taxonID	type	format	identifier	references	title	description	created	creator	contributor	publisher	audience	source	license	rightsHolder	datasetID
8CC568BCB3BA76D2F830CB38F9B670D8.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/164833	https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.60.20091.figure10	Figure 10. Single most-parsimonious tree (raw length = 1622, ci = 0.20, ri = 0.63), of 101 sub / genera of Mutillidae and 4 outgroups, males only, 140 characters many additive and all with implied weighting (N = 5, k = 71). Group support (GC) values shown for all groups supported by resampling. Terminals in bold are those whose placements differ by more than mere taxonomic level in the classifications of DB and LN (see Appendix 1).	Figure 10. Single most-parsimonious tree (raw length = 1622, ci = 0.20, ri = 0.63), of 101 sub / genera of Mutillidae and 4 outgroups, males only, 140 characters many additive and all with implied weighting (N = 5, k = 71). Group support (GC) values shown for all groups supported by resampling. Terminals in bold are those whose placements differ by more than mere taxonomic level in the classifications of DB and LN (see Appendix 1).	2017-10-30	Brothers, Denis J.;Lelej, Arkady S.		Zenodo	biologists	Brothers, Denis J.;Lelej, Arkady S.			
8CC568BCB3BA76D2F830CB38F9B670D8.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/164830	https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.60.20091.figure7	Figure 7. Single most-parsimonious tree (raw length = 3822, ci = 0.14, ri = 0.75), of 101 sub / genera of Mutillidae and 4 outgroups (but each duplicated and recoded so as to reflect maximal character-state differences for polymorphisms, and taxa retained as monophyletic collapsed in the figure, see text), both sexes, 230 characters many additive and all with implied weighting (N = 5, k = 169). Group support (GC) values shown for all groups supported by resampling. Names in bold are of " terminals " shown not to be monophyletic.	Figure 7. Single most-parsimonious tree (raw length = 3822, ci = 0.14, ri = 0.75), of 101 sub / genera of Mutillidae and 4 outgroups (but each duplicated and recoded so as to reflect maximal character-state differences for polymorphisms, and taxa retained as monophyletic collapsed in the figure, see text), both sexes, 230 characters many additive and all with implied weighting (N = 5, k = 169). Group support (GC) values shown for all groups supported by resampling. Names in bold are of " terminals " shown not to be monophyletic.	2017-10-30	Brothers, Denis J.;Lelej, Arkady S.		Zenodo	biologists	Brothers, Denis J.;Lelej, Arkady S.			
8CC568BCB3BA76D2F830CB38F9B670D8.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/164831	https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.60.20091.figure8	Figure 8. Single most-parsimonious tree (raw length = 2024, ci = 0.21, ri = 0.63), of 101 sub / genera of Mutillidae and 4 outgroups both sexes, 198 characters (32 of the original 230 deleted, those found to be polymorphic in at least 10 % of terminals) many additive and all with implied weighting (N = 5, k = 81). Group support (GC) values shown for all groups supported by resampling. Terminals in bold are those whose placements differ by more than mere taxonomic level in the classifications of DB and LN (see Appendix 1).	Figure 8. Single most-parsimonious tree (raw length = 2024, ci = 0.21, ri = 0.63), of 101 sub / genera of Mutillidae and 4 outgroups both sexes, 198 characters (32 of the original 230 deleted, those found to be polymorphic in at least 10 % of terminals) many additive and all with implied weighting (N = 5, k = 81). Group support (GC) values shown for all groups supported by resampling. Terminals in bold are those whose placements differ by more than mere taxonomic level in the classifications of DB and LN (see Appendix 1).	2017-10-30	Brothers, Denis J.;Lelej, Arkady S.		Zenodo	biologists	Brothers, Denis J.;Lelej, Arkady S.			
8CC568BCB3BA76D2F830CB38F9B670D8.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/164836	https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.60.20091.figure13	Figure 13. Tree based on preferred tree (see Fig. 5) but with branches re-arranged to make the potential recognizable groups (see Fig. 12) monophyletic (length = 2858, ci = 0.19, ri = 0.60). Group support (GC) values shown for all groups supported by resampling; the highest values obtained when resampling all non-additive or mostly additive characters, using equal weights and implied weights (N = 5), are shown. Terminals in bold are those whose placements differ by more than mere taxonomic level in the classifications of DB and LN (see Appendix 1).	Figure 13. Tree based on preferred tree (see Fig. 5) but with branches re-arranged to make the potential recognizable groups (see Fig. 12) monophyletic (length = 2858, ci = 0.19, ri = 0.60). Group support (GC) values shown for all groups supported by resampling; the highest values obtained when resampling all non-additive or mostly additive characters, using equal weights and implied weights (N = 5), are shown. Terminals in bold are those whose placements differ by more than mere taxonomic level in the classifications of DB and LN (see Appendix 1).	2017-10-30	Brothers, Denis J.;Lelej, Arkady S.		Zenodo	biologists	Brothers, Denis J.;Lelej, Arkady S.			
8CC568BCB3BA76D2F830CB38F9B670D8.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/164828	https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.60.20091.figure5	Figure 5. Single most-parsimonious tree (raw length = 2828, ci = 0.19, ri = 0.61), of 101 sub / genera of Mutillidae and 4 outgroups, both sexes, 230 characters many additive and all with implied weighting (N = 5, k = 81). Group support (GC) values shown for all groups supported by resampling. Terminals in bold are those whose placements differ by more than mere taxonomic level in the classifications of DB and LN (see Appendix 1).	Figure 5. Single most-parsimonious tree (raw length = 2828, ci = 0.19, ri = 0.61), of 101 sub / genera of Mutillidae and 4 outgroups, both sexes, 230 characters many additive and all with implied weighting (N = 5, k = 81). Group support (GC) values shown for all groups supported by resampling. Terminals in bold are those whose placements differ by more than mere taxonomic level in the classifications of DB and LN (see Appendix 1).	2017-10-30	Brothers, Denis J.;Lelej, Arkady S.		Zenodo	biologists	Brothers, Denis J.;Lelej, Arkady S.			
EFF42DA8582CE04B4467DB0AAB8E0D4C.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/164834	https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.60.20091.figure11	Figure 11. Preferred most-parsimonious tree (see Fig. 5) showing distribution of characters (upper numbers) and states (lower numbers) optimized as in Appendix 2. Asterisks (*) indicate character states unambiguously placed (position not changing under any optimization). Solid hashmarks indicate unique state changes, and open hashmarks are homoplasies. Letters within boxes indicate breaks in branches to enable effective layout. [continued over 5 pages]	Figure 11. Preferred most-parsimonious tree (see Fig. 5) showing distribution of characters (upper numbers) and states (lower numbers) optimized as in Appendix 2. Asterisks (*) indicate character states unambiguously placed (position not changing under any optimization). Solid hashmarks indicate unique state changes, and open hashmarks are homoplasies. Letters within boxes indicate breaks in branches to enable effective layout. [continued over 5 pages]	2017-10-30	Brothers, Denis J.;Lelej, Arkady S.		Zenodo	biologists	Brothers, Denis J.;Lelej, Arkady S.			
ED1E6DE01F1FD83001FB11053948C341.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/164831	https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.60.20091.figure8	Figure 8. Single most-parsimonious tree (raw length = 2024, ci = 0.21, ri = 0.63), of 101 sub / genera of Mutillidae and 4 outgroups both sexes, 198 characters (32 of the original 230 deleted, those found to be polymorphic in at least 10 % of terminals) many additive and all with implied weighting (N = 5, k = 81). Group support (GC) values shown for all groups supported by resampling. Terminals in bold are those whose placements differ by more than mere taxonomic level in the classifications of DB and LN (see Appendix 1).	Figure 8. Single most-parsimonious tree (raw length = 2024, ci = 0.21, ri = 0.63), of 101 sub / genera of Mutillidae and 4 outgroups both sexes, 198 characters (32 of the original 230 deleted, those found to be polymorphic in at least 10 % of terminals) many additive and all with implied weighting (N = 5, k = 81). Group support (GC) values shown for all groups supported by resampling. Terminals in bold are those whose placements differ by more than mere taxonomic level in the classifications of DB and LN (see Appendix 1).	2017-10-30	Brothers, Denis J.;Lelej, Arkady S.		Zenodo	biologists	Brothers, Denis J.;Lelej, Arkady S.			
ED1E6DE01F1FD83001FB11053948C341.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/164833	https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.60.20091.figure10	Figure 10. Single most-parsimonious tree (raw length = 1622, ci = 0.20, ri = 0.63), of 101 sub / genera of Mutillidae and 4 outgroups, males only, 140 characters many additive and all with implied weighting (N = 5, k = 71). Group support (GC) values shown for all groups supported by resampling. Terminals in bold are those whose placements differ by more than mere taxonomic level in the classifications of DB and LN (see Appendix 1).	Figure 10. Single most-parsimonious tree (raw length = 1622, ci = 0.20, ri = 0.63), of 101 sub / genera of Mutillidae and 4 outgroups, males only, 140 characters many additive and all with implied weighting (N = 5, k = 71). Group support (GC) values shown for all groups supported by resampling. Terminals in bold are those whose placements differ by more than mere taxonomic level in the classifications of DB and LN (see Appendix 1).	2017-10-30	Brothers, Denis J.;Lelej, Arkady S.		Zenodo	biologists	Brothers, Denis J.;Lelej, Arkady S.			
ED1E6DE01F1FD83001FB11053948C341.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/164832	https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.60.20091.figure9	Figure 9. Single most-parsimonious tree (raw length = 1134, ci = 0.19, ri = 0.61), of 101 sub / genera of Mutillidae and 4 outgroups, females only, 97 characters many additive and all with implied weighting (N = 5, k = 81). Group support (GC) values shown for all groups supported by resampling. Terminals in bold are those whose placements differ by more than mere taxonomic level in the classifications of DB and LN (see Appendix 1).	Figure 9. Single most-parsimonious tree (raw length = 1134, ci = 0.19, ri = 0.61), of 101 sub / genera of Mutillidae and 4 outgroups, females only, 97 characters many additive and all with implied weighting (N = 5, k = 81). Group support (GC) values shown for all groups supported by resampling. Terminals in bold are those whose placements differ by more than mere taxonomic level in the classifications of DB and LN (see Appendix 1).	2017-10-30	Brothers, Denis J.;Lelej, Arkady S.		Zenodo	biologists	Brothers, Denis J.;Lelej, Arkady S.			
ED1E6DE01F1FD83001FB11053948C341.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/StillImage	image/png	https://binary.pensoft.net/fig/164836	https://doi.org/10.3897/jhr.60.20091.figure13	Figure 13. Tree based on preferred tree (see Fig. 5) but with branches re-arranged to make the potential recognizable groups (see Fig. 12) monophyletic (length = 2858, ci = 0.19, ri = 0.60). Group support (GC) values shown for all groups supported by resampling; the highest values obtained when resampling all non-additive or mostly additive characters, using equal weights and implied weights (N = 5), are shown. Terminals in bold are those whose placements differ by more than mere taxonomic level in the classifications of DB and LN (see Appendix 1).	Figure 13. Tree based on preferred tree (see Fig. 5) but with branches re-arranged to make the potential recognizable groups (see Fig. 12) monophyletic (length = 2858, ci = 0.19, ri = 0.60). Group support (GC) values shown for all groups supported by resampling; the highest values obtained when resampling all non-additive or mostly additive characters, using equal weights and implied weights (N = 5), are shown. Terminals in bold are those whose placements differ by more than mere taxonomic level in the classifications of DB and LN (see Appendix 1).	2017-10-30	Brothers, Denis J.;Lelej, Arkady S.		Zenodo	biologists	Brothers, Denis J.;Lelej, Arkady S.			
