taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
B4128A32FF92FFAEBCE9FD24FCAFFBD2.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7035318/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7035318	Figure 2. Lafoea dumosa (Fleming, 1820). A, colonies; B, a polysiphonic hydrocaulus with three polysiphonic hydrocladia; C, magnification of a cauline hydrotheca (arrow); D, two hydrothecae; E, F, two collapsed hydrothecae (arrows); A–D: XMUB6498; E, F: XMUB6468; all from Maxwell Bay, Antarctica. A–F, light microscope images. Scale bars: A = 5 mm; B = 2 mm; C–E = 500 µm; F = 100 µm.	Figure 2. Lafoea dumosa (Fleming, 1820). A, colonies; B, a polysiphonic hydrocaulus with three polysiphonic hydrocladia; C, magnification of a cauline hydrotheca (arrow); D, two hydrothecae; E, F, two collapsed hydrothecae (arrows); A–D: XMUB6498; E, F: XMUB6468; all from Maxwell Bay, Antarctica. A–F, light microscope images. Scale bars: A = 5 mm; B = 2 mm; C–E = 500 µm; F = 100 µm.	2022-06-17	Gu, Zhangjie;Ruthensteiner, Bernhard;Moura, Carlos J.;Liu, Lihua;Zhang, Rui;Song, Xikun		Zenodo	biologists	Gu, Zhangjie;Ruthensteiner, Bernhard;Moura, Carlos J.;Liu, Lihua;Zhang, Rui;Song, Xikun			
B4128A32FF9DFFA1BFADF976FBD5FC5D.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7035384/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7035384	Figure 21. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic analyses with concatenated partial sequences of the 16S, 18S and 28S rRNA genes (5446 bp after multiple alignments) using the GTR+I+G model. Numbers near the nodes indicate bootstrap and Bayesian posterior probability values. Values lower than 50 or 0.5 were omitted and labelled with ‘<’. The scale bar represents 0.1 substitutions per site. Bayesian analyses using the GTR+I+G model. Sequences of species in bold were contributed by this study. ‘+’ (or ‘-’) indicates the families, or superfamily, use (or not) of opercular flaps or nematothecae as the protective strategies.	Figure 21. Maximum likelihood phylogenetic analyses with concatenated partial sequences of the 16S, 18S and 28S rRNA genes (5446 bp after multiple alignments) using the GTR+I+G model. Numbers near the nodes indicate bootstrap and Bayesian posterior probability values. Values lower than 50 or 0.5 were omitted and labelled with ‘<’. The scale bar represents 0.1 substitutions per site. Bayesian analyses using the GTR+I+G model. Sequences of species in bold were contributed by this study. ‘+’ (or ‘-’) indicates the families, or superfamily, use (or not) of opercular flaps or nematothecae as the protective strategies.	2022-06-17	Gu, Zhangjie;Ruthensteiner, Bernhard;Moura, Carlos J.;Liu, Lihua;Zhang, Rui;Song, Xikun		Zenodo	biologists	Gu, Zhangjie;Ruthensteiner, Bernhard;Moura, Carlos J.;Liu, Lihua;Zhang, Rui;Song, Xikun			
B4128A32FF9DFFA1BFADF976FBD5FC5D.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7035388/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7035388	Figure 22. Phylogenetic analyses derived from partial sequences of the 16S rRNA gene (548 bp after multiple alignments). A, B, maximum likelihood analyses using the TIM2+I+G model; C, Bayesian analyses using the GTR+I+G model. A, with phylogram topology, the scale bar represents 0.2 substitutions per site; B, C, with transform cladogram topology. Numbers near the nodes indicate bootstrap or Bayesian posterior probability values, values lower than 50 or 0.5 were omitted; numbers alongside the taxa names indicate the last four digits of the GenBank accession numbers. Different topologies between different phylogenetic analyses in B and C are shown in colour. Sequences of taxa in bold are contributed by this study.	Figure 22. Phylogenetic analyses derived from partial sequences of the 16S rRNA gene (548 bp after multiple alignments). A, B, maximum likelihood analyses using the TIM2+I+G model; C, Bayesian analyses using the GTR+I+G model. A, with phylogram topology, the scale bar represents 0.2 substitutions per site; B, C, with transform cladogram topology. Numbers near the nodes indicate bootstrap or Bayesian posterior probability values, values lower than 50 or 0.5 were omitted; numbers alongside the taxa names indicate the last four digits of the GenBank accession numbers. Different topologies between different phylogenetic analyses in B and C are shown in colour. Sequences of taxa in bold are contributed by this study.	2022-06-17	Gu, Zhangjie;Ruthensteiner, Bernhard;Moura, Carlos J.;Liu, Lihua;Zhang, Rui;Song, Xikun		Zenodo	biologists	Gu, Zhangjie;Ruthensteiner, Bernhard;Moura, Carlos J.;Liu, Lihua;Zhang, Rui;Song, Xikun			
B4128A32FF9DFFA1BC38FBF6FAEDF93B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7035320/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7035320	Figure 3. Type material of Zygophylax abyssicola (Stechow, 1926). A, B, colonies with dichotomous branching patterns, the arrow in A indicates the lectotype; C, a polysiphonic hydrocaulus; D, three successive nodes (arrows) on a hydrocladium, each internode bearing a hydrotheca; E, an axillary hydrotheca; F, a hydrotheca with diaphragm and renovations, and a nematotheca (arrow) near the hydrotheca; G, a coppinia; H, an isolated gonotheca, whose apex bears two apertures; I, a gonotheca with dichotomously branched defensive tubes. From samples: ZSM 20040197, paralectotype [A (left colony), G]; ZSM 20040197, lectotype [A (middle colony)]; ZSM 20040726, paralectotype [A (right colony), D]; ZSM 20043538, paralectotype (B, E); ZSM 20043539, paralectotype (C, F); ZSM 20043542, paralectotype (H, I). A–I, Indian Ocean. A–I, light microscope images. Scale bars: A = 1 cm; B = 0.5 cm; C, D, G, I = 1 mm; E = 0.5 mm; F, H = 200 µm.	Figure 3. Type material of Zygophylax abyssicola (Stechow, 1926). A, B, colonies with dichotomous branching patterns, the arrow in A indicates the lectotype; C, a polysiphonic hydrocaulus; D, three successive nodes (arrows) on a hydrocladium, each internode bearing a hydrotheca; E, an axillary hydrotheca; F, a hydrotheca with diaphragm and renovations, and a nematotheca (arrow) near the hydrotheca; G, a coppinia; H, an isolated gonotheca, whose apex bears two apertures; I, a gonotheca with dichotomously branched defensive tubes. From samples: ZSM 20040197, paralectotype [A (left colony), G]; ZSM 20040197, lectotype [A (middle colony)]; ZSM 20040726, paralectotype [A (right colony), D]; ZSM 20043538, paralectotype (B, E); ZSM 20043539, paralectotype (C, F); ZSM 20043542, paralectotype (H, I). A–I, Indian Ocean. A–I, light microscope images. Scale bars: A = 1 cm; B = 0.5 cm; C, D, G, I = 1 mm; E = 0.5 mm; F, H = 200 µm.	2022-06-17	Gu, Zhangjie;Ruthensteiner, Bernhard;Moura, Carlos J.;Liu, Lihua;Zhang, Rui;Song, Xikun		Zenodo	biologists	Gu, Zhangjie;Ruthensteiner, Bernhard;Moura, Carlos J.;Liu, Lihua;Zhang, Rui;Song, Xikun			
B4128A32FF9DFFA1BC38FBF6FAEDF93B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7035324/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7035324	Figure 4. Line drawings of Zygophylax abyssicola (Stechow, 1926). A, three successive nodes on a hydrocladium, each internode bearing a hydrotheca; B, an axillary hydrotheca; C, a hydrotheca, showing its diaphragm and renovations, and a nematotheca; D, an isolated gonotheca, whose apex bears two apertures; E, a gonotheca with dichotomously branched defensive tubes. Scale bars: A = 1 mm; B–D = 500 µm; E = 500 µm.	Figure 4. Line drawings of Zygophylax abyssicola (Stechow, 1926). A, three successive nodes on a hydrocladium, each internode bearing a hydrotheca; B, an axillary hydrotheca; C, a hydrotheca, showing its diaphragm and renovations, and a nematotheca; D, an isolated gonotheca, whose apex bears two apertures; E, a gonotheca with dichotomously branched defensive tubes. Scale bars: A = 1 mm; B–D = 500 µm; E = 500 µm.	2022-06-17	Gu, Zhangjie;Ruthensteiner, Bernhard;Moura, Carlos J.;Liu, Lihua;Zhang, Rui;Song, Xikun		Zenodo	biologists	Gu, Zhangjie;Ruthensteiner, Bernhard;Moura, Carlos J.;Liu, Lihua;Zhang, Rui;Song, Xikun			
B4128A32FF9DFFA1BC38FBF6FAEDF93B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7035331/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7035331	Figure 5. Type materials (all paralectotypes) of five Zygophylax species deposited in the Zoologische Staatssammlung München.A–F,Z. abyssicola (Stechow, 1926), ZSM 20043537–ZSM 20043542; G, H, Z. africana Stechow, 1923, ZSM 20041574, ZSM 20043579; I–M, Z. curvitheca Stechow, 1913, ZSM 20043570–ZSM 20043574; N–Q, Z. pacifica Stechow, 1920, ZSM 20041554–ZSM 20041556, ZSM 20043569; R–U, Z. valdiviae Stechow, 1923, ZSM 20041566–ZSM 20041569. Scale bars: A–U = 2 cm.	Figure 5. Type materials (all paralectotypes) of five Zygophylax species deposited in the Zoologische Staatssammlung München.A–F,Z. abyssicola (Stechow, 1926), ZSM 20043537–ZSM 20043542; G, H, Z. africana Stechow, 1923, ZSM 20041574, ZSM 20043579; I–M, Z. curvitheca Stechow, 1913, ZSM 20043570–ZSM 20043574; N–Q, Z. pacifica Stechow, 1920, ZSM 20041554–ZSM 20041556, ZSM 20043569; R–U, Z. valdiviae Stechow, 1923, ZSM 20041566–ZSM 20041569. Scale bars: A–U = 2 cm.	2022-06-17	Gu, Zhangjie;Ruthensteiner, Bernhard;Moura, Carlos J.;Liu, Lihua;Zhang, Rui;Song, Xikun		Zenodo	biologists	Gu, Zhangjie;Ruthensteiner, Bernhard;Moura, Carlos J.;Liu, Lihua;Zhang, Rui;Song, Xikun			
B4128A32FF9FFFA2BFB5F937FB16FE6F.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7035331/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7035331	Figure 5. Type materials (all paralectotypes) of five Zygophylax species deposited in the Zoologische Staatssammlung München.A–F,Z. abyssicola (Stechow, 1926), ZSM 20043537–ZSM 20043542; G, H, Z. africana Stechow, 1923, ZSM 20041574, ZSM 20043579; I–M, Z. curvitheca Stechow, 1913, ZSM 20043570–ZSM 20043574; N–Q, Z. pacifica Stechow, 1920, ZSM 20041554–ZSM 20041556, ZSM 20043569; R–U, Z. valdiviae Stechow, 1923, ZSM 20041566–ZSM 20041569. Scale bars: A–U = 2 cm.	Figure 5. Type materials (all paralectotypes) of five Zygophylax species deposited in the Zoologische Staatssammlung München.A–F,Z. abyssicola (Stechow, 1926), ZSM 20043537–ZSM 20043542; G, H, Z. africana Stechow, 1923, ZSM 20041574, ZSM 20043579; I–M, Z. curvitheca Stechow, 1913, ZSM 20043570–ZSM 20043574; N–Q, Z. pacifica Stechow, 1920, ZSM 20041554–ZSM 20041556, ZSM 20043569; R–U, Z. valdiviae Stechow, 1923, ZSM 20041566–ZSM 20041569. Scale bars: A–U = 2 cm.	2022-06-17	Gu, Zhangjie;Ruthensteiner, Bernhard;Moura, Carlos J.;Liu, Lihua;Zhang, Rui;Song, Xikun		Zenodo	biologists	Gu, Zhangjie;Ruthensteiner, Bernhard;Moura, Carlos J.;Liu, Lihua;Zhang, Rui;Song, Xikun			
B4128A32FF9FFFA2BFB5F937FB16FE6F.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7035333/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7035333	Figure 6. Type material of Zygophylax africana Stechow, 1923. A, various colonies; B, portion of polysiphonic hydrocaulus with four monosiphonic hydrocladia, the left and the right arrows indicate an axillary hydrotheca and a nematotheca, respectively; C, hydrothecal diaphragm (lower arrow) and renovations (upper arrow); D, magnification of the nematotheca in B, the arrow indicates a diaphragm within the nematotheca. From samples: A, ZSM 20040731, the arrow indicates the lectotype, other colonies are parelectotypes; B–D, ZSM 20041574, paralectotype. A–D, near Cape Town, South Africa. A–D, light microscope images. Scale bars: A = 1 cm; B = 1 mm; C, D = 100 µm.	Figure 6. Type material of Zygophylax africana Stechow, 1923. A, various colonies; B, portion of polysiphonic hydrocaulus with four monosiphonic hydrocladia, the left and the right arrows indicate an axillary hydrotheca and a nematotheca, respectively; C, hydrothecal diaphragm (lower arrow) and renovations (upper arrow); D, magnification of the nematotheca in B, the arrow indicates a diaphragm within the nematotheca. From samples: A, ZSM 20040731, the arrow indicates the lectotype, other colonies are parelectotypes; B–D, ZSM 20041574, paralectotype. A–D, near Cape Town, South Africa. A–D, light microscope images. Scale bars: A = 1 cm; B = 1 mm; C, D = 100 µm.	2022-06-17	Gu, Zhangjie;Ruthensteiner, Bernhard;Moura, Carlos J.;Liu, Lihua;Zhang, Rui;Song, Xikun		Zenodo	biologists	Gu, Zhangjie;Ruthensteiner, Bernhard;Moura, Carlos J.;Liu, Lihua;Zhang, Rui;Song, Xikun			
B4128A32FF9EFFA7BCC0FBEFFE5DFE22.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7035335/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7035335	Figure 7. Zygophylax biarmata Billard, 1905. A, two colonies; B, hydrocaulus with coppinia; C, hydrothecal arrangement along a hydrocladium; D, an axillary hydrotheca (arrow); E, a hydrotheca with diaphragm (left arrow) and basal nematotheca (right arrow); F, magnification of a nematotheca; G, distal part of a hydrotheca showing multiple renovations. From samples: A–G: ZSM 20220294, Gulf of Cadiz. A, B, D, E, light microscope images; C, F, G, SEM images. Scale bars: A, B = 2 mm; C = 200 µm; D = 500 µm; E = 100 µm; F, G = 50 µm.	Figure 7. Zygophylax biarmata Billard, 1905. A, two colonies; B, hydrocaulus with coppinia; C, hydrothecal arrangement along a hydrocladium; D, an axillary hydrotheca (arrow); E, a hydrotheca with diaphragm (left arrow) and basal nematotheca (right arrow); F, magnification of a nematotheca; G, distal part of a hydrotheca showing multiple renovations. From samples: A–G: ZSM 20220294, Gulf of Cadiz. A, B, D, E, light microscope images; C, F, G, SEM images. Scale bars: A, B = 2 mm; C = 200 µm; D = 500 µm; E = 100 µm; F, G = 50 µm.	2022-06-17	Gu, Zhangjie;Ruthensteiner, Bernhard;Moura, Carlos J.;Liu, Lihua;Zhang, Rui;Song, Xikun		Zenodo	biologists	Gu, Zhangjie;Ruthensteiner, Bernhard;Moura, Carlos J.;Liu, Lihua;Zhang, Rui;Song, Xikun			
B4128A32FF9BFFA7BE40FDC1FDA5FC3C.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7035338/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7035338	Figure 8. Zygophylax brownei Billard, 1924.A, three colonies; B, portion of hydrocaulus with coppinia; C, axillary hydrotheca (arrow); D, magnification of the node (left arrow) and the apophysis of hydrocladia (right arrow); E, a gonotheca; F, a gonotheca with three apical apertures (arrows). From samples: A–F: ZSM 20220295, Gulf of Cadiz. A, B, light microscope images; C–F, SEM images. Scale bars: A = 5 mm; B = 1 mm; C, E = 200 µm; D, F = 100 µm.	Figure 8. Zygophylax brownei Billard, 1924.A, three colonies; B, portion of hydrocaulus with coppinia; C, axillary hydrotheca (arrow); D, magnification of the node (left arrow) and the apophysis of hydrocladia (right arrow); E, a gonotheca; F, a gonotheca with three apical apertures (arrows). From samples: A–F: ZSM 20220295, Gulf of Cadiz. A, B, light microscope images; C–F, SEM images. Scale bars: A = 5 mm; B = 1 mm; C, E = 200 µm; D, F = 100 µm.	2022-06-17	Gu, Zhangjie;Ruthensteiner, Bernhard;Moura, Carlos J.;Liu, Lihua;Zhang, Rui;Song, Xikun		Zenodo	biologists	Gu, Zhangjie;Ruthensteiner, Bernhard;Moura, Carlos J.;Liu, Lihua;Zhang, Rui;Song, Xikun			
B4128A32FF9AFFA6BF93FEF0FD88FC99.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7035331/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7035331	Figure 5. Type materials (all paralectotypes) of five Zygophylax species deposited in the Zoologische Staatssammlung München.A–F,Z. abyssicola (Stechow, 1926), ZSM 20043537–ZSM 20043542; G, H, Z. africana Stechow, 1923, ZSM 20041574, ZSM 20043579; I–M, Z. curvitheca Stechow, 1913, ZSM 20043570–ZSM 20043574; N–Q, Z. pacifica Stechow, 1920, ZSM 20041554–ZSM 20041556, ZSM 20043569; R–U, Z. valdiviae Stechow, 1923, ZSM 20041566–ZSM 20041569. Scale bars: A–U = 2 cm.	Figure 5. Type materials (all paralectotypes) of five Zygophylax species deposited in the Zoologische Staatssammlung München.A–F,Z. abyssicola (Stechow, 1926), ZSM 20043537–ZSM 20043542; G, H, Z. africana Stechow, 1923, ZSM 20041574, ZSM 20043579; I–M, Z. curvitheca Stechow, 1913, ZSM 20043570–ZSM 20043574; N–Q, Z. pacifica Stechow, 1920, ZSM 20041554–ZSM 20041556, ZSM 20043569; R–U, Z. valdiviae Stechow, 1923, ZSM 20041566–ZSM 20041569. Scale bars: A–U = 2 cm.	2022-06-17	Gu, Zhangjie;Ruthensteiner, Bernhard;Moura, Carlos J.;Liu, Lihua;Zhang, Rui;Song, Xikun		Zenodo	biologists	Gu, Zhangjie;Ruthensteiner, Bernhard;Moura, Carlos J.;Liu, Lihua;Zhang, Rui;Song, Xikun			
B4128A32FF9AFFA6BF93FEF0FD88FC99.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7035344/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7035344	Figure 9. Type material of Zygophylax curvitheca Stechow, 1913. A, a colony; B, portion of a polysiphonic hydrocaulus with several basally polysiphonic hydrocladia, the arrows indicate two axillary hydrothecae; C, an incipient coppinia (with only defensive tubes but no gonothecae) on hydrocladium; D, a hydrotheca showing marginal renovations (upper arrow), diaphragm (middle arrow) and basal nematotheca (lower arrow); E, two hydrothecae and nematothecae (arrows) on a hydrocladium; F, magnification of the nematothecae in E.From samples: A–C: ZSM 20040199, lectotype; D: ZSM 20043572, paralectotype; E, F: ZSM 20043573, paralectotype. A–F, Sagami Bay, Japan. A–F, light microscope images. Scale bars: A = 1 cm; B, C = 2 mm; D, E = 500 µm; F = 250 µm.	Figure 9. Type material of Zygophylax curvitheca Stechow, 1913. A, a colony; B, portion of a polysiphonic hydrocaulus with several basally polysiphonic hydrocladia, the arrows indicate two axillary hydrothecae; C, an incipient coppinia (with only defensive tubes but no gonothecae) on hydrocladium; D, a hydrotheca showing marginal renovations (upper arrow), diaphragm (middle arrow) and basal nematotheca (lower arrow); E, two hydrothecae and nematothecae (arrows) on a hydrocladium; F, magnification of the nematothecae in E.From samples: A–C: ZSM 20040199, lectotype; D: ZSM 20043572, paralectotype; E, F: ZSM 20043573, paralectotype. A–F, Sagami Bay, Japan. A–F, light microscope images. Scale bars: A = 1 cm; B, C = 2 mm; D, E = 500 µm; F = 250 µm.	2022-06-17	Gu, Zhangjie;Ruthensteiner, Bernhard;Moura, Carlos J.;Liu, Lihua;Zhang, Rui;Song, Xikun		Zenodo	biologists	Gu, Zhangjie;Ruthensteiner, Bernhard;Moura, Carlos J.;Liu, Lihua;Zhang, Rui;Song, Xikun			
B4128A32FF85FFB9BF81FE7EFDA4FCCC.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7035349/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7035349	Figure 10. Zygophylax leloupi Ramil & Vervoort, 1992. A, fragmentary colony; B, a nematotheca (arrow) on an accessory tube of hydrocaulus; C, hydrothecal arrangement along a hydrocladium; D, annulations of the hydrothecal pedicel (upper arrow) and a node on a hydrocladium (lower arrow); E, axillary hydrotheca; F, a hydrotheca, showing its diaphragm (arrow); G, hydrothecal renovations. From samples: A–G: ZSM 20220296, Lisbon, Portugal. A, C–F, light microscope images; B, G, SEM images. Scale bars: A = 5 mm; B, G = 100 µm; C = 2 mm; D–F = 500 µm.	Figure 10. Zygophylax leloupi Ramil & Vervoort, 1992. A, fragmentary colony; B, a nematotheca (arrow) on an accessory tube of hydrocaulus; C, hydrothecal arrangement along a hydrocladium; D, annulations of the hydrothecal pedicel (upper arrow) and a node on a hydrocladium (lower arrow); E, axillary hydrotheca; F, a hydrotheca, showing its diaphragm (arrow); G, hydrothecal renovations. From samples: A–G: ZSM 20220296, Lisbon, Portugal. A, C–F, light microscope images; B, G, SEM images. Scale bars: A = 5 mm; B, G = 100 µm; C = 2 mm; D–F = 500 µm.	2022-06-17	Gu, Zhangjie;Ruthensteiner, Bernhard;Moura, Carlos J.;Liu, Lihua;Zhang, Rui;Song, Xikun		Zenodo	biologists	Gu, Zhangjie;Ruthensteiner, Bernhard;Moura, Carlos J.;Liu, Lihua;Zhang, Rui;Song, Xikun			
B4128A32FF85FFB9BF8AF993FBDBFA59.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7035352/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7035352	Figure 11. Zygophylax levinseni (Saemundsson, 1911). A, three colonies; B, hydrothecal arrangement along a hydrocladium; C, a coppinia; D, two hydrothecal diaphragms (arrows); E, axillary hydrotheca and a node (arrow); F, two hydrothecae and two clearly identifiable nematothecae (arrows); G, a gonotheca and one nematotheca on an accessory tube (arrow); H, magnification of nematothecae on apophysis of hydrocladia (in F, lower arrow); I, magnification of nematothecae on the accessory tubes (in G). From samples: A–I: ZSM 20220297, Gulf of Cadiz. A–D, light microscope images; E–I, SEM images. Scale bars: A = 1 cm; B, C = 1 mm; D–G = 200 µm; H, I = 50 µm.	Figure 11. Zygophylax levinseni (Saemundsson, 1911). A, three colonies; B, hydrothecal arrangement along a hydrocladium; C, a coppinia; D, two hydrothecal diaphragms (arrows); E, axillary hydrotheca and a node (arrow); F, two hydrothecae and two clearly identifiable nematothecae (arrows); G, a gonotheca and one nematotheca on an accessory tube (arrow); H, magnification of nematothecae on apophysis of hydrocladia (in F, lower arrow); I, magnification of nematothecae on the accessory tubes (in G). From samples: A–I: ZSM 20220297, Gulf of Cadiz. A–D, light microscope images; E–I, SEM images. Scale bars: A = 1 cm; B, C = 1 mm; D–G = 200 µm; H, I = 50 µm.	2022-06-17	Gu, Zhangjie;Ruthensteiner, Bernhard;Moura, Carlos J.;Liu, Lihua;Zhang, Rui;Song, Xikun		Zenodo	biologists	Gu, Zhangjie;Ruthensteiner, Bernhard;Moura, Carlos J.;Liu, Lihua;Zhang, Rui;Song, Xikun			
B4128A32FF85FFBBBC38FA32FEEEF89B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7035354/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7035354	Figure 12. Type material of Zygophylax lighti sp. nov.A, a colony; B, hydrothecal arrangement; C, two axillary hydrothecae and four gonothecae; D, magnification of an axillary hydrotheca; E, magnification of nematothecae (arrow); F, I, hydrotheca, the arrow in I indicates a nematotheca; G, J, magnification of the indentation (arrows); H, magnification of an oblique hydrothecal diaphragm (arrow); K–M, gonothecae; N, gonotheca with dichotomous defensive tubes; O, magnification of a node (arrow) on the defensive tubes. A–O: XMUB7904, holotype, South China Sea. A–H, K, L, light microscope images; I, J, M–O, SEM images. Scale bars:A = 5 mm; B, C = 1 mm, D, F, I, M, N = 200 µm; E, G, H = 100 µm; J, O = 50 µm; K, L = 500 µm.	Figure 12. Type material of Zygophylax lighti sp. nov.A, a colony; B, hydrothecal arrangement; C, two axillary hydrothecae and four gonothecae; D, magnification of an axillary hydrotheca; E, magnification of nematothecae (arrow); F, I, hydrotheca, the arrow in I indicates a nematotheca; G, J, magnification of the indentation (arrows); H, magnification of an oblique hydrothecal diaphragm (arrow); K–M, gonothecae; N, gonotheca with dichotomous defensive tubes; O, magnification of a node (arrow) on the defensive tubes. A–O: XMUB7904, holotype, South China Sea. A–H, K, L, light microscope images; I, J, M–O, SEM images. Scale bars:A = 5 mm; B, C = 1 mm, D, F, I, M, N = 200 µm; E, G, H = 100 µm; J, O = 50 µm; K, L = 500 µm.	2022-06-17	Gu, Zhangjie;Ruthensteiner, Bernhard;Moura, Carlos J.;Liu, Lihua;Zhang, Rui;Song, Xikun		Zenodo	biologists	Gu, Zhangjie;Ruthensteiner, Bernhard;Moura, Carlos J.;Liu, Lihua;Zhang, Rui;Song, Xikun			
B4128A32FF85FFBBBC38FA32FEEEF89B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7035358/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7035358	Figure 13. Hydrothecal arrangement and gonothecae of three new species. A, B, Zygophylax lighti sp. nov.; C, D, Z. pseudosibogae sp. nov.; E, F, Z. tankahkeei sp. nov. A, C, E, hydrothecal arrangement, the bases of hydrothecal pedicels are unilateral arranged, and the distal hydrothecal ends alternately turn left and right, respectively; B, D, F, gonothecae (with defensive tubes). Scale bars: A–F = 500 µm.	Figure 13. Hydrothecal arrangement and gonothecae of three new species. A, B, Zygophylax lighti sp. nov.; C, D, Z. pseudosibogae sp. nov.; E, F, Z. tankahkeei sp. nov. A, C, E, hydrothecal arrangement, the bases of hydrothecal pedicels are unilateral arranged, and the distal hydrothecal ends alternately turn left and right, respectively; B, D, F, gonothecae (with defensive tubes). Scale bars: A–F = 500 µm.	2022-06-17	Gu, Zhangjie;Ruthensteiner, Bernhard;Moura, Carlos J.;Liu, Lihua;Zhang, Rui;Song, Xikun		Zenodo	biologists	Gu, Zhangjie;Ruthensteiner, Bernhard;Moura, Carlos J.;Liu, Lihua;Zhang, Rui;Song, Xikun			
B4128A32FF85FFBBBC38FA32FEEEF89B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7035360/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7035360	Figure 14. Morphological comparisons of selected zygophylacids with curved hydrothecae. A, Zygophylax lighti sp. nov.; B, Z. tankahkeei sp. nov.; C, Z. pseudosibogae sp. nov.; D, E, Z. sibogae Billard, 1918; F, Z. unilateralis Totton, 1930; G, Z. convallaria (Allman, 1877); H, Z. infundibulum Millard, 1958; I, Z. concinna (Ritchie, 1911); J, Z. reflexa (Fraser, 1948); K, Z. adhaerens (Fraser, 1938), hydrothecal basal portion is adherent on the hydrocladium; L, Z. tizardensis Kirkpatrick, 1890; M, Z. kakaiba Campos, Marques, Puce & Pérez, 2016; N, Z. curvitheca Stechow, 1913; O, Cryptolaria prima Busk, 1858, the hydrotheca is almost completely immersed in the hydrocladium. A, XMUB7904, holotype; B, XMUB6200-1, holotype; C, ZSM 20220300, holotype; N, ZSM 20043572, paralectotype. The following images were redrawn from the related original descriptions: D, Schuchert (2003); E, Billard (1918); F, Totton (1930); G, Allman (1877); H, Millard (1958); I, Ritchie (1911); J, Fraser (1948); K, Fraser (1938); L, Kirkpatrick (1890), Hirohito (1995); M, Campos et al. (2016); O, Busk (1858), Ralph (1958). All arrows indicate hydrothecal indentations. Scale bars: A–D, F–I, L–O = 500 µm; E, J, K, unknown.	Figure 14. Morphological comparisons of selected zygophylacids with curved hydrothecae. A, Zygophylax lighti sp. nov.; B, Z. tankahkeei sp. nov.; C, Z. pseudosibogae sp. nov.; D, E, Z. sibogae Billard, 1918; F, Z. unilateralis Totton, 1930; G, Z. convallaria (Allman, 1877); H, Z. infundibulum Millard, 1958; I, Z. concinna (Ritchie, 1911); J, Z. reflexa (Fraser, 1948); K, Z. adhaerens (Fraser, 1938), hydrothecal basal portion is adherent on the hydrocladium; L, Z. tizardensis Kirkpatrick, 1890; M, Z. kakaiba Campos, Marques, Puce & Pérez, 2016; N, Z. curvitheca Stechow, 1913; O, Cryptolaria prima Busk, 1858, the hydrotheca is almost completely immersed in the hydrocladium. A, XMUB7904, holotype; B, XMUB6200-1, holotype; C, ZSM 20220300, holotype; N, ZSM 20043572, paralectotype. The following images were redrawn from the related original descriptions: D, Schuchert (2003); E, Billard (1918); F, Totton (1930); G, Allman (1877); H, Millard (1958); I, Ritchie (1911); J, Fraser (1948); K, Fraser (1938); L, Kirkpatrick (1890), Hirohito (1995); M, Campos et al. (2016); O, Busk (1858), Ralph (1958). All arrows indicate hydrothecal indentations. Scale bars: A–D, F–I, L–O = 500 µm; E, J, K, unknown.	2022-06-17	Gu, Zhangjie;Ruthensteiner, Bernhard;Moura, Carlos J.;Liu, Lihua;Zhang, Rui;Song, Xikun		Zenodo	biologists	Gu, Zhangjie;Ruthensteiner, Bernhard;Moura, Carlos J.;Liu, Lihua;Zhang, Rui;Song, Xikun			
B4128A32FF81FFBCBCD2F959FE9AF9D3.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7035331/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7035331	Figure 5. Type materials (all paralectotypes) of five Zygophylax species deposited in the Zoologische Staatssammlung München.A–F,Z. abyssicola (Stechow, 1926), ZSM 20043537–ZSM 20043542; G, H, Z. africana Stechow, 1923, ZSM 20041574, ZSM 20043579; I–M, Z. curvitheca Stechow, 1913, ZSM 20043570–ZSM 20043574; N–Q, Z. pacifica Stechow, 1920, ZSM 20041554–ZSM 20041556, ZSM 20043569; R–U, Z. valdiviae Stechow, 1923, ZSM 20041566–ZSM 20041569. Scale bars: A–U = 2 cm.	Figure 5. Type materials (all paralectotypes) of five Zygophylax species deposited in the Zoologische Staatssammlung München.A–F,Z. abyssicola (Stechow, 1926), ZSM 20043537–ZSM 20043542; G, H, Z. africana Stechow, 1923, ZSM 20041574, ZSM 20043579; I–M, Z. curvitheca Stechow, 1913, ZSM 20043570–ZSM 20043574; N–Q, Z. pacifica Stechow, 1920, ZSM 20041554–ZSM 20041556, ZSM 20043569; R–U, Z. valdiviae Stechow, 1923, ZSM 20041566–ZSM 20041569. Scale bars: A–U = 2 cm.	2022-06-17	Gu, Zhangjie;Ruthensteiner, Bernhard;Moura, Carlos J.;Liu, Lihua;Zhang, Rui;Song, Xikun		Zenodo	biologists	Gu, Zhangjie;Ruthensteiner, Bernhard;Moura, Carlos J.;Liu, Lihua;Zhang, Rui;Song, Xikun			
B4128A32FF81FFBCBCD2F959FE9AF9D3.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7035362/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7035362	Figure 15. Type material and recent material of Zygophylax pacifica Stechow, 1920. A, G, colonies; B, H, polysiphonic portions of hydrocauli with alternate, monosiphonic hydrocladia; C, I, two axillary hydrothecae; D, E, J, three hydrothecae, showing diaphragms, renovations and basal nematothecae [D and J showing single nematothecae, E and F (magnification) showing a pair of nematothecae]. From samples:A–D:ZSM 20040198; E, F: ZSM 20041556; G–J: XMUB6610.A–D, lectotype; E, F, paralectotype; G–J, materials in this study.A–F, Sagami Bay; G–J, Shimoda, Japan.A–J, light microscope images. Scale bars: A, G = 1 cm; B, H = 2 mm; C, I = 500 µm; D, E, J = 200 µm; F = 50 µm.	Figure 15. Type material and recent material of Zygophylax pacifica Stechow, 1920. A, G, colonies; B, H, polysiphonic portions of hydrocauli with alternate, monosiphonic hydrocladia; C, I, two axillary hydrothecae; D, E, J, three hydrothecae, showing diaphragms, renovations and basal nematothecae [D and J showing single nematothecae, E and F (magnification) showing a pair of nematothecae]. From samples:A–D:ZSM 20040198; E, F: ZSM 20041556; G–J: XMUB6610.A–D, lectotype; E, F, paralectotype; G–J, materials in this study.A–F, Sagami Bay; G–J, Shimoda, Japan.A–J, light microscope images. Scale bars: A, G = 1 cm; B, H = 2 mm; C, I = 500 µm; D, E, J = 200 µm; F = 50 µm.	2022-06-17	Gu, Zhangjie;Ruthensteiner, Bernhard;Moura, Carlos J.;Liu, Lihua;Zhang, Rui;Song, Xikun		Zenodo	biologists	Gu, Zhangjie;Ruthensteiner, Bernhard;Moura, Carlos J.;Liu, Lihua;Zhang, Rui;Song, Xikun			
B4128A32FF8DFFB0BC22F969FE6DFADF.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7035374/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7035374	Figure 18. Zygophylax cf. sagamiensis Hirohito, 1983. A, a colony; B, F, G, images of the same coppinia; C, alternate hydrothecae with one nematotheca (arrow); D, hydrothecae and nematothecae (arrows); E, magnification of a nematotheca; H, two (fused) gonothecae. From samples: A–H: XMUB8109, South China Sea. A–C, light microscope images; D–H, SEM images. Scale bars: A = 5 mm; B = 500 µm; C, D, F = 200 µm; E = 20 µm; G, H = 100 µm.	Figure 18. Zygophylax cf. sagamiensis Hirohito, 1983. A, a colony; B, F, G, images of the same coppinia; C, alternate hydrothecae with one nematotheca (arrow); D, hydrothecae and nematothecae (arrows); E, magnification of a nematotheca; H, two (fused) gonothecae. From samples: A–H: XMUB8109, South China Sea. A–C, light microscope images; D–H, SEM images. Scale bars: A = 5 mm; B = 500 µm; C, D, F = 200 µm; E = 20 µm; G, H = 100 µm.	2022-06-17	Gu, Zhangjie;Ruthensteiner, Bernhard;Moura, Carlos J.;Liu, Lihua;Zhang, Rui;Song, Xikun		Zenodo	biologists	Gu, Zhangjie;Ruthensteiner, Bernhard;Moura, Carlos J.;Liu, Lihua;Zhang, Rui;Song, Xikun			
B4128A32FF8CFFB3BC04F9ECFDCAF8E1.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7035358/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7035358	Figure 13. Hydrothecal arrangement and gonothecae of three new species. A, B, Zygophylax lighti sp. nov.; C, D, Z. pseudosibogae sp. nov.; E, F, Z. tankahkeei sp. nov. A, C, E, hydrothecal arrangement, the bases of hydrothecal pedicels are unilateral arranged, and the distal hydrothecal ends alternately turn left and right, respectively; B, D, F, gonothecae (with defensive tubes). Scale bars: A–F = 500 µm.	Figure 13. Hydrothecal arrangement and gonothecae of three new species. A, B, Zygophylax lighti sp. nov.; C, D, Z. pseudosibogae sp. nov.; E, F, Z. tankahkeei sp. nov. A, C, E, hydrothecal arrangement, the bases of hydrothecal pedicels are unilateral arranged, and the distal hydrothecal ends alternately turn left and right, respectively; B, D, F, gonothecae (with defensive tubes). Scale bars: A–F = 500 µm.	2022-06-17	Gu, Zhangjie;Ruthensteiner, Bernhard;Moura, Carlos J.;Liu, Lihua;Zhang, Rui;Song, Xikun		Zenodo	biologists	Gu, Zhangjie;Ruthensteiner, Bernhard;Moura, Carlos J.;Liu, Lihua;Zhang, Rui;Song, Xikun			
B4128A32FF8CFFB3BC04F9ECFDCAF8E1.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7035360/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7035360	Figure 14. Morphological comparisons of selected zygophylacids with curved hydrothecae. A, Zygophylax lighti sp. nov.; B, Z. tankahkeei sp. nov.; C, Z. pseudosibogae sp. nov.; D, E, Z. sibogae Billard, 1918; F, Z. unilateralis Totton, 1930; G, Z. convallaria (Allman, 1877); H, Z. infundibulum Millard, 1958; I, Z. concinna (Ritchie, 1911); J, Z. reflexa (Fraser, 1948); K, Z. adhaerens (Fraser, 1938), hydrothecal basal portion is adherent on the hydrocladium; L, Z. tizardensis Kirkpatrick, 1890; M, Z. kakaiba Campos, Marques, Puce & Pérez, 2016; N, Z. curvitheca Stechow, 1913; O, Cryptolaria prima Busk, 1858, the hydrotheca is almost completely immersed in the hydrocladium. A, XMUB7904, holotype; B, XMUB6200-1, holotype; C, ZSM 20220300, holotype; N, ZSM 20043572, paralectotype. The following images were redrawn from the related original descriptions: D, Schuchert (2003); E, Billard (1918); F, Totton (1930); G, Allman (1877); H, Millard (1958); I, Ritchie (1911); J, Fraser (1948); K, Fraser (1938); L, Kirkpatrick (1890), Hirohito (1995); M, Campos et al. (2016); O, Busk (1858), Ralph (1958). All arrows indicate hydrothecal indentations. Scale bars: A–D, F–I, L–O = 500 µm; E, J, K, unknown.	Figure 14. Morphological comparisons of selected zygophylacids with curved hydrothecae. A, Zygophylax lighti sp. nov.; B, Z. tankahkeei sp. nov.; C, Z. pseudosibogae sp. nov.; D, E, Z. sibogae Billard, 1918; F, Z. unilateralis Totton, 1930; G, Z. convallaria (Allman, 1877); H, Z. infundibulum Millard, 1958; I, Z. concinna (Ritchie, 1911); J, Z. reflexa (Fraser, 1948); K, Z. adhaerens (Fraser, 1938), hydrothecal basal portion is adherent on the hydrocladium; L, Z. tizardensis Kirkpatrick, 1890; M, Z. kakaiba Campos, Marques, Puce & Pérez, 2016; N, Z. curvitheca Stechow, 1913; O, Cryptolaria prima Busk, 1858, the hydrotheca is almost completely immersed in the hydrocladium. A, XMUB7904, holotype; B, XMUB6200-1, holotype; C, ZSM 20220300, holotype; N, ZSM 20043572, paralectotype. The following images were redrawn from the related original descriptions: D, Schuchert (2003); E, Billard (1918); F, Totton (1930); G, Allman (1877); H, Millard (1958); I, Ritchie (1911); J, Fraser (1948); K, Fraser (1938); L, Kirkpatrick (1890), Hirohito (1995); M, Campos et al. (2016); O, Busk (1858), Ralph (1958). All arrows indicate hydrothecal indentations. Scale bars: A–D, F–I, L–O = 500 µm; E, J, K, unknown.	2022-06-17	Gu, Zhangjie;Ruthensteiner, Bernhard;Moura, Carlos J.;Liu, Lihua;Zhang, Rui;Song, Xikun		Zenodo	biologists	Gu, Zhangjie;Ruthensteiner, Bernhard;Moura, Carlos J.;Liu, Lihua;Zhang, Rui;Song, Xikun			
B4128A32FF8CFFB3BC04F9ECFDCAF8E1.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7035380/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7035380	Figure 19. Type material of Zygophylax tankahkeei sp. nov. A, two colonies, holotype (left), paratype (right); B, portion of the polysiphonic hydrocaulus and a monosiphonic hydrocladium, and an axillary hydrotheca (arrow); C, arrangement of the hydrothecae in two different planes; D, a hydrotheca; E, magnification of a node (upper arrow) and apophysis (lower arrow); F–J, hydrothecal diaphragms (lower arrow in F, arrows in G, H), perisarc projection (upper arrow in F, and arrow in I) and distal renovations (J); K, L, the same nematotheca at different magnifications (arrows); M, coppinia; N, gonothecae (arrow) with repeatedly, dichotomously branched defensive tubes; O, P, isolated gonothecae, the arrows in P indicate three apertures. From samples: A, the left colony, XMUB6200-1, holotype; the right colony, XMUB6200-2, paratype; B–P: XMUB6200-1, holotype.A–P, South China Sea. A–C, F–I, K–M, O, light microscope images; D, E, J, N, P, SEM images. Scale bars:A = 5 mm; B, F, K, N = 500 µm; C, M, O = 1 mm; D, I, P = 200 µm; E, G, H, J, L = 100 µm.	Figure 19. Type material of Zygophylax tankahkeei sp. nov. A, two colonies, holotype (left), paratype (right); B, portion of the polysiphonic hydrocaulus and a monosiphonic hydrocladium, and an axillary hydrotheca (arrow); C, arrangement of the hydrothecae in two different planes; D, a hydrotheca; E, magnification of a node (upper arrow) and apophysis (lower arrow); F–J, hydrothecal diaphragms (lower arrow in F, arrows in G, H), perisarc projection (upper arrow in F, and arrow in I) and distal renovations (J); K, L, the same nematotheca at different magnifications (arrows); M, coppinia; N, gonothecae (arrow) with repeatedly, dichotomously branched defensive tubes; O, P, isolated gonothecae, the arrows in P indicate three apertures. From samples: A, the left colony, XMUB6200-1, holotype; the right colony, XMUB6200-2, paratype; B–P: XMUB6200-1, holotype.A–P, South China Sea. A–C, F–I, K–M, O, light microscope images; D, E, J, N, P, SEM images. Scale bars:A = 5 mm; B, F, K, N = 500 µm; C, M, O = 1 mm; D, I, P = 200 µm; E, G, H, J, L = 100 µm.	2022-06-17	Gu, Zhangjie;Ruthensteiner, Bernhard;Moura, Carlos J.;Liu, Lihua;Zhang, Rui;Song, Xikun		Zenodo	biologists	Gu, Zhangjie;Ruthensteiner, Bernhard;Moura, Carlos J.;Liu, Lihua;Zhang, Rui;Song, Xikun			
B4128A32FF8EFFB5BC38FDD0FD51FECB.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7035331/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7035331	Figure 5. Type materials (all paralectotypes) of five Zygophylax species deposited in the Zoologische Staatssammlung München.A–F,Z. abyssicola (Stechow, 1926), ZSM 20043537–ZSM 20043542; G, H, Z. africana Stechow, 1923, ZSM 20041574, ZSM 20043579; I–M, Z. curvitheca Stechow, 1913, ZSM 20043570–ZSM 20043574; N–Q, Z. pacifica Stechow, 1920, ZSM 20041554–ZSM 20041556, ZSM 20043569; R–U, Z. valdiviae Stechow, 1923, ZSM 20041566–ZSM 20041569. Scale bars: A–U = 2 cm.	Figure 5. Type materials (all paralectotypes) of five Zygophylax species deposited in the Zoologische Staatssammlung München.A–F,Z. abyssicola (Stechow, 1926), ZSM 20043537–ZSM 20043542; G, H, Z. africana Stechow, 1923, ZSM 20041574, ZSM 20043579; I–M, Z. curvitheca Stechow, 1913, ZSM 20043570–ZSM 20043574; N–Q, Z. pacifica Stechow, 1920, ZSM 20041554–ZSM 20041556, ZSM 20043569; R–U, Z. valdiviae Stechow, 1923, ZSM 20041566–ZSM 20041569. Scale bars: A–U = 2 cm.	2022-06-17	Gu, Zhangjie;Ruthensteiner, Bernhard;Moura, Carlos J.;Liu, Lihua;Zhang, Rui;Song, Xikun		Zenodo	biologists	Gu, Zhangjie;Ruthensteiner, Bernhard;Moura, Carlos J.;Liu, Lihua;Zhang, Rui;Song, Xikun			
B4128A32FF8EFFB5BC38FDD0FD51FECB.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/7035382/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7035382	Figure 20. Type material of Zygophylax valdiviae Stechow, 1923. A–C, colonies (in dotted rectangles) growing on Sertularella valdiviae Stechow, 1923; the arrows in C indicate two solitary hydrothecae; D–G, solitary hydrothecae (arrows); H–J, magnification of various hydrothecae, the arrows in J indicate a nematotheca (left arrow) and the straight diaphragm (right arrow). From samples: A: ZSM 20040930, lectotype; B, J: ZSM 20041566, paralectotype; C, E, H, I: ZSM 20041569, paralectotype; D, F, G: ZSM 20041568, paralectotype. A–J, Indian Ocean. A–J, light microscope images. Scale bars: A, D = 2 mm; B, C, E = 1 mm; F, G = 500 µm; H = 100 µm; I, J = 200 µm.	Figure 20. Type material of Zygophylax valdiviae Stechow, 1923. A–C, colonies (in dotted rectangles) growing on Sertularella valdiviae Stechow, 1923; the arrows in C indicate two solitary hydrothecae; D–G, solitary hydrothecae (arrows); H–J, magnification of various hydrothecae, the arrows in J indicate a nematotheca (left arrow) and the straight diaphragm (right arrow). From samples: A: ZSM 20040930, lectotype; B, J: ZSM 20041566, paralectotype; C, E, H, I: ZSM 20041569, paralectotype; D, F, G: ZSM 20041568, paralectotype. A–J, Indian Ocean. A–J, light microscope images. Scale bars: A, D = 2 mm; B, C, E = 1 mm; F, G = 500 µm; H = 100 µm; I, J = 200 µm.	2022-06-17	Gu, Zhangjie;Ruthensteiner, Bernhard;Moura, Carlos J.;Liu, Lihua;Zhang, Rui;Song, Xikun		Zenodo	biologists	Gu, Zhangjie;Ruthensteiner, Bernhard;Moura, Carlos J.;Liu, Lihua;Zhang, Rui;Song, Xikun			
