identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
F5408789FFB90163FF550DF5A802E8AD.text	F5408789FFB90163FF550DF5A802E8AD.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Boophis baetkei	<div><p>Boophis baetkei sp. n.</p><p>Holotype. ZSM 2051/2007 (field number FGZC 1391), adult male, from Forêt d'Ambre Special Reserve, 12°28'00'' S, 49°13'37'' E, 470 m above sea level, Antsiranana Province, northern Madagascar, collected on 12 March 2007 by P. Bora, F. Glaw and J. Köhler.</p><p>Paratype. ZSM 1638/2008 (field number FGZC 1874), adult male, same locality as holotype, collected on 27 February 2008 by N. D'Cruze, F. Glaw and J. Köhler.</p><p>Remark. The holotype was figured as Boophis sp. aff. rappiodes by Glaw &amp; Vences (2007: page 446).</p><p>Diagnosis. A member of the Boophis ulftunni species group (sensu Wollenberg et al. 2008). Boophis baetkei is distinguished from other species groups containing green species as follows. From members of the B. albilabris and B. microtympanum species groups, the new species differs by green dorsal colouration with translucent shade in life (versus opaque green) and smaller size. It mainly differs from all species in the B. rappiodes and B. mandraka groups by a pigmented ventral side (versus inner organs visible through transparent ventral skin). Boophis baetkei differs from all species of the B. albipunctatus and B. luteus groups by advertisement call (see below), colouration in life and lack of lateral dermal fringes along lower arm and tarsus. From the other two species in the B. ulftunni group, B. baetkei differs as follows: From B. ulftunni by the lack of reddish brown markings and flecks on mid-dorsum and between eyes, silvery grey iris with brown spots and reticulation (versus bicoloured iris with outer golden-yellow ring and inner purple ring), more extensive webbing between toes, larger adult male size (30.8 versus 21–24 mm SVL), and differences in the advertisement call (see below). From B. lilianae (described below) by presence of distinct patches of vomerine odontophores, relatively larger tympanum, rounded snout in dorsal view (versus mucronate) and larger adult male size (30.8 versus 18.3 mm SVL). Furthermore, B. baetkei differs strongly from all the species contained in the mentioned groups by molecular characters.</p><p>Description of the holotype. Adult male, SVL 30.8 mm. Body slender; head slightly wider than long, wider than body; snout rounded in dorsal view, obtuse in lateral view, nostrils directed laterally, nearer to tip of snout than to eye; canthus rostralis rounded, loreal region slightly concave; tympanum distinct, rounded, TD 43% of ED; supratympanic fold distinct; tongue removed for tissue sample; vomerine odontophores distinct, well separated in two round patches, positioned posteromedian to choanae; choanae medium-sized, rounded. Arms slender, subarticular tubercles single, round; metacarpal tubercles not recognizable; fingers with basal webbing and lateral dermal fringes; webbing formula 1(1.5), 2i (1.5), 2e(1), 3i (2), 3e(1.5), 4(0.5); relative length of fingers 1&lt;2&lt;4&lt;3; finger discs moderately enlarged; distinct, medium-sized nuptial pad on inner side of first finger, unpigmented. Hindlimbs slender; tibiotarsal articulation reaching nostril when hindlimb is adpressed along body; lateral metatarsalia separated by webbing; inner metatarsal tubercle distinct, elongated; no outer metatarsal tubercle; webbing between toes well developed, lateral dermal fringes present; webbing formula 1(0.5), 2i (0.75), 2e(0.25), 3i (1), 3e(0), 4i (1), 4e(1), 5(0); relative length of toes 1&lt;2&lt;5=3&lt;4; toe discs small, only slightly enlarged. Skin smooth on dorsal surfaces, very finely granular on throat, smooth on chest, coarsely granular on belly, glandular around cloacal opening; no distinct enlarged tubercles in the cloacal region.</p><p>Measurements (in mm): SVL 30.8, HW 11.1, HL 10.6, ED 3.7, END 2.7, NSD 1.9, NND 2.8, TD 1.6, TL 17.1, HAL 9.3, FOL 13.5, FOTL 23.1.</p><p>After six months in preservative, ground colour of flanks, dorsal and ventral surfaces creamy yellow. Upper surface of head, dorsum, flanks and upper surfaces of limbs covered by regularly scattered small pink spots, most distinct on posterior dorsum. A continuous pink stripe running from the tip of snout along the canthus rostralis (above nostrils) to the upper eyelid and continuing as a supratympanal and dorsolateral stripe which fades at the urostyle. Inner margin of upper eyelid with irregular brown fleck. Nostril bordered with black dorsally. Irregular pink flecks on heel and knee, the first having half the size of the latter.</p><p>In life, ground colour of upper surface of head, dorsum and flanks translucent green. Small regularly scattered reddish to purplish dots on dorsum, flanks and upper surfaces of limbs. A continuous pinkish golden stripe running from the tip of snout along the canthus rostralis (above nostrils) to the upper eyelid and continues as a supratympanal and dorsolateral stripe which fades at midbody. The pinkish golden stripe on canthus, upper eyelid and above the tympanum is bordered by a dark red line anteriorly and by red spots posteriorly. This red line and the spots become purplish dorsolaterally posterior to tympanum. Upper edge of nostril bordered with fine black line. Pinkish golden flecks encircled by reddish brown line present on heel and knee, the first having half the size of the latter. Dorsal surfaces of fingers and toes yellowish green, terminal discs green. Ventral surfaces of limbs translucent bluish green, chest translucent turquoise green, throat translucent yellowish green. Belly white. Webbing yellowish green. Bones bluish green. Iris silvery grey with fine brown spotting and reticulation. Posterior iris periphery black, followed by light blue. Eye periphery black dorsally (Fig. 1).</p><p>Variation. Measurements (in mm) of the male paratype are as follows: SVL 30.0, HW 10.7, HL 11.5, ED 3.9, END 2.6, NSD 1.8, NND 3.1, TD 2.0, TL 16.6, HAL 9.1, FOL 13.4, FOTL 21.9. After ten days in preservative, very fine red spotting evenly distributed on dorsal surfaces, more distinct when compared to holotype. In life, pinkish golden stripe running from the tip of snout along the canthus rostralis to the upper eyelid and continues as a supratympanal stripe, fading posterior to tympanum, not continuing as dorsolateral stripe as in the holotype (Fig. 2A). Pinkish golden fleck on heel very small, that on knee distinctly smaller and less distinct compared to the holotype. Females are unknown.</p><p>Molecular differentiation. A 16S rRNA sequence (517 bp) of the holotype of B. baetkei has been deposited in Genbank (accession number EU314954). This sequence had an uncorrected sequence divergence of 5.9% (30 substitutions) as compared to B. ulftunni .</p><p>Vocalization. The advertisement call of Boophis baetkei (recorded from the holotype at an air temperature of ca. 24°C) consists of a series of strongly pulsed notes repeated in regular intervals (Fig. 2 B). Temporal and spectral call parameters are as follows: call duration, 1026–1963 msec (1565 ± 341); number of notes per call, 8–13 (10.83 ± 1.72); note duration, 58–88 msec (70.13 ± 7.97); note repetition rate within calls, 6.41–7.11 notes/sec (6.92 ± 0.34); number of pulses per note, 9–15 (10.75 ± 1.71); pulse repetition rate within notes, 133–241 pulses/sec (189.17 ± 40.91); maximum call energy at 3108–3910 Hz (3573 ± 248); dominant frequency range approximately 2800–4600 Hz. Calls are repeated at a rate of approximately 11 calls/minute. Amplitude of notes is increasing towards the end of the call. Terminal pulses within notes are sometimes clustered and partly fused. When less motivated, males may emit single notes only in irregular intervals.</p><p>In comparison, calls of B. ulftunni are composed of a single pulsed note only, exhibiting much longer intervals between pulses. Consequently, note duration is much longer in B. ulftunni when compared to B. baetkei, but overall call duration is significantly shorter. Furthermore, with 5247–6413 Hz, maximum call energy in B. ulftunni calls is higher pitched (see Wollenberg et al. 2008).</p><p>Distribution and natural history. Only known from the type locality. Both type specimens were collected at night in heavily disturbed transitional forest (that could also be characterized as relatively dry rainforest) at the edge of the Forêt d'Ambre Special Reserve. The small patch of forest was encircled by an artificial irrigation channel, not containing any water at the time of collection in 2007, and by a stream (width ca. 3-4 m, maximum depth ca. 0.5 m) at one side which might be used for breeding (tadpoles are unknown). Several males of B. baetkei were heard calling at night from trees and bushes along the edge of this stream in 2007 and 2008. Lowest calling position of males was at approximately two metres height (i.e. of the type specimens), but most males were calling from far higher positions in trees which were not accessible and prevented further collection. Boophis baetkei occurs in syntopy with B. septentrionalis and B. brachychir . The stream contained large numbers of individuals of the threatened endemic fish Pachypanchax sakaramyi in 2007, but only few in 2008 (at considerably lower water level).</p><p>Etymology. We are pleased to dedicate this species to Claus Bätke (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Technische Zusammenarbeit – GTZ). Acting as leader of the "Tropenökologisches Begleitprogramm" (TÖB) his personal efforts were crucial for the establishment of BIOPAT in 1999. Therewith, he decisively contributed to the support of biodiversity research and nature conservation in tropical countries, including Madagascar.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/F5408789FFB90163FF550DF5A802E8AD	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Köhler, Jörn;Glaw, Frank;Vences, Miguel	Köhler, Jörn, Glaw, Frank, Vences, Miguel (2008): Two additional treefrogs of the Boophis ulftunni species group (Anura: Mantellidae) discovered in rainforests of northern and south-eastern Madagascar. Zootaxa 1814: 37-48, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.182843
F5408789FFBD016FFF550A4FAC84E825.text	F5408789FFBD016FFF550A4FAC84E825.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Boophis lilianae	<div><p>Boophis lilianae sp. n.</p><p>Holotype. ZSM 201/2006 (field number ZCMV 2864), adult male, from km 6 on road Ifanadiana–Tolongoina, 21°21'21'' S, 47°36'47'' E, 468 m above sea level, Fianarantsoa Province, Southern Central East of Madagascar, collected on 22 February 2006 by L. Raharivololoniaina.</p><p>Paratype. ZSM 202/2006 (field number ZCMV 2865), adult female, same data as holotype.</p><p>Remark. This species was referred to as Boophis sp. aff. rappiodes "South" by Glaw &amp; Vences (2007: pages 174-175).</p><p>Diagnosis. A species of the B. ulftunni species group (sensu Wollenberg et al. 2008). Boophis lilianae is so far the smallest known species in the genus. It is distinguished from other species groups of Boophis containing green species as follows. From members of the B. albilabris and B. microtympanum species groups, the new species differs by green dorsal colouration with translucent shade in life (versus opaque green) and much smaller size. It mainly differs from all species in the B. rappiodes and B. mandraka groups by a pigmented ventral side (versus inner organs visible through transparent ventral skin) and smaller size. Boophis lilianae differs from all species of the B. albipunctatus and B. luteus groups by smaller size and lack of lateral dermal fringes along lower arm and tarsus. Furthermore, B. lilianae strongly differs from all the species contained in the mentioned groups by molecular characters. From the other two species in the B. ulftunni group, B. lilianae mainly differs as follows: From B. ulftunni by smaller size (SVL 18.3 versus 21-24 mm in males, 20 versus 32–38 mm in females), iris colouration (inner iris ring silvery grey versus purple) and mucronate snout shape in males. From B. baetkei by smaller adult male size (30.8 versus 18.3 mm SVL), mucronate male snout shape in dorsal view (versus rounded) and a relatively smaller tympanum. Boophis lilianae furthermore differs from B. baetkei and B. ulftunni by the lack of prominent vomerine odontophores.</p><p>Description of the holotype. Adult male, SVL 18.3 mm. Body slender; head as wide as long, wider than body; snout mucronate in dorsal view, obtuse in lateral view; nostrils directed laterally, distinctly protruding, as close to tip of snout as to eye; canthus rostralis rounded, loreal region slightly concave; tympanum distinct, rounded, TD 30% of ED; supratympanic fold weak; tongue narrowly cordiform, posteriorly distinctly bifurcated and half free; vomerine odontophores not evident; choanae small, rounded. Arms slender, subarticular tubercles small, single, round, weakly developed; metacarpal tubercles not recognizable; fingers with basal webbing and lateral dermal fringes; webbing formula 1(1), 2i (2), 2e(1), 3i (2), 3e(1.5), 4(1); relative length of fingers 1&lt;2&lt;4&lt;3; finger discs moderately enlarged; distinct, medium-sized nuptial pad on inner side of first finger, unpigmented. Hindlimbs slender; tibiotarsal articulation reaching snout tip when hindlimb is adpressed along body; lateral metatarsalia separated by webbing; inner metatarsal tubercle distinct, elongated; no outer metatarsal tubercle; webbing between toes well-developed, lateral dermal fringes present; webbing formula 1(1), 2i (1), 2e(0.25), 3i (2), 3e(0), 4i (0.75), 4e(0.75), 5(0.5); relative length of toes 1&lt;2&lt;5=3&lt;4; toe discs moderately enlarged. Skin smooth on dorsal surface with widely scattered minute tubercles, smooth on throat and chest, coarsely granular on belly, glandular around cloacal opening; no distinct enlarged tubercles in the cloacal region.</p><p>Measurements (in mm): SVL 18.3, HW 6.5, HL 6.5, ED 2.7, END 1.0, NSD 1.0, NND 1.9, TD 0.8, TL 9.4, HAL 5.4, FOL 7.0, FOTL 12.2.</p><p>After nineteen months in preservative, ground colour of flanks, dorsal and ventral surfaces creamy yellow. A pink canthal stripe running from tip of snout to upper eyelid. Nostril encircled by thin brown line. Upper eyelid covered by brown blotch, bordered by pink spot posteriorly. Triangular brown fleck between eyes, its tip directed posteriorly. Thin pink supratympanal line continuing as thin dorsolateral line, fading at level of urostyle. Two fine longitudinal parallel stripes on mid-dorsum formed by rows of pink spots, extending from behind scapular region to level of sacral vertebra. Few minute pink spots irregularly scattered on dorsum. Small pink fleck on knee.</p><p>In life, ground colour of upper surface of head, dorsum and flanks translucent yellowish green, slightly transparent in groin. A reddish canthal stripe running from tip of snout to upper eyelid. Thin reddish supratympanic line continuing as fine red dorsolateral line and fading at level of urostyle. Upper eyelid covered by reddish brown blotch. Weak brownish triangular fleck between eyes, its tip directed posteriorly. Two fine longitudinal parallel stripes on mid-dorsum formed by rows of reddish to pink spots, extending from behind scapular region to level of urostyle. Between these stripes, some irregular pink marbling on mid-dorsum. Few minute irregularly scattered reddish brown spots on dorsum. Irregular reddish brown spots on heel and knee. Dorsal surfaces of fingers, toes and terminal discs yellowish green. Ventral surfaces of limbs, chest and posterior half of throat translucent turquoise green, anterior half of throat translucent yellowish green. Belly white with a turquoise shade. Bones green. Inner iris silvery grey, with a fine brownish circular line. Outer iris golden yellowish, with a black triangular fleck median above and below pupil, respectively. Posterior iris periphery black, followed by light blue (Fig. 3).</p><p>Variation. Measurements (in mm) of the female paratype are as follows: SVL 20.0, HW 7.2, HL 7.1, ED 2.7, END 1.5, NSD 1.3, NND 1.9, TD 1.0, TL 11.0, HAL 5.8, FOL 8.3, FOTL 13.6. The snout is rather truncate in dorsal view in the paratype, compared to the distinctly mucronate shape in the holotype. In preservative, the paratype exhibits more extensive pink colour on dorsum, formed by several irregular blotches and flecks on mid-dorsum. The pink dorsolateral lines are partly interrupted, generally wider and more irregular in outline. The brown flecks on upper eyelids contain a layer of pink colour. Two distinctly separated pink middorsal spots are present posteriorly to the triangular brown fleck between eyes. In life, the red dorsolateral stripes are bordered by bold silvery white blotches. Minute white spots are scattered on dorsal surfaces of limbs. The skin in groin and posterior dorsum is almost completely transparent (Fig. 4A). Tentatively judging from the two available specimens, a difference of only 8.5% in the SVL between the adult male and adult female, sexual dimorphism in body size is less pronounced than usually observed in species of green Boophis (see Fig. 4 B).</p><p>Molecular differentiation. A 16S rRNA sequence (462 bp) of the holotype of B. lilianae has been deposited in Genbank (accession number EU314953). This sequence had an uncorrected sequence divergence of 8.7% (40 substitutions) as compared to the holotype of B. baetkei, and of 10.0% (46 substitutions) to B. ulftunni .</p><p>Distribution and natural history. So far only collected from the type locality. The two type specimens were collected at night in amplexus. They were sitting on low vegetation in a swampy area formed by a slowly moving stream that flooded large parts of a small patch of dense palm forest next to highly degraded rainforest. The female contains yellowish eggs (each approximately 1.6 mm in diameter) in its oviducts as visible through the transparent skin on flanks, indicating that reproduction was taking place at the time of collecting (during the rainy season). Boophis lilianae occurs in sympatry with B. madagascariensis, B. opisthodon, and B. pyrrhus . Despite intensive searches at the type locality, on the same day the amplecting specimens were collected, and on at least 5 other occasions, no further specimens could be found and no calls potentially assignable to this species were heard. In 2007, we collected, at the type locality, tadpoles assignable to this species which will be described elsewhere. One further pair in amplexus, tentatively assignable to this species, has been observed and photographed by A. Strauß and J. Glos on 22 January 2008 at a site locally known as Imaloka in the Ranomafana National Park (21°14’32’’ S, 47°27’55’’ E, approximately 900-1000 m a.s.l.). The specimens were sitting about 1.5 m high on leaves of a shrub above a small, rather slow moving stream with sandy substrate. According to our observations, B. lilianae may either be very secretive or seasonal in its calling behaviour.</p><p>Etymology. This species is dedicated to Liliane Raharivololoniaina who collected the two type specimens, in recognition of her contribution to the study of Madagascan amphibians and her continuous help during our field expeditions. The terminal "e" in "Liliane" has intentionally been omitted in the species name for easier pronunciation.</p></div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/F5408789FFBD016FFF550A4FAC84E825	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		MagnoliaPress via Plazi	Köhler, Jörn;Glaw, Frank;Vences, Miguel	Köhler, Jörn, Glaw, Frank, Vences, Miguel (2008): Two additional treefrogs of the Boophis ulftunni species group (Anura: Mantellidae) discovered in rainforests of northern and south-eastern Madagascar. Zootaxa 1814: 37-48, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.182843
