taxonID	type	description	language	source
E81E87B17E639E00FF56F902FE16FE38.taxon	materials_examined	Ascherson & Graebner (1902: 420) consider Agrimonia grandis Andrz. ex C. A. Mey as a synonym of their var. grandis. Since Agrimonia grandis Andrz. ex C. A. Mey is invalid (see discussion above), the var. grandis can be interpreted as a replaced name (at different rank) and the original material for the name A. eupatoria var. grandis should be included in the Andrzejowski’s or Meyer’s collections that are currently preserved at LE. No exsiccata of A. grandis were found in LE (P. Efimov pers. comm.). Lacking original material I have decided to designate a neotype (Art. 9.7 of the ICN). On the basis of the diagnosis of the var. grandis by Ascherson & Graebner (l. c.) and the specimens examined, I select an exsiccatum preserved at FI collected by J. R. Akeroyd et al. in Calabria region (see “ Taxonomic treatment ”).	en	Iamonico, Duilio (2017): Agrimonia eupatoria subsp. major stat. nov. (Rosaceae) and notes on the Agrimonia eupatoria aggregate. Phytotaxa 298 (2): 165-172, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.298.2.6, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.298.2.6
E81E87B17E619E01FF56FA6DFB51F9EB.taxon	materials_examined	Type (lectotype designated by V. Skalický, see The Natural History Museum 2011): — ORIGIN UNKNOWN, Habitat in Europae, pratis apricis argillaceis, Linnaeus 628.1 (LINN!, image of the lectotype available at http: // linnean-online. org / 4561 /).	en	Iamonico, Duilio (2017): Agrimonia eupatoria subsp. major stat. nov. (Rosaceae) and notes on the Agrimonia eupatoria aggregate. Phytotaxa 298 (2): 165-172, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.298.2.6, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.298.2.6
E81E87B17E619E06FF56F9F7FB2BFE48.taxon	materials_examined	Type (lectotype designated by Skalický 1968 b): — RUSSIA, Oblast’ di Orenburg, Prope Orenburg (Čkalov, opp. Ad pedem montium uralensium), 1848, Schell s. n. (LE).	en	Iamonico, Duilio (2017): Agrimonia eupatoria subsp. major stat. nov. (Rosaceae) and notes on the Agrimonia eupatoria aggregate. Phytotaxa 298 (2): 165-172, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.298.2.6, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.298.2.6
E81E87B17E619E06FF56F9F7FB2BFE48.taxon	description	1 A biogeographical study is in preparation by the author of the present paper and I prefer to avoid the publication of partial data. On the whole, the distribution areas of the three suspecies are: N-C-S-Europe, W-Siberia, Caucasus, SW-Asia (Adzerbaijan, Afghanistan), for the subsp. eupatoria, S- and SE-Europe, N-Africa, SW-Asia (Turkey, Iran) for the subsp. major, and SE-Russia, C- and SW-Asia for the subsp. asiatica.	en	Iamonico, Duilio (2017): Agrimonia eupatoria subsp. major stat. nov. (Rosaceae) and notes on the Agrimonia eupatoria aggregate. Phytotaxa 298 (2): 165-172, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.298.2.6, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.298.2.6
E81E87B17E619E06FF56F9F7FB2BFE48.taxon	materials_examined	Type (neotype here designated): — ITALY, Cosenza: Monte Pollino, road to Col di Dragone from Mormanno, 25. VII. 1983, Akeroyd et al. s. n. (FI!) (Fig. 1).	en	Iamonico, Duilio (2017): Agrimonia eupatoria subsp. major stat. nov. (Rosaceae) and notes on the Agrimonia eupatoria aggregate. Phytotaxa 298 (2): 165-172, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.298.2.6, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.298.2.6
