taxonID	type	description	language	source
B9118782FFCDFFB81099ACBEFCD5949F.taxon	materials_examined	Examined material. Greece: 1 female (holotype), “ Creta, Birу ”, “ Canea, 1906 ” (HNHM); 1 male (paratype), “ GR, NE-Corfu, Akr. Ekaterini, 15.5.1995, Martin Schwarz ” (BZLA).	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFCDFFB81099ACBEFCD5949F.taxon	distribution	Distribution. Greece (Crete and Corfu Islands) (Belokobylskij 2009 a).	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFCDFFB81099ACBEFCD5949F.taxon	discussion	Remarks. This species has the mesosoma highly modified with respect to transformation of its parts and reduction of several furrows as detailed in Belokobylskij (2009 a).	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFCDFFB81099AF17FF7B9520.taxon	description	(Figs 108 – 109) This genus, known from females and males of a single apterous species, was described recently from the Greek Islands (Belokobylskij 2009 a). It was separated from other genera in Achaiabraconini on the basis of the following combination of features: eyes long and sparsely setiferous, antennal sockets positioned close to each other, narrow postgenal bridge developed, antennae subclavate, mesosoma with fine postpectal carina, tarsal claws with small basal tooth, fore and mesotibiae with distinct and numerous spines, first metasomal tergum without dorsope, second and third metasomal terga entirely with long and sparse setae, and fourth through sixth terga with two rows of setae.	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFCEFFBB1099AEE6FC759436.taxon	materials_examined	New material. Tunesia: 3 females, 3 males (macropterous), 1 male (apterous) “ Hammamet, Mrezgue, coll. 24. XI. 2007 on Ficus, reared 27. XI. 2007, E. Nowakowski ” (ZISP)	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFCEFFBB1099AEE6FC759436.taxon	distribution	Distribution. Algeria, Austria, Croatia, France, Israel, Italy, Morocco, Romania, Russia (European part) (Yu et al. 2005; Belokobylskij 2009 b), and Tunesia (new record).	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFCEFFBB1099AEE6FC759436.taxon	discussion	Remarks. Males and females of this species have both macropterous and apterous forms; apterous forms have reduced mesosomal parts and smooth sutures. The distribution of this species is restricted to the West Palearctic, whereas E. hattorii, a former synonym of E. caudatus, occurs in the East Palearctic (Belokobylskij 2009 b). Kula (2011: table 1, p. 56) mistakenly listed that E. caudatus occurs in the New World and inadvertently excluded Ecphylus arcuatus Muesebeck (female macropterous, male micropterous).	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFCEFFBB1099ABA1FCA191A2.taxon	distribution	Distribution. Finland, Mongolia, and Russia (Primorsky Territory, Western Siberia, Urals, northwest of European part) (Yu et al. 2005).	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFCEFFBB1099ABA1FCA191A2.taxon	discussion	Remarks. This species, with brachypterous females and macropterous males, is widely distributed but rarely collected in the Palearctic Region (Belokobylskij 1998).	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFCFFFB41099ABEEFA919703.taxon	description	(Fig. 110)	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFCFFFB41099ABEEFA919703.taxon	materials_examined	Examined material. Bulgaria: 1 female, “ 17.4.1967, Trakija, Pesnopoi Pd., leg. A. Germanov ” (NHMW). France: 1 male, “ France, Corse, Porto Vecchio, 7.90, Boucek ” (BMNH); 1 male, “ France, Corse, Ft dom du Fango, 24.6.90, Boucek ” (BMNH). Lithuania: 1 female, “ Lithuanian SSR, Rokishskiy r-n, Bagdonishkis, 8. VII. [19] 67 g., Yakimavicius A. ” (holotype of Lituania brachyptera Jakimavicius) (ZISP). Mongolia: 1 male, “ Mongolia: Central aimak, 11 km OSO von Somon Bajanzogt, 1600 - 1700 m ,, Exp. Dr. Z. Kaszab, 1968 ”, “ Nr 1150, 26. VII. 1968 ” (HNHM). Slovenia: 1 male (neotype), “ Tolmein ”, “ Heterospilus hemipterus Thoms., det. Dr. Fahringer, m ” (NHMW).	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFCFFFB41099ABEEFA919703.taxon	description	Description. Female. Body length 2.50 mm; fore wing length 0.90 mm. Head not depressed, width 1.45 times median length, 1.40 times width of mesoscutum. Head behind eyes (dorsal view) evenly roundly narrowed. Transverse diameter of eye 1.40 – 1.50 times longer than temple (dorsal view). Ocelli small, in almost equilateral triangle. POL 1.60 times Od, 0.35 times OOL. Diameter of antennal socket almost equal to distance between sockets, almost twice distance between socket and eye. Eye with very short and sparse setae, with very shallow emargination opposite antennal socket, 1.20 times as high as broad. Malar space height 0.70 times eye height, 1.30 times basal width of mandible. Face convex, width 1.20 times eye height and 1.35 times height of face and clypeus combined. Malar suture absent. Clypeus with narrow lower flange. Hypoclypeal depression small, oval, width 0.60 times distance from edge of depression to eye, 0.35 times face width. Occipital carina complete dorsally and ventrally, distinctly joining hypostomal carina above base of mandible. Postgenal bridge narrow. Head below eyes (front view) distinctly and almost linearly narrowed. Hypostomal flange narrow. Antennae thick, filiform, with 20 flagellomeres, almost as long as body. Scape short and thick, 1.50 times longer than maximum width, about twice as long as enlarged pedicel. First flagellomere almost straight, subcylindrical, 3.80 times longer than apical width, 1.10 times longer than second flagellomere. Penultimate flagellomere about 2.50 times longer than wide, 0.60 times as long as first flagellomere, 0.90 times as long as apical flagellomere. Mesosoma neither depressed nor reduced in size, length almost twice height. Pronotum elongate, dorsally weakly convex, submedially with distinct pronotal carina; lateral portion with shallow, narrow, weakly curved, and crenulate submedian furrow. Mesoscutum distinctly and gradually roundly elevated above pronotum, maximum width of mesoscutum (dorsal view) 1.40 times median length. Median lobe of mesoscutum weakly protruding forward, convex anteriorly (dorsal view), without median furrow, anterolateral lobes of mesoscutum indistinct and obtuse. Notauli shallow, narrow, complete, crenulate. Prescutellar depression deep, with distinct median carina, smooth but with two fine and incomplete lateral wrinkles, 0.40 times as long as maximum width, 0.40 times as long as scutellum. Scutellum weakly convex, with lateral carinae. Precoxal sulcus deep, oblique, almost straight, densely rugose-crenulate, running along anterior 0.60 of lower part of mesopleuron, but becoming shallow and narrow to middle coxa. Metanotal tooth very short, wide and weakly pointed. Metapleural lobe long, wide, rounded apically. Propodeum (lateral view) evenly and roundly curved from base to apex, without lateral tubercles; propodeal spiracle small. Wings. Size of fore wing strongly reduced, reaching end of first metasomal tergum, 5.10 times longer than maximum width, 0.70 – 1.00 times as long as mesosoma. Pterostigma present, but short or sometimes very short and narrow. Radial vein arising from middle of pterostigma, with three short sections. Radial cell small. Medial, first radiomedial, and recurrent veins present but very strongly desclerotized. Brachial cell open. Nervulus short and almost interstitial. Sometimes venation present up to basal vein only. Hind wing with apical part strongly reduced, 5.70 times longer than wide, 0.90 times as long as fore wing. First abscissa of costal vein as long as distinctly sclerotized second abscissa; second abscissa 1.50 times longer than third abscissa and 0.80 times as long as fourth abscissa. Radial vein strongly desclerotized. Medial cell narrow, length 7.30 times maximum width, 0.40 times length of wing. First abscissa of mediocubital vein 0.90 times as long as second abscissa. Recurrent vein unsclerotized, straight, strongly postfurcal. Legs. Fore tibia with several slender spines in almost single line. Hind coxa with distinct basoventral tubercle, 1.50 times longer than maximum width. Hind femur slender, 4.10 – 4.30 times longer than maximum width. Hind tarsus 0.90 times as long as hind tibia. Basitarsus weakly thickened, without ventral keel, 0.55 times as long as second through fifth tarsomeres combined. Second tarsomere 0.70 times as long as basitarsus, 1.75 times longer than fifth tarsomere (without pretarsus). Metasoma 0.90 times as long as head and mesosoma combined, 2.40 times longer than maximum width. First tergum with high and narrow median area, dorsope distinct, spiracular tubercles present; tergum distinctly and almost linearly widened from base to apex. Maximum width of first tergum 2.00 times minimum width; length 0.80 – 0.90 times apical width, 1.10 times length of propodeum. Median length of second tergum 0.40 times basal width, 0.75 times length of third tergum. Combined length of second and third terga almost equal to basal width of second tergum, about 0.80 times their maximum width. Groove between second and third terga shallow, weakly and regularly curved medially and with fine break in lateral 0.25. Third tergum in basal 0.30 with very shallow, wide, and densely crenulate transverse furrow. Ovipositor sheaths weakly thickened, 0.70 times as long as metasoma, 0.95 times as long as mesosoma, 0.35 times as long as body, equal to fore wing. Sculpture and pubescence. Vertex entirely transversely strigate, sometimes partially strigate-coriaceous; frons entirely weakly transversely costulate. Face finely strigate with small reticulation, almost smooth medially; temple smooth in anterior half and finely vertically strigate in posterior half. Mesoscutum entirely densely granulate, with two distinct wrinkles converging posteriorly in median half. Scutellum densely granulate. Mesopleuron widely densely strigate, with fine granulation posteriorly, almost smooth along posterior margin. Metapleuron entirely and coarsely areolate-rugose. Propodeum with basolateral areas distinctly delineated by carinae, basolateral areas mostly granulate, remainder of propodeum coarsely areolate-rugose. Hind coxa densely transversely strigate in dorsal half, granulate-coriaceous to almost smooth in ventral half. Hind femur finely areolate-rugulose in distal half with fine additional strigulation on outer surface, finely coriaceous to almost smooth in half of inner surface. First tergum densely, distinctly, and almost linearly carinate, without additional rugulosity, dorsal carinae distinct, weakly convex medially and strongly convergent posteriorly. Second tergum densely carinate, almost smooth laterally. Third tergum in anterior 0.40 carinate, rest of tergum smooth. Fourth tergum anteriorly very shortly carinate. Terga posterior to tergum four entirely smooth. Vertex almost entirely with sparse, short, and semi-erect setae. Mesoscutum mostly glabrous, but with sparse, long, and semi-erect setae narrowly along notauli and in single row marginally. Metapleuron setiferous except glabrous area medially. Hind tibia dorsally with long, semi-erect setae; length of those setae 0.70 – 0.90 times maximum width of hind tibia. Color. Head mostly dark reddish brown, around eye and malar space reddish brown to yellowish brown. Mesosoma black, partially dark reddish brown, sometimes prothorax and mesonotum light reddish brown. Metasoma black, but medially reddish brown or light reddish brown. Antenna mostly reddish brown to black, scape, flagellum and two basal flagellomeres yellow to brownish yellow. Palpi yellow. Legs brownish yellow except hind coxa light reddish brown. Ovipositor sheaths mostly black, dark brown basally. Wing hyaline. Pterostigma yellow. Male. Body length 2.40 – 2.70 mm; fore wing length 1.05 mm. Head width 1.50 times median length, 1.35 times width of mesoscutum. Transverse diameter of eye 1.30 – 1.40 times longer than temple (dorsal view). POL 1.40 times Od, 0.30 times OOL. Eye 1.30 times as high as broad. Face width 1.40 times height of eye and 1.40 times height of face and clypeus combined. Hypoclypeal depression width 0.65 times distance from edge of depression to eye, 0.40 times width of face. Mesosoma length 1.80 times height. Mesoscutum weakly elevated above pronotum. Notauli shallow, wide. Scutellum distinctly convex. Wings. Fore wing reaching middle of third metasomal tergum, 4.80 times longer than maximum width, 1.10 times longer than mesosoma. Radial vein arising behind middle of pterostigma, with two short sections. Radial cell small. First radiomedial vein rather distinctly sclerotized. Recurrent vein unsclerotized and antefurcal. Medial vein distinct and straight. Brachial cell open. Nervulus short and postfurcal. Hind wing with large and wide stigmalike enlargement, 0.60 times as long as hind wing. Other veins absent except for distal part of costal vein. Hind femur 3.90 times longer than wide. Hind tarsus as long as hind tibia. Basitarsus 0.45 times as long as second through fifth tarsomeres combined. Metasoma as long as head and mesosoma combined, 2.10 times longer than maximum width. Maximum width of first tergum 2.50 times minimum width. Median length of second tergum 0.55 – 0.65 times basal width, 0.90 times length of third tergum. Groove between second and third terga without lateral breaks. Third tergum in basal 0.30 with deep and very wide densely crenulate transverse furrow. Sculpture. Vertex entirely transversely strigate, mostly with additional very fine granulation. Temple mostly smooth, partly finely rugulose-strigate in posterior 0.30. Mesoscutum without two wrinkles in medioposterior half. Scutellum widely medially smooth or almost smooth, finely granulate marginally. Propodeum with small, granulate and partly rugose basolateral areas, with long and narrow areola distinctly delineated by carinae, basal carina very short. Hind femur distinctly and densely granulate. First tergum distinctly and rather sparsely carinate and medially with fine additional rugulosity. Third tergum distinctly carinate in basal half. Fourth tergum in basal 0.20 and fifth tergum basally densely carinate. Color. Body mostly reddish brown, prothorax, mesoscutum, scutellum, and most part of second and third terga yellowish brown; sometimes body brownish yellow, partly light reddish brown, propodeum and medioanterior half of first tergum distinctly infuscate. Pterostigma light brown. Hind wing stigmalike enlargement dark brown. Otherwise similar to female.	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFCFFFB41099ABEEFA919703.taxon	distribution	Distribution. Austria, Bulgaria (new record), France (new record), Germany, Lithuania, Mongolia, Serbia, Slovenia, and Sweden (Yu et al. 2005).	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFCFFFB41099ABEEFA919703.taxon	discussion	Remarks. Comparison of the primary types of Eurybolus hemipterus Thomson, 1892 and Lituania brachyptera Jakimavicius, 1968 with the specimens from Bulgaria, France, and Mongolia revealed that all are conspecific. Thus, we consider the latter a synonym of the former. Both sexes of this species exhibit brachyptery.	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFC1FFB41099AFDAFBF89513.taxon	description	(Fig. 111)	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFC1FFB41099AFDAFBF89513.taxon	distribution	Distribution. Japan (Belokobylskij & Konishi 2001; Belokobyldskij & Maeto 2009).	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFC2FFB71099AA87FB139126.taxon	description	(Fig. 112)	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFC2FFB71099AA87FB139126.taxon	materials_examined	Examined material. Algeria: 1 female, “ Ain-Franin, Oran, 5. XII [19] 59, J. Barbier ” (MNHN). France: 1 female, “ Baran, Nice? ”, “ Museum Paris, Coll. O. Sichell 1867 ” (MNHN); 1 female, “ 312 ”, “ Brachocich (?) inconnu á Lethierry Hyeres ”, “ Museum Paris, 1919, Coll. A. De Perrin ” (MNHN). Spain: 1 female (holotype), “ E. Huesca, 10. - 12.5. [19] 78, Grasland m. Laubblumen, Söderl. [und] ” (SSM).	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFC2FFB71099AA87FB139126.taxon	distribution	Distribution. Algeria (new record), France (new record), and Spain (Belokobylskij 2001).	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFC2FFB71099AA87FB139126.taxon	discussion	Remarks. This brachypterous species was described from a single specimen (holotype female) collected in northeastern Spain (Huesca). Additional specimens in MNHN from France and Algeria expand the northern and southern limits of this species, which is currently known only from the western Mediterranean.	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFC2FFB71099AE04FE179782.taxon	distribution	Distribution. Spain (Canary Islands) (Hedqvist 1976).	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFC2FFB71099AE04FE179782.taxon	discussion	Remarks. This species is endemic to the Canary Islands. It has strongly reduced mesosomal segments, and the ocelli are virtually absent.	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFC2FFB71099AF56FCE595AB.taxon	description	(Fig. 113)	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFC2FFB71099AF56FCE595AB.taxon	distribution	Distribution. Albania, Russia (south of the European part), Spain (Yu et al. 2005), and Serbia (Belokobylskij & Zikic 2009).	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFC2FFB71099AF56FCE595AB.taxon	discussion	Remarks. This species is widely distributed but infrequently collected and occurs along the southern part of Europe from Spain to the North Caucasus. Yu et al. (2005) listed it as a subspecies of Spathius pedestris Wesmael; we follow Belokobylskij (2003) and recognize it as a species.	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFC3FFB61099A98DFB8F97B0.taxon	distribution	Distribution. Russia (Kola Peninsula) (Hellén 1957).	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFC3FFB61099A98DFB8F97B0.taxon	discussion	Remarks. Only a single specimen (holotype female) of this species is known (Hellén 1957; Tobias 1983; Koponen & Tobias 1989). Hellén (1957) did not indicate the number of specimens from which he described this species. However, it appears that the original description is based on one female. Therefore, the designation of a lectotype in Tobias (1983) is invalid because the single specimen is the holotype.	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFC3FFB61099AA87FD3E92BB.taxon	description	(Fig. 114)	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFC3FFB61099AA87FD3E92BB.taxon	distribution	Distribution. Belgium, former Czechoslovakia, Denmark, France, Germany, Hungary, Israel, Italy, Netherlands, Romania, Russia (European part), Slovenia, Spain (including Canary Islands), Switzerland, Ukraine, United Kingdom, and former Yugoslavia (Yu et al. 2005).	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFC3FFB31099ACDFFDB29078.taxon	description	(Figs 1 – 10)	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFC3FFB31099ACDFFDB29078.taxon	materials_examined	Type material. Holotype: female, France, “ Garrigues de Montpellier, H. Lavagne ”, “ Coll. F. Picard (Coll. Lichtenstein), Mus Paris 1939 ” (MNHN). Paratypes: 1 female, same labels as holotype (ZISP); 2 females, “ Coll. F. Picard (Coll. Lichtenstein), Mus Paris 1939 ” (MNHN); 1 female, Algeria, “ Museum Paris, Algerie, Bone, Coll. O. Sichel 1867 ”, “ Bone, 8. [18] 66 ” [was determined erroneously as Pambolus mirus (Ruthe)] (MNHN); 1 female, Algeria, “ Museum Paris, Coll. O. Sichel 1867 ”, “ Bone, Mars 67 ” (MNHN).	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFC3FFB31099ACDFFDB29078.taxon	etymology	Etymology. From Latin “ planus ” (flat) and “ spina ” (thorn) because flat processes are present on the propodeum of this species.	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFC3FFB31099ACDFFDB29078.taxon	description	Description. Female. Body length 2.10 – 2.60 mm. Head (dorsal view) 1.30 – 1.50 times as wide as median length, 1.60 – 1.80 times as wide as mesosoma at level of tegulae. Head behind eyes distinctly, regularly, and weakly rounded or almost linearly narrowed. Transverse diameter of eye 2.30 – 2.80 times longer than temple (dorsal view). Ocelli in equilateral triangle. POL about 1.50 times Od, 0.50 – 0.60 times OOL. Antennal sockets situated close to each other, diameter of socket 1.50 – 2.00 times distance between sockets, 0.60 – 0.80 times distance between socket and eye. Eye glabrous, with very shallow emargination opposite antennal socket, 1.20 – 1.30 times as high as broad. Malar space 0.45 – 0.50 times as high as eye, 1.30 – 1.40 times as high as basal width of mandible. Trace of malar suture present, but mostly absent. Face distinctly convex, width 1.10 – 1.15 times eye height and 1.40 – 1.70 times height of face and clypeus combined. Width of hypoclypeal depression 0.75 – 0.90 times distance from depression to eye, 0.35 – 0.40 times width of face. Occipital carina complete dorsally, joined ventrally with hypostomal carina above base of mandible. Hypostomal flange wide. Mandible thick. Head below eyes distinctly and weakly roundly narrowed (frontal view). Palpi short, maxillary palpus with 6 palpomeres, labial palpus with 4 palpomeres. Antenna rather slender, filiform, with 16 – 17 flagellomeres, 0.70 – 0.80 times as long as body. Scape with excavation in apical and outer margin, 1.70 – 2.00 times longer than maximum width. First flagellomere 3.00 – 3.50 times longer than apical width, almost as long as second flagellomere. Penultimate flagellomere 2.00 – 2.50 times longer than wide, 0.70 times as long as first flagellomere, 0.85 – 1.00 times as long as apical flagellomere; the latter weakly pointed apically and without spine. Mesosoma more or less reduced in size, length 1.80 – 1.90 times maximum height. Pronotum rather long, anterior margin weakly convex (dorsal view), pronotal keel distinct and situated submedially. Mesoscutum weakly and roundly elevated above pronotum, 0.70 – 0.75 times as long as wide. Notauli shallow or very shallow, rather wide, complete, sparsely crenulate. Prescutellar depression relatively deep, long, with three to five wrinkles, finely coriaceous or smooth. Scutellum separated, with distinct lateral carinae. Subalar depression shallow and strigose with granulation. Mesopleuron with shallow oblique submedian furrow. Precoxal suture present, distinct, crenulate, running along anterior 0.70 – 0.80 of lower part of mesopleuron. Prepectal carina distinct. Postpectal carina absent. Metapleural lower lobe rather long, wide basally and narrow toward apex, rounded apically. Propodeum regularly convex-roundly narrowed posteriorly (lateral view), with distinct, wide, more or less flat, apically subpointed lateral processes in posterior 0.30. In dorsal view, mesonotum 3.00 – 4.00 times longer than pronotum, 1.40 – 1.70 times longer than propodeum. Tegulae present. Wings. Size of wings strongly reduced, narrow, rounded apically, with 2 short marginate veins, without sclerotized areas, protruding shortly behind base of propodeum. Legs. Fore tibia without spines. Femora rather slender, without dorsal protuberance. Hind femur weakly curved in basal third, 4.30 – 4.90 times longer than maximum width. Hind tarsus 0.80 – 0.90 times as long as hind tibia. Hind tibia weakly widened posteriorly. Hind basitarsus 0.60 – 0.65 times as long as second through fifth tarsomeres combined. Second tarsomere of hind tarsus 0.50 – 0.55 times as long as basitarsus, 1.50 – 1.60 times longer than fifth tarsomere (without pretarsus). Claws weakly curved. Metasoma 1.70 – 2.00 times longer than maximum width, 1.00 – 1.20 times longer than head and mesosoma combined. First tergum distinctly widened toward small spiracular tubercles in basal 0.35, then less strongly and weakly roundly widened to apex or entirely more or less regularly widened from subbase to apex; with more or less convex and wide median area, with subparallel and widely separated dorsal carinae; length of tergum 0.85 – 0.95 times apical width, 1.20 – 1.40 times length of propodeum; apical width of tergum 2.10 – 2.40 times minimum basal width. Groove between second and third terga present but very shallow and weakly curved, sometimes almost absent medially. Median length of second tergum 0.70 – 0.80 times as long as basal width, 1.40 – 1.50 times length of third tergum. Median length of second and third terga combined 1.20 – 1.30 times basal width of second tergum, 0.75 – 0.90 times maximum width. Apical terga usually rather distinctly protruding behind third tergum. Ovipositor straight, rather slender, sheath 0.70 – 0.80 times as long as hind tibia, 0.40 – 0.50 times as long as metasoma, 0.60 – 0.80 times as long as mesosoma. Sculpture and pubescence. Vertex very densely and distinctly granulate, sometimes additionally finely transversely strigulate; frons densely granulate-rugulose; face almost entirely and distinctly densely granulate; temple entirely distinctly and densely granulate. Mesoscutum finely and densely granulate, sometimes anteriorly with rugosity, posteriorly almost smooth in narrow area. Scutellum distinctly and densely granulate. Mesopleuron finely coriaceous in upper 0.30 – 0.50, densely and more or less distinctly granulate in lower part, rarely almost entirely granulate. Propodeum almost entirely areolate-rugulose, with sparse transverse strigosity; with distinctly delineated areas; areola long, pentagonal, connected or almost connected anteriorly with base of propodeum, 1.80 – 2.20 times longer than wide. Hind coxa mostly smooth, rugose-strigate dorsally. Hind femur almost entirely and rather finely granulate. First tergum entirely distinctly and densely carinate, without additional microsculpture. Second tergum shortly or very shortly and sometimes finely carinate mediobasally, smooth on rest part. Terga posterior to second tergum entirely smooth. Vertex entirely with sparse, short and almost recumbent pale setae. Mesonotum with dense, short, semi-erect pale setae spaced widely along notauli and narrowly laterally. Fourth through sixth metasomal terga with single row of rather long semi-erect setae. Hind tibia dorsally with dense, short, and semierect setae, length of those setae 0.30 – 0.40 times maximum width of hind tibia. Color. Body predominantly brownish yellow, metasoma behind first or second tergum reddish brown. Basal 0.50 – 0.60 of antenna yellowish brown, rest of antenna rather distinctly infuscate. Palpi yellow. Legs brownish yellow. Ovipositor sheath dark brown. Male. Unknown.	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFC3FFB31099ACDFFDB29078.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis. This new species is very similar morphologically to C. elaphus in the following features: shape of hind femur; fine groove usually present between second and third terga; antennal sockets situated much closer to each other than to eye; granulation on head and mesosoma widely spaced; long areola of propodeum; and presence of flat, wide, and obtuse lateral processes. Chremylus planispinus very distinctly differs from C. elaphus in the following features: malar suture present but fine, scape short and with oblique excavation in apico-lateral side, antennae long and with more flagellomeres, antennal flagellomeres long, temple short and distinctly narrowed just behind eyes (dorsal view), mesosoma long and not high, wing size very strongly reduced, and first metasomal tergum long. Chremylus planispinus is also similar morphologically to Chremylus algecirasus Belokobylskij, n. sp., but they differ from one another as detailed below in the diagnosis for C. algecirasus.	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFC3FFB31099ACDFFDB29078.taxon	distribution	Distribution. Algeria, France.	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFC6FFAF1099A95CFD3E9126.taxon	description	(Figs 11 – 23, 116)	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFC6FFAF1099A95CFD3E9126.taxon	materials_examined	Examined material. Bulgaria: 4 females and 1 male (paratypes; brachypterous), 3 females (paratypes; macropterous) “ Bulgaria: Plovdiv Dist., env. of Rogosh village, coll. 5. VI. 1990, reared 18 - 20. VIII. 1990, A. Atanasov ”, “ Host: Larva of Cydia (Laspeyresia) pomonella (L.) (Tortricidae) ” (ZISP).	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFC6FFAF1099A95CFD3E9126.taxon	description	Description of brachypterous form. Female. Body length 2.20 – 2.30 mm. Head (dorsal view) 1.45 – 1.55 times as wide as median length, 1.40 times as wide as mesosoma at level of tegulae. Head behind eyes distinctly, regularly, and weakly roundly narrowed. Transverse diameter of eye 2.00 – 2.30 times longer than temple (dorsal view). Ocelli in triangle with base 1.10 – 1.30 times sides. POL 1.50 – 2.00 times Od, 0.70 – 0.85 times OOL. Antennal sockets situated close to each other, diameter of socket 1.70 – 2.00 times distance between sockets, 0.70 – 1.30 times distance between socket and eye. Eye with very short and sparse setae, without emargination opposite antennal socket, 1.20 times as high as broad. Malar space 0.50 – 0.55 times as high as eye, 1.20 – 1.40 times as high as basal width of mandible. Malar suture absent. Face convex, width 1.00 – 1.10 times eye height and 1.20 – 1.30 times height of face and clypeus combined. Width of hypoclypeal depression 0.70 – 0.80 times distance from depression to eye, 0.40 – 0.45 times width of face. Occipital carina coarse, complete dorsally, joined ventrally with hypostomal carina above base of mandible. Hypostomal flange rather wide. Mandible rather thick. Head below eyes distinctly and roundly narrowed (frontal view). Maxillary palpi long and with 6 palpomeres, labial palpi short and with 4 palpomeres. Antenna rather slender, filiform, with 17 flagellomeres, 0.80 times as long as body. Scape with excavation in apical and outer margin, 1.60 – 1.80 times longer than maximum width. First flagellomere 3.20 – 3.50 times longer than apical width, almost as long as second flagellomere. Penultimate flagellomere 2.00 – 2.30 times longer than wide, 0.55 times as long as first flagellomere, 0.80 – 0.85 times as long as apical flagellomere; the latter obtuse apically and without spine. Mesosoma weakly reduced in size, length 1.80 – 2.00 times maximum height. Pronotum rather long, anterior margin almost straight or weakly convex (dorsal view), pronotal keel rather distinct and situated submedially. Mesoscutum weakly and roundly elevated above pronotum, 0.70 times as long as wide. Notauli very shallow, rather narrow, complete, weakly granulate with sparse and fine crenulation. Prescutellar depression relatively deep, short, with four to five wrinkles, finely or very finely granulate. Scutellum separated, with distinct lateral carinae. Subalar depression shallow and densely granulate with crenulation on narrow area. Mesopleuron without oblique submedian furrow. Precoxal suture present, rather distinct, sparsely and distinctly crenulate, running along anterior 0.50 – 0.60 of lower part of mesopleuron; additional shallow and narrow furrow covered by coarse sublongitudinal or oblique striae situated between end of precoxal suture and middle coxa. Prepectal carina distinct. Postpectal carina at least partly present. Metapleural lower lobe short, wide basally and narrow toward apex, rounded apically. Propodeum regularly convex- roundly narrowed posteriorly (lateral view), with distinct, wide, flat, apically rounded lateral processes in posterior 0.25. In dorsal view, mesonotum about 5.00 times longer than pronotum, 1.40 – 1.60 times longer than propodeum. Tegulae present. Wings. Size of wings distinctly reduced, narrow, rounded apically, reaching almost middle of metasoma. Medial, submedial, discoidal, and usually brachial cells of fore wing closed. Pterostigma present but small. Radial vein present closing radial cell. Sometimes both radiomedial veins present and small second radiomedial cell delineated by distinct veins. Parallel vein interstitial. Nervulus distinctly antefurcal. In hind wing, medial and submedial cells closed by veins. Legs. Fore tibia without spines. Femora rather slender, without dorsal protuberance. Hind femur weakly curved in basal 0.30, 3.70 – 4.20 times longer than maximum width. Hind tarsus 0.75 – 0.85 times as long as hind tibia. Hind tibia weakly widened posteriorly. Hind basitarsus 0.60 – 0.65 times as long as second through fifth tarsomeres combined. Second tarsomere of hind tarsus 0.45 – 0.55 times as long as basitarsus, 1.25 – 1.45 times longer than fifth tarsomere (without pretarsus). Claws weakly curved. Metasoma 1.40 – 1.50 times longer than maximum width, 0.85 – 0.90 times as long as head and mesosoma combined. First tergum distinctly widened toward apex, with weakly convex and rather narrow median area, with dorsal carinae not widely separated and weakly convergent posteriorly; length of tergum 0.70 – 0.80 times apical width, almost equal to length of propodeum; apical width of tergum 2.10 – 2.30 times basal width. Groove between second and third terga present, but shallow and weakly curved. Median length of second tergum 0.65 – 0.70 times as long as basal width, 1.80 – 2.00 times length of third tergum. Median length of second and third terga combined 1.10 times basal width of second tergum, 0.75 – 0.80 times maximum width. Apical terga rather shortly protruding behind third tergum. Ovipositor straight, rather slender, sheath 0.50 – 0.70 times as long as hind tibia, 0.40 – 0.50 times as long as metasoma, 0.50 – 0.60 times as long as mesosoma. Sculpture and pubescence. Vertex very densely and distinctly granulate, frons densely granulate, with fine or distinct rugulosity at least laterally or entirely; face almost entirely and distinctly densely granulate, partly with fine areolation; temple entirely distinctly and densely granulate. Mesoscutum distinctly and densely granulate, with rugosity medioposteriorly. Scutellum densely granulate. Mesopleuron finely granulate-coriaceous, almost smooth medially. Propodeum almost entirely rugose-strigate, with transverse strigation in posterior half, with fine additional granulation anteriorly; areas distinctly delineated; areola long, narrow, elongate-oval, connected anteriorly with base of propodeum, 2.50 – 3.30 times longer than wide; petiolate area narrow, long, distinctly separated. Hind coxa in dorsal half at least partly or entirely rugulose or rugose, smooth in lower half. Hind femur entirely and densely granulate, partly or entirely with rugulosity. First tergum entirely distinctly and densely carinate, without additional microsculpture. Second tergum smooth. Terga posterior to second tergum entirely smooth. Vertex entirely with rather dense, short, and semi-erect pale setae. Mesonotum with dense, short, and semi-erect pale setae spaced rather narrowly along notauli and laterally. Fourth through sixth metasomal terga with single row of short semi-erect setae. Hind tibia dorsally with dense, short or very short, and semi-erect setae, length of those setae 0.25 – 0.30 times as long as maximum width of hind tibia. Color. Body brownish yellow except head slightly darker, metasoma behind first tergum yellowish, but dark brown apically. Basal 0.70 of antenna yellow, rest of antenna yellowish brown or brown. Palpi yellow. Legs brownish yellow. Ovipositor sheath brown, dark brown apically. Male. Body length 1.80 mm. Head (dorsal view) 1.40 times as wide as median length. Transverse diameter of eye 2.00 times longer than temple (dorsal view). Diameter of antennal socket 3.00 times distance between sockets. Malar space 1.10 times as high as basal width of mandible. Width of hypoclypeal depression 0.90 times distance from depression to eye. Head below eyes strongly and convex-roundly narrowed (frontal view). Vertex and frons finely granulate and partly with rugulosity; face narrow medially almost smooth. Basal segment of maxillary palpus very strongly enlarged. Scape 1.50 times longer than wide. Mesosoma length 1.70 times height. Mesoscutum 0.75 times as long as wide. Precoxal suture shallow. Mesoscutum with fine rugosity in narrow medioposterior area. Mesopleuron finely rugulose along margins, widely smooth medially. In dorsal view, mesonotum 4.20 times longer than pronotum, 2.00 times longer than propodeum. Size of wings strongly reduced, reaching end of propodeum, only with medial and submedial cells. Hind femur 3.60 times longer than maximum width. First tergum with indistinct median area, dorsal carinae distinct only basally; length of tergum 0.85 times apical width, 1.20 times length of propodeum. Groove between second and third terga very fine. Median length of second tergum 1.60 times length of third tergum. Median length of second and third terga combined 1.15 times basal width of second tergum, 0.70 times maximum width. Body yellow except metasoma brownish yellow. Otherwise similar to female. Description of macropterous form. Female. Body length 2.30 mm; fore wing length 1.70 mm. Head (dorsal view) 1.40 times as wide as median length, 1.30 times as wide as mesosoma at level of tegulae. POL 0.70 times OOL. Eye with very weak emargination opposite antennal socket. Mesosoma. Mesoscutum 0.80 times as long as wide. In dorsal view, mesonotum 5.50 – 6.00 times longer than pronotum, 1.80 – 2.00 times longer than propodeum. Wings. Length of fore wing 3.10 – 3.20 times maximum width. Radial cell weakly shortened; metacarp almost as long as pterostigma. Pterostigma narrow, 5.00 – 5.50 times longer than maximum width. Radial vein arising behind middle of pterostigma. First radial abscissa forming obtuse angle with second abscissa, 1.20 – 1.60 times longer than maximum width of pterostigma. Second radial abscissa 1.50 – 2.00 times longer than first abscissa, 0.45 – 0.50 times as long as weakly curved third abscissa, 1.10 times longer than first radiomedial vein. Second radiomedial cell short, weakly narrowed distally, 2.20 – 2.30 times longer than wide, 1.10 times longer than brachial cell. First medial abscissa very weakly sinuate. Recurrent vein more or less postfurcal. Mediocubital vein not curved to anal vein. Nervulus interstitial to basal vein, sometimes weakly postfurcal. Brachial cell gradually and evenly closed before recurrent vein; posterior abscissa of anal vein (behind brachial vein) present but unsclerotized. Parallel vein interstitial. Hind wing 3.80 – 4.00 times longer than maximum width. First costal abscissa 0.50 – 0.60 times as long as second abscissa. First abscissa of mediocubital vein 0.65 – 0.70 times as long as second abscissa. Recurrent vein present, very strongly desclerotized, weakly curved, weakly antefurcal. Legs. Hind femur 4.40 – 4.50 times longer than maximum width. Hind tarsus 0.90 times as long as hind tibia. Metasoma 0.80 times as long as head and mesosoma combined. First tergum with wide median area; apical width of tergum 2.50 – 2.60 times basal width. Median length of second and third terga combined 1.20 – 1.30 times basal width of second tergum. Apical terga shortly protruding behind third tergum. Ovipositor weakly downcurved, sheath 0.25 – 0.30 times as long as fore wing. Sculpture and pubescence. Frons entirely densely and more or less distinctly rugose-areolate or rugose-strigate and with fine granulation. Scutellum densely and finely areolate-coriaceous. Mesopleuron finely areolate-coriaceous, almost smooth medially. Propodeum widely rugose-strigate, with transverse strigation in posterior half and with granulation anteriorly; areola 2.00 – 2.40 times longer than wide. Color. Metasoma dark brown or dark reddish brown in apical 0.30. Basal half of antenna yellow, apical half light brown or light reddish brown. Palpi pale yellow. Hind femur light reddish brown. Ovipositor sheath pale brown, brown or faintly darkened apically. Other characters are as in brachypterous form.	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFC6FFAF1099A95CFD3E9126.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis. This species, described originally in Rhyssalus (Atanasov 1996), is transferred to Chremylus based on examination of several paratypes (both brachypterous and macropterous forms). Besides the characters listed for brachypterous C. planispinus, the macropterous form has wing venation similar to C. elaphus. Chremylus pomonellae is very similar to C. planispinus but differs as follows: mesosoma dorsally wide, face narrow (1.20 – 1.30 times height of face and clypeus combined), prescutellar depression with strong and numerous wrinkles, mesopleuron without oblique submedian furrow, postero-lateral propodeal processes short and rounded apically, hind femur wide, first tergum wide apically, second tergum smooth basally, and wing much longer.	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFC6FFAF1099A95CFD3E9126.taxon	distribution	Distribution. Bulgaria (Atanasov 1996).	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFDAFFA91099A8A5FE1D965D.taxon	description	(Figs 24 – 32, 115)	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFDAFFA91099A8A5FE1D965D.taxon	materials_examined	Type material. Holotype: female, Spain, “ Süd-Spanien, Algeciras. Simon ”, “ Pambolus rosenhaueri Ratz., det. Papp J. 1990 ” (HNHM).	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFDAFFA91099A8A5FE1D965D.taxon	etymology	Etymology. From “ Algeciras, ” type locality of the new species.	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFDAFFA91099A8A5FE1D965D.taxon	description	Description. Female. Body length 2.20 mm. Head (dorsal view) 1.30 times as wide as median length, 1.90 times as wide as mesosoma at level of tegulae. Head behind eyes distinctly, regularly, and weakly roundly narrowed. Transverse diameter of eye 2.50 times longer than temple (dorsal view). Ocelli in almost equilateral triangle. POL about twice Od, 0.80 times OOL. Antennal sockets situated close to each other, diameter of socket 1.80 times distance between sockets, 1.10 times distance between socket and eye. Eye glabrous, without emargination opposite antennal socket, 1.20 times as high as broad. Malar space 0.35 times as high as eye, about 1.50 times as high as basal width of mandible. Malar suture indeterminate. Face distinctly convex, width equal to eye height and 1.70 times height of face and clypeus combined. Width of hypoclypeal depression 0.75 times distance from depression to eye, 0.35 times width of face. Occipital carina complete dorsally, joined ventrally with hypostomal carina above base of mandible. Hypostomal flange wide. Mandible thick. Head below eyes distinctly and almost linearly narrowed (frontal view). Antenna rather slender, filiform, with 17 flagellomeres, 0.80 times as long as body. Scape with excavation in apical and outer margin, 2.00 times longer than wide. First flagellomere 3.70 times longer than apical width, slightly longer than second flagellomere. Penultimate flagellomere 2.50 times longer than wide, 0.70 times as long as first flagellomere, 0.85 times as long as apical flagellomere; the latter weakly pointed apically and without spine. Mesosoma more or less reduced in size, length 1.80 times height. Pronotum rather long, anterior margin weakly convex (dorsal view), pronotal keel distinct and situated submedially. Mesoscutum weakly and roundly elevated above pronotum, 0.80 times as long as wide. Notauli shallow, rather wide, complete, rugulose-crenulate. Prescutellar depression relatively deep, long, with median carina, rather distinctly reticulate-coriaceous. Scutellum separated, with distinct lateral carinae. Subalar depression shallow and rugose-strigate. Mesopleuron with very shallow oblique submedian furrow. Precoxal suture present, distinct, crenulate, running along anterior 0.80 of lower part of mesopleuron. Prepectal carina distinct. Postpectal carina possibly absent [obscured by legs and glue]. Metapleural lower lobe rather long, rather narrow basally, rounded apically. Propodeum (lateral view) regularly convex-roundly narrowed posteriorly, with distinct, rather narrow, subcylindrical, subpointed apically lateral processes in posterior 0.25. In dorsal view, mesonotum 3.50 times longer than pronotum, 1.70 times longer than propodeum. Tegulae present. Wings. Size of wings strongly reduced, narrow, rounded apically, with 2 short marginate veins, without sclerotized areas, protruding shortly behind base of propodeum. Legs. Fore tibia without spines. Femora more or less slender, without dorsal protuberance. Hind femur weakly curved in basal third, 4.30 times longer than maximum width. Hind tarsus 0.90 times as long as hind tibia. Hind tibia weakly widened posteriorly. Hind basitarsus 0.60 times as long as second through fifth tarsomeres combined. Second tarsomere of hind tarsus 0.50 times as long as basitarsus, 1.40 times longer than fifth tarsomere (without pretarsus). Claws weakly curved. Metasoma 1.50 times longer than maximum width, 0.80 times longer than head and mesosoma combined. First tergum distinctly and regularly widened from base to apex, with convex and wide median area, with subparallel and narrow separated dorsal carinae; length of tergum 0.80 times apical width, 1.30 times length of propodeum; apical width of tergum 2.60 times basal width. Groove between second and third terga very shallow, almost indistinct medially, weakly curved. Median length of second tergum 0.85 times as long as basal width, 1.40 times longer than third tergum. Median length of second and third terga combined 1.40 times basal width of second tergum, equal to their maximum width. Apical terga shortly protruding behind third tergum. Ovipositor straight, rather slen- der, sheath 0.70 times as long as hind tibia, 0.50 times as long as metasoma, 0.65 times as long as mesosoma. Sculpture and pubescence. Vertex very densely and distinctly granulate, with distinct additional rugosity; frons densely granulate-rugulose; face almost entirely and distinctly densely granulate with strigation, with narrow and almost smooth area medially; temple entirely distinctly and densely granulate with rugosity along carina. Mesoscutum entirely, distinctly, and densely granulate, anteriorly with rugosity. Scutellum distinctly and densely granulate. Mesopleuron granulate-coriaceous and partly with rugulosity, almost smooth on small areas. Propodeum almost entirely coarsely areolate-rugose, with dense granulation in basal half; with indistinctly delineated areas; areola irregular, indistinctly delineated, rather long, distinctly separated from base of propodeum by basal carina, about 2.00 times longer than wide. Hind coxa mostly smooth, rugose-strigate dorsally. Hind femur almost entirely and distinctly granulate-rugose. First tergum entirely distinctly and sparsely carinate, finely rugulose to smooth on narrow median part, without additional microsculpture. Second tergum distinctly carinate in medio-basal half, rest of tergum smooth. Terga posterior to second tergum entirely smooth. Vertex entirely with rather dense, short, and almost recumbent pale setae. Mesonotum with dense, short, semi-erect pale setae spaced widely along notauli and narrowly laterally. Hind tibia dorsally with dense, short, and semi-erect setae, length of those setae 0.40 times as long as maximum width of hind tibia. Color. Body predominantly brownish yellow, metasoma behind second tergum light reddish brown, reddish brown in apical 0.25. Basal 0.60 of antenna yellowish brown, rest of antenna rather distinctly infuscate. Palpi yellow. Legs brownish yellow. Ovipositor sheath brown. Male. Unknown.	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFDAFFA91099A8A5FE1D965D.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis. This new species is similar to C. planispinus but differs as follows: second tergum distinctly carinate; areola of propodeum not clearly delineated; head wider than mesoscutum; narrow, subcylindrical, subpointed apically lateral processes in posterior 0.25 of propodeum; first metasomal tergum sparsely carinate; and sculpture of mesoscutum and hind femur coarse.	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFDAFFA91099A8A5FE1D965D.taxon	distribution	Distribution. Spain.	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFDCFFA81099ACD7FADB92E8.taxon	description	(Fig. 117)	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFDCFFA81099ACD7FADB92E8.taxon	distribution	Distribution. Austria, Finland, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Kazakhstan, Moldova, Mongolia, Ukraine, United Kingdom (Yu et al. 2005), North Africa (Shenefelt 1975), and Russia (South Urals) (Kostromina 2010).	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFDDFFA81099A939FBAD977D.taxon	distribution	Distribution. Uzbekistan (Belokobylskij 1985). Remarks. This species is known only from the holotype male (apterous).	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFDDFFA81099AE4EFBB49621.taxon	description	(Fig. 118)	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFDDFFA81099AE4EFBB49621.taxon	distribution	Distribution. Kazakhstan (Tobias 1964). Remarks. This species in known only from the holotype female (apterous).	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFDDFFAB1099AD74FE20918B.taxon	distribution	Distribution. Belgium, France, Germany, Hungary, Kazakhstan, Moldova, Mongolia, Netherlands, Romania, Russia (European part, South Urals, south of the Far East), Spain, and United Kingdom (Yu et al. 2005).	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFDDFFAB1099AD74FE20918B.taxon	discussion	Remarks. This species has been recorded predominantly from some southern regions of the western and eastern parts of the Palearctic and prefers open and sunny areas. The micropterous female is very rare in collections (Belokobylskij 1986).	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFDEFFAB1099A95FFD0897BB.taxon	distribution	Distribution. Italy (Yu et al. 2005).	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFDEFFAB1099A95FFD0897BB.taxon	discussion	Remarks. This is species is brachypterous and is known only from the female from Italy. The record in Yu et al. (2005) that it occurs in Germany, based on Belokobylskij and Taeger (2001), is erroneous. Pambolus brevipennis was not mentioned in the latter publication.	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFDEFFA41099AF0FFE7092F8.taxon	description	(Figs 33 – 42, 119)	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFDEFFA41099AF0FFE7092F8.taxon	materials_examined	Type material. Holotype: female, “ Mongolia, Selenginskiy Aymak, Dulan-Khan, r. [eka] Ero-gol, step’, 3. VIII 1975, Narchuk ” [Mongolia, Selenga Aymak, Dulan-Khan, Ero-gol River, steppe, 3. VIII 1975, Narchuk] (ZISP).	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFDEFFA41099AF0FFE7092F8.taxon	etymology	Etymology. From “ Ero-gol, ” the name of the river of the type locality.	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFDEFFA41099AF0FFE7092F8.taxon	description	Description. Female. Body length 2.90 mm. Head (dorsal view) 1.40 times as wide as median length, 1.55 times as wide as mesosoma at level of tegulae. Head behind eyes strongly, regularly, and weakly roundly narrowed. Transverse diameter of eye 2.00 times longer than temple (dorsal view). Ocelli in equilateral triangle. POL 1.60 times Od, 0.60 times OOL. Antennal sockets situated rather close to each other, diameter of socket 1.20 times distance between sockets, 1.40 times distance between socket and eye. Eye with short and sparse setae, almost without emargination opposite antennal socket, 1.25 times as high as broad. Malar space 0.70 times as high as eye, 1.80 times as high as basal width of mandible. Malar suture absent. Face very weakly convex, width 1.20 times eye height and 1.15 times height of face and clypeus combined. Tentorial pits rather large, distance between pits 0.85 times distance between pit and eye. Clypeus distinctly convex, straight on ventral margin, about twice as wide as high. Hypoclypeal depression oval, width 0.70 times distance from depression to eye, 0.45 times width of face. Occipital carina coarse, complete dorsally, joined ventrally with hypostomal carina above base of mandible. Hypostomal flange wide. Mandible rather slender, distinctly twisted. Head below eyes distinctly and convex-roundly narrowed (frontal view). Antenna rather thick, filiform, with 19 flagellomeres, 0.80 times as long as body. Scape short and wide, with very distinct excavation in apical and outer margin, 1.30 times longer than wide; inner length about twice as long as outer length. First flagellomere about twice as long as apical width, almost as long as second flagellomere. Penultimate flagellomere 1.70 times longer than wide, 0.70 times as long as first flagellomere, 0.85 times as long as apical flagellomere; the latter weakly pointed apically and without spine. Mesosoma weakly reduced in size, short, length 1.50 times height. Pronotum rather short, weakly convex dorsally, with distinct pronotal keel in anterior 0.40, anterior margin of pronotum almost straight and with narrow flange (dorsal view). Mesoscutum rather highly and almost perpendicularly elevated above pronotum, marginated laterally by distinct carina, 0.80 times as long as wide. Notauli rather deep and wide anteriorly, shallow and narrow posteriorly, complete, very sparsely crenulate with coriaceous sculpture. Prescutellar depression relatively deep, long, with three high wrinkles, almost smooth, 0.50 times as long as scutellum dorsally. Scutellum weakly convex, with rather distinct lateral carinae, almost as long as basal width. Metanotal tooth distinct, but small, subpointed. Subalar depression rather deep, strigate-granulate. Mesopleural pit developed, but shallow. Furrow along mesopleural suture distinct and coarsely crenulate. Precoxal suture rather shallow, wide, oblique, sparsely and distinctly crenulate, running along anterior 0.60 of lower part of mesopleuron. Prepectal carina very wide and coarse. Postpectal carina distinct. Metapleural lower lobe long, rather wide basally, rounded apically, directed forward. Propodeum (lateral view) strongly abrupted from basal 0.40, with long, subround (in dissection), wide basally and distinctly narrowed toward apex, weakly rounded apically lateral processes in posterior 0.35. In lateral view, mesothorax (on medial line) almost equal to prothorax and propodeum. Tegulae present. Wings. Size of wings strongly reduced, wings rather wide, subpointed apically, with three short basal veins, with rather large sclerotized spot in apical 0.40, protruding shortly behind base of propodeum. Legs. Femora thick and wide, without dorsal protuberance. Hind femur not curved basally, 3.00 times longer than maximum width. Hind tibia distinctly widened posteriorly. Hind tarsus 0.90 times as long as hind tibia. Hind basitarsus 0.70 times as long as second through fifth tarsomeres combined. Second tarsomere of hind tarsus 0.40 times as long as basitarsus, 0.90 times as long as fifth tarsomere (without pretarsus). Claws distinctly curved in apical half. Metasoma 1.80 times longer than maximum width, 1.10 times longer than head and mesosoma combined. First tergum with distinct lateral tubercles in basal 0.20, strongly, almost linearly and regularly, widened from base to apex, with weakly convex and narrow median area, with subparallel and narrowly separated dorsal carinae, dorsope deep, without spiracular tubercles, spiracles situated behind middle of tergum, in basal 0.55; length of tergum 0.90 times apical width, 1.10 times length of propodeum; apical width of tergum 2.40 times minimum basal width. Groove between second and third terga absent. Median length of second and third terga combined 1.55 times basal width of second tergum, 1.10 times maximum width. Apical terga shortly protruding behind third tergum. Ovipositor straight, very short, sheath 0.55 times as long as first metasomal tergum, 0.30 times as long as hind tibia, 0.80 times as long as hind basitarsus, 0.25 times as long as mesosoma. Sculpture and pubescence. Vertex very densely and distinctly granulate; frons densely granulate, additionally distinctly transversely strigate in median 0.30 – 0.50; face entirely densely granulate with fine strigation; temple densely granulate, finely granulate-coriaceous below, with coarse short rugosity along occipital carina. Sides of propleuron carinate-rugose medially, densely granulate below and above. Mesoscutum entirely distinctly and densely granulate, with rugosity anteriorly. Scutellum rather distinctly and densely granulate. Mesopleuron entirely and densely granulate, below with rugosity. Metapleuron coarsely areolate-rugose with dense and fine granulation. Propodeum densely and distinctly granulate in basal 0.40, coarsely rugose-carinate with dense granulation at least partially in posterior 0.60; areola more or less distinctly delineated by carina, long and narrow, with short basal carina. Hind coxa entirely densely granulate. Hind femur almost entirely with small but distinct granulae. First tergum distinctly and rather densely carinate medially, without carination laterally, entirely densely granulate-coriaceous. Second tergum very finely areolate-coriaceous basally, mostly smooth. Terga posterior to second tergum smooth. Vertex almost entirely with rather dense, short, and almost recumbent pale setae. Mesonotum with rather dense, short, semi-erect pale setae spaced rather widely along notauli and narrowly laterally. Second and third terga with very sparse, short, and almost erect setae; terga posterior to third tergum each with single row of semi-erect short setae along subposterior margin. Hind tibia dorsally with dense, short, and semi-erect setae, length of those setae 0.40 – 0.45 times as long as maximum width of hind tibia. Color. Body predominantly light reddish brown, metasoma almost black on wide median part in posterior 0.30. Three basal flagellomeres of antenna light reddish brown, fourth through 13 th flagellomeres dark reddish brown to black, six apical flagellomeres yellowish brown. Palpi yellow. Legs brownish yellow. Ovipositor sheath black. Male. Unknown.	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFDEFFA41099AF0FFE7092F8.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis. This new species is very similar to P. brevipennis from Italy but differs as follows: temple long; occipital carina joined with hypostomal carina; mesoscutum rather highly and distinctly elevated above pronotum; fore wing very short, oval, and without distinct venation; first tergum long, carinate only medially and entirely densely granulate-coriaceous; and antenna dark medially. Pambolus erogolus differs from the Western Palearctic P. tricolor (Ruthe) as follows: head behind eyes weakly convex, antennal flagellomeres slenderer and short, propodeum subvertically slanted in posterior half, all femora (especially fore femur) thick, and ovipositor short.	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFDEFFA41099AF0FFE7092F8.taxon	distribution	Distribution. Mongolia.	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFD1FFA41099ABCCFB7591A1.taxon	distribution	Distribution. Italy (Sardinia) (Kieffer 1906). Remarks. Only a single specimen (holotype female) of this brachypterous species is known.	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFD1FFA71099A922FE5C94D5.taxon	description	(Figs 43 – 55, 120)	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFD1FFA71099A922FE5C94D5.taxon	materials_examined	Type material. Holotype: female, “ Kirgizia, Yu [zhnaia] okraina g. Bishkek, predgor’ia, pod kamnem, 17. X 1994, S. Ovchinnikov ” [Kyrgyzstan, south outskirts of Bishkek, foothills, under stone, 17. X 1994, S. Ovchinnikov leg] (ZISP).	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFD1FFA71099A922FE5C94D5.taxon	etymology	Etymology. In honor of the late Dr. Sergey Ovchinnikov, who collected the holotype.	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFD1FFA71099A922FE5C94D5.taxon	description	Description. Female. Body length 2.60 mm. Head (dorsal view) 1.80 times as wide as median length, 1.50 times as wide as mesosoma at level of tegulae. Head behind eyes (dorsal view) very weakly in anterior 0.30, and distinctly in posterior 0.70, roundly narrowed. Transverse diameter of eye 1.15 times longer than temple (dorsal view). Ocelli in triangle with base 1.10 times sides. POL 2.20 times Od, 0.50 times OOL. Antennal sockets situated rather widely from each other, diameter of socket equal to distance between sockets, 1.40 times distance between socket and eye. Eye with very short and sparse setae, without emargination opposite antennal socket, 1.20 times as high as broad. Malar space 0.90 times as high as eye, 1.90 times as high as basal width of mandible. Malar suture absent. Face convex, width 1.50 times eye height and 1.35 times height of face and clypeus combined. Tentorial pits rather large, distance between pits 0.80 times distance between pit and eye. Clypeus convex, almost straight on medioventral margin, about 2.50 times as wide as high. Hypoclypeal depression oval, width 0.70 times distance from depression to eye, 0.45 times width of face. Occipital carina distinct, complete dorsally, joined ventrally with hypostomal carina above base of mandible. Hypostomal flange wide. Mandible rather slender, weakly twisted. Head below eyes (front view) distinctly and roundly narrowed. Antenna rather thick, filiform, with 22 flagellomeres, almost as long as body. Scape short and wide, with very distinct excavation in apical and outer margin, 1.30 times longer than wide; inner length about twice as long as outer length. First flagellomere 2.40 times longer than apical width, as long as second flagellomere. Penultimate flagellomere 2.00 times longer than wide, 0.60 times as long as first flagellomere, 0.85 times as long as apical flagellomere; the latter obtuse apically and without spine. Mesosoma weakly reduced in size, short, length 1.50 times height. Pronotum rather short, convex dorsally, without pronotal keel, anterior margin of pronotum weakly convex and with wide flange (dorsal view). Mesoscutum highly and roundly elevated above pronotum, margined laterally by distinct carina, 0.60 times as long as wide. Notauli shallow and wide, complete, sparsely crenulate. Prescutellar depression deep, long, with three high wrinkles, finely granulate, 0.50 times as long as scutellum. Scutellum weakly convex, with distinct lateral carinae, almost as long as basal width. Metanotal tooth distinct, but short and rounded. Subalar depression shallow, narrow, strigate-granulate. Mesopleural pit distinct and elongate. Furrow along mesopleural suture distinct and finely shortly crenulate. Precoxal suture shallow, wide, oblique, sparsely crenulate, running along anterior 0.50 of lower part of mesopleuron. Prepectal carina wide and coarse. Postpectal carina rather distinct and short. Metapleural lower lobe long, wide, subpointed apically. Propodeum (lateral view) strongly abrupted from basal 0.40, with long, thick, subtriangular (in dissection), wide basally and distinctly narrowed toward apex, subpointed apically submedian lateral processes. In dorsal view, mesothorax (on medial line) about 4.00 times longer than prothorax and 1.50 times longer than propodeum. Tegulae present. Wings. Size of fore wing strongly reduced, wing oval, rounded apically, with three short basal veins, with large sclerotized spot in apical 0.40, protruding shortly behind base of propodeum. Size of hind wing very strongly reduced and apically with small sclerotized spot. Legs. Femora thick and wide, without dorsal protuberance. Hind femur evenly curved (dorsal view), not curved basally (lateral view), 3.10 times longer than wide. Hind tibia distinctly widened posteriorly. Hind tarsus 0.90 times as long as hind tibia. Hind basitarsus 0.60 times as long as second through fifth tarsomeres combined. Second tarsomere of hind tarsus 0.50 times as long as basitarsus, 1.20 times longer than fifth tarsomere (without pretarsus). Claws weakly curved in apical half. Metasoma 2.00 times longer than maximum width, 1.20 times longer than head and mesosoma combined. First tergum with short and wide lateral tubercles in basal 0.20, weakly widened basally, then strongly, almost linearly, and regularly widened to apex, with weakly convex, narrow, and parallel-sided median area, with weakly convergent dorsal carinae, dorsope deep, without spiracular tubercles, spiracles situated behind middle of tergum, in basal 0.60; length of tergum 0.70 times apical width, equal to length of propodeum; apical width of tergum 2.80 times minimum basal width. Groove between second and third terga absent. Median length of second and third terga combined 1.35 times basal width of second tergum, equal to maximum width. Apical terga distinctly protruding behind third tergum. Ovipositor weakly upcurved, rather long, sheath 1.60 times longer than first metasomal tergum, 0.70 times as long as hind tibia, 2.00 times longer than hind basitarsus, 0.70 times as long as mesosoma. Sculpture and pubescence. Vertex entirely, finely, and densely granulate, partly coriaceous; frons densely granulate, with fine carination medially and laterally; face widely smooth, with two narrow submedian vertical stripes with strigulation; temple densely granulate in upper 0.30, finely coriaceous to smooth below, with fine short rugae along carina. Sides of propleuron carinate-rugulose, with dense granulation below. Mesoscutum entirely finely and densely granulate, with very fine rugosity anteriorly, with three longitudinal wrinkles and fine rugulosity in medioposterior half. Scutellum mostly smooth, finely coriaceous laterally. Mesopleuron finely coriaceous, partly smooth. Metapleuron coarsely rugose-areolate, with dense and fine granulation anteriorly only. Propodeum finely granulate-coriaceous in basal half, coarsely strigate in apical half; areola distinctly delineated by carina, short and rather narrow, basal carina short, about as long as anterior fork of areola; petiolate area long, wide anteriorly and narrow posteriorly. Hind coxa densely carinate. Hind femur almost entirely and distinctly granulate. First tergum medially distinctly and densely carinate with very fine granulation, laterally almost smooth and partly coriaceous. Terga posterior to first tergum smooth. Vertex almost entirely with rather dense, long, and semi-erect pale setae. Mesonotum with dense, long, semi-erect pale setae spaced rather widely along notauli and narrowly laterally. Second tergum entirely and third tergum mostly with sparse, long, and almost erect setae; terga posterior to third tergum each with single row of semi-erect long setae along subposterior margin. Hind tibia dorsally with dense, short, and semi-erect setae, length of those setae about 0.50 times as long as maximum width of hind tibia. Color. Head yellowish brown, light reddish brown to reddish brown in upper 0.30. Mesosoma and first metasomal tergum yellowish brown or light reddish brown, metasomal terga posterior to third tergum black. Antenna predominantly black, brown apically, two basal segments yellowish brown. Palpi yellow. Legs predominantly yellow, hind femur yellowish brown. Ovipositor sheath black. Male. Unknown.	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFD1FFA71099A922FE5C94D5.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis. This new species is similar to P. biglumis (see description of female in Belokobylskij, 1986) but differs as follows: temple and malar space long, antenna with more flagellomeres, penultimate flagellomere long, mesoscutum laterally without depressions, propodeum obliquely slanted in posterior 0.70, first metasomal tergum short and wide, ovipositor long, mesonotum finely granulate, and propodeum mostly smooth with areolation. Pambolus ovchinnikovi also resembles P. tricolor but differs as follows: antenna dark in apical half; mesopleuron widely smooth and only partly finely coriaceous; temple finely or very finely granulate and partly with additional fine strigation; mesoscutum finely coriaceous; ovipositor upcurved; and metasoma behind first tergum with long, almost erect and rather dense setae.	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFD1FFA71099A922FE5C94D5.taxon	distribution	Distribution. Kyrgyzstan.	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFD4FFA11099AA87FE3F915A.taxon	materials_examined	New material. Poland: 1 female, “ PL, Białystok, 0.2 a, FD 49, rez. Antoniuk, 16.10. [20] 01, leg. J. Sawoniewicz ” (ZISP); 1 female, “ Poland, Rogów at Koluszki, R 288, 21.9. [19] 91, leg. J. Saw [oniewicz] ” (ZISP).	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFD4FFA11099AA87FE3F915A.taxon	distribution	Distribution. Former Czechoslovakia, Germany (Yu et al. 2005), and Poland (new record).	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFD4FFA11099AA87FE3F915A.taxon	discussion	Remarks. Micropterous females of P. tricolor are known from Central Europe only. Marshall (1885) reported three apterous females, but their identities are unconfirmed. Thus, we do not regard aptery as present in females of Pambolus at this time.	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFD4FFA11099AF02FE69954E.taxon	distribution	Distribution. Spain (Canary Islands) (Belokobylskij 1986).	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFD4FFA11099AF02FE69954E.taxon	discussion	Remarks. This species is known only from Tenerife (Belokobylskij 1986), La Gomera, and Gran Canaria Islands (Guerrero & Koponen 2000). Males are brachypterous; Guerrero and Koponen (2000) reported females but did not describe the wings.	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFD4FFA11099A868FB9897B6.taxon	description	Pambolus and Phaenodus mainly differ as follows: the females of Pambolus are always brachypterous or micropterous, and the males are always macropterous (vs. females always, and males usually, macropterous in Phaenodus); the males of Pambolus always lack the second radiomedial vein (vs. second radiomedial always present in Phaenodus); the vertex, temple, and mesopleuron are usually granulate in Pambolus (vs. usually smooth in Phaenodus). The placment of P. achterbergi in the genus Phaenodus is rather putative given complete reduction of the wing veins behind the pterostigma and overall wing size reduction in the male. However, P. achterbergi has the temple and mesopleuron smooth, conditions usually found in species of Phaenodus (Belokobylskij 1986). Therefore, the first author considers it a species of Phaenodus. Guerrero and Koponen (2000) reported P. achterbergi females, but we have not yet examined those specimens to confirm their identities.	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFD5FFA21099AA87FDA096F1.taxon	description	(Figs 56 – 66, 121)	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFD5FFA21099AA87FDA096F1.taxon	materials_examined	Examined material. Austria: 1 female, “ Ebelsb [er] g, Schiltenb [er] g, Autob. Dst. Mönchsgr., 22.7. [19] 49, leg. Hamann ” (NHMW). Finland: 1 female, “ Vammeljoki ”, “ Hellen ”, “ 3113 ” (DABH). Mongolia: 2 females (holotype and paratype), “ Mongolia, Vostochnyi [East] aymak, 60 km VSV [ENE] Bayan-Burda, g. [ora] Daerkhin-Tsagan-Obo, 3. VIII. [1] 976, Kerzhner ” (ZISP). Russia: 1 female, Chita Province, Onon District, Nizhniy Tsasuchey, pine forest, 24. VII. 1990 (A. Kotenko) (IZANU); 2 females (with longer wing), Chita Province, Kharanor, 9 VII 1963 (A. Emelyanov) (ZISP).	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFD5FFA21099AA87FDA096F1.taxon	description	Description. Female. Body length 1.90 – 2.40 mm. Head (dorsal view) 1.50 – 1.70 times as wide as median length, 1.30 – 1.60 times as wide as mesosoma at level of tegulae. Head behind eyes more or less distinctly roundly narrowed. Transverse diameter of eye 1.40 – 1.60 times longer than temple (dorsal view). Ocelli medium-sized, in triangle with base 1.10 – 1.25 times sides. POL 1.50 – 2.00 times Od, 0.40 – 0.50 times OOL. Antennal socket diameter 1.00 – 1.50 times distance between sockets, 1.50 – 2.00 times distance between socket and eye. Eye with short and sparse setae, with shallow emargination opposite antennal socket, 1.15 – 1.25 times as high as broad. Malar space 0.40 – 0.50 times as high as eye, 1.00 – 1.20 times as high as basal width of mandible. Malar suture very shallow. Face and clypeus distinctly convex, width of face 1.15 – 1.25 times eye height and 1.20 – 1.30 times height of face and clypeus combined. Hypoclypeal depression round, width 0.85 – 1.00 times distance from depression to eye, 0.40 – 0.45 times width of face. Occipital carina complete dorsally, weakly arched to ocelli medio-dorsally, joined ventrally with hypostomal carina above base of mandible. Hypostomal flange rather narrow. Head below eyes distinctly and weakly roundly narrowed (frontal view). Antenna thick, filiform, with 14 – 16 flagellomeres, 0.75 – 0.85 times as long as body. Scape rather short and thick, 1.40 – 1.70 times longer than width, 1.30 – 1.50 times longer than pedicel. First flagellomere 2.00 – 2.50 times longer than apical width, 1.00 – 1.10 times as long as second flagellomere; second flagellomere 2.00 – 2.20 times longer than width. Penultimate flagellomere 1.80 – 2.20 times longer than wide, 0.70 – 0.90 times as long as first flagellomere, 0.85 – 0.90 times as long as apical flagellomere; the latter weakly pointed apically and without spine. Mesosoma more or less reduced, length 1.70 – 1.90 times height. Pronotum rather long, convex dorsally, anterior margin weakly concave (dorsal view), pronotal keel almost absent. Mesoscutum distinctly and roundly elevated above pronotum, 0.70 – 0.85 times as long as wide. Notauli distinct, rather deep, more or less wide, complete, sparsely crenulate with granulation; fine or very fine median furrow sometimes present on median lobe. Prescutellar depression relatively deep, long, with single high median carina and often several lateral rugae, finely rugulose between rugae. Scutellum separated, with distinct lateral carinae. Subalar depression relatively deep, wide, granulate-strigate. Precoxal suture present, distinct, crenulate, running along anterior 0.50 – 0.60 of lower part of mesopleuron. Prepectal carina distinct. Postpectal carina absent. Metapleural lower lobe short, more or less wide, rounded apically. Propodeum regularly convex-roundly narrowed posteriorly (lateral view), without lateral tubercles, but with rather distinct postero-lateral carinae. In dorsal view, mesonotum 4.30 – 5.50 times longer than pronotum, 2.10 – 2.50 times longer than propodeum. Tegulae present. Wings. Size of wings more or less distinctly reduced, wings narrow, pointed or sometimes subrounded apically, with distinct venation in basal part, without sclerotized areas, protruding behind apex of propodeum, sometimes reaching apex of first tergum or (rarely) middle of metasoma. Legs. Femora more or less slender. Hind femur 4.00 – 4.70 times longer than maximum width. Hind tarsus 0.85 – 0.90 times as long as hind tibia. Hind tibia weakly widened posteriorly. Hind basitarsus with dense row of long bristles along ventral margin, 0.60 – 0.70 times as long as second through fifth tarsomeres combined. Second tarsomere of hind tarsus 0.40 – 0.45 times as long as basitarsus, 1.00 – 1.20 times longer than fifth tarsomere (without pretarsus). Claws distinctly curved. Metasoma 1.30 – 1.70 times longer than maximum width, 0.75 – 0.90 times longer than head and mesosoma combined. First tergum distinctly and rather regularly widened from base to apex, with dorsal carinae complete, widely separated, subparallel or sinuate in posterior half; length of tergum 0.70 – 0.85 times apical width, almost equal to length of propodeum; apical width of tergum 1.60 – 2.00 times basal width. Groove between second and third terga distinct and weakly curved. Second tergum with sublateral oblique furrows more or less distinct but shallow or very shallow posteriorly, curved and almost parallel to lateral margins of tergum. Median length of second tergum 0.90 – 1.10 times as long as apical width of first tergum, 1.30 – 1.60 times length of third tergum. Median length of second and third terga combined 0.65 – 0.75 times maximum width. Ovipositor straight, sheath (depending on prominence behind tip of metasoma) 0.80 – 1.40 times longer than first metasomal tergum, 0.20 – 0.45 times as long as hind tibia, 0.15 – 0.40 times as long as mesosoma. Sculpture and pubescence. Vertex densely and distinctly granulate, additionally more or less distinctly and weakly undulately strigate and rugulose, rarely vertex distinctly rugose-granulate, with short rugae along occipital carina; frons densely granulate-rugose or granulate-strigate; face distinctly and densely granulate with rugosity at least partly, narrow area smooth or almost smooth medially; temple entirely and densely distinctly granulate with rather coarse or fine areolate-rugosity. Mesoscutum entirely, distinctly, and densely granulate, often with rugosity anteriorly along notauli, finely granulate posteriorly. Scutellum finely or distinctly granulate. Mesopleuron mostly granulate-coriaceous, partially carinate, usually smooth in small submedian areas, rugose-strigate postero-ventrally. Propodeum entirely coarsely areolate-rugose, with granulation basally and (finely) between rugae; with more or less distinctly delineated areola and distinctly separated petiolate area; areola short and wide, 1.30 – 1.80 times longer than maximum width, distinctly separated from base of propodeum by more or less short basal carina. Hind femur areolate-rugose in upper half, almost smooth or sometimes finely granulate-coriaceous in lower half. First tergum rather finely and more or less densely carinate or partly carinate-rugulose, with more or less smooth or almost smooth (finely coriaceous) areas laterally, medially usually widely carinate-rugulose or sometimes only rugulose. Terga posterior to first tergum smooth, but shallowly punctate. Vertex entirely with rather dense, short, and semi-erect pale setae. Mesonotum with rather dense, short, semi-erect pale setae along notauli and laterally. Hind tibia dorsally with dense, short, and semi-erect setae, length of those setae 0.50 – 0.75 times maximum width of hind tibia. Color. Body predominantly reddish brown, sometimes light or dark reddish brown to partly black, usually prothorax, often mesopleuron, mesosternum, and mesoscutum at least partly light reddish brown or at least pale, sometimes prothorax brownish yellow; metasoma widely medially yellowish brown or at least paler than lateral parts. Antenna predominantly dark brown, two to four basal segments of antenna reddish brown or at least paler. Palpi brownish yellow or pale brown. Legs light reddish brown or yellowish brown, hind tibia pale basally. Ovipositor sheath more or less reddish brown, infuscate apically, sometimes entirely almost black. Male. Unknown.	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFD5FFA21099AA87FDA096F1.taxon	distribution	Distribution. Austria (new record), Finland (new record), Mongolia, and Russia (Chita Province) (Yu et al. 2005).	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFD5FFA21099AA87FDA096F1.taxon	discussion	Remarks. The degree of reduction in wing size tends to vary within a brachypterous species. The fore wing extends behind the apex of the propodeum in some specimens of H. minialatus from the Chita Province of Russia and Mongolian Eastern Aymak; the fore wing extends behind the apex of the first tergum or to the middle of the metasoma in other specimens from those areas. Such variation demonstrates the limitations of using reduction in wing size for species diagnostics.	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFD7FF9C1099AFF2FD18949F.taxon	description	(Figs 67 – 75)	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFD7FF9C1099AFF2FD18949F.taxon	materials_examined	Type material. Holotype: female, Russia, “ Stavropol’skiy kray, Shpakovskoe, sukhoy lug [dry meadow], 10.07.1988, Belokobylskij ” (ZISP).	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFD7FF9C1099AFF2FD18949F.taxon	description	Description. Female. Body length 2.30 mm. Head (dorsal view) 1.50 times as wide as median length, 1.50 times as wide as mesosoma at level of tegulae. Head behind eyes distinctly roundly narrowed. Transverse diameter of eye 1.60 times longer than temple (dorsal view). Ocelli small, almost in equilateral triangle. POL about 2.00 times Od, 0.40 times OOL. Antennal socket diameter almost equal to distance between sockets, 1.30 times distance between socket and eye. Eye with short and sparse setae, with very fine emargination opposite antennal socket, 1.25 times as high as broad. Malar space 0.40 times as high as eye, 1.20 times as high as basal width of mandible. Malar suture absent. Face and clypeus distinctly convex, width of face 1.10 times eye height and 1.20 times height of face and clypeus combined. Hypoclypeal depression round, width almost equal to distance from depression to eye, 0.45 times width of face. Occipital carina complete dorsally, not arched to ocelli medio-dorsally, almost joined ventrally with hypostomal carina above base of mandible. Hypostomal flange rather distinct. Head below eyes distinctly and weakly roundly narrowed (frontal view). Antenna thick, filiform, with 16 flagellomeres, 0.80 times as long as body. Scape rather short and thick, 1.40 times longer than maximum width, 1.20 times longer than pedicel. First flagellomere almost 2.00 times longer than apical width, as long as second flagellomere; second flagellomere 1.80 times longer than width. Penultimate flagellomere 1.80 times longer than wide, 0.90 times as long as first flagellomere, as long as apical flagellomere; the latter weakly pointed apically and without spine. Mesosoma more or less reduced in size, length 1.80 times height. Pronotum rather long, convex dorsally, anterior margin weakly concave (dorsal view), pronotal keel almost absent. Mesoscutum distinctly and gradually roundly elevated above pronotum, 0.85 times as long as maximum width. Notauli distinct, rather deep, more or less wide, complete, rugulose-granulate; without furrow on median lobe. Prescutellar depression relatively deep, long, with single median carina, distinctly and densely strigate-rugulose. Scutellum separated, with distinct lateral carinae. Subalar depression relatively shallow, wide, granulate-strigate. Precoxal suture present, distinct, densely crenulate-rugose, running along anterior 0.55 of lower part of mesopleuron. Prepectal carina distinct. Postpectal carina absent. Metapleural lower lobe short, more or less wide, rounded apically. Propodeum more or less regularly convex-roundly narrowed posteriorly (lateral view), without lateral tubercles and postero-lateral carinae. In dorsal view, mesonotum 4.70 times longer than pronotum, 2.30 times longer than propodeum. Tegulae present. Wings. Size of wings distinctly reduced, wings narrow, subpointed apically, with distinct venation in basal part, without sclerotized areas, reaching middle of propodeum. Legs. Femora more or less slender. Hind femur 4.10 times longer than maximum width. Hind tarsus 0.90 times as long as hind tibia. Hind tibia weakly widened posteriorly. Claws distinctly curved. Metasoma 1.70 times longer than maximum width, 0.80 times longer than head and mesosoma combined. First tergum distinctly and rather regularly widened from base to apex, with dorsal carinae widely separated, complete, weakly curved for most of length but distinctly curved apically; length of tergum 0.70 times apical width, almost equal to length of propodeum; apical width of tergum 1.80 times minimum basal width. Groove between second and third terga distinct, wide, weakly curved. Second tergum with sublateral oblique furrows shallow or very shallow posteriorly and almost parallel to lateral margins of tergum. Median length of second tergum 1.10 times longer than apical width of first tergum, 1.70 times length of third tergum. Median length of second and third terga combined 0.85 times maximum width. Ovipositor straight, sheath almost as long as first metasomal tergum, 0.30 times as long as hind tibia, 0.25 times as long as mesosoma. Sculpture and pubescence. Vertex densely and distinctly granulate, additionally with distinct areolate-rugosity, with short rugae along occipital carina; frons densely granulate, partly with fine rugulosity; face distinctly and densely granulate and partly with fine rugosity, narrow area nearly smooth medially; temple distinctly, entirely, and densely granulate with rather fine rugosity. Mesoscutum entirely, distinctly, and densely granulate, with short rugosity anteriorly along notauli, finely granulate posteriorly. Scutellum rather distinctly granulate. Mesopleuron finely granulate-coriaceous, with distinctly curved carination dorsally and postero-ventrally, smooth in submedian areas. Propodeum entirely rugose-areolate, with dense granulation basally; with rather distinctly delineated areola and unclearly separated short petiolate area; areola rather long and wide, about twice longer than maximum width, almost fused anteriorly with base of propodeum. Hind femur more or less smooth, finely rugulose-carinate dorsally. First tergum almost entirely smooth, with very fine carination or rugulosity basolaterally and along dorsal carinae. Terga posterior to first tergum smooth, without punctation. Vertex with sparse, short, and semi-erect pale setae. Mesonotum with rather sparse, short, semi-erect pale setae along notauli and laterally. Hind tibia dorsally with dense, short, and semi-erect setae, length of those setae 0.50 – 0.60 times maximum width of hind tibia. Color. Head, mesosoma mostly, and metasoma basally and apically reddish brown to dark reddish brown, prothorax almost yellow, metasoma widely medially yellowish brown. Antenna brownish yellow in basal 0.40, brown to dark brown in apical 0.60. Palpi yellow. Legs yellow basally, mostly light reddish brown, hind tibia pale basally. Ovipositor sheath dark reddish brown. Male. Unknown.	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFD7FF9C1099AFF2FD18949F.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis. This new species is very similar to H. minialatus but differs as follows: first metasomal tergum almost entirely smooth, head more strongly narrowed behind eyes, and vertex granulate and without rugulosity. Distribution. Russia (Stauropol’ Territory).	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFEAFF981099A854FE66928B.taxon	description	(Figs 76 – 86, 122)	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFEAFF981099A854FE66928B.taxon	materials_examined	Examined material. Morocco: 1 female, 1 male, “ Mogador (= Essaouira), Mz Escalera ”, “ Coleccion Cabrera ” (MNCN); 1 female, “ Marruecos, Mogador (= Essaouira), V- 1907, Escalera ” (MNCN). Tunisia: 1 female (lectotype), “ Tunesia ”, “ Sicierd ” (?), “ Type H. T. ”, “ B. M. Type Hym. 3. c. 243 ”, “ B. M. Type Hym. Rhogas hemipterus Marshall 1896 ”, “ hemipterus Marsh. ” (BMNH).	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFEAFF981099A854FE66928B.taxon	description	Description. Female. Body length 7.70 – 8.20 mm; fore wing length 1.50 – 2.00 mm. Head (dorsal view) 1.55 – 1.60 times as wide as median length, 1.40 – 1.50 times as wide as mesosoma at level of tegulae. Head behind eyes weakly convex in anterior half and distinctly roundly narrowed in posterior half. Transverse diameter of eye 1.00 – 1.20 times longer than temple (dorsal view). Ocelli large, in triangle with base 1.10 times sides. POL 0.90 – 1.00 times Od, 0.80 – 1.00 times OOL. Antennal socket diameter 1.70 – 2.50 times distance between sockets, 1.10 – 1.40 times distance between socket and eye. Eye with rather distinct, short, and sparse setae, with more or less distinct and wide emargination opposite antennal socket, 1.50 – 1.70 times as high as broad. Malar space 0.35 – 0.45 times as high as eye, 0.80 – 1.00 times as high as basal width of mandible. Malar suture absent. Face weakly convex, width 1.10 – 1.20 times eye height and 1.60 – 1.70 times height of face and clypeus combined. Hypoclypeal depression large and transverse, width 1.50 – 1.60 times distance from depression to eye, 0.60 times width of face. Occipital carina complete dorsally, absent ventrally and not joined with hypostomal carina. Hypostomal flange rather narrow. Mandible thick and wide basally. Head below eyes weakly and roundly narrowed (front view). Palpi short. Antenna thick, weakly setiform, with 48 flagellomeres, 0.80 times as long as body. Scape 1.40 – 1.60 times longer than maximum width. First flagellomere 1.30 – 1.50 times longer than apical width, 1.05 – 1.15 times longer than second flagellomere. Penultimate flagellomere 1.50 times longer than wide, 0.60 times as long as first flagellomere, 0.70 times as long as apical flagellomere; the latter pointed apically and without spine. Mesosoma weakly reduced in size, length 1.70 – 1.90 times height. Anterior margin of pronotum weakly convex or almost straight (dorsal view). Mesoscutum distinctly and gradually roundly elevated above pronotum, almost as long as wide; median lobe with two more or less distinct submedian longitudinal furrows and not high but distinct longitudinal median carina. Notauli rather deep, more or less narrow, complete, crenulate with rugosity. Prescutellar depression deep, rather long, with three distinct wrinkles, finely or very finely reticulate. Scutellum large, weakly convex, with high or distinct lateral carinae. Subalar depression more or less deep and coarsely rugose-carinate. Precoxal suture rather shallow, wide, coarsely rugose-reticulate, running along anterior 0.60 – 0.70 of lower part of mesopleuron. Prepectal carina coarse. Metapleural lower lobe rather long, wide, rounded apically. Propodeum almost horizontal or weakly oblique in anterior half and strongly or very strongly oblique in posterior half, submedially with thick, short, and rounded lateral corner. Tegulae present. Wings. Size of wings strongly reduced, fore wing rather narrow, with almost complete venation, sometimes with second radiomedial vein, brachial cell open apically, reaching base of metasoma. Legs. Femora rather slender. Hind femur 3.50 – 4.40 times longer than wide. Hind tarsus 0.80 times as long as hind tibia. Hind tibia more or less widened posteriorly, long (inner) spur 0.30 – 0.40 times as long as hind basitarsus. Hind basitarsus 0.55 – 0.60 times as long as second through fifth tarsomeres combined. Second tarsomere of hind tarsus 0.55 – 0.60 times as long as basitarsus, 1.10 – 1.40 times longer than fifth tarsomere (without pretarsus). Claws wide, distinctly curved, with four to five distinct, slender, and pale spines. Metasoma. First three terga almost as long as head and mesosoma combined. First tergum thick (lateral view), highly convex in basal 0.30, strongly and almost linearly widened basally before dorsope, then weakly, evenly, and linearly widened toward posterior margin; with small and wide subbasal processes opposite dorsope, with more or less distinctly delineated, rather wide, and almost pointed posteriorly basal triangle area, with more or less high median carina and lateral carinae usually distinct and divergent posteriorly; length of tergum 1.10 – 1.20 times apical width, 1.60 – 1.90 times length of propodeum; apical width of tergum 1.50 – 1.60 times width at level of dorsope and 2.80 – 3.20 times minimum basal width. Groove between second and third terga distinct, shallow, weakly curved. Second tergum with high and complete median carina; median length of tergum almost as long as basal width, 0.80 – 0.85 times as long as apical width, 1.20 – 1.30 times longer than third tergum. Third tergum without or sometimes with rather fine median carina in basal half. Median length of second and third terga combined 1.70 – 1.80 times basal width of second tergum, 1.40 – 1.50 times maximum width. Apical terga not or sometimes weakly protruding behind third tergum. Ovipositor straight, sheath 0.50 – 0.80 times as long as hind basitarsus. Sculpture and pubescence. Vertex and frons densely and distinctly or coarsely undulately strigate and with usually coarse rugosity between strigae, areolate-rugose near ocellar triangle; face entirely areolate-rugose and with additional strigae directed from middle to latero-ventral; temple coarsely rugose-strigate. Mesoscutum and scutellum distinctly and densely rugose-areolate. Meso- and metapleuron entirely coarsely and densely rugose-areolate. Propodeum entirely coarsely rugulose-areolate, with distinct and complete undulate longitudinal median carina. Hind coxa densely rugose-areolate dorsally, densely and distinctly punctate or rugose-punctate laterally. Hind femur entirely very densely and distinctly punctate. First and second terga entirely coarsely undulately carinate with rugosity between striae. Third tergum densely and distinctly carinate with fine rugulosity, carinulae weakly directed to middle line of tergum, sometimes apically tergum rugose-areolate with several subtransverse wrinkles. Vertex entirely with dense, short, and semi-erect pale setae. Mesonotum entirely with very dense, short, and semierect yellow or whitish setae. Color. Body predominantly brownish yellow or reddish brown, mesosoma widely reddish brown or with wide brown spots, sometimes (in type) mesoscutum brownish yellow, scutellum and metanotum light reddish brown; head mostly brown or reddish brown, often yellowish brown or pale in lower 0.30 – 0.60. Scape and pedicel light reddish brown or reddish brown, flagellum mostly yellow or reddish brown, dark in apical 0.20. Palpi yellow, more or less dark basally. Legs predominantly brownish yellow or partly light reddish brown, trochanters usually yellow, all femora and sometimes coxae dark brown or dark reddish brown and with pale apex. Wings infuscate. Ovipositor sheath yellowish brown or light brown in basal 0.20 – 0.50 and black in apical 0.50 – 0.80. Male (first record). Body length 8.00 mm; fore wing length 6.30 mm. Transverse diameter of eye 1.40 times longer than temple (dorsal view). POL 0.70 times Od. Malar space 0.30 times as high as eye, 0.70 times as high as basal width of mandible. Face width equal to eye height and 1.50 times height of face and clypeus combined. Hypoclypeal depression width almost 2.00 times distance from depression to eye, 0.55 times width of face. First flagellomere of antenna 1.70 times longer than apical width, 1.30 times longer than second flagellomere. Mesosoma not reduced in size, length 1.75 times maximum height. Mesoscutum and lower part of mesosoma yellow. Median lobe of mesoscutum only with rather distinct median longitudinal keel. Prescutellar depression with five wrinkles. Precoxal suture shallow, running along anterior 0.70 of lower part of mesopleuron. Propodeum distinctly, but not strongly, oblique in posterior half. Size of wings not reduced. Fore wing long, about 3.00 times longer than maximum width. Radial cell weakly shortened. Metacarp 1.20 times longer than pterostigma. Pterostigma brown, pale basally. Second abscissa of radial vein 3.30 times longer than first abscissa, 0.60 times as long as third abscissa, 1.40 times longer than first radiomedial vein. Second radiomedial cell narrowed distally, 2.00 times longer than maximum width, almost as long as brachial cell. Recurrent vein 3.60 times longer than second medial abscissa, 0.80 times as long as first radiomedial vein. First medial abscissa distinctly sinuate. Discoidal cell 2.20 times longer than maximum width. Distance between nervulus and basal vein 2.30 times nervulus length. Hind wing about 3.50 times longer than maximum width. First abscissa of mediocubital vein 1.30 times longer than second abscissa. Radial vein distinctly widened toward apex. Hind basitarsus 0.55 times as long as second through fifth tarsomeres combined. First tergum with rather wide basal triangle area and with lateral wrinkles less distinct; length of tergum 1.30 times apical width, 1.40 times length of propodeum; apical width of tergum 1.40 times width at level of dorsope and 2.20 times basal width. Median length of second tergum 1.20 times longer than third tergum. Third tergum densely and distinctly undulately carinate with rugulosity, punctate posteriorly. Apical protruding terga smooth.	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFEAFF981099A854FE66928B.taxon	distribution	Distribution. Morocco (new record), Tunisia (Marshall 1897).	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFEAFF981099A854FE66928B.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis. The male, reported and described herein for the first time, is macropterous. This species actually belongs to the subgenus Chelonorhogas Enderlein, not the subgenus Aleiodes as indicated in Yu et al. (2005), based on the following features: hind tarsal spur long, radial cell of hind wing in male distinctly widened apically, and mesosoma without granulate sculpture.	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFEAFF981099A854FE66928B.taxon	discussion	Remarks. Yu et al. (2005) indicate that a lectotype was disgnated for Rogas hemipterus Marshall, 1897 in Papp (2003). However, Papp (2003) merely mentioned “ Female lectotype in The Natural History Museum, London (3. c. 243). ” This does not satisfy article 74.7.3 of the International Code of Zoological Nomenclature because Papp (2003) did not include an express statement of deliberate designation (International Commission on Zoological Nomenclature 1999, 2003).	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFEDFF9A1099A9BCFE68950B.taxon	description	(Figs 87 – 96, 123)	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFEDFF9A1099A9BCFE68950B.taxon	materials_examined	Type material. Holotype: female, Algeria, “ Mers-el-Kebir, Oran, 25.1. [19] 58, J. Barbier ”, “ 310 ” (MNHN). Paratype: 1 male with the same label as holotype (MNHN).	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFEDFF9A1099A9BCFE68950B.taxon	description	Description. Female. Body length 2.30 mm. Head (dorsal view) 1.50 times as wide as median length, 1.50 times as wide as mesosoma at level of tegulae. Head behind eyes distinctly and regularly roundly narrowed. Transverse diameter of eye 1.40 times longer than temple (dorsal view). Ocelli small, in triangle with base about 1.10 times sides. POL 2.30 times Od, 0.60 times OOL. Antennal socket diameter about 1.50 times as wide as distance between sockets and distance between socket and eye. Eye glabrous, with weak emargination opposite antennal socket, 1.45 times as high as broad. Malar space 0.30 times as high as eye, about 0.80 times as high as basal width of mandible. Malar suture absent. Face width 0.90 times eye height and 1.60 times height of face and clypeus combined. Width of hypoclypeal depression about 1.20 times distance from depression to eye, 0.40 times width of face. Hypostomal flange very narrow. Mandible rather large. Head below eyes distinctly and almost linearly narrowed (frontal view). Palpi rather short, maxillary palpi with five palpomeres, labial palpi with three palpomeres. Antenna rather thick, almost filiform, with 16 flagellomeres, 0.75 times as long as body. Scape 1.60 times longer than wide. First flagellomere 2.50 times longer than apical width, 1.10 times longer than second flagellomere. Penultimate flagellomere 1.60 times longer than wide, 0.65 times as long as first flagellomere, 0.80 times as long as apical flagellomere; the latter pointed apically and without spine. Mesosoma more or less reduced in size, length 1.90 times height. Pronotum rather long, with distinct pronotal keel situated submedially. Mesoscutum weakly and roundly elevated above pronotum, 0.75 times as long as wide. Notauli more or less distinct and wide in anterior half, absent posteriorly. Prescutellar depression rather deep, distinctly crenulate. Scutellum distinct, without lateral carinae. Subalar depression distinct and crenulate. Mesopleuron with shallow wide oblique submedian furrow. Precoxal suture absent. Prepectal and postpectal carinae absent. Propodeum regularly roundly narrowed (lateral view). In dorsal view, mesonotum 4.00 times longer than pronotum, 1.50 times longer than propodeum. Tegulae present. Wings. Size of wings strongly reduced, fore wing rather wide, rounded apically, with short veins, protruding shortly behind base of propodeum. Legs. Fore tibia with several slender spines. Femora rather thick, without dorsal protuberance. Hind femur 3.70 times longer than maximum width. Hind tarsus 1.15 times longer than hind tibia. Hind tibia weakly widened posteriorly. Hind basitarsus 0.50 times as long as second through fifth tarsomeres combined. Second tarsomere of hind tarsus 0.60 times as long as basitarsus, 1.10 times longer than fifth tarsomere (without pretarsus). Claws weakly curved. Metasoma 0.90 times as long as head and mesosoma combined. First tergum distinctly widened toward spiracular tubercles, then almost parallel-sided, with distinct spiracular tubercles in basal 0.30, with sub-triangular wide median area separated by shallow to very shallow furrows; length of tergum 1.30 times apical width, 0.80 times length of propodeum; apical width of tergum 1.50 times minimum basal width. Groove between second and third terga very shallow and weakly curved. Median length of second tergum 0.75 times as long as basal width, almost as long as third tergum. Median length of second and third terga combined 1.50 times basal width, 0.80 times maximum width. Ovipositor straight, sheath 1.80 times longer than hind basitarsus, 0.30 times as long as metasoma, 0.40 times as long as mesosoma. Sculpture and pubescence. Vertex smooth; frons finely coriaceous; face almost entirely and rather distinctly densely granulate; temple finely to very finely coriaceous. Mesosoma mostly densely granulate, with almost smooth areas on mesopleuron; propodeum posteriorly and metapleuron with rugosity. Hind coxa almost entirely densely granulate. Hind femur more or less smooth, granulate-coriaceous dorsally. First and second terga densely granulate, first tergum coriaceous mediobasally. Third tergum coriaceous. Terga posterior to third tergum almost smooth. Vertex with sparse, short, and semi-erect white setae in posterior 0.30. Mesonotum entirely with sparse, rather long, semi-erect white setae. Third through sixth metasomal terga with two rows of rather dense, short, semierect setae. Hind tibia dorsally with dense, rather long, and semi-erect setae, length of those setae 0.75 – 1.00 times as long as maximum width of hind tibia. Color. Body predominantly black. Scape and apical half of flagellum dark reddish brown to black, basal half of flagellum reddish brown. Palpi dark brown. Legs dark reddish brown, trochanters and basal 0.30 of tibiae reddish brown, first through fourth tarsomeres yellowish brown. Ovipositor sheath black. Male. Body length 1.90 mm. Head (dorsal view) 1.45 times as wide as median length, 1.35 times as wide as mesosoma at level of tegulae. Transverse diameter of eye 1.10 times longer than temple (dorsal view). Ocelli in triangle with base 1.20 times sides. POL about 3.00 times Od, 0.50 times OOL. Antennal socket almost as wide as distance between sockets, 1.50 times as wide as distance between socket and eye. Eye almost without emargination opposite antennal socket, 1.35 times as high as broad. Malar space about 0.60 times as high as basal width of mandible. Face width 1.20 times height of face and clypeus combined. Antenna weakly thickened toward apex, with 17 flagellomeres, 0.90 times as long as body. Scape 1.40 times longer than wide. First flagellomere 3.00 times longer than apical width, as long as second flagellomere. Penultimate flagellomere 2.50 times longer than wide, 0.85 times as long as first flagellomere, 0.90 times as long as apical flagellomere. Pronotum with fine pronotal keel situated before middle of pronotal collar. Mesoscutum 0.80 times as long as wide. Subalar depression shallow. Mesopleuron with distinct oval oblique submedian depression. In dorsal view, mesonotum 3.00 times longer than pronotum. Wings rather narrow, pointed apically. Hind femur 3.50 times longer than maximum width. Hind tarsus as long as hind tibia. Second tarsomere of hind tarsus 0.55 times as long as basitarsus, 1.15 times longer than fifth tarsomere (without pretarsus). Median length of second tergum 0.80 times as long as basal width, 1.20 times longer than third tergum. Median length of second and third terga combined 1.40 times basal width of second tergum, 0.75 times maximum width. Frons widely almost smooth medially, coriaceous laterally. Mesopleuron finely undulately strigate. Third tergum finely granulate. Otherwise similar to female.	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFEDFF9A1099A9BCFE68950B.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis. This new species is placed in the subgenus Habrobracon Ashmead based on abundant granulate sculpture on the head, mesosoma, and basal part of the metasoma. It differs from all known species of Habrobracon as follows: wings very strongly reduced, mesosoma densely and almost entirely granulate, and mesopleuron with distinct submedian depression.	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFEDFF9A1099A9BCFE68950B.taxon	distribution	Distribution. Algeria.	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFE0FF951099AA87FEA39141.taxon	distribution	Distribution. Belgium, Faeroe Islands, Germany, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Mongolia, Netherlands, Poland, Spain, Sweden, United Kingdom (Yu et al. 2005), and Russia (European part) (Tobias 1986 a).	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFE0FF951099AA87FEA39141.taxon	discussion	Remarks. This species, widely distributed in the Palearctic Region, has macropterous females and brachypterous males.	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFE0FF951099A992FC9997D1.taxon	distribution	Distribution. Bulgaria (Zaykov & Fischer 1982).	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFE0FF951099A992FC9997D1.taxon	discussion	Remarks. This species is known only from the holotype male. Fischer (1993) returned it to Phaenocarpa. The first author considers it a species of Asobara based on the brachial cell of the fore wing widely open postero-distally, one of the diagnostic characters of the genus Asobara.	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFE0FF951099AFEDFDAA94F5.taxon	distribution	Distribution. Austria, former Czechoslovakia, Germany, Hungary, Japan, Netherlands, Poland, Russia (European part, south of the Far East), Spain, and United Kingdom (Yu et al. 2005).	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFE0FF951099AFEDFDAA94F5.taxon	discussion	Remarks. This species is rarely collected but, like its host, is widely distributed in the Palearctic Region. Males have the fore wing strongly narrowed with much reduced wing venation; the hind wing is strongly shortened. Females are macropterous.	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFE1FF941099AB5AFC369170.taxon	distribution	Distribution. Netherlands (van Achterberg 1975). Remarks. This species is known from the holotype female only.	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFE1FF941099A874FAF19770.taxon	description	(Fig. 124) Bassus apterus Nees, (1812) 1814: 207 [original description].	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFE1FF941099A874FAF19770.taxon	distribution	Distribution. Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, former Czechoslovakia, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Israel, Italy, Latvia, Moldova, Netherlands, Poland, Russia (European part, Western Siberia), Sweden, Switzerland, Ukraine, and United Kingdom (Yu et al. 2005).	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFE1FF941099A874FAF19770.taxon	discussion	Remarks. This species is widely distributed in Europe and also occurs in western Siberia (Novosibirsk).	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFE1FF941099AF2AFF539519.taxon	distribution	Distribution. Mongolia (Tobias 1975).	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFE1FF941099AF2AFF539519.taxon	discussion	Remarks. Both sexes of this Central Asian species have the wings strongly shortened with reduced venation in their apical halves (S. Belokobylskij pers. obs.). The male has thickened veins and the pterostigma strongly enlarged.	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFE2FF971099AA87FB999222.taxon	distribution	Distribution. Sweden (Hedqvist 1962). Remarks. Both sexes of this species are micropterous (van Achterberg 1993).	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFE2FF971099ABA1FE3491C1.taxon	description	(Fig. 125)	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFE2FF971099ABA1FE3491C1.taxon	distribution	Distribution. Poland (Sterzynski 1984).	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFE2FF971099ABA1FE3491C1.taxon	discussion	Remarks. Both sexes of this species are micropterous (Sterzynski 1984). They are incorrectly listed as apterous in Yu et al. (2005).	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFE2FF971099A91DFB8890AD.taxon	distribution	Distribution. Russia (Central Urals) (Belokobylskij & Kostromina 2011). Remarks. This species in known only from the micropterous holotype male.	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFE2FF971099AFB6FC1E95B8.taxon	distribution	Distribution. Austria, former Czechoslovakia, Germany, Ireland, Netherlands, Poland, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, United Kingdom, and former Yugoslavia (Yu et al. 2005).	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFE2FF911099AD06FDF994E9.taxon	description	(Figs 97 – 107, 126)	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFE2FF911099AD06FDF994E9.taxon	materials_examined	Type material. Holotype: female, Russia, “ Kamchatka, 20 km S [N] Kozyrevsk, vyrubki [cutted forest], 21. VII 1985, Belokobylskij ” (ZISP).	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFE2FF911099AD06FDF994E9.taxon	description	Description. Female. Body length 3.30 mm; fore wing length 1.10 mm. Head width 1.80 times median length, 1.45 times maximum length, 1.75 times width of mesoscutum. Head behind eyes rather distinctly convex anteriorly, roundly narrowed posteriorly. Width of head at level of eyes barely wider than at level of temples. Temple as long as transverse diameter of eye. Ocelli rather small, in triangle with base 1.20 times sides. POL 1.40 times Od, 0.45 times OOL. Eyes with short and rather sparse setae, 1.30 times as high as broad. Malar space very short. Face convex, with rather distinct transverse median and rather wide depression; width of face 1.50 times median height, 1.60 times maximum diameter of eye. Clypeus convex, ventral margin weakly concave. Tentorial pits small. Mandible almost parallel-sided, length 1.65 times maximum width. Upper tooth rather large, distinctly narrowed toward apex, rounded apically. Median tooth not long, rather narrow, straight, pointed apically. Notch between upper and median teeth deep and pointed-angled. Lower tooth short, wide, widely rounded apically. Antenna rather thick, weakly setiform, with 23 flagellomeres, almost as long as body. First flagellomere 3.30 times longer than apical width, 1.30 times longer than second flagellomere. Penultimate flagellomere 1.80 times longer than wide, 0.45 times as long as first flagellomere, 0.85 times as long as apical flagellomere; the latter obtuse apically. Mesosoma weakly reduced, 1.30 times longer than high. Notauli deep and coarsely rugose-crenulate in anterior half, shallow, smooth, fused in posterior 0.25 and then following as single and shallow depression. Mesoscutum with wide, distinct, and complete marginal flange. Prescutellar depression deep, long, with long median carina, finely rugulose to smooth, 0.90 times as long as scutellum. Scutellum rather small, convex, with shallow and finely rugose transverse depression in posterior 0.20. Metanotum with short, wide, and rounded median tooth. Precoxal suture wide and deep anteriorly, but shallow and narrow posteriorly, entirely coarsely crenulate, running along entire lower length of mesopleuron. Furrow along mesopleural suture very densely and distinctly crenulate. Propodeal spiracle small. Wings. Fore wing reaching almost middle of first tergum, 2.60 times longer than wide. Pterostigma short and narrow. Radial vein arising from middle of pterostigma. With the following veins discernible: costal, mediocubital, first abscissa of longitudinal anal, basal, nervulus, second abscissa of medial, first radiomedial, first and basal part of second abscissa of radial. In hind wing, medial and submedial cells distinct and closed. Legs. Hind femur slender, claviform, 4.70 times longer than maximum width. Hind tarsus almost as long as hind tibia. Hind basitarsus 0.65 times as long as second through fifth tarsomeres combined. Second tarsomere 0.45 times as long as basitarsus, 1.20 times longer than fifth tarsomere (without pretarsus). Claws rather short and strongly curved. Metasoma more or less compressed laterally, almost as long as head and mesosoma combined. First tergum rather long and narrow, with strong dorsal carinae fused in basal 0.30 and then following as single carina to apex of tergum; with distinct spiracular tubercles situated shortly before middle; dorsope deep. Apical width of first tergum twice minimum width; length 1.70 times apical width. Groove between second and third terga present, but very shallow. Ovipositor weakly curved, sheath almost as long as first metasomal tergum, 0.45 times as long as hind tibia, almost as long as hind basitarsus, 0.50 times as long as mesosoma. Sculpture and pubescence. Head smooth, face in upper half medially finely punctate. Mesoscutum mostly smooth, median lobe widely areolate-rugose with granulation between notauli on vertical part; scutellum smooth. Mesopleuron mainly smooth. Subalar depression coarsely carinate. Metapleuron smooth anteriorly, mostly coarsely rugose-strigate. Propodeum without keels and areas, entirely coarsely rugose-areolate. Hind coxa smooth; hind femur mostly smooth, narrowly rugulose medially. First tergum distinctly and curvedly carinate. Mesoscutum glabrous, with rather short and sparse setae along notauli and laterally, with dense setose spots antero-laterally. Hind tibia with dense, not long, and semi-erect setae. Color. Body predominantly black, partly with reddish tint; metasoma behind first tergum reddish brown, paler ventrally. Mandible reddish brown. Antennae brownish yellow to yellowish brown, brown to dark brown in apical 0.30. Palpi yellow. Legs brownish yellow, hind tibia and tarsus faintly infuscate. Wings faintly infuscate. Pterostigma brown. Male. Unknown.	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFE2FF911099AD06FDF994E9.taxon	diagnosis	Diagnosis. This new species is similar to P. inops but differs as follows: first flagellomere 1.30 times longer than second flagellomere; tentorial pits large; frontal groove very shallow; eyes with short and rather sparse setae; medial mandibular tooth long; mesoscutum with wide, distinct, and complete marginal flange; subposterior transverse depression of scutellum shallow; discoidal cell of fore wing open widely; hind femur slender; and dorsal carinae of first metasomal tergum fused in basal 0.30.	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFE2FF911099AD06FDF994E9.taxon	distribution	Distribution. Russia (Kamchatka).	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFE5FF901099ABD2FB1C91C5.taxon	distribution	Distribution. France, Italy, Serbia (Yu et al. 2005), and Croatia (Griffiths 1967). Remarks. Both sexes of this species are apterous (Mantero (1904) 1905; Griffiths 1967).	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFE5FF901099A902FBF59775.taxon	distribution	Distribution. Greece and Croatia (Griffits 1967; Yu et al. 2005). Remarks. Both sexes of this species are apterous (Ferrière 1930; Griffiths 1967).	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFE5FF901099AE72FDDC956A.taxon	materials_examined	New material. Israel: 15 females, 1 male, Tel-Avive, National Park, 13 - 30. IV. 1995 (A. Rasnitsyn leg.) (ZISP). Ukraine: 1 female, the Crimea, “ Turetskiy val, SZ Armyanska ”, 29. V. 1974 (Kasparyan leg.) (ZISP); 2 females, Kherson Province, Askania-Nova, steppe, 26 & 28. V. 1974 (Kasparyan leg.) (ZISP), 1 female, same locality, 9. V. 1926 (S. Medvedev leg) (ZISP)	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFE5FF901099AE72FDDC956A.taxon	distribution	Distribution. Azerbaijan (Tobias 1986 a), Israel (new record), and Ukraine (new record).	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFE5FF901099AE72FDDC956A.taxon	discussion	Remarks. The female and male of this species are apterous (Tobias 1986 a; Griffiths 1967) and brachypterous (S. Belokobylskij pers. obs.), respectively.	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFE5FF901099AC7DFF72941A.taxon	distribution	Distribution. Libya (Nixon 1940).	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFE5FF901099AC7DFF72941A.taxon	discussion	Remarks. The female and male of this species are micropterous and brachypterous, respectively (Nixon 1940).	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFE6FF931099A8FAFCCB9752.taxon	distribution	Distribution. Austria (Fischer 1958).	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFE6FF931099A8FAFCCB9752.taxon	discussion	Remarks. This species was described from a brachypteorus male. Females are listed as brachypterous in Yu et al. (2005). Van Achterberg (1988 a) mentioned that there are female specimens in HNHM “ very likely conspecific with P. crassiceps, ” and those specimens are likely the basis of the record. However, we regard females as unknown for this species until they are identified unequivocally.	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFE6FF931099AB67FC8391ED.taxon	distribution	Distribution. Russia (northwest of European part) (Tobias 1986 a).	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
B9118782FFE6FF931099AB67FC8391ED.taxon	discussion	Remarks. This species is known only from the brachypterous holotype male. Yu et al. (2005) mistakenly regarded this species as Dinotrema naevium (Tobias 1962).	en	Belokobylskij, Sergey A., Kula, Robert R. (2012): Review of the brachypterous, micropterous, and apterous Braconidae of the cyclostome lineage (Hymenoptera: Ichneumonoidea) from the Palearctic Region 3240. Zootaxa 3240 (1): 1-62, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3240.1.1, URL: https://biotaxa.org/Zootaxa/article/view/zootaxa.3240.1.1
