.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5496195/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5496195	Figure 35. Scelidosaurus. Femur and hindlimb motion examined. The principal lines of action of retractor muscles and their influence upon the femur and hindlimb poses have been reconstructed as a series of cartoons. A, dorsal view of the femur in ‘neutral’ pose with lines of action of main muscles: note in particular the lateral or medial attachment of these muscles on the femoral shaft. B, vertical pose of the femur with an indication of the posteromedial lines of action of the powerful limb retractors (cfb/l, m. caudifemoralis; add, m. adductor). C, cross-section through the femoral shaft at the level of the 4th trochanter showing the torsion inducing lines of action of the principal protractors (pifi, ist) and retractors (if, cfb, cfl). D, mechanical influence on hindlimb protraction resulting from the breadth of the gut. E, oblique-to-parasagittal hindlimb excursion during the protraction-retraction cycle.	Figure 35. Scelidosaurus. Femur and hindlimb motion examined. The principal lines of action of retractor muscles and their influence upon the femur and hindlimb poses have been reconstructed as a series of cartoons. A, dorsal view of the femur in ‘neutral’ pose with lines of action of main muscles: note in particular the lateral or medial attachment of these muscles on the femoral shaft. B, vertical pose of the femur with an indication of the posteromedial lines of action of the powerful limb retractors (cfb/l, m. caudifemoralis; add, m. adductor). C, cross-section through the femoral shaft at the level of the 4th trochanter showing the torsion inducing lines of action of the principal protractors (pifi, ist) and retractors (if, cfb, cfl). D, mechanical influence on hindlimb protraction resulting from the breadth of the gut. E, oblique-to-parasagittal hindlimb excursion during the protraction-retraction cycle.	2021-01-01	Norman, David B		Zenodo	biologists	Norman, David B			
B66BDD2A081CFFA3E09C756FFA28E450.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5496179/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5496179	Figure 22. Cartoons approximating pelvic region crosssectional body profiles of (A) an ankylosaur and (B) a stegosaur.	Figure 22. Cartoons approximating pelvic region crosssectional body profiles of (A) an ankylosaur and (B) a stegosaur.	2021-01-01	Norman, David B		Zenodo	biologists	Norman, David B			
B66BDD2A0819FFAEE370702DFC78E4BD.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5300247/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5300247	Figure 2. Scelidosaurus harrisonii Owen, 1861 (LYMPH 1998 6.1-6.7).The small(‘foetal’) specimen from Charmouth. Part of the paratype series belonging to the name S. harrisonii. These specimens belong to a small individual and appear to be associated. They were illustrated in Richard Owen’s first monograph (Owen, 1861: tab. III).	Figure 2. Scelidosaurus harrisonii Owen, 1861 (LYMPH 1998 6.1-6.7).The small(‘foetal’) specimen from Charmouth. Part of the paratype series belonging to the name S. harrisonii. These specimens belong to a small individual and appear to be associated. They were illustrated in Richard Owen’s first monograph (Owen, 1861: tab. III).	2021-01-01	Norman, David B		Zenodo	biologists	Norman, David B			
B66BDD2A0815FFABE1747253FDC4E2E2.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5496201/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5496201	Figure 38. Early (non-numerical) cladistics-based attempt to establish a topology for armoured (thyreophoran) dinosaurs within the clade Ornithischia. This topology is derived from Sereno (1986: fig. 3).	Figure 38. Early (non-numerical) cladistics-based attempt to establish a topology for armoured (thyreophoran) dinosaurs within the clade Ornithischia. This topology is derived from Sereno (1986: fig. 3).	2021-01-01	Norman, David B		Zenodo	biologists	Norman, David B			
