identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
B9118782FFCDFFB81099ACBEFCD5949F.text	B9118782FFCDFFB81099ACBEFCD5949F.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Achaiabracon aenigmatus Belokobylskij	<div><p>Achaiabracon aenigmatus Belokobylskij</p> <p>Achaiabracon aenigmatus Belokobylskij, 2009a: 80 [original description].</p> <p>Examined material. Greece: 1 female (holotype), “ Creta, Birу ”, “ Canea, 1906” (HNHM); 1 male (paratype), “GR, NE-Corfu, Akr. Ekaterini, 15.5.1995, Martin Schwarz ” (BZLA).</p> <p>Distribution. Greece (Crete and Corfu Islands) (Belokobylskij 2009a).</p> <p>Remarks. This species has the mesosoma highly modified with respect to transformation of its parts and reduction of several furrows as detailed in Belokobylskij (2009a).</p></div> 	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B9118782FFCDFFB81099ACBEFCD5949F	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Belokobylskij, Sergey A.;Kula, Robert R.	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFCDFFB81099AF17FF7B9520.text	B9118782FFCDFFB81099AF17FF7B9520.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Achaiabracon Belokobylskij	<div><p>Genus Achaiabracon Belokobylskij</p> <p>(Figs 108–109)</p> <p>This genus, known from females and males of a single apterous species, was described recently from the Greek Islands (Belokobylskij 2009a). It was separated from other genera in Achaiabraconini on the basis of the following combination of features: eyes long and sparsely setiferous, antennal sockets positioned close to each other, narrow postgenal bridge developed, antennae subclavate, mesosoma with fine postpectal carina, tarsal claws with small basal tooth, fore and mesotibiae with distinct and numerous spines, first metasomal tergum without dorsope, second and third metasomal terga entirely with long and sparse setae, and fourth through sixth terga with two rows of setae.</p></div> 	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B9118782FFCDFFB81099AF17FF7B9520	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Belokobylskij, Sergey A.;Kula, Robert R.	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFCEFFBB1099AEE6FC759436.text	B9118782FFCEFFBB1099AEE6FC759436.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Ecphylus (Sactopus) caudatus Ruschka	<div><p>Ecphylus (Sactopus) caudatus Ruschka</p> <p>Ecphylus caudatus Ruschka in Wichmann, 1916: 25 [original description].</p> <p>Ecphylus (Sactopus) caudatus: Belokobylskij 1993a: 88 [subgeneric placement].</p> <p>Ecphylus hattorii Kôno &amp; Watanabe, 1935: 68 [original description]; Hedqvist 1967: 68 [synonymy]; Belokobylskij 2009b: 89 [status revised as valid].</p> <p>Sycogaster lavagnei Picard &amp; Lichtenstein, 1917: 285 [original description]. Synonymized in Fahringer (1930).</p> <p>Ecphylus lavagnei: Thompson 1953: 115 [revised combination].</p> <p>New material. Tunesia: 3 females, 3 males (macropterous), 1 male (apterous) “Hammamet, Mrezgue, coll. 24.XI.2007 on Ficus, reared 27.XI.2007, E. Nowakowski ” (ZISP)</p> <p>Distribution. Algeria, Austria, Croatia, France, Israel, Italy, Morocco, Romania, Russia (European part) (Yu et al. 2005; Belokobylskij 2009b), and Tunesia (new record).</p> <p>Remarks. Males and females of this species have both macropterous and apterous forms; apterous forms have reduced mesosomal parts and smooth sutures. The distribution of this species is restricted to the West Palearctic, whereas E. hattorii, a former synonym of E. caudatus, occurs in the East Palearctic (Belokobylskij 2009b). Kula (2011: table 1, p. 56) mistakenly listed that E. caudatus occurs in the New World and inadvertently excluded Ecphylus arcuatus Muesebeck (female macropterous, male micropterous).</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B9118782FFCEFFBB1099AEE6FC759436	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Belokobylskij, Sergey A.;Kula, Robert R.	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFCEFFBB1099A960FED797D8.text	B9118782FFCEFFBB1099A960FED797D8.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Ecphylus Foerster	<div><p>Genus Ecphylus Foerster</p> <p>Ecphylus, a genus of 55 described species worldwide, is represented in all zoogeographic regions (Yu et al. 2005) including the Australasian (Belokobylskij et al. 2004). Species occur throughout the Holarctic Region, and some are known from subtropical and tropical areas (Yu et al. 2005; Belokobylskij &amp; Maeto 2009). Belokobylskij (1998, 2009b) recognized two subgenera, while Marsh (2002) considered Sactopus Ashmead a junior synonym of Ecphylus. Five species exhibit microptery or aptery; only one of those species is known from the Palearctic Region (Yu et al. 2005). Species of Ecphylus parasitize mainly beetle larvae of the family Scolytidae (Yu et al. 2005; Belokobylskij &amp; Maeto 2009).</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B9118782FFCEFFBB1099A960FED797D8	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Belokobylskij, Sergey A.;Kula, Robert R.	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFCEFFBB1099AA87FBD5921D.text	B9118782FFCEFFBB1099AA87FBD5921D.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Rhyssalus Haliday	<div><p>Genus Rhyssalus Haliday</p> <p>This genus consists of 10 described species, including two known from fossils only (Yu et al. 2005). It is represented in the Neotropical, Oriental, and Palearctic regions. Species from tropical regions need to be assessed to determine if they belong in Rhyssalus or should be transferred to other genera (see, for example, Belokobylskij &amp; Maeto 2006). One species exhibits brachyptery (female) (Tobias &amp; Belokobylskij 1981).</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B9118782FFCEFFBB1099AA87FBD5921D	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Belokobylskij, Sergey A.;Kula, Robert R.	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFCEFFBB1099ABA1FCA191A2.text	B9118782FFCEFFBB1099ABA1FCA191A2.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Rhyssalus longicaudis (Tobias & Belokobylskij 1981)	<div><p>Rhyssalus longicaudis (Tobias &amp; Belokobylskij)</p> <p>Eurhoptrocentrus longicaudis Tobias &amp; Belokobylskij, 1981: 356 [original description].</p> <p>Rhyssalus longicaudis: Belokobylskij and Tobias 1986: 37 [revised combination].</p> <p>Distribution. Finland, Mongolia, and Russia (Primorsky Territory, Western Siberia, Urals, northwest of European part) (Yu et al. 2005).</p> <p>Remarks. This species, with brachypterous females and macropterous males, is widely distributed but rarely collected in the Palearctic Region (Belokobylskij 1998).</p></div> 	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B9118782FFCEFFBB1099ABA1FCA191A2	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Belokobylskij, Sergey A.;Kula, Robert R.	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFCFFFBA1099AA87FB3192D5.text	B9118782FFCFFFBA1099AA87FB3192D5.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Heterospilus Haliday	<div><p>Genus Heterospilus Haliday</p> <p>Heterospilus, with about 106 described species known collectively from all zoogeographic regions, is one of the most species-rich genera of Doryctinae. Richness is highest in the Neotropics (Yu et al. 2005), and hundreds of species are undescribed (P. Marsh pers. comm.). Only three species of this genus exhibit brachyptery (both sexes): H. belokobylskij, H. hemipterus, and H. vincenti. Only H. hemipterus occurs in the Palearctic Region (Fischer 1960). Jakimavicius (1968) described a brachypterous genus and species from Lithuania that was later placed in Heterospilus (Belokobylskij 1983); we consider it a synonym of H. hemipterus (see below).</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B9118782FFCFFFBA1099AA87FB3192D5	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Belokobylskij, Sergey A.;Kula, Robert R.	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFCFFFB41099ABEEFA919703.text	B9118782FFCFFFB41099ABEEFA919703.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Heterospilus hemipterus (Thomson 1892)	<div><p>Heterospilus hemipterus (Thomson)</p> <p>(Fig. 110)</p> <p>Eurybolus hemipterus Thomson, 1892: 1856 [original description].</p> <p>Synodus hemipterus: Marshall 1897: 104 [revised combination].</p> <p>Dendrosoter hemipterus: Dalla Torre 1898: 231 [revised combination].</p> <p>Caenophanes hemipterus: Kokoujev 1900: 566 [revised combination].</p> <p>Heterospilus hemipterus: Szépligeti 1904: 56 [revised combination]; Fischer 1960: 50 [designation of neotype].</p> <p>Lituania brachyptera Jakimavicius, 1968: 904 [original description]. New synonym.</p> <p>Heterospilus brachypterus: Belokobylskij 1983: 174 [revised combination].</p> <p>Examined material. Bulgaria: 1 female, “ 17.4.1967, Trakija, Pesnopoi Pd., leg. A. Germanov ” (NHMW). France: 1 male, “ France, Corse, Porto Vecchio, 7.90, Boucek” (BMNH); 1 male, “ France, Corse, Ft dom du Fango, 24.6.90, Boucek” (BMNH). Lithuania: 1 female, “ Lithuanian SSR, Rokishskiy r-n, Bagdonishkis, 8.VII.[19] 67 g., Yakimavicius A.” (holotype of Lituania brachyptera Jakimavicius) (ZISP). Mongolia: 1 male, “ Mongolia: Central aimak, 11 km OSO von Somon Bajanzogt, 1600-1700 m,, Exp. Dr. Z. Kaszab, 1968”, “ Nr 1150, 26.VII.1968 ” (HNHM). Slovenia: 1 male (neotype), “Tolmein”, “ Heterospilus hemipterus Thoms., det. Dr. Fahringer, m” (NHMW).</p> <p>Description. Female. Body length 2.50 mm; fore wing length 0.90 mm.</p> <p>Head not depressed, width 1.45 times median length, 1.40 times width of mesoscutum. Head behind eyes (dorsal view) evenly roundly narrowed. Transverse diameter of eye 1.40 – 1.50 times longer than temple (dorsal view). Ocelli small, in almost equilateral triangle. POL 1.60 times Od, 0.35 times OOL. Diameter of antennal socket almost equal to distance between sockets, almost twice distance between socket and eye. Eye with very short and sparse setae, with very shallow emargination opposite antennal socket, 1.20 times as high as broad. Malar space height 0.70 times eye height, 1.30 times basal width of mandible. Face convex, width 1.20 times eye height and 1.35 times height of face and clypeus combined. Malar suture absent. Clypeus with narrow lower flange. Hypoclypeal depression small, oval, width 0.60 times distance from edge of depression to eye, 0.35 times face width. Occipital carina complete dorsally and ventrally, distinctly joining hypostomal carina above base of mandible. Postgenal bridge narrow. Head below eyes (front view) distinctly and almost linearly narrowed. Hypostomal flange narrow.</p> <p>Antennae thick, filiform, with 20 flagellomeres, almost as long as body. Scape short and thick, 1.50 times longer than maximum width, about twice as long as enlarged pedicel. First flagellomere almost straight, subcylindrical, 3.80 times longer than apical width, 1.10 times longer than second flagellomere. Penultimate flagellomere about 2.50 times longer than wide, 0.60 times as long as first flagellomere, 0.90 times as long as apical flagellomere.</p> <p>Mesosoma neither depressed nor reduced in size, length almost twice height. Pronotum elongate, dorsally weakly convex, submedially with distinct pronotal carina; lateral portion with shallow, narrow, weakly curved, and crenulate submedian furrow. Mesoscutum distinctly and gradually roundly elevated above pronotum, maximum width of mesoscutum (dorsal view) 1.40 times median length. Median lobe of mesoscutum weakly protruding forward, convex anteriorly (dorsal view), without median furrow, anterolateral lobes of mesoscutum indistinct and obtuse. Notauli shallow, narrow, complete, crenulate. Prescutellar depression deep, with distinct median carina, smooth but with two fine and incomplete lateral wrinkles, 0.40 times as long as maximum width, 0.40 times as long as scutellum. Scutellum weakly convex, with lateral carinae. Precoxal sulcus deep, oblique, almost straight, densely rugose-crenulate, running along anterior 0.60 of lower part of mesopleuron, but becoming shallow and narrow to middle coxa. Metanotal tooth very short, wide and weakly pointed. Metapleural lobe long, wide, rounded apically. Propodeum (lateral view) evenly and roundly curved from base to apex, without lateral tubercles; propodeal spiracle small.</p> <p>Wings. Size of fore wing strongly reduced, reaching end of first metasomal tergum, 5.10 times longer than maximum width, 0.70 – 1.00 times as long as mesosoma. Pterostigma present, but short or sometimes very short and narrow. Radial vein arising from middle of pterostigma, with three short sections. Radial cell small. Medial, first radiomedial, and recurrent veins present but very strongly desclerotized. Brachial cell open. Nervulus short and almost interstitial. Sometimes venation present up to basal vein only. Hind wing with apical part strongly reduced, 5.70 times longer than wide, 0.90 times as long as fore wing. First abscissa of costal vein as long as distinctly sclerotized second abscissa; second abscissa 1.50 times longer than third abscissa and 0.80 times as long as fourth abscissa. Radial vein strongly desclerotized. Medial cell narrow, length 7.30 times maximum width, 0.40 times length of wing. First abscissa of mediocubital vein 0.90 times as long as second abscissa. Recurrent vein unsclerotized, straight, strongly postfurcal.</p> <p>Legs. Fore tibia with several slender spines in almost single line. Hind coxa with distinct basoventral tubercle, 1.50 times longer than maximum width. Hind femur slender, 4.10 – 4.30 times longer than maximum width. Hind tarsus 0.90 times as long as hind tibia. Basitarsus weakly thickened, without ventral keel, 0.55 times as long as second through fifth tarsomeres combined. Second tarsomere 0.70 times as long as basitarsus, 1.75 times longer than fifth tarsomere (without pretarsus).</p> <p>Metasoma 0.90 times as long as head and mesosoma combined, 2.40 times longer than maximum width. First tergum with high and narrow median area, dorsope distinct, spiracular tubercles present; tergum distinctly and almost linearly widened from base to apex. Maximum width of first tergum 2.00 times minimum width; length 0.80 – 0.90 times apical width, 1.10 times length of propodeum. Median length of second tergum 0.40 times basal width, 0.75 times length of third tergum. Combined length of second and third terga almost equal to basal width of second tergum, about 0.80 times their maximum width. Groove between second and third terga shallow, weakly and regularly curved medially and with fine break in lateral 0.25. Third tergum in basal 0.30 with very shallow, wide, and densely crenulate transverse furrow. Ovipositor sheaths weakly thickened, 0.70 times as long as metasoma, 0.95 times as long as mesosoma, 0.35 times as long as body, equal to fore wing.</p> <p>Sculpture and pubescence. Vertex entirely transversely strigate, sometimes partially strigate-coriaceous; frons entirely weakly transversely costulate. Face finely strigate with small reticulation, almost smooth medially; temple smooth in anterior half and finely vertically strigate in posterior half. Mesoscutum entirely densely granulate, with two distinct wrinkles converging posteriorly in median half. Scutellum densely granulate. Mesopleuron widely densely strigate, with fine granulation posteriorly, almost smooth along posterior margin. Metapleuron entirely and coarsely areolate-rugose. Propodeum with basolateral areas distinctly delineated by carinae, basolateral areas mostly granulate, remainder of propodeum coarsely areolate-rugose. Hind coxa densely transversely strigate in dorsal half, granulate-coriaceous to almost smooth in ventral half. Hind femur finely areolate-rugulose in distal half with fine additional strigulation on outer surface, finely coriaceous to almost smooth in half of inner surface. First tergum densely, distinctly, and almost linearly carinate, without additional rugulosity, dorsal carinae distinct, weakly convex medially and strongly convergent posteriorly. Second tergum densely carinate, almost smooth laterally. Third tergum in anterior 0.40 carinate, rest of tergum smooth. Fourth tergum anteriorly very shortly carinate. Terga posterior to tergum four entirely smooth. Vertex almost entirely with sparse, short, and semi-erect setae. Mesoscutum mostly glabrous, but with sparse, long, and semi-erect setae narrowly along notauli and in single row marginally. Metapleuron setiferous except glabrous area medially. Hind tibia dorsally with long, semi-erect setae; length of those setae 0.70 – 0.90 times maximum width of hind tibia.</p> <p>Color. Head mostly dark reddish brown, around eye and malar space reddish brown to yellowish brown. Mesosoma black, partially dark reddish brown, sometimes prothorax and mesonotum light reddish brown. Metasoma black, but medially reddish brown or light reddish brown. Antenna mostly reddish brown to black, scape, flagellum and two basal flagellomeres yellow to brownish yellow. Palpi yellow. Legs brownish yellow except hind coxa light reddish brown. Ovipositor sheaths mostly black, dark brown basally. Wing hyaline. Pterostigma yellow.</p> <p>Male. Body length 2.40 – 2.70 mm; fore wing length 1.05 mm. Head width 1.50 times median length, 1.35 times width of mesoscutum. Transverse diameter of eye 1.30 – 1.40 times longer than temple (dorsal view). POL 1.40 times Od, 0.30 times OOL. Eye 1.30 times as high as broad. Face width 1.40 times height of eye and 1.40 times height of face and clypeus combined. Hypoclypeal depression width 0.65 times distance from edge of depression to eye, 0.40 times width of face. Mesosoma length 1.80 times height. Mesoscutum weakly elevated above pronotum. Notauli shallow, wide. Scutellum distinctly convex. Wings. Fore wing reaching middle of third metasomal tergum, 4.80 times longer than maximum width, 1.10 times longer than mesosoma. Radial vein arising behind middle of pterostigma, with two short sections. Radial cell small. First radiomedial vein rather distinctly sclerotized. Recurrent vein unsclerotized and antefurcal. Medial vein distinct and straight. Brachial cell open. Nervulus short and postfurcal. Hind wing with large and wide stigmalike enlargement, 0.60 times as long as hind wing. Other veins absent except for distal part of costal vein. Hind femur 3.90 times longer than wide. Hind tarsus as long as hind tibia. Basitarsus 0.45 times as long as second through fifth tarsomeres combined. Metasoma as long as head and mesosoma combined, 2.10 times longer than maximum width. Maximum width of first tergum 2.50 times minimum width. Median length of second tergum 0.55 – 0.65 times basal width, 0.90 times length of third tergum. Groove between second and third terga without lateral breaks. Third tergum in basal 0.30 with deep and very wide densely crenulate transverse furrow.</p> <p>Sculpture. Vertex entirely transversely strigate, mostly with additional very fine granulation. Temple mostly smooth, partly finely rugulose-strigate in posterior 0.30. Mesoscutum without two wrinkles in medioposterior half. Scutellum widely medially smooth or almost smooth, finely granulate marginally. Propodeum with small, granulate and partly rugose basolateral areas, with long and narrow areola distinctly delineated by carinae, basal carina very short. Hind femur distinctly and densely granulate. First tergum distinctly and rather sparsely carinate and medially with fine additional rugulosity. Third tergum distinctly carinate in basal half. Fourth tergum in basal 0.20 and fifth tergum basally densely carinate. Color. Body mostly reddish brown, prothorax, mesoscutum, scutellum, and most part of second and third terga yellowish brown; sometimes body brownish yellow, partly light reddish brown, propodeum and medioanterior half of first tergum distinctly infuscate. Pterostigma light brown. Hind wing stigmalike enlargement dark brown. Otherwise similar to female.</p> <p>Distribution. Austria, Bulgaria (new record), France (new record), Germany, Lithuania, Mongolia, Serbia, Slovenia, and Sweden (Yu et al. 2005).</p> <p>Remarks. Comparison of the primary types of Eurybolus hemipterus Thomson, 1892 and Lituania brachyptera Jakimavicius, 1968 with the specimens from Bulgaria, France, and Mongolia revealed that all are conspecific. Thus, we consider the latter a synonym of the former. Both sexes of this species exhibit brachyptery.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B9118782FFCFFFB41099ABEEFA919703	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Belokobylskij, Sergey A.;Kula, Robert R.	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFC1FFB41099AEDFFC4D9609.text	B9118782FFC1FFB41099AEDFFC4D9609.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Nipponecphylus Belokobylskij & Konishi	<div><p>Genus Nipponecphylus Belokobylskij &amp; Konishi</p> <p>This genus is known from females and a single male for a species from Japan (Belokobylskij &amp; Konishi 2001; Belokobylskij &amp; Maeto 2009) and females only for a species from Australia (Belokobylskij et al. 2004). Females are macropterous, and males are apterous (Belokobylskij &amp; Konishi 2001).</p></div> 	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B9118782FFC1FFB41099AEDFFC4D9609	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Belokobylskij, Sergey A.;Kula, Robert R.	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFC1FFB41099AFDAFBF89513.text	B9118782FFC1FFB41099AFDAFBF89513.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Nipponecphylus matsumurai Belokobylskij & Konishi	<div><p>Nipponecphylus matsumurai Belokobylskij &amp; Konishi</p> <p>(Fig. 111)</p> <p>Nipponecphylus matsumurai Belokobylskij &amp; Konishi, 2001: 130 [original description].</p> <p>Distribution. Japan (Belokobylskij &amp; Konishi 2001; Belokobyldskij &amp; Maeto 2009).</p></div> 	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B9118782FFC1FFB41099AFDAFBF89513	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Belokobylskij, Sergey A.;Kula, Robert R.	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFC1FFB41099ACAFFEA2948F.text	B9118782FFC1FFB41099ACAFFEA2948F.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Rhaconotus Ruthe	<div><p>Genus Rhaconotus Ruthe</p> <p>Rhaconotus is represented in all zoogeographic regions; about 110 described species are known mainly from the Oriental and Afrotropical regions. It was not recovered as monophyletic in cladistic analyses based on nuclear 28S rDNA and mitochondrial COI (Zaldivar-Riverón et al. 2008a). Thus, Rhaconotus is in need of revision given the aforementioned analyses and morphological heterogeneity among species in the genus. Wing size is reduced in only two species: Rhaconotus brachypterus (Hesse) from South Africa and Rhaconotus hispanicus Belokobylskij from Europe and North Africa. Neither species has the mesosoma modified substantially (Hesse 1934; Belokobylskij 2001).</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B9118782FFC1FFB41099ACAFFEA2948F	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Belokobylskij, Sergey A.;Kula, Robert R.	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFC2FFB71099AA87FB139126.text	B9118782FFC2FFB71099AA87FB139126.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Rhaconotus hispanicus Belokobylskij	<div><p>Rhaconotus hispanicus Belokobylskij</p> <p>(Fig. 112)</p> <p>Rhaconotus hispanicus Belokobylskij, 2001: 461 [original description].</p> <p>Examined material. Algeria: 1 female, “ Ain-Franin, Oran, 5.XII [19]59, J. Barbier ” (MNHN). France: 1 female, “ Baran, Nice ?”, “Museum Paris, Coll. O. Sichell 1867” (MNHN); 1 female, “312”, “ Brachocich (?) inconnu á Lethierry Hyeres”, “Museum Paris, 1919, Coll. A. De Perrin ” (MNHN). Spain: 1 female (holotype), “ E. Huesca, 10.-12.5.[19]78, Grasland m. Laubblumen, Söderl.[und]” (SSM).</p> <p>Distribution. Algeria (new record), France (new record), and Spain (Belokobylskij 2001).</p> <p>Remarks. This brachypterous species was described from a single specimen (holotype female) collected in northeastern Spain (Huesca). Additional specimens in MNHN from France and Algeria expand the northern and southern limits of this species, which is currently known only from the western Mediterranean.</p></div> 	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B9118782FFC2FFB71099AA87FB139126	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Belokobylskij, Sergey A.;Kula, Robert R.	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFC2FFB71099AE04FE179782.text	B9118782FFC2FFB71099AE04FE179782.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Spathius canariensis Hedqvist	<div><p>Spathius canariensis Hedqvist</p> <p>Spathius canariensis Hedqvist, 1976: 51 [original description].</p> <p>Distribution. Spain (Canary Islands) (Hedqvist 1976).</p> <p>Remarks. This species is endemic to the Canary Islands. It has strongly reduced mesosomal segments, and the ocelli are virtually absent.</p></div> 	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B9118782FFC2FFB71099AE04FE179782	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Belokobylskij, Sergey A.;Kula, Robert R.	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFC2FFB71099AF56FCE595AB.text	B9118782FFC2FFB71099AF56FCE595AB.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Spathius maderi Fahringer	<div><p>Spathius maderi Fahringer</p> <p>(Fig. 113)</p> <p>Spathius pedestris var. maderi Fahringer, 1930: 77 [original description].</p> <p>Spathius maderi Belokobylskij, 2003: 391 [status revised from subspecies to species].</p> <p>Spathius hirtus Hedqvist, (1975) 1976: 52 [original description]. Synonymized in Belokobylskij (2003).</p> <p>Distribution. Albania, Russia (south of the European part), Spain (Yu et al. 2005), and Serbia (Belokobylskij &amp; Zikic 2009).</p> <p>Remarks. This species is widely distributed but infrequently collected and occurs along the southern part of Europe from Spain to the North Caucasus. Yu et al. (2005) listed it as a subspecies of Spathius pedestris Wesmael; we follow Belokobylskij (2003) and recognize it as a species.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B9118782FFC2FFB71099AF56FCE595AB	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Belokobylskij, Sergey A.;Kula, Robert R.	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFC2FFB71099A8BDFB5C90C0.text	B9118782FFC2FFB71099A8BDFB5C90C0.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Spathius Nees	<div><p>Genus Spathius Nees</p> <p>Spathius, the most species-rich genus in Doryctinae, contains about 309 described species (Yu et al. 2005). Only 21 species have been reported from the New World (Deyrup 1979; Marsh 2002; Marsh &amp; Strazanac 2009); about two thirds of the Old World species occur in the Oriental Region. Species are morphologically heterogeneous, but the genus was recovered as monophyletic in Zaldivar-Riverón et al. (2008a). Seven species exhibit wing size reduction (Yu et al. 2005, Austin &amp; Jennings 2009). Three of those (all apterous) are known from the Palearctic Region. All three occur exclusively in the West Palearctic, mainly Europe (Belokobylskij 2003; Yu et al. 2005).</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B9118782FFC2FFB71099A8BDFB5C90C0	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Belokobylskij, Sergey A.;Kula, Robert R.	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFC3FFB61099A98DFB8F97B0.text	B9118782FFC3FFB61099A98DFB8F97B0.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Acrisis apterus Hellen	<div><p>Acrisis apterus Hellén</p> <p>Acrisis apterus Hellén, 1957: 51 [original description]; Tobias 1983: 166 [invalid designation of lectotype].</p> <p>Distribution. Russia (Kola Peninsula) (Hellén 1957).</p> <p>Remarks. Only a single specimen (holotype female) of this species is known (Hellén 1957; Tobias 1983; Koponen &amp; Tobias 1989). Hellén (1957) did not indicate the number of specimens from which he described this species. However, it appears that the original description is based on one female. Therefore, the designation of a lectotype in Tobias (1983) is invalid because the single specimen is the holotype.</p></div> 	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B9118782FFC3FFB61099A98DFB8F97B0	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Belokobylskij, Sergey A.;Kula, Robert R.	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFC3FFB61099A8B2FE3A9036.text	B9118782FFC3FFB61099A8B2FE3A9036.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Acrisis Foerster	<div><p>Genus Acrisis Foerster</p> <p>Acrisis contains nine species in the Holarctic Region, with Acrisis brevicornis Hellén widely distributed in the Palearctic. All but two species occur in Europe (Tobias 1983; Yu et al. 2005), and only one is micropterous (in the female) (Hellén 1957).</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B9118782FFC3FFB61099A8B2FE3A9036	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Belokobylskij, Sergey A.;Kula, Robert R.	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFC3FFB61099AF55FB009503.text	B9118782FFC3FFB61099AF55FB009503.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Chremylus Haliday	<div><p>Genus Chremylus Haliday</p> <p>For many years Chremylus contained only the type species, Chremylus elaphus Haliday, although it has several synonyms (Shenefelt 1975; Yu et al. 2005). Pentatermus striatus (Szépligeti), known from the Oriental and Afrotropical regions, was placed previously in Chremylus (Achterberg 1991; Belokobylskij 2002), as was Rhaconotus concinnus (Enderlein) from Taiwan (Belokobylskij 1994). An additional species exhibiting brachyptery and macroptery, Chremylus pomonellae (Atanasov), comb. n., was described originally in the genus Rhyssalus (Atanasov 1996). Two new brachypterous or micropterous species of Chremylus are described below from southwestern Europe and North Africa, increasing the total number of described species worldwide to four.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B9118782FFC3FFB61099AF55FB009503	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Belokobylskij, Sergey A.;Kula, Robert R.	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFC3FFB61099AA87FD3E92BB.text	B9118782FFC3FFB61099AA87FD3E92BB.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Spathius pedestris Wesmael	<div><p>Spathius pedestris Wesmael</p> <p>(Fig. 114)</p> <p>Spathius pedestris Wesmael, 1838: 132 [original description of species].</p> <p>Spathius apterus Wollaston, 1858: 24 [original description]. Synonymized in Wilkinson (1931).</p> <p>Distribution. Belgium, former Czechoslovakia, Denmark, France, Germany, Hungary, Israel, Italy, Netherlands, Romania, Russia (European part), Slovenia, Spain (including Canary Islands), Switzerland, Ukraine, United Kingdom, and former Yugoslavia (Yu et al. 2005).</p></div> 	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B9118782FFC3FFB61099AA87FD3E92BB	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Belokobylskij, Sergey A.;Kula, Robert R.	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFC3FFB31099ACDFFDB29078.text	B9118782FFC3FFB31099ACDFFDB29078.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Chremylus planispinus Belokobylskij 2012	<div><p>Chremylus planispinus Belokobylskij, sp. n.</p> <p>(Figs 1–10)</p> <p>Type material. Holotype: female, France, “ Garrigues de Montpellier, H. Lavagne ”, “ Coll. F. Picard (Coll. Lichtenstein), Mus Paris 1939” (MNHN). Paratypes: 1 female, same labels as holotype (ZISP); 2 females, “ Coll. F. Picard (Coll. Lichtenstein), Mus Paris 1939” (MNHN); 1 female, Algeria, “Museum Paris, Algerie, Bone, Coll. O. Sichel 1867”, “ Bone, 8.[18]66” [was determined erroneously as Pambolus mirus (Ruthe)] (MNHN); 1 female, Algeria, “Museum Paris, Coll. O. Sichel 1867”, “ Bone, Mars 67” (MNHN).</p> <p>Etymology. From Latin “ planus ” (flat) and “ spina ” (thorn) because flat processes are present on the propodeum of this species.</p> <p>Description. Female. Body length 2.10–2.60 mm.</p> <p>Head (dorsal view) 1.30–1.50 times as wide as median length, 1.60–1.80 times as wide as mesosoma at level of tegulae. Head behind eyes distinctly, regularly, and weakly rounded or almost linearly narrowed. Transverse diameter of eye 2.30–2.80 times longer than temple (dorsal view). Ocelli in equilateral triangle. POL about 1.50 times Od, 0.50–0.60 times OOL. Antennal sockets situated close to each other, diameter of socket 1.50–2.00 times distance between sockets, 0.60–0.80 times distance between socket and eye. Eye glabrous, with very shallow emargination opposite antennal socket, 1.20–1.30 times as high as broad. Malar space 0.45–0.50 times as high as eye, 1.30–1.40 times as high as basal width of mandible. Trace of malar suture present, but mostly absent. Face distinctly convex, width 1.10–1.15 times eye height and 1.40–1.70 times height of face and clypeus combined. Width of hypoclypeal depression 0.75–0.90 times distance from depression to eye, 0.35–0.40 times width of face. Occipital carina complete dorsally, joined ventrally with hypostomal carina above base of mandible. Hypostomal flange wide. Mandible thick. Head below eyes distinctly and weakly roundly narrowed (frontal view). Palpi short, maxillary palpus with 6 palpomeres, labial palpus with 4 palpomeres.</p> <p>Antenna rather slender, filiform, with 16–17 flagellomeres, 0.70–0.80 times as long as body. Scape with excavation in apical and outer margin, 1.70–2.00 times longer than maximum width. First flagellomere 3.00–3.50 times longer than apical width, almost as long as second flagellomere. Penultimate flagellomere 2.00–2.50 times longer than wide, 0.70 times as long as first flagellomere, 0.85–1.00 times as long as apical flagellomere; the latter weakly pointed apically and without spine.</p> <p>Mesosoma more or less reduced in size, length 1.80–1.90 times maximum height. Pronotum rather long, anterior margin weakly convex (dorsal view), pronotal keel distinct and situated submedially. Mesoscutum weakly and roundly elevated above pronotum, 0.70–0.75 times as long as wide. Notauli shallow or very shallow, rather wide, complete, sparsely crenulate. Prescutellar depression relatively deep, long, with three to five wrinkles, finely coriaceous or smooth. Scutellum separated, with distinct lateral carinae. Subalar depression shallow and strigose with granulation. Mesopleuron with shallow oblique submedian furrow. Precoxal suture present, distinct, crenulate, running along anterior 0.70–0.80 of lower part of mesopleuron. Prepectal carina distinct. Postpectal carina absent. Metapleural lower lobe rather long, wide basally and narrow toward apex, rounded apically. Propodeum regularly convex-roundly narrowed posteriorly (lateral view), with distinct, wide, more or less flat, apically subpointed lateral processes in posterior 0.30. In dorsal view, mesonotum 3.00–4.00 times longer than pronotum, 1.40–1.70 times longer than propodeum. Tegulae present.</p> <p>Wings. Size of wings strongly reduced, narrow, rounded apically, with 2 short marginate veins, without sclerotized areas, protruding shortly behind base of propodeum.</p> <p>Legs. Fore tibia without spines. Femora rather slender, without dorsal protuberance. Hind femur weakly curved in basal third, 4.30–4.90 times longer than maximum width. Hind tarsus 0.80–0.90 times as long as hind tibia. Hind tibia weakly widened posteriorly. Hind basitarsus 0.60–0.65 times as long as second through fifth tarsomeres combined. Second tarsomere of hind tarsus 0.50–0.55 times as long as basitarsus, 1.50–1.60 times longer than fifth tarsomere (without pretarsus). Claws weakly curved.</p> <p>Metasoma 1.70–2.00 times longer than maximum width, 1.00–1.20 times longer than head and mesosoma combined. First tergum distinctly widened toward small spiracular tubercles in basal 0.35, then less strongly and weakly roundly widened to apex or entirely more or less regularly widened from subbase to apex; with more or less convex and wide median area, with subparallel and widely separated dorsal carinae; length of tergum 0.85–0.95 times apical width, 1.20–1.40 times length of propodeum; apical width of tergum 2.10–2.40 times minimum basal width. Groove between second and third terga present but very shallow and weakly curved, sometimes almost absent medially. Median length of second tergum 0.70–0.80 times as long as basal width, 1.40–1.50 times length of third tergum. Median length of second and third terga combined 1.20–1.30 times basal width of second tergum, 0.75–0.90 times maximum width. Apical terga usually rather distinctly protruding behind third tergum. Ovipositor straight, rather slender, sheath 0.70–0.80 times as long as hind tibia, 0.40–0.50 times as long as metasoma, 0.60– 0.80 times as long as mesosoma.</p> <p>Sculpture and pubescence. Vertex very densely and distinctly granulate, sometimes additionally finely transversely strigulate; frons densely granulate-rugulose; face almost entirely and distinctly densely granulate; temple entirely distinctly and densely granulate. Mesoscutum finely and densely granulate, sometimes anteriorly with rugosity, posteriorly almost smooth in narrow area. Scutellum distinctly and densely granulate. Mesopleuron finely coriaceous in upper 0.30–0.50, densely and more or less distinctly granulate in lower part, rarely almost entirely granulate. Propodeum almost entirely areolate-rugulose, with sparse transverse strigosity; with distinctly delineated areas; areola long, pentagonal, connected or almost connected anteriorly with base of propodeum, 1.80–2.20 times longer than wide. Hind coxa mostly smooth, rugose-strigate dorsally. Hind femur almost entirely and rather finely granulate. First tergum entirely distinctly and densely carinate, without additional microsculpture. Second tergum shortly or very shortly and sometimes finely carinate mediobasally, smooth on rest part. Terga posterior to second tergum entirely smooth. Vertex entirely with sparse, short and almost recumbent pale setae. Mesonotum with dense, short, semi-erect pale setae spaced widely along notauli and narrowly laterally. Fourth through sixth metasomal terga with single row of rather long semi-erect setae. Hind tibia dorsally with dense, short, and semierect setae, length of those setae 0.30–0.40 times maximum width of hind tibia.</p> <p>Color. Body predominantly brownish yellow, metasoma behind first or second tergum reddish brown. Basal 0.50–0.60 of antenna yellowish brown, rest of antenna rather distinctly infuscate. Palpi yellow. Legs brownish yellow. Ovipositor sheath dark brown.</p> <p>Male. Unknown.</p> <p>Diagnosis. This new species is very similar morphologically to C. elaphus in the following features: shape of hind femur; fine groove usually present between second and third terga; antennal sockets situated much closer to each other than to eye; granulation on head and mesosoma widely spaced; long areola of propodeum; and presence of flat, wide, and obtuse lateral processes. Chremylus planispinus very distinctly differs from C. elaphus in the following features: malar suture present but fine, scape short and with oblique excavation in apico-lateral side, antennae long and with more flagellomeres, antennal flagellomeres long, temple short and distinctly narrowed just behind eyes (dorsal view), mesosoma long and not high, wing size very strongly reduced, and first metasomal tergum long. Chremylus planispinus is also similar morphologically to Chremylus algecirasus Belokobylskij, n. sp., but they differ from one another as detailed below in the diagnosis for C. algecirasus.</p> <p>Distribution. Algeria, France.</p></div> 	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B9118782FFC3FFB31099ACDFFDB29078	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Belokobylskij, Sergey A.;Kula, Robert R.	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFC6FFAF1099A95CFD3E9126.text	B9118782FFC6FFAF1099A95CFD3E9126.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Chremylus pomonellae (Atanasov) Belokobylskij & Kula 2012	<div><p>Chremylus pomonellae (Atanasov), comb. n.</p> <p>(Figs 11–23, 116)</p> <p>Rhysallus pomonellae Atanasov, 1996: 5 [original description].</p> <p>Examined material. Bulgaria: 4 females and 1 male (paratypes; brachypterous), 3 females (paratypes; macropterous) “Bulgaria: Plovdiv Dist., env. of Rogosh village, coll. 5.VI.1990, reared 18-20.VIII.1990, A. Atanasov ”, “Host: Larva of Cydia (Laspeyresia) pomonella (L.) (Tortricidae)” (ZISP).</p> <p>Description of brachypterous form. Female. Body length 2.20–2.30 mm.</p> <p>Head (dorsal view) 1.45–1.55 times as wide as median length, 1.40 times as wide as mesosoma at level of tegulae. Head behind eyes distinctly, regularly, and weakly roundly narrowed. Transverse diameter of eye 2.00–2.30 times longer than temple (dorsal view). Ocelli in triangle with base 1.10–1.30 times sides. POL 1.50–2.00 times Od, 0.70– 0.85 times OOL. Antennal sockets situated close to each other, diameter of socket 1.70–2.00 times distance between sockets, 0.70–1.30 times distance between socket and eye. Eye with very short and sparse setae, without emargination opposite antennal socket, 1.20 times as high as broad. Malar space 0.50–0.55 times as high as eye, 1.20–1.40 times as high as basal width of mandible. Malar suture absent. Face convex, width 1.00–1.10 times eye height and 1.20–1.30 times height of face and clypeus combined. Width of hypoclypeal depression 0.70–0.80 times distance from depression to eye, 0.40–0.45 times width of face. Occipital carina coarse, complete dorsally, joined ventrally with hypostomal carina above base of mandible. Hypostomal flange rather wide. Mandible rather thick. Head below eyes distinctly and roundly narrowed (frontal view). Maxillary palpi long and with 6 palpomeres, labial palpi short and with 4 palpomeres.</p> <p>Antenna rather slender, filiform, with 17 flagellomeres, 0.80 times as long as body. Scape with excavation in apical and outer margin, 1.60–1.80 times longer than maximum width. First flagellomere 3.20–3.50 times longer than apical width, almost as long as second flagellomere. Penultimate flagellomere 2.00–2.30 times longer than wide, 0.55 times as long as first flagellomere, 0.80–0.85 times as long as apical flagellomere; the latter obtuse apically and without spine.</p> <p>Mesosoma weakly reduced in size, length 1.80–2.00 times maximum height. Pronotum rather long, anterior margin almost straight or weakly convex (dorsal view), pronotal keel rather distinct and situated submedially. Mesoscutum weakly and roundly elevated above pronotum, 0.70 times as long as wide. Notauli very shallow, rather narrow, complete, weakly granulate with sparse and fine crenulation. Prescutellar depression relatively deep, short, with four to five wrinkles, finely or very finely granulate. Scutellum separated, with distinct lateral carinae. Subalar depression shallow and densely granulate with crenulation on narrow area. Mesopleuron without oblique submedian furrow. Precoxal suture present, rather distinct, sparsely and distinctly crenulate, running along anterior 0.50–0.60 of lower part of mesopleuron; additional shallow and narrow furrow covered by coarse sublongitudinal or oblique striae situated between end of precoxal suture and middle coxa. Prepectal carina distinct. Postpectal carina at least partly present. Metapleural lower lobe short, wide basally and narrow toward apex, rounded apically. Propodeum regularly convex- roundly narrowed posteriorly (lateral view), with distinct, wide, flat, apically rounded lateral processes in posterior 0.25. In dorsal view, mesonotum about 5.00 times longer than pronotum, 1.40–1.60 times longer than propodeum. Tegulae present.</p> <p>Wings. Size of wings distinctly reduced, narrow, rounded apically, reaching almost middle of metasoma. Medial, submedial, discoidal, and usually brachial cells of fore wing closed. Pterostigma present but small. Radial vein present closing radial cell. Sometimes both radiomedial veins present and small second radiomedial cell delineated by distinct veins. Parallel vein interstitial. Nervulus distinctly antefurcal. In hind wing, medial and submedial cells closed by veins.</p> <p>Legs. Fore tibia without spines. Femora rather slender, without dorsal protuberance. Hind femur weakly curved in basal 0.30, 3.70–4.20 times longer than maximum width. Hind tarsus 0.75–0.85 times as long as hind tibia. Hind tibia weakly widened posteriorly. Hind basitarsus 0.60–0.65 times as long as second through fifth tarsomeres combined. Second tarsomere of hind tarsus 0.45–0.55 times as long as basitarsus, 1.25–1.45 times longer than fifth tarsomere (without pretarsus). Claws weakly curved.</p> <p>Metasoma 1.40–1.50 times longer than maximum width, 0.85–0.90 times as long as head and mesosoma combined. First tergum distinctly widened toward apex, with weakly convex and rather narrow median area, with dorsal carinae not widely separated and weakly convergent posteriorly; length of tergum 0.70–0.80 times apical width, almost equal to length of propodeum; apical width of tergum 2.10–2.30 times basal width. Groove between second and third terga present, but shallow and weakly curved. Median length of second tergum 0.65–0.70 times as long as basal width, 1.80–2.00 times length of third tergum. Median length of second and third terga combined 1.10 times basal width of second tergum, 0.75–0.80 times maximum width. Apical terga rather shortly protruding behind third tergum. Ovipositor straight, rather slender, sheath 0.50–0.70 times as long as hind tibia, 0.40–0.50 times as long as metasoma, 0.50–0.60 times as long as mesosoma.</p> <p>Sculpture and pubescence. Vertex very densely and distinctly granulate, frons densely granulate, with fine or distinct rugulosity at least laterally or entirely; face almost entirely and distinctly densely granulate, partly with fine areolation; temple entirely distinctly and densely granulate. Mesoscutum distinctly and densely granulate, with rugosity medioposteriorly. Scutellum densely granulate. Mesopleuron finely granulate-coriaceous, almost smooth medially. Propodeum almost entirely rugose-strigate, with transverse strigation in posterior half, with fine additional granulation anteriorly; areas distinctly delineated; areola long, narrow, elongate-oval, connected anteriorly with base of propodeum, 2.50–3.30 times longer than wide; petiolate area narrow, long, distinctly separated. Hind coxa in dorsal half at least partly or entirely rugulose or rugose, smooth in lower half. Hind femur entirely and densely granulate, partly or entirely with rugulosity. First tergum entirely distinctly and densely carinate, without additional microsculpture. Second tergum smooth. Terga posterior to second tergum entirely smooth. Vertex entirely with rather dense, short, and semi-erect pale setae. Mesonotum with dense, short, and semi-erect pale setae spaced rather narrowly along notauli and laterally. Fourth through sixth metasomal terga with single row of short semi-erect setae. Hind tibia dorsally with dense, short or very short, and semi-erect setae, length of those setae 0.25–0.30 times as long as maximum width of hind tibia.</p> <p>Color. Body brownish yellow except head slightly darker, metasoma behind first tergum yellowish, but dark brown apically. Basal 0.70 of antenna yellow, rest of antenna yellowish brown or brown. Palpi yellow. Legs brownish yellow. Ovipositor sheath brown, dark brown apically.</p> <p>Male. Body length 1.80 mm. Head (dorsal view) 1.40 times as wide as median length. Transverse diameter of eye 2.00 times longer than temple (dorsal view). Diameter of antennal socket 3.00 times distance between sockets. Malar space 1.10 times as high as basal width of mandible. Width of hypoclypeal depression 0.90 times distance from depression to eye. Head below eyes strongly and convex-roundly narrowed (frontal view). Vertex and frons finely granulate and partly with rugulosity; face narrow medially almost smooth. Basal segment of maxillary palpus very strongly enlarged. Scape 1.50 times longer than wide. Mesosoma length 1.70 times height. Mesoscutum 0.75 times as long as wide. Precoxal suture shallow. Mesoscutum with fine rugosity in narrow medioposterior area. Mesopleuron finely rugulose along margins, widely smooth medially. In dorsal view, mesonotum 4.20 times longer than pronotum, 2.00 times longer than propodeum. Size of wings strongly reduced, reaching end of propodeum, only with medial and submedial cells. Hind femur 3.60 times longer than maximum width. First tergum with indistinct median area, dorsal carinae distinct only basally; length of tergum 0.85 times apical width, 1.20 times length of propodeum. Groove between second and third terga very fine. Median length of second tergum 1.60 times length of third tergum. Median length of second and third terga combined 1.15 times basal width of second tergum, 0.70 times maximum width. Body yellow except metasoma brownish yellow. Otherwise similar to female.</p> <p>Description of macropterous form. Female. Body length 2.30 mm; fore wing length 1.70 mm.</p> <p>Head (dorsal view) 1.40 times as wide as median length, 1.30 times as wide as mesosoma at level of tegulae. POL 0.70 times OOL. Eye with very weak emargination opposite antennal socket.</p> <p>Mesosoma. Mesoscutum 0.80 times as long as wide. In dorsal view, mesonotum 5.50–6.00 times longer than pronotum, 1.80–2.00 times longer than propodeum.</p> <p>Wings. Length of fore wing 3.10–3.20 times maximum width. Radial cell weakly shortened; metacarp almost as long as pterostigma. Pterostigma narrow, 5.00–5.50 times longer than maximum width. Radial vein arising behind middle of pterostigma. First radial abscissa forming obtuse angle with second abscissa, 1.20–1.60 times longer than maximum width of pterostigma. Second radial abscissa 1.50–2.00 times longer than first abscissa, 0.45–0.50 times as long as weakly curved third abscissa, 1.10 times longer than first radiomedial vein. Second radiomedial cell short, weakly narrowed distally, 2.20–2.30 times longer than wide, 1.10 times longer than brachial cell. First medial abscissa very weakly sinuate. Recurrent vein more or less postfurcal. Mediocubital vein not curved to anal vein. Nervulus interstitial to basal vein, sometimes weakly postfurcal. Brachial cell gradually and evenly closed before recurrent vein; posterior abscissa of anal vein (behind brachial vein) present but unsclerotized. Parallel vein interstitial. Hind wing 3.80–4.00 times longer than maximum width. First costal abscissa 0.50–0.60 times as long as second abscissa. First abscissa of mediocubital vein 0.65–0.70 times as long as second abscissa. Recurrent vein present, very strongly desclerotized, weakly curved, weakly antefurcal.</p> <p>Legs. Hind femur 4.40–4.50 times longer than maximum width. Hind tarsus 0.90 times as long as hind tibia.</p> <p>Metasoma 0.80 times as long as head and mesosoma combined. First tergum with wide median area; apical width of tergum 2.50–2.60 times basal width. Median length of second and third terga combined 1.20–1.30 times basal width of second tergum. Apical terga shortly protruding behind third tergum. Ovipositor weakly downcurved, sheath 0.25–0.30 times as long as fore wing.</p> <p>Sculpture and pubescence. Frons entirely densely and more or less distinctly rugose-areolate or rugose-strigate and with fine granulation. Scutellum densely and finely areolate-coriaceous. Mesopleuron finely areolate-coriaceous, almost smooth medially. Propodeum widely rugose-strigate, with transverse strigation in posterior half and with granulation anteriorly; areola 2.00–2.40 times longer than wide.</p> <p>Color. Metasoma dark brown or dark reddish brown in apical 0.30. Basal half of antenna yellow, apical half light brown or light reddish brown. Palpi pale yellow. Hind femur light reddish brown. Ovipositor sheath pale brown, brown or faintly darkened apically.</p> <p>Other characters are as in brachypterous form.</p> <p>Diagnosis. This species, described originally in Rhyssalus (Atanasov 1996), is transferred to Chremylus based on examination of several paratypes (both brachypterous and macropterous forms). Besides the characters listed for brachypterous C. planispinus, the macropterous form has wing venation similar to C. elaphus. Chremylus pomonellae is very similar to C. planispinus but differs as follows: mesosoma dorsally wide, face narrow (1.20–1.30 times height of face and clypeus combined), prescutellar depression with strong and numerous wrinkles, mesopleuron without oblique submedian furrow, postero-lateral propodeal processes short and rounded apically, hind femur wide, first tergum wide apically, second tergum smooth basally, and wing much longer.</p> <p>Distribution. Bulgaria (Atanasov 1996).</p></div> 	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B9118782FFC6FFAF1099A95CFD3E9126	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Belokobylskij, Sergey A.;Kula, Robert R.	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFDAFFA91099A8A5FE1D965D.text	B9118782FFDAFFA91099A8A5FE1D965D.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Chremylus algecirasus Belokobylskij & Kula 2012	<div><p>Chremylus algecirasus Belokobylskij, sp. n.</p> <p>(Figs 24–32, 115)</p> <p>Type material. Holotype: female, Spain, “Süd-Spanien, Algeciras. Simon”, “ Pambolus rosenhaueri Ratz., det. Papp J. 1990” (HNHM).</p> <p>Etymology. From “Algeciras,” type locality of the new species.</p> <p>Description. Female. Body length 2.20 mm.</p> <p>Head (dorsal view) 1.30 times as wide as median length, 1.90 times as wide as mesosoma at level of tegulae. Head behind eyes distinctly, regularly, and weakly roundly narrowed. Transverse diameter of eye 2.50 times longer than temple (dorsal view). Ocelli in almost equilateral triangle. POL about twice Od, 0.80 times OOL. Antennal sockets situated close to each other, diameter of socket 1.80 times distance between sockets, 1.10 times distance between socket and eye. Eye glabrous, without emargination opposite antennal socket, 1.20 times as high as broad. Malar space 0.35 times as high as eye, about 1.50 times as high as basal width of mandible. Malar suture indeterminate. Face distinctly convex, width equal to eye height and 1.70 times height of face and clypeus combined. Width of hypoclypeal depression 0.75 times distance from depression to eye, 0.35 times width of face. Occipital carina complete dorsally, joined ventrally with hypostomal carina above base of mandible. Hypostomal flange wide. Mandible thick. Head below eyes distinctly and almost linearly narrowed (frontal view).</p> <p>Antenna rather slender, filiform, with 17 flagellomeres, 0.80 times as long as body. Scape with excavation in apical and outer margin, 2.00 times longer than wide. First flagellomere 3.70 times longer than apical width, slightly longer than second flagellomere. Penultimate flagellomere 2.50 times longer than wide, 0.70 times as long as first flagellomere, 0.85 times as long as apical flagellomere; the latter weakly pointed apically and without spine.</p> <p>Mesosoma more or less reduced in size, length 1.80 times height. Pronotum rather long, anterior margin weakly convex (dorsal view), pronotal keel distinct and situated submedially. Mesoscutum weakly and roundly elevated above pronotum, 0.80 times as long as wide. Notauli shallow, rather wide, complete, rugulose-crenulate. Prescutellar depression relatively deep, long, with median carina, rather distinctly reticulate-coriaceous. Scutellum separated, with distinct lateral carinae. Subalar depression shallow and rugose-strigate. Mesopleuron with very shallow oblique submedian furrow. Precoxal suture present, distinct, crenulate, running along anterior 0.80 of lower part of mesopleuron. Prepectal carina distinct. Postpectal carina possibly absent [obscured by legs and glue]. Metapleural lower lobe rather long, rather narrow basally, rounded apically. Propodeum (lateral view) regularly convex-roundly narrowed posteriorly, with distinct, rather narrow, subcylindrical, subpointed apically lateral processes in posterior 0.25. In dorsal view, mesonotum 3.50 times longer than pronotum, 1.70 times longer than propodeum. Tegulae present.</p> <p>Wings. Size of wings strongly reduced, narrow, rounded apically, with 2 short marginate veins, without sclerotized areas, protruding shortly behind base of propodeum.</p> <p>Legs. Fore tibia without spines. Femora more or less slender, without dorsal protuberance. Hind femur weakly curved in basal third, 4.30 times longer than maximum width. Hind tarsus 0.90 times as long as hind tibia. Hind tibia weakly widened posteriorly. Hind basitarsus 0.60 times as long as second through fifth tarsomeres combined. Second tarsomere of hind tarsus 0.50 times as long as basitarsus, 1.40 times longer than fifth tarsomere (without pretarsus). Claws weakly curved.</p> <p>Metasoma 1.50 times longer than maximum width, 0.80 times longer than head and mesosoma combined. First tergum distinctly and regularly widened from base to apex, with convex and wide median area, with subparallel and narrow separated dorsal carinae; length of tergum 0.80 times apical width, 1.30 times length of propodeum; apical width of tergum 2.60 times basal width. Groove between second and third terga very shallow, almost indistinct medially, weakly curved. Median length of second tergum 0.85 times as long as basal width, 1.40 times longer than third tergum. Median length of second and third terga combined 1.40 times basal width of second tergum, equal to their maximum width. Apical terga shortly protruding behind third tergum. Ovipositor straight, rather slen- der, sheath 0.70 times as long as hind tibia, 0.50 times as long as metasoma, 0.65 times as long as mesosoma.</p> <p>Sculpture and pubescence. Vertex very densely and distinctly granulate, with distinct additional rugosity; frons densely granulate-rugulose; face almost entirely and distinctly densely granulate with strigation, with narrow and almost smooth area medially; temple entirely distinctly and densely granulate with rugosity along carina. Mesoscutum entirely, distinctly, and densely granulate, anteriorly with rugosity. Scutellum distinctly and densely granulate. Mesopleuron granulate-coriaceous and partly with rugulosity, almost smooth on small areas. Propodeum almost entirely coarsely areolate-rugose, with dense granulation in basal half; with indistinctly delineated areas; areola irregular, indistinctly delineated, rather long, distinctly separated from base of propodeum by basal carina, about 2.00 times longer than wide. Hind coxa mostly smooth, rugose-strigate dorsally. Hind femur almost entirely and distinctly granulate-rugose. First tergum entirely distinctly and sparsely carinate, finely rugulose to smooth on narrow median part, without additional microsculpture. Second tergum distinctly carinate in medio-basal half, rest of tergum smooth. Terga posterior to second tergum entirely smooth. Vertex entirely with rather dense, short, and almost recumbent pale setae. Mesonotum with dense, short, semi-erect pale setae spaced widely along notauli and narrowly laterally. Hind tibia dorsally with dense, short, and semi-erect setae, length of those setae 0.40 times as long as maximum width of hind tibia.</p> <p>Color. Body predominantly brownish yellow, metasoma behind second tergum light reddish brown, reddish brown in apical 0.25. Basal 0.60 of antenna yellowish brown, rest of antenna rather distinctly infuscate. Palpi yellow. Legs brownish yellow. Ovipositor sheath brown.</p> <p>Male. Unknown.</p> <p>Diagnosis. This new species is similar to C. planispinus but differs as follows: second tergum distinctly carinate; areola of propodeum not clearly delineated; head wider than mesoscutum; narrow, subcylindrical, subpointed apically lateral processes in posterior 0.25 of propodeum; first metasomal tergum sparsely carinate; and sculpture of mesoscutum and hind femur coarse.</p> <p>Distribution. Spain.</p></div> 	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B9118782FFDAFFA91099A8A5FE1D965D	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Belokobylskij, Sergey A.;Kula, Robert R.	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFDCFFA91099AF7BFECD9514.text	B9118782FFDCFFA91099AF7BFECD9514.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Dimeris Ruthe	<div><p>Genus Dimeris Ruthe</p> <p>Dimeris, with species known only from the Palearctic Region, was synonymized with Pambolus in Foerster (1862). It was treated as a junior synonym or subgenus of Pambolus (Belokobylskij &amp; Tobias 1986; Yu et al. 2005) until Belokobylskij (1986) revised its status as a valid genus. Only the type species, Dimeris mira Ruthe, is known, although it has two junior synonyms. The females of D. mira are brachypterous with lanceolate fore wings; males are macropterous.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B9118782FFDCFFA91099AF7BFECD9514	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Belokobylskij, Sergey A.;Kula, Robert R.	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFDCFFA81099ACD7FADB92E8.text	B9118782FFDCFFA81099ACD7FADB92E8.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Dimeris mira Ruthe	<div><p>Dimeris mira Ruthe</p> <p>(Fig. 117)</p> <p>Dimeris mira Ruthe, 1854: 345 [original description]; Belokobylskij 1986: 19, 22 [status revised from synonym to valid genus, designation of lectotype].</p> <p>Pambolus mira: Kirchner 1867: 114 [revised combination].</p> <p>Pambolus (Dimeris) mira: Fahringer 1930: 115 [subgeneric placement].</p> <p>Pambolus (Pambolus) mirus: Belokobylskij and Tobias 1986: 62 [subgeneric placement]. Pambolus melanocephalus Marshall, 1870: 228 [original description]. Synonymized in Marshall (1885).</p> <p>Paraptesis flavipes Magretti, 1884: 101 [original description]. Synonymized in Marshall (1885).</p> <p>Dimeris aptera Fitch in Marshall, 1885: 65. Nomen nudum (Belokobylskij 1986).</p> <p>Dimeris inermis Fitch in Marshall, 1885: 65. Nomen nudum (Belokobylskij 1986).</p> <p>Distribution. Austria, Finland, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Kazakhstan, Moldova, Mongolia, Ukraine, United Kingdom (Yu et al. 2005), North Africa (Shenefelt 1975), and Russia (South Urals) (Kostromina 2010).</p></div> 	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B9118782FFDCFFA81099ACD7FADB92E8	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Belokobylskij, Sergey A.;Kula, Robert R.	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFDDFFA81099A939FBAD977D.text	B9118782FFDDFFA81099A939FBAD977D.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Eupambolus amankutani Belokobylskij	<div><p>Eupambolus amankutani Belokobylskij</p> <p>Eupambolus amankutani Belokobylskij, 1985: 392 [original description].</p> <p>Distribution. Uzbekistan (Belokobylskij 1985). Remarks. This species is known only from the holotype male (apterous).</p></div> 	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B9118782FFDDFFA81099A939FBAD977D	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Belokobylskij, Sergey A.;Kula, Robert R.	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFDDFFA81099AE4EFBB49621.text	B9118782FFDDFFA81099AE4EFBB49621.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Eupambolus apterus Tobias	<div><p>Eupambolus apterus Tobias</p> <p>(Fig. 118)</p> <p>Eupambolus apterus Tobias, 1964: 179 [original description].</p> <p>Distribution. Kazakhstan (Tobias 1964). Remarks. This species in known only from the holotype female (apterous).</p></div> 	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B9118782FFDDFFA81099AE4EFBB49621	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Belokobylskij, Sergey A.;Kula, Robert R.	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFDDFFA81099ABE3FEF691B2.text	B9118782FFDDFFA81099ABE3FEF691B2.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Eupambolus Tobias	<div><p>Genus Eupambolus Tobias</p> <p>Eupambolus contains two species; it was described originally from North Kazakhstan (Tobias 1964) and recorded later from the mountains of Uzbekistan (Belokobylskij 1985). Both species have components of the mesosoma reduced in size and fused, with the sutures distinguishing those parts fine or absent and smooth. They also lack propodeal spines.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B9118782FFDDFFA81099ABE3FEF691B2	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Belokobylskij, Sergey A.;Kula, Robert R.	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFDDFFA81099AF83FF429478.text	B9118782FFDDFFA81099AF83FF429478.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Pambolus Haliday 1836	<div><p>Genus Pambolus Haliday sensu stricto</p> <p>Pambolus s. s. consists of 14 species and is represented in the Afrotropical, Australasian, Neotropical, and Palearctic regions (Yu et al. 2005). The females of all species in this genus are micropterous or brachypterous compared to macropterous females of the genus Phaenodus Foerster; the males of both genera are macropterous except for Phaenodus achterbergi Belokobylskij (Belokobylskij 1986; Belokobylskij 1993b). The difficulty of collecting brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous females is likely the reason for the paucity of information about species in this genus and the small number of specimens in collections. However, the genus is likely much more species-rich than currently known. Two new species are described below from arid and mountainous areas of the Palearctic Region.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B9118782FFDDFFA81099AF83FF429478	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Belokobylskij, Sergey A.;Kula, Robert R.	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFDDFFAB1099AD74FE20918B.text	B9118782FFDDFFAB1099AD74FE20918B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Pambolus biglumis Haliday	<div><p>Pambolus biglumis Haliday</p> <p>Rogas (Pambolus) biglumis Haliday, 1836: 50 [original description].</p> <p>Pambolus biglumis: Foerster 1862: 237 [revised combination].</p> <p>Pambolus (Pambolus) biglumis: Fahringer 1930: 116 [subgeneric placement]; Belokobylskij 1986: 27 [designation of lectotype]. Araphis dubia Fitch in Marshall, 1885: 65 [original description].</p> <p>Pambolus dubius: Marshall 1888: 218 [revised combination].</p> <p>Pambolus (Pambolus) dubius: Fahringer 1930: 116 [subgeneric placement]. Synonymized in Belokobylskij (1986).</p> <p>Araphis imminens Fitch in Marshall, 1885: 65 [original description].</p> <p>Pambolus imminens: Marshall 1888: 218 [revised combination].</p> <p>Pambolus (Pambolus) imminens: Fahringer 1930: 117 [subgeneric placement]. Synonymized in Belokobylskij (1986). Pezomachus rosenhaueri Ratzeburg, 1852: 247 [original description].</p> <p>Pambolus rosenhaueri: Marshall 1888: 219 [revised combination].</p> <p>Pambolus (Pambolus) rosenhaueri: Fahringer 1930: 117 [subgeneric placement]. Synonymized in Belokobylskij (1986).</p> <p>Distribution. Belgium, France, Germany, Hungary, Kazakhstan, Moldova, Mongolia, Netherlands, Romania, Russia (European part, South Urals, south of the Far East), Spain, and United Kingdom (Yu et al. 2005).</p> <p>Remarks. This species has been recorded predominantly from some southern regions of the western and eastern parts of the Palearctic and prefers open and sunny areas. The micropterous female is very rare in collections (Belokobylskij 1986).</p></div> 	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B9118782FFDDFFAB1099AD74FE20918B	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Belokobylskij, Sergey A.;Kula, Robert R.	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFDEFFAB1099A95FFD0897BB.text	B9118782FFDEFFAB1099A95FFD0897BB.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Pambolus brevipennis (Kieffer 1906)	<div><p>Pambolus brevipennis (Kieffer)</p> <p>Folchinia brevipennis Kieffer, 1906: 114 [original description].</p> <p>Pambolus brevipennis: Shenefelt 1975: 1160 [revised combination].</p> <p>Pambolus (Pambolus) brevipennis: Belokobylskij 1986: 31 [subgeneric placement].</p> <p>Distribution. Italy (Yu et al. 2005).</p> <p>Remarks. This is species is brachypterous and is known only from the female from Italy. The record in Yu et al. (2005) that it occurs in Germany, based on Belokobylskij and Taeger (2001), is erroneous. Pambolus brevipennis was not mentioned in the latter publication.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B9118782FFDEFFAB1099A95FFD0897BB	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Belokobylskij, Sergey A.;Kula, Robert R.	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFDEFFA41099AF0FFE7092F8.text	B9118782FFDEFFA41099AF0FFE7092F8.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Pambolus erogolus Belokobylskij & Kula 2012	<div><p>Pambolus erogolus Belokobylskij, sp. n.</p> <p>(Figs 33–42, 119)</p> <p>Type material. Holotype: female, “ Mongolia, Selenginskiy Aymak, Dulan-Khan, r.[eka] Ero-gol, step’, 3.VIII 1975, Narchuk” [Mongolia, Selenga Aymak, Dulan-Khan, Ero-gol River, steppe, 3.VIII 1975, Narchuk] (ZISP).</p> <p>Etymology. From “Ero-gol,” the name of the river of the type locality.</p> <p>Description. Female. Body length 2.90 mm.</p> <p>Head (dorsal view) 1.40 times as wide as median length, 1.55 times as wide as mesosoma at level of tegulae. Head behind eyes strongly, regularly, and weakly roundly narrowed. Transverse diameter of eye 2.00 times longer than temple (dorsal view). Ocelli in equilateral triangle. POL 1.60 times Od, 0.60 times OOL. Antennal sockets situated rather close to each other, diameter of socket 1.20 times distance between sockets, 1.40 times distance between socket and eye. Eye with short and sparse setae, almost without emargination opposite antennal socket, 1.25 times as high as broad. Malar space 0.70 times as high as eye, 1.80 times as high as basal width of mandible. Malar suture absent. Face very weakly convex, width 1.20 times eye height and 1.15 times height of face and clypeus combined. Tentorial pits rather large, distance between pits 0.85 times distance between pit and eye. Clypeus distinctly convex, straight on ventral margin, about twice as wide as high. Hypoclypeal depression oval, width 0.70 times distance from depression to eye, 0.45 times width of face. Occipital carina coarse, complete dorsally, joined ventrally with hypostomal carina above base of mandible. Hypostomal flange wide. Mandible rather slender, distinctly twisted. Head below eyes distinctly and convex-roundly narrowed (frontal view).</p> <p>Antenna rather thick, filiform, with 19 flagellomeres, 0.80 times as long as body. Scape short and wide, with very distinct excavation in apical and outer margin, 1.30 times longer than wide; inner length about twice as long as outer length. First flagellomere about twice as long as apical width, almost as long as second flagellomere. Penultimate flagellomere 1.70 times longer than wide, 0.70 times as long as first flagellomere, 0.85 times as long as apical flagellomere; the latter weakly pointed apically and without spine.</p> <p>Mesosoma weakly reduced in size, short, length 1.50 times height. Pronotum rather short, weakly convex dorsally, with distinct pronotal keel in anterior 0.40, anterior margin of pronotum almost straight and with narrow flange (dorsal view). Mesoscutum rather highly and almost perpendicularly elevated above pronotum, marginated laterally by distinct carina, 0.80 times as long as wide. Notauli rather deep and wide anteriorly, shallow and narrow posteriorly, complete, very sparsely crenulate with coriaceous sculpture. Prescutellar depression relatively deep, long, with three high wrinkles, almost smooth, 0.50 times as long as scutellum dorsally. Scutellum weakly convex, with rather distinct lateral carinae, almost as long as basal width. Metanotal tooth distinct, but small, subpointed. Subalar depression rather deep, strigate-granulate. Mesopleural pit developed, but shallow. Furrow along mesopleural suture distinct and coarsely crenulate. Precoxal suture rather shallow, wide, oblique, sparsely and distinctly crenulate, running along anterior 0.60 of lower part of mesopleuron. Prepectal carina very wide and coarse. Postpectal carina distinct. Metapleural lower lobe long, rather wide basally, rounded apically, directed forward. Propodeum (lateral view) strongly abrupted from basal 0.40, with long, subround (in dissection), wide basally and distinctly narrowed toward apex, weakly rounded apically lateral processes in posterior 0.35. In lateral view, mesothorax (on medial line) almost equal to prothorax and propodeum. Tegulae present.</p> <p>Wings. Size of wings strongly reduced, wings rather wide, subpointed apically, with three short basal veins, with rather large sclerotized spot in apical 0.40, protruding shortly behind base of propodeum.</p> <p>Legs. Femora thick and wide, without dorsal protuberance. Hind femur not curved basally, 3.00 times longer than maximum width. Hind tibia distinctly widened posteriorly. Hind tarsus 0.90 times as long as hind tibia. Hind basitarsus 0.70 times as long as second through fifth tarsomeres combined. Second tarsomere of hind tarsus 0.40 times as long as basitarsus, 0.90 times as long as fifth tarsomere (without pretarsus). Claws distinctly curved in apical half.</p> <p>Metasoma 1.80 times longer than maximum width, 1.10 times longer than head and mesosoma combined. First tergum with distinct lateral tubercles in basal 0.20, strongly, almost linearly and regularly, widened from base to apex, with weakly convex and narrow median area, with subparallel and narrowly separated dorsal carinae, dorsope deep, without spiracular tubercles, spiracles situated behind middle of tergum, in basal 0.55; length of tergum 0.90 times apical width, 1.10 times length of propodeum; apical width of tergum 2.40 times minimum basal width. Groove between second and third terga absent. Median length of second and third terga combined 1.55 times basal width of second tergum, 1.10 times maximum width. Apical terga shortly protruding behind third tergum. Ovipositor straight, very short, sheath 0.55 times as long as first metasomal tergum, 0.30 times as long as hind tibia, 0.80 times as long as hind basitarsus, 0.25 times as long as mesosoma.</p> <p>Sculpture and pubescence. Vertex very densely and distinctly granulate; frons densely granulate, additionally distinctly transversely strigate in median 0.30–0.50; face entirely densely granulate with fine strigation; temple densely granulate, finely granulate-coriaceous below, with coarse short rugosity along occipital carina. Sides of propleuron carinate-rugose medially, densely granulate below and above. Mesoscutum entirely distinctly and densely granulate, with rugosity anteriorly. Scutellum rather distinctly and densely granulate. Mesopleuron entirely and densely granulate, below with rugosity. Metapleuron coarsely areolate-rugose with dense and fine granulation. Propodeum densely and distinctly granulate in basal 0.40, coarsely rugose-carinate with dense granulation at least partially in posterior 0.60; areola more or less distinctly delineated by carina, long and narrow, with short basal carina. Hind coxa entirely densely granulate. Hind femur almost entirely with small but distinct granulae. First tergum distinctly and rather densely carinate medially, without carination laterally, entirely densely granulate-coriaceous. Second tergum very finely areolate-coriaceous basally, mostly smooth. Terga posterior to second tergum smooth. Vertex almost entirely with rather dense, short, and almost recumbent pale setae. Mesonotum with rather dense, short, semi-erect pale setae spaced rather widely along notauli and narrowly laterally. Second and third terga with very sparse, short, and almost erect setae; terga posterior to third tergum each with single row of semi-erect short setae along subposterior margin. Hind tibia dorsally with dense, short, and semi-erect setae, length of those setae 0.40–0.45 times as long as maximum width of hind tibia.</p> <p>Color. Body predominantly light reddish brown, metasoma almost black on wide median part in posterior 0.30. Three basal flagellomeres of antenna light reddish brown, fourth through 13th flagellomeres dark reddish brown to black, six apical flagellomeres yellowish brown. Palpi yellow. Legs brownish yellow. Ovipositor sheath black. Male. Unknown.</p> <p>Diagnosis. This new species is very similar to P. brevipennis from Italy but differs as follows: temple long; occipital carina joined with hypostomal carina; mesoscutum rather highly and distinctly elevated above pronotum; fore wing very short, oval, and without distinct venation; first tergum long, carinate only medially and entirely densely granulate-coriaceous; and antenna dark medially. Pambolus erogolus differs from the Western Palearctic P. tricolor (Ruthe) as follows: head behind eyes weakly convex, antennal flagellomeres slenderer and short, propodeum subvertically slanted in posterior half, all femora (especially fore femur) thick, and ovipositor short.</p> <p>Distribution. Mongolia.</p></div> 	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B9118782FFDEFFA41099AF0FFE7092F8	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Belokobylskij, Sergey A.;Kula, Robert R.	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFD1FFA41099ABCCFB7591A1.text	B9118782FFD1FFA41099ABCCFB7591A1.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Pambolus halteratus (Kieffer 1906)	<div><p>Pambolus halteratus (Kieffer)</p> <p>Folchinia halterata Kieffer, 1906: 114 [original description].</p> <p>Pambolus halteratus: Shenefelt 1975: 1161 [revised combination].</p> <p>Pambolus (Pambolus) halteratus: Belokobylskij 1986: 27 [subgeneric placement].</p> <p>Distribution. Italy (Sardinia) (Kieffer 1906). Remarks. Only a single specimen (holotype female) of this brachypterous species is known.</p></div> 	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B9118782FFD1FFA41099ABCCFB7591A1	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Belokobylskij, Sergey A.;Kula, Robert R.	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFD1FFA71099A922FE5C94D5.text	B9118782FFD1FFA71099A922FE5C94D5.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Pambolus ovchinnikovi Belokobylskij & Kula 2012	<div><p>Pambolus ovchinnikovi Belokobylskij, sp. n.</p> <p>(Figs 43–55, 120)</p> <p>Type material. Holotype: female, “ Kirgizia, Yu [zhnaia] okraina g. Bishkek, predgor’ia, pod kamnem, 17.X 1994, S. Ovchinnikov ” [Kyrgyzstan, south outskirts of Bishkek, foothills, under stone, 17.X 1994, S. Ovchinnikov leg] (ZISP).</p> <p>Etymology. In honor of the late Dr. Sergey Ovchinnikov, who collected the holotype.</p> <p>Description. Female. Body length 2.60 mm.</p> <p>Head (dorsal view) 1.80 times as wide as median length, 1.50 times as wide as mesosoma at level of tegulae. Head behind eyes (dorsal view) very weakly in anterior 0.30, and distinctly in posterior 0.70, roundly narrowed. Transverse diameter of eye 1.15 times longer than temple (dorsal view). Ocelli in triangle with base 1.10 times sides. POL 2.20 times Od, 0.50 times OOL. Antennal sockets situated rather widely from each other, diameter of socket equal to distance between sockets, 1.40 times distance between socket and eye. Eye with very short and sparse setae, without emargination opposite antennal socket, 1.20 times as high as broad. Malar space 0.90 times as high as eye, 1.90 times as high as basal width of mandible. Malar suture absent. Face convex, width 1.50 times eye height and 1.35 times height of face and clypeus combined. Tentorial pits rather large, distance between pits 0.80 times distance between pit and eye. Clypeus convex, almost straight on medioventral margin, about 2.50 times as wide as high. Hypoclypeal depression oval, width 0.70 times distance from depression to eye, 0.45 times width of face. Occipital carina distinct, complete dorsally, joined ventrally with hypostomal carina above base of mandible. Hypostomal flange wide. Mandible rather slender, weakly twisted. Head below eyes (front view) distinctly and roundly narrowed.</p> <p>Antenna rather thick, filiform, with 22 flagellomeres, almost as long as body. Scape short and wide, with very distinct excavation in apical and outer margin, 1.30 times longer than wide; inner length about twice as long as outer length. First flagellomere 2.40 times longer than apical width, as long as second flagellomere. Penultimate flagellomere 2.00 times longer than wide, 0.60 times as long as first flagellomere, 0.85 times as long as apical flagellomere; the latter obtuse apically and without spine.</p> <p>Mesosoma weakly reduced in size, short, length 1.50 times height. Pronotum rather short, convex dorsally, without pronotal keel, anterior margin of pronotum weakly convex and with wide flange (dorsal view). Mesoscutum highly and roundly elevated above pronotum, margined laterally by distinct carina, 0.60 times as long as wide. Notauli shallow and wide, complete, sparsely crenulate. Prescutellar depression deep, long, with three high wrinkles, finely granulate, 0.50 times as long as scutellum. Scutellum weakly convex, with distinct lateral carinae, almost as long as basal width. Metanotal tooth distinct, but short and rounded. Subalar depression shallow, narrow, strigate-granulate. Mesopleural pit distinct and elongate. Furrow along mesopleural suture distinct and finely shortly crenulate. Precoxal suture shallow, wide, oblique, sparsely crenulate, running along anterior 0.50 of lower part of mesopleuron. Prepectal carina wide and coarse. Postpectal carina rather distinct and short. Metapleural lower lobe long, wide, subpointed apically. Propodeum (lateral view) strongly abrupted from basal 0.40, with long, thick, subtriangular (in dissection), wide basally and distinctly narrowed toward apex, subpointed apically submedian lateral processes. In dorsal view, mesothorax (on medial line) about 4.00 times longer than prothorax and 1.50 times longer than propodeum. Tegulae present.</p> <p>Wings. Size of fore wing strongly reduced, wing oval, rounded apically, with three short basal veins, with large sclerotized spot in apical 0.40, protruding shortly behind base of propodeum. Size of hind wing very strongly reduced and apically with small sclerotized spot.</p> <p>Legs. Femora thick and wide, without dorsal protuberance. Hind femur evenly curved (dorsal view), not curved basally (lateral view), 3.10 times longer than wide. Hind tibia distinctly widened posteriorly. Hind tarsus 0.90 times as long as hind tibia. Hind basitarsus 0.60 times as long as second through fifth tarsomeres combined. Second tarsomere of hind tarsus 0.50 times as long as basitarsus, 1.20 times longer than fifth tarsomere (without pretarsus). Claws weakly curved in apical half.</p> <p>Metasoma 2.00 times longer than maximum width, 1.20 times longer than head and mesosoma combined. First tergum with short and wide lateral tubercles in basal 0.20, weakly widened basally, then strongly, almost linearly, and regularly widened to apex, with weakly convex, narrow, and parallel-sided median area, with weakly convergent dorsal carinae, dorsope deep, without spiracular tubercles, spiracles situated behind middle of tergum, in basal 0.60; length of tergum 0.70 times apical width, equal to length of propodeum; apical width of tergum 2.80 times minimum basal width. Groove between second and third terga absent. Median length of second and third terga combined 1.35 times basal width of second tergum, equal to maximum width. Apical terga distinctly protruding behind third tergum. Ovipositor weakly upcurved, rather long, sheath 1.60 times longer than first metasomal tergum, 0.70 times as long as hind tibia, 2.00 times longer than hind basitarsus, 0.70 times as long as mesosoma.</p> <p>Sculpture and pubescence. Vertex entirely, finely, and densely granulate, partly coriaceous; frons densely granulate, with fine carination medially and laterally; face widely smooth, with two narrow submedian vertical stripes with strigulation; temple densely granulate in upper 0.30, finely coriaceous to smooth below, with fine short rugae along carina. Sides of propleuron carinate-rugulose, with dense granulation below. Mesoscutum entirely finely and densely granulate, with very fine rugosity anteriorly, with three longitudinal wrinkles and fine rugulosity in medioposterior half. Scutellum mostly smooth, finely coriaceous laterally. Mesopleuron finely coriaceous, partly smooth. Metapleuron coarsely rugose-areolate, with dense and fine granulation anteriorly only. Propodeum finely granulate-coriaceous in basal half, coarsely strigate in apical half; areola distinctly delineated by carina, short and rather narrow, basal carina short, about as long as anterior fork of areola; petiolate area long, wide anteriorly and narrow posteriorly. Hind coxa densely carinate. Hind femur almost entirely and distinctly granulate. First tergum medially distinctly and densely carinate with very fine granulation, laterally almost smooth and partly coriaceous. Terga posterior to first tergum smooth. Vertex almost entirely with rather dense, long, and semi-erect pale setae. Mesonotum with dense, long, semi-erect pale setae spaced rather widely along notauli and narrowly laterally. Second tergum entirely and third tergum mostly with sparse, long, and almost erect setae; terga posterior to third tergum each with single row of semi-erect long setae along subposterior margin. Hind tibia dorsally with dense, short, and semi-erect setae, length of those setae about 0.50 times as long as maximum width of hind tibia.</p> <p>Color. Head yellowish brown, light reddish brown to reddish brown in upper 0.30. Mesosoma and first metasomal tergum yellowish brown or light reddish brown, metasomal terga posterior to third tergum black. Antenna predominantly black, brown apically, two basal segments yellowish brown. Palpi yellow. Legs predominantly yellow, hind femur yellowish brown. Ovipositor sheath black.</p> <p>Male. Unknown.</p> <p>Diagnosis. This new species is similar to P. biglumis (see description of female in Belokobylskij, 1986) but differs as follows: temple and malar space long, antenna with more flagellomeres, penultimate flagellomere long, mesoscutum laterally without depressions, propodeum obliquely slanted in posterior 0.70, first metasomal tergum short and wide, ovipositor long, mesonotum finely granulate, and propodeum mostly smooth with areolation. Pambolus ovchinnikovi also resembles P. tricolor but differs as follows: antenna dark in apical half; mesopleuron widely smooth and only partly finely coriaceous; temple finely or very finely granulate and partly with additional fine strigation; mesoscutum finely coriaceous; ovipositor upcurved; and metasoma behind first tergum with long, almost erect and rather dense setae.</p> <p>Distribution. Kyrgyzstan.</p></div> 	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B9118782FFD1FFA71099A922FE5C94D5	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Belokobylskij, Sergey A.;Kula, Robert R.	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFD4FFA11099ACAAFA8F948E.text	B9118782FFD4FFA11099ACAAFA8F948E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Hormius Nees	<div><p>Genus Hormius Nees</p> <p>Hormius Nees, a morphologically heterogeneous group known from all zoogeographic regions, consists of about 58 described species (Yu et al. 2005). It is divided into three subgenera, Hormius s. s., Hormisca Telenga, and Anhormius Belokobylskij, characterized by different levels of wing vein reduction and shortening of the radial cell (Belokobylskij 2001). Two species are strongly brachypterous: Hormius minialatus Tobias and Hormius dispar Brues from the Palearctic and Nearctic regions, respectively. Additionally, a male of Hormius moniliatus described by Hellén (1957) from Finland as H. moniliatus var. brevipennis has weakly shortened wings. Hormius minialatus is redescribed, and a new brachypterous species from the North Caucasus of Russia is described, below.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B9118782FFD4FFA11099ACAAFA8F948E	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Belokobylskij, Sergey A.;Kula, Robert R.	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFD4FFA11099AA87FE3F915A.text	B9118782FFD4FFA11099AA87FE3F915A.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Pambolus tricolor (Ruthe 1854)	<div><p>Pambolus tricolor (Ruthe)</p> <p>Araphis tricolor Ruthe, 1854: 347 [original description].</p> <p>Pambolus tricolor: Marshall 1888: 217 [revised combination].</p> <p>Pambolus (Pambolus) tricolor: Fahringer 1930: 117 [subgeneric placement]; Belokobylskij 1986: 29 [designation of lectotype].</p> <p>New material. Poland: 1 female, “PL, Białystok, 0.2a, FD49, rez. Antoniuk, 16.10.[20]01, leg. J. Sawoniewicz ” (ZISP); 1 female, “Poland, Rogów at Koluszki, R288, 21.9.[19]91, leg. J. Saw [oniewicz]” (ZISP).</p> <p>Distribution. Former Czechoslovakia, Germany (Yu et al. 2005), and Poland (new record).</p> <p>Remarks. Micropterous females of P. tricolor are known from Central Europe only. Marshall (1885) reported three apterous females, but their identities are unconfirmed. Thus, we do not regard aptery as present in females of Pambolus at this time.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B9118782FFD4FFA11099AA87FE3F915A	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Belokobylskij, Sergey A.;Kula, Robert R.	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFD4FFA11099AF02FE69954E.text	B9118782FFD4FFA11099AF02FE69954E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Phaenodus achterbergi : Belokobylskij 1993	<div><p>Phaenodus achterbergi Belokobylskij</p> <p>Pambolus (Phaenodus) achterbergi Belokobylskij, 1986: 36 [original description].</p> <p>Phaenodus achterbergi: Belokobylskij 1993b: 144 [revised combination].</p> <p>Distribution. Spain (Canary Islands) (Belokobylskij 1986).</p> <p>Remarks. This species is known only from Tenerife (Belokobylskij 1986), La Gomera, and Gran Canaria Islands (Guerrero &amp; Koponen 2000). Males are brachypterous; Guerrero and Koponen (2000) reported females but did not describe the wings.</p></div> 	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B9118782FFD4FFA11099AF02FE69954E	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Belokobylskij, Sergey A.;Kula, Robert R.	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFD4FFA11099A868FB9897B6.text	B9118782FFD4FFA11099A868FB9897B6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Phaenodus Foerster	<div><p>Genus Phaenodus Foerster</p> <p>Phaenodus, a genus of 28 species, is represented in all zoogeographic regions (Yu et al. 2005), and both sexes are macropterous in most species. The wings are sometimes slightly shortened in some species (e.g., Phaenodus pallipes Foerster “forma” rufigaster (Dahl), see Belokobylskij 1986). In this case discovery of the distinctly brachypterous P. achterbergi from the Canary Islands, the only species in the genus known to exhibit brachyptery, microptery, or aptery, is undoubtedly interesting and narrows the morphological differences between Pambolus and Phaenodus.</p> <p>Pambolus and Phaenodus mainly differ as follows: the females of Pambolus are always brachypterous or micropterous, and the males are always macropterous (vs. females always, and males usually, macropterous in Phaenodus); the males of Pambolus always lack the second radiomedial vein (vs. second radiomedial always present in Phaenodus); the vertex, temple, and mesopleuron are usually granulate in Pambolus (vs. usually smooth in Phaenodus). The placment of P. achterbergi in the genus Phaenodus is rather putative given complete reduction of the wing veins behind the pterostigma and overall wing size reduction in the male. However, P. achterbergi has the temple and mesopleuron smooth, conditions usually found in species of Phaenodus (Belokobylskij 1986). Therefore, the first author considers it a species of Phaenodus. Guerrero and Koponen (2000) reported P. achterbergi females, but we have not yet examined those specimens to confirm their identities.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B9118782FFD4FFA11099A868FB9897B6	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Belokobylskij, Sergey A.;Kula, Robert R.	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFD5FFA21099AA87FDA096F1.text	B9118782FFD5FFA21099AA87FDA096F1.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Hormius minialatus Tobias	<div><p>Hormius minialatus Tobias</p> <p>(Figs 56–66, 121)</p> <p>Hormius minialatus Tobias, 1977: 473 [original description].</p> <p>Examined material. Austria: 1 female, “ Ebelsb [er]g, Schiltenb [er]g, Autob. Dst. Mönchsgr., 22.7.[19]49, leg. Hamann ” (NHMW). Finland: 1 female, “ Vammeljoki ”, “Hellen”, “3113” (DABH). Mongolia: 2 females (holotype and paratype), “ Mongolia, Vostochnyi [East] aymak, 60 km VSV [ENE] Bayan-Burda, g.[ora] Daerkhin-Tsagan-Obo, 3. VIII.[1]976, Kerzhner” (ZISP). Russia: 1 female, Chita Province, Onon District, Nizhniy Tsasuchey, pine forest, 24.VII.1990 (A. Kotenko) (IZANU); 2 females (with longer wing), Chita Province, Kharanor, 9 VII 1963 (A. Emelyanov) (ZISP).</p> <p>Description. Female. Body length 1.90–2.40 mm.</p> <p>Head (dorsal view) 1.50–1.70 times as wide as median length, 1.30–1.60 times as wide as mesosoma at level of tegulae. Head behind eyes more or less distinctly roundly narrowed. Transverse diameter of eye 1.40–1.60 times longer than temple (dorsal view). Ocelli medium-sized, in triangle with base 1.10–1.25 times sides. POL 1.50–2.00 times Od, 0.40–0.50 times OOL. Antennal socket diameter 1.00–1.50 times distance between sockets, 1.50–2.00 times distance between socket and eye. Eye with short and sparse setae, with shallow emargination opposite antennal socket, 1.15–1.25 times as high as broad. Malar space 0.40–0.50 times as high as eye, 1.00–1.20 times as high as basal width of mandible. Malar suture very shallow. Face and clypeus distinctly convex, width of face 1.15–1.25 times eye height and 1.20–1.30 times height of face and clypeus combined. Hypoclypeal depression round, width 0.85–1.00 times distance from depression to eye, 0.40–0.45 times width of face. Occipital carina complete dorsally, weakly arched to ocelli medio-dorsally, joined ventrally with hypostomal carina above base of mandible. Hypostomal flange rather narrow. Head below eyes distinctly and weakly roundly narrowed (frontal view).</p> <p>Antenna thick, filiform, with 14–16 flagellomeres, 0.75–0.85 times as long as body. Scape rather short and thick, 1.40–1.70 times longer than width, 1.30–1.50 times longer than pedicel. First flagellomere 2.00–2.50 times longer than apical width, 1.00–1.10 times as long as second flagellomere; second flagellomere 2.00–2.20 times longer than width. Penultimate flagellomere 1.80–2.20 times longer than wide, 0.70–0.90 times as long as first flagellomere, 0.85–0.90 times as long as apical flagellomere; the latter weakly pointed apically and without spine.</p> <p>Mesosoma more or less reduced, length 1.70–1.90 times height. Pronotum rather long, convex dorsally, anterior margin weakly concave (dorsal view), pronotal keel almost absent. Mesoscutum distinctly and roundly elevated above pronotum, 0.70–0.85 times as long as wide. Notauli distinct, rather deep, more or less wide, complete, sparsely crenulate with granulation; fine or very fine median furrow sometimes present on median lobe. Prescutellar depression relatively deep, long, with single high median carina and often several lateral rugae, finely rugulose between rugae. Scutellum separated, with distinct lateral carinae. Subalar depression relatively deep, wide, granulate-strigate. Precoxal suture present, distinct, crenulate, running along anterior 0.50–0.60 of lower part of mesopleuron. Prepectal carina distinct. Postpectal carina absent. Metapleural lower lobe short, more or less wide, rounded apically. Propodeum regularly convex-roundly narrowed posteriorly (lateral view), without lateral tubercles, but with rather distinct postero-lateral carinae. In dorsal view, mesonotum 4.30–5.50 times longer than pronotum, 2.10–2.50 times longer than propodeum. Tegulae present.</p> <p>Wings. Size of wings more or less distinctly reduced, wings narrow, pointed or sometimes subrounded apically, with distinct venation in basal part, without sclerotized areas, protruding behind apex of propodeum, sometimes reaching apex of first tergum or (rarely) middle of metasoma.</p> <p>Legs. Femora more or less slender. Hind femur 4.00–4.70 times longer than maximum width. Hind tarsus 0.85–0.90 times as long as hind tibia. Hind tibia weakly widened posteriorly. Hind basitarsus with dense row of long bristles along ventral margin, 0.60–0.70 times as long as second through fifth tarsomeres combined. Second tarsomere of hind tarsus 0.40–0.45 times as long as basitarsus, 1.00–1.20 times longer than fifth tarsomere (without pretarsus). Claws distinctly curved.</p> <p>Metasoma 1.30–1.70 times longer than maximum width, 0.75–0.90 times longer than head and mesosoma combined. First tergum distinctly and rather regularly widened from base to apex, with dorsal carinae complete, widely separated, subparallel or sinuate in posterior half; length of tergum 0.70–0.85 times apical width, almost equal to length of propodeum; apical width of tergum 1.60–2.00 times basal width. Groove between second and third terga distinct and weakly curved. Second tergum with sublateral oblique furrows more or less distinct but shallow or very shallow posteriorly, curved and almost parallel to lateral margins of tergum. Median length of second tergum 0.90–1.10 times as long as apical width of first tergum, 1.30–1.60 times length of third tergum. Median length of second and third terga combined 0.65–0.75 times maximum width. Ovipositor straight, sheath (depending on prominence behind tip of metasoma) 0.80–1.40 times longer than first metasomal tergum, 0.20–0.45 times as long as hind tibia, 0.15–0.40 times as long as mesosoma.</p> <p>Sculpture and pubescence. Vertex densely and distinctly granulate, additionally more or less distinctly and weakly undulately strigate and rugulose, rarely vertex distinctly rugose-granulate, with short rugae along occipital carina; frons densely granulate-rugose or granulate-strigate; face distinctly and densely granulate with rugosity at least partly, narrow area smooth or almost smooth medially; temple entirely and densely distinctly granulate with rather coarse or fine areolate-rugosity. Mesoscutum entirely, distinctly, and densely granulate, often with rugosity anteriorly along notauli, finely granulate posteriorly. Scutellum finely or distinctly granulate. Mesopleuron mostly granulate-coriaceous, partially carinate, usually smooth in small submedian areas, rugose-strigate postero-ventrally. Propodeum entirely coarsely areolate-rugose, with granulation basally and (finely) between rugae; with more or less distinctly delineated areola and distinctly separated petiolate area; areola short and wide, 1.30–1.80 times longer than maximum width, distinctly separated from base of propodeum by more or less short basal carina. Hind femur areolate-rugose in upper half, almost smooth or sometimes finely granulate-coriaceous in lower half. First tergum rather finely and more or less densely carinate or partly carinate-rugulose, with more or less smooth or almost smooth (finely coriaceous) areas laterally, medially usually widely carinate-rugulose or sometimes only rugulose. Terga posterior to first tergum smooth, but shallowly punctate. Vertex entirely with rather dense, short, and semi-erect pale setae. Mesonotum with rather dense, short, semi-erect pale setae along notauli and laterally. Hind tibia dorsally with dense, short, and semi-erect setae, length of those setae 0.50–0.75 times maximum width of hind tibia.</p> <p>Color. Body predominantly reddish brown, sometimes light or dark reddish brown to partly black, usually prothorax, often mesopleuron, mesosternum, and mesoscutum at least partly light reddish brown or at least pale, sometimes prothorax brownish yellow; metasoma widely medially yellowish brown or at least paler than lateral parts. Antenna predominantly dark brown, two to four basal segments of antenna reddish brown or at least paler. Palpi brownish yellow or pale brown. Legs light reddish brown or yellowish brown, hind tibia pale basally. Ovipositor sheath more or less reddish brown, infuscate apically, sometimes entirely almost black.</p> <p>Male. Unknown.</p> <p>Distribution. Austria (new record), Finland (new record), Mongolia, and Russia (Chita Province) (Yu et al. 2005).</p> <p>Remarks. The degree of reduction in wing size tends to vary within a brachypterous species. The fore wing extends behind the apex of the propodeum in some specimens of H. minialatus from the Chita Province of Russia and Mongolian Eastern Aymak; the fore wing extends behind the apex of the first tergum or to the middle of the metasoma in other specimens from those areas. Such variation demonstrates the limitations of using reduction in wing size for species diagnostics.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B9118782FFD5FFA21099AA87FDA096F1	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Belokobylskij, Sergey A.;Kula, Robert R.	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFD7FF9C1099AFF2FD18949F.text	B9118782FFD7FF9C1099AFF2FD18949F.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Hormius stauropolicus Belokobylskij & Kula 2012	<div><p>Hormius stauropolicus Belokobylskij, sp. n.</p> <p>(Figs 67–75)</p> <p>Type material. Holotype: female, Russia, “Stavropol’skiy kray, Shpakovskoe, sukhoy lug [dry meadow], 10.07.1988, Belokobylskij” (ZISP).</p> <p>Description. Female. Body length 2.30 mm.</p> <p>Head (dorsal view) 1.50 times as wide as median length, 1.50 times as wide as mesosoma at level of tegulae. Head behind eyes distinctly roundly narrowed. Transverse diameter of eye 1.60 times longer than temple (dorsal view). Ocelli small, almost in equilateral triangle. POL about 2.00 times Od, 0.40 times OOL. Antennal socket diameter almost equal to distance between sockets, 1.30 times distance between socket and eye. Eye with short and sparse setae, with very fine emargination opposite antennal socket, 1.25 times as high as broad. Malar space 0.40 times as high as eye, 1.20 times as high as basal width of mandible. Malar suture absent. Face and clypeus distinctly convex, width of face 1.10 times eye height and 1.20 times height of face and clypeus combined. Hypoclypeal depression round, width almost equal to distance from depression to eye, 0.45 times width of face. Occipital carina complete dorsally, not arched to ocelli medio-dorsally, almost joined ventrally with hypostomal carina above base of mandible. Hypostomal flange rather distinct. Head below eyes distinctly and weakly roundly narrowed (frontal view).</p> <p>Antenna thick, filiform, with 16 flagellomeres, 0.80 times as long as body. Scape rather short and thick, 1.40 times longer than maximum width, 1.20 times longer than pedicel. First flagellomere almost 2.00 times longer than apical width, as long as second flagellomere; second flagellomere 1.80 times longer than width. Penultimate flagellomere 1.80 times longer than wide, 0.90 times as long as first flagellomere, as long as apical flagellomere; the latter weakly pointed apically and without spine.</p> <p>Mesosoma more or less reduced in size, length 1.80 times height. Pronotum rather long, convex dorsally, anterior margin weakly concave (dorsal view), pronotal keel almost absent. Mesoscutum distinctly and gradually roundly elevated above pronotum, 0.85 times as long as maximum width. Notauli distinct, rather deep, more or less wide, complete, rugulose-granulate; without furrow on median lobe. Prescutellar depression relatively deep, long, with single median carina, distinctly and densely strigate-rugulose. Scutellum separated, with distinct lateral carinae. Subalar depression relatively shallow, wide, granulate-strigate. Precoxal suture present, distinct, densely crenulate-rugose, running along anterior 0.55 of lower part of mesopleuron. Prepectal carina distinct. Postpectal carina absent. Metapleural lower lobe short, more or less wide, rounded apically. Propodeum more or less regularly convex-roundly narrowed posteriorly (lateral view), without lateral tubercles and postero-lateral carinae. In dorsal view, mesonotum 4.70 times longer than pronotum, 2.30 times longer than propodeum. Tegulae present.</p> <p>Wings. Size of wings distinctly reduced, wings narrow, subpointed apically, with distinct venation in basal part, without sclerotized areas, reaching middle of propodeum.</p> <p>Legs. Femora more or less slender. Hind femur 4.10 times longer than maximum width. Hind tarsus 0.90 times as long as hind tibia. Hind tibia weakly widened posteriorly. Claws distinctly curved.</p> <p>Metasoma 1.70 times longer than maximum width, 0.80 times longer than head and mesosoma combined. First tergum distinctly and rather regularly widened from base to apex, with dorsal carinae widely separated, complete, weakly curved for most of length but distinctly curved apically; length of tergum 0.70 times apical width, almost equal to length of propodeum; apical width of tergum 1.80 times minimum basal width. Groove between second and third terga distinct, wide, weakly curved. Second tergum with sublateral oblique furrows shallow or very shallow posteriorly and almost parallel to lateral margins of tergum. Median length of second tergum 1.10 times longer than apical width of first tergum, 1.70 times length of third tergum. Median length of second and third terga combined 0.85 times maximum width. Ovipositor straight, sheath almost as long as first metasomal tergum, 0.30 times as long as hind tibia, 0.25 times as long as mesosoma.</p> <p>Sculpture and pubescence. Vertex densely and distinctly granulate, additionally with distinct areolate-rugosity, with short rugae along occipital carina; frons densely granulate, partly with fine rugulosity; face distinctly and densely granulate and partly with fine rugosity, narrow area nearly smooth medially; temple distinctly, entirely, and densely granulate with rather fine rugosity. Mesoscutum entirely, distinctly, and densely granulate, with short rugosity anteriorly along notauli, finely granulate posteriorly. Scutellum rather distinctly granulate. Mesopleuron finely granulate-coriaceous, with distinctly curved carination dorsally and postero-ventrally, smooth in submedian areas. Propodeum entirely rugose-areolate, with dense granulation basally; with rather distinctly delineated areola and unclearly separated short petiolate area; areola rather long and wide, about twice longer than maximum width, almost fused anteriorly with base of propodeum. Hind femur more or less smooth, finely rugulose-carinate dorsally. First tergum almost entirely smooth, with very fine carination or rugulosity basolaterally and along dorsal carinae. Terga posterior to first tergum smooth, without punctation. Vertex with sparse, short, and semi-erect pale setae. Mesonotum with rather sparse, short, semi-erect pale setae along notauli and laterally. Hind tibia dorsally with dense, short, and semi-erect setae, length of those setae 0.50–0.60 times maximum width of hind tibia.</p> <p>Color. Head, mesosoma mostly, and metasoma basally and apically reddish brown to dark reddish brown, prothorax almost yellow, metasoma widely medially yellowish brown. Antenna brownish yellow in basal 0.40, brown to dark brown in apical 0.60. Palpi yellow. Legs yellow basally, mostly light reddish brown, hind tibia pale basally. Ovipositor sheath dark reddish brown.</p> <p>Male. Unknown.</p> <p>Diagnosis. This new species is very similar to H. minialatus but differs as follows: first metasomal tergum almost entirely smooth, head more strongly narrowed behind eyes, and vertex granulate and without rugulosity. Distribution. Russia (Stauropol’ Territory).</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B9118782FFD7FF9C1099AFF2FD18949F	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Belokobylskij, Sergey A.;Kula, Robert R.	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFEAFF9F1099AACDFC2B9290.text	B9118782FFEAFF9F1099AACDFC2B9290.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Aleiodes Wesmael	<div><p>Genus Aleiodes Wesmael</p> <p>Rogadinae was divided into five tribes, Aleiodini, Yeliconini, Rogadini, Stiropiini, and Clinocentrini, based on results of a recent molecular cladistic analysis (Zaldivar et al. 2008b). Aleiodes, the largest genus of Rogadinae with about 275 described species worldwide, is represented in all zoogeographic regions (Yu et al. 2005). Aleiodes hemipterus Marshall, a species with brachypterous females known from North Africa (Shenefelt 1975), is the only species of Rogadinae with wings reduced in size. The female is redescribed and male described for the first time below based on the holotype female and specimens from Morocco.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B9118782FFEAFF9F1099AACDFC2B9290	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Belokobylskij, Sergey A.;Kula, Robert R.	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFEAFF981099A854FE66928B.text	B9118782FFEAFF981099A854FE66928B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Aleiodes (Chelonorhogas) hemipterus (Marshall 1897) Belokobylskij & Kula 2012	<div><p>Aleiodes (Chelonorhogas) hemipterus (Marshall), stat. n.</p> <p>(Figs 76–86, 122)</p> <p>Rhogas hemipterus Marshall, 1897: 137 [original description].</p> <p>Rhogas (Rhogas) hemipterus: Telenga 1941: 149 [subgeneric placement].</p> <p>Rogas hemipterus: Shenefelt 1975: 1233 [Rhogas unjustified emendation of Rogas].</p> <p>Aleiodes hemipterus: Papp 1990: 90 [revised combination]; Papp 2003b: 138 [invalid designation of lectotype].</p> <p>Examined material. Morocco: 1 female, 1 male, “Mogador (= Essaouira), Mz Escalera”, “Coleccion Cabrera” (MNCN); 1 female, “Marruecos, Mogador (= Essaouira), V-1907, Escalera” (MNCN). Tunisia: 1 female (lectotype), “Tunesia”, “Sicierd” (?), “Type H.T.”, “ B.M. Type Hym. 3.c.243”, “ B.M. Type Hym. Rhogas hemipterus Marshall 1896 ”, “ hemipterus Marsh. ” (BMNH).</p> <p>Description. Female. Body length 7.70–8.20 mm; fore wing length 1.50–2.00 mm.</p> <p>Head (dorsal view) 1.55–1.60 times as wide as median length, 1.40–1.50 times as wide as mesosoma at level of tegulae. Head behind eyes weakly convex in anterior half and distinctly roundly narrowed in posterior half. Transverse diameter of eye 1.00–1.20 times longer than temple (dorsal view). Ocelli large, in triangle with base 1.10 times sides. POL 0.90–1.00 times Od, 0.80–1.00 times OOL. Antennal socket diameter 1.70–2.50 times distance between sockets, 1.10–1.40 times distance between socket and eye. Eye with rather distinct, short, and sparse setae, with more or less distinct and wide emargination opposite antennal socket, 1.50–1.70 times as high as broad. Malar space 0.35–0.45 times as high as eye, 0.80–1.00 times as high as basal width of mandible. Malar suture absent. Face weakly convex, width 1.10–1.20 times eye height and 1.60–1.70 times height of face and clypeus combined. Hypoclypeal depression large and transverse, width 1.50–1.60 times distance from depression to eye, 0.60 times width of face. Occipital carina complete dorsally, absent ventrally and not joined with hypostomal carina. Hypostomal flange rather narrow. Mandible thick and wide basally. Head below eyes weakly and roundly narrowed (front view). Palpi short.</p> <p>Antenna thick, weakly setiform, with 48 flagellomeres, 0.80 times as long as body. Scape 1.40–1.60 times longer than maximum width. First flagellomere 1.30–1.50 times longer than apical width, 1.05–1.15 times longer than second flagellomere. Penultimate flagellomere 1.50 times longer than wide, 0.60 times as long as first flagellomere, 0.70 times as long as apical flagellomere; the latter pointed apically and without spine.</p> <p>Mesosoma weakly reduced in size, length 1.70–1.90 times height. Anterior margin of pronotum weakly convex or almost straight (dorsal view). Mesoscutum distinctly and gradually roundly elevated above pronotum, almost as long as wide; median lobe with two more or less distinct submedian longitudinal furrows and not high but distinct longitudinal median carina. Notauli rather deep, more or less narrow, complete, crenulate with rugosity. Prescutellar depression deep, rather long, with three distinct wrinkles, finely or very finely reticulate. Scutellum large, weakly convex, with high or distinct lateral carinae. Subalar depression more or less deep and coarsely rugose-carinate. Precoxal suture rather shallow, wide, coarsely rugose-reticulate, running along anterior 0.60–0.70 of lower part of mesopleuron. Prepectal carina coarse. Metapleural lower lobe rather long, wide, rounded apically. Propodeum almost horizontal or weakly oblique in anterior half and strongly or very strongly oblique in posterior half, submedially with thick, short, and rounded lateral corner. Tegulae present.</p> <p>Wings. Size of wings strongly reduced, fore wing rather narrow, with almost complete venation, sometimes with second radiomedial vein, brachial cell open apically, reaching base of metasoma.</p> <p>Legs. Femora rather slender. Hind femur 3.50–4.40 times longer than wide. Hind tarsus 0.80 times as long as hind tibia. Hind tibia more or less widened posteriorly, long (inner) spur 0.30–0.40 times as long as hind basitarsus. Hind basitarsus 0.55–0.60 times as long as second through fifth tarsomeres combined. Second tarsomere of hind tarsus 0.55–0.60 times as long as basitarsus, 1.10–1.40 times longer than fifth tarsomere (without pretarsus). Claws wide, distinctly curved, with four to five distinct, slender, and pale spines.</p> <p>Metasoma. First three terga almost as long as head and mesosoma combined. First tergum thick (lateral view), highly convex in basal 0.30, strongly and almost linearly widened basally before dorsope, then weakly, evenly, and linearly widened toward posterior margin; with small and wide subbasal processes opposite dorsope, with more or less distinctly delineated, rather wide, and almost pointed posteriorly basal triangle area, with more or less high median carina and lateral carinae usually distinct and divergent posteriorly; length of tergum 1.10–1.20 times apical width, 1.60–1.90 times length of propodeum; apical width of tergum 1.50–1.60 times width at level of dorsope and 2.80–3.20 times minimum basal width. Groove between second and third terga distinct, shallow, weakly curved. Second tergum with high and complete median carina; median length of tergum almost as long as basal width, 0.80–0.85 times as long as apical width, 1.20–1.30 times longer than third tergum. Third tergum without or sometimes with rather fine median carina in basal half. Median length of second and third terga combined 1.70– 1.80 times basal width of second tergum, 1.40–1.50 times maximum width. Apical terga not or sometimes weakly protruding behind third tergum. Ovipositor straight, sheath 0.50–0.80 times as long as hind basitarsus.</p> <p>Sculpture and pubescence. Vertex and frons densely and distinctly or coarsely undulately strigate and with usually coarse rugosity between strigae, areolate-rugose near ocellar triangle; face entirely areolate-rugose and with additional strigae directed from middle to latero-ventral; temple coarsely rugose-strigate. Mesoscutum and scutellum distinctly and densely rugose-areolate. Meso- and metapleuron entirely coarsely and densely rugose-areolate. Propodeum entirely coarsely rugulose-areolate, with distinct and complete undulate longitudinal median carina. Hind coxa densely rugose-areolate dorsally, densely and distinctly punctate or rugose-punctate laterally. Hind femur entirely very densely and distinctly punctate. First and second terga entirely coarsely undulately carinate with rugosity between striae. Third tergum densely and distinctly carinate with fine rugulosity, carinulae weakly directed to middle line of tergum, sometimes apically tergum rugose-areolate with several subtransverse wrinkles. Vertex entirely with dense, short, and semi-erect pale setae. Mesonotum entirely with very dense, short, and semierect yellow or whitish setae.</p> <p>Color. Body predominantly brownish yellow or reddish brown, mesosoma widely reddish brown or with wide brown spots, sometimes (in type) mesoscutum brownish yellow, scutellum and metanotum light reddish brown; head mostly brown or reddish brown, often yellowish brown or pale in lower 0.30–0.60. Scape and pedicel light reddish brown or reddish brown, flagellum mostly yellow or reddish brown, dark in apical 0.20. Palpi yellow, more or less dark basally. Legs predominantly brownish yellow or partly light reddish brown, trochanters usually yellow, all femora and sometimes coxae dark brown or dark reddish brown and with pale apex. Wings infuscate. Ovipositor sheath yellowish brown or light brown in basal 0.20–0.50 and black in apical 0.50–0.80.</p> <p>Male (first record). Body length 8.00 mm; fore wing length 6.30 mm. Transverse diameter of eye 1.40 times longer than temple (dorsal view). POL 0.70 times Od. Malar space 0.30 times as high as eye, 0.70 times as high as basal width of mandible. Face width equal to eye height and 1.50 times height of face and clypeus combined. Hypoclypeal depression width almost 2.00 times distance from depression to eye, 0.55 times width of face. First flagellomere of antenna 1.70 times longer than apical width, 1.30 times longer than second flagellomere. Mesosoma not reduced in size, length 1.75 times maximum height. Mesoscutum and lower part of mesosoma yellow. Median lobe of mesoscutum only with rather distinct median longitudinal keel. Prescutellar depression with five wrinkles. Precoxal suture shallow, running along anterior 0.70 of lower part of mesopleuron. Propodeum distinctly, but not strongly, oblique in posterior half. Size of wings not reduced. Fore wing long, about 3.00 times longer than maximum width. Radial cell weakly shortened. Metacarp 1.20 times longer than pterostigma. Pterostigma brown, pale basally. Second abscissa of radial vein 3.30 times longer than first abscissa, 0.60 times as long as third abscissa, 1.40 times longer than first radiomedial vein. Second radiomedial cell narrowed distally, 2.00 times longer than maximum width, almost as long as brachial cell. Recurrent vein 3.60 times longer than second medial abscissa, 0.80 times as long as first radiomedial vein. First medial abscissa distinctly sinuate. Discoidal cell 2.20 times longer than maximum width. Distance between nervulus and basal vein 2.30 times nervulus length. Hind wing about 3.50 times longer than maximum width. First abscissa of mediocubital vein 1.30 times longer than second abscissa. Radial vein distinctly widened toward apex. Hind basitarsus 0.55 times as long as second through fifth tarsomeres combined. First tergum with rather wide basal triangle area and with lateral wrinkles less distinct; length of tergum 1.30 times apical width, 1.40 times length of propodeum; apical width of tergum 1.40 times width at level of dorsope and 2.20 times basal width. Median length of second tergum 1.20 times longer than third tergum. Third tergum densely and distinctly undulately carinate with rugulosity, punctate posteriorly. Apical protruding terga smooth.</p> <p>Distribution. Morocco (new record), Tunisia (Marshall 1897).</p> <p>Diagnosis. The male, reported and described herein for the first time, is macropterous. This species actually belongs to the subgenus Chelonorhogas Enderlein, not the subgenus Aleiodes as indicated in Yu et al. (2005), based on the following features: hind tarsal spur long, radial cell of hind wing in male distinctly widened apically, and mesosoma without granulate sculpture.</p> <p>Remarks. Yu et al. (2005) indicate that a lectotype was disgnated for Rogas hemipterus Marshall, 1897 in Papp (2003). However, Papp (2003) merely mentioned “Female lectotype in The Natural History Museum, London (3.c.243).” This does not satisfy article 74.7.3 of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature because Papp (2003) did not include an express statement of deliberate designation (International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature 1999, 2003).</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B9118782FFEAFF981099A854FE66928B	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Belokobylskij, Sergey A.;Kula, Robert R.	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFEDFF981099A89DFADE9028.text	B9118782FFEDFF981099A89DFADE9028.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Bracon Fabricius	<div><p>Genus Bracon Fabricius</p> <p>Bracon contains about 830 described species placed in 16 subgenera; slightly more than half are known from the Northern Hemisphere (Yu et al. 2005). In the Palearctic Region most species are found in the south and often occur in arid or semi-arid areas. A new micropterous species of Bracon from Algeria is described below. It is the first species of Braconinae known to exhibit wing size reduction despite the high species-richness of this subfamily.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B9118782FFEDFF981099A89DFADE9028	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Belokobylskij, Sergey A.;Kula, Robert R.	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFEDFF9A1099A9BCFE68950B.text	B9118782FFEDFF9A1099A9BCFE68950B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Bracon (Habrobracon) barbieri Belokobylskij & Kula 2012	<div><p>Bracon (Habrobracon) barbieri Belokobylskij, sp. n.</p> <p>(Figs 87–96, 123)</p> <p>Type material. Holotype: female, Algeria, “Mers-el-Kebir, Oran, 25.1.[19]58, J. Barbier ”, “310” (MNHN). Paratype: 1 male with the same label as holotype (MNHN).</p> <p>Description. Female. Body length 2.30 mm.</p> <p>Head (dorsal view) 1.50 times as wide as median length, 1.50 times as wide as mesosoma at level of tegulae. Head behind eyes distinctly and regularly roundly narrowed. Transverse diameter of eye 1.40 times longer than temple (dorsal view). Ocelli small, in triangle with base about 1.10 times sides. POL 2.30 times Od, 0.60 times OOL. Antennal socket diameter about 1.50 times as wide as distance between sockets and distance between socket and eye. Eye glabrous, with weak emargination opposite antennal socket, 1.45 times as high as broad. Malar space 0.30 times as high as eye, about 0.80 times as high as basal width of mandible. Malar suture absent. Face width 0.90 times eye height and 1.60 times height of face and clypeus combined. Width of hypoclypeal depression about 1.20 times distance from depression to eye, 0.40 times width of face. Hypostomal flange very narrow. Mandible rather large. Head below eyes distinctly and almost linearly narrowed (frontal view). Palpi rather short, maxillary palpi with five palpomeres, labial palpi with three palpomeres.</p> <p>Antenna rather thick, almost filiform, with 16 flagellomeres, 0.75 times as long as body. Scape 1.60 times longer than wide. First flagellomere 2.50 times longer than apical width, 1.10 times longer than second flagellomere. Penultimate flagellomere 1.60 times longer than wide, 0.65 times as long as first flagellomere, 0.80 times as long as apical flagellomere; the latter pointed apically and without spine.</p> <p>Mesosoma more or less reduced in size, length 1.90 times height. Pronotum rather long, with distinct pronotal keel situated submedially. Mesoscutum weakly and roundly elevated above pronotum, 0.75 times as long as wide. Notauli more or less distinct and wide in anterior half, absent posteriorly. Prescutellar depression rather deep, distinctly crenulate. Scutellum distinct, without lateral carinae. Subalar depression distinct and crenulate. Mesopleuron with shallow wide oblique submedian furrow. Precoxal suture absent. Prepectal and postpectal carinae absent. Propodeum regularly roundly narrowed (lateral view). In dorsal view, mesonotum 4.00 times longer than pronotum, 1.50 times longer than propodeum. Tegulae present.</p> <p>Wings. Size of wings strongly reduced, fore wing rather wide, rounded apically, with short veins, protruding shortly behind base of propodeum.</p> <p>Legs. Fore tibia with several slender spines. Femora rather thick, without dorsal protuberance. Hind femur 3.70 times longer than maximum width. Hind tarsus 1.15 times longer than hind tibia. Hind tibia weakly widened posteriorly. Hind basitarsus 0.50 times as long as second through fifth tarsomeres combined. Second tarsomere of hind tarsus 0.60 times as long as basitarsus, 1.10 times longer than fifth tarsomere (without pretarsus). Claws weakly curved.</p> <p>Metasoma 0.90 times as long as head and mesosoma combined. First tergum distinctly widened toward spiracular tubercles, then almost parallel-sided, with distinct spiracular tubercles in basal 0.30, with sub-triangular wide median area separated by shallow to very shallow furrows; length of tergum 1.30 times apical width, 0.80 times length of propodeum; apical width of tergum 1.50 times minimum basal width. Groove between second and third terga very shallow and weakly curved. Median length of second tergum 0.75 times as long as basal width, almost as long as third tergum. Median length of second and third terga combined 1.50 times basal width, 0.80 times maximum width. Ovipositor straight, sheath 1.80 times longer than hind basitarsus, 0.30 times as long as metasoma, 0.40 times as long as mesosoma.</p> <p>Sculpture and pubescence. Vertex smooth; frons finely coriaceous; face almost entirely and rather distinctly densely granulate; temple finely to very finely coriaceous. Mesosoma mostly densely granulate, with almost smooth areas on mesopleuron; propodeum posteriorly and metapleuron with rugosity. Hind coxa almost entirely densely granulate. Hind femur more or less smooth, granulate-coriaceous dorsally. First and second terga densely granulate, first tergum coriaceous mediobasally. Third tergum coriaceous. Terga posterior to third tergum almost smooth. Vertex with sparse, short, and semi-erect white setae in posterior 0.30. Mesonotum entirely with sparse, rather long, semi-erect white setae. Third through sixth metasomal terga with two rows of rather dense, short, semierect setae. Hind tibia dorsally with dense, rather long, and semi-erect setae, length of those setae 0.75–1.00 times as long as maximum width of hind tibia.</p> <p>Color. Body predominantly black. Scape and apical half of flagellum dark reddish brown to black, basal half of flagellum reddish brown. Palpi dark brown. Legs dark reddish brown, trochanters and basal 0.30 of tibiae reddish brown, first through fourth tarsomeres yellowish brown. Ovipositor sheath black.</p> <p>Male. Body length 1.90 mm. Head (dorsal view) 1.45 times as wide as median length, 1.35 times as wide as mesosoma at level of tegulae. Transverse diameter of eye 1.10 times longer than temple (dorsal view). Ocelli in triangle with base 1.20 times sides. POL about 3.00 times Od, 0.50 times OOL. Antennal socket almost as wide as distance between sockets, 1.50 times as wide as distance between socket and eye. Eye almost without emargination opposite antennal socket, 1.35 times as high as broad. Malar space about 0.60 times as high as basal width of mandible. Face width 1.20 times height of face and clypeus combined. Antenna weakly thickened toward apex, with 17 flagellomeres, 0.90 times as long as body. Scape 1.40 times longer than wide. First flagellomere 3.00 times longer than apical width, as long as second flagellomere. Penultimate flagellomere 2.50 times longer than wide, 0.85 times as long as first flagellomere, 0.90 times as long as apical flagellomere. Pronotum with fine pronotal keel situated before middle of pronotal collar. Mesoscutum 0.80 times as long as wide. Subalar depression shallow. Mesopleuron with distinct oval oblique submedian depression. In dorsal view, mesonotum 3.00 times longer than pronotum. Wings rather narrow, pointed apically. Hind femur 3.50 times longer than maximum width. Hind tarsus as long as hind tibia. Second tarsomere of hind tarsus 0.55 times as long as basitarsus, 1.15 times longer than fifth tarsomere (without pretarsus). Median length of second tergum 0.80 times as long as basal width, 1.20 times longer than third tergum. Median length of second and third terga combined 1.40 times basal width of second tergum, 0.75 times maximum width. Frons widely almost smooth medially, coriaceous laterally. Mesopleuron finely undulately strigate. Third tergum finely granulate. Otherwise similar to female.</p> <p>Diagnosis. This new species is placed in the subgenus Habrobracon Ashmead based on abundant granulate sculpture on the head, mesosoma, and basal part of the metasoma. It differs from all known species of Habrobracon as follows: wings very strongly reduced, mesosoma densely and almost entirely granulate, and mesopleuron with distinct submedian depression.</p> <p>Distribution. Algeria.</p></div> 	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B9118782FFEDFF9A1099A9BCFE68950B	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Belokobylskij, Sergey A.;Kula, Robert R.	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFEFFF9A1099AD17FB6494D1.text	B9118782FFEFFF9A1099AD17FB6494D1.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Alloea Haliday	<div><p>Genus Alloea Haliday</p> <p>Alloea consists of 14 described species; species richness is highest in the Eastern Palearctic and Oriental Region where 12 species have been described. Three species have been recorded in the Western Palearctic, and one is known from the Nearctic (Yu et al. 2005). Brachypterous forms are known for one species only.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B9118782FFEFFF9A1099AD17FB6494D1	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Belokobylskij, Sergey A.;Kula, Robert R.	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFE0FF951099AA87FEA39141.text	B9118782FFE0FF951099AA87FEA39141.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Alloea contracta Haliday	<div><p>Alloea contracta Haliday</p> <p>Alysia (Alloea) contracta Haliday, 1833: 265 [original description].</p> <p>Alysia (Alysia) contracta: Haliday 1838: 218 [subgeneric placement].</p> <p>Alysia contracta: Smith 1853: 31 [infrageneric placement not indicated].</p> <p>Diaspasta contracta: Foerster 1862: 265 [revised combination].</p> <p>Alloea contracta: Marshall 1894: 505 [revised combination].</p> <p>Lamadatha testaceipes Cameron, 1900: 539 [original description]. Synonymized in Morley (1909).</p> <p>Distribution. Belgium, Faeroe Islands, Germany, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Mongolia, Netherlands, Poland, Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom (Yu et al. 2005), and Russia (European part) (Tobias 1986a).</p> <p>Remarks. This species, widely distributed in the Palearctic Region, has macropterous females and brachypterous males.</p></div> 	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B9118782FFE0FF951099AA87FEA39141	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Belokobylskij, Sergey A.;Kula, Robert R.	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFE0FF951099A897FAE49051.text	B9118782FFE0FF951099A897FAE49051.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Asobara Foerster	<div><p>Genus Asobara Foerster</p> <p>Asobara, a genus of 26 described species, is represented in all zoogeographic regions (Yu et al. 2005). Two species exhibit brachyptery: A. antipoda from New Zealand (female macropterous, male brachypterous or macropterous) and Asobara subalata (Zaykov &amp; Fischer), stat. rev. from Bulgaria (female unknown, male brachypterous).</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B9118782FFE0FF951099A897FAE49051	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Belokobylskij, Sergey A.;Kula, Robert R.	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFE0FF951099A992FC9997D1.text	B9118782FFE0FF951099A992FC9997D1.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Asobara subalata (Zaykov & Fischer 1982) Belokobylskij & Kula 2012	<div><p>Asobara subalata (Zaykov &amp; Fischer), stat. rev.</p> <p>Phaenocarpa subalata Zaykov &amp; Fischer, 1982: 72 [original description].</p> <p>Asobara subalata: Tobias 1986a: 147 [revised combination].</p> <p>Distribution. Bulgaria (Zaykov &amp; Fischer 1982).</p> <p>Remarks. This species is known only from the holotype male. Fischer (1993) returned it to Phaenocarpa. The first author considers it a species of Asobara based on the brachial cell of the fore wing widely open postero-distally, one of the diagnostic characters of the genus Asobara.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B9118782FFE0FF951099A992FC9997D1	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Belokobylskij, Sergey A.;Kula, Robert R.	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFE0FF951099AFEDFDAA94F5.text	B9118782FFE0FF951099AFEDFDAA94F5.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Atopandrium debilitatum (Morley 1933)	<div><p>Atopandrium debilitatum (Morley)</p> <p>Aphaereta debilitata Morley, 1933: 160 [original description]; van Achterberg 1995b: 133 [designation of lectotype]. Atopandrium debilitatum [as debilitata]: Belokobylskij 1998: 276 [revised combination].</p> <p>Atopandrium loripenne Graham, 1952: 20 [original description]. Synonymized in van Achterberg (1995b).</p> <p>Trisynaldis conflucta Fischer, 1958: 13 [original description]. Synonymized in van Achterberg (1995b).</p> <p>Distribution. Austria, former Czechoslovakia, Germany, Hungary, Japan, Netherlands, Poland, Russia (European part, south of the Far East), Spain, and United Kingdom (Yu et al. 2005).</p> <p>Remarks. This species is rarely collected but, like its host, is widely distributed in the Palearctic Region. Males have the fore wing strongly narrowed with much reduced wing venation; the hind wing is strongly shortened. Females are macropterous.</p></div> 	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B9118782FFE0FF951099AFEDFDAA94F5	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Belokobylskij, Sergey A.;Kula, Robert R.	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFE0FF951099AF12FE8696D6.text	B9118782FFE0FF951099AF12FE8696D6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Atopandrium Graham	<div><p>Genus Atopandrium Graham</p> <p>Atopandrium Graham is a monotypic genus represented in the Palearctic Region only. The only included species is a parasitoid of Scatella stagnalis Fallén (Ephydridae), a shore fly found throughout the Holarctic Region (Suh &amp; Kwon 2006).</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B9118782FFE0FF951099AF12FE8696D6	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Belokobylskij, Sergey A.;Kula, Robert R.	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFE1FF941099AB5AFC369170.text	B9118782FFE1FF941099AB5AFC369170.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Chasmodon acares van Achterberg 1975	<div><p>Chasmodon acares van Achterberg</p> <p>Chasmodon acares van Achterberg, 1975: 74 [original description].</p> <p>Distribution. Netherlands (van Achterberg 1975). Remarks. This species is known from the holotype female only.</p></div> 	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B9118782FFE1FF941099AB5AFC369170	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Belokobylskij, Sergey A.;Kula, Robert R.	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFE1FF941099A874FAF19770.text	B9118782FFE1FF941099A874FAF19770.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Chasmodon apterus (Nees 1812)	<div><p>Chasmodon apterus (Nees)</p> <p>(Fig. 124)</p> <p>Bassus apterus Nees, (1812) 1814: 207 [original description].</p> <p>Alysia aptera: Nees (1818) 1819: 309 [revised combination].</p> <p>Alysia (Chasmodon) aptera: Haliday 1838: 214 [subgeneric placement].</p> <p>Chasmodon apterus: Blanchard 1840: 345 [revised combination].</p> <p>Chaenon apterus Curtis, 1829: 289 [original description]. Synonymized in Marshall (1872).</p> <p>Distribution. Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, former Czechoslovakia, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Latvia, Moldova, Netherlands, Poland, Russia (European part, Western Siberia), Sweden, Switzerland, Ukraine, and United Kingdom (Yu et al. 2005).</p> <p>Remarks. This species is widely distributed in Europe and also occurs in western Siberia (Novosibirsk).</p></div> 	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B9118782FFE1FF941099A874FAF19770	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Belokobylskij, Sergey A.;Kula, Robert R.	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFE1FF941099AA87FE1F9265.text	B9118782FFE1FF941099AA87FE1F9265.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Chasmodon Haliday	<div><p>Genus Chasmodon Haliday</p> <p>Chasmodon contains two species known exclusively from the Palearctic Region. Both species are known from micropterous forms only.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B9118782FFE1FF941099AA87FE1F9265	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Belokobylskij, Sergey A.;Kula, Robert R.	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFE1FF941099AF2AFF539519.text	B9118782FFE1FF941099AF2AFF539519.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Idiasta brachyptera (Tobias 1975)	<div><p>Idiasta brachyptera (Tobias)</p> <p>Euphaenocarpa brachyptera Tobias, 1975: 307 [original description].</p> <p>Idiasta brachyptera: Wharton 1980: 44 [revised combination].</p> <p>Distribution. Mongolia (Tobias 1975).</p> <p>Remarks. Both sexes of this Central Asian species have the wings strongly shortened with reduced venation in their apical halves (S. Belokobylskij pers. obs.). The male has thickened veins and the pterostigma strongly enlarged.</p></div> 	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B9118782FFE1FF941099AF2AFF539519	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Belokobylskij, Sergey A.;Kula, Robert R.	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFE1FF941099AE73FC6D9799.text	B9118782FFE1FF941099AE73FC6D9799.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Idiasta Foerster	<div><p>Genus Idiasta Foerster</p> <p>Idiasta consists of about 38 described species and is represented in all zoogeographic regions (Yu et al. 2005). Two species exhibit brachyptery with one known from the Palearctic Region.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B9118782FFE1FF941099AE73FC6D9799	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Belokobylskij, Sergey A.;Kula, Robert R.	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFE1FF941099ACAAFF639442.text	B9118782FFE1FF941099ACAAFF639442.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Lodbrokia Hedqvist	<div><p>Genus Lodbrokia Hedqvist</p> <p>Lodbrokia contains three micropterous species each known from Poland, Sweden, and Russia (Ural Mountains) only.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B9118782FFE1FF941099ACAAFF639442	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Belokobylskij, Sergey A.;Kula, Robert R.	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFE2FF971099AA87FB999222.text	B9118782FFE2FF971099AA87FB999222.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Lodbrokia hirta Hedqvist	<div><p>Lodbrokia hirta Hedqvist</p> <p>Lodbrokia hirta Hedqvist, 1962: 99 [original description].</p> <p>Distribution. Sweden (Hedqvist 1962). Remarks. Both sexes of this species are micropterous (van Achterberg 1993).</p></div> 	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B9118782FFE2FF971099AA87FB999222	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Belokobylskij, Sergey A.;Kula, Robert R.	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFE2FF971099ABA1FE3491C1.text	B9118782FFE2FF971099ABA1FE3491C1.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Lodbrokia mariae Sterzynski	<div><p>Lodbrokia mariae Sterzynski</p> <p>(Fig. 125)</p> <p>Lodbrokia mariae Sterzinski, 1984: 813 [original description].</p> <p>Distribution. Poland (Sterzynski 1984).</p> <p>Remarks. Both sexes of this species are micropterous (Sterzynski 1984). They are incorrectly listed as apterous in Yu et al. (2005).</p></div> 	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B9118782FFE2FF971099ABA1FE3491C1	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Belokobylskij, Sergey A.;Kula, Robert R.	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFE2FF971099A91DFB8890AD.text	B9118782FFE2FF971099A91DFB8890AD.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Lodbrokia uralica Belokobylskij & Kostromina	<div><p>Lodbrokia uralica Belokobylskij &amp; Kostromina</p> <p>Lodbrokia uralica Belokobylskij &amp; Kostromina, 2011: 86 [original description].</p> <p>Distribution. Russia (Central Urals) (Belokobylskij &amp; Kostromina 2011). Remarks. This species in known only from the micropterous holotype male.</p></div> 	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B9118782FFE2FF971099A91DFB8890AD	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Belokobylskij, Sergey A.;Kula, Robert R.	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFE2FF971099AE30FA349628.text	B9118782FFE2FF971099AE30FA349628.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Panerema Foerster	<div><p>Genus Panerema Foerster</p> <p>Panerema, represented in the Palearctic Region only, contains three species (van Achterberg 1988a; Papp 2003a). Van Achterberg (1988a) stated that Aspilota pygmipunctum (Fischer) is “probably” a species of Panerema but did not transfer it to that genus. Females are known for Panerema inops Foerster (brachypterous) and Panerema fulvicornis (Haliday) (macropterous). Panerema szelenyiana (Fischer) and A. pygmipunctum were described from males only, and their position in Panerema needs to be verified.</p> <p>Prior to this study, brachypterous species of Panerema were known only from the Western Palearctic. A new species represented by a brachypterous female collected in the Kamchatka Peninsula of Russia is described below.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B9118782FFE2FF971099AE30FA349628	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Belokobylskij, Sergey A.;Kula, Robert R.	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFE2FF971099AFB6FC1E95B8.text	B9118782FFE2FF971099AFB6FC1E95B8.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Panerema inops Foerster	<div><p>Panerema inops Foerster</p> <p>Panerema inops Foerster, 1862: 263 [original description]; van Achterberg 1988a: 48 [status revised].</p> <p>Alysia (Panerema) inops: Thomson 1895: 2299 [revised combination].</p> <p>Aspilota (Panerema) inops: Stelfox and Graham 1950: 291 [revised combination].</p> <p>Aspilota inops: Fischer 1972: 390 [infrageneric placement informal].</p> <p>Distribution. Austria, former Czechoslovakia, Germany, Ireland, Netherlands, Poland, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, and former Yugoslavia (Yu et al. 2005).</p></div> 	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B9118782FFE2FF971099AFB6FC1E95B8	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Belokobylskij, Sergey A.;Kula, Robert R.	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFE2FF911099AD06FDF994E9.text	B9118782FFE2FF911099AD06FDF994E9.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Panerema kamtshatica Belokobylskij & Kula 2012	<div><p>Panerema kamtshatica Belokobylskij, sp. n.</p> <p>(Figs 97–107, 126)</p> <p>Type material. Holotype: female, Russia, “ Kamchatka, 20 km S [N] Kozyrevsk, vyrubki [cutted forest], 21.VII 1985, Belokobylskij ” (ZISP).</p> <p>Description. Female. Body length 3.30 mm; fore wing length 1.10 mm.</p> <p>Head width 1.80 times median length, 1.45 times maximum length, 1.75 times width of mesoscutum. Head behind eyes rather distinctly convex anteriorly, roundly narrowed posteriorly. Width of head at level of eyes barely wider than at level of temples. Temple as long as transverse diameter of eye. Ocelli rather small, in triangle with base 1.20 times sides. POL 1.40 times Od, 0.45 times OOL. Eyes with short and rather sparse setae, 1.30 times as high as broad. Malar space very short. Face convex, with rather distinct transverse median and rather wide depression; width of face 1.50 times median height, 1.60 times maximum diameter of eye. Clypeus convex, ventral margin weakly concave. Tentorial pits small. Mandible almost parallel-sided, length 1.65 times maximum width. Upper tooth rather large, distinctly narrowed toward apex, rounded apically. Median tooth not long, rather narrow, straight, pointed apically. Notch between upper and median teeth deep and pointed-angled. Lower tooth short, wide, widely rounded apically.</p> <p>Antenna rather thick, weakly setiform, with 23 flagellomeres, almost as long as body. First flagellomere 3.30 times longer than apical width, 1.30 times longer than second flagellomere. Penultimate flagellomere 1.80 times longer than wide, 0.45 times as long as first flagellomere, 0.85 times as long as apical flagellomere; the latter obtuse apically.</p> <p>Mesosoma weakly reduced, 1.30 times longer than high. Notauli deep and coarsely rugose-crenulate in anterior half, shallow, smooth, fused in posterior 0.25 and then following as single and shallow depression. Mesoscutum with wide, distinct, and complete marginal flange. Prescutellar depression deep, long, with long median carina, finely rugulose to smooth, 0.90 times as long as scutellum. Scutellum rather small, convex, with shallow and finely rugose transverse depression in posterior 0.20. Metanotum with short, wide, and rounded median tooth. Precoxal suture wide and deep anteriorly, but shallow and narrow posteriorly, entirely coarsely crenulate, running along entire lower length of mesopleuron. Furrow along mesopleural suture very densely and distinctly crenulate. Propodeal spiracle small.</p> <p>Wings. Fore wing reaching almost middle of first tergum, 2.60 times longer than wide. Pterostigma short and narrow. Radial vein arising from middle of pterostigma. With the following veins discernible: costal, mediocubital, first abscissa of longitudinal anal, basal, nervulus, second abscissa of medial, first radiomedial, first and basal part of second abscissa of radial. In hind wing, medial and submedial cells distinct and closed.</p> <p>Legs. Hind femur slender, claviform, 4.70 times longer than maximum width. Hind tarsus almost as long as hind tibia. Hind basitarsus 0.65 times as long as second through fifth tarsomeres combined. Second tarsomere 0.45 times as long as basitarsus, 1.20 times longer than fifth tarsomere (without pretarsus). Claws rather short and strongly curved.</p> <p>Metasoma more or less compressed laterally, almost as long as head and mesosoma combined. First tergum rather long and narrow, with strong dorsal carinae fused in basal 0.30 and then following as single carina to apex of tergum; with distinct spiracular tubercles situated shortly before middle; dorsope deep. Apical width of first tergum twice minimum width; length 1.70 times apical width. Groove between second and third terga present, but very shallow. Ovipositor weakly curved, sheath almost as long as first metasomal tergum, 0.45 times as long as hind tibia, almost as long as hind basitarsus, 0.50 times as long as mesosoma.</p> <p>Sculpture and pubescence. Head smooth, face in upper half medially finely punctate. Mesoscutum mostly smooth, median lobe widely areolate-rugose with granulation between notauli on vertical part; scutellum smooth. Mesopleuron mainly smooth. Subalar depression coarsely carinate. Metapleuron smooth anteriorly, mostly coarsely rugose-strigate. Propodeum without keels and areas, entirely coarsely rugose-areolate. Hind coxa smooth; hind femur mostly smooth, narrowly rugulose medially. First tergum distinctly and curvedly carinate. Mesoscutum glabrous, with rather short and sparse setae along notauli and laterally, with dense setose spots antero-laterally. Hind tibia with dense, not long, and semi-erect setae.</p> <p>Color. Body predominantly black, partly with reddish tint; metasoma behind first tergum reddish brown, paler ventrally. Mandible reddish brown. Antennae brownish yellow to yellowish brown, brown to dark brown in apical 0.30. Palpi yellow. Legs brownish yellow, hind tibia and tarsus faintly infuscate. Wings faintly infuscate. Pterostigma brown.</p> <p>Male. Unknown.</p> <p>Diagnosis. This new species is similar to P. inops but differs as follows: first flagellomere 1.30 times longer than second flagellomere; tentorial pits large; frontal groove very shallow; eyes with short and rather sparse setae; medial mandibular tooth long; mesoscutum with wide, distinct, and complete marginal flange; subposterior transverse depression of scutellum shallow; discoidal cell of fore wing open widely; hind femur slender; and dorsal carinae of first metasomal tergum fused in basal 0.30.</p> <p>Distribution. Russia (Kamchatka).</p></div> 	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B9118782FFE2FF911099AD06FDF994E9	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Belokobylskij, Sergey A.;Kula, Robert R.	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFE5FF901099ABD2FB1C91C5.text	B9118782FFE5FF901099ABD2FB1C91C5.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Pseudopezomachus bituberculatus (Marshall 1904)	<div><p>Pseudopezomachus bituberculatus (Marshall)</p> <p>Ischnopus bituberculatus Marshall in Mantero, (1904) 1905: 451 [original description].</p> <p>Pseudopezomachus bituberculatus: Mantero 1905: 49 [revised combination].</p> <p>Distribution. France, Italy, Serbia (Yu et al. 2005), and Croatia (Griffiths 1967). Remarks. Both sexes of this species are apterous (Mantero (1904) 1905; Griffiths 1967).</p></div> 	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B9118782FFE5FF901099ABD2FB1C91C5	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Belokobylskij, Sergey A.;Kula, Robert R.	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFE5FF901099A902FBF59775.text	B9118782FFE5FF901099A902FBF59775.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Pseudopezomachus cursitans (Ferriere 1930)	<div><p>Pseudopezomachus cursitans (Ferrière)</p> <p>Alysiella cursitans Ferrière, 1930: 398 [original combination].</p> <p>Pseudopezomachus cursitans: Masi 1933: 39 [revised combination].</p> <p>Distribution. Greece and Croatia (Griffits 1967; Yu et al. 2005). Remarks. Both sexes of this species are apterous (Ferrière 1930; Griffiths 1967).</p></div> 	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B9118782FFE5FF901099A902FBF59775	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Belokobylskij, Sergey A.;Kula, Robert R.	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFE5FF901099AE72FDDC956A.text	B9118782FFE5FF901099AE72FDDC956A.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Pseudopezomachus kasparyani Tobias	<div><p>Pseudopezomachus kasparyani Tobias</p> <p>Pseudopezomachus kasparyani Tobias, 1986a: 160 [original description].</p> <p>New material. Israel: 15 females, 1 male, Tel-Avive, National Park, 13-30.IV.1995 (A. Rasnitsyn leg.) (ZISP). Ukraine: 1 female, the Crimea, “ Turetskiy val, SZ Armyanska”, 29.V.1974 (Kasparyan leg.) (ZISP); 2 females, Kherson Province, Askania-Nova, steppe, 26 &amp; 28.V.1974 (Kasparyan leg.) (ZISP), 1 female, same locality, 9.V.1926 (S. Medvedev leg) (ZISP)</p> <p>Distribution. Azerbaijan (Tobias 1986a), Israel (new record), and Ukraine (new record).</p> <p>Remarks. The female and male of this species are apterous (Tobias 1986a; Griffiths 1967) and brachypterous</p> <p>(S. Belokobylskij pers. obs.), respectively.</p></div> 	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B9118782FFE5FF901099AE72FDDC956A	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Belokobylskij, Sergey A.;Kula, Robert R.	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFE5FF901099AA87FD199215.text	B9118782FFE5FF901099AA87FD199215.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Pseudopezomachus Mantero	<div><p>Genus Pseudopezomachus Mantero</p> <p>Pseudopezomachus contains five species and is represented only in the Palearctic Region. The placement of Pseudopezomachus villosus (Kieffer) is unclear because the original description lacks sufficient detail (Nixon 1940). Kieffer (1906) indicated that the females used for the description were in the “Collection de M. de Gaulle,” but the current location of those specimens is unknown.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B9118782FFE5FF901099AA87FD199215	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Belokobylskij, Sergey A.;Kula, Robert R.	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFE5FF901099AC7DFF72941A.text	B9118782FFE5FF901099AC7DFF72941A.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Pseudopezomachus masii Nixon	<div><p>Pseudopezomachus masii Nixon</p> <p>Pseudopezomachus masii Nixon, 1940: 102 [original description].</p> <p>Distribution. Libya (Nixon 1940).</p> <p>Remarks. The female and male of this species are micropterous and brachypterous, respectively (Nixon 1940).</p></div> 	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B9118782FFE5FF901099AC7DFF72941A	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Belokobylskij, Sergey A.;Kula, Robert R.	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFE6FF931099AE6DFA319489.text	B9118782FFE6FF931099AE6DFA319489.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Braconidae	<div><p>Key to the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous cyclostome Braconidae from the Palearctic Region</p> <p>1. Mandible tips not touching when mandibles closed, with 3 or more apical teeth; mandible straight or curved outward (Alysiinae)................................................................................................ 2</p> <p>- Mandible tips touching when mandibles closed, with 1–2 apical teeth; mandible curved inward....................... 19</p> <p>2(1). Scutellum indistinct, fused with mesoscutum. Notauli and precoxal suture absent. Mesothorax strongly reduced, distinctly shorter than prothorax and propodeum. First metasomal segment long and narrow. – Ovipositor not longer than first metasomal tergum, slightly projecting beyond apex of metasoma (Pseudopezomachus Mantero)................................ 3</p> <p>- Scutellum distinctly separated from mesoscutum. Notauli at least anteriorly and precoxal suture present. Mesothorax not reduced, longer than prothorax and propodeum. First metasomal segment rather short and more or less wide............. 6</p> <p>3(2). Hind tibia dorsally with very short and inconspicuous setae.................................................... 4</p> <p>- Hind tibia dorsally with long or very long setae.............................................................. 5</p> <p>4(3). Propodeum (lateral view) weakly convex. Head not wide, 1.50 times as wide as maximum width of mesosoma. First metasomal tergum finely and obsolete punctate-reticulate. Body mainly dark brown. Body length 1.80 mm. (Female, male).................................................................................. Pseudopezomachus masii Nixon</p> <p>- Propodeum (lateral view) distinctly convex. Head wide, 1.70 times as wide as maximum width of mesosoma. First metasomal tergum coarsely and distinctly rugose-carinate. Body mainly light reddish brown. Body length 2.00– 2.10 mm. (Female, male)...................................................................... Pseudopezomachus kasparyani Tobias</p> <p>5(3). Setae on dorsal surface of hind tibia very long, about 3.00 times longer than middle width of tibia. Head entirely smooth. Propodeum distinctly convex (lateral view). Body length 2.00 mm. (Female, male).................................................................................................. Pseudopezomachus bituberculatus (Marshall)</p> <p>- Setae on dorsal surface of hind tibia distinctly shorter, about as long as middle width of tibia. Head granulate-reticulate at least around posterior margin. Propodeum weakly convex (lateral view). Body length 2.20 mm. (Female).......................................................................................... Pseudopezomachus cursitans (Ferriere)</p> <p>6(2). Wings absent or scalelike and without venation.............................................................. 7</p> <p>- Wings more or less distinctly reduced, with at least basal venation, sometimes (Atopandrium) long but strongly narrowed…11</p> <p>7(6). Mandible with 5–7 teeth. Most of mesosoma dorsally coarsely rugose-reticulate. Temple not less than twice longer than eye. Ovipositor short, indistinct or weakly protruding behind apex of metasoma, shorter than first metasomal tergum (Lodbrokia Hedqvist)............................................................................................ 8</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B9118782FFE6FF931099AE6DFA319489	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Belokobylskij, Sergey A.;Kula, Robert R.	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFE6FF931099A8FAFCCB9752.text	B9118782FFE6FF931099A8FAFCCB9752.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Pterusa crassiceps Fischer	<div><p>Pterusa crassiceps Fischer</p> <p>Pterusa crassiceps Fischer, 1958: 14 [original description].</p> <p>Distribution. Austria (Fischer 1958).</p> <p>Remarks. This species was described from a brachypteorus male. Females are listed as brachypterous in Yu et al. (2005). Van Achterberg (1988a) mentioned that there are female specimens in HNHM “very likely conspecific with P. crassiceps,” and those specimens are likely the basis of the record. However, we regard females as unknown for this species until they are identified unequivocally.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B9118782FFE6FF931099A8FAFCCB9752	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Belokobylskij, Sergey A.;Kula, Robert R.	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFE6FF931099AA87FD269260.text	B9118782FFE6FF931099AA87FD269260.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Pterusa Fischer	<div><p>Genus Pterusa Fischer</p> <p>Pterusa, a genus with three described species known only from the Palearctic Region, contains two species that exhibit brachyptery (van Achterberg 1988a).</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B9118782FFE6FF931099AA87FD269260	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Belokobylskij, Sergey A.;Kula, Robert R.	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFE6FF931099AB67FC8391ED.text	B9118782FFE6FF931099AB67FC8391ED.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Pterusa nevae (Tobias)	<div><p>Pterusa nevae (Tobias)</p> <p>Aspilota nevae Tobias, 1986a: 159 [original description].</p> <p>Pterusa nevae [as naeva]: van Achterberg 1988a: 52 [revised combination].</p> <p>Distribution. Russia (northwest of European part) (Tobias 1986a).</p> <p>Remarks. This species is known only from the brachypterous holotype male. Yu et al. (2005) mistakenly regarded this species as Dinotrema naevium (Tobias 1962).</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B9118782FFE6FF931099AB67FC8391ED	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Belokobylskij, Sergey A.;Kula, Robert R.	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
