identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
D76587E07870FFEFC693F9E8FB642FFF.text	D76587E07870FFEFC693F9E8FB642FFF.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Euconnus claviger (Müller & Kunze) Muller & Kunze	<div><p>Morphology of Euconnus claviger (Müller &amp; Kunze), the type species of Euconnus (Napochus)</p><p>General body shape (Figs. 1–2) elongate, body distinctly constricted between head and pronotum but very weakly so between pronotum and elytra, strongly convex but with slightly flattened dorsum; appendages long and slender, vestiture of setae sparse, long and suberect, in addition to thin setae thick bristles are present on various body parts.</p><p>Head capsule (Figs. 1–2, 3–6) divided by occipital constriction into large anterior and small posterior part ('neck region'), the posterior part retracted into pronotum. Neck region much narrower than anterior part of head, short and not broadening towards foramen occipitale (Fig. 5; fo); the narrowest place of occipital constriction about as wide as half HW. Anterior part of head (Figs. 3, 5) approximately rhomboidal, broadest at eyes and narrowing both anteriorly and posteriorly. Dorsum of head (Fig. 3) convex; tempora about as long as compound eyes; vertex (Fig. 3; vt) transverse and nearly evenly convex, anteriorly confluent with subtrapezoidal and convex frons (Fig. 3; fr), which is steeply declining anteriorly; supraantennal tubercles barely raised; genae elongate, weakly convex. Clypeus (Figs. 3–4; cp) demarcated from frons by indistinct transverse frontoclypeal groove (Fig. 5; fcg), anterior margin of clypeus slightly concave and its anterolateral corners forming subtriangular teeth projecting anteriorly. Vestiture of head capsule composed mostly of thick bristles sparse on median part of vertex and frons and dense on genae, tempora, sides and posterior margin of vertex. Ventral side of head (Fig. 5) flattened; gular plate (Fig. 5; gp) in posterior part with indistinctly marked gular sutures (Fig. 5; gs), anterior part adjacent to posterior tentorial pits (Fig. 5; ptp) without sutures and indistinctly separated from submentum (Fig. 5; smn); posterior tentorial pits (Fig. 5; ptp) elongate and located anteriorly to transverse groove separating 'neck region' from anterior part of head.</p><p>Mouthparts (Figs. 3–6). Labrum (Figs. 3–4; lb) transverse, with rounded and anteriorly convergent sides and slightly emarginate anterior margin, dorsal surface with one transverse row of long setae located behind middle and a pair of anterolateral setae. Epipharynx (ventral surface of labrum) with six nearly straight peg-like median marginal sensilla (Fig. 4; mse) directed anteromesally. Mandibles (Figs. 3–4; md) symmetrical, moderately large, nearly planar and thin, subtriangular with broad base gradually narrowing distally into slender and strongly curved apical tooth, without subapical mesal teeth; prostheca rudimentary, composed of numerous dense and short trichia occupying narrow and short sub-basal mesal area. Maxilla (Figs. 4, 5–6) elongate, with transverse cardo (Fig. 6; cd); subtriangular and elongated basistipes (Fig. 6; bst); elongate and broad mediostipes (Fig. 11; mst); galea (Figs. 4, 6; gal) short, with long and dense trichia along distal margin; lacinia elongate, with long and dense trichia along distal and mesal margin; maxillary palp (Fig. 5; mxp) long, palpomere I small, about as long as broad, palpomere II strongly elongate and slightly thickening distally, pipe-like, palpomere III longer than I and strongly broadening distally, broadest near distal third; palpomere IV minute, subconical and slender, with elongate and pointed apical part. Labium (Figs. 5–6) with transverse submentum (Figs. 5–6; smn) laterally not demarcated from hypostome; mentum (Figs. 5–6; mn) subquadrate; prementum short, with indistinctly demarcated ligula (Fig. 6; lig) bearing pair of moderately long median setae; labial palps (Fig. 6; lp) shorter than mentum, palpomere I slightly transverse, palpomere II strongly elongate and broadening distally, palpomere III long and slender, narrowing distally. Posteriorly and laterally mouthparts demarcated by hypostomal ridges (Fig. 6; hr) which are strongly curved mesally and in posterior half nearly parallel.</p><p>Antennae (Figs. 1–2) slender, scape and pedicel elongate, antennomeres III–VI compactly assembled and nearly cylindrical, not narrowing proximally or distally; antennomeres VII–XI forming sharply delimited and loosely assembled club, antennomeres VII–X distinctly narrowing both proximally and distally, antennomere XI only slightly longer than broad. All antennomeres covered with sparse long setae.</p><p>Prothorax (Figs. 1–2, 7–9) strongly convex but with distinctly flattened pronotal dorsum, broadest at base, in dorsal view (Figs. 1, 7) elongate subtrapezoidal, with nearly straight anterior margin; lateral margins weakly rounded and strongly convergent anteriorly, with indistinct constriction in anterior 1/5; posterior margin expanded posteriorly at middle. Pronotum without lateral carinae or sharp edges but with short, low and slightly irregular sublateral carinae (Figs. 15, 7–8; slc); anterior and posterior corners of pronotum blunt but well-defined, anterior obtuse and posterior nearly right-angled. Base of pronotum (Figs. 7–8) with pair of very small and deep lateral antebasal pits (Figs. 7–8; lap) connected by indistinct, shallow transverse impression. Dorsal and dorsolateral surface of pronotum covered with long and erect bristles and thin setae concealed by bristles. Prosternum (Fig. 9) nearly 3 times shorter than pronotum, with basisternal part (Fig. 9; bst) rudimentary and not demarcated from procoxal cavities (Fig. 9; pcc) by carina; prosternal intercoxal process (Fig. 9; psp) present, carinate but weakly expanding ventrally and in intact specimens concealed between procoxae; procoxal sockets (Fig. 9; pcs) closed by broad posterolateral expansions of prosternum; profurcal (postcoxal) foveae (Fig. 9; pff) large and distinct. Hypomera (Fig. 9; hy) elongate, with nearly straight internal (mesal) margins, divided by entire hypomeral ridges (Fig. 9; hyr) into small subtriangular internal (adcoxal) part and large external part confluent laterally with sides of pronotum; pronotosternal sutures (Fig. 9; nss) entire and nearly straight.</p><p>Mesothorax (Figs. 10–12, 16–17). Mesonotum (Fig. 10) subtriangular in shape; mesoscutum (Fig. 10; sc2) strongly transverse, with two groups of several thick lateral bristles; scutoscutellar suture (Fig. 10; sss) wellmarked on the surface as transverse ridge; mesoscutellum (Fig. 10; scl2) not visible between bases of elytra in intact specimens, triangular with rounded posterior margin.</p><p>Mesoventrite (Figs. 11–12, 16–17) relatively short, much broader than long, with rudimentary anterior ridge (Fig. 12; ar); behind anterior ridge with lateral pair of strongly transverse impressions functioning as procoxal rests (Figs. 11–12; pcr) with setose posterior margins; mesoventral intercoxal process (Figs. 11–12, 16; msvp) slender and keel-like, strongly projecting ventrally, covered with polygonal microsculpture (Fig. 17); mesocoxal sockets (Fig. 12; mscs) located lateromesally on mesocoxal projections (Fig. 12; mcp); mesofurcal foveae (Fig. 12; msff) large and located submedially in mesocoxal cavities (Fig. 12; mscc), which are asetose. Prepectus (Fig. 12; pre) short, posterior part of mesanepisternum (Fig.16; aest2) only partly visible in ventral view, with setae distributed along its posterodorsal margin which is fused with asetose mesepimeron (Fig. 16; epm2) and with metanepisternum (Fig. 16; aest3). Mesothorax with dorsolateral foveae (Fig. 16; dlf) only; ventrolateral foveae absent.</p><p>Metathorax (Figs. 11, 13–16). Premetascutum (Figs. 14–15; prsc3) large, transverse; metascutum (Figs. 14–15; sc3) very large and transverse, with robust oblique lateral apodemes (Fig. 15; apo) on ventral side, in middle with broad and impressed median membranous area (Figs. 14–15; mma); alacristae (Fig. 14; alc) nearly as long as scutum; metascutellum (Figs. 14–15; scl3) rudimentary; postmetanotum (Figs. 14–15; psn3) large, strongly transverse.</p><p>Metaventrite (Figs. 11, 13, 16; v3) much longer than mesoventrite, subquadrate in shape, anteriorly fused with mesoventrite, lateral margins slightly rounded, lateral (admetacoxal) parts of posterior margin weakly concave, in middle posterior margin expanded posteriorly and forming subtrapezoidal metaventral intercoxal process (Fig. 13; mtvp) with slightly concave posteromedian margin. Metanepisterna (Fig. 16; aest3) not visible in ventral view, strongly elongate but anteriorly relatively broad, strongly narrowing posteriorly; metepimera (Figs. 11, 16; epm3) in ventral view visible posteriorly, elongate, slightly broadening posteriorly.</p><p>Metafurca (metendosternite) (Fig. 18) with short stem (Fig. 18; mtfs) and strongly divergent lateral furcal arms (Fig. 18; lmfa).</p><p>Elytra (Figs. 1–2, 19) oval, with rounded apices; humeral denticle absent; humeral callus moderately distinct, delimited from adsutural region by shallow basal impression; subhumeral line absent; elytral base with two distinct, circular and asetose basal foveae (Fig. 19; bef); elytral disc sparsely covered with long, curved and suberect setae.</p><p>Metathoracic wings about twice as long as elytra, with posterior margin bearing dense fringe of long setae; venation highly reduced and with few indistinct veins visible only in basal part of wing, homology difficult to interpret.</p><p>Abdomen (Figs. 20–22) elongate; abdominal sternites III–VIII (Fig. 20; st3–8) gradually narrowing towards abdominal apex, sternite III longest, with shallow metacoxal cavities (Fig. 20; mtcc) each demarcated posteriorly by curved coxal line (Fig. 20; cxl); suture between sternite VII and VIII (Fig. 20) less distinct than between remaining sternites. Propygidium (Fig. 21; prpg) hidden under elytra, strongly sclerotized and densely covered with transverse rows of trichia (Fig. 22); pygidium (Fig. 21; pg) exposed in intact specimens, strongly sclerotized, subtriangular with rounded apex, covered with scale-like microsculpture, each 'scale' (Fig. 22; s) with posterior row of short trichia, between 'scales' sparsely distributed convex porous fields (Fig. 22; pf).</p><p>Aedeagus (Fig. 23) symmetrical, elongate but relatively stout, with broad and bulbous median lobe and abruptly demarcated apical projections continuous with dorsal and ventral aedeagal walls; ostium concealed between apical projections; basal foramen (Fig. 23; bo) located in sub-basal region of dorsal aedeagal wall; ventral apical projection (Fig. 23; vap) short, plate-like, with subtrapezoidal apical portion; dorsal apical projection (Fig. 23; dap) long, with subtrapezoidal apex. Parameres (Fig. 23; pm) free (i.e., not fused with median lobe), broad, each with two approximate apical setae. Internal armature of aedeagus in transparent mounts (Fig. 23) visible as darkly sclerotized complex of sclerites, containing pair of hook-like internal lateral projections (Fig. 23; ilp) in repose partly protruding from ostium at each side of ventral apical projection.</p><p>Remarks. Several structures, previously described in detail for Euconnus s. str. (Jałoszyński 2012a), were omitted from illustrations and descriptions presented here. The reason was the small number of specimens available for dissections, and therefore some structures remained hidden when others were exposed and documented by SEM, and some others were partly damaged during disarticulations. However, some of such structures, even if not possible to visualize in photographs suitable for publication, were examined, and the female ovipositor, spermatheca, and male terminalia were found to be similar (i.e., not substantially different in general structure) to those of Euconnus s. str.</p><p>Examination of the Australian species revealed that there are two pairs of lateral projections of the endophallus. The internal pair is always more distinct in the specimens studied, usually also larger and darker than the external lateral projections. The latter are lightly pigmented and may be obscured by the internal pair or are indiscernible in all or some specimens. In Euconnus claviger only one pair of lateral projections was found, and they are dark and distinct (Fig. 23). Therefore, they are here interpreted as internal lateral projections and the external pair in the type species of Napochus may be concealed by large internal projections, being indiscernible in transparent preparations or are missing. Aedeagi of the Australian species show distinct similarities in structure to the copulatory organ of E. claviger; they all have flattened ventral and dorsal apical projections, lateral projections, and symmetrical dark median components of endophallus. The slightly asymmetrical median component of the endophallus visible in the studied specimen of E. claviger (Fig. 23) seems to be dislocated. In many specimens studied at various times by me this structure was found to be quite variable and prone to distortion.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/D76587E07870FFEFC693F9E8FB642FFF	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Jałoszyński, Paweł	Jałoszyński, Paweł (2015): Taxonomy of ' Euconnus complex'. Part III. Morphology of Euconnus subgenus Napochus and revision of the Australian species (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae, Scydmaeninae). Zootaxa 3925 (1): 1-24, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3925.1.1
D76587E07879FFE8C693FD72FDF32CBA.text	D76587E07879FFE8C693FD72FDF32CBA.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Euconnus (Napochus) palmwoodianus Franz	<div><p>Euconnus (Napochus) palmwoodianus Franz</p><p>(Figs. 24, 26, 35–38, 57–58)</p><p>Euconnus (Napochus) palmwoodianus Franz, 1975: 161, Fig. 136.</p><p>Type material studied. Holotype: AUSTRALIA (Queensland): ♂, four labels (Fig. 26): "Umg. Maipoton (sic!) / Queensld., Austr. / lg. H.Franz 1970 " with "Pa76" on the reverse side [white, printed; reverse handwritten], " Euconnus / ( Napochus) / palmwoodianus m. / det. H. Franz" [white, handwritten and printed], " Typus " [red, handwritten], " SAMA Database / No. 25-036980" [white, printed] (SAM).</p><p>Additional material studied (14 ♂♂). 4 ♂♂, Queensland, 11.45S, 142.35E, Heathlands, 22.iii - 25.iv. 1992, Malaise trap in dump, open forest, T. McLeod leg.; 3 ♂♂, Queensland, 11.51S, 142.38E, 12 km SSE Heathlands, 22.iii - 25.iv1992, Malaise trap in closed forest, T. McLeod leg.; Queensland, 4 ♂♂, 11.45S, 142.35E, Heathlands, 26.i. - 29.ii.1992, Malaise trap in dump open forest, P. Feeney leg.; 2 ♂♂, Queensland, 11.45S, 142.35S, Heathlands, 1-21.v.1992, Malaise trap in dump open forest, P. Feeney leg.; 1 ♂, Queensland, 11.51S, 142.38E, 12 km SSE Heathlands, Malaise trap in closed forest, 1-21.iii.1992, P. Feeney leg. (specimens in ANIC and cPJ).</p><p>Diagnosis. Large species, BL 1.38–1.63 mm; aedeagus in ventral view with very narrow ventral apical projection gradually narrowing from base to apex and reaching apex of dorsal apical projection, internal lateral projections slender, as long as ventral apical projection and convergent distally; external lateral projections indiscernible; in lateral view both ventral and dorsal apical projections strongly curved dorsally; parameres with strongly expanded apices.</p><p>Description. Body of male (Fig. 24) strongly convex but with slightly flattened elytral dorsum, elongate, with long appendages, BL 1.38–1.63 mm (mean 1.49 mm); glossy, uniformly light brown; vestiture slightly lighter than cuticle.</p><p>Head rhomboidal, broadest at eyes, HL 0.28–0.30 mm (mean 0.29 mm), HW 0.28–0.33 mm (mean 0.30 mm); vertex and frons confluent, convex; supraantennal tubercles feebly marked; eyes large, strongly convex and coarsely faceted. Punctures on vertex and frons variable, from fine and inconspicuous to distinct; setae long, dense, suberect to erect, additionally tempora and vertex with long and dense bristles directed posteriorly. Antennae short, AnL 0.58–0.68 mm (mean 0.61 mm); antennomeres I–II elongate, III–VII slightly transverse and VIII–X strongly transverse, antennomere XI slightly longer than wide.</p><p>Pronotum in dorsal view subtrapezoidal, broadest at base and strongly narrowing anteriorly, PL 0.33–0.40 mm (mean 0.37 mm), PW 0.35–0.43 mm (mean 0.39 mm); basal pits distinct, transverse groove shallow, in some specimens barely discernible. Punctures on pronotal disc variable but always fine; setae fine and obscured by dense, long and thick bristles (especially on sides).</p><p>Elytra suboval and slightly flattened, broadest nearly in or slightly anterior to middle, EL 0.78–0.93 mm (mean 0.83 mm), EW 0.58–0.70 mm (mean 0.64 mm), EI 1.26–1.39; basal impressions shallow but distinct, humeri elongate; apices separately rounded. Punctures on elytral disc fine and shallow; setae long, sparse and strongly erect. Hind wings well-developed, twice as long as elytra.</p><p>Legs long and slender; unmodified.</p><p>Aedeagus (Figs. 35–38) stout, AeL 0.32 mm, in ventral view with abruptly delimited and long apical part; ventral apical projection very narrow, subtriangular, gradually narrowing distally and in ventral view reaching apex of dorsal apical projection; both ventral and dorsal apical projections strongly curved dorsally; internal lateral projections long, slender and subtriangular, distinctly convergent distally; external lateral projections indiscernible. Parameres broad, in lateral view with strongly broadened apical parts, each with 3–4 long apical setae and several short and thin subapical setae.</p><p>Female. Unknown or indistinguishable from E. pisoniae (see remarks).</p><p>Distribution. SE and N Queensland (Figs. 57–58).</p><p>FIGURES 35–46. Napochus of Australia; aedeagus in ventral (35, 37, 39, 41, 43, 45) and lateral (36, 38, 40, 42, 44, 46) views. Euconnus palmwoodianus (Franz), distorted aedeagus of holotype (35–36) and intact aedeagus of non-type (37–38), E. pisoniae Franz (39–40), E. setiphallus sp. n. (41–42), E. yadhaigana sp. n. (43–44), E. microlaminatus sp. n. (45–46).</p><p>Remarks. The label reads "Umg. [i.e., environ] Maipoton [misspelled Mapleton]", while Franz (1975) gives the collecting site as a forest east of Palmwoods. He also supplements the collecting data with day and month not specified on the label: the 11th of September; and information that the holotype male was taken from rotten wood. The holotype, collected near the Sunshine Coast, is slightly larger than specimens coming from Cape York. Its aedeagus is distorted and although aedeagi of specimens from N Queensland are very similar (even specimens with similarly collapsed median lobe were seen), it is necessary to study additional, well-preserved material from Palmwoods to confirm conspecificity. Euconnus palmwoodianus and E. pisoniae are the largest species of Australian Napochus, all new species described below are distinctly smaller. However, these two species are so similar that only their aedeagi provide unambiguous diagnostic characters. It was not possible to associate any females with males of either species, males were found in the same localities, so the criterion of co-occurrence could not be used to help in identifications.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/D76587E07879FFE8C693FD72FDF32CBA	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Jałoszyński, Paweł	Jałoszyński, Paweł (2015): Taxonomy of ' Euconnus complex'. Part III. Morphology of Euconnus subgenus Napochus and revision of the Australian species (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae, Scydmaeninae). Zootaxa 3925 (1): 1-24, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3925.1.1
D76587E0787CFFE9C693FE20FAB02DC5.text	D76587E0787CFFE9C693FE20FAB02DC5.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Euconnus (Napochus) pisoniae Franz	<div><p>Euconnus (Napochus) pisoniae Franz</p><p>(Figs. 25, 27, 39–40, 59)</p><p>Euconnus (Napochus) pisoniae Franz, 1975: 161, Fig. 137a, b.</p><p>Type material studied. Holotype: AUSTRALIA (Queensland): ♂, four labels (Fig. 27): "Trapped by sticky seeds / of Pisonia brunnoniana / Cairns dist.: F. P Dodd" [white, printed], " Euconnus / ( Napochus) / pisoniae m. / det. H. Franz" [white, handwritten and printed], " Typus " [red, handwritten], " SAMA Database / No. 25-036981" [white, printed] (SAM).</p><p>Additional material studied (4 ♂♂). 1 ♂, Queensland, 11.51S, 142.38E, 12 km SSE Heathlands, 1.- 21.iii.1992, Malaise trap in closed forest, P. Feeney leg.; 2 ♂♂, Queensland, 11.51S, 142.38E, 12 km SSE Heathlands, 26.i. - 29.ii.1992, Malaise trap in closed forest, P. Feeney leg.; 1 ♂, Queensland, 16.05S, 145.27E, 30 m, 2 km WSW Cape Tribulation, 1.-28.ii.1996, flight intercept trap, L. Umback leg. (specimens in ANIC and cPJ).</p><p>Diagnosis. Large species, BL 1.50–1.55 mm; aedeagus in ventral view with moderately broad ventral apical projection narrowing from submedian area to apex and reaching apex of dorsal apical projection, internal lateral projections slender, shorter than ventral apical projection and curved mesally; external lateral projections broad and rounded; in lateral view ventral apical projection slightly and dorsal apical projection strongly curved dorsally; parameres with only slightly expanded apices.</p><p>Description. Body of male (Fig. 25) strongly convex but with slightly flattened elytral dorsum, elongate, with long appendages, BL 1.50–1.55 mm (mean 1.52 mm); glossy, uniformly light brown; vestiture slightly lighter than cuticle.</p><p>Head rhomboidal, broadest at eyes, HL 0.30–0.31 mm (mean 0.30 mm), HW 0.30–0.33 mm (mean 0.32 mm); vertex and frons confluent, convex; supraantennal tubercles feebly marked; eyes large, strongly convex and coarsely faceted. Punctures on vertex and frons fine and inconspicuous; setae long, dense, suberect to erect, additionally tempora and vertex with long and dense bristles directed posteriorly. Antennae short, AnL 0.60–0.63 mm (mean 0.62 mm); antennomeres I–II elongate, III–VII slightly transverse and VIII–X strongly transverse, antennomere XI slightly longer than wide.</p><p>Pronotum in dorsal view subtrapezoidal, broadest at base and strongly narrowing anteriorly, PL 0.38 mm, PW 0.40; antebasal pits and transverse groove distinct. Punctures on pronotal disc fine and inconspicuous; setae fine and obscured by dense, long and thick bristles (especially on sides).</p><p>Elytra suboval and slightly flattened, broadest near middle, EL 0.83–0.88 mm (mean 0.84 mm), EW 0.65–0.68 mm (mean 0.67 mm), EI 1.24–1.27; basal impressions shallow but distinct, humeri elongate; apices separately rounded. Punctures on elytral disc fine and shallow; setae long, sparse and strongly erect. Hind wings welldeveloped, twice as long as elytra.</p><p>Legs long and slender; unmodified.</p><p>Aedeagus (Figs. 39–40) stout, AeL 0.24 mm, in ventral view with indistinctly delimited and short apical portion; ventral apical projection moderately broad, subtriangular, gradually narrowing distally but slightly constricted near base, in ventral view reaching apex of dorsal apical projection; only dorsal apical projection strongly curved dorsally; internal lateral projections long, slender, each with broad base and narrow distal portion, distinctly curved mesodistally; external lateral projections broad and rounded. Parameres broad, in lateral view with slightly broadened apical parts, each with 3 long apical setae and several short and thin subapical setae.</p><p>Female. Unknown or indistinguishable from E. palmwoodianus (see remarks for the latter species).</p><p>Distribution. N Queensland (Fig. 59).</p><p>Remarks. The aedeagus illustrated by Franz (1975: Fig. 137a, b) is similar to that found in the holotype only in lateral view, but rather dissimilar in the dorsal view, in which the median lobe and internal sclerotized structures have in fact different shape, and there are no asymmetrical, elongate sclerites that were sketched by Franz.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/D76587E0787CFFE9C693FE20FAB02DC5	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Jałoszyński, Paweł	Jałoszyński, Paweł (2015): Taxonomy of ' Euconnus complex'. Part III. Morphology of Euconnus subgenus Napochus and revision of the Australian species (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae, Scydmaeninae). Zootaxa 3925 (1): 1-24, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3925.1.1
D76587E0787DFFE9C693FEB0FEB72BA5.text	D76587E0787DFFE9C693FEB0FEB72BA5.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Euconnus (Napochus) setiphallus	<div><p>Euconnus (Napochus) setiphallus sp. n.</p><p>(Figs. 28, 41–42, 60)</p><p>Type material studied. Holotype: AUSTRALIA (Queensland): ♂, three labels: " 11.45S 142.35E / Heathlands QLD / 21Nov. - 9Dec.1992 / P.Zborowski,W.Dressler / MALAISE #2 dump / open forest" [white, printed], "Aust. Nat. / Ins. Coll." [green, printed], " Euconnus / ( Napochus) / setiphallus m. / det. P. JAŁOSZYŃSKI, '15" [red, printed] (ANIC).</p><p>Diagnosis. Small species, BL 1.10 mm; aedeagus in ventral view with moderately broad ventral apical projection broadening from base to subapical region and with rounded, subtriangular apex, not reaching apex of dorsal apical projection, internal lateral projections broadly subtriangular and with rounded apices, much shorter than ventral apical projection and not convergent distally; external lateral projections barely discernible, rounded; in lateral view ventral apical projections not curved, and dorsal apical projection only slightly curved dorsally; parameres with apices barely broadened.</p><p>Description. Body of male (Fig. 28) strongly convex but with slightly flattened elytral dorsum, elongate, with long appendages, BL 1.10 mm; glossy, uniformly light brown; vestiture slightly lighter than cuticle.</p><p>Head rhomboidal, broadest at eyes, HL 0.20 mm, HW 0.24 mm; vertex and frons confluent, convex; supraantennal tubercles feebly marked; eyes large, strongly convex and coarsely faceted. Punctures on vertex and frons distinct but small and shallow; setae long, dense, suberect to erect, additionally tempora and vertex with long and dense bristles directed posteriorly. Antennae short, AnL 0.48 mm; antennomeres I–II elongate, III–VII slightly transverse and VIII–X strongly transverse, antennomere XI slightly broader than long.</p><p>Pronotum in dorsal view subtrapezoidal, broadest at base and strongly narrowing anteriorly, PL 0.28 mm, PW 0.29 mm; basal pits distinct, transverse groove barely discernible. Punctures on pronotal disc fine and inconspicuous; setae fine and on sides obscured by dense, long and thick bristles.</p><p>Elytra suboval and slightly flattened, broadest near middle, EL 0.63 mm, EW 0.50 mm, EI 1.25; basal impressions shallow but distinct, humeri elongate; apices separately rounded. Punctures on elytral disc fine and shallow; setae long, sparse and strongly erect. Hind wings well-developed, twice as long as elytra.</p><p>Legs long and slender; unmodified.</p><p>Aedeagus (Figs. 41–42) stout, AeL 0.25 mm, in ventral view with abruptly delimited and long apical part; ventral apical projection narrow at base, gradually broadening distally and in subapical region again narrowing to form broadly subtriangular apex, in ventral view not reaching apex of dorsal apical projection; only dorsal apical projections slightly bent dorsally at an obtuse angle; internal lateral projections broad, subtriangular and rounded at apices; external lateral projections short, broad and rounded. Parameres moderately broad, in lateral view with barely broadened apical parts, each with 3 long apical setae; short setae are also distributed along median subapical region of dorsal aedeagal wall.</p><p>Female. Unknown or indistinguishable from similar species (see discussion).</p><p>Distribution. N Queensland (Fig. 60).</p><p>Etymology. The name setiphallus refers to the group of tiny setae located in the subapical region of the dorsal aedeagal wall.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/D76587E0787DFFE9C693FEB0FEB72BA5	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Jałoszyński, Paweł	Jałoszyński, Paweł (2015): Taxonomy of ' Euconnus complex'. Part III. Morphology of Euconnus subgenus Napochus and revision of the Australian species (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae, Scydmaeninae). Zootaxa 3925 (1): 1-24, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3925.1.1
D76587E0787DFFF6C693F916FDA328D7.text	D76587E0787DFFF6C693F916FDA328D7.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Euconnus (Napochus) yadhaigana	<div><p>Euconnus (Napochus) yadhaigana sp. n.</p><p>(Figs. 29, 43–44, 61)</p><p>Type material studied. Holotype: AUSTRALIA (Queensland): ♂, three labels: " 17.52S 146.04E QLD / S1 Mission Beach / 4 Nov-2 Dec 1996 / M.Cermak. 40m / Pitfall traps" [white, printed], " ANIC / specimen" [green, printed], " Euconnus / ( Napochus) / yadhaigana m. / det. P. JAŁOSZYŃSKI, '15" [red, printed] (ANIC). Paratypes (2 ♂♂): 1 ♂, " 17.52S 146.04E QLD / S1 Mission Beach / 4 Mar-1 Apr 1996 /M.Cermak. 40m / FI Trap (JCU)" [white, printed], " ANIC / specimen" [green, printed]; 1 ♂, " 13.44S 143.20E QLD / 11km WbyN of Bald Hill / McIlwraith Range / 27 June-12 July 1989 / T.A.Weir 520m / search party campsite" [white, printed], "Berlesate / ANIC 1114 / leaf litter &amp; / flood debris / closed forest" [white, printed], " ANIC / specimen" [green, printed] (paratypes in ANIC and cPJ).</p><p>Diagnosis. Small species, BL 1.15–1.16 mm; aedeagus in ventral view with broad ventral apical projection gradually broadening from base to subapical region and then rapidly narrowing toward subtriangular apex, not reaching apex of dorsal apical projection, internal lateral projections moderately broad, subtriangular, distinctly shorter than ventral apical projection and divergent distally; external lateral projections barely discernible; in lateral view ventral apical projection not curved, while dorsal apical projection strongly curved dorsally; parameres with slightly expanded apices.</p><p>Description. Body of male (Fig. 29) strongly convex but with slightly flattened elytral dorsum, elongate, with long appendages, BL 1.15–1.16 mm (mean 1.15 mm); glossy, uniformly light brown; vestiture slightly lighter than cuticle.</p><p>Head rhomboidal, broadest at eyes, HL 0.20, HW 0.25; vertex and frons confluent, convex; supraantennal tubercles feebly marked; eyes large, strongly convex and coarsely faceted. Punctures on vertex and frons distinct but small and shallow; setae long, dense, suberect to erect, additionally tempora and vertex with long and dense bristles directed posteriorly. Antennae short, AnL 0.49–0.50 mm (mean 0.50 mm); antennomeres I–II elongate, III–VII slightly transverse, VII about as long as broad, VIII–X strongly transverse, antennomere XI about as long as broad.</p><p>Pronotum in dorsal view subtrapezoidal, broadest at base and strongly narrowing anteriorly, PL 0.28–0.30 mm (mean 0.29 mm), PW 0.31; antebasal pits and transverse groove barely discernible. Punctures on pronotal disc fine and inconspicuous; setae fine and on sides obscured by dense, long and thick bristles.</p><p>Elytra suboval and slightly flattened, broadest near middle, EL 0.65–0.68 mm (mean 0.66 mm), EW 0.51–0.55 mm (mean 0.54 mm), EI 1.20–1.27; basal impressions shallow but distinct, humeri elongate; apices separately rounded. Punctures on elytral disc fine and shallow; setae long, sparse and strongly erect. Hind wings welldeveloped, twice as long as elytra.</p><p>Legs long and slender; unmodified.</p><p>Aedeagus (Figs. 43–44) relatively slender, AeL 0.25 mm, in ventral view with abruptly delimited and long apical part; ventral apical projection elongate and broad, pentagonal with all corners well-marked, gradually broadening from base to subapical region and then rapidly narrowing to form broadly triangular apex, in ventral view not reaching apex of dorsal apical projection; only dorsal apical projection bent dorsally at an obtuse angle; internal and external lateral projections similar in shape (external projections barely discernible), subtriangular and divergent distally. Parameres narrow, in lateral view with barely broadened apical parts, each with 2 long apical setae.</p><p>Female. Unknown or indistinguishable from similar species (see discussion).</p><p>Distribution. N Queensland (Fig. 61).</p><p>Etymology. The name yadhaigana (a noun in apposition) refers to the Aboriginal tribe inhabiting the Cape York Peninsula, Yadhaigana people.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/D76587E0787DFFF6C693F916FDA328D7	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Jałoszyński, Paweł	Jałoszyński, Paweł (2015): Taxonomy of ' Euconnus complex'. Part III. Morphology of Euconnus subgenus Napochus and revision of the Australian species (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae, Scydmaeninae). Zootaxa 3925 (1): 1-24, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3925.1.1
D76587E07862FFF7C693F9CBFEA1283F.text	D76587E07862FFF7C693F9CBFEA1283F.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Euconnus (Napochus) microlaminatus	<div><p>Euconnus (Napochus) microlaminatus sp. n.</p><p>(Figs. 30, 45–46, 62)</p><p>Type material studied. Holotype: AUSTRALIA (Queensland): ♂, four labels: " 13.44S 143.20E QLD / 11km WbyN of Bald Hill / McIlwraith Range / 27 June-12 July 1989 / T.A.Weir 520m / search party campsite" [white, printed], "ex dead / Pandanus / leaves" [white, printed], " ANIC / specimen" [green, printed], " Euconnus / ( Napochus) / microlaminatus m. / det. P. JAŁOSZYŃSKI, '15" [red, printed] (ANIC). Paratypes (2 ♂♂): same data as for holotype except one with additional label " ANIC 1124 / F.I.T. with trough / closed forest" and the other one with "ex / light / trap" [both white, printed] (paratypes in ANIC and cPJ).</p><p>Diagnosis. Small species, BL 1.05–1.10 mm; aedeagus in ventral view with very small and narrow ventral apical projection gradually broadening from base to subapical region and rounded at apex, not reaching apex of dorsal apical projection, internal lateral projections slender, much shorter than ventral apical projection and convergent but with externally curved apices; external lateral projections barely discernible; in lateral view ventral apical projection not curved, while dorsal apical projection strongly curved dorsally; parameres not expanded at apices.</p><p>Description. Body of male (Fig. 30) strongly convex but with distinctly flattened elytral dorsum, elongate, with long appendages, BL 1.05–1.10 mm (mean 1.08 mm); glossy, uniformly light brown; vestiture slightly lighter than cuticle.</p><p>Head rhomboidal, broadest at eyes, HL 0.20 mm, HW 0.25 mm; vertex and frons confluent, convex; supraantennal tubercles feebly marked; eyes large, strongly convex and coarsely faceted. Punctures on vertex and frons fine and inconspicuous; setae long, dense, suberect to erect, additionally tempora and vertex with long and dense bristles directed posteriorly. Antennae short, AnL 0.48–0.50 mm (mean 0.48 mm); antennomeres I–II only slightly elongate, III–VII slightly transverse and VIII–X strongly transverse, antennomere XI about as long as wide.</p><p>Pronotum in dorsal view subtrapezoidal, broadest at base and strongly narrowing anteriorly, PL 0.25–0.28 mm (mean 0.27 mm), PW 0.28–0.30 mm (mean 0.28 mm); antebasal pits barely discernible, transverse groove distinct. Punctures on pronotal disc fine and inconspicuous; setae fine and on sides obscured by dense, long and thick bristles.</p><p>Elytra suboval and slightly flattened or even slightly impressed along suture near anterior third, broadest near middle, EL 0.60–0.63 mm (mean 0.62 mm), EW 48 mm, EI 1.26–1.32; basal impressions shallow but distinct, humeri elongate; apices separately rounded. Punctures on elytral disc distinct, especially on adsutural impressed area, but small and shallow; setae long, sparse and strongly erect. Hind wings well-developed, twice as long as elytra.</p><p>Legs long and slender; unmodified.</p><p>Aedeagus (Figs. 45–46) very stout, AeL 0.13 mm, in ventral view with abruptly delimited and short apical part; ventral apical projection elongate and narrow at base, gradually broadening to subapical region and with round apex, in ventral view not reaching apex of dorsal apical projection; only dorsal apical projection curved dorsally; internal and external lateral projections similar in shape, subtriangular with hook-shaped and divergent apices. Parameres broad, in lateral view apical parts not broadened, each with 2–3 long apical and subapical setae and with 1–2 short and thin subapical setae.</p><p>Female. Unknown or indistinguishable from similar species (see discussion).</p><p>Distribution. N Queensland (Fig. 62).</p><p>Etymology. The name microlaminatus refers to the very small ventral apical projection (or a plate, lamina) of the aedeagus.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/D76587E07862FFF7C693F9CBFEA1283F	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Jałoszyński, Paweł	Jałoszyński, Paweł (2015): Taxonomy of ' Euconnus complex'. Part III. Morphology of Euconnus subgenus Napochus and revision of the Australian species (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae, Scydmaeninae). Zootaxa 3925 (1): 1-24, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3925.1.1
D76587E07863FFF4C693FAA3FC2F2F52.text	D76587E07863FFF4C693FAA3FC2F2F52.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Euconnus (Napochus) feeneyi	<div><p>Euconnus (Napochus) feeneyi sp. n.</p><p>(Figs. 31–34, 47–56, 63–64)</p><p>Diagnosis. Small species, BL 1.00– 1.38 mm; aedeagus in ventral view with long and narrow ventral apical projection either gradually broadening from base to subapical region or with nearly parallel sides, in both cases not reaching apex of dorsal apical projection, internal lateral projections slender, with pointed apices, distinctly shorter than ventral apical projection and distinctly or slightly convergent distally; external lateral projections broad and with rounded apices or distinctly narrowing distally and with subtriangular apices; in lateral view only dorsal apical projections curved dorsally, but at an obtuse angle; parameres with slightly expanded apices.</p><p>Etymology. This species is dedicated to Paul Feeney, the leader of the Royal Geographical Society's 1992 Cape York Scientific Expedition, during which many specimens used in the present study were collected. His name is misspelled on all labels as Feehney, and in this incorrect form cited for all type specimens in the present paper.</p><p>Remarks. Euconnus feeneyi is here divided into two subspecies, Euconnus feeneyi feeneyi and Euconnus feeneyi parallelilaminatus ssp. n. described below, based solely on genital structures.</p><p>Both subspecies of Euconnus feeneyi show variability in the body length and proportions of various body parts, a phenomenon rarely encountered within Cyrtoscydmini . A relatively large number of specimens of Euconnus feeneyi feeneyi made it possible to analyze the distribution of the body length, and it was found that in the studied material it is distinctly bimodal (Fig 55), with two overlapping distributions showing peaks at 1.10–1.15 and 1.25–1.30 mm. Specimens from and near these two peaks were initially (before studying the aedeagi) assigned to two separate morphospecies (provisionally named "short" and "long"), but there were also specimens showing intermediate length and intermediate body shape. The "short" specimens are also stouter than the largest "long" specimens. This variability was illustrated for Euconnus feeneyi parallelilaminatus (Figs. 33–34), but a very similar difference between the smallest and the largest individuals was found in both subspecies. All specimens come from the tip of Cape York, and "short" and "long" males were often found in the same trap. As demonstrated in Fig. 56, the body length and elytral width increase gradually from the smallest to largest individuals and it is not possible to tell whether individuals from the middle area of this morphocline belong to the "short" or "long" morphotype. Therefore, they are all treated as belonging to one, externally variable species, Euconnus feeneyi, and one of the "short" males is fixed as a holotype of Euconnus feeneyi feeneyi . Since differences in the aedeagal structures do not form a morphocline but two clear and easily distinguishable genital morphotypes, two subspecies are proposed. It should be noted that they are sympatric and show a great external variation, and therefore this taxonomic problem requires further study, including genetic analysis.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/D76587E07863FFF4C693FAA3FC2F2F52	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Jałoszyński, Paweł	Jałoszyński, Paweł (2015): Taxonomy of ' Euconnus complex'. Part III. Morphology of Euconnus subgenus Napochus and revision of the Australian species (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae, Scydmaeninae). Zootaxa 3925 (1): 1-24, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3925.1.1
D76587E07861FFF2C693FF6BFB232CBA.text	D76587E07861FFF2C693FF6BFB232CBA.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Euconnus (Napochus) feeneyi subsp. feeneyi	<div><p>Euconnus (Napochus) feeneyi feeneyi sp. n.</p><p>(Figs. 31–32, 47–50, 55–56, 63)</p><p>Type material studied. Holotype: AUSTRALIA (Queensland): ♂, three labels: " 11.45S 142.35E QLD / Heathlands 22Mar. - / 25Apr.1992 T.McLeod / MALAISE #1 barracks / closed scrub(=heath)" [white, printed], " ANIC / specimen" [green, printed], " Euconnus / ( Napochus) / feeneyi feeneyi m. / det. P. JAŁOSZYŃSKI, '15" [red, printed] (ANIC). Paratypes (57 ♂♂): 3 ♂♂, same data as for holotype; 1 ♂, same data as for holotype except "dump open forest"; 7 ♂♂, " 11.51S 142.38E QLD / 12km SSE Heathlands / 22.Mar-25.Apr 1992 / T.McLeod, closed / forest,MALAISE#3&amp;#4" [white, printed]; 6 ♂♂, " 11.45S 142.35E QLD / Heathlands 26Jan. - / 29Feb.1992 P.Feehney / MALAISE #2 dump / open forest" [white, printed]; 3 ♂♂, " 11.45S 142.35E QLD / Heathlands 26Jan. - / 29Feb.1992 P.Feehney / MALAISE #1 barracks / closed scrub(=heath)" [white, printed]; 12 ♂♂, " 11.45S 142.35E QLD / Heathlands 1-21Mar. / 1992 P.Feehney / MALAISE #2 dump / open forest" [white, printed]; 6 ♂♂, " 11.45S 142.35E QLD / Heathlands 25Apr. - / 7June 1992 T.McLeod / MALAISE #2 dump / open forest" [white, printed]; 10 ♂♂, " 11.51S 142.38E QLD / 12km SSE Heathlands / 1 -21Mar. / 1992 / P.Feehney closed / forest MALAISE #3#4" [white, printed]; 2 ♂♂, " 11.51S 142.38E QLD / 12km SSE Heathlands / 26Jan-1 Mar 1992 / P.Feehney. closed / forest MALAISE #3#4 [white, printed]; 6 ♂♂, " 11.39S 142.27E QLD / Cockatoo Ck. Xing / 17km NW Heathlands / 1-21 Mar. 1992 / P.Feehney / MALAISE #5 open forest" [white, printed]; 1 ♂, " 11.39S 142.27E QLD / Cockatoo Ck. Xing / 17km NW Heathlands / 22 Mar-25 Apr 1992 / T.McLeod, open forest / MALAISE #5" [white, printed] (all paratypes with green printed labels " ANIC specimen" or "Aust. nat. Ins. Coll."; specimens in ANIC and cPJ).</p><p>Diagnosis. BL 1.00– 1.38 mm; aedeagus in ventral view with long and narrow ventral apical projection gradually broadening from base to subapical region, external lateral projections broad and with rounded apices.</p><p>Description. Body of male (Figs. 31–32) strongly convex but with slightly flattened elytral dorsum, elongate, with long appendages, BL 1.00– 1.38 mm (mean 1.18 mm); glossy, uniformly light brown; vestiture slightly lighter than cuticle.</p><p>Head short rhomboidal, broadest at eyes, HL 0.20–0.26 mm (mean 0.23 mm), HW 0.23–0.30 mm (mean 0.25 mm); vertex and frons confluent, convex; supraantennal tubercles feebly marked; eyes large, strongly convex and coarsely faceted. Punctures on vertex and frons fine and inconspicuous; setae long, dense, suberect to erect, additionally tempora and vertex with long and dense bristles directed posteriorly. Antennae short, AnL 0.43–0.60 mm (mean 0.52 mm); antennomeres I–II slightly elongate, III–VII slightly transverse and VIII–X strongly transverse, antennomere XI about as long as broad or slightly longer than wide.</p><p>Pronotum in dorsal view subtrapezoidal, broadest at base and strongly narrowing anteriorly, PL 0.25–0.33 mm (mean 0.29 mm), PW 0.28–0.35 mm (mean 0.32 mm); antebasal pits and transverse groove distinct. Punctures on pronotal disc fine; setae fine and on sides obscured by dense, long and thick bristles.</p><p>Elytra suboval and slightly flattened or even slightly impressed along suture in anterior third, broadest nearly in or slightly anterior to middle, EL 0.55–0.80 mm (mean 0.66 mm), EW 0.43–0.60 mm (mean 0.53 mm), EI 1.14–1.36; basal impressions shallow but distinct, humeri elongate; apices separately rounded. Punctures on elytral disc fine and shallow; setae long, sparse and strongly erect. Hind wings well-developed, twice as long as elytra.</p><p>Legs long and slender; unmodified.</p><p>Aedeagus (Figs. 47–50) stout, AeL 0.18 mm, in ventral view with abruptly delimited and short apical part; ventral apical projection strongly elongate and narrow, from base or from sub-basal region gradually broadening to subapical region and with round apex with variously distinct tip, in ventral view not reaching apex of dorsal apical projection; only dorsal apical projection curved dorsally; internal lateral projections long and pointed, slightly convergent distally; external lateral projections broad and with rounded apical parts. Parameres broad, in lateral view apical parts slightly broadened, each with 2 long apical setae.</p><p>Female. Unknown or indistinguishable from similar species (see discussion).</p><p>Distribution. N Queensland (Fig. 63).</p><p>Remarks. Despite the surprising variability of the body shape and length, the aedeagi of the holotype and 56 out of 57 paratype males of Euconnus feeneyi feeneyi are uniform and if any variation was observed, it can be attributed to various distortions during preserving and preparation. In one male, however, illustrated in Fig. 31, the aedeagus differs in the shape of internal lateral projections (Figs. 49–50). They are much more slender and have different shape than those in the holotype. All other details, as the shape of the ventral and dorsal apical projections and external lateral projections, are the same as in the aedeagus of the holotype. External characters and measurements of this specimen fall within the variability range of all other specimens, and this unique beetle was collected together with others, with broader external projections (i.e., 12km SSE Heathlands, 11.51S 142.38E, 26.i.-1.iii.1992, closed forest, Malaise trap, P. Feeney leg.). It is possible that in this specimen the internal projections are twisted and in ventral view showing a different surface than those in all remaining specimens. This problem requires further study, and the specimen, included here in the type series of Euconnus feeneyi feeneyi, was provided with an additional white label "aedeagus with different external lateral projections".</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/D76587E07861FFF2C693FF6BFB232CBA	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Jałoszyński, Paweł	Jałoszyński, Paweł (2015): Taxonomy of ' Euconnus complex'. Part III. Morphology of Euconnus subgenus Napochus and revision of the Australian species (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae, Scydmaeninae). Zootaxa 3925 (1): 1-24, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3925.1.1
D76587E07866FFF3C693FBB7FACA2CC7.text	D76587E07866FFF3C693FBB7FACA2CC7.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Euconnus (Napochus) feeneyi subsp. parallelilaminatus	<div><p>Euconnus (Napochus) feeneyi parallelilaminatus ssp. n.</p><p>(Figs. 33–34, 51–54, 64)</p><p>Type material studied. Holotype: AUSTRALIA (Queensland): ♂, three labels: " 11.45S 142.35E QLD / Heathlands 26Jan. –/ 29Feb.1992 P.Feehney / MALAISE #2 dump / open forest" [white, printed], "Aust. Nat. / Ins. Coll." [green, printed], " Euconnus / ( Napochus) / feeneyi parallelilaminatus m. / det. P. JAŁOSZYŃSKI, '15" [red, printed] (ANIC). Paratypes (7 ♂♂): 3 ♂♂, "11.45 142.35E QLD / Heathlands 1–21Mar. / 1992 P.Feehney / MALAISE #2 dump / open forest" [white, printed]; 1 ♂, " 11.45S 142.35E QLD / Heathlands 22Mar. –/ 25Apr.1992 T.McLeod / MALAISE #1 barracks / closed shrub(=heath)"; 1 ♂, " 11.39S 142.27E QLD / Cockatoo Ck. Xing / 17 km NW Heathlands / 22 Mar–25 Apr 1992 / T.McLeod, open forest / MALAISE #5" [white, printed] [white, printed]; 1 ♂, " 11.39S 142.27E QLD / Cockatoo Ck. Xing / 17 km NW Heathlands / 15–26 Jan.1992 / I.Naumann,T.Weir / malaise trap" [white, printed]; 1 ♂, " 12.40S 143.00E QLD / GPS 13km E by S / Weipa 16 Dec. 1993 /– 16 Jan. 1994 / P.Zborowski &amp; / D. Khalu" [white, printed] (paratypes in ANIC and cPJ).</p><p>Diagnosis. BL 1.08–1.30 mm; aedeagus in ventral view with long, narrow and nearly parallel-sided ventral apical projection with rounded apex, external lateral projections distinctly narrowing distally and with subtriangular pointed apices.</p><p>Description. This subspecies differs from Euconnus feeneyi feeneyi only in genital characters; all other structures are indistinguishable. Due to a small sample, only two distinctly different body forms were found, "short" (Fig. 33) and "long" (Fig. 34); measurements are given separately for each of them. "Short" form (N = 3): BL 1.08–1.10 mm (mean 1.08 mm); HL 0.23 mm, HW 0.24–0.25 mm (mean 0.25 mm), AnL 0.43–0.45 mm (mean 0.44 mm); PL 0.25–0.28 mm (mean 0.27 mm), PW 0.30 mm; EL 0.58–0.60 mm (mean 0.59 mm), EI 1.15–1.33. "Long" form (N = 5): BL 1.20–1.30 mm (mean 1.25 mm); HL 0.25–0.28 mm (mean 0.27 mm), HW 0.25–0.26 mm (mean 0.26 mm), AnL 0.48–0.53 mm (mean 0.51 mm); PL 0.28–0.30 mm (mean 0.29 mm), PW 0.30–0.31 mm (mean 0.31 mm); EL 0.65–0.73 mm (mean 0.70 mm), EW 0.50–0.53 mm (mean 0.52 mm), EI 1.30–1.38.</p><p>Aedeagus (Figs. 51–54) stout, AeL 0.20 mm, as in Euconnus feeneyi feeneyi, except ventral apical projection very narrow and with parallel sides and external lateral projections with narrow and pointed apices.</p><p>Female. Unknown or indistinguishable from similar species (see discussion).</p><p>Distribution. N Queensland (Fig. 64).</p><p>Etymology. The name parallelilaminatus refers to the parallel lateral margins of the aedeagal ventral apical projection.</p><p>Remarks. Holotype is one of "short" specimens; "short" and "long" specimens were labeled with a small white printed label with "short" and "long", respectively, to facilitate further study of this variability. Although the external appearance of "short" and "long" specimens is strikingly different (Fig. 33 vs. 34), the aedeagi of extremely small and extremely large specimens selected from the type series differ only in slightly more slender ventral apical projection in the former and slightly more slender dorsal apical projection in the latter (Figs. 51–52 vs. 53–54). These differences require further study, when a larger number of specimens becomes available.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/D76587E07866FFF3C693FBB7FACA2CC7	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Jałoszyński, Paweł	Jałoszyński, Paweł (2015): Taxonomy of ' Euconnus complex'. Part III. Morphology of Euconnus subgenus Napochus and revision of the Australian species (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae, Scydmaeninae). Zootaxa 3925 (1): 1-24, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3925.1.1
