taxonID	type	description	language	source
E2598797FFB1FFDCFF485849FA4F5FBA.taxon	type_taxon	Type species. Blatta longipalpa Fabricius, 1798 (= Blatta supellectilium Serville, 1839), by original designation.	en	Anisyutkin, Leonid N., Vasilenko, Dmitry V., Perkovsky, Evgeny E. (2024): New data on the genus Supella Shelford, 1911 (Dictyoptera: Pseudophyllodromiidae) with description of female of S. eocenica Anisyutkin et Perkovsky, 2023 from Rovno amber. Zootaxa 5448 (3): 439-445, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5448.3.7, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5360.3.8
E2598797FFB1FFDEFF485885FD7959D6.taxon	description	(Fig. 1 A – C)	en	Anisyutkin, Leonid N., Vasilenko, Dmitry V., Perkovsky, Evgeny E. (2024): New data on the genus Supella Shelford, 1911 (Dictyoptera: Pseudophyllodromiidae) with description of female of S. eocenica Anisyutkin et Perkovsky, 2023 from Rovno amber. Zootaxa 5448 (3): 439-445, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5448.3.7, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5360.3.8
E2598797FFB1FFDEFF485885FD7959D6.taxon	materials_examined	Material. Yemen, “ Jemen, PS 1 [? — illegible inscription — L. A.] Sanaa 17. X N. Filippov ” — 1 male; Turkey, “ Constantinople 31 V 09 Pliginskii ” (label in Russian); “ Supella supellictellium Serv. det. B. - B. ” [Bey-Bienko — L. A.] — 1 female.	en	Anisyutkin, Leonid N., Vasilenko, Dmitry V., Perkovsky, Evgeny E. (2024): New data on the genus Supella Shelford, 1911 (Dictyoptera: Pseudophyllodromiidae) with description of female of S. eocenica Anisyutkin et Perkovsky, 2023 from Rovno amber. Zootaxa 5448 (3): 439-445, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5448.3.7, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5360.3.8
E2598797FFB1FFDEFF485885FD7959D6.taxon	description	The detailed descriptions of this species (as S. supellectillium) were provided by J. A. G. Renh (1947) and J. W. H. Rehn (1951). In the latter paper, the structure of the tegmina and wings is examined in detail. Nevertheless, we consider it necessary to redescribe the structure of the tegmina and wings of S. longipalpa for the following reasons. Firstly, Rehn (1951) limited his description to fully alate forms only. The females of S. longipalpa are brachypterous (sensu Anisyutkin 2022) and varying degrees of shortening of the tegmina and wings are common among members of the genus (Rehn 1947). Secondly, Rehn (1951) ignored intercalated veins in his description and illustrations, whereas they are numerous in the tegmina and wings (Fig. 1 A – D). Ignoring intercalated veins can lead to serious errors, especially in interpreting fossil material where it is difficult to trace the bases of all the veins. Redescription. Male. Tegmina and wings fully developed (Fig. 1 A, B), surpassed abdominal apex (forma macroptera sensu Anisyutkin 2022). Tegmina (Fig. 1 A) with costal field short and narrow; radial field large, about as wide as fused median and cubital ones; anal field elongated, about one third of tegmen length. Tegminal venation subobsolete in medio-posterior part of tegmen (proximal parts of posterior rami of M + CuA in medial part of tegmen indistinct) and in anal field; Sc simple, distinctly thickened and short, about 1 / 3 – 1 / 4 of tegmen length; R curved proximally, with 18 regular or pectinate anterior rami and 4 branched apical rami, 1 st anterior ramus (1 st vein behind Sc) weak; M and CuA not separated, with 12 – 14 simple or branched oblique veins; intercalated veins numerous, present in median and cubital fields; bifurcated vein of unclear nature located before CuP; CuP distinct, weakly curved; plical notch indistinct; 5 weak anal veins present; transverse veins weak and very few in number, present in medio-cubital field only. Wings (Fig. 1 B) with weak and simple Sc; R 1 weak, with 2 – 3 rami, posterior ramus weakly clubbed; RA with 9 anterior rami, 5 of them weakly clubbed; M long and weak, twice bifurcated distally; CuA pectinate, with 4 complete and 1 incomplete (not reaching to wing margin) veins; long and simple basally interrupted vein (Fig. 1 B, 1 pl.) located posterior to CuA, probably corresponding to 1 st plical vein (sensu Rehn 1951) or CuP (probably CuP + A 1 sensu Bey-Bienko 1950); next vein (Fig. 1 B, 2 pl.) short and incrassated basally, incomplete, probably corresponding to 2 nd plical vein (sensu Rehn 1951) (probably A 2 sensu Bey-Bienko 1950); third vein (Fig. 1 B, 3 pl.) simple and basally interrupted, probably corresponding to 3 rd plical vein (sensu Rehn 1951); anal fan consisting of 12 veins; 1 st anal vein with 4 branches; intercalated veins absent, weak transverse veins present. Female. Brachypterous, tegmina and wings approximately equal in length, reaching 5 th abdominal tergite. Tegmina with distinct venation (Fig. 1 C), pattern of venation similar to those of macropterous form; Sc simple, curved and distinctly thickened; R with 15 regular or pectinate anterior and apical rami, 1 st – 3 rd anterior rami close to each other; M and CuA not separated, with 10 simple or branched oblique veins; intercalated veins short and weak, present in median and cubital fields; CuP distinct, weakly curved; plical notch indistinct; 4 weak anal veins present; transverse veins weak, present in medio-cubital field only. Wings with distinct venation, similar to that of the macropterous form, but simplified.	en	Anisyutkin, Leonid N., Vasilenko, Dmitry V., Perkovsky, Evgeny E. (2024): New data on the genus Supella Shelford, 1911 (Dictyoptera: Pseudophyllodromiidae) with description of female of S. eocenica Anisyutkin et Perkovsky, 2023 from Rovno amber. Zootaxa 5448 (3): 439-445, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5448.3.7, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5360.3.8
E2598797FFB1FFDEFF485885FD7959D6.taxon	discussion	Notes. It should be noted that the shortening of the brachypterous tegmina in females occurs due to a decrease in the length of the distal part of the tegmen. The proximal part of the brachypteran tegmen (approximately proximal to the anal field) is practically unchanged as compared with macropterous form. Some discrepancies in our description and that of Rehn (1951), namely number of veins or branches, in our opinion are explained by intraspecific variability.	en	Anisyutkin, Leonid N., Vasilenko, Dmitry V., Perkovsky, Evgeny E. (2024): New data on the genus Supella Shelford, 1911 (Dictyoptera: Pseudophyllodromiidae) with description of female of S. eocenica Anisyutkin et Perkovsky, 2023 from Rovno amber. Zootaxa 5448 (3): 439-445, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5448.3.7, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5360.3.8
E2598797FFB3FFD8FF485F69FBA159EA.taxon	description	(Figs 1 D, 2 A – D)	en	Anisyutkin, Leonid N., Vasilenko, Dmitry V., Perkovsky, Evgeny E. (2024): New data on the genus Supella Shelford, 1911 (Dictyoptera: Pseudophyllodromiidae) with description of female of S. eocenica Anisyutkin et Perkovsky, 2023 from Rovno amber. Zootaxa 5448 (3): 439-445, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5448.3.7, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5360.3.8
E2598797FFB3FFD8FF485F69FBA159EA.taxon	materials_examined	New material. SIZK UA- 29000, Rovno amber, late Eocene. Syninclusions: Acari: Bdellidae; Aranei; Collembola, Entomobryomorpha; Collembola, Poduromorpha; three specimens of Drepanosiphidae (Aphidoidea) from three different species; Psychodidae; two specimens of Sciaridae from different species; Thysanoptera; worker of the ant Ctenobethylus goepperti Mayr; stellate hairs (Fig. 2 A).	en	Anisyutkin, Leonid N., Vasilenko, Dmitry V., Perkovsky, Evgeny E. (2024): New data on the genus Supella Shelford, 1911 (Dictyoptera: Pseudophyllodromiidae) with description of female of S. eocenica Anisyutkin et Perkovsky, 2023 from Rovno amber. Zootaxa 5448 (3): 439-445, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5448.3.7, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5360.3.8
E2598797FFB3FFD8FF485F69FBA159EA.taxon	description	Description. Female (previously unknown). General coloration, as far as can be judged from the cockroach inclusion, light yellowish (Fig. 2 B – D); head, pronotum from below, thoracal and abdominal sternites, tegmina, wings, coxae and femora from below and ootheca with scattered dark (black?) dots; larger dots present on tegmina, two large dark spots present on trochanter and genital plate. Dense pubescence present on antennae and tarsi (Fig. 2 B – D); cerci, genital plate and in less degree adjacent abdominal sternites and ootheca densely covered with large chaetae. Surfaces smooth, visible punctuation absent. Structure of head practically indistinguishable. Antennae long, longer than length of body. Pronotum widened caudally, with lateral margins widely rounded and posterior — weakly caudally projected (Fig. 2 B). Tegmina and wings approximately equal to length of the abdomen or slightly surpassed abdominal apex (Figs. 1 D, 2 A – D). Tegmina (Figs. 1 D, 2 B, C) with costal field narrow; radial field large, about as wide as fused median and cubital ones; anal field about one third of tegmen length. Tegminal venation distinct; Sc simple, nearly straight and thickened; R nearly straight, with more than 19 regular or pectinate anterior apical rami, 1 st – 3 rd anterior rami close to each other; M and CuA not separated, with more than 13 simple or branched oblique veins; bifurcated vein located before CuP; CuP distinct, weakly curved; at least 2 visible anal veins present; intercalated veins numerous, present in radial, median and cubital fields; transverse veins sparse and not numerous. Wings with distinct venation. Legs with well developed armament (Fig. 2 B, C). Anterior margin of fore femora armed according to type A (sensu Bey-Bienko 1950; Roth 2003), with numerous spines of equal size and 2 (? — difficult to distinguish on inclusion) larger apical spines. Hind tarsus (Fig. 2 C) with metatarsus longer than other segments combined, 2 nd – 4 th segments short; claws symmetrical; arolium large, about as long as claw length. Abdominal sternites without visible specializations (Fig. 2 B). Cerci long, apically acute, slightly longer than genital plate (Fig. 2 D), with at least 10 distinctly separated segments. Genital plate subtriangular in shape, weakly incised caudally (Fig. 2 D). Ootheca short and bulked, with distinct dorsal keel (Fig. 2 B). Measurements (mm). Total length 11.4 (as preserved, from head to ootheca apex); pronotum width 3.1; tegmen length 8.0; tegmen width 2.3; hind femur length 3.6; hind tibia length 3.6; ootheca width 1.6. All measurements are approximate due to inclusion distortion and cockroach deformation.	en	Anisyutkin, Leonid N., Vasilenko, Dmitry V., Perkovsky, Evgeny E. (2024): New data on the genus Supella Shelford, 1911 (Dictyoptera: Pseudophyllodromiidae) with description of female of S. eocenica Anisyutkin et Perkovsky, 2023 from Rovno amber. Zootaxa 5448 (3): 439-445, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5448.3.7, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5360.3.8
E2598797FFB3FFD8FF485F69FBA159EA.taxon	discussion	Notes. The remarkable similarity in the structure of the tegmina of the above-described specimen (Fig. 1 D) and the brachypterous female of S. longipalpa (Fig. 1 C, D) leaves no doubt that it belongs to the genus Supella. An extinct species of the genus Supella, S. eocenica, was previously described by us from Rovno amber based on a single male (Anisyutkin and Perkovsky 2023). Attribution of males and females of cockroaches, especially in the case of developed sexual dimorphism, is complex even for extant cockroaches. Nevertheless, we preferred to refrain from the new species erection, and provisionally classify the female described above as S. eocenica. We hope that further research of Rovno amber will resolve this issue. It can be supposed that the process of shortening of the tegmina and wings has begun in the female of S. eocenica. This is evidenced by the relatively short and wide tegmina, although exceeding the length of the abdomen, and the convex anterior margin of the tegmen (compare Figs. 1 D, 2 C with Fig. 1 A, C). The last character is characteristic of brachypterous tegmina. The homologation of the bifurcated vein located immediately anterior to CuP is unclear. This vein may be the last branch of M + CuA, but it may also be an independent CuA. In the latter case, the vein system lying anterior of this vein is M, and not M + CuA. Further research is needed to resolve this issue. It is also necessary to note an interesting character present in females of S. longipalpa and S. eocenica — the closeness of the first anterior rami of R in the tegmina (Fig. 1 C, D). In the future, it is necessary to study the distribution of this character in representatives of the genus Supella and related genera.	en	Anisyutkin, Leonid N., Vasilenko, Dmitry V., Perkovsky, Evgeny E. (2024): New data on the genus Supella Shelford, 1911 (Dictyoptera: Pseudophyllodromiidae) with description of female of S. eocenica Anisyutkin et Perkovsky, 2023 from Rovno amber. Zootaxa 5448 (3): 439-445, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.5448.3.7, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.5360.3.8
