taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
C37C6325FFFA8A4BFCC6FB8AFD9BFBB6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5367561/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5367561	Figure 2. A, geographical location of the sampled populations along its distributional range (for abbreviations of localities, see Table 1), and results of the BARRIER analysis. Pie charts display the frequency of occurrence of each haplotype in each locality; the size of the pie chart is proportional to population size. The genetic barriers in red are numbered (in Roman numerals) and the thickness is proportional to the ratio between genetic distance values between populations on both sides of each barrier to the average genetic distance among populations in the whole data set. The populations inside unfilled irregular shapes are the populations pooled by the BARRIER analysis (for more detail, see Material and methods). B, the four major genetic boundaries (thick colored lines) detected by BARRIER 2.2 using FST values. The order of the numerical pairs represents the sequence of the boundary formation. The black dots correspond to the population numbers plotted along the ordination (some populations were pooled by the analysis). The dashed lines and solid lines represent the Voronoi tessellation and the Delaunay triangulation, respectively.	Figure 2. A, geographical location of the sampled populations along its distributional range (for abbreviations of localities, see Table 1), and results of the BARRIER analysis. Pie charts display the frequency of occurrence of each haplotype in each locality; the size of the pie chart is proportional to population size. The genetic barriers in red are numbered (in Roman numerals) and the thickness is proportional to the ratio between genetic distance values between populations on both sides of each barrier to the average genetic distance among populations in the whole data set. The populations inside unfilled irregular shapes are the populations pooled by the BARRIER analysis (for more detail, see Material and methods). B, the four major genetic boundaries (thick colored lines) detected by BARRIER 2.2 using FST values. The order of the numerical pairs represents the sequence of the boundary formation. The black dots correspond to the population numbers plotted along the ordination (some populations were pooled by the analysis). The dashed lines and solid lines represent the Voronoi tessellation and the Delaunay triangulation, respectively.	2016-04-20	Rivera, Daniela S.;Vianna, Juliana A.;Ebensperger, Luis A.;Palma, R. Eduardo		Zenodo	biologists	Rivera, Daniela S.;Vianna, Juliana A.;Ebensperger, Luis A.;Palma, R. Eduardo			
C37C6325FFFA8A4BFCC6FB8AFD9BFBB6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5367567/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5367567	Figure 5. Map, showing the putative barriers (major rivers, lakes, salt flats, the Atacama Desert, and the mountain chains of the Andes) that separate the populations of Octodontomys gliroides.	Figure 5. Map, showing the putative barriers (major rivers, lakes, salt flats, the Atacama Desert, and the mountain chains of the Andes) that separate the populations of Octodontomys gliroides.	2016-04-20	Rivera, Daniela S.;Vianna, Juliana A.;Ebensperger, Luis A.;Palma, R. Eduardo		Zenodo	biologists	Rivera, Daniela S.;Vianna, Juliana A.;Ebensperger, Luis A.;Palma, R. Eduardo			
C37C6325FFFA8A4BFCC6FB8AFD9BFBB6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5367559/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5367559	Figure 1. A, phylogenetic relationships within the principal nodes for Octodontomys gliroides, based on Bayesian analysis of mtDNA control region haplotypes. Divergence dates of the most recent common ancestor in million years (above the branches), 95% credible intervals (below the branches), and nodes with high posterior probability (below the 95% credible intervals) are shown. The two main lineages are indicated by black and red lines, and the sublineages found in lineage A, referred to in the text as A1 and A2, respectively, are coloured as follow: sublineage A1, blue; sublineage A2, green. B, haplotype network recovered by statistical parsimony analysis. Each circle represents a different haplotype with size proportional to frequencies, with the largest circles representing the most abundant haplotypes. The coloration pattern of each haplotype represents the lineages and sublineages recovered in the phylogenetic analysis. White circles denote the number of mutational steps between haplotypes. For geographical details of sampling populations and haplotype codes, see Table 1.	Figure 1. A, phylogenetic relationships within the principal nodes for Octodontomys gliroides, based on Bayesian analysis of mtDNA control region haplotypes. Divergence dates of the most recent common ancestor in million years (above the branches), 95% credible intervals (below the branches), and nodes with high posterior probability (below the 95% credible intervals) are shown. The two main lineages are indicated by black and red lines, and the sublineages found in lineage A, referred to in the text as A1 and A2, respectively, are coloured as follow: sublineage A1, blue; sublineage A2, green. B, haplotype network recovered by statistical parsimony analysis. Each circle represents a different haplotype with size proportional to frequencies, with the largest circles representing the most abundant haplotypes. The coloration pattern of each haplotype represents the lineages and sublineages recovered in the phylogenetic analysis. White circles denote the number of mutational steps between haplotypes. For geographical details of sampling populations and haplotype codes, see Table 1.	2016-04-20	Rivera, Daniela S.;Vianna, Juliana A.;Ebensperger, Luis A.;Palma, R. Eduardo		Zenodo	biologists	Rivera, Daniela S.;Vianna, Juliana A.;Ebensperger, Luis A.;Palma, R. Eduardo			
C37C6325FFFA8A4BFCC6FB8AFD9BFBB6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/5367563/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5367563	Figure 3. Map of cluster membership and posterior probability for each cluster based on the GENELAND analysis. A, the estimated cluster membership represents the modal cluster assignment of each pixel, and the rest of the inset maps show the posterior probability of individuals of Octodontomys gliroides in Argentina, Bolivia, and Chile. Black dots represent sampling localities. The three clusters are: B, populations of northern and central Bolivia; C, populations from northern Chile, central and southern Bolivia, and northern Argentina; and D, the remaining Argentinian populations and one population from southern Bolivia. The white area represents a probability between 90 and 100% for sampling localities to belong to their respective cluster.	Figure 3. Map of cluster membership and posterior probability for each cluster based on the GENELAND analysis. A, the estimated cluster membership represents the modal cluster assignment of each pixel, and the rest of the inset maps show the posterior probability of individuals of Octodontomys gliroides in Argentina, Bolivia, and Chile. Black dots represent sampling localities. The three clusters are: B, populations of northern and central Bolivia; C, populations from northern Chile, central and southern Bolivia, and northern Argentina; and D, the remaining Argentinian populations and one population from southern Bolivia. The white area represents a probability between 90 and 100% for sampling localities to belong to their respective cluster.	2016-04-20	Rivera, Daniela S.;Vianna, Juliana A.;Ebensperger, Luis A.;Palma, R. Eduardo		Zenodo	biologists	Rivera, Daniela S.;Vianna, Juliana A.;Ebensperger, Luis A.;Palma, R. Eduardo			
