taxonID	type	description	language	source
EB2C87C2FF8DFFCC5EBFF9C3FB3E6DE6.taxon	discussion	Remarks. Left antenna and left hind leg are missing. 2. Brachinus stevensi Andrewes, 1924 a: 107. (Fig. 1 a); Yellow label stating “ Co-type ”. White label stating “ Collection locality; INDIA: Uttar Pradesh (Uttarakhand), R. (river) Sarda Gorge Kumaon; White label stating “ xii. 1918; collected by HG Champion. ” Remarks. Left antenna with scape and pedicle only; right middle and left hind legs are missing.	en	Faisal, Mohammad, Singh, Sudhir (2014): Carabid (Coleoptera) type collection at National Forest Insect Collection (NFIC), Forest Research Institute, Dehradun (India). Zootaxa 3786 (3): 331-358, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3786.3.5
EB2C87C2FF8EFFCE5EBFF877FDAD6B14.taxon	discussion	Remarks. Left middle leg is missing.	en	Faisal, Mohammad, Singh, Sudhir (2014): Carabid (Coleoptera) type collection at National Forest Insect Collection (NFIC), Forest Research Institute, Dehradun (India). Zootaxa 3786 (3): 331-358, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3786.3.5
EB2C87C2FF8FFFCE5EBFFE04FDA268C4.taxon	discussion	Comments. Hypolithus is a synonym of Hyparpalus Alluaud, 1930. The species is now named as Parophonus (Hyparpalus) lividus. Remarks. Right hind leg is missing.	en	Faisal, Mohammad, Singh, Sudhir (2014): Carabid (Coleoptera) type collection at National Forest Insect Collection (NFIC), Forest Research Institute, Dehradun (India). Zootaxa 3786 (3): 331-358, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3786.3.5
EB2C87C2FF8FFFCE5EBFF9A7FAC66D0D.taxon	discussion	Comments. This species is now considered to be a member of the genus Cyclicus Jeannel, 1949.	en	Faisal, Mohammad, Singh, Sudhir (2014): Carabid (Coleoptera) type collection at National Forest Insect Collection (NFIC), Forest Research Institute, Dehradun (India). Zootaxa 3786 (3): 331-358, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3786.3.5
EB2C87C2FF88FFC95EBFFE04FB9A688C.taxon	discussion	Remark. Head is missing. Left foreleg, middle legs and left hind leg are missing.	en	Faisal, Mohammad, Singh, Sudhir (2014): Carabid (Coleoptera) type collection at National Forest Insect Collection (NFIC), Forest Research Institute, Dehradun (India). Zootaxa 3786 (3): 331-358, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3786.3.5
EB2C87C2FF88FFC95EBFFD64FC3969AC.taxon	discussion	Remarks. Right middle leg and hind legs are missing in both specimens.	en	Faisal, Mohammad, Singh, Sudhir (2014): Carabid (Coleoptera) type collection at National Forest Insect Collection (NFIC), Forest Research Institute, Dehradun (India). Zootaxa 3786 (3): 331-358, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3786.3.5
EB2C87C2FF88FFC85EBFFB34FB366B14.taxon	discussion	Remarks. Right antenna and right foreleg are missing. 22. Dromius sphex Andrewes, 1933 b: 407 - 408. Yellow label stating “ Co-type ”. White label stating, “ Collection locality; INDIA: Uttar Pradesh (Uttarakhand), Sijla Gad Chakrata. ” White label stating, “ 12. v. 1922; collected by SN Chatterjee. Comments. This species is now regarded as a member of the genus Calodromius Reitter, 1905.	en	Faisal, Mohammad, Singh, Sudhir (2014): Carabid (Coleoptera) type collection at National Forest Insect Collection (NFIC), Forest Research Institute, Dehradun (India). Zootaxa 3786 (3): 331-358, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3786.3.5
EB2C87C2FF89FFC85EBFFEDCFE7869B9.taxon	discussion	Remarks. Right antenna is missing and left antenna with scape only. Right foreleg with pretarsus only, middle and hind legs are missing.	en	Faisal, Mohammad, Singh, Sudhir (2014): Carabid (Coleoptera) type collection at National Forest Insect Collection (NFIC), Forest Research Institute, Dehradun (India). Zootaxa 3786 (3): 331-358, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3786.3.5
EB2C87C2FF89FFC85EBFFBB6FC726FF5.taxon	discussion	Remarks. Left antenna with scape only. Right hind leg is missing.	en	Faisal, Mohammad, Singh, Sudhir (2014): Carabid (Coleoptera) type collection at National Forest Insect Collection (NFIC), Forest Research Institute, Dehradun (India). Zootaxa 3786 (3): 331-358, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3786.3.5
EB2C87C2FF8AFFCB5EBFFD3DFCE16953.taxon	discussion	Remarks. Right antenna with scape and pedicle only.	en	Faisal, Mohammad, Singh, Sudhir (2014): Carabid (Coleoptera) type collection at National Forest Insect Collection (NFIC), Forest Research Institute, Dehradun (India). Zootaxa 3786 (3): 331-358, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3786.3.5
EB2C87C2FF8AFFCB5EBFFC1EFC1A6FEB.taxon	discussion	Comment. This name is now regarded to be a synonym of Peliocypas Schmidt-Goebel, 1846. 33. Risophilus gardneri Andrewes, 1933 c: 16. (Fig. 3 f) 1 F; Yellow label stating “ Co-type ”. White label stating. “ Collection locality; INDIA: Karnataka, Fraserpet Coorg; ” White label stating “ 2. xi. 1930; Sandal Insect Survey. ” Remarks. Left antenna with scape only. 34. Risophilus himalayicus Andrewes, 1923 c: 688 - 689. Yellow label stating “ Co-type ”. White label stating. “ Collection locality; INDIA: Uttar Pradesh (Uttarakhand), West Almora Division, Kumaon; ” White label stating. “ vi. 1917; collected by HG Champion. ” 35. Risophilus ochroides Andrewes, 1933 c: 17. 1 F 1 M; Yellow label stating “ Co-type ”. White label stating. “ Collection locality; INDIA: Karnataka, Fraserpet Coorg; ” White label stating. “ 25. ii. 1931; FRI Sandal Insect Survey. ” Remarks. Right antenna is missing Middle and hind legs are missing.	en	Faisal, Mohammad, Singh, Sudhir (2014): Carabid (Coleoptera) type collection at National Forest Insect Collection (NFIC), Forest Research Institute, Dehradun (India). Zootaxa 3786 (3): 331-358, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3786.3.5
EB2C87C2FF8AFFCB5EBFF986FAFD6D0B.taxon	discussion	Remarks. Right antenna with scape and pedicle only. Middle legs are missing. Abdomen is damaged.	en	Faisal, Mohammad, Singh, Sudhir (2014): Carabid (Coleoptera) type collection at National Forest Insect Collection (NFIC), Forest Research Institute, Dehradun (India). Zootaxa 3786 (3): 331-358, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3786.3.5
EB2C87C2FF8AFFCA5EBFF82EFDAD6B14.taxon	discussion	Remarks. Left middle leg is missing.	en	Faisal, Mohammad, Singh, Sudhir (2014): Carabid (Coleoptera) type collection at National Forest Insect Collection (NFIC), Forest Research Institute, Dehradun (India). Zootaxa 3786 (3): 331-358, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3786.3.5
EB2C87C2FF8BFFCA5EBFFCD4FDDD6C25.taxon	discussion	Remark. Middle legs, right foreleg and left hind leg are missing. 40. Chlaenius costiger var almorae Andrewes, 1920: 239. Yellow label stating “ Co-type ”. White label stating. “ Collection locality; INDIA: Uttar Pradesh (Uttarakhand), Sunderdbunga Valley, West Almora; ” White label stating “ Nil; collected by HG Champion. ” Comments. almorae Andrewes, 1920 is now considered to be a valid species of C. costiger. Remark. Antennae are missing. 41. Chlaenius himalayicus Andrewes, 1923 d: 335 - 336. (Fig. 4 d) 1 F; Yellow label stating “ Co-type ”. White label stating. “ Collection locality; INDIA: Uttar Pradesh (Uttarakhand), Jaunsar, Chakrata. ” Remarks. Right antenna is missing. Left foreleg and hind legs are missing. 42. Chalaenius omochlorus Andrewes, 1931: 514 - 515. 2 M 1 F; Yellow label stating “ Co-type ”. White label stating. “ Collection locality; INDIA: Uttar Pradesh (Uttarakhand), Dobhalwala, Dehra Dun; ” White label stating. “ 30. x. 1930; collected by M Bose. ”	en	Faisal, Mohammad, Singh, Sudhir (2014): Carabid (Coleoptera) type collection at National Forest Insect Collection (NFIC), Forest Research Institute, Dehradun (India). Zootaxa 3786 (3): 331-358, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3786.3.5
EB2C87C2FF8BFFCA5EBFFE4CFCD068C4.taxon	description	38. Dilonchus bidens Andrewes, 1936: 180. (Fig. 4 c) Yellow label stating “ Co-type ”. White label stating. “ Collection locality; INDIA: Uttar Pradesh (Uttarakhand), Dehra Dun; ” White label stating “ 9. v. 1935; collected by JCM Gardner. ”	en	Faisal, Mohammad, Singh, Sudhir (2014): Carabid (Coleoptera) type collection at National Forest Insect Collection (NFIC), Forest Research Institute, Dehradun (India). Zootaxa 3786 (3): 331-358, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3786.3.5
EB2C87C2FF8BFFCA5EBFFE4CFCD068C4.taxon	discussion	Remarks. Right foreleg and middle leg are missing.	en	Faisal, Mohammad, Singh, Sudhir (2014): Carabid (Coleoptera) type collection at National Forest Insect Collection (NFIC), Forest Research Institute, Dehradun (India). Zootaxa 3786 (3): 331-358, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3786.3.5
EB2C87C2FF84FFC55EBFFAA5FD916D2E.taxon	discussion	Remarks. Antennae with scape only. Right foreleg and right hind leg are missing and left middle leg is detached. 51. Nebria cinctella Andrewes, 1925 b: 311 - 312. (Fig. 5 a) Yellow label stating “ Co-type ”. White label stating “ Collection locality; INDIA: Uttar Pradesh (Uttarakhand), DehraDun, Mothronwala; ” White label stating “ 24. ii. 1922; collected by Dr. Cameron. ” Remarks. Left hind leg is missing.	en	Faisal, Mohammad, Singh, Sudhir (2014): Carabid (Coleoptera) type collection at National Forest Insect Collection (NFIC), Forest Research Institute, Dehradun (India). Zootaxa 3786 (3): 331-358, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3786.3.5
EB2C87C2FF84FFC55EBFFDFBFD586E3A.taxon	discussion	Remarks. Right antenna with scape only.	en	Faisal, Mohammad, Singh, Sudhir (2014): Carabid (Coleoptera) type collection at National Forest Insect Collection (NFIC), Forest Research Institute, Dehradun (India). Zootaxa 3786 (3): 331-358, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3786.3.5
EB2C87C2FF84FFC55EBFFF24FD956BA4.taxon	discussion	Comments. The species is not a member of the tribe Sphodrini, as it is now regarded to be a member of the tribe Chlaeniini. Remarks. Right foreleg is missing.	en	Faisal, Mohammad, Singh, Sudhir (2014): Carabid (Coleoptera) type collection at National Forest Insect Collection (NFIC), Forest Research Institute, Dehradun (India). Zootaxa 3786 (3): 331-358, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3786.3.5
EB2C87C2FF85FFC45EBFFC44FDF16D21.taxon	discussion	Comments. This species is now regarded to be a member of the genus Anchomenus Bonelli, 1810. 55. Agonum comatum var nigriculum Andrewes, 1931: 517 - 518. Yellow label stating “ Co-type ”. White label stating “ Collection locality; INDIA: Uttar Pradesh (Uttarakhand), West Almora Division, Kumaon; ” White label stating “ iii. 1918; collected by HG Champion. ” Comments. Agonum comatum nigriculum is now regarded as a valid subspecies. Remark. Right foreleg and right middle leg are missing. Right hind leg is detached. 56. Agonum euroum Andrewes, 1924 a: 105. Yellow label stating “ Co-type ”. White label stating “ Collection locality; INDIA: Uttar Pradesh (Uttarakhand), Nainital Division, Kumaon; ” White label stating “ ix. 1918; collected by HG Champion. ” Remark. Left antenna and left middle leg are detached. 57. Agonum viator Andrewes, 1931: 513 - 528. (Fig. 5 d) Yellow label stating “ Co-type ”. White label stating “ Collection locality; INDIA: Uttar Pradesh (Uttarakhand), Deoban; ” White label stating “ 25. vi. 1921; Students collection. ” Comments. This species is now regarded as a member of the genus Platynus Bonelli, 1810. Remark. Hind legs are missing.	en	Faisal, Mohammad, Singh, Sudhir (2014): Carabid (Coleoptera) type collection at National Forest Insect Collection (NFIC), Forest Research Institute, Dehradun (India). Zootaxa 3786 (3): 331-358, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3786.3.5
EB2C87C2FF85FFC45EBFFD97FDEB6989.taxon	discussion	Remarks. Right antenna with scape only. Subfamily Platyninae Bonelli, 1810	en	Faisal, Mohammad, Singh, Sudhir (2014): Carabid (Coleoptera) type collection at National Forest Insect Collection (NFIC), Forest Research Institute, Dehradun (India). Zootaxa 3786 (3): 331-358, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3786.3.5
EB2C87C2FF85FFC75EBFF8CFFBDC6BA4.taxon	discussion	Comments. The species is now regarded to be a member of the genus Andrewesius Andrewes, 1939. Remark. Antennae are missing. Right middle leg and hind legs are missing.	en	Faisal, Mohammad, Singh, Sudhir (2014): Carabid (Coleoptera) type collection at National Forest Insect Collection (NFIC), Forest Research Institute, Dehradun (India). Zootaxa 3786 (3): 331-358, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3786.3.5
EB2C87C2FF86FFC75EBFFCADFE886C9F.taxon	discussion	Remark. Right antenna and middle legs are missing. Right hind leg is detached. 64. Calathus pallipes Andrewes, 1934: 213. Yellow label stating “ Co-type ”, White label stating “ Co-type ”. White label stating “ Collection locality; INDIA: Uttar Pradesh (Uttarakhand), Sainj Khand Chakrata; ” White label stating “ 27. v. 1922; collected by Dr. Cameron. ” Comments. This species is now regarded to be a member of the genus Pristosia Motschulsky, 1865. Remark. Right middle leg is missing. 65. Calathus rubricrus Andrewes, 1934: 219 - 220. Yellow label stating “ Co-type ”, White label stating “ Co-type ”. White label stating “ Collection locality; INDIA: Jammu & Kashmir, Lidar Valley; ” White label stating “ 10. vi. 1928; collected by CFC Beeson & BM Bhatia. ” Comments. This name is considered a synonym of Calathus lacerans lacerans Bates, 1889, a member of the genus Pristosia.	en	Faisal, Mohammad, Singh, Sudhir (2014): Carabid (Coleoptera) type collection at National Forest Insect Collection (NFIC), Forest Research Institute, Dehradun (India). Zootaxa 3786 (3): 331-358, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3786.3.5
EB2C87C2FF87FFC65EBFFDDFFBEF6C59.taxon	discussion	Remark. One antenna is missing. Left foreleg, left middle leg and right hind leg are missing. 73. Abacetus vitreus Andrewes, 1942: 32. Red label stating “ Holotype ”. White label stating “ Collection locality; INDIA: Manipur, ” White label stating “ 20. iii. 1924; collected by SN Chatterjee. ”	en	Faisal, Mohammad, Singh, Sudhir (2014): Carabid (Coleoptera) type collection at National Forest Insect Collection (NFIC), Forest Research Institute, Dehradun (India). Zootaxa 3786 (3): 331-358, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3786.3.5
EB2C87C2FF87FFC65EBFF917FD956DBE.taxon	discussion	Comments. This species should be included in the genus Pterostichus Bonelli, 1810; the subgenus is uncertain. Remarks. Right foreleg is missing.	en	Faisal, Mohammad, Singh, Sudhir (2014): Carabid (Coleoptera) type collection at National Forest Insect Collection (NFIC), Forest Research Institute, Dehradun (India). Zootaxa 3786 (3): 331-358, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3786.3.5
EB2C87C2FF80FFC15EBFFD02FAD96F27.taxon	discussion	Comments. This name is a synonym of Amara sikkimensis Andrewes, 1930. 79. Amara latithorax Baliani 1934 b: 110 - 112. (Fig. 6 d) Red label stating “ Holotype ”. White label stating “ Collection locality; INDIA: Uttar Pradesh (Uttarakhand), Mundali Chakrata; ” White label stating “ 12. vi. 1932; collected by BM Bhatia. ” Yellow label stating “ Co-type ” 2 F; White label stating “ Collection locality; INDIA: Uttar Pradesh (Uttarakhand), Mundali Chakrata; ” White label stating “ Nil; collected by CFC Beeson. ” 80. Amara parkeri Baliani, 1934 b: 110 - 112. White label stating “ Holotype ”. White label stating “ Collection locality; INDIA: HP, Nichar, Bashahr State; ” White label stating “ 9. vi. 1928; collected by RN Parker. ”	en	Faisal, Mohammad, Singh, Sudhir (2014): Carabid (Coleoptera) type collection at National Forest Insect Collection (NFIC), Forest Research Institute, Dehradun (India). Zootaxa 3786 (3): 331-358, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3786.3.5
EB2C87C2FF80FFC15EBFFF2BFB27681E.taxon	discussion	Comments. this species is now included in the genus Poecilus (s. str.). Remarks. Both the antennae with scape only. Right foreleg and middle leg are missing. 76. Platysma leus Andrewes, 1927: 65 - 67. Yellow label stating “ Co-type. ” White label stating “ Collection locality; IRAQ: Amara; ” White label stating “ 12. vi. 1916; collected by CFC Beeson. ” This name is a synonym of Poecilus (Ancholeus) wollastoni (Wollaston, 1854). Remarks. Left antenna with scape only. Right middle leg missing and right hind leg detached.	en	Faisal, Mohammad, Singh, Sudhir (2014): Carabid (Coleoptera) type collection at National Forest Insect Collection (NFIC), Forest Research Institute, Dehradun (India). Zootaxa 3786 (3): 331-358, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3786.3.5
EB2C87C2FF81FFC05EBFFE9BFBDF693E.taxon	discussion	Remark: Right hind leg is missing. 86. Dyschirius variabilis Andrewes, 1929 a: 405 - 406. Yellow label stating “ Co-type. ” White label stating “ Collection locality; INDIA: Uttar Pradesh (Uttarakhand), Lachhiwala, Dehra Dun. ” White label stating “ 14. iii. 1922; collected by Dr. Cameron. ” Comments. This name is a synonym of Dyschirius schaumii Putzeys, 1866.	en	Faisal, Mohammad, Singh, Sudhir (2014): Carabid (Coleoptera) type collection at National Forest Insect Collection (NFIC), Forest Research Institute, Dehradun (India). Zootaxa 3786 (3): 331-358, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3786.3.5
EB2C87C2FF81FFC05EBFFC62FD2E6EC8.taxon	discussion	Comments. This species is now regarded to be a member of the genus Distichus Bonelli, 1810. Remarks. Left middle leg is without tarsomeres.	en	Faisal, Mohammad, Singh, Sudhir (2014): Carabid (Coleoptera) type collection at National Forest Insect Collection (NFIC), Forest Research Institute, Dehradun (India). Zootaxa 3786 (3): 331-358, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3786.3.5
EB2C87C2FF81FFDD5EBFF8BEFEA86834.taxon	discussion	Remark. Left antenna is missing. 90. Bembidion babaulti Andrewes, 1924 a: 80. Yellow label stating “ Co-type. ” White label stating “ Collection locality; INDIA: Uttar Pradesh (Uttarakhand), Mossy Falls, Mussoorie. ” White label stating “ 26. iii. 1921; collected by Dr. Cameron. ” 91. Bembidion cameroni Andrewes, 1922 a: 177. Yellow label stating “ Co-type. ” White label stating “ Collection locality; INDIA: Himachal Pradesh, Gahan Simla Hills. ” White label stating “ 25. ix. 1921; collected by SN Chatterjee. ” Comments. This species is now regarded to be a member of the genus Sinechostictus Motschulsky, 1864. 92. Bembidion cimmerium Andrewes, 1922 b: 238. Yellow label stating “ Co-type. ” White label stating “ Collection locality; INDIA: Himachal Pradesh, Gahan Simla Hills. ” White label stating “ 25. ix. 1921; collected by SN Chatterjee. ” Remark. Antennae and fore legs are missing. Left hind leg is missing. 93. Bembidion cimmerium var orinum Andrewes, 1922 a: 239. Yellow label stating “ Co-type. ” White label stating “ Collection locality; INDIA: Uttar Pradesh (Uttarakhand), Sunder nanger, West Almora. ” Nil; White label stating “ collected by HG Champion. ” Comments. This taxon is now considered to be a distinct species from B. cimmerium. 94. Bembidion clarum Andrewes, 1923 b: 98. Yellow label stating “ Co-type. ” White label stating “ Collection locality; INDIA: Uttar Pradesh (Uttarakhand), West Almora Division, Kumaon; White label stating “ xii. 1917; collected by HG Champion. ” 95. Bembidion compactum Andrewes, 1922 b: 240. Yellow label stating “ Co-type. ” White label stating “ Collection locality; INDIA: Uttar Pradesh (Uttarakhand), West Almora Division, Kumaon. ” White label stating “ iv. 1918; collected by HG Champion. ” 96. Bembidion eutherum Andrewes, 1923 b: 96. Yellow label stating “ Co-type. ” White label stating “ Collection locality; INDIA: Uttar Pradesh (Uttarakhand), Dehra Dun, Mussoorie & West Almora Division. ” White label stating “ 31. xii. 1920; collected by Dr. Cameron. ” 97. Bembidion exquisitum Andrewes, 1923 b: 99. Yellow label stating “ Co-type. ” White label stating “ Collection locality; INDIA: Himachal Pradesh, Kotgarh, Simla Hills. ” White label stating “ 18. ix. 1921; collected by SN Chatterjee. ” 98. Bembidion hasurada Andrewes, 1924 a: 77. Yellow label stating “ Co-type. ” White label stating “ Collection locality; INDIA: Uttar Pradesh (Uttarakhand), Naini Tal Div. Kumaon. ” White label stating “ ix. 1918; collected by H. G. Champion. ” 99. Bembidion himalayanum Andrewes, 1924 a: 74. Yellow label stating “ Co-type. ” White label stating “ Collection locality; PAKISTAN: Parachinar Kurram Valley. ” Nil; White label stating HG Champion. ” Remark. Right foreleg, middle leg and hind leg are missing. 100. Bembidion holconotum Andrewes, 1935: 138. 1 F; Yellow label stating “ Co-type. ” White label stating “ Collection locality; INDIA: Jammu & Kashmir, Btote, Kashmir. ” White label stating “ 4. v. 1928; collected by CFC Beeson. ” 101. Bembidion kempi Andrewes, 1922 a: 178. Yellow label stating “ Co-type. ” White label stating “ Collection locality; INDIA: Uttar Pradesh (Uttarakhand), Mossy Falls, W. S. Falls, Mussoorie. White label stating “ 27. iii. 1921; collected by Dr. Cameron. ” 102. Bembidion leander Andrewes, 1935: 127. Yellow label stating “ Co-type. ” White label stating “ Collection locality; INDIA: Himachal Pradesh, Kotkhai, Simla. ” White label stating “ 10. v. 1924; collected by CFC Beeson. ” Comments. This name is a synonym of Bembidion astrabadense Mannerheim in Chaudoir, 1844. Remark: Left hind leg is detached. Right hind leg is missing. 103. Bembidion lissonotum Andrewes, 1935: 192. Yellow label stating “ Co-type. ” White label stating “ Collection locality; INDIA: Jammu & Kashmir, Nagmarg Lolab Valley. ” White label stating “ 19. v. 1928; collected by BM Bhatia. ” Comments. This name is a synonym of Bembidion liparum Andrewes, 1935. 104. Bembidion loricatum Andrewes, 1922 a: 239. Yellow label stating “ Co-type. ” White label stating “ Collection locality; INDIA: Uttar Pradesh (Uttarakhand), West Almora Div. Kumaon. ” White label stating “ iv. 1918; collected by H. G. Champion. ” 105. Bembidion menander Andrewes, 1935: 149 - 150. Yellow label stating “ Co-type. ” White label stating “ Collection locality; INDIA: Uttar Pradesh (Uttarakhand), Konain Chakrata. ” White label stating “ 21. v. 1934; collected by JCM Gardner. ” 106. Bembidion notatum Andrewes, 1922 a: 175. (Fig. 7 c) Yellow label stating “ Co-type. ” White label stating “ Collection locality; INDIA: Uttar Pradesh (Uttarakhand), Binasar Kumaon, Uttaranchal. ” White label stating “ 25. v. 1912; collected by Dr. Cameron. ” Yellow label stating “ Co-type. ” White label stating “ Collection locality; INDIA: Bihar, Pusa. ” White label stating “ v. 1921; collected by Dr. Cameron. ” Yellow label stating “ Co-type. ” White label stating “ Collection locality; INDIA: Uttar Pradesh (Uttarakhand), Chakrata, Dehradun. ” White label stating “ 6. v. 1922; collected by Dr. Cameron. ” 107. Bembidion phaedrum Andrewes, 1923 b: 97. Yellow label stating “ Co-type. ” White label stating “ Collection locality; INDIA: Uttar Pradesh (Uttarakhand), West Almora Division. ” White label stating “ vi. 1917; collected by HG Champion. ” 108. Bembidion polites Andrewes, 1935: 153. Yellow label stating “ Co-type. ” White label stating “ Collection locality; INDIA: Nagaland, Naga Hills. ” White label stating “ 16. iii. 1924; collected by SN Chatterjee. ” 109. Bembidion psilax Andrewes, 1935: 144 - 145. Yellow label stating “ Co-type. ” White label stating “ Collection locality; INDIA: Uttar Pradesh (Uttarakhand), Konain, Chakrata. ” White label stating “ 23. v. 1934; collected by JCM Gardner. ” Comments. This name is a synonym of Bembidion charon Andrewes, 1926. 110. Bembidion psilodorum Andrewes, 1933 b: 412. Yellow label stating “ Co-type. ” White label stating “ Collection locality; INDIA: Jammu & Kashmir, Liderwat, didar Valley. ” White label stating “ 12. vi. 1928; collected by BM Bhatia. ” Remark. Fore legs and right hind leg are missing. 111. Bembidion psuchrum Andrewes, 1922 a: 241. Yellow label stating “ Co-type. ” White label stating “ Collection locality; INDIA: Uttar Pradesh (Uttarakhand), Sunderdhungo Valley, West Almora Division. ” White label stating “ vi. 1919; collected by HG Champion. ” 112. Bembidion radians Andrewes, 1922 a: 177. Yellow label stating “ Co-type. ” White label stating “ Collection locality; INDIA: Uttar Pradesh (Uttarakhand), Sunder dhunga Valley, West Almora Division. ” White label stating “ vi. 1919; collected by HG Champion. ” 114. Bembidion splendens Andrewes, 1923 b: 95. Yellow label stating “ Co-type. ” White label stating “ Collection locality; INDIA: Uttar Pradesh (Uttarakhand), West Almora Division, Kumaon. ” White label stating “ iv. 1918; collected by HG Champion. ” 115. Bembidion trimaculaturn Andrewes, 1927: 68 - 70. Yellow label stating “ Co-type. ” White label stating “ Collection locality; INDIA: Uttar Pradesh (Uttarakhand), Dehra Dun. ” White label stating “ i. 1921; collected by Dr. Cameron. ” Comments. This name is a synonym of Bembidion quadripustulatum Audinet-Serville, 1821. 116. Bembidion xanthochiton Andrewes, 1922 a: 176. Yellow label stating “ Co-type. ” White label stating “ Collection locality; INDIA: Himachal Pradesh, Theog, Simla Hills. ” White label stating “ 10. ix. 1921; collected by SN Chatterjee. ”	en	Faisal, Mohammad, Singh, Sudhir (2014): Carabid (Coleoptera) type collection at National Forest Insect Collection (NFIC), Forest Research Institute, Dehradun (India). Zootaxa 3786 (3): 331-358, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3786.3.5
EB2C87C2FF9CFFDF5EBFFD64FB9D6F14.taxon	discussion	Comments. This species is now regarded to be a member of Elaphropus (Tachyura). Remarks. Antennae and middle legs are missing. 118. Tachys blandus Andrewes, 1924 a: 85. Yellow label stating “ Co-type. ” White label stating “ Collection locality; INDIA: Uttar Pradesh (Uttarakhand), Mossy Falls, Mussoorie. ” White label stating “ 20. iii. 1921; collected by Dr. Cameron. ” Comments. This species is now regarded as a member of Elaphropus (Tachyura). 119. Tachys bombycinus Andrewes, 1925 c: 385. Yellow label stating “ Co-type. ” White label stating “ Collection locality; INDIA: Uttar Pradesh (Uttarakhand), DehraDun. ” White label stating “ 31. xii. 1920; collected by Dr. Cameron. ” Comments. This species is now regarded as a member of Elaphropus (Tachyura). 120. Tachys ceylanicus var polyporus Nietner, 1858: 423. Yellow label stating “ Co-type. ” White label stating “ Collection locality; INDIA: Uttar Pradesh (Uttarakhand), Dehra Dun. ” White label stating “ 27. xii. 1920; collected by Dr. Cameron. ” Comments. Elaphropus (Tachyura) polyporus (Andrewes, 1925) is now considered to be a distinct species from Elaphropus (Tachyura) ceylanicus (Nietner, 1858). Remarks. Right foreleg and right middle leg are missing. 121. Tachys chalceus Andrewes, 1925 c: 415. Yellow label stating “ Co-type. ” White label stating “ Collection locality; INDIA: Uttar Pradesh (Uttarakhand), West Almora, Kumaon. ” White label stating “ collected by HG Champion. ” Comments. This species is now regarded as a member of Elaphropus (Tachyura). 122. Tachys championi Andrewes, 1925 c: 453. Yellow label stating “ Co-type. ” White label stating “ Collection locality; INDIA: Uttar Pradesh (Uttarakhand), W. Almora Div. Kumaon. ” White label stating “ vi. 1917; collected by HG Champion. ” Comments. This species is now regarded as a member of Elaphropus (Tachyura). Remarks. Right antenna is missing. 123. Tachys comptus var borealis Andrewes, 1925 c: 461 - 462. Yellow label stating “ Co-type. ” White label stating “ Collection locality; INDIA: Uttar Pradesh (Uttarakhand), DehraDun. ” White label stating “ 16. iii. 1921; collected by Dr. Cameron. ” Comments. Elaphropus (Nototachys) borealis (Andrewes, 1925) is now considered to be a distinct species from Elaphropus (Nototachys) comptus (Andrewes, 1922). Remarks. Right antenna with scape only. Left foreleg and middle legs are missing. 124. Tachys comptus var pluripunctus Andrewes, 1925 c: 462. Yellow label stating “ Co-type. ” White label stating “ Collection locality; INDIA: Uttar Pradesh (Uttarakhand), West Almora Division, Kumaon. ” White label stating “ Nil; collected by HG Champion. ” Comments. Elaphropus (Nototachys) pluripunctus (Andrewes, 1925) is now considered to be a distinct species from Elaphropus (Nototachys) comptus (Andrewes, 1922). 125. Tachys haliploides var asthenes Andrewes, 1925 c: 462. (Fig. 7 d) Yellow label stating “ Co-type. ” White label stating “ Collection locality; INDIA: Uttar Pradesh (Uttarakhand), DehraDun. ” White label stating “ 12. iii. 1922; collected by SN Chatterjee. ” Comments. Elaphropus (s. str.) asthenes (Andrewes, 1925) is now considered to be a distinct species from Elaphropus (s. str.) haliploides (Bates, 1892). Remarks. Hind legs are missing. 126. Tachys haliploides var nigrinus Andrewes, 1925 c: 479. Yellow label stating “ Co-type. ” White label stating “ Collection locality; INDIA: Uttar Pradesh (Uttarakhand), DehraDun. ” White label stating “ iv. 1919; collected by HG Champion. ” Comments. Elaphropus (s. str.) nigrinus (Andrewes, 1925) is now considered to be a distinct species from Elaphropus (s. str.) haliploides (Bates, 1892). 127. Tachys latus Peyron, 1858: 364. Yellow label stating “ Co-type. ” White label stating “ Collection locality; INDIA: West Bengal, Sarda Bengal. ” White label stating “ FWChampion. ” Comments. This species is now regarded as a member of Elaphropus (Tachyura). Remarks. Right middle leg and hind legs are missing. 128. Tachys micraulax Andrewes, 1924 b: 115 - 116. Yellow label stating “ Co-type. ” White label stating “ Collection locality; INDIA: Uttar Pradesh (Uttarakhand), Khaula Almora. ” White label stating “ collected by HG Champion. ” Comments. This species is now regarded as a member of Elaphropus (Tachyura). 129. Tachys ochrias Andrewes, 1925 c: 374. (Fig. 7 e) Yellow label stating “ Co-type. ” White label stating “ Collection locality; INDIA: Uttar Pradesh (Uttarakhand), Mussoorie. White label stating “ 12. xi. 1921; collected by SN Chatterjee. ” Comments. This species is now regarded as a member of Tachys (Polyderis). 130. Tachys opacus Andrewes, 1925 c: 483. Yellow label stating “ Co-type. ” White label stating “ Collection locality; INDIA: West Bengal, Sarda, Bengal. ” White label stating “ Nil; collected by FW Champion & HG Champion. ” Comments. This species is now regarded as a member of Elaphropus (s. str.). Remarks. Legs are missing. 131. Tachys opacus var bicolor Andrewes, 1925 c: 484. Yellow label stating “ Co-type. ” White label stating “ Collection locality; INDIA: West Bengal, Sarda Bengal. ” White label stating “ Nil; collected by FW Champion & HG Champion. ” Comments. Elaphropus (s. str.) bicolor (Andrewes, 1925) is now considered to be a distinct species from Elphropus (s. str.) opacus. Remarks. Left antenna and legs are missing. 132. Tachys rhombophorus Andrewes, 1925 c: 390. Yellow label stating “ Co-type. ” White label stating “ Collection locality; INDIA: Uttar Pradesh (Uttarakhand), R. Song, DehraDun. ” White label stating “ 28. ii. 1921; collected by SN Chatterjee. ” Comments. This species is now regarded as a member of Elaphropus (Tachyura). 133. Tachys rhombophorus var evanidus Andrewes, 1925 c: 391. Yellow label stating “ Co-type. ” White label stating “ Collection locality; INDIA: Uttar Pradesh (Uttarakhand), Dehra Dun. ” White label stating “ xii. 1920; collected by Dr. Cameron. ” Comments. A synonym of Elaphropus (Tachyura) rhombophorus. 134. Tachys salemus Andrewes, 1933 c: 6 - 7. 1 F; Yellow label stating “ Co-type. ” White label stating “ Collection locality; INDIA: Tamilnadu, Jawalgiri, North Salem. White label stating “ 18. iii. 1930; FRI Sandal Insect Survey. ” Comments. This species is now regarded as a member of Elaphropus (Tachyura). Remarks. Head is missing. Middle legs are missing. 135. Tachys stevensi Andrewes, 1925 c: 445. Yellow label stating “ Co-type. ” White label stating “ Collection locality; INDIA: Uttar Pradesh (Uttarakhand), West Almora Division, Kumaon. ” White label stating “ xi. 1918; collected by HG Champion. ” Comments. This species is now regarded as a member of Elaphropus (Tachyura). Remarks. Right antenna with scape only. 136. Tachys tagax Andrewes, 1925 c: 444. Yellow label stating “ Co-type. ” White label stating “ Collection locality; INDIA: Uttar Pradesh (Uttarakhand), Almora. ” White label stating “ vi. 1919; collected by HG Champion. ” Comments. This species is now regarded as a member of Elaphropus (Tachyura). 137. Tachys vafer Andrewes, 1935: 264 - 265. Yellow label stating “ Co-type. ” White label stating “ Collection locality; INDIA: Madhya Pradesh, Kanha Banjar, Mandla. White label stating “ 21. xii. 1926; collected by BM Bhatia. ” Comments. This species is now regarded as a member of Elaphropus (Tachyura). 138. Tachys vagabundus Andrewes, 1935: 266 - 267. Green label stating “ Co-type. ” White label stating “ Collection locality; INDIA: Uttar Pradesh (Uttarakhand), Aglar, Tehri State. ” White label stating “ 16. iv. 1922; collected by Dr. Cameron. ” Green label stating “ Co-type. ” White label stating “ Collection locality; INDIA: Assam, Haflong, Cacher. ” White label stating “ 5. v. 1925; collected by CFC Beeson. ” Comments. This species is now regarded as a member of Elaphropus (Tachyura).	en	Faisal, Mohammad, Singh, Sudhir (2014): Carabid (Coleoptera) type collection at National Forest Insect Collection (NFIC), Forest Research Institute, Dehradun (India). Zootaxa 3786 (3): 331-358, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3786.3.5
EB2C87C2FF9EFFDF5EBFFA1FFC816C62.taxon	discussion	Remarks. Right middle leg with scape and pedicel only.	en	Faisal, Mohammad, Singh, Sudhir (2014): Carabid (Coleoptera) type collection at National Forest Insect Collection (NFIC), Forest Research Institute, Dehradun (India). Zootaxa 3786 (3): 331-358, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.3786.3.5
