taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
D17787854F5C1F2B0DD76E8D140FF969.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/829059/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.829059	FIGURE 4. Habitus of Azollaebagous clarencensis, in (A) dorsal and (B) lateral view; Bagous (Hydrillaebagous) hydrillae, in (C) dorsal and (D) lateral view. Venter of (E) Bagous (Bagous) binodulus; (F) Memptorrhynchus crispus. Detail of ventrite 1 after removal of scales of (G) Bagous (Macropelmus) affaber; (H) Bagous (Macropelmus) collignensis. Not at the same scale.	FIGURE 4. Habitus of Azollaebagous clarencensis, in (A) dorsal and (B) lateral view; Bagous (Hydrillaebagous) hydrillae, in (C) dorsal and (D) lateral view. Venter of (E) Bagous (Bagous) binodulus; (F) Memptorrhynchus crispus. Detail of ventrite 1 after removal of scales of (G) Bagous (Macropelmus) affaber; (H) Bagous (Macropelmus) collignensis. Not at the same scale.	2017-07-05	ROBERTO CALDARA;CHARLES W. O’BRIEN;MASSIMO MEREGALLI		Zenodo	biologists	ROBERTO CALDARA;CHARLES W. O’BRIEN;MASSIMO MEREGALLI			
D17787854F591F2F0DD76AD016C2FDE5.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/829071/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.829071	FIGURE 10. Morphological analysis—type species only. Bayesian consensus tree (50 % majority rule). Taxa in bold font: valid taxa recognized in the present work; larger font: genera, smaller font: subgenera. Taxa in regular font: synonyms in the present work. Numbers above branches: support values, in percentage, in the following order: posterior probability (BI) / bootstrap value (ML) / symmetric resampling (MP); ‘ ns’ means that the group was present, but its support was <50 %; ‘ np’ means that the group was not present. Number below branches: Bremer support in the MP analysis. Scale bar unit: expected changes of state per character. MP analysis: length 146, consistency index = 0.70, retention index = 0.78.	FIGURE 10. Morphological analysis—type species only. Bayesian consensus tree (50 % majority rule). Taxa in bold font: valid taxa recognized in the present work; larger font: genera, smaller font: subgenera. Taxa in regular font: synonyms in the present work. Numbers above branches: support values, in percentage, in the following order: posterior probability (BI) / bootstrap value (ML) / symmetric resampling (MP); ‘ ns’ means that the group was present, but its support was <50 %; ‘ np’ means that the group was not present. Number below branches: Bremer support in the MP analysis. Scale bar unit: expected changes of state per character. MP analysis: length 146, consistency index = 0.70, retention index = 0.78.	2017-07-05	ROBERTO CALDARA;CHARLES W. O’BRIEN;MASSIMO MEREGALLI		Zenodo	biologists	ROBERTO CALDARA;CHARLES W. O’BRIEN;MASSIMO MEREGALLI			
D17787854F541F230DD76B9916D4F967.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/829075/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.829075	FIGURE 12. Mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I analysis. Bayesian consensus tree (50 % majority rule). Codes after the species name are GenBank Accession Numbers. Scale bar unit: expected substitutions per site.	FIGURE 12. Mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I analysis. Bayesian consensus tree (50 % majority rule). Codes after the species name are GenBank Accession Numbers. Scale bar unit: expected substitutions per site.	2017-07-05	ROBERTO CALDARA;CHARLES W. O’BRIEN;MASSIMO MEREGALLI		Zenodo	biologists	ROBERTO CALDARA;CHARLES W. O’BRIEN;MASSIMO MEREGALLI			
D17787854F511F260DD76D901413FAB7.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/829069/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.829069	FIGURE 9. Morphological analysis—all species. Bayesian consensus tree (50 % majority rule). Numbers above branches: support values, in percentage, in the following order: posterior probability (BI) / bootstrap value (ML) / symmetric resampling (MP); ‘ ns’ means that the group was present, but its support was <50 %; ‘ np’ means that the group was not present. Number below branches: Bremer support in the MP analysis. Scale bar unit: expected changes of state per character. MP analysis: length 261, consistency index = 0.61, retention index = 0.83. Outgroup taxa not reported to increase readability of the Bagoini clade.	FIGURE 9. Morphological analysis—all species. Bayesian consensus tree (50 % majority rule). Numbers above branches: support values, in percentage, in the following order: posterior probability (BI) / bootstrap value (ML) / symmetric resampling (MP); ‘ ns’ means that the group was present, but its support was <50 %; ‘ np’ means that the group was not present. Number below branches: Bremer support in the MP analysis. Scale bar unit: expected changes of state per character. MP analysis: length 261, consistency index = 0.61, retention index = 0.83. Outgroup taxa not reported to increase readability of the Bagoini clade.	2017-07-05	ROBERTO CALDARA;CHARLES W. O’BRIEN;MASSIMO MEREGALLI		Zenodo	biologists	ROBERTO CALDARA;CHARLES W. O’BRIEN;MASSIMO MEREGALLI			
D17787854F511F260DD76D901413FAB7.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/829071/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.829071	FIGURE 10. Morphological analysis—type species only. Bayesian consensus tree (50 % majority rule). Taxa in bold font: valid taxa recognized in the present work; larger font: genera, smaller font: subgenera. Taxa in regular font: synonyms in the present work. Numbers above branches: support values, in percentage, in the following order: posterior probability (BI) / bootstrap value (ML) / symmetric resampling (MP); ‘ ns’ means that the group was present, but its support was <50 %; ‘ np’ means that the group was not present. Number below branches: Bremer support in the MP analysis. Scale bar unit: expected changes of state per character. MP analysis: length 146, consistency index = 0.70, retention index = 0.78.	FIGURE 10. Morphological analysis—type species only. Bayesian consensus tree (50 % majority rule). Taxa in bold font: valid taxa recognized in the present work; larger font: genera, smaller font: subgenera. Taxa in regular font: synonyms in the present work. Numbers above branches: support values, in percentage, in the following order: posterior probability (BI) / bootstrap value (ML) / symmetric resampling (MP); ‘ ns’ means that the group was present, but its support was <50 %; ‘ np’ means that the group was not present. Number below branches: Bremer support in the MP analysis. Scale bar unit: expected changes of state per character. MP analysis: length 146, consistency index = 0.70, retention index = 0.78.	2017-07-05	ROBERTO CALDARA;CHARLES W. O’BRIEN;MASSIMO MEREGALLI		Zenodo	biologists	ROBERTO CALDARA;CHARLES W. O’BRIEN;MASSIMO MEREGALLI			
D17787854F531F250DD76ADB1651FE0F.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/829075/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.829075	FIGURE 12. Mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I analysis. Bayesian consensus tree (50 % majority rule). Codes after the species name are GenBank Accession Numbers. Scale bar unit: expected substitutions per site.	FIGURE 12. Mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase I analysis. Bayesian consensus tree (50 % majority rule). Codes after the species name are GenBank Accession Numbers. Scale bar unit: expected substitutions per site.	2017-07-05	ROBERTO CALDARA;CHARLES W. O’BRIEN;MASSIMO MEREGALLI		Zenodo	biologists	ROBERTO CALDARA;CHARLES W. O’BRIEN;MASSIMO MEREGALLI			
D17787854F4D1F3B0DD769001282FBAD.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/829053/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.829053	FIGURE 1. Rostrum in lateral view of (A) Hydronomus alismatis; (B) Memptorrhynchus crispus; (C) Bagous (Parabagous) guttatus; (D) Bagous (Hydronoplus) longulus. Rostrum in dorsal view of (E) Hydronomus alismatis; (F) Memptorrhynchus crispus; (G) Bagous (Hydronoplus) longulus; (H) Bagous (Macropelmus) tubulus. Not at the same scale. Scale references are not reported in this and following figures since the illustrations are only meant to show the characters used for the phylogenetic inference.	FIGURE 1. Rostrum in lateral view of (A) Hydronomus alismatis; (B) Memptorrhynchus crispus; (C) Bagous (Parabagous) guttatus; (D) Bagous (Hydronoplus) longulus. Rostrum in dorsal view of (E) Hydronomus alismatis; (F) Memptorrhynchus crispus; (G) Bagous (Hydronoplus) longulus; (H) Bagous (Macropelmus) tubulus. Not at the same scale. Scale references are not reported in this and following figures since the illustrations are only meant to show the characters used for the phylogenetic inference.	2017-07-05	ROBERTO CALDARA;CHARLES W. O’BRIEN;MASSIMO MEREGALLI		Zenodo	biologists	ROBERTO CALDARA;CHARLES W. O’BRIEN;MASSIMO MEREGALLI			
D17787854F4D1F3B0DD769001282FBAD.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/829057/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.829057	FIGURE 3. Prosternum of (A) Hydronomus alismatis; (B) Memptorrhynchus crispus: (C) Bagous (Hydronoplus) longulus; (D) Bagous (Macropelmus) geniculatus. Elytra of (E) Bagous (Macropelmus) tubulus; (F) Bagous (Macropelmus) elegans; (G) Bagous (Macropelmus) trapae. Anterior leg of (H) Memptorrhynchus crispus; (I) Bagous (Macropelmus) fragosus; (J) Bagous (Macropelmus) trapae. Not at the same scale.	FIGURE 3. Prosternum of (A) Hydronomus alismatis; (B) Memptorrhynchus crispus: (C) Bagous (Hydronoplus) longulus; (D) Bagous (Macropelmus) geniculatus. Elytra of (E) Bagous (Macropelmus) tubulus; (F) Bagous (Macropelmus) elegans; (G) Bagous (Macropelmus) trapae. Anterior leg of (H) Memptorrhynchus crispus; (I) Bagous (Macropelmus) fragosus; (J) Bagous (Macropelmus) trapae. Not at the same scale.	2017-07-05	ROBERTO CALDARA;CHARLES W. O’BRIEN;MASSIMO MEREGALLI		Zenodo	biologists	ROBERTO CALDARA;CHARLES W. O’BRIEN;MASSIMO MEREGALLI			
D17787854F4D1F3B0DD769001282FBAD.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/829067/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.829067	FIGURE 8. Penis in dorsal and lateral view of (A) Bagous (Macropelmus) subruber; (B) Bagous (Macropelmus) brevis; (C) Bagous (Macropelmus) frit, with detail of the small teeth; (D) Bagous (Macropelmus) trapae. Spiculum ventrale of (E) Bagous (Bagous) quadrimaculatus; (F) Memptorrhynchus brevipennis; (G) Bagous (Parabagous) chevrolati; (H) Bagous (Macropelmus) elegans. Sclerites of bursa copulatrix of (I) Bagous (Parabagous) chevrolati. Gonocoxa of (I) Bagous (Bagous) nympheae; (J) Bagous (Macropelmus) laevigatus. Not at the same scale.	FIGURE 8. Penis in dorsal and lateral view of (A) Bagous (Macropelmus) subruber; (B) Bagous (Macropelmus) brevis; (C) Bagous (Macropelmus) frit, with detail of the small teeth; (D) Bagous (Macropelmus) trapae. Spiculum ventrale of (E) Bagous (Bagous) quadrimaculatus; (F) Memptorrhynchus brevipennis; (G) Bagous (Parabagous) chevrolati; (H) Bagous (Macropelmus) elegans. Sclerites of bursa copulatrix of (I) Bagous (Parabagous) chevrolati. Gonocoxa of (I) Bagous (Bagous) nympheae; (J) Bagous (Macropelmus) laevigatus. Not at the same scale.	2017-07-05	ROBERTO CALDARA;CHARLES W. O’BRIEN;MASSIMO MEREGALLI		Zenodo	biologists	ROBERTO CALDARA;CHARLES W. O’BRIEN;MASSIMO MEREGALLI			
D17787854F4D1F3B0DD769001282FBAD.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/829059/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.829059	FIGURE 4. Habitus of Azollaebagous clarencensis, in (A) dorsal and (B) lateral view; Bagous (Hydrillaebagous) hydrillae, in (C) dorsal and (D) lateral view. Venter of (E) Bagous (Bagous) binodulus; (F) Memptorrhynchus crispus. Detail of ventrite 1 after removal of scales of (G) Bagous (Macropelmus) affaber; (H) Bagous (Macropelmus) collignensis. Not at the same scale.	FIGURE 4. Habitus of Azollaebagous clarencensis, in (A) dorsal and (B) lateral view; Bagous (Hydrillaebagous) hydrillae, in (C) dorsal and (D) lateral view. Venter of (E) Bagous (Bagous) binodulus; (F) Memptorrhynchus crispus. Detail of ventrite 1 after removal of scales of (G) Bagous (Macropelmus) affaber; (H) Bagous (Macropelmus) collignensis. Not at the same scale.	2017-07-05	ROBERTO CALDARA;CHARLES W. O’BRIEN;MASSIMO MEREGALLI		Zenodo	biologists	ROBERTO CALDARA;CHARLES W. O’BRIEN;MASSIMO MEREGALLI			
D17787854F4D1F3B0DD769001282FBAD.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/829055/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.829055	FIGURE 2. Pronotum of (A) Bagous (Macropelmus) setosus; (B) Bagous (Macropelmus) argillaceus; (C) Bagous (Bagous) binodulus. Antenna of (D) Bagous (Parabagous) guttatus; (E) Bagous (Macropelmus) geniculatus. Fore tarsus of (F) Bagous (Parabagous) guttatus; (G) Bagous (Macropelmus) trapae. Detail of elytra of (H) Bagous (Macropelmus) limosus. Not at the same scale.	FIGURE 2. Pronotum of (A) Bagous (Macropelmus) setosus; (B) Bagous (Macropelmus) argillaceus; (C) Bagous (Bagous) binodulus. Antenna of (D) Bagous (Parabagous) guttatus; (E) Bagous (Macropelmus) geniculatus. Fore tarsus of (F) Bagous (Parabagous) guttatus; (G) Bagous (Macropelmus) trapae. Detail of elytra of (H) Bagous (Macropelmus) limosus. Not at the same scale.	2017-07-05	ROBERTO CALDARA;CHARLES W. O’BRIEN;MASSIMO MEREGALLI		Zenodo	biologists	ROBERTO CALDARA;CHARLES W. O’BRIEN;MASSIMO MEREGALLI			
D17787854F4D1F3B0DD769001282FBAD.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/829061/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.829061	FIGURE 5. Penis in dorsal view of (A) Hydronomus alismatis; (B) Memptorrhynchus brevipennis; (C) Bagous (Parabagous) costulatus; (D) Bagous (Parabagous) longirostris; (E) Bagous (Bagous) binodulus; (F) Bagous (Bagous) robustus; (G) Azollaebagous clarencensis; (H) Bagous (Bagous) josephi. Not at the same scale.	FIGURE 5. Penis in dorsal view of (A) Hydronomus alismatis; (B) Memptorrhynchus brevipennis; (C) Bagous (Parabagous) costulatus; (D) Bagous (Parabagous) longirostris; (E) Bagous (Bagous) binodulus; (F) Bagous (Bagous) robustus; (G) Azollaebagous clarencensis; (H) Bagous (Bagous) josephi. Not at the same scale.	2017-07-05	ROBERTO CALDARA;CHARLES W. O’BRIEN;MASSIMO MEREGALLI		Zenodo	biologists	ROBERTO CALDARA;CHARLES W. O’BRIEN;MASSIMO MEREGALLI			
D17787854F4D1F3B0DD769001282FBAD.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/829063/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.829063	FIGURE 6. Penis in dorsal and lateral view of (A) Bagous (Hydrillaebagous) hydrillae; (B) Bagous (Macropelmus) tempestivus; (C and D) Bagous (Macropelmus) affaber; (E) Bagous (Macropelmus) lutosus; (F) Bagous (Macropelmus) exilis; (G) Bagous (Macropelmus) cylindricus; (H) Bagous (Macropelmus) dieckmanni; (I) Bagous (Macropelmus) peregrinus. Not at the same scale.	FIGURE 6. Penis in dorsal and lateral view of (A) Bagous (Hydrillaebagous) hydrillae; (B) Bagous (Macropelmus) tempestivus; (C and D) Bagous (Macropelmus) affaber; (E) Bagous (Macropelmus) lutosus; (F) Bagous (Macropelmus) exilis; (G) Bagous (Macropelmus) cylindricus; (H) Bagous (Macropelmus) dieckmanni; (I) Bagous (Macropelmus) peregrinus. Not at the same scale.	2017-07-05	ROBERTO CALDARA;CHARLES W. O’BRIEN;MASSIMO MEREGALLI		Zenodo	biologists	ROBERTO CALDARA;CHARLES W. O’BRIEN;MASSIMO MEREGALLI			
