taxonID	type	description	language	source
C92C8B2F417A7903933C4FCA5CCC0A15.taxon	synonymic_list	Lithobius (Archilithobius) excellens Silvestri, 1894: 580. Lithobius (Lithobius) occultus Silvestri, 1894: 579.	en	C. A. W. Jeekel (1967): On two Italian Lithobius species described by Silvestri, with taxonomic notes on the genus Eupolybothrus Verhoeff (Chilopoda, Lithobiida). BEAUFORTIA SERIES OF MISCELLANEOUS PUBLICATIONS 14, No. 175: 165-175, URL: http://un.availab.le
C92C8B2F417A7903933C4FCA5CCC0A15.taxon	diagnosis	Type material. The type material of excellens consists of a single female specimen labelled La Spezia, Caverna del Ginepro, 1869, Abdul Kerim. As there is no evidence in Silvestri s description that he had more than one specimen, I have labelled it as holotype. The material of occultus was labelled Grotta del Gazzo, 19. IX. 1888, Barberi and consisted also of a single female specimen. Apparently, Silvestri also had but one specimen of this species, and, consequently, I have labelled it also as holotype.	en	C. A. W. Jeekel (1967): On two Italian Lithobius species described by Silvestri, with taxonomic notes on the genus Eupolybothrus Verhoeff (Chilopoda, Lithobiida). BEAUFORTIA SERIES OF MISCELLANEOUS PUBLICATIONS 14, No. 175: 165-175, URL: http://un.availab.le
C92C8B2F417A7903933C4FCA5CCC0A15.taxon	description	Descriptive notes. The specimen of occultus is apparently not fully mature: the medial spur of the gonopods is distinctly smaller than the lateral one. This condition accounts for most of the differences between the two type specimens. The following notes made after the type of both species may supplement Silvestri s descriptions. Colour of both specimens much as in Lithobius forficatus: light castaneous. Head as long as wide. Antennae about four fifths of the body length (excellens) or about two thirds of the body length (occultus), composed of 76 (exc., right antenna mutilated) and 73 (occ., right) and 61 (occ., left) antennomeres. 2 nd antennomere two and a half times as long as the 3 rd. Ocelli small. Forcipular coxosternite without particulars. Tergites slightly uneven, in the second half of the body with dispersed short setae. Posterior angles of T. 6 obtuse, of T. 7 about rectangular. T. 9, T. 11 and T. 13 with acutely angular projections (fig. 1). Sternites dispersedly impresso-punctate. Legs of the 14 th and 15 th pairs from the femur onwards with dense pore sieves on the medial (posterior) side only. Relative length of the pedomeres of the 15 th leg (length of head = 100): P. 105 (exc.), 100 (occ.); F. 118 (exc.), 126 (0 cc.); Ti. 145 (exc.), 156 (occ.); Ta. 1 141 (exc.), 148 (occ.); Ta. 2 105 (exc.), 100 (occ.). Spinulation of legs, see table. Spines very long, the VPm spine of the first leg almost as long as the greatest length of the prefemur. Female gonopods without particulars.	en	C. A. W. Jeekel (1967): On two Italian Lithobius species described by Silvestri, with taxonomic notes on the genus Eupolybothrus Verhoeff (Chilopoda, Lithobiida). BEAUFORTIA SERIES OF MISCELLANEOUS PUBLICATIONS 14, No. 175: 165-175, URL: http://un.availab.le
501F784F170EAE389909C5CD8457EE7A.taxon	diagnosis	Besides the type-species, E. nodulosus (Verhoeff, 1905), this subgenus has only E. werneri (Attems, 1902). The two species are known by their type specimens only, which came from Thessalia (Greece) and Magnesia (= Manisa, Turkey?), respectively. The differences between the two seem rather unimportant and, in fact, may relate to different post-larval stages of the same species.	en	C. A. W. Jeekel (1967): On two Italian Lithobius species described by Silvestri, with taxonomic notes on the genus Eupolybothrus Verhoeff (Chilopoda, Lithobiida). BEAUFORTIA SERIES OF MISCELLANEOUS PUBLICATIONS 14, No. 175: 165-175, URL: http://un.availab.le
501F784F170EAE389909C5CD8457EE7A.taxon	description	The subgenus is characterized by the absence of triangular projections on the tergites, and the presence in the 15 th leg of a VCm and a VCa spine. The 15 th leg has a single claw, and in the male its prefemu; is dorsally sulcate. The male gnnopods are short.	en	C. A. W. Jeekel (1967): On two Italian Lithobius species described by Silvestri, with taxonomic notes on the genus Eupolybothrus Verhoeff (Chilopoda, Lithobiida). BEAUFORTIA SERIES OF MISCELLANEOUS PUBLICATIONS 14, No. 175: 165-175, URL: http://un.availab.le
981F8DB7952D83338DFD7245D3D88E80.taxon	diagnosis	This subgenus was monotypically based on E. caesar (Verhoeff, 1899), to which later E. tabularum (Verhoeff, 1937) was added. In the present concept Schizopolybothrus comprises over a dozen of forms occurring in North Italy, Jugoslavia, Albania, and Greece. Apparently the species of this subgenus are rare, and most of the described forms are known only from the original material.	en	C. A. W. Jeekel (1967): On two Italian Lithobius species described by Silvestri, with taxonomic notes on the genus Eupolybothrus Verhoeff (Chilopoda, Lithobiida). BEAUFORTIA SERIES OF MISCELLANEOUS PUBLICATIONS 14, No. 175: 165-175, URL: http://un.availab.le
981F8DB7952D83338DFD7245D3D88E80.taxon	description	The characters of the subgenus are the presence of triangular projections on the 9 th, 11 th and 13 th tergites, and a VCm spine on the 15 th leg. The 15 th leg has one to four VCa spines, and a single claw. 14 th leg with one to three VCa spines. According to the structure of the last two pairs of legs of the male and the male gonopods, the species can be divided into three categories. I. The 15 th leg with a large rounded knob proximad of the middle of the caudal side of the prefemur. The prefemur of the 14 th leg often has a triangular process distally on the dorso-caudal side. Gonopods short. To this group belong E. caesar (Verhoeff, 1899), E. caesar ssp. valonensis (Verhoeff, 1905), E. caesar ssp. patens (Attems, 1935), E. spiniger (Latzel, 1888), E. acherontis (Verhoeff, 1900) (probably, although only the female has been described), E. acherontis ssp. wardaranus (Verhoeff, 1937), E. stygis (Folkmanova, 1940), and E. leostygis (Verhoeff, 1899). Its known distribution includes Jugoslavia (Bosnia, Hercegovina, Dalmatia, Macedonia), Albania, and Greece (Corfu, Epirus). E. stygis and E. leostygis were originally described from caves. II. The 14 th and 15 th legs without special modifications. Gonopods short. Here belong E. tabularum (Verhoeff, 1937), and probably also E. excellens (Silvestri, 1894), although the male characters of the latter are unknown. The two species were described from northwestern Italy (Prov. Cuneo, Prov. Genova), E. excellens from caves. III. Prefemur of the 15 th leg with a deep dorsal furrow. Gonopods long.	en	C. A. W. Jeekel (1967): On two Italian Lithobius species described by Silvestri, with taxonomic notes on the genus Eupolybothrus Verhoeff (Chilopoda, Lithobiida). BEAUFORTIA SERIES OF MISCELLANEOUS PUBLICATIONS 14, No. 175: 165-175, URL: http://un.availab.le
981F8DB7952D83338DFD7245D3D88E80.taxon	diagnosis	The two known species, E. zeus (Verhoeff, 1901) and E. sissii (Kanellis, 1959), were described from Central Greece and Euboea, respectively.	en	C. A. W. Jeekel (1967): On two Italian Lithobius species described by Silvestri, with taxonomic notes on the genus Eupolybothrus Verhoeff (Chilopoda, Lithobiida). BEAUFORTIA SERIES OF MISCELLANEOUS PUBLICATIONS 14, No. 175: 165-175, URL: http://un.availab.le
981F8DB7952D83338DFD7245D3D88E80.taxon	discussion	The characters by which the species and subspecies within these three categories are separated concern mainly differences in the numbers of ocelli, antennomeres and coxosternal teeth, and the spinulation of the legs. Their significance in many cases seems dubious, and it is very likely that the groups II and III actually concern only one species each. One may even wonder if not the so-called species and subspecies of group I are just elements of one single polytypic species. Probably the cave-dwelling specimens, with their more elevated number of antennomeres and sometimes reduced number of ocelli, do not represent one or more different troglobiont species, but are merely the cave forms of one troglophilous species. Given the usual instability of the mentioned characters in Eupolybothrus, the influence of cave life oh the ontogenetic development might well result here in a considerable amount of variability. Considering the above, it is clear that the following key to the species of Schizopolybothrus can be regarded only as a guide to the published descriptions and not as an identification key in the usual sense.	en	C. A. W. Jeekel (1967): On two Italian Lithobius species described by Silvestri, with taxonomic notes on the genus Eupolybothrus Verhoeff (Chilopoda, Lithobiida). BEAUFORTIA SERIES OF MISCELLANEOUS PUBLICATIONS 14, No. 175: 165-175, URL: http://un.availab.le
981F8DB7952D83338DFD7245D3D88E80.taxon	discussion	In connection with the species of Schizopolybothrus the following remarks must be made. Verhoeff (1943) referred leostygis to his subgenus Mesobothrus, thus plying that the species has long gonopods. As this is contradictory to his own and to Attems's (1935) descriptions, and as leostygis through other characters shows strong affinities to acherontis and caesar, we may safely assume that this was an error. Verhoeff (1943) distinguished a subspecies stygisleo of E. leostygis which was characterized by having 2 ocelli (instead of 4 to 5) and by having the ten distal antennomeres 1 1 / 3 to 1 1 / 2 times longer than broad and the last antennomere 1 3 / 4 times longer than broad. Considering the instability of this kind of characters in the Lithobiidae this subspecies is better withdrawn. The characters in the above key were derived from the descriptions and notes on leostygis and stygisleo by Verhoeff (1899, 1900, 1943) and Attems (1935). According to Attems the species has up to 10 ocelli. The record of leostygis by Attems (1908) was based on a misidentification and refers to E. obrovensis (Verhoeff, 1930). It is not clear why Attems (1935) referred his subspecies patens to leostygis. In view of the high number of ocelli and the considerably lower number of antennomeres, this form has comparatively little to do with leostygis and is better associated with caesar. E. excellens seems very closely related to tabularum, but unfortunately the discovery of the male has to be awaited before a more definite statement can be made. Moreover, tabularum is characterized by a dense brush of setae covering partly the coxosternal teeth. This brush is lacking completely in excellens.	en	C. A. W. Jeekel (1967): On two Italian Lithobius species described by Silvestri, with taxonomic notes on the genus Eupolybothrus Verhoeff (Chilopoda, Lithobiida). BEAUFORTIA SERIES OF MISCELLANEOUS PUBLICATIONS 14, No. 175: 165-175, URL: http://un.availab.le
79CC650105FBE28D7BE88F4112035B2D.taxon	diagnosis	The type-species, Lithobius grossipes C. L. Koch, 1847, is generally considered to be a junior synonym of E. fasciatus (Newport, 1845). Around this species the majority of described species, subspecies and varieties of the genus can be arranged, so that Eupolybothrus s. str. is numerically the largest of the recognized subgenera. Geographically it has also the largest range, extending from southeastern France, Switzerland and southeastern Germany, throughout Italy and the Balkans, to Turkey and Syria, and the species are likely to be the dominant forms of the genus in collections from this area. Relatively few species have been described from caves.	en	C. A. W. Jeekel (1967): On two Italian Lithobius species described by Silvestri, with taxonomic notes on the genus Eupolybothrus Verhoeff (Chilopoda, Lithobiida). BEAUFORTIA SERIES OF MISCELLANEOUS PUBLICATIONS 14, No. 175: 165-175, URL: http://un.availab.le
79CC650105FBE28D7BE88F4112035B2D.taxon	description	The subgenus is characterized by the absence of a VCm spine on the 15 th leg, which has a double claw. VCa spines almost always absent. Triangular projections present on the 6 th, 7 th, 9 th, 11 th and 13 th tergites, rarely reduced or absent on the 6 th and 7 th. Male gonopods long.	en	C. A. W. Jeekel (1967): On two Italian Lithobius species described by Silvestri, with taxonomic notes on the genus Eupolybothrus Verhoeff (Chilopoda, Lithobiida). BEAUFORTIA SERIES OF MISCELLANEOUS PUBLICATIONS 14, No. 175: 165-175, URL: http://un.availab.le
79CC650105FBE28D7BE88F4112035B2D.taxon	discussion	For a long time E. fasciatus has been considered to have a range largely agreeing with the area of the subgenus. But, as Verhoeff (1941) has pointed out, most of the earlier fasciatus records are probably referable to forms of the group of E. apenninigenus (Broelemann, 1894). It seems likely that E. fasciatus is restricted to northern Italy and northern Jugoslavia and adjacent Central Europe. According to Verhoeff the only other form belonging to the fasciatus group is E. baldensis (Verhoeff, 1937). In one group with E. apenninigenus belong E. apenninigenus ssp. presbanus (Verhoeff, 1941), E. a. ssp. planinarum (Verhoeff, 1943), E. a. ssp. cribellatus (Verhoeff, 1944), E. a. ssp. coxodentatus (Verhoeff, 1941), E. a. ssp. bilselii (Verhoeff, 1941), E. a. var. fasciatograecus (Verhoeff, 1901). E. alhanicus (Verhoeff, 1934), E. slorkani (Verhoeff, 1934), and, probably, E. a. ssp. anoplus Chamberlin, 1952, E. a. ssp. mesobius Chamberlin, 1952, E. acigolensis Chamberlin, 1952, E. agamus Chamberlin, 1952, E. gamus Chamberlin, 1952, E. lamprus Chamberlin, 1952, E. mediolus Chamberlin, 1952, E. segregans Chamberlin, 1952, E. sternethus Chamberlin, 1952, E. syngenes Chamberlin, 1952, and E. telus Chamberlin, 1952. Two subspecies and a number of varieties have been associated with fasciatus, but probably they belong to the apenninigenus group. In fact, the name bosniensis Latzel may, after a re-examination of the type material, prove to be the correct name for apenninigenus. Pending a revision of the types the names of these subspecies and varieties are E. fasciatus ssp. bosniensis (Latzel, 1888), E. f. ssp. bosniensis var. calabrensis (Attems, 1929), E. f. ssp. bosniensis var. flavescens (Verhoeff, 1900), E. f. ssp. bosniensis var. postsulcatus (Verhoeff, 1901), E. f. ssp. graecus (Verhoeff, 1899), E. f. ssp. graecus var. pictus (Attems, 1902), E. f. ssp. graecus var. unicolor (Attems, 1902). Of the remaining forms referable to Eupolybothrus s. str. may be mentioned E. praecursor (Attems, 1902), E. p. ssp. alarichi (Attems, 1934), E. mesopotamius (Verhoeff, 1944), E. athenarum (Kanellis, 1959), E. dubius (Manfredi, 1948), E. longicornis (Risso, 1826), E. l. ssp. martini (Brolemann, 1896), E. gloriastygis (Absolon, 1935), and E. andreevi Matic, 1964. Although the number of described srecies in this subgenus is quite impressive, the number of well recognizable forms is small, and no doubt a revision of the types will result here in a considerable clean-up.	en	C. A. W. Jeekel (1967): On two Italian Lithobius species described by Silvestri, with taxonomic notes on the genus Eupolybothrus Verhoeff (Chilopoda, Lithobiida). BEAUFORTIA SERIES OF MISCELLANEOUS PUBLICATIONS 14, No. 175: 165-175, URL: http://un.availab.le
365D904B95C590941B0430F9A99384F8.taxon	description	This subgenus is characterized by the absence of VCm and VCa spines on the 15 th leg, which has a single claw. Projections present in the 7 th, 9 th, 11 th and 13 th tergites, sometimes also on the 6 th. Male gonopods long. 15 th leg in male without modifications.	en	C. A. W. Jeekel (1967): On two Italian Lithobius species described by Silvestri, with taxonomic notes on the genus Eupolybothrus Verhoeff (Chilopoda, Lithobiida). BEAUFORTIA SERIES OF MISCELLANEOUS PUBLICATIONS 14, No. 175: 165-175, URL: http://un.availab.le
365D904B95C590941B0430F9A99384F8.taxon	diagnosis	The type-species is Eupolybothrus leptopus (Latzel, 1880) (= Lithobius leptopus Latzel, 1880, Die Myriopoden der oesterreichisch-uingarischen Monarchie 1: 53), which has been recorded from southern Germany. Switzerland, and Czechoslovakia to Rumania and Jugoslavia. In this species Verhoeff (1937) has attempted to distinguish some subspecies and varieties which, however, seem rather weakly characterized and which need further definition. Besides the type-species the subgenus includes also E. cerberus (Verhoeff, 1929) and E. cerberus ssp. brentanus (Verhoeff, 1931) from northeastern Italy and northwestern Jugoslavia, both cavernicolous.	en	C. A. W. Jeekel (1967): On two Italian Lithobius species described by Silvestri, with taxonomic notes on the genus Eupolybothrus Verhoeff (Chilopoda, Lithobiida). BEAUFORTIA SERIES OF MISCELLANEOUS PUBLICATIONS 14, No. 175: 165-175, URL: http://un.availab.le
DE5B7E9C313B033D096C192C99FBBB34.taxon	diagnosis	Verhoeff based this subgenus monotypically on E. transsylvanicus (Latzel, 1882). to which he added E. leostygis and E. macedonicus (Verhoeff, 1943) in 1943. As has been pointed out already, leostygis is more properly located in the subgenus Schizopolybothrus, which leaves only two species in Mesobothrus. The range of these two includes Rumania, Jugoslavia and Bulgaria.	en	C. A. W. Jeekel (1967): On two Italian Lithobius species described by Silvestri, with taxonomic notes on the genus Eupolybothrus Verhoeff (Chilopoda, Lithobiida). BEAUFORTIA SERIES OF MISCELLANEOUS PUBLICATIONS 14, No. 175: 165-175, URL: http://un.availab.le
DE5B7E9C313B033D096C192C99FBBB34.taxon	description	The subgenus is characterized by the absence of a VCm spine and the presence of one or two VCa spines on the 15 th leg, which has a single claw. Projections are present in the 9 th, 11 th and 13 th tergites, and, in transsylvanicus, also in the 6 th and 7 th tergites. Male gonopods long, the genital sternite of the male medially inci sed. 15 th leg of the male with the femur deeply fur rowed. Ventral spinulation of the 15 th leg: 0, 1, 3, 2, 2.	en	C. A. W. Jeekel (1967): On two Italian Lithobius species described by Silvestri, with taxonomic notes on the genus Eupolybothrus Verhoeff (Chilopoda, Lithobiida). BEAUFORTIA SERIES OF MISCELLANEOUS PUBLICATIONS 14, No. 175: 165-175, URL: http://un.availab.le
686885E731B3033B2CBB09EA17F7C13A.taxon	diagnosis	In 1934 Verhoeff used the name Parapolybothrus for a subgenus including E. electrinus (Verhoeff, 1934), E. herzegowinensis (Verhoeff, 1900), E. obrovensis (Verhoeff, 1930), and E. elongatus (Newport, 1849). As no type-species was designated the name Parapolybothrus Verhoeff is an unavailable name. By designating E. electrinus as type in 1963 I va lidated the name.	en	C. A. W. Jeekel (1967): On two Italian Lithobius species described by Silvestri, with taxonomic notes on the genus Eupolybothrus Verhoeff (Chilopoda, Lithobiida). BEAUFORTIA SERIES OF MISCELLANEOUS PUBLICATIONS 14, No. 175: 165-175, URL: http://un.availab.le
686885E731B3033B2CBB09EA17F7C13A.taxon	description	The subgenus is characterized by the absence of a VCm spine and the presence of a VCa spine on the 15 th leg, which has a single claw. Projections are present in the 6 th, 7 th, 9 th, 11 th and 13 th tergites. Ventral spinulation of the 15 th leg: 0, 1, 3, 3, 1 - 2. Male gonopods short, two-jointed, the genital sternite scarcely or not emargmate.	en	C. A. W. Jeekel (1967): On two Italian Lithobius species described by Silvestri, with taxonomic notes on the genus Eupolybothrus Verhoeff (Chilopoda, Lithobiida). BEAUFORTIA SERIES OF MISCELLANEOUS PUBLICATIONS 14, No. 175: 165-175, URL: http://un.availab.le
686885E731B3033B2CBB09EA17F7C13A.taxon	discussion	The species referable to this subgenus can be arranged in three categories. I. The prefemur of the 15 th leg of the male inflated just proximad of the middle on the caudal (medial) side. Here belong E. electrinus, E. electrinus ssp. paulianus (Manfredi, 1956), E. vulcanius (Verhoeff, 1942), E. frederici (Manfredi, 1947), and probably, although the male is not known, E. imperialis (Meinert, 1872). All these species came from Italy; paulianus was described from a cave. II. The prefemur of the 15 th leg of the male with a conical protuberance just proximad of the middle on the caudal (medial) side. Here belongs only one cavernicolous species from northwestern Jugoslavia, E. obrovensis.	en	C. A. W. Jeekel (1967): On two Italian Lithobius species described by Silvestri, with taxonomic notes on the genus Eupolybothrus Verhoeff (Chilopoda, Lithobiida). BEAUFORTIA SERIES OF MISCELLANEOUS PUBLICATIONS 14, No. 175: 165-175, URL: http://un.availab.le
686885E731B3033B2CBB09EA17F7C13A.taxon	distribution	III. Prefemur of the 15 th leg of the male without inflation or protuberance.	en	C. A. W. Jeekel (1967): On two Italian Lithobius species described by Silvestri, with taxonomic notes on the genus Eupolybothrus Verhoeff (Chilopoda, Lithobiida). BEAUFORTIA SERIES OF MISCELLANEOUS PUBLICATIONS 14, No. 175: 165-175, URL: http://un.availab.le
686885E731B3033B2CBB09EA17F7C13A.taxon	discussion	Here only E. herzegowinensis, from Jugoslavia. The distinction between the species of the first category is hardly possible, and it seems likely that only one species is actually involved.	en	C. A. W. Jeekel (1967): On two Italian Lithobius species described by Silvestri, with taxonomic notes on the genus Eupolybothrus Verhoeff (Chilopoda, Lithobiida). BEAUFORTIA SERIES OF MISCELLANEOUS PUBLICATIONS 14, No. 175: 165-175, URL: http://un.availab.le
1C7BED453FDD0D597C3B338BA4DC37A0.taxon	diagnosis	The type-species, Lithobius koenigi Verhoeff, 1891, is probably the same as Lithobius elongatus Newport, 1849, and Lithobius impressus C. L. Koch, 1841, all of which were described from North Africa. For some reason most authors have used the name elongatus in recent literature, although probably impressus or even nudicornis Gervais, 1837, will eventually prove to be the valid name. As subspecies and varieties of elongatus have been described E. elongatus var. oraniensis (Verhoeff, 1901), E. e. ssp. corsicus (Leger & Duboscq, 1903), E. e. ssp. alpinus (Broelemann, 1930), E. e. ssp. calabrus (Manfredi, 1933), E. e. ssp. aprutianus (Manfredi, 1950), E. e. ssp. levis (Verhoeff, 1943), E. e. ssp. imperanus (Verhoeff, 1937), and E. e. ssp. sardus (Manfredi, 1956).	en	C. A. W. Jeekel (1967): On two Italian Lithobius species described by Silvestri, with taxonomic notes on the genus Eupolybothrus Verhoeff (Chilopoda, Lithobiida). BEAUFORTIA SERIES OF MISCELLANEOUS PUBLICATIONS 14, No. 175: 165-175, URL: http://un.availab.le
1C7BED453FDD0D597C3B338BA4DC37A0.taxon	description	Allopolybothrus is characterized by the absence of a VCm spine and the presence of a VCa spine on the 15 th leg, which has a single claw. Projections present in the 9 th, 11 th and 13 th tergites, often reduced in the 9 th. Ventral spinulation of the 15 th leg: 0, 1, 3 - 4, 1 - 2, 0 - 1, (1). Male gonopods short, single-segmented.	en	C. A. W. Jeekel (1967): On two Italian Lithobius species described by Silvestri, with taxonomic notes on the genus Eupolybothrus Verhoeff (Chilopoda, Lithobiida). BEAUFORTIA SERIES OF MISCELLANEOUS PUBLICATIONS 14, No. 175: 165-175, URL: http://un.availab.le
1C7BED453FDD0D597C3B338BA4DC37A0.taxon	distribution	Besides North Africa, the range of the subgenus includes Spain, southeastern France, Italy, and the larger western Mediterranean islands. Probably only one species is involved in which a number of subspecies may be recognized, but the majority of published descriptions are based on a far too scanty material.	en	C. A. W. Jeekel (1967): On two Italian Lithobius species described by Silvestri, with taxonomic notes on the genus Eupolybothrus Verhoeff (Chilopoda, Lithobiida). BEAUFORTIA SERIES OF MISCELLANEOUS PUBLICATIONS 14, No. 175: 165-175, URL: http://un.availab.le
