identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
E15B878EFFF35F53FF43FC3A7EB3B6DB.text	E15B878EFFF35F53FF43FC3A7EB3B6DB.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Eocenomyrma ukrainica Radchenko & Dlussky 2016	<div><p>Eocenomyrma ukrainica sp. n.</p><p>M a t e r i a l e x a m i n e d. Holotype, male, SIZK K-3076, and paratype, gyne, SIZK K-27012, both from Klesov, Rovno amber, Late Eocene.</p><p>E t y m o l o g y. Named after Ukraine, country where the type material of this species was found.</p><p>M a l e (figs 1–4). Total length: ca. 2.45 mm. Head distinctly longer than width, with convex sides, moderately rounded occipital corners and quite strongly convex occipital margin. Clypeus convex (seen in profile), with two not coarse lateral carinae, its anterior margin shallowly and widely concave. Eyes not very big, their maximal diameter about 3 times smaller than length of head, situated distinctly in front of midlength of sides of head, so that temples longer than maximum diameter of eye. Ocelli well developed though not big. Antennae 13-segmented, with not well defined 3-segmented club, scape of moderate length, far not reaching occipital margin, subequal to total length of 1st to 5th funicular segments. Mandibles elongate-triangular, with distinct masticatory margin, which is with four small acute teeth. Palp formula 4, 3.</p><p>Mesosoma relatively long, scutum not strongly convex, Mayrian furrows well developed. Propodeum with distinct short acute teeth, its dorsal surface subequal to posterior one. Petiole and postpetiole barely visible, but petiole seems with quite short peduncle and high node with rounded dorsum; postpetiole higher than length, with rounded dorsum. Middle and hind tibiae without spurs, pretarsal claws simple.</p><p>Forewing venation rather peculiar: veins are very coarse, closed cell 1r+2r long and marrow, and closed cell mcu extremely small (especially on left wing). Except for those, general character of venation similar to that of gyne (see below).</p><p>Head dorsum finely but densely punctated, frons laterally with fine longitudinal rugulae, narrow central band on frons between frontal triangle and anterior ocellus, as well as frontal triangle and central part of clypeus, smooth and shiny; mandibles with fine longitudinal rugulosity, appear shiny. Pronotum with very fine transversal striae, anterior part of scutum between Mayrian furrows with fine superficial microstriation, its remainder part and scutellum smooth and shiny. Mesopleura and sides of propodeum with somewhat coarser longitudinal rugulosity. Gaster smooth and shiny.</p><p>Whole body with not abundant, rather short suberect hairs; scape and legs with sparse decumbent pilosity.</p><p>Measurements (in mm): HL 0.53, HW 0.45, SL 0.27, OL 0.19, ML 0.75, MH 0.43, HTL 0.40, total length ca. 2.45.</p><p>Indices: HL/HW 1.18, SL/HL 0.50, SL/HW 0.59, OL/HL 0.35, ML/MH 1.75.</p><p>G y n e (figs 5, 6). Total length ca. 3 mm. Head width is not properly measurable, but head seems elongate, with almost straight sides, rounded occipital corners and slightly convex occipital margin. Eyes of moderate size, situated in front of midlength of sides of head, length of genae subequal to maximum diameter of eye. Ocelli rather small. Antennae 12-segmented, with 3-segmented club, first funicular segment ca. twice longer than width, 2nd to 8th segments somewhat longer than width; scape relatively short, not reaching occipital margin. Clypeus with two lateral carinae, anterior clypeal margin shallowly and widely concave. Mandibles obscured in the specimen.</p><p>Mesosoma relatively short, less than 1.5 times longer than height, scutum slightly convex, does not overlap pronotum. Propodeum with quite long thin, not widened at base acute spines, its dorsal surface somewhat shorter than posterior one, propodeal lobes angulated at apices, but not sharply pointed. Petiole long and quite low, with long peduncle, ca. 1.8 times longer than height, its anterior surface distinctly concave, petiolar node with very narrowly rounded dorsum, almost cuneiform. Postpetiole subdlobular. Spur on middle tibia obscured, but hind tibiae with small simple spur.</p><p>Forewing with closed cells 1r+2r and mcu, cell 3r open posteriorly, cell rm absent; cell 1r+2r very long, ca. twice longer than width. Vein section 1RS slightly inclined posteriorly. Cell mcu trapezoid (not pentagonal), far not reaching distally level of pterostigmal base. Cross-vein cu-a merging with vein section 1M+Cu far proximally than cell mcu (vein section 2M+Cu much longer than cross-vein cu-a).</p><p>Head dorsum with not coarse but dense longitudinal, slightly sinuous rugosity, reticulation developed on sides of head and on occipital region. Pronotum with five transversal rugae, scutum and scutellum with finer, dense longitudinal rugae, mesopleura and sides of propodeum with coarser longitudinal, slightly sinuous rugae. Petiole densely and quite coarsely punctated, postpetiole with les coarse punctation.</p><p>Whole body with not abundant straight erect to suberect hairs; scape and legs with short subdecumbent pilosity.</p><p>Measurements (in mm): HL 0.65, SL 0.43, OL 0.13, ML 0.75, MH 0.51, ScW 0.45, PL 0.32, PH 0.18, PPL 0.19, PPH 0.19, HTL 0.40, ESL 0.11, total length ca. 3.00.</p><p>Indices: SL/HL 0.65, OL/HL 0.20, PL/HL 0.49, PL/PH 1.79, PPL/HL 0.29, PPL/PPH 1.00, ESL/HL 0.17, ML/MH 1.47.</p><p>Workers unknown.</p><p>C o m p a r a t i v e d i a g n o s i s. We may compare only gyne of E. ukrainica with the workers of other species because males of other species are unknown. Gyne of E. ukrainica well differs from E. breviscapa sp. n. by the another sculpture (notpunctated) of the head, mesosoma and waist; it differs from E. elegantula Dlussky et Radchenko by the mostly longitudinally rugulose sculpture on the head and mesosoma instead the fine and dense reticulation in the latter species; from E. electrina Dlussky et Radchenko it differs by the distinctly longer petiole (PL/PH 1.79 vs. 1.27), by the much shorter, straight propodeal spines (ESL/ HL 0.17 vs. 0.33), by the sculpture of the mesosoma (mostly longitudinally rugose vs. completely coarsely reticulated in the latter species). Similarly to the preceding species, E. ukrainica differs from E. orthospina Dlussky et Radchenko by the shorter propodeal spines (ESL/HL 0.17 vs.&gt; 0.35) and by the similar pattern of the mesosomal sculpture. At last, by the body sculpture E. ukrainica the most resembles E. rugosostriata (Mayr), but duffers from it by the distinctly shorter and straight propodeal spines (ESL/HL 0.17 vs.&gt; 0.30).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/E15B878EFFF35F53FF43FC3A7EB3B6DB	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Radchenko, A. G.;Dlussky, G. M.	Radchenko, A. G., Dlussky, G. M. (2016): Further Data On The Extinct Ant Genus Eocenomyrma (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Vestnik Zoologii 50 (5): 395-406, DOI: 10.1515/vzoo-2016-0046, URL: http://content.sciendo.com/view/journals/vzoo/50/5/article-p395.xml
E15B878EFFF75F5CFD1AFA7F7925B29B.text	E15B878EFFF75F5CFD1AFA7F7925B29B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Eocenomyrma breviscapa	<div><p>Eocenomyrma breviscapa sp. n.</p><p>M a t e r i a l e x a m i n e d. Holotype, worker, SIZK K-5518, Klesov, Rovno amber, Late Eocene.</p><p>E t y m o l o g y. From the Latin words “ brevis ” — short, and “ scapus ” — scape, meaning that the antennal scape is short.</p><p>W o r k e r (figs 7–11). Total length ca. 2.4 mm. Head short, 1.07 times longer than width, with convex sides, rounded occipital corners and convex occipital margin. Eyes of moderate size, their maximum diameter 0.21 of head length, situated at midlength of lateral sided of head. Antennae 12-segmented, with distinct, quite big 3-segmented club that is subequal to total length of remainder funicular segments, first funicular segment ca. 1.5 times longer than width, 2–8th segments transversal; scape very short, nearly twice shorter than head length, far not reaching occipital margin. Central part of clypeus longitudinally concave, with two lateral longitudinal carinae and well marked anterolateral corners, its anterior margin concave, with pair of long setae on anterolateral corners. Clypeus posteriorly widely inserted between frontal lobes; frontal lobes anteriorly reaching anterior clypeal margin. Palp formula 4, 3. Mandibles elongate-triangular, masticatory margin with longer apical tooth and small 5 denticles.</p><p>Mesosoma ca. 2.8 times longer than height, promesonotal suture developed, metanotal groove deep. Anterior margin of pronotum slightly convex, humeri narrowly rounded. Propodeal spines rather short, straight, widened at base and acute at apex, directed posteriorly at an angle ca. 45 o (seen in profile), very slightly divergent (seen from above). Propodeal lobes rounded. Petiole with very short peduncle, quite high, only little longer than height, its anterior surface steep, very slightly concave, meets with dorsal surface of node at an acute angle, dorsal plate short ant strongly declined posteriorly so that petiole seems cuneiform (seen in profile). Postpetiole wider than petiole. Middle and hind tibiae without spur.</p><p>Head dorsum, mesosoma and waist densely punctated, head dorsum additionally with longitudinal striation.</p><p>Body with sparse, rather short, blunt straight suberect hairs, scape and legs with decumbent pilosity.</p><p>Measurements (in mm): HL 0.62, HW 0.57, FW 0.17, FLW 0.18, SL 0.33, OL 0.13, PnW 0.36, ML 0.74, MH 0.30, PL 0,22, PW 0.23, PH 0.20, PPL 0.09, PPW 0.27, PPH 0.20, ESL 0.09, ESD 0.20, HTL 0.33, total length ca. 2.4.</p><p>Indices: HL/HW 1.09, FW/HW 0.30, FLW/FW 1.08, SL/HL 0.52, SL/HW 0.57, OL/HL 0.21, PL/HL 0.35, PL/ PH 1.13, PPL/HL 0.15, PPL/PPH 0.47, ESL/HL 0.15, ESL/HW 0.16, ESD/ESL 2.14, ML/MH 2.48.</p><p>G yn e s an d mal e s un know n.</p><p>C o m p a r a t i v e d i a g n o s i s. E. breviscapa well differs from all known Eocenomyrma species (including described here gyne of E. ukrainica) by the punctated head, mesosoma and waist, by the much shorter, cuneiform petiole (PL/ PH 1.13 vs.&gt; 1.25 in other species), by the shorter propodeal spines (ESL/HW 0.16 vs.&gt; 0.30 in other species), and by the distinctly shorter scape (SL/HL 0.52 vs.&gt; 0.58, usually&gt; 0.60 in other species).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/E15B878EFFF75F5CFD1AFA7F7925B29B	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Radchenko, A. G.;Dlussky, G. M.	Radchenko, A. G., Dlussky, G. M. (2016): Further Data On The Extinct Ant Genus Eocenomyrma (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Vestnik Zoologii 50 (5): 395-406, DOI: 10.1515/vzoo-2016-0046, URL: http://content.sciendo.com/view/journals/vzoo/50/5/article-p395.xml
E15B878EFFF85F5CFF48FDE67DC6B071.text	E15B878EFFF85F5CFF48FDE67DC6B071.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Eocenomyrma rugosostriata (Mayr 1868)	<div><p>E. rugosostriata</p><p>M a t e r i a l e x a m i n e d. 1 worker, Baltic amber, CGC F-6738 .</p><p>Measurements (in mm): HL 1.01, OL 0.22, ML 1.37, MH 0.48, PL 56, PH 0.29, PPL 0.35, PPH 0.29, ESL 0.33, HTL 0.56, total length ca. 4.30.</p><p>Indices: PL/HL 0.55, PL/ PH 1.95, PPL/HL 0.35, PPL/PPH 1.23, ESL/HL 0.32, ML/MH 2.84.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/E15B878EFFF85F5CFF48FDE67DC6B071	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Radchenko, A. G.;Dlussky, G. M.	Radchenko, A. G., Dlussky, G. M. (2016): Further Data On The Extinct Ant Genus Eocenomyrma (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Vestnik Zoologii 50 (5): 395-406, DOI: 10.1515/vzoo-2016-0046, URL: http://content.sciendo.com/view/journals/vzoo/50/5/article-p395.xml
E15B878EFFF85F5DFF48FC9979D5B150.text	E15B878EFFF85F5DFF48FC9979D5B150.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Eocenomyrma orthospina Dlussky et Radchenko	<div><p>E. orthospina</p><p>M a t e r i a l e x a m i n e d. Two workers:</p><p>1) Baltic amber, CGC F-6800.</p><p>Measurements (in mm): HL 0.69, HW 0.60, FW 0.27, FLW 0.31, SL 0.46, ML 0.75, PnW 0.75, PL 0.31, PW 0.23, PPL 0.21, PPW 0.30, ESD 0.27, total length ca. 3.0.</p><p>Indices: HL/HW 1.15, FW/HW 0.45, FLW/FW 1.15, SL/HL 0.67, SL/HW 0.77, PL/HL 0.45, PPL/HL 0.30.</p><p>2) Rovno amber, SIZK K-7026 (specimen damaged, without petiole, postpetiole and gaster).</p><p>Measurements (in mm): HL 0.66, HW 0.57, SL 0.52, FW 0.23, FLW 0.26, AL 0.85, PnW 0.39, ESL 0.31, ESD 0.30, HTL 0.52, total length ca. 3.5 (by analogy of ML+HL compare to other species).</p><p>Indices: HL/HW 1.16, SL/HL 0.79, SL/HW 0.91, FW/HW 0.46, FLW/FW 1.13, ESL/ HL 0.47, ESL/HW 0.53.</p><p>A key for the identification of Eocenomyrma species</p><p>1. Head, mesosoma and waist only densely punctated, without rugosity or reticulation (fig. 7). Scape relatively very short, SL/HL 0.52, SL/HW 0.57. Petiole with very short peduncle, PL/ PH 1.13, its anterior surface steep, very slightly concave, meets with dorsal surface of node at an acute angle, dorsal plate short ant strongly declined posteriorly so that petiole seems cuneiform (seen in profile) (figs 8, 10). ..... ................................................................................................................................................ E. breviscapa sp. n.</p><p>– Head, mesosoma and waist longitudinally rugose or reticulated; petiole of another shape, but in any case with much longer peduncle, PL/ PH&gt; 1.25 (figs 5, 6, 12–17) Scape distinctly longer, SL/HL&gt; 0.58, SL/HW&gt; 0.70. ..................................................................................................................................................... 2</p><p>2(1). Gyne: propodeal spines relatively short (ESL/HL 0.17), straight, slightly widened at the base; head dorsum and mesosoma mostly longitudinally rugose, coarse reticulation presents on occipital area of the head (figs 5, 6). ...................................................................................................................... E. ukrainica sp. n.</p><p>– Workers: propodeal spines longer (ESL/HL&gt; 0.23), more widened at the base, often curved down along their length, if straight, then much longer, ESL/HL&gt; 0.35 (figs 12–17). .................................................... 3</p><p>3(2). Head dorsum and mesosoma with longitudinal, slightly sinuous rugosity, without reticulation (fig. 12) ......................................................................................................................................... E. rugosostriata (Mayr)</p><p>– Head dorsum and mesosoma at least partly with reticulation (figs 13–17)................................................ 4</p><p>4(3). Whole head dorsum and mesosoma with fine reticulation; petiolar node with well developed, flattened dorsal plate (fig. 13). ............................................................................... E. elegantul a Dlussky et Radchenko</p><p>– Frons with longitudinal, slightly sinuous rugae, remainder part of head dorsum with coarse reticulation; petiolar node with rounded dorsum, without dorsal plate (figs 14–17). ........................................... 5</p><p>5(4). Propodeal spines thin, not widened at the base, straight, directed backward and upward; petiole with very long peduncle (PL/ PH&gt; 1.90) (figs 14, 15). ............................... E. orthospina Dlussky et Radchenko</p><p>– Propodeal spines massive, widened at the base, slightly curved down along their length, directed mainly backward; petiole with much shorter peduncle (PL/ PH 1.27) (figs 16, 17). ................................................. ...................................................................................................................... E. electrina Dlussky et Radchenko</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/E15B878EFFF85F5DFF48FC9979D5B150	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Radchenko, A. G.;Dlussky, G. M.	Radchenko, A. G., Dlussky, G. M. (2016): Further Data On The Extinct Ant Genus Eocenomyrma (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Vestnik Zoologii 50 (5): 395-406, DOI: 10.1515/vzoo-2016-0046, URL: http://content.sciendo.com/view/journals/vzoo/50/5/article-p395.xml
