taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
ED69878E097EFB1DFF2FFA75FD0D248A.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/13637924/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13637924	FIGURES 212–216. Light micrographs of some of the new combinations proposed in this study. Fig. 212: BM63525, Entogoniopsis dutertrei, Kusnetzk, Russia. Fig. 213: BM37991, Entogoniopsis pseudonervata, Oamaru, New Zealand. Fig. 214: ANSP slide SchAR3461, Entogoniopsis curvinervia, Barbadoes, holotype. Micrograph by Jennifer Beals. Fig. 215: BM63762, Entogoniopsis curvicostata, Joe’s River, Barbadoes (label reads: ‘Triceratium pallidum’). Fig. 216: BM37989, Entogoniopsis truncata, Springfield, Barbadoes.	FIGURES 212–216. Light micrographs of some of the new combinations proposed in this study. Fig. 212: BM63525, Entogoniopsis dutertrei, Kusnetzk, Russia. Fig. 213: BM37991, Entogoniopsis pseudonervata, Oamaru, New Zealand. Fig. 214: ANSP slide SchAR3461, Entogoniopsis curvinervia, Barbadoes, holotype. Micrograph by Jennifer Beals. Fig. 215: BM63762, Entogoniopsis curvicostata, Joe’s River, Barbadoes (label reads: ‘Triceratium pallidum’). Fig. 216: BM37989, Entogoniopsis truncata, Springfield, Barbadoes.	2015-05-26	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.		Zenodo	biologists	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.			
ED69878E097EFB1DFF2FF931FCD1256A.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/13637924/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13637924	FIGURES 212–216. Light micrographs of some of the new combinations proposed in this study. Fig. 212: BM63525, Entogoniopsis dutertrei, Kusnetzk, Russia. Fig. 213: BM37991, Entogoniopsis pseudonervata, Oamaru, New Zealand. Fig. 214: ANSP slide SchAR3461, Entogoniopsis curvinervia, Barbadoes, holotype. Micrograph by Jennifer Beals. Fig. 215: BM63762, Entogoniopsis curvicostata, Joe’s River, Barbadoes (label reads: ‘Triceratium pallidum’). Fig. 216: BM37989, Entogoniopsis truncata, Springfield, Barbadoes.	FIGURES 212–216. Light micrographs of some of the new combinations proposed in this study. Fig. 212: BM63525, Entogoniopsis dutertrei, Kusnetzk, Russia. Fig. 213: BM37991, Entogoniopsis pseudonervata, Oamaru, New Zealand. Fig. 214: ANSP slide SchAR3461, Entogoniopsis curvinervia, Barbadoes, holotype. Micrograph by Jennifer Beals. Fig. 215: BM63762, Entogoniopsis curvicostata, Joe’s River, Barbadoes (label reads: ‘Triceratium pallidum’). Fig. 216: BM37989, Entogoniopsis truncata, Springfield, Barbadoes.	2015-05-26	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.		Zenodo	biologists	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.			
ED69878E097EFB1CFF2FF80FFE8A22EB.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/13637924/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13637924	FIGURES 212–216. Light micrographs of some of the new combinations proposed in this study. Fig. 212: BM63525, Entogoniopsis dutertrei, Kusnetzk, Russia. Fig. 213: BM37991, Entogoniopsis pseudonervata, Oamaru, New Zealand. Fig. 214: ANSP slide SchAR3461, Entogoniopsis curvinervia, Barbadoes, holotype. Micrograph by Jennifer Beals. Fig. 215: BM63762, Entogoniopsis curvicostata, Joe’s River, Barbadoes (label reads: ‘Triceratium pallidum’). Fig. 216: BM37989, Entogoniopsis truncata, Springfield, Barbadoes.	FIGURES 212–216. Light micrographs of some of the new combinations proposed in this study. Fig. 212: BM63525, Entogoniopsis dutertrei, Kusnetzk, Russia. Fig. 213: BM37991, Entogoniopsis pseudonervata, Oamaru, New Zealand. Fig. 214: ANSP slide SchAR3461, Entogoniopsis curvinervia, Barbadoes, holotype. Micrograph by Jennifer Beals. Fig. 215: BM63762, Entogoniopsis curvicostata, Joe’s River, Barbadoes (label reads: ‘Triceratium pallidum’). Fig. 216: BM37989, Entogoniopsis truncata, Springfield, Barbadoes.	2015-05-26	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.		Zenodo	biologists	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.			
ED69878E097AFB18FF2FFA34FA652A47.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/13637916/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13637916	FIGURES 179–184. Scanning electron micrographs of Entogoniopsis foveata from Barbadoes. Fig. 179: External view of a specimen with fractured pseudocelli. Arrow points to the location of the central areola. Fig. 180: Internal view of a hypovalve with attached valvocopula and a displaced band of the epicingulum. Arrow indicates the location of the central areola. Fig. 181: Oblique external view of the specimen in Fig. 179. Note the fractures on the mantle revealing the internal costae (arrows). Fig. 182: Detail of the specimen in Fig. 180 showing the interior of the trifolium. Note well-preserved cribra visible on the underside of the depressed sector (arrowhead), and the absence of an internal slit in association with the central areola. Fig. 183: Detail of the specimen in Fig. 180, showing the girdle elements: attached valvocopula (VC) and the detached copula or pleura (C/P?). Arrow indicates one of the clasping devices that link the valvocopula to the internal costae. Fig. 184: Detail of the specimen in Fig. 180, showing the hyaline pars interior of the displaced girdle element (arrow), and the step on the mantle (arrowhead). Note well-preserved cribra visible on the mantle (black arrow).	FIGURES 179–184. Scanning electron micrographs of Entogoniopsis foveata from Barbadoes. Fig. 179: External view of a specimen with fractured pseudocelli. Arrow points to the location of the central areola. Fig. 180: Internal view of a hypovalve with attached valvocopula and a displaced band of the epicingulum. Arrow indicates the location of the central areola. Fig. 181: Oblique external view of the specimen in Fig. 179. Note the fractures on the mantle revealing the internal costae (arrows). Fig. 182: Detail of the specimen in Fig. 180 showing the interior of the trifolium. Note well-preserved cribra visible on the underside of the depressed sector (arrowhead), and the absence of an internal slit in association with the central areola. Fig. 183: Detail of the specimen in Fig. 180, showing the girdle elements: attached valvocopula (VC) and the detached copula or pleura (C/P?). Arrow indicates one of the clasping devices that link the valvocopula to the internal costae. Fig. 184: Detail of the specimen in Fig. 180, showing the hyaline pars interior of the displaced girdle element (arrow), and the step on the mantle (arrowhead). Note well-preserved cribra visible on the mantle (black arrow).	2015-05-26	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.		Zenodo	biologists	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.			
ED69878E097AFB18FF2FFA34FA652A47.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/13637918/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13637918	FIGURES 185–192. Light micrographs showing the range of morphological variation in Entogoniopsis foveata. Fig. 185: BM68637, Joe’s River, Barbadoes (labelled as ‘T. lobato-gemmatum’). Fig. 186: BM63574, Joe’s River, Barbadoes. Fig. 187: BM61082, Chalky Mount, Barbadoes. Fig. 188: BM3072, Cambridge, Barbadoes, T. foveatum, holotype. Fig. 189: BM66525, Chalky Mount, Barbadoes. Fig. 190: BM37839, Springfield, Barbadoes. Fig. 191: BM coll. Adams TS266, Barbadoes. Fig. 192: BM3044, Barbadoes, T. picturatum, holotype.	FIGURES 185–192. Light micrographs showing the range of morphological variation in Entogoniopsis foveata. Fig. 185: BM68637, Joe’s River, Barbadoes (labelled as ‘T. lobato-gemmatum’). Fig. 186: BM63574, Joe’s River, Barbadoes. Fig. 187: BM61082, Chalky Mount, Barbadoes. Fig. 188: BM3072, Cambridge, Barbadoes, T. foveatum, holotype. Fig. 189: BM66525, Chalky Mount, Barbadoes. Fig. 190: BM37839, Springfield, Barbadoes. Fig. 191: BM coll. Adams TS266, Barbadoes. Fig. 192: BM3044, Barbadoes, T. picturatum, holotype.	2015-05-26	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.		Zenodo	biologists	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.			
ED69878E0975FB16FF2FFE37FE642557.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/13637904/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13637904	FIGURES 161–167. Scanning electron micrographs of Entogoniopsis gleseri from dredging DODO-123-D1, Mascarene Ridge, Indian Ocean. Fig. 161: External valve view of a specimen with multiple prominent external tubes of rimoportulae (arrow). Fig. 162: Oblique external view of the specimen in Fig. 161, showing a distinct central trifolium on the valve face, and an attached valvocopula (VC). Fig. 163: Detail of a polar elevation, showing a pseudocellus on the flat summit, and on the distal face. Fig. 164: Internal view of the mantle, showing the inconspicuous internal costae (arrows). Fig. 165: Oblique internal view of a specimen with two rimoportulae, and an attached valvocopula (VC). Arrows indicate the internal openings of the rimoportulae. Fig. 166: Detail of the specimen in Fig. 165, showing clasping devices attached to internal costae. Fig. 167: Detail of the specimen in Fig. 162, showing the long, non-buttressed external tubes of the rimoportulae.	FIGURES 161–167. Scanning electron micrographs of Entogoniopsis gleseri from dredging DODO-123-D1, Mascarene Ridge, Indian Ocean. Fig. 161: External valve view of a specimen with multiple prominent external tubes of rimoportulae (arrow). Fig. 162: Oblique external view of the specimen in Fig. 161, showing a distinct central trifolium on the valve face, and an attached valvocopula (VC). Fig. 163: Detail of a polar elevation, showing a pseudocellus on the flat summit, and on the distal face. Fig. 164: Internal view of the mantle, showing the inconspicuous internal costae (arrows). Fig. 165: Oblique internal view of a specimen with two rimoportulae, and an attached valvocopula (VC). Arrows indicate the internal openings of the rimoportulae. Fig. 166: Detail of the specimen in Fig. 165, showing clasping devices attached to internal costae. Fig. 167: Detail of the specimen in Fig. 162, showing the long, non-buttressed external tubes of the rimoportulae.	2015-05-26	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.		Zenodo	biologists	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.			
ED69878E0975FB16FF2FFE37FE642557.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/13637910/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13637910	FIGURES 168–170. Light micrographs showing the range of morphological variation in Entogoniopsis gleseri. Figs 168–170: BM101699, dredging DODO-123-D1, Mascarene Ridge, Indian Ocean. Specimen in Fig. 170 is the holotype.	FIGURES 168–170. Light micrographs showing the range of morphological variation in Entogoniopsis gleseri. Figs 168–170: BM101699, dredging DODO-123-D1, Mascarene Ridge, Indian Ocean. Specimen in Fig. 170 is the holotype.	2015-05-26	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.		Zenodo	biologists	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.			
ED69878E0968FB0DFF2FFAEDFB9D2388.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/13637851/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13637851	FIGURES 24–30. Scanning electron micrographs of Entogoniopsis grunowii from Vema Cruise 18, Core 112 (Figs 24–25, 27) and Vema Cruise 17, Core 107 (Figs 26, 28–30), South Atlantic Ocean. Fig. 24: Oblique external view. Note the location of the hyaline marginal ridge below the highest level of the valve face (black arrow), and the central ring of rimoportulae (arrowhead). White arrow indicates the furrow above the hyaline margin of the mantle. Fig. 25: Oblique internal view, showing the location of the central ring of rimoportulae (arrowhead), bifurcations of costae on the mantle, and the inwardly expanded hyaline margin of the mantle. White arrow indicates the furrow above the hyaline margin of the mantle. Fig. 26: Detail of the specimen in Fig. 29, showing well-preserved volae. Fig. 27: Detail of the specimen in Fig. 24, showing fractured non-buttressed external tubes of the rimoportulae (arrow). Fig. 28: Detail of the specimen in Fig. 25, showing internal openings of the rimoportulae arranged in a regular ring. Fig. 29: Oblique internal view of a hypovalve with attached valvocopula (VC), and a detached band of the epicingulum showing a fimbriate edge (arrow). Fig. 30: Detail of the specimen in Fig. 29, showing clasping devices that attach the valvocopula to the internal costae (arrow).	FIGURES 24–30. Scanning electron micrographs of Entogoniopsis grunowii from Vema Cruise 18, Core 112 (Figs 24–25, 27) and Vema Cruise 17, Core 107 (Figs 26, 28–30), South Atlantic Ocean. Fig. 24: Oblique external view. Note the location of the hyaline marginal ridge below the highest level of the valve face (black arrow), and the central ring of rimoportulae (arrowhead). White arrow indicates the furrow above the hyaline margin of the mantle. Fig. 25: Oblique internal view, showing the location of the central ring of rimoportulae (arrowhead), bifurcations of costae on the mantle, and the inwardly expanded hyaline margin of the mantle. White arrow indicates the furrow above the hyaline margin of the mantle. Fig. 26: Detail of the specimen in Fig. 29, showing well-preserved volae. Fig. 27: Detail of the specimen in Fig. 24, showing fractured non-buttressed external tubes of the rimoportulae (arrow). Fig. 28: Detail of the specimen in Fig. 25, showing internal openings of the rimoportulae arranged in a regular ring. Fig. 29: Oblique internal view of a hypovalve with attached valvocopula (VC), and a detached band of the epicingulum showing a fimbriate edge (arrow). Fig. 30: Detail of the specimen in Fig. 29, showing clasping devices that attach the valvocopula to the internal costae (arrow).	2015-05-26	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.		Zenodo	biologists	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.			
ED69878E0968FB0DFF2FFAEDFB9D2388.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/13637853/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13637853	FIGURES 31–36. Light micrographs showing the range of morphological variation in Entogoniopsis grunowii (Figs 31, 33–36) in comparison to Entogonia davyana (Greville) Greville (Fig. 32). Fig. 31: BM coll. Adams TS426, Allan’s Farm, Oamaru, New Zealand; Fig. 32: BM63959, Joe’s River, Barbadoes. Fig. 33: SZCZ15073, DSDP sample 29-281-16CC, South Tasman Rise. Fig. 34: BM46607, Oamaru, New Zealand, holotype. Fig. 35: BM coll. Adams G68, Railway Cutting 1, Oamaru, New Zealand. Fig. 36: BM63654, Oamaru, New Zealand.	FIGURES 31–36. Light micrographs showing the range of morphological variation in Entogoniopsis grunowii (Figs 31, 33–36) in comparison to Entogonia davyana (Greville) Greville (Fig. 32). Fig. 31: BM coll. Adams TS426, Allan’s Farm, Oamaru, New Zealand; Fig. 32: BM63959, Joe’s River, Barbadoes. Fig. 33: SZCZ15073, DSDP sample 29-281-16CC, South Tasman Rise. Fig. 34: BM46607, Oamaru, New Zealand, holotype. Fig. 35: BM coll. Adams G68, Railway Cutting 1, Oamaru, New Zealand. Fig. 36: BM63654, Oamaru, New Zealand.	2015-05-26	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.		Zenodo	biologists	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.			
ED69878E0968FB0DFF2FFAEDFB9D2388.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/13637841/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13637841	FIGURES 1–5. An overview of valve morphology in Triceratium Ehrenberg sensu stricto and Entogonia Greville. Figs 1–2: Triceratium sp. aff. T. favus Ehrenberg. Fig. 1: Oblique external view showing rows of pseudoloculi on the valve face, marginal rows of rimoportulae (arrowhead), and polar ocelli (arrow). Fig. 2: Oblique internal view, showing internal openings of rimoportulae aligned in marginal rows (arrowhead). Fig. 3: Entogonia sp. Holmes & Brigger, oblique external view of a frustule with attached valvocopula. Note the polar and lateral exit pores of the internal coil, indicated by the arrow and arrowhead, respectively. Fig. 4: Entogonia davyana Greville in external valve view, polar exit pore indicated by the arrow. Fig. 5: Entogonia cloudi Holmes & Brigger, internal valve view, showing a well-preserved internal coil (arrow), and prominent internal costae (arrowhead).	FIGURES 1–5. An overview of valve morphology in Triceratium Ehrenberg sensu stricto and Entogonia Greville. Figs 1–2: Triceratium sp. aff. T. favus Ehrenberg. Fig. 1: Oblique external view showing rows of pseudoloculi on the valve face, marginal rows of rimoportulae (arrowhead), and polar ocelli (arrow). Fig. 2: Oblique internal view, showing internal openings of rimoportulae aligned in marginal rows (arrowhead). Fig. 3: Entogonia sp. Holmes & Brigger, oblique external view of a frustule with attached valvocopula. Note the polar and lateral exit pores of the internal coil, indicated by the arrow and arrowhead, respectively. Fig. 4: Entogonia davyana Greville in external valve view, polar exit pore indicated by the arrow. Fig. 5: Entogonia cloudi Holmes & Brigger, internal valve view, showing a well-preserved internal coil (arrow), and prominent internal costae (arrowhead).	2015-05-26	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.		Zenodo	biologists	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.			
ED69878E0972FB10FF2FFE7FFDFF23D0.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/13637874/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13637874	FIGURES 87–93. Scanning electron micrographs of Entogoniopsis inflata from San Clemente, California, USA. Fig. 87: oblique external view, showing the depressed valve face centre, with coarse, conspicuously domed areolae. The circumferential furrow adjacent to the expanded mantle margin is indicated by the arrowhead. Arrow indicates one of the furrows associated with the internal costae. Fig. 88: Oblique external view of a valve (V) with attached valvocopula (VC). Fig. 89: Oblique internal view of a specimen with a fractured valvocopula, revealing a cross-section through the fossa embracing the inwardly expanded hyaline margin of the mantle (arrowhead). Fig. 90: Detail of the specimen in Fig. 89, showing the clasping devices on the valvocopula embracing the internal costae (arrow). Fig. 91: Detail of the specimen in Fig. 87, showing the absence of a well-defined pseudocellus at the valve pole, a conspicuously stepped mantle (arrow), and a prominent hyaline margin of the mantle expanded toward the exterior (arrowhead). Fig. 92: Detail of the specimen in Fig. 87, showing the finer areolae located next to the valve face margin. Fig. 93: Detail of the specimen in Fig. 87, showing the coarse, domed areolae on the central part of the valve face.	FIGURES 87–93. Scanning electron micrographs of Entogoniopsis inflata from San Clemente, California, USA. Fig. 87: oblique external view, showing the depressed valve face centre, with coarse, conspicuously domed areolae. The circumferential furrow adjacent to the expanded mantle margin is indicated by the arrowhead. Arrow indicates one of the furrows associated with the internal costae. Fig. 88: Oblique external view of a valve (V) with attached valvocopula (VC). Fig. 89: Oblique internal view of a specimen with a fractured valvocopula, revealing a cross-section through the fossa embracing the inwardly expanded hyaline margin of the mantle (arrowhead). Fig. 90: Detail of the specimen in Fig. 89, showing the clasping devices on the valvocopula embracing the internal costae (arrow). Fig. 91: Detail of the specimen in Fig. 87, showing the absence of a well-defined pseudocellus at the valve pole, a conspicuously stepped mantle (arrow), and a prominent hyaline margin of the mantle expanded toward the exterior (arrowhead). Fig. 92: Detail of the specimen in Fig. 87, showing the finer areolae located next to the valve face margin. Fig. 93: Detail of the specimen in Fig. 87, showing the coarse, domed areolae on the central part of the valve face.	2015-05-26	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.		Zenodo	biologists	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.			
ED69878E0972FB10FF2FFE7FFDFF23D0.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/13637876/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13637876	FIGURES 94–96. Light micrographs showing the range of morphological variation in Entogoniopsis inflata. Fig. 94: BM2873, Cambridge, Barbadoes, holotype; Fig. 95: SZCZ17945B, ODP sample 171B-1051A-8H-5, 36–37 cm, Blake Nose, western North Atlantic Ocean; Fig. 96: Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia slide SchAR3460, Barbadoes, holotype of Biddulphia inflata var. recta Boyer. Micrograph by Jonathan English.	FIGURES 94–96. Light micrographs showing the range of morphological variation in Entogoniopsis inflata. Fig. 94: BM2873, Cambridge, Barbadoes, holotype; Fig. 95: SZCZ17945B, ODP sample 171B-1051A-8H-5, 36–37 cm, Blake Nose, western North Atlantic Ocean; Fig. 96: Academy of Natural Sciences of Philadelphia slide SchAR3460, Barbadoes, holotype of Biddulphia inflata var. recta Boyer. Micrograph by Jonathan English.	2015-05-26	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.		Zenodo	biologists	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.			
ED69878E0972FB10FF2FFE7FFDFF23D0.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/13637898/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13637898	FIGURES 145–148. Light micrographs of Entogoniopsis lineolata. Fig. 145: BM coll. Adams F1403, Cambridge, Barbadoes; label reads: ‘Triceratium turgidum’. Fig. 146: BM coll. Adams GC3448, Springfield, Barbadoes; label reads: ‘T. turgidum’. Fig. 147: BM coll. Adams TS929, Joe’s River, Barbadoes; label reads: ‘T. turgidum’. Fig. 148: BM coll. Adams GC3447, Barbadoes; label reads: ‘T. turgidum var. quadrata A.S.’	FIGURES 145–148. Light micrographs of Entogoniopsis lineolata. Fig. 145: BM coll. Adams F1403, Cambridge, Barbadoes; label reads: ‘Triceratium turgidum’. Fig. 146: BM coll. Adams GC3448, Springfield, Barbadoes; label reads: ‘T. turgidum’. Fig. 147: BM coll. Adams TS929, Joe’s River, Barbadoes; label reads: ‘T. turgidum’. Fig. 148: BM coll. Adams GC3447, Barbadoes; label reads: ‘T. turgidum var. quadrata A.S.’	2015-05-26	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.		Zenodo	biologists	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.			
ED69878E0975FB19FF2FF806FC462783.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/13637912/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13637912	FIGURES 171–176. Scanning electron micrographs of Entogoniopsis kempii from dredging DODO-123-D1, Mascarene Ridge, Indian Ocean. Fig. 171: Oblique external view, showing the pattern of valve face undulations. Note the flat summits of the polar elevations, distinctly cut off from the remainder of the valve face by the rugged hyaline marginal ridge (arrow). Location of the rimoportulae is indicated by arrowhead. Fig. 172: Oblique internal view, showing a series of prominent internal costae along each margin. Rimoportulae are indicated by arrowhead. Fig. 173: External view of the valve face, showing five inconspicuous rimoportulae located in the central part of the trifolium (arrows). Fig. 174: Internal view of the central area, showing nine rimoportulae with slightly raised internal openings (arrow). Fig. 175: Detail of a polar elevation, showing a flat summit, and a fractured pseudocellus located on the distal face of the elevation. Fig. 176: Detail of the mantle, showing an inwardly expanded margin (arrow), and robust internal costae.	FIGURES 171–176. Scanning electron micrographs of Entogoniopsis kempii from dredging DODO-123-D1, Mascarene Ridge, Indian Ocean. Fig. 171: Oblique external view, showing the pattern of valve face undulations. Note the flat summits of the polar elevations, distinctly cut off from the remainder of the valve face by the rugged hyaline marginal ridge (arrow). Location of the rimoportulae is indicated by arrowhead. Fig. 172: Oblique internal view, showing a series of prominent internal costae along each margin. Rimoportulae are indicated by arrowhead. Fig. 173: External view of the valve face, showing five inconspicuous rimoportulae located in the central part of the trifolium (arrows). Fig. 174: Internal view of the central area, showing nine rimoportulae with slightly raised internal openings (arrow). Fig. 175: Detail of a polar elevation, showing a flat summit, and a fractured pseudocellus located on the distal face of the elevation. Fig. 176: Detail of the mantle, showing an inwardly expanded margin (arrow), and robust internal costae.	2015-05-26	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.		Zenodo	biologists	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.			
ED69878E0975FB19FF2FF806FC462783.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/13637914/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13637914	FIGURES 177–178. Light micrographs of Entogoniopsis kempii. Figs 177–178: BM101700, dredging DODO-123-D1, Mascarene Ridge, Indian Ocean. Specimen in Fig. 177 is the holotype.	FIGURES 177–178. Light micrographs of Entogoniopsis kempii. Figs 177–178: BM101700, dredging DODO-123-D1, Mascarene Ridge, Indian Ocean. Specimen in Fig. 177 is the holotype.	2015-05-26	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.		Zenodo	biologists	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.			
ED69878E0976FB14FF2FFEE5FB5B20F2.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/13637892/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13637892	FIGURES 128–135. Scanning electron micrographs of tripolar Entogoniopsis lineolata from dredging DODO-123-D1, Mascarene Ridge, Indian Ocean. Fig. 128: External valve view. Location of rimoportulae indicated by arrow. Note spinules arranged in irregular rings on the valve face (arrowhead). Fig. 129: Detail of a polar elevation summit, showing a fractured pseudocellus. Fig. 130: Oblique external view of the specimen in Fig. 128. Note the convexity of the valve face and small thickenings on the hyaline marginal ridge (arrow). Fig. 131: Oblique internal view. Note the irregular ring of rimoportulae, indicated by arrow. Fig. 132: Detail showing a series of marginal internal costae, and a slight inward expansion of the hyaline margin of the mantle (arrowhead). Fig. 133: Detail of the specimen in Fig. 131, showing fractured, non-buttressed external tubes of the rimoportulae, arranged in an irregular ring. Note the spinules, indicated by the arrowhead. Fig. 134: Detail showing internal openings of the rimoportulae, arranged in an irregular ring. Fig. 135: Detail of the mantle, showing elongated areolae immediately below the hyaline marginal ridge (arrow), and rows of granules located between the rows of areolae (arrowhead).	FIGURES 128–135. Scanning electron micrographs of tripolar Entogoniopsis lineolata from dredging DODO-123-D1, Mascarene Ridge, Indian Ocean. Fig. 128: External valve view. Location of rimoportulae indicated by arrow. Note spinules arranged in irregular rings on the valve face (arrowhead). Fig. 129: Detail of a polar elevation summit, showing a fractured pseudocellus. Fig. 130: Oblique external view of the specimen in Fig. 128. Note the convexity of the valve face and small thickenings on the hyaline marginal ridge (arrow). Fig. 131: Oblique internal view. Note the irregular ring of rimoportulae, indicated by arrow. Fig. 132: Detail showing a series of marginal internal costae, and a slight inward expansion of the hyaline margin of the mantle (arrowhead). Fig. 133: Detail of the specimen in Fig. 131, showing fractured, non-buttressed external tubes of the rimoportulae, arranged in an irregular ring. Note the spinules, indicated by the arrowhead. Fig. 134: Detail showing internal openings of the rimoportulae, arranged in an irregular ring. Fig. 135: Detail of the mantle, showing elongated areolae immediately below the hyaline marginal ridge (arrow), and rows of granules located between the rows of areolae (arrowhead).	2015-05-26	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.		Zenodo	biologists	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.			
ED69878E0976FB14FF2FFEE5FB5B20F2.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/13637894/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13637894	FIGURES 136–141. Scanning electron micrographs of quadrate Entogoniopsis lineolata from DSDP Site 6, Bermuda Rise, western North Atlantic Ocean (Figs 136–137, 139–141) and Joe’s River, Barbadoes (Fig. 138). Fig. 136: Oblique external view of a fractured specimen revealing a poroid valve structure. Arrow indicates the location of the central ring of rimoportulae. Fig. 137: Oblique internal view of the specimen in Fig. 136. Rimoportulae are indicated by arrow. Arrowhead shows small tubercles on the hyaline marginal ridge. Fig. 138: Oblique internal view of a small specimen. Note the tubercles on the hyaline marginal ridge (arrowhead). Fig. 139: Detail of the specimen in Fig. 136, showing a well-preserved pseudocellus, granules on the mantle (arrow), and poorly preserved spinules on the valve face (arrowhead). Fig. 140: Detail of the specimen in Fig. 136, showing a cross-section through poroid arolae, and fractured short external tubes of the rimoportulae. Fig. 141: Detail of the internal openings of the rimoportulae on the specimen in Figs 136–137.	FIGURES 136–141. Scanning electron micrographs of quadrate Entogoniopsis lineolata from DSDP Site 6, Bermuda Rise, western North Atlantic Ocean (Figs 136–137, 139–141) and Joe’s River, Barbadoes (Fig. 138). Fig. 136: Oblique external view of a fractured specimen revealing a poroid valve structure. Arrow indicates the location of the central ring of rimoportulae. Fig. 137: Oblique internal view of the specimen in Fig. 136. Rimoportulae are indicated by arrow. Arrowhead shows small tubercles on the hyaline marginal ridge. Fig. 138: Oblique internal view of a small specimen. Note the tubercles on the hyaline marginal ridge (arrowhead). Fig. 139: Detail of the specimen in Fig. 136, showing a well-preserved pseudocellus, granules on the mantle (arrow), and poorly preserved spinules on the valve face (arrowhead). Fig. 140: Detail of the specimen in Fig. 136, showing a cross-section through poroid arolae, and fractured short external tubes of the rimoportulae. Fig. 141: Detail of the internal openings of the rimoportulae on the specimen in Figs 136–137.	2015-05-26	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.		Zenodo	biologists	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.			
ED69878E0976FB14FF2FFEE5FB5B20F2.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/13637896/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13637896	FIGURES 142–144. Light micrographs of Entogoniopsis lineolata versus Triceratium quadratum Greville and Biddulphia quadrans Boyer. Fig. 142: BM2743, E. lineolata, Cambridge, Barbadoes, holotype. Slide thickness prevents Köhler illumination. Fig. 143: BM3263, T. quadratum, Cambridge, Barbadoes, syntype. Slide thickness prevents Köhler illumination. Fig. 144: ANSP slide SchAR3459, B. quadrans, Barbadoes, holotype. Micrograph by Jennifer Beals.	FIGURES 142–144. Light micrographs of Entogoniopsis lineolata versus Triceratium quadratum Greville and Biddulphia quadrans Boyer. Fig. 142: BM2743, E. lineolata, Cambridge, Barbadoes, holotype. Slide thickness prevents Köhler illumination. Fig. 143: BM3263, T. quadratum, Cambridge, Barbadoes, syntype. Slide thickness prevents Köhler illumination. Fig. 144: ANSP slide SchAR3459, B. quadrans, Barbadoes, holotype. Micrograph by Jennifer Beals.	2015-05-26	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.		Zenodo	biologists	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.			
ED69878E0976FB14FF2FFEE5FB5B20F2.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/13637898/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13637898	FIGURES 145–148. Light micrographs of Entogoniopsis lineolata. Fig. 145: BM coll. Adams F1403, Cambridge, Barbadoes; label reads: ‘Triceratium turgidum’. Fig. 146: BM coll. Adams GC3448, Springfield, Barbadoes; label reads: ‘T. turgidum’. Fig. 147: BM coll. Adams TS929, Joe’s River, Barbadoes; label reads: ‘T. turgidum’. Fig. 148: BM coll. Adams GC3447, Barbadoes; label reads: ‘T. turgidum var. quadrata A.S.’	FIGURES 145–148. Light micrographs of Entogoniopsis lineolata. Fig. 145: BM coll. Adams F1403, Cambridge, Barbadoes; label reads: ‘Triceratium turgidum’. Fig. 146: BM coll. Adams GC3448, Springfield, Barbadoes; label reads: ‘T. turgidum’. Fig. 147: BM coll. Adams TS929, Joe’s River, Barbadoes; label reads: ‘T. turgidum’. Fig. 148: BM coll. Adams GC3447, Barbadoes; label reads: ‘T. turgidum var. quadrata A.S.’	2015-05-26	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.		Zenodo	biologists	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.			
ED69878E0973FB13FF2FFE7FFDEA2096.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/13637878/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13637878	FIGURES 97–101. Scanning electron micrographs of Entogoniopsis major from Oamaru, New Zealand. Fig. 97: Oblique external view of a hypovalve with a displaced epicingulum element (C? = copula?). Note the thickenings on the depressed part of the valve face. Fig. 98: Detail of the specimen in Fig. 99, showing poorly preserved clasping devices of the valvocopula attached to the internal costae. Fig. 99: Oblique internal view of a specimen with remnants of the valvocopula attached (arrow). Fig. 100: Girdle view of a specimen with a valvocopula attached (VC). Fig. 101: Oblique internal view of the specimen in Fig. 100, revealing well-preserved clasping devices embracing the internal costae (arrow), and a fossa holding the inward expansion of the mantle margin (arrowhead).	FIGURES 97–101. Scanning electron micrographs of Entogoniopsis major from Oamaru, New Zealand. Fig. 97: Oblique external view of a hypovalve with a displaced epicingulum element (C? = copula?). Note the thickenings on the depressed part of the valve face. Fig. 98: Detail of the specimen in Fig. 99, showing poorly preserved clasping devices of the valvocopula attached to the internal costae. Fig. 99: Oblique internal view of a specimen with remnants of the valvocopula attached (arrow). Fig. 100: Girdle view of a specimen with a valvocopula attached (VC). Fig. 101: Oblique internal view of the specimen in Fig. 100, revealing well-preserved clasping devices embracing the internal costae (arrow), and a fossa holding the inward expansion of the mantle margin (arrowhead).	2015-05-26	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.		Zenodo	biologists	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.			
ED69878E0973FB13FF2FFE7FFDEA2096.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/13637880/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13637880	FIGURES 102–107. Light micrographs showing the range of morphological variation in Entogoniopsis major. Fig. 102: BM coll. Adams G614, Allan’s Farm, Oamaru, New Zealand. Fig. 103: BM37916, Forrester’s, Oamaru, New Zealand. Fig. 104: BM coll. Adams G89, Allan’s Farm, Oamaru, New Zealand. Fig. 105: BM46554, Oamaru, New Zealand, holotype. Fig. 106: BM37914, Forrester’s, Oamaru, New Zealand. Fig. 107: BM coll. Adams G28, Oamaru, New Zealand.	FIGURES 102–107. Light micrographs showing the range of morphological variation in Entogoniopsis major. Fig. 102: BM coll. Adams G614, Allan’s Farm, Oamaru, New Zealand. Fig. 103: BM37916, Forrester’s, Oamaru, New Zealand. Fig. 104: BM coll. Adams G89, Allan’s Farm, Oamaru, New Zealand. Fig. 105: BM46554, Oamaru, New Zealand, holotype. Fig. 106: BM37914, Forrester’s, Oamaru, New Zealand. Fig. 107: BM coll. Adams G28, Oamaru, New Zealand.	2015-05-26	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.		Zenodo	biologists	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.			
ED69878E096BFB0BFF2FFDACFDBA273E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/13637845/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13637845	FIGURES 11–16. Scanning electron micrographs of Entogoniopsis morlandii from Oamaru, New Zealand (Figs 11, 13, 15–16), and Vema Cruise 17, Core 107, South Atlantic Ocean (Figs 12, 14). Fig. 11: Oblique external view, showing a depressed valve face surrounded by a hyaline marginal ridge level with the summits of the polar pseudocelli. Central ring of rimoportulae indicated by arrowhead. Areas of sparse, scattered areolation next to the proximal sides of polar elevations are indicated with arrows. Fig. 12: Oblique internal view showing the prominent internal costae. Central ring of rimoportulae indicated by arrowhead. Fig. 13: Detail of the specimen in Fig. 11, showing fractured buttressed external tubes of the rimoportulae, and partially dissolved volae. Fig. 14: Detail of the specimen in Fig. 12, showing an irregular central ring of rimoportulae, internal openings in the form of slightly raised slits. Fig. 15: Detail of the specimen in Fig. 11, showing one of the polar pseudocelli. Note the flat summit occupying the whole of the pseudocellus located on the valve face. Fig. 16: Detail of a fractured valve revealing a T-shaped cross-section through a costa (arrowhead), and an inward expansion of the hyaline mantle margin (arrow).	FIGURES 11–16. Scanning electron micrographs of Entogoniopsis morlandii from Oamaru, New Zealand (Figs 11, 13, 15–16), and Vema Cruise 17, Core 107, South Atlantic Ocean (Figs 12, 14). Fig. 11: Oblique external view, showing a depressed valve face surrounded by a hyaline marginal ridge level with the summits of the polar pseudocelli. Central ring of rimoportulae indicated by arrowhead. Areas of sparse, scattered areolation next to the proximal sides of polar elevations are indicated with arrows. Fig. 12: Oblique internal view showing the prominent internal costae. Central ring of rimoportulae indicated by arrowhead. Fig. 13: Detail of the specimen in Fig. 11, showing fractured buttressed external tubes of the rimoportulae, and partially dissolved volae. Fig. 14: Detail of the specimen in Fig. 12, showing an irregular central ring of rimoportulae, internal openings in the form of slightly raised slits. Fig. 15: Detail of the specimen in Fig. 11, showing one of the polar pseudocelli. Note the flat summit occupying the whole of the pseudocellus located on the valve face. Fig. 16: Detail of a fractured valve revealing a T-shaped cross-section through a costa (arrowhead), and an inward expansion of the hyaline mantle margin (arrow).	2015-05-26	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.		Zenodo	biologists	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.			
ED69878E096BFB0BFF2FFDACFDBA273E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/13637849/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13637849	FIGURES 17–23. Light micrographs showing the range of morphological variation in Entogoniopsis morlandii. Fig. 17: BM coll. Adams TS315, Oamaru, New Zealand. Fig. 18: BM46565, Oamaru, New Zealand, lectotype. Fig. 19: BM coll. Adams G162, Jackson’s Paddock, Oamaru, New Zealand. Fig. 20: BM coll. Adams G142, Oamaru, New Zealand. Fig. 21: BM coll. Adams TS270, Oamaru, New Zealand. Fig. 22: BM coll. Adams G93, no locality on slide label, presumably Oamaru, New Zealand. Fig. 23: BM coll. Adams TS270, girdle view of a frustule with attached valvocopula, Oamaru, New Zealand.	FIGURES 17–23. Light micrographs showing the range of morphological variation in Entogoniopsis morlandii. Fig. 17: BM coll. Adams TS315, Oamaru, New Zealand. Fig. 18: BM46565, Oamaru, New Zealand, lectotype. Fig. 19: BM coll. Adams G162, Jackson’s Paddock, Oamaru, New Zealand. Fig. 20: BM coll. Adams G142, Oamaru, New Zealand. Fig. 21: BM coll. Adams TS270, Oamaru, New Zealand. Fig. 22: BM coll. Adams G93, no locality on slide label, presumably Oamaru, New Zealand. Fig. 23: BM coll. Adams TS270, girdle view of a frustule with attached valvocopula, Oamaru, New Zealand.	2015-05-26	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.		Zenodo	biologists	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.			
ED69878E096CFB11FF2FF8CDFCE923D0.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/13637868/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13637868	FIGURES 69–75. Scanning electron micrographs of Entogoniopsis novazealandica from Oamaru, New Zealand. Fig. 69: Oblique external view, showing the depressed valve face centre. Fig. 70: Detail of a hemispherical pseudocellus. Fig. 71: Oblique internal view of the specimen in Fig. 69. Note the absence of rimoportulae within the central depression. Arrow indicates a transverse costa next to the proximal side of a polar elevation. Fig. 72: Oblique external view of a specimen with a circumferential raised sector adjacent to the central depression. Fig. 73: Girdle view of a specimen with highly elevated polar pseudocelli. Note the offset of the polar elevations from the valve margin. Fig. 74: Oblique view of a specimen with attached valvocopula. Note clasping devices indicated by arrows. Fig. 75: Detail of the valvocopula attachment, with two clasping devices embracing internal costae visible. Arrow indicates the fossa, attached to the inwardly expanded hyaline margin of the mantle.	FIGURES 69–75. Scanning electron micrographs of Entogoniopsis novazealandica from Oamaru, New Zealand. Fig. 69: Oblique external view, showing the depressed valve face centre. Fig. 70: Detail of a hemispherical pseudocellus. Fig. 71: Oblique internal view of the specimen in Fig. 69. Note the absence of rimoportulae within the central depression. Arrow indicates a transverse costa next to the proximal side of a polar elevation. Fig. 72: Oblique external view of a specimen with a circumferential raised sector adjacent to the central depression. Fig. 73: Girdle view of a specimen with highly elevated polar pseudocelli. Note the offset of the polar elevations from the valve margin. Fig. 74: Oblique view of a specimen with attached valvocopula. Note clasping devices indicated by arrows. Fig. 75: Detail of the valvocopula attachment, with two clasping devices embracing internal costae visible. Arrow indicates the fossa, attached to the inwardly expanded hyaline margin of the mantle.	2015-05-26	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.		Zenodo	biologists	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.			
ED69878E096CFB11FF2FF8CDFCE923D0.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/13637870/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13637870	FIGURES 76–81. Light micrographs showing the range of morphological variation in Entogoniopsis novazealandica. Fig. 76: BM63524, Oamaru, New Zealand. Fig. 77: BM71533, Oamaru, New Zealand, lectotype; Fig. 78: BM46607, Oamaru, New Zealand. Fig. 79: BM coll. Adams G116, Jackson’s Paddock, Oamaru, New Zealand. Fig. 80: BM coll. Adams G659, labelled ‘(J.G.) Oamaru, New Zealand’. Fig. 81: BM46575, Oamaru, New Zealand.	FIGURES 76–81. Light micrographs showing the range of morphological variation in Entogoniopsis novazealandica. Fig. 76: BM63524, Oamaru, New Zealand. Fig. 77: BM71533, Oamaru, New Zealand, lectotype; Fig. 78: BM46607, Oamaru, New Zealand. Fig. 79: BM coll. Adams G116, Jackson’s Paddock, Oamaru, New Zealand. Fig. 80: BM coll. Adams G659, labelled ‘(J.G.) Oamaru, New Zealand’. Fig. 81: BM46575, Oamaru, New Zealand.	2015-05-26	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.		Zenodo	biologists	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.			
ED69878E096CFB11FF2FF8CDFCE923D0.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/13637872/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13637872	FIGURES 82–86. Triceratium dobreeanum Norman ex Greville versus Triceratium dobreeanum var. novazealandica Grove & Sturt. Figs 82–83: Line drawings of Triceratium dobreeanum Norman ex Greville, reproduced from Greville (1865a: pl. II, Figs 23–24). Fig. 84: Light micrograph of T. dobreeanum holotype, BM3340, dredging off Sydney, Australia. Figs 85–86: Line drawings of Triceratium dobreeanum var. novazealandica, reproduced from Grove & Sturt (1886: pl. XIX, Figs 17–18); note the lack of linking spines at the summits of the polar elevations. Reproductions are not to scale.	FIGURES 82–86. Triceratium dobreeanum Norman ex Greville versus Triceratium dobreeanum var. novazealandica Grove & Sturt. Figs 82–83: Line drawings of Triceratium dobreeanum Norman ex Greville, reproduced from Greville (1865a: pl. II, Figs 23–24). Fig. 84: Light micrograph of T. dobreeanum holotype, BM3340, dredging off Sydney, Australia. Figs 85–86: Line drawings of Triceratium dobreeanum var. novazealandica, reproduced from Grove & Sturt (1886: pl. XIX, Figs 17–18); note the lack of linking spines at the summits of the polar elevations. Reproductions are not to scale.	2015-05-26	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.		Zenodo	biologists	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.			
ED69878E096EFB0CFF2FFE37FE7D2733.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/13637855/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13637855	FIGURES 37–43. Scanning electron micrographs of Entogoniopsis polycistinora from Kamyshlov, Russia (Figs 37, 39–43), and Kirgizskoe, Kazakhstan (Fig. 38). Fig. 37: Oblique external view. Location of the ring of rimoportulae indicated by the white arrowhead. Note spinules at the distal faces of the pseudocelli (white arrow). Black arrowhead indicates coarse areolae, and black arrow shows fine areolae in between rows of coarse ones. Fig. 38: Oblique external view of a specimen with a stepped mantle (arrow). Rimoportulae indicated by arrowhead. Fig. 39: Oblique internal view of a specimen with a ring of 14 rimoportulae located on a prominent central area (arrowhead). Fig. 40: Specimen in girdle view. Note the low relative height of the polar elevations, and the location of the hyaline marginal ridge (arrow). Fig. 41: Detail of a fractured valve revealing Tshaped cross-sections of the internal costae (arrowhead). Fig. 42: Detail of the specimen in Fig. 37, showing fractured buttressed external tubes of the rimoportulae. Fig. 43: Detail of the specimen in Fig. 39, showing internal openings of the rimoportulae, in the form of slits across slightly raised papillae. Note well-preserved volae (arrowhead).	FIGURES 37–43. Scanning electron micrographs of Entogoniopsis polycistinora from Kamyshlov, Russia (Figs 37, 39–43), and Kirgizskoe, Kazakhstan (Fig. 38). Fig. 37: Oblique external view. Location of the ring of rimoportulae indicated by the white arrowhead. Note spinules at the distal faces of the pseudocelli (white arrow). Black arrowhead indicates coarse areolae, and black arrow shows fine areolae in between rows of coarse ones. Fig. 38: Oblique external view of a specimen with a stepped mantle (arrow). Rimoportulae indicated by arrowhead. Fig. 39: Oblique internal view of a specimen with a ring of 14 rimoportulae located on a prominent central area (arrowhead). Fig. 40: Specimen in girdle view. Note the low relative height of the polar elevations, and the location of the hyaline marginal ridge (arrow). Fig. 41: Detail of a fractured valve revealing Tshaped cross-sections of the internal costae (arrowhead). Fig. 42: Detail of the specimen in Fig. 37, showing fractured buttressed external tubes of the rimoportulae. Fig. 43: Detail of the specimen in Fig. 39, showing internal openings of the rimoportulae, in the form of slits across slightly raised papillae. Note well-preserved volae (arrowhead).	2015-05-26	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.		Zenodo	biologists	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.			
ED69878E096EFB0CFF2FFE37FE7D2733.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/13637858/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13637858	FIGURES 44–49. Light micrographs showing the range of morphological variation in Entogoniopsis polycistinora. Fig. 44: BM66536, Kamyshlov, Russia. Fig. 45: BM coll. Adams TS748, Kamyshlov, Russia. Fig. 46: BM63692, Kamyshlov, Russia. Fig. 47: BM63691, Kamyshlov, Russia. Fig. 48: BM63693, Barbadoes. Fig. 49: BM61201, Kusnetzk, Russia.	FIGURES 44–49. Light micrographs showing the range of morphological variation in Entogoniopsis polycistinora. Fig. 44: BM66536, Kamyshlov, Russia. Fig. 45: BM coll. Adams TS748, Kamyshlov, Russia. Fig. 46: BM63692, Kamyshlov, Russia. Fig. 47: BM63691, Kamyshlov, Russia. Fig. 48: BM63693, Barbadoes. Fig. 49: BM61201, Kusnetzk, Russia.	2015-05-26	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.		Zenodo	biologists	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.			
ED69878E096EFB0CFF2FFE37FE7D2733.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/13637860/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13637860	FIGURES 50–51. Fig. 50: Reproduction of the line drawing of Entogonia saratoviana from Pantocsek (1889: pl. VI, fig. 105), not to scale. Fig. 51: Light micrograph of Triceratium reedii (Reed) Desikachary & Sreelatha, holotype, Forrester’s, Oamaru, New Zealand, slide CHR617491 (coll. Allan Herbarium, Landcare Research, New Zealand).	FIGURES 50–51. Fig. 50: Reproduction of the line drawing of Entogonia saratoviana from Pantocsek (1889: pl. VI, fig. 105), not to scale. Fig. 51: Light micrograph of Triceratium reedii (Reed) Desikachary & Sreelatha, holotype, Forrester’s, Oamaru, New Zealand, slide CHR617491 (coll. Allan Herbarium, Landcare Research, New Zealand).	2015-05-26	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.		Zenodo	biologists	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.			
ED69878E097FFB1CFF2FFC46FC5B26C8.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/13637924/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13637924	FIGURES 212–216. Light micrographs of some of the new combinations proposed in this study. Fig. 212: BM63525, Entogoniopsis dutertrei, Kusnetzk, Russia. Fig. 213: BM37991, Entogoniopsis pseudonervata, Oamaru, New Zealand. Fig. 214: ANSP slide SchAR3461, Entogoniopsis curvinervia, Barbadoes, holotype. Micrograph by Jennifer Beals. Fig. 215: BM63762, Entogoniopsis curvicostata, Joe’s River, Barbadoes (label reads: ‘Triceratium pallidum’). Fig. 216: BM37989, Entogoniopsis truncata, Springfield, Barbadoes.	FIGURES 212–216. Light micrographs of some of the new combinations proposed in this study. Fig. 212: BM63525, Entogoniopsis dutertrei, Kusnetzk, Russia. Fig. 213: BM37991, Entogoniopsis pseudonervata, Oamaru, New Zealand. Fig. 214: ANSP slide SchAR3461, Entogoniopsis curvinervia, Barbadoes, holotype. Micrograph by Jennifer Beals. Fig. 215: BM63762, Entogoniopsis curvicostata, Joe’s River, Barbadoes (label reads: ‘Triceratium pallidum’). Fig. 216: BM37989, Entogoniopsis truncata, Springfield, Barbadoes.	2015-05-26	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.		Zenodo	biologists	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.			
ED69878E0970FB12FF2FFD44FEDB267E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/13637882/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13637882	FIGURES 108–113. Scanning electron micrographs of Entogoniopsis squamata from dredging DODO-123-D1, Mascarene Ridge, Indian Ocean. Fig. 108: Oblique external view, showing the conspicuously depressed valve face. Note the rows of areolae on the mantle becoming slightly divergent closer to the poles. Fig. 109: Oblique internal view, showing the depressed valve face and rows of marginal internal costae. Note the sparser areolation within the central area (arrow). Fig. 110: Valve (V) with attached valvocopula (VC) in girdle view. Note the hyaline marginal ridge level with the summits of the polar elevations (arrow). Fig. 111: Detail of the specimen in Fig. 109, showing the pattern of loops (‘scales’ in Pantocsek’s description) formed by the internal costae, and the inwardly expanded hyaline mantle margin. Fig. 112: Oblique internal view of the specimen in Fig. 110, showing the valvocopula attached to the valve by means of clasping devices embracing the internal costae (arrow). Fig. 113: Detail of the specimen in Fig. 110, showing arrowhead-shaped clasping devices.	FIGURES 108–113. Scanning electron micrographs of Entogoniopsis squamata from dredging DODO-123-D1, Mascarene Ridge, Indian Ocean. Fig. 108: Oblique external view, showing the conspicuously depressed valve face. Note the rows of areolae on the mantle becoming slightly divergent closer to the poles. Fig. 109: Oblique internal view, showing the depressed valve face and rows of marginal internal costae. Note the sparser areolation within the central area (arrow). Fig. 110: Valve (V) with attached valvocopula (VC) in girdle view. Note the hyaline marginal ridge level with the summits of the polar elevations (arrow). Fig. 111: Detail of the specimen in Fig. 109, showing the pattern of loops (‘scales’ in Pantocsek’s description) formed by the internal costae, and the inwardly expanded hyaline mantle margin. Fig. 112: Oblique internal view of the specimen in Fig. 110, showing the valvocopula attached to the valve by means of clasping devices embracing the internal costae (arrow). Fig. 113: Detail of the specimen in Fig. 110, showing arrowhead-shaped clasping devices.	2015-05-26	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.		Zenodo	biologists	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.			
ED69878E0970FB12FF2FFD44FEDB267E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/13637884/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13637884	FIGURES 114–116. Light micrographs showing the range of morphological variation in Entogoniopsis squamata. Fig. 114: BM coll. Adams H335, Kusnetzk, Russia. Fig. 115: BM coll. Adams GC3416, Barbadoes. Fig. 116: BM101699, dredging DODO-123-D1, Mascarene Ridge, Indian Ocean.	FIGURES 114–116. Light micrographs showing the range of morphological variation in Entogoniopsis squamata. Fig. 114: BM coll. Adams H335, Kusnetzk, Russia. Fig. 115: BM coll. Adams GC3416, Barbadoes. Fig. 116: BM101699, dredging DODO-123-D1, Mascarene Ridge, Indian Ocean.	2015-05-26	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.		Zenodo	biologists	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.			
ED69878E0970FB12FF2FFD44FEDB267E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/13637886/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13637886	FIGURES 117–119. Reproductions of original line drawings from Pantocsek (1889). Fig. 117: Entogonia tschestnovii Pantocsek (1889: pl. II, fig. 24). Fig. 118: Triceratium squamatum Pantocsek (1889: pl. IX, fig. 164). Fig. 119: Entogonia truanii Pantocsek (1889: pl. XIII, fig. 223). Relative scale retained.	FIGURES 117–119. Reproductions of original line drawings from Pantocsek (1889). Fig. 117: Entogonia tschestnovii Pantocsek (1889: pl. II, fig. 24). Fig. 118: Triceratium squamatum Pantocsek (1889: pl. IX, fig. 164). Fig. 119: Entogonia truanii Pantocsek (1889: pl. XIII, fig. 223). Relative scale retained.	2015-05-26	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.		Zenodo	biologists	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.			
ED69878E0971FB15FF2FFB25FA762336.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/13637888/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13637888	FIGURES 120–124. Scanning electron micrographs of Entogoniopsis squamatoportulata from Vema Cruise 17, Core 107, South Atlantic Ocean. Fig. 120: Internal valve view, showing the location of the central ring of 17 rimoportulae (arrow). Fig. 121: Detail of the specimen in Fig. 120, showing the internal openings of the rimoportulae in the form of short slits across slightly raised papillae. Fig. 122: Oblique internal view, showing the depressed centre of the valve face, and the complex pattern of internal costae in the marginal part of the valve face and on the mantle. Fig. 123: Detail of the prominent pseudocellus. Note the well-preserved volae within the areolae. Fig. 124: Detail of the pattern formed by the internal costae. Note the inwardly expanded, smooth hyaline margin of the mantle (arrow).	FIGURES 120–124. Scanning electron micrographs of Entogoniopsis squamatoportulata from Vema Cruise 17, Core 107, South Atlantic Ocean. Fig. 120: Internal valve view, showing the location of the central ring of 17 rimoportulae (arrow). Fig. 121: Detail of the specimen in Fig. 120, showing the internal openings of the rimoportulae in the form of short slits across slightly raised papillae. Fig. 122: Oblique internal view, showing the depressed centre of the valve face, and the complex pattern of internal costae in the marginal part of the valve face and on the mantle. Fig. 123: Detail of the prominent pseudocellus. Note the well-preserved volae within the areolae. Fig. 124: Detail of the pattern formed by the internal costae. Note the inwardly expanded, smooth hyaline margin of the mantle (arrow).	2015-05-26	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.		Zenodo	biologists	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.			
ED69878E0971FB15FF2FFB25FA762336.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/13637890/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13637890	FIGURES 125–127. Light micrographs showing the range of morphological variation in Entogoniopsis squamatoportulata. Figs 125–126: SZCZ22057, DSDP sample 29-281-16CC, South Tasman Rise, Southwest Pacific Ocean. Fig. 127: SZCZ21078, holotype, DSDP sample 29-281-16-3, 75–77 cm, South Tasman Rise, Southwest Pacific Ocean.	FIGURES 125–127. Light micrographs showing the range of morphological variation in Entogoniopsis squamatoportulata. Figs 125–126: SZCZ22057, DSDP sample 29-281-16CC, South Tasman Rise, Southwest Pacific Ocean. Fig. 127: SZCZ21078, holotype, DSDP sample 29-281-16-3, 75–77 cm, South Tasman Rise, Southwest Pacific Ocean.	2015-05-26	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.		Zenodo	biologists	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.			
ED69878E0977FB16FF2FFCA2FF122388.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/13637900/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13637900	FIGURES 149–154. Scanning electron micrographs of Entogoniopsis stokesiana from Pôtor (formerly Szent-Péter), Slovakia (Figs 149, 153–154) and Szurdokpüspöki (‘Castel’), Hungary (150–152). Fig. 149: Oblique external view, showing a trifolium in the centre of the valve face. The central ring of rimoportulae is indicated with an arrowhead. Note the deep, stepped mantle (arrow). Fig. 150: Oblique internal view of a valve with four internal costae per side. Note that the more prominent costae are associated with the edges of the trifolium (arrows). The location of the rimoportulae is indicated with an arrowhead. Fig. 151: Detail of the central area, showing the external tubes of the rimoportulae bearing thickened rims, and granules scattered on the valve face (arrow). Note the well-preserved slightly sunken cribra, and the diminished size of areolae next to the rimoportulae. Fig. 152: Detail of the specimen in Fig. 150, showing the internal openings of the rimoportulae, in the form of a slit between slightly raised lips. Note the smaller areolae located next to the rimoportulae, and the well-preserved cribra. Fig. 153: Detail of a pseudocellus. Fig. 154: Oblique external view of a specimen with a detached girdle element, probably a copula (C?).	FIGURES 149–154. Scanning electron micrographs of Entogoniopsis stokesiana from Pôtor (formerly Szent-Péter), Slovakia (Figs 149, 153–154) and Szurdokpüspöki (‘Castel’), Hungary (150–152). Fig. 149: Oblique external view, showing a trifolium in the centre of the valve face. The central ring of rimoportulae is indicated with an arrowhead. Note the deep, stepped mantle (arrow). Fig. 150: Oblique internal view of a valve with four internal costae per side. Note that the more prominent costae are associated with the edges of the trifolium (arrows). The location of the rimoportulae is indicated with an arrowhead. Fig. 151: Detail of the central area, showing the external tubes of the rimoportulae bearing thickened rims, and granules scattered on the valve face (arrow). Note the well-preserved slightly sunken cribra, and the diminished size of areolae next to the rimoportulae. Fig. 152: Detail of the specimen in Fig. 150, showing the internal openings of the rimoportulae, in the form of a slit between slightly raised lips. Note the smaller areolae located next to the rimoportulae, and the well-preserved cribra. Fig. 153: Detail of a pseudocellus. Fig. 154: Oblique external view of a specimen with a detached girdle element, probably a copula (C?).	2015-05-26	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.		Zenodo	biologists	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.			
ED69878E0977FB16FF2FFCA2FF122388.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/13637902/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13637902	FIGURES 155–160. Light micrographs showing the range of morphological variation in Entogoniopsis stokesiana. Figs 155 and 160: BM63749, Hungary. Figs 156–157: BM63751, Szakal, Hungary. Note valve face thickenings indicated by arrowheads in Fig. 156. Fig. 158: BM63750, Hungary. Fig. 159: BM coll. Adams TS741, Castel, Hungary.	FIGURES 155–160. Light micrographs showing the range of morphological variation in Entogoniopsis stokesiana. Figs 155 and 160: BM63749, Hungary. Figs 156–157: BM63751, Szakal, Hungary. Note valve face thickenings indicated by arrowheads in Fig. 156. Fig. 158: BM63750, Hungary. Fig. 159: BM coll. Adams TS741, Castel, Hungary.	2015-05-26	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.		Zenodo	biologists	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.			
ED69878E0978FB1AFF2FFF17FDF12497.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/13637920/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13637920	FIGURES 193–198. Scanning electron micrographs of Entogoniopsis tabellaria from Joe’s River (Figs 193, 195) and Conset (Fig. 197), Barbadoes, and Maria Madre Island, Mexico (Figs 194, 196, 198). Fig. 193: Oblique external view of a specimen with convex summits of the polar elevations. Note the well-preserved domed vela. Arrowhead points to the inconspicuous hyaline marginal ridge. Arrow indicates the slight outward expansion of the hyaline mantle margin. Fig. 194: Oblique external view of a specimen with flat summits of the polar elevations, and displaced girdle elements preserved. Fig. 195: Detail of the specimen in Fig. 193, showing well-preserved rotae within the porelli of the pseudocellus, and domed cribra occluding the areolae. Fig. 196: Detail of the specimen in Fig. 194, showing a detail of the polar pseudocellus, distinctly cut off from the adjacent depressed sector, and the detached girdle elements, which likely represent copulae (C and C?). Fig. 197: Oblique internal view, showing the internal costae and the inwardly expanded mantle margin (arrowhead). Fig. 198: Internal view of a specimen with attached valvocopula (VC), and a preserved displaced copula (C). Arrowhead points to one of the clasping devices linking the valvocopula to the internal costae.	FIGURES 193–198. Scanning electron micrographs of Entogoniopsis tabellaria from Joe’s River (Figs 193, 195) and Conset (Fig. 197), Barbadoes, and Maria Madre Island, Mexico (Figs 194, 196, 198). Fig. 193: Oblique external view of a specimen with convex summits of the polar elevations. Note the well-preserved domed vela. Arrowhead points to the inconspicuous hyaline marginal ridge. Arrow indicates the slight outward expansion of the hyaline mantle margin. Fig. 194: Oblique external view of a specimen with flat summits of the polar elevations, and displaced girdle elements preserved. Fig. 195: Detail of the specimen in Fig. 193, showing well-preserved rotae within the porelli of the pseudocellus, and domed cribra occluding the areolae. Fig. 196: Detail of the specimen in Fig. 194, showing a detail of the polar pseudocellus, distinctly cut off from the adjacent depressed sector, and the detached girdle elements, which likely represent copulae (C and C?). Fig. 197: Oblique internal view, showing the internal costae and the inwardly expanded mantle margin (arrowhead). Fig. 198: Internal view of a specimen with attached valvocopula (VC), and a preserved displaced copula (C). Arrowhead points to one of the clasping devices linking the valvocopula to the internal costae.	2015-05-26	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.		Zenodo	biologists	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.			
ED69878E0978FB1AFF2FFF17FDF12497.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/13638004/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13638004	FIGURES 199–204. Light micrographs showing the range of morphological variation in Entogoniopsis tabellaria. Figs 199, 201: BM63765, Manila, Philippine Islands. Fig. 200: BM63761, Colón, Panama. Fig. 202: BM coll. Adams TS543, Jérémie, Haiti (label on slide: ‘Triceratium grave’). Fig. 203: BM coll. Adams TS451, Tamatave, Madagascar (label on slide: ‘T. grave’). Fig. 204: BM coll. Adams TS582, Maria Madre Island, Mexico (slide label reads: ‘Biddulphia riedyi’).	FIGURES 199–204. Light micrographs showing the range of morphological variation in Entogoniopsis tabellaria. Figs 199, 201: BM63765, Manila, Philippine Islands. Fig. 200: BM63761, Colón, Panama. Fig. 202: BM coll. Adams TS543, Jérémie, Haiti (label on slide: ‘Triceratium grave’). Fig. 203: BM coll. Adams TS451, Tamatave, Madagascar (label on slide: ‘T. grave’). Fig. 204: BM coll. Adams TS582, Maria Madre Island, Mexico (slide label reads: ‘Biddulphia riedyi’).	2015-05-26	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.		Zenodo	biologists	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.			
ED69878E097FFB1CFF2FFA37FF17251E.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/13637924/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13637924	FIGURES 212–216. Light micrographs of some of the new combinations proposed in this study. Fig. 212: BM63525, Entogoniopsis dutertrei, Kusnetzk, Russia. Fig. 213: BM37991, Entogoniopsis pseudonervata, Oamaru, New Zealand. Fig. 214: ANSP slide SchAR3461, Entogoniopsis curvinervia, Barbadoes, holotype. Micrograph by Jennifer Beals. Fig. 215: BM63762, Entogoniopsis curvicostata, Joe’s River, Barbadoes (label reads: ‘Triceratium pallidum’). Fig. 216: BM37989, Entogoniopsis truncata, Springfield, Barbadoes.	FIGURES 212–216. Light micrographs of some of the new combinations proposed in this study. Fig. 212: BM63525, Entogoniopsis dutertrei, Kusnetzk, Russia. Fig. 213: BM37991, Entogoniopsis pseudonervata, Oamaru, New Zealand. Fig. 214: ANSP slide SchAR3461, Entogoniopsis curvinervia, Barbadoes, holotype. Micrograph by Jennifer Beals. Fig. 215: BM63762, Entogoniopsis curvicostata, Joe’s River, Barbadoes (label reads: ‘Triceratium pallidum’). Fig. 216: BM37989, Entogoniopsis truncata, Springfield, Barbadoes.	2015-05-26	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.		Zenodo	biologists	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.			
ED69878E096FFB0FFF2FFAE2FC36251D.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/13637862/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13637862	FIGURES 52–57. Scanning electron micrographs of Entogoniopsis venosa from Joe’s River, Barbadoes (Figs 52, 54, 56), and Oamaru, New Zealand (Figs 53, 55, 57). Fig. 52: Oblique external view, central rimoportula indicated by arrow. Fig. 53: Oblique internal view. Note the internal opening of the rimoportula indicated by arrow. Fig. 54: Detail of the specimen in Fig. 52, showing a small depression around the fractured external tube of the rimoportula. Fig. 55: Detail of the specimen in Fig. 53, showing the internal opening of the rimoportula in the form of a slightly raised slit. Note the prominent costae radiating from the rimoportula. Fig. 56: Detail of the specimen in Fig. 52, showing the hyaline marginal ridge, and the mantle, with external thickenings on the part adjacent to the valve face, associated with the internal costae (arrows). Fig. 57: Detail of the specimen in Fig. 53, showing the internal costae and the hyaline mantle margin, with a slight inward expansion.	FIGURES 52–57. Scanning electron micrographs of Entogoniopsis venosa from Joe’s River, Barbadoes (Figs 52, 54, 56), and Oamaru, New Zealand (Figs 53, 55, 57). Fig. 52: Oblique external view, central rimoportula indicated by arrow. Fig. 53: Oblique internal view. Note the internal opening of the rimoportula indicated by arrow. Fig. 54: Detail of the specimen in Fig. 52, showing a small depression around the fractured external tube of the rimoportula. Fig. 55: Detail of the specimen in Fig. 53, showing the internal opening of the rimoportula in the form of a slightly raised slit. Note the prominent costae radiating from the rimoportula. Fig. 56: Detail of the specimen in Fig. 52, showing the hyaline marginal ridge, and the mantle, with external thickenings on the part adjacent to the valve face, associated with the internal costae (arrows). Fig. 57: Detail of the specimen in Fig. 53, showing the internal costae and the hyaline mantle margin, with a slight inward expansion.	2015-05-26	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.		Zenodo	biologists	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.			
ED69878E096FFB0FFF2FFAE2FC36251D.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/13637866/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13637866	FIGURES 58–68. Light micrographs showing the range of morphological variation in Entogoniopsis venosa. Fig. 58: BM63792, Joe’s River, Barbadoes. Fig. 59: BM35040, Barbadoes. Fig. 60: BM68793, Barbadoes. Fig. 61: BM63791, Newcastle, Barbadoes. Fig. 62: BM coll. Adams TS856, Joe’s River, Barbadoes. Fig. 63: BM11107, Oamaru, New Zealand. Fig. 64: BM68793, Oamaru. Fig. 65: BM coll. Adams TS315, Oamaru. Arrow indicates a missing segment within a costa. Fig. 66: BM68793, Barbadoes. Fig. 67: BM38108, Springfield, Barbadoes. Fig. 68: ODP sample 171B-1050A-2H-2, 33–34 cm, Blake Nose, western North Atlantic Ocean.	FIGURES 58–68. Light micrographs showing the range of morphological variation in Entogoniopsis venosa. Fig. 58: BM63792, Joe’s River, Barbadoes. Fig. 59: BM35040, Barbadoes. Fig. 60: BM68793, Barbadoes. Fig. 61: BM63791, Newcastle, Barbadoes. Fig. 62: BM coll. Adams TS856, Joe’s River, Barbadoes. Fig. 63: BM11107, Oamaru, New Zealand. Fig. 64: BM68793, Oamaru. Fig. 65: BM coll. Adams TS315, Oamaru. Arrow indicates a missing segment within a costa. Fig. 66: BM68793, Barbadoes. Fig. 67: BM38108, Springfield, Barbadoes. Fig. 68: ODP sample 171B-1050A-2H-2, 33–34 cm, Blake Nose, western North Atlantic Ocean.	2015-05-26	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.		Zenodo	biologists	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.			
ED69878E096FFB0FFF2FFAE2FC36251D.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/13637855/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13637855	FIGURES 37–43. Scanning electron micrographs of Entogoniopsis polycistinora from Kamyshlov, Russia (Figs 37, 39–43), and Kirgizskoe, Kazakhstan (Fig. 38). Fig. 37: Oblique external view. Location of the ring of rimoportulae indicated by the white arrowhead. Note spinules at the distal faces of the pseudocelli (white arrow). Black arrowhead indicates coarse areolae, and black arrow shows fine areolae in between rows of coarse ones. Fig. 38: Oblique external view of a specimen with a stepped mantle (arrow). Rimoportulae indicated by arrowhead. Fig. 39: Oblique internal view of a specimen with a ring of 14 rimoportulae located on a prominent central area (arrowhead). Fig. 40: Specimen in girdle view. Note the low relative height of the polar elevations, and the location of the hyaline marginal ridge (arrow). Fig. 41: Detail of a fractured valve revealing Tshaped cross-sections of the internal costae (arrowhead). Fig. 42: Detail of the specimen in Fig. 37, showing fractured buttressed external tubes of the rimoportulae. Fig. 43: Detail of the specimen in Fig. 39, showing internal openings of the rimoportulae, in the form of slits across slightly raised papillae. Note well-preserved volae (arrowhead).	FIGURES 37–43. Scanning electron micrographs of Entogoniopsis polycistinora from Kamyshlov, Russia (Figs 37, 39–43), and Kirgizskoe, Kazakhstan (Fig. 38). Fig. 37: Oblique external view. Location of the ring of rimoportulae indicated by the white arrowhead. Note spinules at the distal faces of the pseudocelli (white arrow). Black arrowhead indicates coarse areolae, and black arrow shows fine areolae in between rows of coarse ones. Fig. 38: Oblique external view of a specimen with a stepped mantle (arrow). Rimoportulae indicated by arrowhead. Fig. 39: Oblique internal view of a specimen with a ring of 14 rimoportulae located on a prominent central area (arrowhead). Fig. 40: Specimen in girdle view. Note the low relative height of the polar elevations, and the location of the hyaline marginal ridge (arrow). Fig. 41: Detail of a fractured valve revealing Tshaped cross-sections of the internal costae (arrowhead). Fig. 42: Detail of the specimen in Fig. 37, showing fractured buttressed external tubes of the rimoportulae. Fig. 43: Detail of the specimen in Fig. 39, showing internal openings of the rimoportulae, in the form of slits across slightly raised papillae. Note well-preserved volae (arrowhead).	2015-05-26	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.		Zenodo	biologists	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.			
ED69878E0979FB1DFF2FF946FE8521AC.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/13637922/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13637922	FIGURES 205–211. Scanning electron micrographs of Entogoniopsis? sp. from Szurdokpüspöki (‘Castel’), Hungary. Fig. 205: Oblique external view of a short chain. Note the prominent, curved linking spine preserved on the lower pole (arrow), and the lack of external openings of the rimoportulae within the central area. VC: valvocopula, C: copula. Fig. 206: Internal view of the central area, showing the internal openings of the rimoportulae. Fig. 207: Oblique internal view of the sibling valve, showing the location of the rimoportulae within the central area (arrowhead), and a series of prominent internal costae along the valve margin (arrow). Fig. 208: Detail of the poles, tightly linked by hooked linking spines. Fig. 209: Girdle view of a short chain showing additional interlocking linking devices along the crest of the marginal ridge (arrows). Note that the valve to the right of the micrograph differs in structure of the marginal ridge. Arrowhead indicates polar linking spines. Fig. 210: Detail of the sibling valves, showing the interlocking linking devices along the crest of the marginal ridge. Fig. 211: Detail of a polar elevation, showing a cross-section through a fractured spine (arrowhead).	FIGURES 205–211. Scanning electron micrographs of Entogoniopsis? sp. from Szurdokpüspöki (‘Castel’), Hungary. Fig. 205: Oblique external view of a short chain. Note the prominent, curved linking spine preserved on the lower pole (arrow), and the lack of external openings of the rimoportulae within the central area. VC: valvocopula, C: copula. Fig. 206: Internal view of the central area, showing the internal openings of the rimoportulae. Fig. 207: Oblique internal view of the sibling valve, showing the location of the rimoportulae within the central area (arrowhead), and a series of prominent internal costae along the valve margin (arrow). Fig. 208: Detail of the poles, tightly linked by hooked linking spines. Fig. 209: Girdle view of a short chain showing additional interlocking linking devices along the crest of the marginal ridge (arrows). Note that the valve to the right of the micrograph differs in structure of the marginal ridge. Arrowhead indicates polar linking spines. Fig. 210: Detail of the sibling valves, showing the interlocking linking devices along the crest of the marginal ridge. Fig. 211: Detail of a polar elevation, showing a cross-section through a fractured spine (arrowhead).	2015-05-26	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.		Zenodo	biologists	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.			
ED69878E097CFB1EFF2FFC65FC06212B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/13637926/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13637926	FIGURES 217–222. Scanning electron micrographs of Trilamina nitescens from Oamaru, New Zealand. Fig. 217: Oblique external view of a valve with attached valvocopula (VC). Fig. 218: Detail of the specimen in Fig. 217, showing the hyaline depressed sectors next to the valve centre. Arrow points to a poroid which might represent an external opening of a rimoportula. Fig. 219: Detail of the specimen in Fig. 217, showing the inconspicuous polar pseudocellus (arrowhead). Fig. 220: Flat internal view of a specimen with an attached valvocopula. Internal opening of the rimoportula is indicated by the white arrow. Arrowhead points to the prominent, tapering costa on the underside of the depressed area. Black arrow indicates the costa associated with the margin of the valve centre. Fig. 221: Oblique internal view of the specimen in Fig. 220, showing the differentiated clasping devices on the valvocopula. Large clasping mechanism is indicated by the arrowhead; small clasping mechanism is indicated by the white arrow. Note that the possible pseudocelli are bound by costae on the interior (black arrows). Fig. 222: Detail of the small clasping devices attached to the internal costae in the distal part of one of the projections.	FIGURES 217–222. Scanning electron micrographs of Trilamina nitescens from Oamaru, New Zealand. Fig. 217: Oblique external view of a valve with attached valvocopula (VC). Fig. 218: Detail of the specimen in Fig. 217, showing the hyaline depressed sectors next to the valve centre. Arrow points to a poroid which might represent an external opening of a rimoportula. Fig. 219: Detail of the specimen in Fig. 217, showing the inconspicuous polar pseudocellus (arrowhead). Fig. 220: Flat internal view of a specimen with an attached valvocopula. Internal opening of the rimoportula is indicated by the white arrow. Arrowhead points to the prominent, tapering costa on the underside of the depressed area. Black arrow indicates the costa associated with the margin of the valve centre. Fig. 221: Oblique internal view of the specimen in Fig. 220, showing the differentiated clasping devices on the valvocopula. Large clasping mechanism is indicated by the arrowhead; small clasping mechanism is indicated by the white arrow. Note that the possible pseudocelli are bound by costae on the interior (black arrows). Fig. 222: Detail of the small clasping devices attached to the internal costae in the distal part of one of the projections.	2015-05-26	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.		Zenodo	biologists	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.			
ED69878E097CFB1EFF2FFC65FC06212B.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/13637928/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13637928	FIGURES 223–229. Light micrographs showing the range of morphological variation in Trilamina nitescens. Fig. 223: BM63659, Joe’s River, Barbadoes. Fig. 224: BM coll. Adams TS694, frustule, Oamaru, New Zealand. Fig. 225: BM63658, Oamaru, New Zealand. Figs 226–227: BM coll. Adams GC3332, Oamaru, New Zealand. Fig. 228: BM3198, Cambridge, Barbadoes, holotype. Fig. 229: BM61164, Oamaru, New Zealand.	FIGURES 223–229. Light micrographs showing the range of morphological variation in Trilamina nitescens. Fig. 223: BM63659, Joe’s River, Barbadoes. Fig. 224: BM coll. Adams TS694, frustule, Oamaru, New Zealand. Fig. 225: BM63658, Oamaru, New Zealand. Figs 226–227: BM coll. Adams GC3332, Oamaru, New Zealand. Fig. 228: BM3198, Cambridge, Barbadoes, holotype. Fig. 229: BM61164, Oamaru, New Zealand.	2015-05-26	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.		Zenodo	biologists	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.			
ED69878E0943FB20FF2FFAA4FD752402.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/13637938/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13637938	FIGURES 249–252. Light micrographs of some of the new combinations proposed in this study. Fig. 249: BM63779, Trilamina tripes, Joe’s River, Barbadoes. Fig. 250: BM2763, Trilamina denticulata, Cambridge, Barbadoes, holotype. Slide thickness prevents Köhler illumination. Fig. 251: BM2111, Trilamina rotundata, Barbadoes, holotype. Slide thickness prevents Köhler illumination. Fig. 252: BM3078, Trilamina obesa, Cambridge, Barbadoes, holotype.	FIGURES 249–252. Light micrographs of some of the new combinations proposed in this study. Fig. 249: BM63779, Trilamina tripes, Joe’s River, Barbadoes. Fig. 250: BM2763, Trilamina denticulata, Cambridge, Barbadoes, holotype. Slide thickness prevents Köhler illumination. Fig. 251: BM2111, Trilamina rotundata, Barbadoes, holotype. Slide thickness prevents Köhler illumination. Fig. 252: BM3078, Trilamina obesa, Cambridge, Barbadoes, holotype.	2015-05-26	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.		Zenodo	biologists	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.			
ED69878E0943FB20FF2FF9AEFCF024EE.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/13637938/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13637938	FIGURES 249–252. Light micrographs of some of the new combinations proposed in this study. Fig. 249: BM63779, Trilamina tripes, Joe’s River, Barbadoes. Fig. 250: BM2763, Trilamina denticulata, Cambridge, Barbadoes, holotype. Slide thickness prevents Köhler illumination. Fig. 251: BM2111, Trilamina rotundata, Barbadoes, holotype. Slide thickness prevents Köhler illumination. Fig. 252: BM3078, Trilamina obesa, Cambridge, Barbadoes, holotype.	FIGURES 249–252. Light micrographs of some of the new combinations proposed in this study. Fig. 249: BM63779, Trilamina tripes, Joe’s River, Barbadoes. Fig. 250: BM2763, Trilamina denticulata, Cambridge, Barbadoes, holotype. Slide thickness prevents Köhler illumination. Fig. 251: BM2111, Trilamina rotundata, Barbadoes, holotype. Slide thickness prevents Köhler illumination. Fig. 252: BM3078, Trilamina obesa, Cambridge, Barbadoes, holotype.	2015-05-26	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.		Zenodo	biologists	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.			
ED69878E0943FB23FF2FF89AFBB922D5.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/13637938/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13637938	FIGURES 249–252. Light micrographs of some of the new combinations proposed in this study. Fig. 249: BM63779, Trilamina tripes, Joe’s River, Barbadoes. Fig. 250: BM2763, Trilamina denticulata, Cambridge, Barbadoes, holotype. Slide thickness prevents Köhler illumination. Fig. 251: BM2111, Trilamina rotundata, Barbadoes, holotype. Slide thickness prevents Köhler illumination. Fig. 252: BM3078, Trilamina obesa, Cambridge, Barbadoes, holotype.	FIGURES 249–252. Light micrographs of some of the new combinations proposed in this study. Fig. 249: BM63779, Trilamina tripes, Joe’s River, Barbadoes. Fig. 250: BM2763, Trilamina denticulata, Cambridge, Barbadoes, holotype. Slide thickness prevents Köhler illumination. Fig. 251: BM2111, Trilamina rotundata, Barbadoes, holotype. Slide thickness prevents Köhler illumination. Fig. 252: BM3078, Trilamina obesa, Cambridge, Barbadoes, holotype.	2015-05-26	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.		Zenodo	biologists	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.			
ED69878E0942FB20FF2FFD44FC062172.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/13637934/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13637934	FIGURES 239–242. Scanning electron micrographs of Trilamina westiana from dredging DODO-123-D1, Mascarene Ridge, Indian Ocean. Fig. 239: Flat internal view of a specimen with an attached valvocopula. Internal opening of the rimoportula indicated by arrow. Fig. 240: Oblique internal view of the specimen in Fig. 239, showing valve face undulations, and the large clasping devices on the valvocopula (VC; arrowhead). Fig. 241: Detail of the specimen in Fig. 239, showing the areolation pattern within one of the projections. Note the poorly defined pseudocellus in the lower left corner (arrow). Fig. 242: Detail of the specimen in Fig. 239, showing the central area, with a single rimoportula located slightly off-centre (arrow).	FIGURES 239–242. Scanning electron micrographs of Trilamina westiana from dredging DODO-123-D1, Mascarene Ridge, Indian Ocean. Fig. 239: Flat internal view of a specimen with an attached valvocopula. Internal opening of the rimoportula indicated by arrow. Fig. 240: Oblique internal view of the specimen in Fig. 239, showing valve face undulations, and the large clasping devices on the valvocopula (VC; arrowhead). Fig. 241: Detail of the specimen in Fig. 239, showing the areolation pattern within one of the projections. Note the poorly defined pseudocellus in the lower left corner (arrow). Fig. 242: Detail of the specimen in Fig. 239, showing the central area, with a single rimoportula located slightly off-centre (arrow).	2015-05-26	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.		Zenodo	biologists	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.			
ED69878E0942FB20FF2FFD44FC062172.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/13637936/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13637936	FIGURES 243–248. Light micrographs showing the range of morphological variation in Trilamina westiana. Fig. 243: BM52820, Barbadoes. Slide thickness prevents Köhler illumination. Fig. 244: BM coll. Adams GC3466, Springfield, Barbadoes. Fig. 245: BM2029, Barbadoes, holotype. Slide thickness prevents Köhler illumination. Fig. 246: BM coll. Adams F1414, Barbadoes. Fig. 247: BM coll. Adams J4252, Springfield, Barbadoes. Fig. 248: BM coll. Adams F1413, Newcastle, Barbadoes.	FIGURES 243–248. Light micrographs showing the range of morphological variation in Trilamina westiana. Fig. 243: BM52820, Barbadoes. Slide thickness prevents Köhler illumination. Fig. 244: BM coll. Adams GC3466, Springfield, Barbadoes. Fig. 245: BM2029, Barbadoes, holotype. Slide thickness prevents Köhler illumination. Fig. 246: BM coll. Adams F1414, Barbadoes. Fig. 247: BM coll. Adams J4252, Springfield, Barbadoes. Fig. 248: BM coll. Adams F1413, Newcastle, Barbadoes.	2015-05-26	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.		Zenodo	biologists	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.			
ED69878E0942FB20FF2FFD44FC062172.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/13637938/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13637938	FIGURES 249–252. Light micrographs of some of the new combinations proposed in this study. Fig. 249: BM63779, Trilamina tripes, Joe’s River, Barbadoes. Fig. 250: BM2763, Trilamina denticulata, Cambridge, Barbadoes, holotype. Slide thickness prevents Köhler illumination. Fig. 251: BM2111, Trilamina rotundata, Barbadoes, holotype. Slide thickness prevents Köhler illumination. Fig. 252: BM3078, Trilamina obesa, Cambridge, Barbadoes, holotype.	FIGURES 249–252. Light micrographs of some of the new combinations proposed in this study. Fig. 249: BM63779, Trilamina tripes, Joe’s River, Barbadoes. Fig. 250: BM2763, Trilamina denticulata, Cambridge, Barbadoes, holotype. Slide thickness prevents Köhler illumination. Fig. 251: BM2111, Trilamina rotundata, Barbadoes, holotype. Slide thickness prevents Köhler illumination. Fig. 252: BM3078, Trilamina obesa, Cambridge, Barbadoes, holotype.	2015-05-26	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.		Zenodo	biologists	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.			
ED69878E097DFB21FF2FFCDCFD2F2096.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/13637930/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13637930	FIGURES 230–235. Scanning electron micrographs of Trilamina wittiana from sample AY-12, Java, Indonesia. Fig. 230: Oblique external view of a frustule with preserved valvocopulae (VC), showing the prominent, depressed hyaline areas within each projection. The fracture reveals internal costae (arrow) and the fossa. Fig. 231: Oblique internal view of a specimen with attached fractured valvocopula. A cross-section through the fossa is indicated by the arrow. Fig. 232: Detail of the distal part of a projection in a specimen with attached valvocopula (VC). Note the poorly defined pseudocellus indicated by the arrow. Fig. 233: Detail of a fractured projection revealing the clasping devices on the valvocoupla holding the remnants of internal costae (arrow). Fig. 234: Internal oblique view of a partly dissolved valve, showing clasping devices of the valvocopula (VC) attached to the internal costae (black arrows). Note the single row of poroids on the valvocopula (white arrow), adjacent to the fossa. Fig. 235: Detail of the valve interior, showing the large clasping device attached to the prominent costae along the margin of the central area (arrow).	FIGURES 230–235. Scanning electron micrographs of Trilamina wittiana from sample AY-12, Java, Indonesia. Fig. 230: Oblique external view of a frustule with preserved valvocopulae (VC), showing the prominent, depressed hyaline areas within each projection. The fracture reveals internal costae (arrow) and the fossa. Fig. 231: Oblique internal view of a specimen with attached fractured valvocopula. A cross-section through the fossa is indicated by the arrow. Fig. 232: Detail of the distal part of a projection in a specimen with attached valvocopula (VC). Note the poorly defined pseudocellus indicated by the arrow. Fig. 233: Detail of a fractured projection revealing the clasping devices on the valvocoupla holding the remnants of internal costae (arrow). Fig. 234: Internal oblique view of a partly dissolved valve, showing clasping devices of the valvocopula (VC) attached to the internal costae (black arrows). Note the single row of poroids on the valvocopula (white arrow), adjacent to the fossa. Fig. 235: Detail of the valve interior, showing the large clasping device attached to the prominent costae along the margin of the central area (arrow).	2015-05-26	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.		Zenodo	biologists	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.			
ED69878E097DFB21FF2FFCDCFD2F2096.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/13637932/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13637932	FIGURES 236–238. Light micrographs showing the range of morphological variation in Trilamina wittiana. Fig. 236: BM36216, Java, Indonesia (label reads: ‘Reinhold sample AY-12’). Fig. 237: BM63802, Java, Indonesia. Fig. 238: BM63801, Jérémie, Haiti.	FIGURES 236–238. Light micrographs showing the range of morphological variation in Trilamina wittiana. Fig. 236: BM36216, Java, Indonesia (label reads: ‘Reinhold sample AY-12’). Fig. 237: BM63802, Java, Indonesia. Fig. 238: BM63801, Jérémie, Haiti.	2015-05-26	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.		Zenodo	biologists	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.			
ED69878E097DFB21FF2FFCDCFD2F2096.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://zenodo.org/record/13637938/files/figure.png	https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13637938	FIGURES 249–252. Light micrographs of some of the new combinations proposed in this study. Fig. 249: BM63779, Trilamina tripes, Joe’s River, Barbadoes. Fig. 250: BM2763, Trilamina denticulata, Cambridge, Barbadoes, holotype. Slide thickness prevents Köhler illumination. Fig. 251: BM2111, Trilamina rotundata, Barbadoes, holotype. Slide thickness prevents Köhler illumination. Fig. 252: BM3078, Trilamina obesa, Cambridge, Barbadoes, holotype.	FIGURES 249–252. Light micrographs of some of the new combinations proposed in this study. Fig. 249: BM63779, Trilamina tripes, Joe’s River, Barbadoes. Fig. 250: BM2763, Trilamina denticulata, Cambridge, Barbadoes, holotype. Slide thickness prevents Köhler illumination. Fig. 251: BM2111, Trilamina rotundata, Barbadoes, holotype. Slide thickness prevents Köhler illumination. Fig. 252: BM3078, Trilamina obesa, Cambridge, Barbadoes, holotype.	2015-05-26	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.		Zenodo	biologists	Witkowski, Jakub;Sims, Patricia A.;Strelnikova, Nina I.;Williams, David M.			
