identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
B93DD90EFFA5FFF7FF70FC9FBF51FC74.text	B93DD90EFFA5FFF7FF70FC9FBF51FC74.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Diptilomiopinae Keifer	<div><p>Subfamily Diptilomiopinae Keifer</p><p>Diagnosis. Legs empodia deeply divided (Amrine et al. 2003).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B93DD90EFFA5FFF7FF70FC9FBF51FC74	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Khan, Eid Muhammad;Kamran, Muhammad;Alatawi, Fahad Jaber	Khan, Eid Muhammad, Kamran, Muhammad, Alatawi, Fahad Jaber (2023): A new species of the genus Diptilomiopus Nalepa and a key to diptilomiopid species (Prostigmata; Eriophyoidea; Diptilomiopidae) associated with Moraceae plant family. Zootaxa 5375 (1): 93-102, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5375.1.5, URL: https://www.mapress.com/zt/article/download/zootaxa.5375.1.5/52315
B93DD90EFFA5FFF7FF70FBE3B949FA98.text	B93DD90EFFA5FFF7FF70FBE3B949FA98.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Diptilomiopus Nalepa 1916	<div><p>Genus Diptilomiopus Nalepa</p><p>Type species: Diptilomiopus javanicus Nalepa, 1916 .</p><p>Diagnosis. Based on the Amrine et al. 2003, and Liu et al. 2019.</p><p>Prodorsal shield typically marked by a network design; both legs with genua absent, femoral and tibial setae absent in both legs, tarsal setae ft‘ on leg II absent, coxal setae 1b absent, setae 1a and 2a present, scapular tubercles can be present or absent, if present then small and placed ahead of rear shield margin, scapular setae absent.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B93DD90EFFA5FFF7FF70FBE3B949FA98	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Khan, Eid Muhammad;Kamran, Muhammad;Alatawi, Fahad Jaber	Khan, Eid Muhammad, Kamran, Muhammad, Alatawi, Fahad Jaber (2023): A new species of the genus Diptilomiopus Nalepa and a key to diptilomiopid species (Prostigmata; Eriophyoidea; Diptilomiopidae) associated with Moraceae plant family. Zootaxa 5375 (1): 93-102, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5375.1.5, URL: https://www.mapress.com/zt/article/download/zootaxa.5375.1.5/52315
B93DD90EFFA5FFF2FF70FA91BFC9FC84.text	B93DD90EFFA5FFF2FF70FA91BFC9FC84.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Diptilomiopus bahaensis Khan & Kamran & Alatawi 2023	<div><p>Diptilomiopus bahaensis sp. nov.</p><p>urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: FE416A16-CFA9-4DC5-8A1F-8EAEE34CB8C3</p><p>(Figs 1–3)</p><p>Diagnosis (Female). Prodorsal ornamentation manifest complete network of cells; central cell without median lines; small rounded scapular tubercles located ahead of rear shield margin, ventral semi-annuali with simple round microtubercles and ornamentation on coxae I–II with granules; tarsal empodium deeply divided (7 rayed on each side).</p><p>Description</p><p>Female (n = 14) Body fusiform (Figures 1D, 2 DL), 260 (240–280, including gnathosoma), 78 (69–85) wide, 68 (65–70) thick; dark yellow in life. Gnathosoma, 58 (56–60), projecting downwards, cheliceral stylets 64 (62–68), pedipalp coxal setae (ep) 2 (1–2), dorsal pedipalp genual setae (d) 3 (3–4), palp tarsal ventral setae (v) 5 (4–5). Prodorsal shield (Figure 3 AD), 35 (33–38) long, 61 (58–64) wide, frontal lobe absent; prodorsal ornamentation manifest complete network of cells; three rows of cells: 12 cells (six cells on each side) in anterior row, six cells (three cells on each side) at center row, two cells in posterior row. A central cell without median lines, median line connected with admedian and submedian lines by transverse lines at the anterior of 1/3 of prodorsal shield, small rounded scapular tubercles located ahead of rear shield margin, (sc tubercle) 27 (24–27) apart; scapular setae (sc) absent. Coxigenital region (Figure 3 GF), with 6 (5–6) semiannuli between coxae and genitalia, anterolateral setae on coxisternum І (1b) absent; coxae I and II both with granules/ ornaments, proximal setae on coxisternum І (1a) 14 (15–18), 6 (5–6) apart; proximal setae on coxisternum ІІ (2a) 45 (41–50), 24 (23–26) apart. Prosternal apodeme 5 (4–6). Leg І (Figure 3L 1) 31 (30–33); length, femur 16 (15–18), basiventral femoral setae (bv) absent; genu absent; tibia 8 (5–6), paraxial tibial setae (l‘) absent, tarsus 7 (8–11), paraxial fastigial tarsal setae long, (ft‘) 39 (36–43), antaxial fastigial tarsal setae (ft‘‘) 43 (39–47); seta (u‘) 11 (9–12), tarsal empodium (em) 7 (6–8), deeply divided, 7 rayed on each side, tarsal solenidion (ω) 7 (6–8), knobbed. Leg ІІ (Figure 3L 2), 29 (28–32), femur 16 (14–16), basiventral femoral setae (bv) absent; genu absent; tibia 5 (4–5); tarsus 8 (7–9), setae (ft‘) absent, setae (ft‘‘) 28 (26– 31) seta (u‘) 5 (5–8) tarsal empodium (e m) 8 (7–9), deeply divided, each seven rayed, tarsal solenidion (ω) 7 (6–8), knobbed (Figure 3 EM). Opisthosoma dorsally with 68 (65–73) annuli simple (Figure 2 DL); with three ridges, mid-dorsal ridge shorter than lateral ridges, ended in a wide furrow; ventrally with 78 (76–81) semiannuli, with small, rounded microtubercles; last 9–11 ventral semiannuli with elongated, linear micortubercles; lateral setae c 2 absent; setae d 31 (29–34), 50 (48–53) apart; on ventral semiannulus 29 (27–32); setae e 21 (19–24), 23 (21–25) apart; on ventral semiannulus 46 (44–49); setae f 31 (29–35), on 11th ventral semiannulus from rear, 25 (25–28) apart; accessory setae h 1 minute, setae h 2 50 (47–56) (Figure 1V). Genital coverflap: 24 (23–25), 28 (24–30) wide, genital seta (3a) 7 (6–8), 21 (19–22) apart; coverflap smooth but basal part with granules. Internal genitalia (Figure 3 IG), Spermathecae ovoid, oriented posterolaterad; spermathecal tubes relatively short; transverse genital apodeme trapezoidal, distally folded.</p><p>Etymology. The name of the new species ( bahaensis) refers to the name of the locality ‘‘Baha’’ from where the type specimens were collected.</p><p>Type material. Holotype female, and 13 paratypes female, Ficus carica L. ( Moraceae), Al-Baha, Saudi Arabia, 20°3‘50.969“N, 41°28‘26.972“E, 19 October 2019, coll. Eid M. Khan.</p><p>Relation to the host plants. Vagrant on abaxial surface of leaf. No apparent damage symptoms to the host foliage were observed.</p><p>Remarks. Diptilomiopus bahaensis sp. nov., is morphologically close to the D. racemosae (Chandrapatya and Boczek, 2001) by the presence of scapular setal position and central cells without median line. However, the new species differs from the later by the shape of ventral semi-annuali with microtubercles (simple rounded vs. spine like) and ornamentation on coxae II (with granules vs. without granules).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B93DD90EFFA5FFF2FF70FA91BFC9FC84	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Khan, Eid Muhammad;Kamran, Muhammad;Alatawi, Fahad Jaber	Khan, Eid Muhammad, Kamran, Muhammad, Alatawi, Fahad Jaber (2023): A new species of the genus Diptilomiopus Nalepa and a key to diptilomiopid species (Prostigmata; Eriophyoidea; Diptilomiopidae) associated with Moraceae plant family. Zootaxa 5375 (1): 93-102, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5375.1.5, URL: https://www.mapress.com/zt/article/download/zootaxa.5375.1.5/52315
B93DD90EFFA0FFF3FF70FC73B99AFD00.text	B93DD90EFFA0FFF3FF70FC73B99AFD00.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Diptilomiopidae Keifer Nalepa	<div><p>Key to species of the family Diptilomiopidae associated with the plant family Moraceae</p><p>1. Empodium entire................................... Subfamily Rhyncaphytoptinae ......................... 2</p><p>- Empodium deeply divided........................ Subfamily Diptilomiopinae .............................. 12</p><p>2. Coxae setae 1b absent................................. Genus Chakrabartiella C. ficusis (Chakrabarti, Ghosh &amp; Das)</p><p>- Coxae setae 1b present................................................................................. 3</p><p>3. Femoral setae absent from leg I......................... Genus Catarhinus ....................... C. mori Huang</p><p>- Femoral setae present on both legs........................................................................ 4</p><p>4. Dorsal annuli uneven, laterally irregular serrate......................... Genus Quadracus ....... Q. cudraniae Kaung</p><p>- Dorsal annuli uniformly even, laterally not serrate........................................................... 5</p><p>5. Prodorsal shield separated from 1 st dorsal annulus by deep cleft, lateral annular margin with strong pointed projection......................... Genus Peralox .............................................. P. cudraniae Kuang and Hong</p><p>- Prodorsal shield not separated from 1 st dorsal annulus; lateral annular margin not as above........................... 6</p><p>6. Dorsal annuli subequal dorsoventrally......................... Genus Rhinophytoptus ....... R. broussonetiae Kaung</p><p>- Dorsal annuli broader than ventral annuli......................... Genus Rhyncaphytoptus ...................... 7</p><p>7. Median, admedian and submedian lines incomplete............................................ R. ficifoliae Keifer</p><p>- Median, admedian and submedian lines complete............................................................ 8</p><p>8. Median and admedian are connected by transverse lines....................................................... 9</p><p>- Median and admedian are without transverse lines.......................................................... 10</p><p>9. Two transverse lines joining median and admedian lines............................... R. zhongshani Zhao &amp; Kaung</p><p>- Single transverse line joining median and admedian lines................................ R. taihangensis Xue &amp; Hong</p><p>10. Coxal areas without granules, annuli with spines like micortubercles......................... R. caricae Zhao &amp; Kuang</p><p>- Coxal areas with granules, annuli with rounded micortubercles or absent........................................ 11</p><p>11. Dorsal annul without micortubercles, h 1 present............................................ R. mori Liu &amp; Kuang</p><p>- Dorsal annuli with rounded micortubercles, h 1 absent.................................... R. papyriferae Xue &amp; Hong</p><p>12. Scapular setae present; minute in size.................................................................... 13</p><p>- Scapular setae absent................................................................................. 14</p><p>13. Genu setae absent from leg II......................... Genus Neorhynacus ....... N. lakoochii Pandir &amp; Chakrabarti</p><p>- Genu setae present on both legs......................... Genus Apodiptacus ................. A. cordiformis Keifer</p><p>14. Legs genu segment absent......................... Genus Diptilomiopus ................................... 15</p><p>- Legs genu segment present............................................................................ 27</p><p>15. Scapular setal insertion absent.......................................................................... 16</p><p>- Scapular setal insertion present......................................................................... 18</p><p>16. Female coverflap with longitudinal lines; central cell with admedian lines.............. D. ficusis Chakrabarti &amp; Mondal</p><p>- Female coverflap smooth; central cell without median and admedian lines....................................... 17</p><p>17. Female genital area anteriorly granulated; second medial row with 13 cells............... D. indicus Chakrabarti &amp; Pandit</p><p>- Female genital area anteriorly smooth; second medial row with 7 cells.................. D. ficifolius (Boczek &amp; Oleczek)</p><p>18. Central cell with median lines.......................................................................... 19 - Central cell without median lines........................................................................ 21</p><p>19. Each branch of empodium multi-rayed......................................... D. broussonetus Liu, Yuan, &amp; Xue</p><p>- Each branch of empodium 5-6 rayed..................................................................... 20</p><p>20. Leg tarsal seta (ft’, ft’’) divided................................................... D. sabahus Liu, Yuan, &amp; Xue</p><p>- Leg tarsal seta (ft’, ft’’) simple............................................................ D. ficivorus Sarkar</p><p>21. Coxal area smooth................................................................................... 22</p><p>- Coxal area granulated/punctate......................................................................... 23</p><p>22. Second row of mid shield with 5 cells; genital area with few granules.............................. D. cumingis Huang</p><p>- Second row of mid shield with 3 cells; genital area entirely smooth...................... D. asperis Gosh &amp; Chakrabarti</p><p>23. Genital shield entirely smooth........................................... D. benjaminae (Boczek &amp; Chandrapatya)</p><p>- Genital shield granulated.............................................................................. 24</p><p>24. Dorsal annulai smooth................................................................................ 25</p><p>- Dorsal annulai with pointed micortubercles................................................................ 26</p><p>25. Only coxae I granulated,................................................ D. racemosae (Chandrapatya &amp; Boczek)</p><p>- Both coxae granulated................................................... D. bahaensis sp. nov. Alatawi &amp; Khan</p><p>26. Setae h 1 absent; empodium 6 rayed................................... D. indogangeticus Chakrabarti, Sur, &amp; Sarkar</p><p>- Setae h 1 present; empodium 8 rayed............................................................ D. ficus Attiah</p><p>27. All coxal setae present......................... Genus Asetadiptacus ........................ A. emiliae Carmona</p><p>- Coxal setae 1b absent......................... Genus Vimola .................... V. artocarpae (Mohanasundaram)</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B93DD90EFFA0FFF3FF70FC73B99AFD00	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Khan, Eid Muhammad;Kamran, Muhammad;Alatawi, Fahad Jaber	Khan, Eid Muhammad, Kamran, Muhammad, Alatawi, Fahad Jaber (2023): A new species of the genus Diptilomiopus Nalepa and a key to diptilomiopid species (Prostigmata; Eriophyoidea; Diptilomiopidae) associated with Moraceae plant family. Zootaxa 5375 (1): 93-102, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5375.1.5, URL: https://www.mapress.com/zt/article/download/zootaxa.5375.1.5/52315
