identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
DF7587A2FFDCFF96FF70F873FEBB0576.text	DF7587A2FFDCFF96FF70F873FEBB0576.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Anoplius (Dicranoplius) Dufour 1834	<div><p>Anoplius (Dicranoplius), new combination</p><p>Diagnosis. Species of Anoplius (Dicranoplius) can be separated from other Neotropical Pompilinae genera by the following: the antennal segments are elongate except for A. areatus, and for males, the apical segments of the antennae are weakly crenulate in profile; the postnotum is strap-like, not expanded on each side of the midline; the legs are spinose, but the fore tibia is not spinose dorsally; the female has a weakly to strongly developed tarsal comb, but the spines are not flattened or spatulate; the female has an unusually large pulvillar pad with a fringe of short setae; the tarsal claws of both sexes are bifid with inner claw truncate; for the male, the last tarsal segment of the fore leg is slender and unmodified; the SMC3 is usually much narrower above than SMC2; the male has dense, coarse setae on the posterior face of the propodeum; and the male genitalia have greatly expanded spatulate parapenial lobes and have simple flaps rather than basal hooks.</p><p>Remarks. Species of Dicranoplius can be difficult to determine to species. As Evans (1969) noted, the genitalia should be studied for each specimen to conclusively identify the males, except for the easily recognized A. cujanus and A. areatus, especially due to the overlap of the ranges of many of the species. The aedeagus is slightly longer than the parapenial lobes and has expanded apical lobes for A. brevitarsus (Banks), A. cujanus (Holmberg), A. diphonichus (Spinola), and A. nigritus (Evans) . The aedeagus is about as long as the parapenial lobes and has a simple apex in A. areatus (Banks) and A. evansi, sp. nov. The aedeagus is much shorter than the parapenial lobes and has a simple, weakly sclerotized apex in A. pampero (Evans) and A. satanus (Holmberg) . Although the male of A. albidus (Evans) is unknown, the aedeagus will likely be longer that the parapenial lobes and have expanded lobes at the apex based on similarities of the female of this species with other species.</p><p>Coloration can also useful for reducing the number of possibilities. For A. cujanus (Holmberg), both sexes have all black integument and black setae. For A. diphonichus (Spinola), A. nigritus (Evans), and A. satanus (Holmberg), both sexes have a black head and mesosoma, a reddish orange metasoma, and the setae are black. For the females of A. albidus Evans, and both sexes of A. areatus (Banks) and A. brevitarsus (Banks), individuals have a black head and mesosoma with reddish orange metasoma, but have silver setae surrounding areas of black setae forming an obvious pattern. Lastly, both sexes of A. evansi, sp. nov. and A. pampero (Evans) have a black head and mesosoma with reddish orange metasoma, but the females lack the black and silver setae forming an obvious pattern, which is found in the males. Based on the color pattern of the female, the unknown male of A. albidus (Evans) will likely have a color pattern similar to its conspecific female, and to A. areatus (Banks) and A. brevitarsus (Banks) .</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/DF7587A2FFDCFF96FF70F873FEBB0576	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Sadler, Emily	Sadler, Emily (2017): Review of the Neotropical spider wasp subgenus Anoplius (Dicranoplius) Haupt (Hymenoptera: Pompilidae), new comb. Zootaxa 4311 (4): 537-550, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4311.4.6
DF7587A2FFDFFF96FF70FB05FDB9063D.text	DF7587A2FFDFFF96FF70FB05FDB9063D.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Anoplius (Dicranoplius) albidus (Evans 1969)	<div><p>Anoplius (Dicranoplius) albidus (Evans, 1969)</p><p>Dicranoplius albidus Evans, 1969, Studia Ent., 12: 394–395 [Holotype: ♀, Brazil: Juazeirinho, Paraiba, 19 Dec. 1955 (MCZC. Type no. 31697)].</p><p>Diagnosis. For A. albidus, the female has a black head and mesosoma with reddish orange metasoma, but has silver setae surrounding areas of black setae forming an obvious pattern on the dorsum of the head and the dorsum of the mesosoma, except the propodeum is completely covered in silver setae along with the clypeus, frons, legs, and sides and venter of the mesosoma (Fig. 1 a). Also, the female has three comb spines and the last metasomal tergum has thin setae.</p><p>Male. Unknown.</p><p>Distribution. Brazil.</p><p>Material Examined. Brazil: Espírito Santo, Colatina, 1♀, X.1969, F.M. Oliveira (EMUS) ; Mato Grosso: Ribeirão Cascalheira, Faz, Sta. Marta, Cerrado, 1♀, 14.Jul.2013, C. Vieira (EMUS) .</p><p>Remarks. The holotype was studied. This species is rare in collections and is known from three specimens, the holotype and the specimens listed above. Give the locality of the two specimens, this species must have a wide range throughout at least the Atlantic coast of Brazil. The type locality was misspelled as Joazeirinho in Evans (1966). The correct spelling is Juazeirinho.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/DF7587A2FFDFFF96FF70FB05FDB9063D	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Sadler, Emily	Sadler, Emily (2017): Review of the Neotropical spider wasp subgenus Anoplius (Dicranoplius) Haupt (Hymenoptera: Pompilidae), new comb. Zootaxa 4311 (4): 537-550, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4311.4.6
DF7587A2FFDFFF97FF70F8BBFD5F044C.text	DF7587A2FFDFFF97FF70F8BBFD5F044C.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Anoplius (Dicranoplius) areatus (Taschenberg 1869)  1869	<div><p>Anoplius (Dicranoplius) areatus (Taschenberg, 1869)</p><p>Pompilus areatus Taschenberg, 1869, Zeitschr. Gesammt. Naturwiss., 34: 66 [Type: ♀, Brazil: Lagoa Santa (Minas Gerais) (MLUH)].</p><p>Dicranoplius stangei Evans, 1969, Studia Ent., 12: 395–397 [Holotype: ♂, Argentina: 11 km Las Cejas, Tucumán, 3– 18.Dec.1966 (L. Stange) (MCZC. Type no. 31698)]. New Synonym.</p><p>Diagnosis. For A. areatus, this species can be separated from the others in the genus by coloration and the exceedingly short antennal segments. Both sexes have a black head and mesosoma with reddish orange metasoma, but have silver setae surrounding areas of black setae forming an obvious pattern on the dorsum of the head, pronotum, mesonotum and scutellum, and on the propodeum laterally (Figs. 1 b &amp; 5a,b). Additionally, the female has three comb spines that are approximately equal to the apical width of the basal tarsomere, sometimes has a smaller forth spine, and also has thin setae on the last metasomal tergum. The male has a posterior band on the pronotum, has dense white setae on the posterior face of the propodeum, and has an aedeagus that is about as long as the parapenial lobes with a simple apex (Fig. 5 in Evans (1969)).</p><p>Distribution. Argentina, Brazil and Peru.</p><p>Material Examined. Argentina: Catamarca, Palo Lobrado, 25 km S La Merced, 25♂, 24.Oct–12.Nov.2003, M.E. Irwin and F.D. Parker (EMUS) ; Chubut, 2 km SE Trelew, 9♂, 30.Dec.2005, M.E. Irwin and F.D. Parker (EMUS) . Brazil: Goias, Parque Nacional da Chapada dos Veadeiros, 70♂, 7–25.IX.2005, Aquiar (EMUS, UFES) . Peru: San Martin, 23 km S Picota, Concervación Mun. Zona Barreal, 4♂, 6–15.Mar.2005, 1♀, 14–17.Mar.2005, J.D. Vasquez (EMUS) .</p><p>Variation. Substantial color variation occurs in this species (see remarks below), as well as slight variation in genitalic morphology and tarsal comb count as documented by Evans (1969) under D. areatus and D. stangei .</p><p>Remarks. The holotype of A. areatus was not studied; specimens identified by Evans (1969) as A. areatus deposited in the MCZC were studied. The holotype (male), allotype (female), and five paratypes (male) of A. stangei were studied. Evans described A. stangei in 1969 based on the male sex and associated a female with this species. The color patterns of the holotype male and allotype female do not match, but represent two different color forms. The holotype male has extensive patches of grey setae and metasomal bands—the banded color form (Fig. 5 a). The allotype female, however, represents a second color form having less grey setae and no metasomal banding—the unbanded color form. Evans actually had both color forms, banded (Fig. 5 a) and unbanded (Fig. 5 b), of the male in his paratype series, but did not recognize this as such. Subsequently, banded males of this species were collected with females of A. areatus . This second species is only known from the female and is exact match in coloration to the holotype of A. stangei . Furthermore, it differs from the allotype of A. stangei in coloration only, and, therefore, represents the banded color form of the female. As such, we synonymize A. stangei with A. areatus, and recognize that this species has two color forms. The two color forms of the female key out separately in the key to species. The unbanded, darker color forms are more prevalent in the specimens from Argentina while the lighter, banded color forms are more prevalent in specimens from Brazil. Due the much shortened segments of the antennae, this species may be a cleptoparasite.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/DF7587A2FFDFFF97FF70F8BBFD5F044C	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Sadler, Emily	Sadler, Emily (2017): Review of the Neotropical spider wasp subgenus Anoplius (Dicranoplius) Haupt (Hymenoptera: Pompilidae), new comb. Zootaxa 4311 (4): 537-550, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4311.4.6
DF7587A2FFDEFF91FF70FA52FE880017.text	DF7587A2FFDEFF91FF70FA52FE880017.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Anoplius (Dicranoplius) brevitarsus (Banks 1947)	<div><p>Anoplius (Dicranoplius) brevitarsus (Banks, 1947)</p><p>Austrochares brevitarsus Banks, 1947, Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool. 99: 425 [Type: female, Paraguay: Rio Yguazu, March (D. Wees) (MCZC. Type no. 26666)].</p><p>Diagnosis. For A. brevitarsus, both sexes have a black head and mesosoma with reddish orange metasoma, but have silver setae surrounding areas of black setae forming an obvious pattern on the dorsum of the head, pronotum, mesonotum and scutellum, while the propodeum is mostly black except posterolaterally (Figs. 1 c,d). The female has the vertex of the head more strongly arched than in other species, has three comb spines, and the last metasomal tergum has thin setae. The male has a posterior band on the pronotum, has dense white setae on the posterior face of the propodeum, and has an aedeagus that is slightly longer than the parapenial lobes and has expanded apical lobes (Fig. 4 in Evans (1969)).</p><p>Distribution. Paraguay, Brazil and Argentina north to Trinidad.</p><p>Material Examined. Argentina: Catamarca: Andalgala, 2♂, 4.Nov.1972, G.E. Bohart (EMUS) ; Coneta, 16 km S Catamarca, 1♂, 25.Oct–12.Nov.2003, M.E. Irwin and F.D. Parker (EMUS) ; Palo Lobrado, 25 km S La Merced, 16♂, 24.Oct–12.Nov.2003, M.E. Irwin and F.D. Parker (EMUS) ; Salta: 8 km N La Viña, 3♂, 26.Oct– 13.Nov.2003, M.E. Irwin and F.D. Parker (EMUS) . Brazil: Goias, Parque Nacional da Chapada dos Veadeiros, 32♂, 3♀, 7–25.IX.2005, Aquiar (UFES) . Trinidad: Chacachacare I., 6♂, 27.Nov–4.Dec.1999, R.R. Snelling (EMUS) .</p><p>Remarks. The holotype and allotype were studied. Evans (1969) identified a specimen of A. areatus from Trinidad based on a single female and lacked any males to help with this determination. Subsequently, males of A. brevitarsus have been collected in Trinidad and study of the female indicates that it is actually A. brevitarsus rather than A. areatus .</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/DF7587A2FFDEFF91FF70FA52FE880017	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Sadler, Emily	Sadler, Emily (2017): Review of the Neotropical spider wasp subgenus Anoplius (Dicranoplius) Haupt (Hymenoptera: Pompilidae), new comb. Zootaxa 4311 (4): 537-550, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4311.4.6
DF7587A2FFD8FF91FF70FEA8FF350448.text	DF7587A2FFD8FF91FF70FEA8FF350448.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Anoplius (Dicranoplius) cujanus (Holmberg 1881)	<div><p>Anoplius (Dicranoplius) cujanus (Holmberg, 1881)</p><p>Pompilus cujanus Holmberg, 1881, Anales Soc. Cient. Argentina, 12: 274–275 [Type: ♀, Argentina: Mendoza ( Berg) (? MACN)].</p><p>Austrochares cordovensis Banks, 1947, Bull. Mus. Comp. Zool., 99: 427 [Type: ♀, Argentina: Cordoba (Davis) (MCZC. Type no. 26233)]. Synonymized by Evans (1969).</p><p>Diagnosis. For A. cujanus, both sexes can be immediately differentiated from other species of Dicranoplius by having all black integument and black setae (Figs. 1 e,f). Additionally, the female has four comb spines and the last metasomal tergum has thin setae, and the male lacks a posterior band of white integument on the pronotum, has black setae on the posterior face of the propodeum, and has an aedeagus that is slightly longer than the parapenial lobes (Fig. 1 in Evans (1969)).</p><p>Distribution. West-central Argentina.</p><p>Material Examined. Argentina: Catamarca: Adalgala, 30 km E., 2♀, 6.Dec.1971, 1♀, 24.Dec.1971, 5♂, 28.Dec.1971, D.J. Brothers (SEMC) ; Agua de las Palomas, 1♀, 19.Dec.1971, C. Porter (FSCA) ; Andagala, 1♀, 4.Oct.1972, 2♂, 4.Nov.1972, G.E. Bohart (EMUS) ; Belen, 1♂, 1.Nov.1972, G.E. Bohart (EMUS); La Puerta de San Jose, 1450 m, 2♂, 9.Dec.2003, P. Fidalgo &amp; L. Stange; Palo Labrado, 23 km S La Merced, 1♂, 24.Oct– 12.Nov.2003, M.E. Irwin &amp; F.D. Parker (EMUS) ; Mendoza, Chacras de Coria, 1♀, 12–20.Mar.1980, C. Porter (FSCA) ; Neuquén, Piedra de Aguila, 1♀, 20.Jun.1977, L. Stange (EMUS) ; La Rioja: Anillaco, 1500 m, 1♂, 6.Feb.2002, 2♂, 15.Feb.2002 (FSCA) ; ca. Campana, ruta a Famatina, 3♀, 17.Feb.2002, C. Porter &amp; P. Fidalgo (FSCA) ; Dept. Famatina, 10 km N Famatina, 51♂, 2♀, 15–20.Oct.1997, M.E. Irwin, F.D. Parker &amp; S. Roig (EMUS) ; Dept. Famatina, 12 km N Pituil, 1♂, 15–20.Oct.1997, M.E. Irwin, F.D. Parker &amp; S. Roig (EMUS) ; Illiar, 1♀, 30.Oct.1928, M. Gomex (SEMC) ; Salta: 20 km N Cafayete, 21♂, 6♀, 26.Oct–13.Nov.2003, M.E. Irwin &amp; F.D. Parker (EMUS) ; San Juan: Dept. Caucete, 13 km WSW Marayes, 1♂, 23.Oct.1997, M.E. Irwin, F.D. Parker &amp; S. Roig (EMUS) ; Santiago del Estero: Las Termas, 1♀, 11.Oct.1972, G.E. Bohart (FSCA) .</p><p>Remarks. The holotype of Pompilus cujanus Holmberg is seemingly lost. The holotype of Austrochares cordovensis Banks was studied. This species is easily diagnosed by its coloration once generic-level identification is made.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/DF7587A2FFD8FF91FF70FEA8FF350448	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Sadler, Emily	Sadler, Emily (2017): Review of the Neotropical spider wasp subgenus Anoplius (Dicranoplius) Haupt (Hymenoptera: Pompilidae), new comb. Zootaxa 4311 (4): 537-550, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4311.4.6
DF7587A2FFD8FF93FF70FA51FA8A021E.text	DF7587A2FFD8FF93FF70FA51FA8A021E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Anoplius (Dicranoplius) diphonichus (Spinola 1851)	<div><p>Anoplius (Dicranoplius) diphonichus (Spinola, 1851)</p><p>Pompilus diphonichus Spinola, 1851, in Gay, Historia de Chile, Zool., 6: 381 [Type: ♀, Chile (MRSN)].</p><p>Diagnosis. For A. diphonichus, both sexes have a black head and mesosoma, a reddish orange metasoma, and the setae are black not forming any discernible pattern, except for the clypeus and face below the antennal insertions of the male, which is covered in silver setae (Figs. 2 a). Additionally, the female has three comb spines and the last metasomal tergum has thin setae, while the aedeagus of the male is slightly longer than the parapenial lobes and has expanded apical lobes (Fig. 3 in Evans (1969)).</p><p>Distribution. Chile and Argentina.</p><p>Material Examined. Argentina: Catamarca: Belen, 6 km N, 1♀, 7.Sep.1999, M.E. Irwin &amp; F.D. Parker (EMUS) ; 4 km W Chumbicha, 1♀, 13–15.Sep.1999, M.E. Irwin and F.D. Parker (EMUS) ; 14 km N Estacion Alpasinche, 1♀, 16–19.Oct.1997, M.E. Irwin, F.D. Parker &amp; S. Roig (EMUS) ; Sierra de Ambato, 13 km NW Chumbicha, 1♀, 5.Sep.1999, M.E. Irwin and F.D. Parker (EMUS) ; Chubut, 2 km SE Trelew, 1♀, 30.Dec.2005, M.E. Irwin &amp; F.D. Parker (EMUS) ; La Rioja: Anillaco Subandean Desert, 1♀, 20.Feb.2003, C. Porter and P. Fidalgo (FSCA) ; Dept. Famatina, 10 km N Famatina, 2♂, 15–20.Oct.1997, M.E. Irwin, F.D. Parker &amp; S. Roig (EMUS) ; Nuestra, Señor de la Peña, 2 ♂ 1 ♀, 13. Feb.2004, L. Stange (FSCA) ; Sierra de Argañaraz, 25 km N Chepes, El Rocillo, 1♀, 11–16.Sep.1999, M.E. Irwin and F.D. Parker (EMUS) ; Rio Negro: Darwin, 1♂, Jan.1977, M. Fritz (EMUS) ; Salta: 9 km N Cafayete, 1 ♀, 1♂, 26.Oct–13.Nov.2003, M.E. Irwin &amp; F.D. Parker (EMUS) ; 9 km S Cafayete, 4♂, 22–26.Oct.2003, M.E. Irwin &amp; F.D. Parker (EMUS) ; 10 km S Cafayete, 2♀, 1♂, 26.Oct– 13.Nov.2003, M.E. Irwin &amp; F.D. Parker (EMUS) ; 48 km N Cafayete, 1♀, 26.Oct–13.Nov.2009, M.E. Irwin &amp; F.D. Parker (EMUS) ; San Juan: Dept. Caucete, 13 km WSW Marayes, 2♂, 23.Oct.1997, M.E. Irwin &amp; F.D. Parker (EMUS) . Chile: Elqui: Quebrada Arrayán, 10 km S La Villa, 1♀, 14–31.Oct.2003, 1♂, 21. Nov –13. Dec.2003, 1 ♂, 12.Dec–3.Jan.2004, M.E. Irwin (EMUS) ; Quebrada Arrayán, 15 km S La Villa, 4♂, 10–21.Nov.2003, 10♂, 21.Nov–13.Dec.2003, M.E. Irwin (EMUS) ; Quebrada Arrayán, 25 km S La Villa, 1♂, 12–14.Oct.2003, M.E. Irwin (EMUS) ; Quebrada Arrayán, 33 km S La Villa, 2♂, 13–21.Nov.2003, M.E. Irwin (EMUS) ; 8.5 km S Vicuna, 2♂, 15–18.Nov.1997, D. Webb, E. Schlinger &amp; M. Irwin (EMUS) ; Limari, Fray Jorge Nat. Park, 1♂, 16–31.Oct.2003, 1♂, 1–9.Oct.2003, 7♂, 7. Oct.2003, 2 ♂, 7–24.Nov.2003, 10♂, 24.Nov–12.Dec.2003, 24♂, 1♀, 12–31.Dec.2003, 1♂, 16.Nov–3.Jan.2004, 3♂, 1–8.Jan.2004, M.E. Irwin &amp; F.D. Parker (EMUS); Quillota, Quillota Parque Nac. Campanas, Palma de Ocoa, 1♂, 20.Nov–6.Dec.1997, 1♂, 6–20.Dec.1997, G. Barria &amp; M.E. Irwin (EMUS) ; Santiago: 5 km W La Rinconada de Maipu, 3♂, 20–24.Sep.1997, G. Barria &amp; M. Irwin (EMUS), La Obra, 1♀, Jan.1970, Alfard (EMUS) .</p><p>Remarks. This species is the only species of Dicranoplius to be found in Chile. Although the holotype was not studied, specimens identified by Evans (1969) deposited in the FSCA collected by C. Porter were studied. Evans (1969) states that he had little material to study (19 females, 15 males). Due to the collecting efforts of F.D. Parker and M.E. Irwin, substantially more specimens have been collected both in Chile and Argentina, and it seems that this species is more wide spread in Argentina than originally thought by Evans (1969). Evans (1966) misspelled the specific epithet in the female key as diphonicus and this misspelling now can be found in many collections.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/DF7587A2FFD8FF93FF70FA51FA8A021E	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Sadler, Emily	Sadler, Emily (2017): Review of the Neotropical spider wasp subgenus Anoplius (Dicranoplius) Haupt (Hymenoptera: Pompilidae), new comb. Zootaxa 4311 (4): 537-550, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4311.4.6
DF7587A2FFDAFF9CFF70FCA0FB59043B.text	DF7587A2FFDAFF9CFF70FCA0FB59043B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Anoplius (Dicranoplius) evansi Sadler 2017	<div><p>Anoplius (Dicranoplius) evansi Pitts and Sadler, sp. nov.</p><p>Diagnosis. In A. evansi, sp. nov., both sexes also have a black head and mesosoma with reddish orange metasoma, but the females lack the contrasting silver setae on the head and mesosoma forming an obvious pattern, which is found in the males (Figs. 3 b,c,d,e). However, the pronotum of the male only has a broad integumental band of whitish yellow and lacks black setal patches, and the propodeum has only the posterior face with whitish long setae, while the remainder is black (Fig. 3 c,e). Additionally, the female has three comb spines and the last metasomal tergum has thin setae, while the aedeagus of the male is slightly longer than the parapenial lobes and has expanded apical lobes (Fig. 5).</p><p>Description. Holotype Male. Length 11.5 mm (7.5 mm – 17 mm). Coloration (Figs. 5 c,e). Integument of head, scape, mesosoma and legs black; integument of metasoma orange. Labrum and apical 2/3 of mandible reddish brown. Flagellomeres black dorsally, orange ventrally. Pronotum with broad yellowish white integumental transverse band on posterior margin, width of approximately half of length of vertical and dorsal portion of pronotum. Silver setae on head, scape, vertical face of pronotum, prosternum, mesopleura dorsal contiguous with pronotal band, Mesopleura ventrally contiguous with mesocoxae, anterior faces of pro and mesocoxae, posterior third of mesoscutum, scutellum laterally, metanotum, propodeum anterior to spiracles and in a thin band posterior to postnotum, posterior face of propodeum, legs from tibiae to tarsi, and metasomal terga and sterna. Setae on T7 denser than elsewhere on metasoma. Remainder of mesosoma covered with short, dense, decumbent black setae. Head, propodeum and venter of metasoma with sparse, erect, orangish white, erect setae. Wings hyaline, slightly infuscated apical to closed cells and in MC. Head. Head round; TFD 1.08 × FD; MID 0.63 × FD. Ocelli in oblique triangle; lateral ocelli slightly closer to each other than to compound eyes; POL 1.12 × OOL. Mandible wide, with two sharpened apical teeth, basal tooth longer. Clypeus truncate, large, anterior margin slightly sinuous with slight broad emargination; LC 0.47 × WC; clypeal projection absent medially; dorsal surface slightly convex laterally; sculpture obscured by dense setae. Maxillary beard absent. Antenna elongate; length of third and fourth segments 2.4 × their width; ratio of the first four antennal segments 4.2:1:2.9:2.9; LA3 2.1 × UID. Mesosoma. Sculpture coriaceous where not obscured by setae. Pronotum not elongated, posterior margin angulated, pronotal collar inconspicuous. Notauli absent. Postnotum with integument covered by setae. Wing long; 1m-cu meeting 2SMC at apical third; 2SMC ~2 × length of 3SMC measured on MC; 2rs-m straight. M and cu-a in hind wing interstitial on M+CuA. Front tibia spines absent on anterior margin, few on base; mid tibia spines present, thick, sharpened, abundant; hind tibia dorsal spines present, arranged in two rows; tibial brush thinning before apex, but complete. Metasoma. Sculpture coriaceous. Venter lacking dense brushes of setae. S6 with median emargination that is Ushaped bearing lateral brown spine. Subgenital plate elongate, slightly truncate apically, bearing denser, thicker brown setae along posterior margin; with median longitudinal rounded carina that is more pronounce anteriorly and becomes indistinct posteriorly. Genitalia (Fig. 5). Paramere long, bypassing aedeagus and parapenial lobes; basal third wider and laterally flattened; apical two-thirds finger-like and dorsoventrally flattened towards apex; setae long, thin, sparse found throughout apical two-thirds; ventral squama absent. Parapenial lobe split; lobe broad and thickened, becoming spatulate apically. Digitus wide, truncate, punctate; length 0.6× paramere length; apex dorsally curved. Basal hooklets absent. Aedeagus long, slender, slightly longer than parapenial lobe, apex flaring laterally.</p><p>Allotype Female. Length 14.2 mm (12.3–14.2 mm). Coloration (Figs. 3 b,d). Head, mesosoma, and legs from coxae to femora black; remainder of legs dark brown tinged with rufous; scape and pedicel dark brown; flagellomeres lighter brown, tinged with rufous; mandible with apical half rufous, basal half dark brown; metasoma orange, except extreme apex of T1 black; wing brown. Head, mesosoma, and legs covered in dense decumbent brown setae discernible from integument only at high magnification. Head and dorsum of femora with sparse erect brown setae. Metasoma covered in short, decumbent, silver setae only visible at certain angles, except T6 more densely and distinctly covered in short, dense, silver setae. T6 also with sparse, longer, erect, brown setae. Head. Head wide; TFD 1.15 × FD; MID 0.68 × FD. Ocelli in oblique triangle; lateral ocelli closer to each other than to compound eyes; POL 0.90 × OOL. Mandible wide, with two sharpened apical teeth, basal tooth longer. Clypeus with anterior slight broad emargination; LC 0.35 × WC; clypeal lacking projection medially; dorsal surface slightly convex laterally; anterior margin nitid. Maxillary beard absent. Antenna elongate; length of fourth segment 3.4 × its width; ratio of the first four antennal segments 2.8:1:6:3.4; WA3 0.20× LA3; LA3 0.91 × UID. Mesosoma. Pronotum not elongated, posterior margin angulated; pronotal collar inconspicuous. Notauli absent. Postnotum thin band not obscured by setae. Propodeum with sloping dorsal face and distinct vertical face. Wing long; 1m-cu meeting 2SMC at apical third; 2SMC 2 × length of 3SMC measured on MC; 2rs-m straight. M and cu-a in hind wing interstitial on M+CuA. Front tibia with 3 comb-spines; spines absent on anterior margin; mid tibia spines present, thick, sharpened, abundant; hind tibia with two rows of dorsal spines; tibial brush thick, complete. Metasoma. Metasoma coriaceous.</p><p>Distribution. Colombia.</p><p>Type material. Holotype, ♂, Colombia, Magdalena Parques Nacionales Naturales Tayrona, Bahia Neguanje, 20.IV–4.V.2001, R. Henriquez (IAvH) . Allotype, female, same collection data as male (IAvH). Paratypes (44 ♂, 2 ♀): Colombia: Bolizar Santuario de Fauna y Flora, Los Colorado Alto el Mirador, 2♂, 6–24.X.2001, E. Deulufeut (IAvH); Magdalena Parques Nacionales Naturales Tayrona, Bahia Neguanje, 7♂, 20.IV–4. V.2001, 9 ♂, 2♀, 4–23.V.2001, 3♂, 14–28.VII.2001, 11♂, 28.VII–18.VIII.2001, 12♂, 17–27.IX.2001, R. Henriquez (EMUS, IAvH).</p><p>Etymology. This species is named after Howard E. Evans, who first revised this group.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/DF7587A2FFDAFF9CFF70FCA0FB59043B	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Sadler, Emily	Sadler, Emily (2017): Review of the Neotropical spider wasp subgenus Anoplius (Dicranoplius) Haupt (Hymenoptera: Pompilidae), new comb. Zootaxa 4311 (4): 537-550, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4311.4.6
DF7587A2FFD5FF9DFF70FA43FAC00083.text	DF7587A2FFD5FF9DFF70FA43FAC00083.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Anoplius (Dicranoplius) nigritus (Evans 1969)	<div><p>Anoplius (Dicranoplius) nigritus (Evans, 1969)</p><p>Dicranoplius nigritus Evans, 1969, Studia Ent., 12: 389–390 [Holotype: ♂, Brazil: Arroio Arapua, 1120 meters, Rio Grande do Sul, Dec. 1964 (F. Plaumann) (MCZC. Type no. 31696)].</p><p>Diagnosis. For A. nigritus, both sexes have a black head and mesosoma, a reddish orange metasoma, and the setae are black (Figs. 2 b,c). The clypeus and frons is covered in sparse silver setae in the female, while the male only has silver setae present lateral to the antennal insertions; the clypeus of the male has black setae. Additionally, the female has three comb spines and the last metasomal tergum has stout spines, while the aedeagus of the male is slightly longer than the parapenial lobes and has expanded apical lobes (Fig. 2 in Evans (1969)).</p><p>Distribution. West-central Argentina to Brazil.</p><p>Material Examined. Argentina: Catamarca: Adalgala, 30 km E., 4♂, 28.Dec.1971, D.J. Brothers (SEMC) ; Belen, 2 km N, Quebrada Belen Dam, 1♂, 17–19.Oct.1997, M.E. Irwin, F.D. Parker and S. Roig (EMUS); Palo Labrado, 23 km S La Merced, 4♂, 24.Oct–12.Nov.2003, M.E. Irwin and F.D. Parker (EMUS) ; Sierra de Ambato, Hwy 60 18 km NW Chumbicha, 2♂, 6–9.Sep.1999, M.E. Irwin and F.D. Parker (EMUS) ; La Rioja: Dept. Famatina, 10 km N Famatina, 12♂, 15–20.Oct.1997, M.E. Irwin, F.D. Parker and S. Roig (EMUS) ; Dept. Rosaro V. Penaloza, Sierra de Arganaraz El Rocillo, 1♂, 11–22.Oct.1997, 1♂, 22.Oct.1997, M.E. Irwin, F.D. Parker and S.</p><p>Roig (EMUS); Santa Cruz, 1♂, 1.Dec.2002, L. Stange (FSCA); Santa Vera Cruz, 1♀, 15–31.Dec.2003, P. Fidalgo (FSCA); Nuestra, Señor de la Peña, 1♂, 13.Feb.2004, L. Stange (FSCA) ; Rta 40 ca Campanas, 1♀, 27.Feb.2003, C. Porter and P. Fidalgo (FSCA) . Salta Prov., 4 km S Cafayete, 2♂, 29–30.Sep.2009, M.E. Irwin (EMUS) ; 8 km S Cafayete, 1♂, 27.Sep–1.Nov.2009, M.E. Irwin (EMUS) ; 9 km S Cafayete, 2♂, 22–26.Oct.2003, M.E. Irwin and F.D. Parker (EMUS) ; 8 km N La Viña, 2♂, 26.Oct–13.Dec.2003, M.E. Irwin and F.D. Parker (EMUS) .</p><p>Remarks. The holotype (male) and allotype (female) were studied. The original type material was from southern Brazil. The additional material studied here extends the range of the species into Argentina.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/DF7587A2FFD5FF9DFF70FA43FAC00083	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Sadler, Emily	Sadler, Emily (2017): Review of the Neotropical spider wasp subgenus Anoplius (Dicranoplius) Haupt (Hymenoptera: Pompilidae), new comb. Zootaxa 4311 (4): 537-550, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4311.4.6
DF7587A2FFD4FF9DFF70F992FB3D06C6.text	DF7587A2FFD4FF9DFF70F992FB3D06C6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Anoplius (Dicranoplius) pampero (Evans 1969)	<div><p>Anoplius (Dicranoplius) pampero (Evans, 1969)</p><p>Dicranoplius pampero Evans, 1969, Studia Ent., 12: 398–399 [Holotype: ♂, Argentina: Conesa, Rio Negro, Jan. 1954 (MSUC)].</p><p>Diagnosis. In A. pampero, both sexes also have a black head and mesosoma with reddish orange metasoma, but the females lack the black and silver setae forming an obvious pattern, which is found in the males (Figs. 2 d,e). The female has three comb spines and the last metasomal tergum has thin setae. The aedeagus is much shorter than the parapenial lobes and has a simple, weakly sclerotized, apex in A. pampero (Fig. 12 in Evans (1969)).</p><p>Distribution. Argentina.</p><p>Remarks. The holotype and allotype were studied. No new material of this species was studied.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/DF7587A2FFD4FF9DFF70F992FB3D06C6	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Sadler, Emily	Sadler, Emily (2017): Review of the Neotropical spider wasp subgenus Anoplius (Dicranoplius) Haupt (Hymenoptera: Pompilidae), new comb. Zootaxa 4311 (4): 537-550, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4311.4.6
DF7587A2FFD7FF9FFF70FA70FDE00257.text	DF7587A2FFD7FF9FFF70FA70FDE00257.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Anoplius (Dicranoplius) satanus (Holmberg 1881)	<div><p>Anoplius (Dicranoplius) satanus (Holmberg, 1881)</p><p>Pompilus satanus Holmberg, 1881, Anales Soc. Cient. Argentina, 12: 143 [Type: ♂, Argentina (? MACN)].</p><p>Diagnosis. For A. satanus, both sexes have a black head and mesosoma, a reddish orange metasoma, and the setae are black (Figs. 2 f &amp; 3a). Both sexes have the antenna indistinctly to distinctly rufous, and the male has silver setae on the face that becomes brownish gold on the dorsum of the head and on the pronotum (Figs. 2 f &amp; 3a). Additionally, the female has three comb spines and the last metasomal tergum has thin setae, while in the males the aedeagus is much shorter than the parapenial lobes and has a simple, weakly sclerotized, apex (Fig. 11 in Evans (1969)).</p><p>Distribution. Argentina.</p><p>Material Examined. Argentina: Catamarca: Adalgala, 30 km E., 1♂ 1♀, 28.Dec.1971, D.J. Brothers (SEMC) ; ca. Agua de las Palomas, 1♀, 19.Dec.1971, C. Porter (FSCA) ; Andalgala, 6♂, 25.Oct.1972, G.E. Bohart (EMUS) ; 2 km N Belen, Quebrada Belen Dam, 4♀, 17–19.Oct.1997, M.E. Irwin, F.D. Parker and S. Roig (EMUS) ; Cloneta, 16 km S Catamarca, 1♂, 25.Oct–12.Nov.2003, M.E. Irwin and F.D. Parker (EMUS) ; Palo Labrado, 11 km S La Merced, 2♂, 23–25.Oct.2003, M.E. Irwin and F.D. Parker (EMUS) ; Palo Labrado, 23 km S La Merced, 9♂, 24.Oct–21.Nov.2003, M.E. Irwin and F.D. Parker (EMUS) ; Palo Labrado, 25 km S La Merced, 10♂, 1♀, 24.Oct– 12.Nov.2003, M.E. Irwin and F.D. Parker (EMUS) ; Sierra de Ambato, Hwy 60, 18 km NW Chumbicha, 1♂ 5♀, 6– 9.Sep.1999, M.E. Irwin and F.D. Parker (EMUS) ; Cordoba, 47.5 km N Dean Funes, 2♂, 4–10.Sep.1999, M.E. Irwin and F.D. Parker (EMUS) ; Jujuy: 27 km N Jujuy, 1♂, 27. Oct –14. Nov ..2003, M.E. Irwin and F.D. Parker (EMUS) ; La Rioja: Anillaco Subandean Desert, 1♂, 20.Feb.2003, C. Porter and P. Fidalgo (FSCA) ; Dept. Famatina, 10 km N Famatina, 1♀, 15–20.Oct.1997, M.E. Irwin, F.D. Parker, and S. Roig (EMUS) ; ca. Campana, ruta a Famatina, 1♂, 17.Feb.2002, C. Porter &amp; P. Fidalgo (FSCA) ; Dept. Rosaro, Penaloza, Sierra de Arganaraz, El Rocillo, 3♀, 22.Oct.1997, M.E. Irwin, F.D. Parker, and S. Roig (EMUS) ; Nuestra, Señor de la Peña, 1♂, 13.Feb.2004, L. Stange (FSCA) ; Santa Cruz, 1♀, 1.Dec.2002, L. Stange (FSCA); Santa Vera Cruz, 1♀, 21.Nov.2002, L. Stange (FSCA); Mendoza, Chacras de Coria, 3♀, 1♂, 12–20.Mar.1980, 1♀ 1♂, 12–20.Mar.1980, C. Porter (FSCA) ; Río Negro: Conesa, 2♀, Jan.1954, F.H. Walz (EMUS) ; Luis Beltran, 1♂, 1♀, Jan.1977, M. Fritz (EMUS) ; Las Perlas, 1♂, Jan.2007, C. Porter (FSCA) ; Salta: 8 km N La Viña, 5♂, 26.Oct–13.Nov.2003, M.E. Irwin and F.D. Parker (EMUS) ; 10 km S Cafayete, 3♂, 26.Oct–13-Nov.2003, M.E. Irwin and F.D. Parker (EMUS) ; Santa Fe: Tostado, F.C.C.N. El Order, 3♂, A.J. Giai (SEMC) ; Tucaman: El Solidad, 11 km W Las Cejas, 1♂, 27.Mar.1967, L. Stange (EMUS) ; Quebrada Las Canas, nr Ruinas de Quilmes, 1♀, 18.Oct.1997, M.E. Irwin, F.D. Parker, and S. Roig (EMUS) . Bolivia: Santa Cruz, Campo Guairuy, 24 km S. Camiri, 3000’, 1♂, 4.Mar.1999, L. Stange (FSCA) .</p><p>Remarks. We were unable to locate the holotype. EMUS has specimens determined by Evans and also by M. Fritz that match the original description. These specimens were studied as well as specimens identified by Banks and Evans deposited at the MCZC.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/DF7587A2FFD7FF9FFF70FA70FDE00257	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Sadler, Emily	Sadler, Emily (2017): Review of the Neotropical spider wasp subgenus Anoplius (Dicranoplius) Haupt (Hymenoptera: Pompilidae), new comb. Zootaxa 4311 (4): 537-550, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4311.4.6
DF7587A2FFD6FF98FF70FC77FA5B0034.text	DF7587A2FFD6FF98FF70FC77FA5B0034.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Anoplius Dufour 1834	<div><p>Key to the New World Subgenera of Anoplius</p><p>(modified from Evans 1966)</p><p>Females</p><p>1. Front tarsis without a comb, the second segment with or without some minute spines on the outer side and with the usual apical ones................................................................................................2</p><p>-. Front tarsis with a comb of short to fairly long spines, the second segment with a spine on the outer side near the middle which is as long as the apex of this segment......................................................................3</p><p>2. Claws dentate (except in A. ithaca, in this species the inner claws of each pair longer than the outer claws, in any case the inner ray acute); three SMCs present.............................................................. Anoplius Dufour</p><p>-. Claws bifid, the inner ray truncate, inner and outer claws of each pair the same size; two SMCs present Cameronoplius Evans</p><p>3. Claws bifid, the inner ray truncate, inner and outer claws of each pair the same size.................. Dicranoplius Haupt</p><p>-. Claws dentate........................................................................................4</p><p>4. Anterior margin of clypeus with a distinct median emargination; posterior margin of pronotum arcuate; head and mesosoma with abundant erect hairs......................................................... Lophopompilus Radoskowski</p><p>-. Anterior margin of clypeus without emargination, or, if so, either the posterior margin of pronotum angulate or the propodeum only weakly setose or setae absent........................................................................5</p><p>5. Marginal cell long, removed from wing tip by not more than its own length, the Rs rather evenly arched; SMC3 wider on Rs than second; spines of tarsal comb very short.................................................. Anopliodes Banks</p><p>-. Marginal cell of variable length, Rs always somewhat angled at 3rs-m vein; SMC3 narrower on the Rs than the second.....5</p><p>6. Apical margin of clypeus with a median emargination; front narrow, MID no over 0.56× TFD.......... Notiochares Banks</p><p>-. Apical margin of clypeus truncate, or, if emargination, the front broader than above........... Arachnophroctonus Howard</p><p>Males</p><p>1. SGP with a large plumose process at its base which projects from the emargination of the preceding sternite............................................................................................ Lophopompilus Radoskowski</p><p>-. SGP without a basal plumose process...................................................................... 2</p><p>2. S4 with a semicircular area of felt-like pubescence along its posterior margin; SGP with a V-Shaped emargination................................................................................................ Notiochares Banks</p><p>-. S4 without such an area of felt-like pubescence; SGP not as above...............................................3</p><p>3. Last segment of tarsus unmodified, the sides nearly parallel, not at all produced laterally.............................4</p><p>-. Last segment of tarsus modified, the inner side weakly to strongly produced laterally................................5</p><p>4. SMC3 wide above, wider than the second; parapenial lobes not spatulate apically; posterior face of propodeum sometimes with dense short setae........................................................................ Anopliodes Banks</p><p>-. SMC3 narrower above than the second; parapenial lobes spatulate apically; posterior face of propodeum with dense elongate flattened setae......................................................................... Dicranoplius Haupt</p><p>5. Propodeum in profile sloping evenly from front to rear; venter often with dense brush of setae............ Anoplius Dufour</p><p>-. Propodeum in profile sloping weakly in front and much more abruptly declivous on the posterior fourth; venter with dense brush of setae in few species.............................................................................6</p><p>6. Two SMCs present, 2SMC receiving both 1m-cu and 2m-cu; fore wing with the transverse M+CuA and cu-a interstitial........................................................................................ Cameronoplius Evans</p><p>-. Three SMCs present............................................................. Arachnophroctonus Howard</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/DF7587A2FFD6FF98FF70FC77FA5B0034	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Sadler, Emily	Sadler, Emily (2017): Review of the Neotropical spider wasp subgenus Anoplius (Dicranoplius) Haupt (Hymenoptera: Pompilidae), new comb. Zootaxa 4311 (4): 537-550, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4311.4.6
