identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
D04E87BCFFD0FFB6FE3FC1869720FE93.text	D04E87BCFFD0FFB6FE3FC1869720FE93.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Ascorhynchus heuresis Bamber 2002	<div><p>Ascorhynchus heuresis sp. nov. (®gure 1)</p> <p>Material. One male (holotype), Station 10379#38, 35ss57.0¾N 32ss53.3¾W, 2840± 2980 m, 14 June 1981 (Registration No. NHM 2000.26 6).</p> <p>Description of male. Relatively small species. Trunk (®gure 1A±C) fully segmented, glabrous, ®rst three segment posteriors slightly raised and bearing pointed mediodorsal tubercle; lateral processes separated by just less than their own diameters, each bearing pointed dorsodistal tubercle. Cephalon with pair of pointed anterodorsal tubercles (`horns’); ocular tubercle at anterior margin, pointed, with four eyes. Last trunk segment without dorsal tubercle. Abdomen slender, naked, horizontal, extending to less than half length of coxa 2 of leg 4.</p> <p>Chelifore scape of single article, cylindrical, curved, naked; chela digitate, tiny, movable ®nger ināted proximally, ®ngers distally very slender.</p> <p>Palp (®gure 1E) of 10 articles, article 3 naked, longer than 5, article 5 ināted, distal articles not very slender, with few ventral setae.</p> <p>Oviger (®gure 1A) of 10 articles, proximal three short, 5&gt;4&gt;6, strigilis articles subequal, bearing 5, 4, 4 and 4 compound spines, respectively, distal claw slender, pointed, not denticulate, shorter than distal article.</p> <p>Legs (®gure 1D) slender; coxae 1 and 3 subequal, half length of coxa 2; femur with few setae, single dorsal cement gland pore just distal of median; tibia 1 longer than femur, dorsal, lateral and ventral setae, some as long as tibial diameter; tibia 2 longest article, setose as tibia 1 plus group of short`sole’ setae distally; tarsus slender, with nine short sole setae; propodus 1.5 times tarsus, with nine short sole setae, elongate dorsal seta. Main claw stout, half length of propodus. Auxiliary claws absent.</p> <p>Female unknown.</p> <p>Measurements (mm). Trunk length (anterior edge of cephalon to base of abdomen) 2.23; width across second lateral processes 1.32; proboscis 1.6; abdomen 0.73; leg 2, coxa 1 0.35; coxa 2 0.67; coxa 3 0.3; femur 2.27; tibia 1 2.73; tibia 2 2.93; tarsus 0.41; propodus 0.59; main claw 0.28.</p> <p>Etymology. From the Greek (as consistent with the generic name) for a discovery (noun, gender female), after the survey vessel.</p> <p>Remarks. There are 10 described species of Ascorhynchus with a single-articled chelifore, tarsus greater than 50% of the propodal length (`longitarsal’), and with tubercles mid-dorsally on the trunk, distally on the lateral processes and anterodorsally on the cephalon (`horns ’). Of these, the new species shows similarities, particularly in the swollen ®fth palp article and the non-tripartite proboscis, inter alia, to Ascorhynchus simplex Nakamura and Child, 1991 from Sagami Bay, Japan (at 110±122 m depth) and A. orthostomum Child, 1998 from New Zealand waters (1400±1586 m).</p> <p>Proportions of the articles of the ovigers and legs of these three species are very similar. They are most evidently distinguished by the number of cement gland pores, Ascorhynchus simplex having eight to nine per femur, A. orthostomum having two, and the present species only one. The proboscis of Ascorhynchus simplex is nearly as long as the trunk, that of A. orthostomum is longer than the trunk, and both are cylindrical distal to the peduncular area; the proboscis of A. heuresis sp. nov. is about 70% of the trunk length and bulbous. The abdomen of the new species extends to less than half the length of coxa 2 of leg 4, while those of the other two species extend to the distal edge of coxa 2. Also, while the distal palp articles of the other two species are`very slender’ (some four times as long as wide), those of the new species are less then three times as long as wide. Ascorhynchus heuresis sp. nov. is the least hirsute, notably on the proximal articles of the palp and oviger.</p> <p>The specimen was collected from an epibenthic trawl on the eastern slope of the Mid-Atlanti c Ridge.</p></div> 	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/D04E87BCFFD0FFB6FE3FC1869720FE93	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Bamber, Roger N.	Bamber, Roger N. (2002): Bathypelagic pycnogonids (Arthropoda, Pycnogonida) from the Discovery deep-sea cruises. Journal of Natural History 36 (6): 715-727, DOI: 10.1080/00222930010025932, URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00222930010025932
D04E87BCFFD6FFB6FE63C00396A0FDFB.text	D04E87BCFFD6FFB6FE63C00396A0FDFB.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Callipallenidae	<div><p>CALLIPALLENIDAE</p> <p>The genus Pallenopsis was moved to the Phoxichilidiidae by Arnaud and Bamber (1987) as suggested by Stock (1978a). Current thinking (e.g. Child, 1995; Bamber, in press) has returned the genus to the Callipallenidae. All the present species found bathypelagically are of the subgenus Bathypallenopsis. The specimens of Pallenopsis (B.) tritonis from the current collections have been reported on elsewhere (Bamber, in press).</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/D04E87BCFFD6FFB6FE63C00396A0FDFB	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Bamber, Roger N.	Bamber, Roger N. (2002): Bathypelagic pycnogonids (Arthropoda, Pycnogonida) from the Discovery deep-sea cruises. Journal of Natural History 36 (6): 715-727, DOI: 10.1080/00222930010025932, URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00222930010025932
D04E87BCFFD6FFB6FEA6C3E895E5FB46.text	D04E87BCFFD6FFB6FEA6C3E895E5FB46.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Pallenopsis (Bathypallenopsis) calcanea Stephensen 1933	<div><p>Pallenopsis (Bathypallenopsis) calcanea Stephensen, 1933</p> <p>Bamber and Thurston, 1995: 139; ®gure 7A.</p> <p>Material. Four specimens, sample 7709#17; one specimen, sample 7709#22; two specimens, sample 7709#23; three specimens, sample 7709#24; two specimens, sample 7709#25; three specimens (two juveniles), sample 7709#35; one specimen, sample 7709#44; one specimen, sample 7711#1; three specimens, sample 7711#8; one specimen, sample 7711#36; one specimen, sample 7716#1; one specimen, sample 10105#1; one specimen, sample 52101. Depth range (trawl depths) of this material, 200± 1500 m.</p> <p>This cosmopolitan species is the second commonest bathypelagic species recorded in the present material (after Pallenopsis tritonis). It was also noted by Hedgpeth (1962, with review of world-wide records to that date), by Mauchline (1984) in the Rockall Trough and by Nakamura and Child (1991 with literature) oOE Japan. Stephensen’s types from oOE Greenland were also bathypelagic (Stephensen, 1933). Although genital pores were not evident, and no gravid specimens were found, the gender of all of this material would appear to be female, as none were found with cement gland tubes.</p> <p>The present material is from the north-east Atlantic Basin, ranging from south of Iceland to the Rockall Trough, the Porcupine Bank and Sea Bight.</p></div> 	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/D04E87BCFFD6FFB6FEA6C3E895E5FB46	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Bamber, Roger N.	Bamber, Roger N. (2002): Bathypelagic pycnogonids (Arthropoda, Pycnogonida) from the Discovery deep-sea cruises. Journal of Natural History 36 (6): 715-727, DOI: 10.1080/00222930010025932, URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00222930010025932
D04E87BCFFD6FFB6FEC5C47F95B6FA6F.text	D04E87BCFFD6FFB6FEC5C47F95B6FA6F.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Pallenopsis (Bathypallenopsis) juttingae Stock 1964	<div><p>Pallenopsis (Bathypallenopsis) juttingae Stock, 1964</p> <p>Bamber and Thurston, 1995: 139.</p> <p>Material. One female, sample 3048, 650±0 m.</p> <p>The holotype of this species was collected in a plankton haul (Stock, 1964). It remains known only from the Bay of Biscay (Stock, 1964; Arnaud, 1973).</p></div> 	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/D04E87BCFFD6FFB6FEC5C47F95B6FA6F	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Bamber, Roger N.	Bamber, Roger N. (2002): Bathypelagic pycnogonids (Arthropoda, Pycnogonida) from the Discovery deep-sea cruises. Journal of Natural History 36 (6): 715-727, DOI: 10.1080/00222930010025932, URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00222930010025932
D04E87BCFFD6FFB6FEA8C4879490F938.text	D04E87BCFFD6FFB6FEA8C4879490F938.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Pallenopsis (Bathypallenopsis) mollissima (Hoek 1881)	<div><p>Pallenopsis (Bathypallenopsis) mollissima (Hoek, 1881)</p> <p>Bamber and Thurston, 1995: 140; ®gure 7B.</p> <p>Material. One subadult, sample 7711#1, 1000± 500 m.</p> <p>A rarely recorded species, this record from the Rockall Trough is not far from that of the specimen recorded by Bamber (1985).</p></div> 	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/D04E87BCFFD6FFB6FEA8C4879490F938	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Bamber, Roger N.	Bamber, Roger N. (2002): Bathypelagic pycnogonids (Arthropoda, Pycnogonida) from the Discovery deep-sea cruises. Journal of Natural History 36 (6): 715-727, DOI: 10.1080/00222930010025932, URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00222930010025932
D04E87BCFFD7FFB4FECCC1EC95B0FBD6.text	D04E87BCFFD7FFB4FECCC1EC95B0FBD6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Pallenopsis (Bathypallenopsis) scoparia Fage 1956	<div><p>Pallenopsis (Bathypallenopsis) scoparia Fage, 1956</p> <p>(®gure 2)</p> <p>Bamber and Thurston, 1995: 140; ®gure 7C.</p> <p>Material. One male, sample WS638 (Registration No. NHM.2000.147 3); one female, sample 10105#12; one female?, 10379#9. Depth range (trawl depths) of this material, 500±1000 m. This species has also been recorded from the bathypelagic of the Rockall Trough by Mauchline (1984) and on scyphomedusae oOE the Bahamas (Child and Harbison, 1986); it is recorded from all the major oceans. The present records are scattered, respectively from the Peru ± Chile Trench, the Porcupine Bank and the Mid-Atlantic Ridge.</p> <p>The specimen from sample WS638 is the ®rst male to be recorded (albeit collected some 25 years before the original species description). Child (1992) presented comprehensive illustrations of the female, and the present females are consistent with his description. The principal distinctions of the male are in the structure of the oviger and the presence of cement glands.</p> <p>The male oviger (®gure 2A) is of 10 articles, generally more elongate than those of the female (see Child, 1992, ®gure 31F) and without the inātion of the fourth article shown by the female. Setae are sparse and short, and directed distally.</p> <p>Recently Bamber (2000, in press) described the male oviger in some other species of Pallenopsis, these being signi®cantly larger than those of the female (P. (B.) tritonis) and with larger setae directed proximally (e.g. P. (B.) tritonis) and hypothesized that these setae were adapted for holding the eggs and/or larvae. The spination of the male oviger of P. (B.) scoparia may imply that the eggs are not retained by the male, but are rapidly transferred to the presumed scyphomedusan host.</p> <p>Cement gland tubes are evident mid-ventrally on the femora of all eight legs (®gure 2B), of a shape unusual for the genus. They appear as small ¯ask-shaped structures, less than 0.1 times as long as the femur diameter. The cement gland itself is not conspicuous.</p> <p>The tarsi and propodi of the ®rst three pairs of legs are typical for the species, bearing dense brushes of setae on their`soles’. Those of the fourth legs (®gure 2C) show simple, sparse spination, with six sole spines and three distal spines on the propodus. The sole also bears a few very small curved setules.</p> <p>The diOEering morphology of the fourth pair of walking legs, without the dense brushes of setae on tarsus and propodus, has been noted before (Stock, 1987). In fact, no published record speci®cally describes the fourth pair of legs as having dense setal brushes (by convention, it is the third leg which is normally ®gured). Both of the female specimens recorded herein also have setal brushes on the ®rst three pairs of legs, but simple and sparse sole spines on the fourth legs as shown for the male. It seems likely that this is a consistent feature of this species.</p></div> 	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/D04E87BCFFD7FFB4FECCC1EC95B0FBD6	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Bamber, Roger N.	Bamber, Roger N. (2002): Bathypelagic pycnogonids (Arthropoda, Pycnogonida) from the Discovery deep-sea cruises. Journal of Natural History 36 (6): 715-727, DOI: 10.1080/00222930010025932, URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00222930010025932
D04E87BCFFD4FFB4FF6EC5C69790FA13.text	D04E87BCFFD4FFB4FF6EC5C69790FA13.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Pallenopsis (Bathypallenopsis)	<div><p>Pallenopsis (Bathypallenopsis) sp. indet. cf. tydemani Loman, 1908</p> <p>Material. One juvenile, sample 11121#17, 3490± 3520 m.</p> <p>This specimen is too immature to identify con®dently to species. The oviger is of only three to four articles; the propodus is similar to that of P. tritonis, but auxiliary claws are shorter; there is no ocular tubercle, but two conspicuous small tubercles instead; this and the proboscis are reminiscent of those of P. tydemani. The location (east of the Azores) and depth are consistent with the known distribution of that species.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/D04E87BCFFD4FFB4FF6EC5C69790FA13	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Bamber, Roger N.	Bamber, Roger N. (2002): Bathypelagic pycnogonids (Arthropoda, Pycnogonida) from the Discovery deep-sea cruises. Journal of Natural History 36 (6): 715-727, DOI: 10.1080/00222930010025932, URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00222930010025932
D04E87BCFFD4FFBBFF08C7299439FD14.text	D04E87BCFFD4FFBBFF08C7299439FD14.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Colossendeis macerrima Wilson 1881	<div><p>The Colossendeis macerrima complex</p> <p>The complex of species which have been variously attributed to Colossendeis macerrima Wilson, 1881 is of taxa with a long, slender proboscis (1.5 to 3 times as long as the trunk), distinct cuticular-reinforce d anterolatera l corners on the cephalon, and a palp article 3 about half the length of 5.</p> <p>Calman (1923) mentioned forms (of`Colossendeis macerrima ’) with a distally narrow, upturned proboscis in some Arabian Sea material; Stock (1975), referring to these and considering C. minor Schimkewitsch, 1893 and C. gardineri Carpenter, 1907, proposed to`follow Calman, and consider these diOEerent forms to belong to one, variable, species’.</p> <p>Attempts to unravel the Colossendeis macerrima complex were undertaken by Stock (1978b) who reinstated C. leptorhynchus Hoek, 1881, subsequently (1984) reinstating C. minor and C. gardineri, in the latter case after re-examination of the type and (then) only known specimen; unfortunately, he did not present data on the leg article lengths of C. gardineri, and the type has been re-examined herein to con®rm the data presented by Carpenter (1907) (table 1).</p> <p>Stock’s conclusions may be summarized as follows:</p> <p>Colossendeis minor and C. gardineri both have a signi®cantly tapering proboscis, with the distal half about half the diameter of that proximal to the mid-proboscis swelling, and the tip markedly upturned, the mouth pointing upwards. Colossendeis minor has been collected over a range of sizes comparable to the known range of C. macerrima s. str.: its single consistent distinction is the relative lengths of the distal palp articles, with the 10th article signi®cantly longer than the 9th (ca 1.5 times as long), whereas it is subequal to each of articles 8 and 9 in the other three taxa.</p> <p>Colossendeis gardineri has the C. minor proboscis morphology, but not the elongate distal palp article; in addition, the sole spines of both tarsus and propodus are conspicuously stronger than those of any of the other three taxa, wherein they appear as setae.</p> <p>Colossendeis macerrima and C. leptorhynchus have a proboscis distally tapering slightly or not at all, straight or slightly upturned; the distal three palp articles are subequal; propodal sole spines (setae) are inconspicuous. Stock (1978b) redescribed the types of Colossendeis leptorhynchus, a distinct species characterized by article 7 of the palp being longer than the 6th (1.2 times as long, compared with &lt;1.5 times as long in all other species of the complex) and the tarsus being more than twice the length of the propodus (2.3 times as long, compared with &lt;1.9 times as long in all other species of the complex). Otherwise, it closely resembles C. macerrima s. str.</p> <p>Fry and Hedgpeth (1969) undertook morphometric analyses of a number of (predominantly Antarctic) species of Colossendeis, but including C. macerrima, and indicated heterogonic growth, usually with ranges of various meristic ratios in</p> <p>Coxa1 0.70 P3 3.425</p> <p>Coxa2 0.83 P4 0.49</p> <p>Coxa3 0.83 P5 4.815</p> <p>Femur 13.93 P6 0.915</p> <p>Tibia 1 13.89 P7 0.925</p> <p>Tibia 2 11.83 P8 0.41</p> <p>Tarsus 3.46 P9 0.38</p> <p>Propodus 1.88 P10 0.48</p> <p>Claw 0.59</p> <p>relation to size (growth). They also presented formulaic interpretations of the compound spine ®elds of the distal oviger articles. While they present data for ranges of article sizes and ratios by species, unfortunately their data for the percentage lengths of leg articles for C. macerrima are incorrect (presumably by typographical error). Fortunately, their ratios of leg article lengths to each other and to other body parts are correct. What they did conclude for the genus was that, owing to diOEerential rates of growth between diOEerent structures, relative proportions vary continuously through size ranges within species.</p> <p>I have examined the spine ®elds of the distal oviger articles of the Colossendeis gardineri holotype, and found them to conform with the de®nition given for C. macerrima by Fry and Hedgpeth (1969) (not subchelate; a distinct endal row of`needle’ spines and a ®eld of four or ®ve further rows of needle spines).</p> <p>It is against this backgroun d that members of the Colossendeis macerrima complex need to be interpreted. Ratios of leg articles of these taxa generally overlap, owing to their diOEerential growth. Colossendeis gardineri Carpenter, 1907 has only been collected as small specimensÐCarpenter’s type at 6.5 mm trunk length, and Stock’s (1986) specimen of which he claimed to`hardly see any diOEerences at all between’ it and the type. While the second tibia was reported as considerably shorter in relation to the other leg articles in C. gardineri than in C. macerrima s. str. (tarsus plus propodus plus claw 0.5 times the length of tibia 2 in C. gardineri, compared with up to 0.3 times in C. macerrima), this may well be a size-related feature, and leg article ratios (including tarsus to propodus ratio) may not be justi®able for splitting this taxon. Similar arguments may apply to the ratio of third to ®fth palp articles.</p> <p>A number of specimens of the Colossendeis macerrima complex were present in the Discovery material, all small (and none resembling C. leptorhynchus). In order to determine their identity, morphometric analysis was undertaken of this material, together with the type of C. gardineri, eight specimens of C. macerrima and two of C. minor, plus an undetermined specimen collected by Mauchline (1984), all from the north-east Atlantic (NHM collections: see Bamber and Thurston, 1995) together with four specimens of C. minor from waters oOE Fiji (courtesy of the MuseÂum National d’ Histoire Naturelle, Paris).</p> <p>For each specimen, the 3rd to 10th articles of the palp, the distal four articles of the 2nd or 3rd leg (where available), and the maximum and distal diameters of the proboscis were measured. In addition, the lengths of propodal spines/setae were measured in comparison with the propodal diameter. Attempts to quantify the`upcurve’ of the proboscis proved impractical.</p> <p>The lengths of the larger propodal sole spines of the Colossendeis gardineri holotype were approximately half the propodal diameter. Two specimens of the present material also had such large propodal spines and were tentatively attributed to this species; the remaining material bore propodal setae of length 0.03 times or less the propodal diameter, other than one C. macerrima (0.13 times) and the largest C. minor on which no propodal setae or spines were observed.</p> <p>Some other consistent diOEerences were apparent (table 2). Thus, the material attributed to Colossendeis minor showed a 10th to 9th palp article ratio (P10/P9) greater than 1.7, the ratio for the other taxa ranging between 1.2 and 1.6. The P5/P3 ratio distinguished all three taxa, being less than 1.5 for C. gardineri specimens (the type plus those of the present material with large propodal spines), greater than 1.9 for C. minor, and ranging from 1.6 to 1.93 for C. macerrima (thus slight overlap and standard deviations of parameters distinguishing Colossendeis between the last two). Ratios of distal to maximum diameter of the proboscis were less distinctive, being &lt;0.65 for C. gardineri, between 0.4 and 0.8 for C. minor, and between 0.7 and 1 for C. macerrima. The distinctions of the analysed material on these three parameters are shown in ®gure 3.</p> <p>macerrima, C. minor and C. gardineri.</p> <p>Ratios of distal leg articles were not distinctive. No characters were related to size.</p> <p>On the basis of these analyses, the Discovery material was attributed to Colossendeis gardineri (two specimens, representing the third occurrence of this species) and C. macerrima. Further, the specimen of Colossendeis sp. of Mauchline (1984) is now attributed to C. macerrima.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/D04E87BCFFD4FFBBFF08C7299439FD14	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Bamber, Roger N.	Bamber, Roger N. (2002): Bathypelagic pycnogonids (Arthropoda, Pycnogonida) from the Discovery deep-sea cruises. Journal of Natural History 36 (6): 715-727, DOI: 10.1080/00222930010025932, URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00222930010025932
D04E87BCFFDBFFBBFE09C38A9743FC45.text	D04E87BCFFDBFFBBFE09C38A9743FC45.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Colossendeis gardineri Carpenter 1907	<div><p>Colossendeis gardineri Carpenter, 1907</p> <p>Carpenter, 1907: 98 ±99, pl. 13, ®gures 20±24; Stock, 1986: 417, ®gure 5a±c.</p> <p>Material. Two specimens, sample 6414 (0±1400 m) (Registration No. NHM.2000.2257-225 8).</p> <p>Colossendeis gardineri has previously only been recorded from two specimens, Carpenter’s type from 823 m depth between the Seychelles and Rodriques in the Indian Ocean, and Stock’s (1986) specimen from 576 to 842 m, oOE St Vincent, West Indies.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/D04E87BCFFDBFFBBFE09C38A9743FC45	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Bamber, Roger N.	Bamber, Roger N. (2002): Bathypelagic pycnogonids (Arthropoda, Pycnogonida) from the Discovery deep-sea cruises. Journal of Natural History 36 (6): 715-727, DOI: 10.1080/00222930010025932, URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00222930010025932
D04E87BCFFDBFFBBFE10C57B927FFA77.text	D04E87BCFFDBFFBBFE10C57B927FFA77.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Colossendeis macerrima Wilson 1881	<div><p>Colossendeis macerrima Wilson, 1881</p> <p>Bamber and Thurston, 1995: 148; ®gure 9D.</p> <p>Material. One specimen, sample 9755#3; one specimen, sample 9781#1; one specimen, sample 10378#25; one specimen, sample 10378#26. Depth range (trawl depths) of this material, (1000)± 1525 m.</p> <p>This species is commonly recorded in benthic samples (see Bamber and Thurston, 1995), although Mauchline (1984) recorded a single, damaged specimen from a bathypelagic sample in the Rockall Trough. The present material is all of small individuals (but apparently with fully developed ovigers), which have proboscides upturned.</p> <p>The depth range of benthic material in the north-eastern Atlantic is 700±2000 m. The present ®nding of bathypelagic individuals, from the Porcupine Sea Bight and the Mid-Atlantic Ridge, helps account for the wide distribution of this species, known from the north and south Atlantic, Paci®c, Indian and Antarctic Oceans.</p></div> 	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/D04E87BCFFDBFFBBFE10C57B927FFA77	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Bamber, Roger N.	Bamber, Roger N. (2002): Bathypelagic pycnogonids (Arthropoda, Pycnogonida) from the Discovery deep-sea cruises. Journal of Natural History 36 (6): 715-727, DOI: 10.1080/00222930010025932, URL: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00222930010025932
