taxonID	type	description	language	source
DE0587BEFFC0FFF98FE3FD3CFE61EB85.taxon	discussion	Remark. The paralectotype is damaged and the head was badly glued to pronotum thus partially obscuring important features (Figs 1, 3).	en	Strumia, Franco (2016): Review of the genus Haba Semenov, 1954 (Hymenoptera Chrysididae) with the key to species. Zootaxa 4161 (2): 289-294, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4161.2.11
DE0587BEFFC3FFFA8FE3FF00FF76ED57.taxon	materials_examined	Holotype of Holopyga biroi Mocsáry, ♀, white label with red border: Holotypus / Holopyga female / biroi / (L. D. French) Mocsáry // white label: " biroi mocs. / typ. / det. Mocsáry " // white label: " Hedychridium n. sp. " (hanwritted by Mocsáry) // white label: " 1903 / III 22 II " // blue label: " Hungarian Natural History Museum / Hymen. Coll. / Budapest " // blue label: " id. nr 135044 / HNHM / HYM. COLL. " // white label with red border: Haba biroi / (F. Strumia).	en	Strumia, Franco (2016): Review of the genus Haba Semenov, 1954 (Hymenoptera Chrysididae) with the key to species. Zootaxa 4161 (2): 289-294, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4161.2.11
DE0587BEFFC3FFFA8FE3FF00FF76ED57.taxon	discussion	Remark. The type, is in good status, was captured in Gafsa (Tunisia) by L. Birò and pinned partly rolled up (Fig. 5).	en	Strumia, Franco (2016): Review of the genus Haba Semenov, 1954 (Hymenoptera Chrysididae) with the key to species. Zootaxa 4161 (2): 289-294, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4161.2.11
DE0587BEFFC3FFFA8FE3FA6DFA83E86D.taxon	materials_examined	Holotype of Holopyga subtilis Mocsáry, ♂, white label: " Taschkend / 19. IV. 09 " // white label: " subtilis / typ. Mocs. / det. Mocsáry " // white label with red border: " Holotypus male / Holopyga / subtilis / (L. D. French) Mocsáry " // blue label: " id nr 135045 / HNHM / Hym. coll. " // blue label: " Hungarian Natural History Museum / Hymenoptera Collec. / Budapest " // white label with red border: Haba subtilis / (F. Strumia).	en	Strumia, Franco (2016): Review of the genus Haba Semenov, 1954 (Hymenoptera Chrysididae) with the key to species. Zootaxa 4161 (2): 289-294, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4161.2.11
DE0587BEFFC3FFFA8FE3FA6DFA83E86D.taxon	discussion	Remark. The type was badly pinned in the mesonotum and the scutellum is not visible (Fig. 13).	en	Strumia, Franco (2016): Review of the genus Haba Semenov, 1954 (Hymenoptera Chrysididae) with the key to species. Zootaxa 4161 (2): 289-294, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4161.2.11
DE0587BEFFC2FFFB8FE3FB54FD49E8E6.taxon	materials_examined	Holotype of Holopyga (Hedychridium) colonialis Mocsáry, ♂, white label with red border: " Holotypus / Holoyga colonialis male / (L. D. French) Mocsáry " // white label: " colonialis Mocs. / typ. / det. Mocsáry " // blue label: " id nr 135039 / HNHM / Hym. coll. " // blue: label " Hungarian Natural History Museum / Hymenoptera Collec. / Budapest " // white label: " Eritrea / Keren " // white label with red border: Haba colonialis / (F. Strumia). Additional material. UAE: Wadi Bih Dam, 22 – 26. III. 2009, A. van Harten legit, 1 ♂ [FSC]. Saudi Arabia: Asir Region, Abha Farm Centre, Hay Alnusub Farm, 18 º 13 ’ N 42 º 30 ’ E, 2220 m, 27. VIII. 2013, Hassan Dawah legit, 1 ♂ [FSC].	en	Strumia, Franco (2016): Review of the genus Haba Semenov, 1954 (Hymenoptera Chrysididae) with the key to species. Zootaxa 4161 (2): 289-294, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4161.2.11
DE0587BEFFC2FFFB8FE3FB54FD49E8E6.taxon	discussion	Remark. Haba colonialis, although uncommon, appears widespread in the Arabian Peninsula. The original Mocsáry descriptions are correct and accurate. Unfortunately an identification key was never presented for Haba genus, making difficult the assignment of new material within genus. In addition the wrong Linsenmaier placement in the genus Holopyga produced taxonomic confusion. In a recent paper (Strumia 2014), I tentatively reported Haba biroi from UAE and Iran on the basis of Linsenmaier (1999: 42) interpretation. When confrontation with the paralectotype become possible, this material resulted to be a male of Haba colonialis, and a male and female of a possible new species to be described. From the study of the original material a new key for a correct identification of all known Haba species is presented and illustrated by pertinent photos (Figs 1 – 17). All listed species show the body features listed by Kimsey and Bohart 1991: 176, in particular the hind tarsus bifid claw (Fig. 17) as in Fig. 58 of Kimsey and Bohart.	en	Strumia, Franco (2016): Review of the genus Haba Semenov, 1954 (Hymenoptera Chrysididae) with the key to species. Zootaxa 4161 (2): 289-294, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4161.2.11
