identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
E02A6172B6002077FF41FC34FC8CFE1E.text	E02A6172B6002077FF41FC34FC8CFE1E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Agelopsis Jacoby 1896	<div><p>Genus Agelopsis Jacoby, 1896</p><p>Agelopsis Jacoby, 1896: 301 (type species Agelopsis caeruleus Jacoby, 1896, by monotypy); Maulik, 1936: 466 (extended description); Wilcox, 1973: 469 (catalogue); Seeno &amp; Wilcox, 1982: 110; Medvedev &amp; Sprecher-Uebersax, 2005: 313 (key); Beenen, 2010: 469 (catalogue).</p><p>Liroetis subgenus Liroetinus Lopatin, 2004: 621 (type species Liroetis belousovi Lopatin, 2004, by original designation); Beenen, 2010: 479 (catalogue). Syn. nov.</p><p>Zizonia Chen in Chen et al., 1976: 220 (type species Zizonia tibetana Chen, 1976, by original designation). Syn. nov.</p><p>Description. Dorsal side lustrous, metallic bluish, greenish or violet, ventral side, legs and antennae black with slight metallic tint.</p><p>Head almost impunctate, smooth or microsculptured, lustrous, nearly glabrous. Labrum transverse, with several pores bearing pale seta. Interantennal space 0.80–1.12 times as wide as antennal socket. Interocular space wide, 2.90–3.88 time as wide as transverse diameter of eye. Frontal tubercles large, subtriangular or transversely trapezoidal, elevated, lustrous, glabrous, impunctate. Vertex separated from frontal tubercles by deep furrow, impunctate, glabrous. Antennae thin, 0.76–1.00 as long as body, antennomeres I–III lustrous, covered with sparse setae, antennomeres IV–XI dull, covered with dense setae.</p><p>Pronotum 1.11–1.63 times as wide as long, widest at anterior third, lustrous, almost impunctate or covered with fine punctures. Surface with more or less shallow transverse impression at posterior third. Anterior margin unbordered or with very fine border, posterior margin thinly bordered, lateral margins with wider border. Anterior angles pronounced, posterior angles rectangular or obtusangulate, all angles with setigerous pore bearing long pale seta.</p><p>Scutellum wide, subtriangular, with widely rounded apex, impunctate, smooth or microsculptured, glabrous, with rounded apex.</p><p>Elytra ca 1.35–1.90 times as long as wide and 0.52–0.72 times as long as body, glabrous, moderately divergent posteriorly (widest at posterior third), densely covered with fine small confused punctures. Humeral calli well developed. Epipleura impunctate, relatively narrow, gradually narrowing in apical two thirds towards apex.</p><p>Ventral surface subopaque, sparsely covered with fine punctures and pale setae. Last abdominal ventrite in males with posterior margin with two V-shaped incisions, surface with rounded median impression or, in some spe- cies, last ventrite enlarged with median impression forming shallow channel,. Abdominal ventrites III and IV rarely modified (impressed or forming short proces).</p><p>Anterior coxal cavities opened posteriorly. Legs moderately slender. Male metatrochanters sometimes modified. All tibiae with apical spur. Tarsomeres I and II subtriangular. Claws appendiculate.</p><p>Aedeagus symmetrical, more or less flat and in lateral view moderately bent.</p><p>Females. Tarsi usually slightly narrower than in males. Abdomen not modified, posterior margin of last ventrite entire, without incisions. Spermatheca C-shaped, with more or less gradually narrowing apex, nodulus sphaerical or elongate, covered with transverse wrinkles, ductus spermathecae usually curved. Sternite VIII with apical margin with short setae, disc glabrous. Tignum relatively robust, 1.5–2.2 times longer than sternite VIII. Gonocoxae usually with thin basal apodemes (except A. metallicus).</p><p>Differential diagnosis. The genus Agelopsis is characterised by the combination of following characters: anterior coxal cavities open posteriorly, pronotum with transverse impression behind middle, claws appendiculate, middle and posterior tibiae with apical spur, epipleura gradually narrowed towards the apex. The sets of characters to separate Agelopsis from other southeastern Asian genera with transverse pronotal impressions and anterior coxal cavities open are summarized in Tab. 1.</p><p>Three Agelopsis species were originally assigned to the genus Liroetis belonging to the group of genera characterized by aedeagus with a dorsal process starting near the base of aedeagan lobe and directed anteriorly (e.g. Bezděk et al. 2014, Bezděk 2016). Moreover, Liroetis species have no transverse impression on the pronotum.</p><p>Comments on synonymy. The genus Zizonia was established for Zizonia tibetana described from a single female and the description itself is very superficial and uninformative. It was stated that Zizonia is similar to Luperus Geoffroy, 1762 and Calomicrus Dillwyn, 1829 but due to transverse impression on pronotum resembles Paridea Baly, 1886 and Paragetocera Laboissière, 1929 . Explicitely is given that middle and posterior tibiae are without apical spurs (Chen et al. 1976). I had the possibility to study the photograph of the female holotype of Zizonia tibetana and undoubtedly it is congeneric with Agelopsis . The holotype also has the apical spurs on tibiae as was verified by Li-Jie Zhang (2012, pers. comm.). In sum, I propose Zizonia as a new synonym of Agelopsis .</p><p>Liroetinus Lopatin, 2004 (type species Liroetis belousovi Lopatin, 2004) was originally proposed as subgenus of Liroetis . However, Liroetis belousovi differs from true Liroetis species in having completely different structure of aedeagus and transverse impression on pronotum. Because Liroetis belousovi well agrees with Agelopsis species, I transfer it to Agelopsis and propose Liroetinus as a new synonym of Agelopsis .</p><p>Comments. The enlarged metatrochanters in males of some Agelopsis species ( A. metallicus, A. spinipes, and A. traxlerorum sp. nov.) were considered to be a sound production device (Mohamedsaid 2010). As in many galerucine genera the identification of females is difficult and requires the dissection of female genitalia. The identification key is provided from males only.</p><p>Distribution. China, Nepal, northeastern India, Myanmar.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/E02A6172B6002077FF41FC34FC8CFE1E	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Bezděk, Jan	Bezděk, Jan (2020): Revision of Agelopsis (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Galerucinae). Zootaxa 4731 (2): 223-248, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4731.2.3
E02A6172B6022070FF41FB40FB34FBA2.text	E02A6172B6022070FF41FB40FB34FBA2.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Agelopsis aeneoviridis (Lopatin 2004) Bezděk 2020	<div><p>Agelopsis aeneoviridis (Lopatin, 2004), comb. nov.</p><p>(Figs 1–2, 19, 38)</p><p>Liroetis (Liroetinus) aeneoviridis Lopatin, 2004: 618 (original description); Beenen 2010: 479 (catalogue).</p><p>Type locality. “ Sichuan, right bank of Niuzhihe Riv., E of Pusium Village ” .</p><p>Type examined. Holotype: ♂ (ZIN), “ CH, Sichuan, right bank / of Niuzhihe Riv. E of / Pusiun Village / 2200- 2800m, 15- 16.6.2000 / Belousov, Kabak, Davidian [w, p] // Holotypus [r, p] // Liroetis / aeneoviridis sp. / n. [h] / det. I. Lopatin, 200 [p] 2 [w, h]”.</p><p>Redescription. Measurements. Male: 5.9 mm (holotype). Dorsal side glabrous, elongate, widened posteriorly. Head and pronotum metallic blue, elytra metallic green, legs and antennae black with metallic tint, ventral side black, last abdominal ventrite with orange semicircular apex.</p><p>Male (holotype, Fig. 1). Labrum transverse, with shallowly concave anterior margin and rounded anterior angles, surface distinctly convex, with transverse line of pores bearing long seta. Anterior part of head with straight anterior margin, with transverse triangular elevated keel, posteriorly produced to short process forming nasal keel, surface dull, covered with dense microsulpture and scarse several punctures bearing seta. Interantennal space 1.12 times as wide as transverse diameter of antennal socket. Interocular space wide, 3.40 time as wide as transverse diameter of eye. Frontal tubercles subtriangular, elevated, smooth, marginal parts covered with microsculpture, lustrous, separated by thin furrow. Vertex separated from frontal tubercles by deep impressed line, surface impunctate, covered with microsculpture, glabrous. Antennae slender, 0.80 times as long body, length ratio of antennomeres equals 9-5-8-11-10-10-10-10-10-9-9.</p><p>Pronotum transverse, 1.35 times as wide as long, lustrous, glabrous, widest before middle, sparcely covered with distinct punctures. Surface slightly convex with distinct transverse impression at posterior third nearly interrupted in middle. Anterior margin nearly straight, lateral margins rounded, posterior margin nearly straight, bisinuate. Anterior margin with fine distinct border, lateral margins with wider border, posterior margin with distinct narrow border. Anterior angles distinctly swollen, pronounced, posterior angles obtusangulate, pointed, all angles with setigerous pores bearing long pale seta. Scutellum short and wide, subtriangular, with widely rounded apex, microsculptured, glabrous.</p><p>Elytra 1.72 times as long as wide (measured at humeral calli) and 0.61 times as long as body, divergent posteriorly, widest at posterior third. Surface covered with small dense confused punctures. Humeral calli well developed. Epipleura relatively narrow, smooth, glabrous, lustrous, gradually narrowed towards elytral apex. Macropterous.</p><p>Abdomen: last abdominal ventrite with two wide V-shaped sharp incisions, median lobe with parallel lateral margins, middle of ventrite with deep impression with semicircular posterior margin (Fig. 38).</p><p>Metatrochanter not modified. Tarsi: protarsomere I wide, elongate with parallel anterior half, II triangular, I slightly wider than II, length ratio of protarsomeres equals 9-6-4-8, mesotarsomere I wide, elongate with parallel anterior half, metatarsomere I narrow, parallel, length ratio of metatarsomeres equals 11-7-4-9.</p><p>Aedeagus (Fig. 19) symmetrical, robust, slightly extended subapically, apex widely round with indicated tip. In lateral view, apex slightly curved dorsally, basal two thirds widely curved, with distinct angulation at apical third.</p><p>Female. Unknown</p><p>Distribution. China (Sichuan).</p><p>Differential diagnosis. Agelopsis aeneoviridis is characterised by not modified male metatrochanters and abdominal ventrites and by presence of blunt keel behind humerus. The same combination of characters is known only in A. tibetanus . The males of both species can be distinguished by the structure of pronotum (1.35 times as wide as long and with surface punctured in A. aeneoviridis while 1.25 times as wide as long and with surface smooth in A. tibetanus). Aedeagus of A. aeneoviridis is subapically extended and in lateral view with distinct angulation at apical third while aedeagus of A. tibetanus is parallel and in lateral view without angulation (Figs 19, 24).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/E02A6172B6022070FF41FB40FB34FBA2	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Bezděk, Jan	Bezděk, Jan (2020): Revision of Agelopsis (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Galerucinae). Zootaxa 4731 (2): 223-248, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4731.2.3
E02A6172B6052072FF41FBDCFCF5FBA2.text	E02A6172B6052072FF41FBDCFCF5FBA2.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Agelopsis belousovi (Lopatin 2004) Bezděk 2020	<div><p>Agelopsis belousovi (Lopatin, 2004), comb. nov.</p><p>(Figs 3–4, 11, 20, 32–34, 47, 54, 61)</p><p>Liroetis (Liroetinus) belousovi Lopatin, 2004: 620 (original description); Beenen 2010: 479 (catalogue).</p><p>Type locality. “ Sichuan, S of Xichang, W sl. SE of Mt. „4282“ (NE) of Dechang Lunan Shan Mt. Ridge ” .</p><p>Type examined. Holotype: ♂ (ZIN), “ CH, S Sichuan, S of / Xichang, W sl. SE of Mt / „4282“ (NE of Dechang) / Lunan Shan Mt. Ridge / H~ 3000 m, 01.05.2001 / Belousov &amp; Korolev l. [w, p] // Holotypus [r, p] // Liroetis / be- lousovi sp. n. [h] / det. I. Lopatin, 200 [p] 2 [w, h]”.</p><p>Additional material examined. 16 specimens — CHINA: Sichuan: 1 ♂ 1 ♀, Dayi Dafeishui Forest near Dayi, 110 km W of Chengdu, 21.-22.vi.1993, M. Trýzna leg. (VSCN) ; 1 ♂, Emeishan, <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=103.33111&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=29.540277" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 103.33111/lat 29.540277)">Leidongping</a>, 29°32´25´´N 103°19´52´´E, 2420 m, 8.-9.vi.2014, J. Hájek &amp; J. Růžička leg. (NMPC) ; 1 ♂ 1 ♀, Emei Mt., 1000-2000 m, 6.vi.1997, M. Ouda leg. (MOCP) ; 1 ♀, Selong, Sankiangkou, 7.-8.1934, 1000 m, Friedrich leg. (NHMB) ; 2 ♂♂, Emei Shan, Dinshui env., ca. 1400 m, 18.vi.1996, D. Erber leg. (RBCN) ; 1 ♂, road Ya´an to Hanyuan, Ypansan pass, 1780-2350 m, vi.-vii.2007, Puchner leg. (RBCN) ; 4 ♀♀, Emei Shan, vi.1992, without additional data (2 UACB, 2 RBCN) ; 2 ♀♀, Emei Shan, 4.vi.1992, Sauer leg. (UACB) . Yunnan: 1 ♂, Dali env., <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=100.129166&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=25.693611" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 100.129166/lat 25.693611)">Cangshan Mts.</a>, river valley, 25°41´37´´N 100°07´45´´E, 2200 m, 23.v.2002, A. Konstantinov &amp; M. Volkovitsh leg. (USNM) .</p><p>Redescription. Measurements. Males: 6.0– 6.7 mm (holotype 6.7 mm), females: 5.8–6.0 mm. Body oval, widened posteriorly, dorsal side glabrous. Body metallic blue with oil tint, legs and antennae black with metallic tint, last abdominal ventrite with brown semicircular apical part.</p><p>Male (Fig. 11, holotype as in Fig. 3). Labrum transverse, subtrapezoidal, with shallowly concave anterior margin and rounded anterior angles, surface moderately convex, microsculptured, with four setigerous pores (two in middle part, two laterally) bearing long seta. Anterior part of head with straight anterior margin, with transversely concave elevated keel, posteriorly produced to short process, surface dull, with four long setae along anterior margin and additional shorter setae along anterior margin of antennal impressions. Interantennal space narrow, 0.88 times as wide as transverse diameter of antennal socket. Interocular space wide, 3.10 time as wide as transverse diameter of eye. Frontal tubercles transversely subtriangular, elevated, impunctate, lustrous, separated by thin furrow. Vertex separated from frontal tubercles by deep impressed line. Vertex impunctate, glabrous, semiopaque. Antennae slen- der, as long body, length ratio of antennomeres equals 9-5-9-13-13-13-13-12-12-12-15.</p><p>Pronotum transverse, 1.40 times as wide as long, lustrous, glabrous, widest at anterior third, covered with indistinct punctures. Surface moderately convex with distinct transverse impression at posterior third, shallower in middle. Anterior margin widely rounded, lateral margins rounded at anterior half and straight and slightly sinuate posteriorly, posterior margin slightly sinuate in middle, lateraly slightly oblique. Anterior margin unbordered, lateral margins with wider border, posterior margin narrowly bordered in middle part, border gradually wider laterally. Anterior angles swollen, oblique, posterior angles nearly reactangular, all angles with setigerous pores bearing long pale seta. Scutellum subtriangular, with rounded apex, impunctate, glabrous.</p><p>Elytra 1.76 times as long as wide (measured at humeral calli) and 0.69 times as long as body, divergent posteriorly, widest at posterior third. Surface covered with small dense confused punctures. Humeral calli well developed. Epipleura relatively narrow, smooth, glabrous, lustrous, gradually narrowed towards elytral apex. Macropterous.</p><p>Abdomen: last abdominal ventrite enlarged, median lobe apically extended with rounded posterior margin, surface of median lobe with deep narrow sulcus apically shallower and extended; posterior margin of ventrite with deep semicircular emarginations next to median lobe; anterior part of last ventrite elevated in middle, subconical; last ventrite in lateral view distinctly concave. Abdominal vetrite IV with two flat lamellae in middle (Figs 32–34).</p><p>Metatrochanter not modified. Tarsi: protarsomere I elongate, slightly asymmetrical with more bent outer margin, II parallel in apical half, convergent in basal half, length ratio of protarsomeres equals 9-6-4-10, mesotarsomere I elongate, subparallel, length ratio of mesotarsomeres equals 10-6-4-10, metatarsomere I narrow, subparallel, length ratio of metatarsomeres equals 13-7-5-11.</p><p>Aedeagus (Fig. 20) lanceolate, widest in midlength, apex rounded with small subtriangular process with round- ed tip. In lateral view, aedeagus flat and bisinuate, and with wave-shaped incision in midlength of dorsal side. Ven- trally with two wing-like lamellae covered with 11-12 transverse furrows, lamellae connected with lateral margins of aedeagus and laid on ventral side.</p><p>Female. First protarsomere narrow, not enlarged or modified. Antennae filiform, 0.75 times as long body. Abdominal ventrites not modified, posterior margin of last abdominal ventrite entire. Pygidium triangular, distinctly producing elytral outline. Spermatheca with elongate nodulus, cornu C-shaped (Fig. 47). Gonocoxae as in Fig. 61. Sternite VIII elongate with widely rounded apical margin, tignum relatively robust with extended apex, twice longer than sternite VIII (Fig. 54).</p><p>Distribution. China: Sichuan, Yunnan (Lopatin 2004, present study).</p><p>Differential diagnosis. Agelopsis belousovi belongs to the group of species (together with A. konstantinovi sp. nov. and A. malaisei sp. nov.) characterised by not modified male metatrochanters and enlarged last abdominal ventrite with channeled median lobe. All three species can be distinguished by the structure of aedeagus: aedeagus lanceolate with pointed tip, ventrally with two wing-like lamellae in A. belousovi (Fig. 20), apex transversely cut in A. konstantinovi sp. nov. (Fig. 25), and aedeagus flat with strongly curved apical part and carinate dorsal surface in A. malaisei sp. nov. (Fig. 26). Males of Agelopsis belousovi have abdominal ventrite IV with two small flat lamellae in middle and last abdominal ventrite is raised anteriorly (Figs 32–34) while abdominal ventrite IV is unmodified and last abdominal ventrite is more or less flat in A. malaisei sp. nov. (Figs 43, 45). Hind wings of A. konstantinovi sp. nov. are vestigial while well developed in A. belousovi .</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/E02A6172B6052072FF41FBDCFCF5FBA2	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Bezděk, Jan	Bezděk, Jan (2020): Revision of Agelopsis (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Galerucinae). Zootaxa 4731 (2): 223-248, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4731.2.3
E02A6172B607207CFF41FBDCFDFAFE46.text	E02A6172B607207CFF41FBDCFDFAFE46.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Agelopsis caeruleus Jacoby 1896	<div><p>Agelopsis caeruleus Jacoby, 1896</p><p>(Figs 5–6, 12, 21, 35–37, 48, 55, 62)</p><p>Agelopsis caeruleus Jacoby, 1896: 301 (original description); Maulik 1936: 467; Wilcox 1973: 469 (catalogue); Takizawa 1988: 538 (faunistics); Takizawa 1990: 282 (faunistics); Medvedev &amp; Sprecher 1999: 299 (catalogue); Kimoto 2001: 33 (faunis- ics); Kimoto 2005: 43 (catalogue); Beenen 2010: 469 (catalogue); Sprecher-Uebersax 2011: 420 (catalogue).</p><p>Type locality. “Bengal (Konbir)”.</p><p>Type examined. Holotype: ♀ (BMNH), “Type / H. T. [round white label with red collar, p] // Konbir / P. Cardon [y, p] // Jacoby Coll. / 1909–28 a. [w, p] // Bengal [w, h] // Agelopsis / caeruleus / Type. Jac. [b, h]”.</p><p>Additional material examined. 4 specimens — INDIA: West Bengal: 1 ♂, Darjeeling, Lopchu, 22.ix.1929, J. C. M. Gardner leg. (BMNH) ; Mungphu, without additional data , 1 ♀ (BMNH) . NEPAL: 1 ♂, Parbat distr., Ban- thanti-Baichi Kharka, 2300-2600 m, 17.x.1981, M. Tomokuni leg. (HTCH) ; 1 ♂, Annapurna reg., Tikhedunga env., 1500 m, 7.x.1992, A. Weigel leg. (NMEG) .</p><p>Redescription. Measurements. Males: 4.9–5.6 mm, females: 5.4–5.5 mm (holotype 5.4 mm). Dorsal side glabrous, elongate, subparallel. Dorsal side metallic blue, legs, antennae and ventral side black with metallic tint, apices of mandibles orange.</p><p>Male (Fig. 12). Labrum transverse, with shallowly concave anterior margin and rounded anterior angles, surface slightly convex, with transverse line of pores bearing long seta. Anterior part of head with straight anterior margin, surface with transverse triangular elevated keel, posteriorly produced to short process forming nasal keel, surface lustrous, covered with very fine microsulpture, antennal impressions with several long setae. Interantennal space as wide as transverse diameter of antennal socket. Eyes small. Interocular space wide, 3.88 time as wide as transverse diameter of eye. Frontal tubercles transversely subtriangular, elevated, lustrous, separated by thin furrow. Vertex separated from frontal tubercles by straight deep impressed line, surface impunctate, glabrous. Antennae slender, 0.89 times as long body, length ratio of antennomeres equals 9-4-8-12-11-11-10-12-12-12-15.</p><p>Pronotum subquadratic, 1.11 times as wide as long, lustrous, glabrous, widest at apical fifth, almost impunc- tate. Surface moderately convex in anterior half and with distinct transverse impression at posterior third nearly interrupted in middle. Anterior margin nearly straight, lateral margins slightly rounded in apical half and parallel in basal half, posterior margin nearly straight, slightly oblique in lateral parts. Anterior margin unbordered, lateral and posterior margins with narrow border. Anterior angles swollen, moderately pronounced, posterior angles rectangular, pointed, all angles with setigerous pores bearing long pale seta. Scutellum short and wide, with widely rounded apex, impunctate, lustrous, glabrous.</p><p>Elytra 1.60 times as long as wide (measured at humeral calli) and 0.66 times as long as body, subparallel, widest in middle. Surface covered with small dense confused punctures. Humeral calli well developed. Epipleura wider in basal third, then gradually narrowing towards apex. Macropterous.</p><p>Abdomen (Figs 35–37): last abdominal ventrite with two short V-shaped incisions, median lobe with conver- gent lateral margins, surface with indistinct median impression. Abdominal ventrite IV with posterior margin pro- nounced down forming short finger-like procession.</p><p>Metatrochanter not modified. Tarsi: protarsomere I elongate subtriangular, II triangular, I wider than II, length ratio of protarsomeres equals 7-6-4-10, metatarsomere I narrowly subtriangular, length ratio of metatarsomeres equals 10-6-4-10.</p><p>Aedeagus (Fig. 21) lanceolate, with triangular apex, apical third flat and slightly bent upwards. Apical part of ventral side with large elongate impression.</p><p>Female (holotype, Fig. 5). Spermatheca with elongate, slightly bent nodulus, cornu C-shaped (Fig. 48). Gonocoxae as in Fig. 62. Sternite VIII elongate, tignum thin, twice longer than sternite VIII (Fig. 55).</p><p>Distribution. India: Jharkhand (Jacoby 1896), West Bengal (present study); Nepal (Takizawa 1988, 1990; Ki- moto 2001; present study).</p><p>Differential diagnosis. In habitus, Agelopsis caeruleus is very similar to A. tibetanus . Both species share subquadrate pronotum (1.11 times as wide as long in A. caeruleus, 1.25 times as wide as long in A. tibetanus) with almost impunctate surface. Abdominal ventrite IV in males of A. caeruleus has posterior margin pronounced to short finger-like procession (without such procession in A. tibetanus). Elytra in A. tibetanus have blunt (males) or sharp (females) keel behind humerus while elytra are without keel in A. caeruleus . Both species differs also in the structure of aedeagus (Figs 21, 24).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/E02A6172B607207CFF41FBDCFDFAFE46	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Bezděk, Jan	Bezděk, Jan (2020): Revision of Agelopsis (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Galerucinae). Zootaxa 4731 (2): 223-248, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4731.2.3
E02A6172B609207DFF41FDF1FD14FE46.text	E02A6172B609207DFF41FDF1FD14FE46.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Agelopsis metallicus (Bryant 1954) Bezděk 2020	<div><p>Agelopsis metallicus (Bryant, 1954), comb. nov.</p><p>(Figs 13, 22, 28, 39, 49, 56, 63)</p><p>Bijukta metallica Bryant, 1954: 415 (original description); Wilcox 1973: 453 (catalogue).</p><p>Type locality. “N. E. Burma, Kambaiti ” .</p><p>Types examined. Holotype: ♂ (NHRS), “N. E. BURMA / Kambaiti 2000m / R. Malaise 28/5 1934 [w, p] // Type [white round label with red collar, p] // Bijukta / metallica / Type Bry [h] / G. E. Bryant det. [w, p]” . Paratypes: 1 ♂ (NHRS), “N. E. BURMA / Kambaiti, 2000 m / 12-17/6.34 Malaise [w, p] // Paratypus [r, p] // Bijukta / metal- lica / Paratype Bry [h] / G. E. Bryant det. [w, p] // NHRS-JLKB / 000023031 [w, p]” ; 1 ♀ (NHRS), “N. E. BURMA / Kambaiti, 2000 m / 1/6.1934 Malaise [w, p] // Bijukta / metallica / Paratype Bry [h] / G. E. Bryant det. [w, p] // NHRS-JLKB / 000023030 [w, p]” .</p><p>Redescription. Measurements. Males: 7.0– 7.9 mm, female: 8.3 mm. Dorsal side glabrous, elongate, divergent posteriorly. Whole body metallic green, anterolateral parts of head brownish, legs metallic green (less intensive than body) with brownish knees, antennomeres I-III metallic, rest of antennomeres black, extreme bases of antennomeres brownish.</p><p>Male (paratype, Fig. 13). Labrum transverse, with shallowly concave anterior margin, lateral margins convergent, and rounded anterior angles, surface slightly convex, with transverse line of pores bearing long seta. Anterior part of head with straight anterior margin, surface with transverse triangular elevated keel, posteriorly produced to process forming nasal keel, surface lustrous, impunctate, antennal impressions with several long setae. Interantennal space 0.80 times as wide as transverse diameter of antennal socket. Eyes small. Interocular space wide, 3.83 time as wide as transverse diameter of eye. Frontal tubercles subtriangular, elevated, lustrous, separated by thin furrow. Vertex separated from frontal tubercles by almost straight furrow, surface impunctate, glabrous, with single pore bearing long seta behind each eye. Antennae slender, 0.87 times as long body, length ratio of antennomeres equals 11-5-10-15-16-15-15-14-14-14-18.</p><p>Pronotum transverse, 1.54 times as wide as long, lustrous, glabrous, widest at apical third, covered with very fine punctures. Surface moderately convex in anterior half and with distinct transverse impression at posterior third nearly interrupted in middle. Anterior margin nearly straight, lateral margins rounded in apical half, straight and convergent in basal half, posterior margin nearly straight, slightly oblique in lateral parts. Anterior and posterior margins thinly bordered, lateral margins with wider border. Anterior angles swollen, moderately pronounced, posterior angles obtuse, pointed, all angles with setigerous pores bearing long pale seta. Scutellum subtriangular, with widely rounded apex, impunctate, lustrous, glabrous.</p><p>Elytra 1.56 times as long as wide (measured at humeral calli) and 0.64 times as long as body, divergent posteriorly, widest at posterior third. Surface covered with small dense confused punctures. Humeral calli well developed. Epipleura relatively narrow, gradually narrowing towards apex. Macropterous.</p><p>Abdomen: last abdominal ventrite with two short V-shaped incisions and surface with thin transverse impressed line, median lobe with parallel lateral margins (Fig. 39).</p><p>Metatrochanter enlarged forming large sharp tooth (Fig. 28). Tarsi: protarsomere I subtriangular, II triangular, I slightly wider than II, length ratio of protarsomeres equals 10-10-5-12, metatarsomere I narrowly subtriangular, length ratio of metatarsomeres equals 12-10-5-14.</p><p>Aedeagus (Fig. 22) constricted at apical third, apex triangular, apical part flattened. In lateral view, aedeagus widely curved. Ventral side with long narrow impression in apical half.</p><p>Female. Metatrochanters not modified. Spermatheca with sphaerical nodulus, cornu C-shaped (Fig. 49). Gonocoxae with basal apodemes short, robust, caudal fin-shaped (Fig. 63). Sternite VIII spade-shaped, tignum thin, 1.7 times as long as sternite VIII (Fig. 56).</p><p>Distribution. Myanmar.</p><p>Differential diagnosis. With the body lenght 7.0– 8.3 mm Agelopsis metallicus is the largest Agelopsis species and together with A. spinipes and A. traxlerorum sp. nov. it belongs to the group with modified male metatrochanters. The males of A. metallicus have modified metatrochanters forming wide and curved tooth directed posteriorly (Fig. 28) while metatrochanters are wedge-shaped without distinct tooth in A. traxlerorum sp. nov. (Fig. 31) or narrower with tooth directed obliquely and not curved in A. spinipes (Fig. 29). All three species can be disntinguished also by the structure of aedeagus (Figs 22, 23, 27).</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/E02A6172B609207DFF41FDF1FD14FE46	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Bezděk, Jan	Bezděk, Jan (2020): Revision of Agelopsis (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Galerucinae). Zootaxa 4731 (2): 223-248, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4731.2.3
E02A6172B608207EFF41FDF1FB14FCEE.text	E02A6172B608207EFF41FDF1FB14FCEE.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Agelopsis spinipes (Ogloblin 1936) Bezděk 2020	<div><p>Agelopsis spinipes (Ogloblin, 1936), comb. nov.</p><p>(Figs 7–8, 14, 23, 29–30, 40, 50, 57, 64)</p><p>Liroetis spinipes Ogloblin, 1936: 212, 406 (original description); Gressitt &amp; Kimoto 1963: 535; Wilcox 1973: 476 (catalogue); Jiang 1988: 185; Lopatin 2004: 620 (drawing of aedeagus); Beenen 2010: 478 (catalogue); Mohamedsaid 2010: 260 (stridulation).</p><p>Type locality. “Se-Tchouen: Da-Tsian-Lou”.</p><p>Type. Holotype: ♂ (ZIN), “[blank small golden round label] // Да-ЦЗЯнь-лу / I-VII-93 / Потанин [= Da-Tsien- Lou (= Kangding), Potanin leg.] [w, h] // Liroëtis ♂ / spinipes sp. n. / 1934 [h] D. Ogloblin det. [w, p] // [blank, w, p]”.</p><p>Additional material examined. 21 specimens — CHINA: Sichuan: 1 ♂ 1 ♀, Omei Mt., 4500 ft, 10.- 22.viii.1936, D. C. Graham leg. (USNM) ; 4 ♂♂ 1 ♀, Emeishan, <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=103.33111&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=29.540277" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 103.33111/lat 29.540277)">Leidongping</a>, 29°32´25´´N 103°19´52´´E, 2420 m, 8.-9.vi.2014, J. Hájek &amp; J. Růžička leg. (NMPC) ; 2 ♂♂ 2 ♀♀, Emei Mt., 1000-2000 m, 6.vi.1997, M. Ouda leg. (MOCP) ; 1 ♂, Emei Shan, Recept. point env., ca. 2500 m, 19.vi.1996, D. Erber leg. (RBCN) ; 1 ♀, Emei Mt., 180 km S of Chengdu, 1800-2400 m, 4.-6.vii.1993, Z. Jindra &amp; M. Trýzna leg. (UACB) ; 2 ♂♂ 2 ♀♀, Emei Shan, vi.1992, without additional data (UACB, 1 ♂ RBCN) ; 1 ♀, Emei Shan, 4.vi.1992, Sauer leg. (UACB) . Gansu: 1 ♂ 2 ♀♀, Lazikou valley, 34°09.9-10´N 103°48.2-51.9´E, 28.vi.2005, J. Hájek, D. Král &amp; J. Růžička leg. (JBCB) .</p><p>Redescription. Measurements. Males: 5.4–5.9 mm (holotype 5.4 mm), females: 5.9–6.9 mm. Dorsal side glabrous, elongate, subparallel, slightly divergent posteriorly. Body metallic violet or green, legs and antennae black with distinct metallic tint, basal antennomeres brownish.</p><p>Male (Fig. 14, holotype in Fig. 7). Labrum transverse, with shallowly concave anterior margin, lateral margins convergent, and rounded anterior angles, surface slightly convex, with two groups of pores placed laterally bearing long seta. Anterior part of head with straight anterior margin, surface with transverse, slightly concave, elevated keel, posteriorly produced to short process forming nasal keel, surface lustrous, with several long setae along anterior margin and some shorter setae along anterior margin of antennal impressions. Interantennal space as wide as transverse diameter of antennal socket. Eyes small. Interocular space wide, 3.33 time as wide as transverse diameter of eye. Frontal tubercles subtriangular, elevated, lustrous, separated by thin furrow. Vertex separated from frontal tu- bercles by sinuate punctate furrow, surface impunctate, glabrous. Antennae slender, 0.87 times as long body, length ratio of antennomeres equals 7-4-8-10-10-10-10-10-10-9-12.</p><p>Pronotum transverse, 1.41 times as wide as long, lustrous, glabrous, widest at apical third, covered with fine punctures. Surface moderately convex in anterior half and with distinct transverse impression at posterior third, shallower and wider in middle part. Anterior margin widely concave, lateral margins rounded in apical half, straight and convergent in basal half, posterior margin nearly straight, in middle with shallow emargination, slightly oblique in lateral parts. Anterior margin indistinctly bordered, lateral margins with wider border, posterior margin thinly bordered in middle part, gradually wider laterally. Anterior angles triangularly pronounced, posterior angles obtuse, pointed, all angles with setigerous pores bearing long pale seta. Scutellum subtriangular, with widely rounded apex, lustrous, glabrous, covered with fine microsculpture.</p><p>Elytra 1.69 times as long as wide (measured at humeral calli) and 0.72 times as long as body, slightly divergent posteriorly, widest at posterior third. Surface covered with small dense confused punctures. Humeral calli well developed. Epipleura relatively narrow, gradually narrowing towards apex. Macropterous.</p><p>Abdomen: last abdominal ventrite with two shallow U-shaped incisions, median lobe short with rounded posterior margin, median lobe shallowly impressed (Fig. 40).</p><p>Metatrochanter enlarged, pronounced to distinct tooth (Fig. 29). Tarsi: protarsomere I elongate subtriangular, II triangular, I as wide as II, length ratio of protarsomeres equals 8-5-4-7, metatarsomere I narrowly subtriangular, length ratio of metatarsomeres equals 10-7-4-9.</p><p>Aedeagus (Fig. 23) almost parallel, very slightly and widely constricted before middle, apex subtriangular with margins slightly rounded. In lateral view, aedeagus widely curved. Ventral side with shallow subapical impression.</p><p>Female. Metatrochanters not modified. Spermatheca with slightly elongate nodulus, cornu C-shaped (Fig. 50). Gonocoxae as in Fig. 64. Sternite VIII spade-shaped, with straigth posterior margin with small shallow emargina- tion in middle, tignum thin, 1.8 times as long as sternite VIII (Fig. 57).</p><p>Variability. The male from Gansu has slightly wider subapical part of aedeagus and slightly shorter tooth of metatrochanter (Fig. 30).</p><p>Distribution. China: Sichuan (Ogloblin 1936, present study), Gansu (present study).</p><p>Differential diagnosis. Agelopsis spinipes belongs to the group with modified male metatrochanters (together with A. metallicus and A. traxlerorum sp. nov.). Male metatrochanters of A. spinipes are narrow with tooth directed obliquely (Figs 29–30) while the male of A. metallicus has wide metatrochanters with curved tooth directed posteriorly (Fig. 28) and male of A. traxlerorum sp. nov. has metatrochanters wedge-shaped without distinct tooth (Fig. 31). All three species can be disntinguished also by the structure of aedeagus (Figs 22, 23, 27).</p><p>In habitus Agelopsis spinipes is similar to A. tibetanus but males of A. tibetanus have no modified metatrochanters. Moreover, elytra of A. spinipes are not keeled behind humerus while keeled in A. tibetanus .</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/E02A6172B608207EFF41FDF1FB14FCEE	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Bezděk, Jan	Bezděk, Jan (2020): Revision of Agelopsis (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Galerucinae). Zootaxa 4731 (2): 223-248, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4731.2.3
E02A6172B60B2079FF41FC08FB1BFC7A.text	E02A6172B60B2079FF41FC08FB1BFC7A.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Agelopsis tibetanus (Chen 1976) Bezděk 2020	<div><p>Agelopsis tibetanus (Chen, 1976), comb. nov.</p><p>(Figs 9–10, 15, 24, 41, 51, 58, 65)</p><p>Zizonia tibetana Chen in Chen et al., 1976: 220 (original description); Chen &amp; Jiang 1981: 480 (faunistics); Chen &amp; Jiang 1987: 53 (faunisics); Beenen 2010: 490 (catalogue).</p><p>Type locality. “ Tibet: Chayu ” .</p><p>Type material examined. Holotype (photograph only): ♀ (IZAS), “[in Chinese] 2600 [w, combination h and p] // 1973.VI.25. [h] / [in Chinese, w, p] // HOLOTYPE [r, p] // Zizonia / tibetana [w, h] / [in Chinese, p] n. sp. [w, h]”.</p><p>Additional material examined. 2 specimens — CHINA: Xizang: 1 ♂ 1 ♀, Zayü County, Ata Kang, 9000 ft., 14.vi.1933, F. Kingdon Ward &amp; R. J. H. Kaulback leg. (BMNH) .</p><p>Redescription. Measurements. Male: 6.5 mm, females: 5.3–5.7 mm (holotype 5.3 mm). Dorsal side glabrous, elongate oval, slightly widened posteriorly. Dorsal side metallic violet, legs, antennae and ventral side black with metallic tint, knees, tarsi, basal antennomeres, mandibles and anterolateral parts of head usually brownish.</p><p>Male (Fig. 15). Labrum transverse, with straight anterior margin and rounded anterior angles, surface convex, with transverse line of six pores bearing long seta. Clypeus with straight anterior margin. Anterior part of head with transverse, shallowly concave, elevated keel, posteriorly produced to short process forming nasal keel, surface lustrous, with long setae along antennal impressions and below eyes. Interantennal space as wide as transverse diameter of antennal socket. Eyes small. Interocular space wide, 3.55 time as wide as transverse diameter of eye. Frontal tubercles subtriangular, elevated, lustrous, separated by thin furrow. Vertex separated from frontal tubercles by straight deep furrow, surface impunctate, glabrous. Antennae slender, 0.89 times as long body, length ratio of antennomeres equals 9-4-7-10-10-10-10-10-9-8-10.</p><p>Pronotum subquadratic, 1.25 times as wide as long, lustrous, glabrous, widest at apical third, almost impunctate. Surface moderately convex in anterior half and with distinct transverse impression at posterior third nearly interrupted in middle. Anterior margin nearly straight, lateral margins moderately rounded in apical half, straight and slightly convergent in basal half, posterior margin nearly straight in middle part, slightly oblique in lateral parts. Anterior and posterior margins thinly bordered, lateral margins with wider border. Anterior angles swollen, moderately pronounced, posterior angles nearly rectangular, all angles with setigerous pores bearing long pale seta. Scutellum subtriangular with widely rounded apex, impunctate, lustrous, glabrous.</p><p>Elytra 1.90 times as long as wide (measured at humeral calli) and 0.67 times as long as body, slightly widened posteriorly, widest at posterior third. Surface covered with small dense confused punctures. Humeral calli well developed, with blunt costa parallel with lateral margin disappearing at 2/3 of elytral length. Epipleura relatively narrow, then gradually narrowing towards apex. Macropterous.</p><p>Abdomen: last abdominal ventrite with two shallow wide incisions, middle part of ventrite shallowly impressed (Fig. 41).</p><p>Metatrochanter not modified. Tarsi: protarsomere I elongate subtriangular, II triangular, I slightly wider than II, length ratio of protarsomeres equals 7-5-4-9, metatarsomere I narrowly triangular, length ratio of metatarsomeres equals 9-6-4-10.</p><p>Aedeagus (Fig. 24) parallel, with triangular apex, apical third gradually flattened. In lateral view, apical third straight, basal two third curved.</p><p>Female (holotype, Fig. 9). Pronotum more transverse, 1.36 times as wide as long. Elytra behind humerus with sharp costa parallel with lateral margin. Spermatheca with sphaerical nodulus, cornu C-shaped (Fig. 51). Gonocoxae as in Fig. 65. Sternite VIII spade-shaped, tignum thin with slightly wider and bent apex, 1.5 times as long as sternite VIII (Fig. 58).</p><p>Distribution. China: Xizang (Chen et al. 1976; Chen &amp; Jiang 1981, 1987; present study).</p><p>Differential diagnosis. Agelopsis tibetanus shares not modified trochanters, not modified abdominal ventrites and presence of blunt keel behind humerus with A. aeneoviridis . The males of both species differ in the structure of pronotum (1.25 times as wide as long and with surface smooth in A. tibetanus while 1.35 times as wide as long and with surface punctured in A. aeneoviridis) and aedeagus (aedeagus of A. tibetanus is parallel and in lateral view without angulation while aedeagus of A. aeneoviridis is subapically extended and in lateral view with distinct angulation at apical third, cf. Figs 19, 24). In habitus Agelopsis tibetanus is similar to A. spinipes but males of A. spinipes have modified metatrochanters. Moreover, elytra of A. spinipes are not keeled behind humerus.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/E02A6172B60B2079FF41FC08FB1BFC7A	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Bezděk, Jan	Bezděk, Jan (2020): Revision of Agelopsis (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Galerucinae). Zootaxa 4731 (2): 223-248, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4731.2.3
E02A6172B60C207AFF41FBDCFDECFBCE.text	E02A6172B60C207AFF41FBDCFDECFBCE.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Agelopsis konstantinovi Bezdek 2020	<div><p>Agelopsis konstantinovi Bezděk, sp. nov.</p><p>(Figs 16, 25, 42, 44, 52, 59, 66)</p><p>urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: CD059F90-415D-4B14-A779-380394DD940E</p><p>Type locality. China, Shaanxi, Qin Ling mts., <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=108.890114&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=33.7916" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 108.890114/lat 33.7916)">An Kang</a>, 33°47.496′N 108°53.407′E .</p><p>Types. Holotype: ♂ (USNM), “ China: Shaanxi Prov, Qin / <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=108.890114&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=33.7916" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 108.890114/lat 33.7916)">Ling mts.</a> An Kang WP-393 / N33°47.496 E108°53.407 / 12.VI.2013 h= 1430 m / leg. A. Konstantinov [w, p]” . Paratypes: 2 ♂♂ 3 ♀♀ (USNM), same data as holotype; 1 ♂ (OKCZ), “ China, N Sichuan, Xiao-Zhaizi Nat. / Nature Reserve, 7 km W of / <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=103.93917&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=32.02361" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 103.93917/lat 32.02361)">Qingpianxiang</a>, Xiao- zhaizi / 32°1´25´´N 103°56´21´´E / 27.VI.-1.VII.2017, 1560-1700 / lgt. Ondřej Konvička [w, p]”. The holotype is provided with one additional printed red label: “ HOLOTYPUS [or PARATYPUS], / Agelopsis / konstantinovi sp. nov., / J. Bezděk det., 2019” .</p><p>Description. Measurements. Males: 3.5-4.4 mm (holotype 4.4 mm), females: 4.2-4.6 mm. Dorsal side elongate oval, convex, glabrous. Dorsal side metallic blue with oil tint, antennae and legs black with slight metallic tint, ventral side black, lustrous, middle part of last abdominal ventrite brown.</p><p>Male (holotype, Fig. 16). Labrum transverse, with emarginated anterior margin and rounded anterior angles, surface with several pores bearing long seta, slightly convex. Anterior part of head with straight anterior margin, surface with transverse, concave, elevated keel, posteriorly produced to short process forming elevated nasal keel, subantennal impressions with several long setae. Interantennal space as wide as transverse diameter of antennal socket. Interocular space wide, 2.9 time as wide as transverse diameter of eye. Frontal tubercles transverse, subtrapezoidal, elevated, smooth, lustrous, lateral parts covered with indistinct wrinkles, separated by thin furrow. Vertex separated from frontal tubercles by deep impressed, almost straigth line, surface impunctate, glabrous. Antennae slender, 0.80 times as long body, length ratio of antennomeres equals 7-4-6-8-8-7-7-7-7-7-10.</p><p>Pronotum transverse, 1.42 times as wide as long, lustrous, glabrous, widest in anterior quarter, covered with very fine punctures. Surface strongly convex in anterior half, with transverse impression at posterior third. Anterior margin widely shallowly concave, lateral margins rounded at anterior half, convergent posteriorly, sinuate before posterior angles, posterior margin sinuate in middle, laterally slightly oblique. Anterior margin unbordered, lateral margins with narrow border in anterior half and wider punctured and microsculptired border in posterior half, posterior margin with narrow border in middle, wider laterally.Anterior angles distinctly swollen, oblique and transverse, posterior angles nearly rectangular, all angles with setigerous pores bearing long pale seta. Scutellum short and wide, subtriangular, with very widely rounded apex, impunctate, glabrous.</p><p>Elytra 1.35 times as long as wide (measured at humeral calli) and 0.52 times as long as body, oval, widest in middle. Surface densely covered with small confused punctures. Humeral calli developed. Epipleura relatively narrow, smooth, glabrous, lustrous, gradually narrowed towards elytral apex. Hind wings vestigial.</p><p>Abdomen (Figs 42, 44): abdominal ventrite III widely rounded, narrow, gradually constricted in middle part, centrally with small transverse vertical impression, IV widely rounded, with flat horizontal impression in middle, posteriorly surrounded by sharp keel. Last abdominal ventrite enlarged, with two oblique V-shaped incisions, me- dian lobe with sinuate lateral margins, middle part surface with distinct chanelled impression.</p><p>Metatrochanter not modified. Metatibia emarginated at inner apical margin. Tarsi: protarsomere I elongate, subparallel in anterior two thirds, II triangular, I slightly wider than II, length ratio of protarsomeres equals 10-8-6-13, mesotarsomere I slightly asymmetrical with outer margin slightly concave, length ratio of mesotarsomeres equals 13-9-6-9; metatarsomere I asymmetrical with inner margin emarginated basally, length ratio of metatarsomeres equals 19-10-6-15.</p><p>Aedeagus (Fig. 25) flat, with transversely cut and shallowly concave apex, apical third slightly convergent, middle part parallel. In lateral view, aedeagus bent in apical third, basal two thirds straight.</p><p>Female. Spermatheca with sphaerical nodulus, cornu C-shaped (Fig. 52). Gonocoxae as in Fig. 66. Sternite VIII subquadrangular, tignum thin, 2.2 times longer than sternite VIII (Fig. 59).</p><p>Differential diagnosis. With body length 3.5-4.6 mm A. konstantinovi sp. nov. is the smallest Agelopsis species, and also it is only species with vestigial hind wings and transversely cut apex of aedeagus (Fig. 25). The males have strongly modified abdomen (Figs 42, 44) as follows: abdominal ventrites III and IV are widely curved, medi- ally constricted and in middle with impressed posterior margins. Last abdominal ventrite have channeled median lobe and lateral view is widely concave.</p><p>Distribution. China: Shaanxi, Sichuan.</p><p>Etymology. Dedicated to my friend Alexander S. Konstantinov (USNM), a specialist in Alticini, who collected most specimens from the type series.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/E02A6172B60C207AFF41FBDCFDECFBCE	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Bezděk, Jan	Bezděk, Jan (2020): Revision of Agelopsis (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Galerucinae). Zootaxa 4731 (2): 223-248, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4731.2.3
E02A6172B60F2065FF41FB68FA85FD7E.text	E02A6172B60F2065FF41FB68FA85FD7E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Agelopsis malaisei Bezdek 2020	<div><p>Agelopsis malaisei Bezděk, sp. nov.</p><p>(Figs 17, 26, 43, 45, 53, 60, 67)</p><p>urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: 0A05E159-F6E6-47A5-89DD-022ECD6C2893</p><p>Type locality. Myanmar, Kambaiti .</p><p>Types. Holotype: ♂ (NHRS), “N. E. BURMA / Kambaiti 2000m / R. Malaise 26/5 1934 [w, p] // NHRS-JLKB / 000023059 [w, p]” . Paratypes: 1 ♂ (NHRS), “N. E. BURMA / Kambaiti 2000m / R. Malaise 26/5 1934 [w, p] // NHRS-JLKB / 000023060 [w, p]” ; 1 ♂ (NHRS), “N. E. BURMA / Kambaiti 2000m / R. Malaise 1/6 1934 [w, p] // NHRS-JLKB / 000023061 [w, p]” ; 1 ♀ (NHRS), “N. E. BURMA / Kambaiti 2000m / R. Malaise 1/6 1934 [w, p] // NHRS-JLKB / 000023062 [w, p]” ; 1 ♀ (NHRS), “N. E. BURMA / Kambaiti 2000m / R. Malaise 26/5 1934 [w, p] // NHRS-JLKB / 000023063 [w, p]” ; 1 ♀ (NHRS), “N. E. BURMA / Kambaiti 2000 m / R. Malaise 18/5 1934 [w, p] // NHRS-JLKB / 000023064 [w, p]” ; 1 ♂ (BMNH), “N. E. BURMA / Kambaiti 7000 ft. [p] / 11/5 1934 [h] / R. MALAISE [w, p] // N. E. BURMA: / R. Malaise. / B. M. 1939-101. [w, p]” ; 2 ♀♀ (BMNH), “N. E. BURMA / Kambaiti 7000 ft. [p] / 13/5 1934 [h] / R. MALAISE [w, p] // N. E. BURMA: / R. Malaise. / B. M. 1939-101. [w, p]” ; 1 ♀ (BMNH), “N. E. BURMA / Kambaiti 7000 ft. [p] / 28/5 1934 [h] / R. MALAISE [w, p] // N. E. BURMA: / R. Malaise. / B. M. 1939-101. [w, p]” ; 1 ♀ (BMNH), “N. E. BURMA / Kambaiti, 2000 m / 14/5 1934 Malaise [w, p] // N. E. BURMA: / R. Malaise. / B. M. 1939-101. [w, p]” ; 1 ♂ (MLCN), “ MYANMAR (Burma) / Provinz Kachin State / ca. 20 km N von Panwar / 24.V.2006 / leg. Michael Langer [w, p] // Tagfang/ 2.180 m / N 25° 43´302´´ / E 098° 23´353´´ [w, p] // coll. / M. Langer [pink, p]” ; 1 ♀ (MLCN), “ MYANMAR (Burma) / Provinz Kachin State / Camp im Wald, Strasse von / Kanphant zum Mt. Emaw Bum / 26.V.2006 / leg. Michael Langer [w, p] // Tag- fang/ 2.440 m / N 26° 09´388´´ E 098° / 30´535´´ [w, p] // coll. / M. Langer [pink, p]” ; 1 ♀ (RBCN), “ MYANMAR (Burma) / Provinz Kachin State / Camp im Wald, Strasse von / Kanphant zum Mt. Emaw Bum / 25.V.2006 / leg. Michael Langer [w, p] // Tagfang/ 2.440 m / N 26° 09´388´´ / E 098° 30´535´´ [w, p] // coll. / M. Langer [pink, p]” ;</p><p>1 ♂ (RBCN), “ CHINA Yunnan / Gaol Igong-shan / Mt. Res, 20 vi 1993 / Lgt. SAUSA”. The type specimens are provided with one additional printed red label: “ HOLOTYPUS [or PARATYPUS], / Agelopsis / malaisei sp. nov., / J. Bezděk det., 2019” .</p><p>Description. Measurements. Males: 5.4-6.3 mm (holotype 6.3 mm), females: 6.0-7.0 mm. Dorsal side elongate oval, convex, glabrous. Body, legs and basal antennomeres metallic violet, dorsal side with oil tint, rest of antennomeres black, posterior half of last abdominal ventrite brown.</p><p>Male (holotype, Fig. 17). Labrum transverse, with emarginated anterior margin and rounded anterior angles, surface with six pores in transverse row bearing long seta, slightly convex. Clypeus with straight anterior corner. Anterior part of head with well developed transverse, concave, elevated keel, posteriorly produced to short process forming elevated nasal keel. Subantennal impressions with several long setae. Interantennal space as wide as transverse diameter of antennal socket. Interocular space wide, 3.4 time as wide as transverse diameter of eye. Frontal tubercles large, triangular, elevated, covered with fine microsculpture, separated by thin furrow. Vertex separated from frontal tubercles by deep straigth line, surface impunctate, glabrous. Antennae slender, 0.88 times as long body, length ratio of antennomeres equals 9-4-7-13-13-12-12-12-12-11-15.</p><p>Pronotum transverse, 1.45 times as wide as long, lustrous, glabrous, widest in anterior third, covered with very fine punctures. Surface convex in anterior half, with transverse impression at posterior third. Anterior margin almost straight, lateral margins slightly rounded at anterior half, convergent and straight posteriorly, posterior margin straight in middle, laterally slightly oblique. Anterior margin with very fine indistinct border, lateral and posterior margins thinly bordered. Anterior angles moderately swollen, oblique, posterior angles nearly rectangular, all angles with setigerous pores bearing long pale seta. Scutellum short and wide, with very widely rounded apex, impunctate, glabrous.</p><p>Elytra 1.61 times as long as wide (measured at humeral calli) and 0.66 times as long as body, oval, widest at posterior third. Surface densely covered with small confused punctures. Humeral calli developed. Epipleura relatively narrow, smooth, glabrous, lustrous, gradually narrowed towards elytral apex. Macropterous.</p><p>Last abdominal ventrite (Figs 43, 45) enlarged, subtrapezoidal, median lobe with posterior margin straight, lateral parts of ventrite with large semicircular emarginations, surface of median lobe with chanelled impression slightly wider posteriorly. In lateral view, last abdominal ventrite distinctly concave in middle.</p><p>Metatrochanter not modified. Metatibia with slightly impressed and glabrous inner apical surface and apically emarginated. Tarsi: protarsomere I elongate, slightly asymmetrical with more rounded outer margin, II triangular, I slightly wider than II, length ratio of protarsomeres equals 7-6-4-9, mesotarsomere I elongate, narrow, parallel, length ratio of mesotarsomeres equals 8-6-4-10; metatarsomere I elongate triangular, length ratio of metatarsomeres equals 11-7-4-10.</p><p>Aedeagus (Fig. 26) flat, with apical third triangular, middle part wide and subparallel. Dorsal surface with two long parallel carinae medially and two shorter oblique carinae laterally. In lateral view, aedeagus strongly curved in apical half.</p><p>Female. Metatibia not modified. Pygidium with small apical incision. Spermatheca with elongate nodulus, cornu C-shaped (Fig. 53). Gonocoxae as in Fig. 67. Sternite VIII drop-shaped with widely rounded apical margin, tignum thin with slightly wider middle part, 1.8 times longer than sternite VIII (Fig. 60).</p><p>Differential diagnosis. Having not modified male metatrochanters and enlarged last abdominal ventrite with channeled median lobe, Agelopsis malaisei sp. nov. is similar to A. belousovi and A. konstantinovi sp. nov. The aedeagus of A. malaisei sp. nov. has strongly curved apical part and carinate dorsal surface (Fig. 26) while aedeagus is lanceolate with pointed tip, ventrally with two wing-like lamellae in A. belousovi (Fig. 20) and aedeagus is transversely cut in A. konstantinovi sp. nov. (Fig. 25). Males of Agelopsis malaisei sp. nov. have abdominal ventrite IV not modified and last abdominal ventrite relatively flat and in lateral view ditinctly concave (Figs 43, 45). Similar structure of abdomen can be found in males of A. belousovi but abdominal ventrite IV has two small flat lamellae in middle and last abdominal ventrite is raised (Fig. 32–34).</p><p>Distribution. Myanmar.</p><p>Etymology. Dedicated to René Edmond Malaise, a Swedish entomologist, who collected the type series.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/E02A6172B60F2065FF41FB68FA85FD7E	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Bezděk, Jan	Bezděk, Jan (2020): Revision of Agelopsis (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Galerucinae). Zootaxa 4731 (2): 223-248, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4731.2.3
E02A6172B6102063FF41F886FE16FCA6.text	E02A6172B6102063FF41F886FE16FCA6.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Agelopsis traxlerorum Bezdek 2020	<div><p>Agelopsis traxlerorum Bezděk, sp. nov.</p><p>(Figs 18, 27, 31, 46)</p><p>urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act: FA29F476-4154-468A-AE7E-4656B69B54D9</p><p>Type locality. China, Yunnan, Daju, 50 km N of Lijiang.</p><p>Type. Holotype: ♂ (NMPC), “China-Yunnan / Daju (50 km N of / Lijiang) Jendek lgt. [w, h]”. The holotype is provided with one additional printed red label: “ HOLOTYPUS, / Agelopsis / traxlerorum sp. nov., / J. Bezděk det., 2019”.</p><p>Description. Measurements. Male: 7.1 mm (holotype). Dorsal side elongate oval, moderately convex, glabrous. Head and pronotum metallic bluish-black, scutellum black, elytra metallic dark greenish-purpureous, ventral side, several basal antennomeres and legs black with slight metallic tint.</p><p>Male (holotype, Fig. 46). Labrum transverse, with straight anterior margin and rounded anterior angles, with two groups of four pores lateraly bearing long seta. Anterior part of head with straight anterior margin, surface with transverse elevated keel sinuate in middle, posteriorly produced to short proces forming nasal keel, covered with several punctures bearing seta. Interantennal space as wide as transverse diameter of antennal socket. Interocular space wide, 3.42 time as wide as transverse diameter of eye. Frontal tubercles transverse trapezoidal, elevated, smooth, lustours, separated by thin furrow. Vertex separated from frontal tubercles by deep impressed line, surface impunctate, covered with very fine microsculpture, glabrous.Antennae slender, 0.76 times as long body, length ratio of antennomeres equals 11-5-8-13-12-11-11-11-10-10-13.</p><p>Pronotum transverse, 1.63 times as wide as long, lustrous, glabrous, widest in anterior third, sparsely covered with fine punctures and very fine microsculpture. Surface moderately convex with distinct transverse impression at posterior third. Anterior margin shallowly concave, lateral margins rounded, slightly convergent and straight posteriorly, posterior margin nearly straight, sinuate in middle. Anterior margin with very fine almost indistinct border, lateral margins with wider border, posterior margin with distinct narrow border. Anterior angles distinctly swollen, obliquely pronounced, posterior angles obtusangulate, pointed, all angles with setigerous pores bearing long pale seta. Scutellum short and wide, subtriangular, with very widely rounded apex, impunctate, glabrous.</p><p>Elytra 1.46 times as long as wide (measured at humeral calli) and 0.57 times as long as body, slightly divergent posteriorly, widest at posterior third. Surface covered with small dense confused punctures. Humeral calli well developed. Epipleura relatively narrow, smooth, glabrous, lustrous, gradually narrowed towards elytral apex. Macropterous.</p><p>Abdomen: last abdominal ventrite with two V-shaped sharp incisions, median lobe with parallel lateral margins, middle of venrite with distinct subcircular impression.</p><p>Metatrochanter enlarged forming flat, oblique, wedge-shaped process. Tarsi: protarsomere I and II triangular, I slightly wider than II, length ratio of protarsomeres equals 9-7-4-10, of metatarsomeres equals 12-9-4-10.</p><p>Aedeagus (Fig. 27) with triangular apex and laterally extended subapical part. Ventral side with long impressed furrow, oval anteriorly, narrower and parallel posteriorly, posteriorly surrounded by elevated margins.</p><p>Female unknown.</p><p>Differential diagnosis. Agelopsis traxlerorum sp. nov. shares modified male metatrochanters with A. spinipes and A. metallicus . Metatrochanters of A. traxlerorum sp. nov. are wedge-shaped, without distinct tooth (Fig. 31) while metatrochanters of A. spinipes and A. metallicus form distinct tooth (Figs 28–30). All three species differ also in the structure of aedeagus (Figs 22, 23, 27).</p><p>Distribution. China: Yunnan.</p><p>Etymology. Dedicated to all the members of Traxler family (Wien, Austria): Tereza, Erwin, Magdalena, Benjamin, Dominik, and Jakob.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/E02A6172B6102063FF41F886FE16FCA6	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Bezděk, Jan	Bezděk, Jan (2020): Revision of Agelopsis (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Galerucinae). Zootaxa 4731 (2): 223-248, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4731.2.3
