identifier	taxonID	type	CVterm	format	language	title	description	additionalInformationURL	UsageTerms	rights	Owner	contributor	creator	bibliographicCitation
F97F87A2FFD5FFC9FF7ECAECFE2D2ED9.text	F97F87A2FFD5FFC9FF7ECAECFE2D2ED9.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Arachnomyces jinanicus B. D. Sun Y. G. Zhou & A. J. Chen 2019	<div><p>Arachnomyces jinanicus B.D. Sun Y.G. Zhou &amp; A.J. Chen, sp. nov. Fig. 2–3</p> <p>MycoBank: MB821133</p> <p>Etymology: The specific epithet “jinanicus ” referring to the place where the fungus was first isolated.</p> <p>Diagnosis. Colonies 25 oC 21 d on OAT 10–13 mm diam, PDA 11–15 mm diam, SAB 10–14 mm diam (Fig. 2). Aerial mycelium on OAT sparsely developed and colonies were flat and white; on PDA and SAB sparse or produced moderately, gradually increasing in height and becoming wrinkled, reaching heights of 3–5 mm, colonies yellowishwhite or yellowish-grey, reverse dark brown or olive-brown and without any diffusing pigment.</p> <p>Sporulation occurred slowly, poor on OAT and SAB, moderate on PDA. Vegetative hyphae hyaline, 1.0–2.5 μm wide, septate, smooth or finely verrucose, anastomosis was common, usually by direct fusion of adjacent hyphae or by producing thin lateral hyphal pegs (Fig. 3L). Fertile hyphae scarcely differentiated, initially septate without constriction at the septa, with individual cells swelling and becoming constricted at the septa. Arthroconidia formed randomly in intercalary positions or in basipetal order on lateral branches; broadly ellipsoidal, cylindrical, nearly spherical or irregularly shaped, 0–1 septate, often persisted in branched or unbranched chains, smooth to minutely-warty, hyaline to pale-yellow, (2.3–) 3.0–4.5 (–6.0) × 2.0–3.5 μm (0-septate), (4.5–) 5.0–7.0 (–8.5) × 2.5–3.5 μm (1-septate). Setae (brown hyphae) developed after 12 weeks’ incubation, 2.0–5.0 μm in width, bearing irregular, raised, darker brown knobs (Fig. 3A–D), with the apical regions straight. Sclerotia absent.</p> <p>Holotype: — CHINA. Shandong province: <a href="https://tb.plazi.org/GgServer/search?materialsCitation.longitude=116.74389&amp;materialsCitation.latitude=36.5375" title="Search Plazi for locations around (long 116.74389/lat 36.5375)">Jinan</a> city, 36°32’15” N 116°44’38” E, pig farm soil, 12 July 2011, B.D. Sun (HMAS 247193, holotype); ex-type living culture CGMCC 3.14173. GenBank accession numbers ITS: KY440749; 28S: KY440752.</p> <p>Habitat. pig farm soil.</p> <p>Known distribution. China.</p> <p>Notes: The three A. jinanicus strains were crossed in all possible combinations and these crossings didn’t result in ascomata. Phylogenetically, A. jinanicus and A. nodosetosus clustered together and are sister species. The two species have a similar micromorphology, both of them have well developed anamorphic stages and chained arthroconidia, produce strongly nodose setae in cultures after prolonged incubation (12 weeks). The difference was that the setal tips of A. jinanicus were straight while those of A. nodosetosus were circinate or loosely coiled (Sigler &amp; Congly 1990, Gibas et al. 2002a). In addition, the arthroconidia of A. nodosetosus are larger, up to 17 μm in length and 6.5 μm in width (Sigler &amp; Congly 1990).</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/F97F87A2FFD5FFC9FF7ECAECFE2D2ED9	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Sun, Bing-Da;Zhou, Yu-Guang;Chen, Amanda-Juan;Houbraken, Jos	Sun, Bing-Da, Zhou, Yu-Guang, Chen, Amanda-Juan, Houbraken, Jos (2019): Phylogeny and a new species of the genus Arachnomyces (Arachnomycetaceae). Phytotaxa 394 (1): 89-97, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.394.1.6, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.394.1.6
F97F87A2FFD4FFC9FF7ECF92FF122A05.text	F97F87A2FFD4FFC9FF7ECF92FF122A05.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Arachnomyces pilosus (Sun, Houbraken et A. J. Chen 2019) Sun, Houbraken et A. J. Chen 2019	<div><p>Arachnomyces pilosus (Guarro, Gene &amp; Ulfig) Sun, Houbraken et A.J. Chen comb. nov.</p> <p>MycoBank MB 822107</p> <p>Basionym: Chrysosporium pilosum Gene, Guarro &amp; Ulfig, 1994. Mycotaxon 50: 108.</p> <p>Notes: Chrysosporium pilosum was characterized by a restricted growth on agar media and the production of conidia on deflected short protrusions. This type of conidiogenesis is not observed in other Arachnomyces species. The most striking feature of this species was, as already noted by Gene et al. (1994), the production of brown, thick-walled hyphae. They reported that similar structures were also produced by Onychocola canadensis, a species currently classified in Arachnomyces. As reported by Sigler et al. (1994), these brown hyphae were actually setae because they could arise from the vegetative hyphae in the absence of ascomata. Based on our phylogenetic analyses, this species can be best classified in Arachnomyces and it is most closely related to A. gracilis. Arachnomyces gracilis can be differentiated from A. pilosus by the production of ascomata and alternate arthroconidia, which are not observed in A. pilosus.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/F97F87A2FFD4FFC9FF7ECF92FF122A05	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Sun, Bing-Da;Zhou, Yu-Guang;Chen, Amanda-Juan;Houbraken, Jos	Sun, Bing-Da, Zhou, Yu-Guang, Chen, Amanda-Juan, Houbraken, Jos (2019): Phylogeny and a new species of the genus Arachnomyces (Arachnomycetaceae). Phytotaxa 394 (1): 89-97, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.394.1.6, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.394.1.6
F97F87A2FFD4FFC9FF7EC9AEFD38280D.text	F97F87A2FFD4FFC9FF7EC9AEFD38280D.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Arachnomyces scleroticus (Sun, Houbraken et A. J. Chen 2019) Sun, Houbraken et A. J. Chen 2019	<div><p>Arachnomyces scleroticus (Guarro, Gene &amp; De Vrovey) Sun, Houbraken et A.J. Chen comb. nov.</p> <p>MycoBank: MB 821136</p> <p>Basionym: Malbranchea sclerotica Guarro, Gene &amp; De Vroey, 1993. Mycotaxon 48: 471.</p> <p>Synonym: Onychocola sclerotica (Guarro, Gené &amp; De Vroey) Gibas, Sigler et Currah, 2002. Studies in Mycology 47: 135.</p> <p>Notes: Malbranchea sclerotica was first reported as an anamorphic fungus, which produces numerous sclerotia and curved, cylindrical arthroconidia (Guarro et al. 1993). In their phylogeny using partial small subunit region (SSU) sequences, this species was included in the Arachnomyces clade and it was transferred into the genus Onychocola as O. sclerotica (Gibas et al. 2002a). Although Gibas et al. (2002a) succeeded in inducing it to produce ascospores, they didn’t give an Arachnomyces name for this species. Based on the “one fungus, one name” provision and the priority principle, Arachnomyces has priority over Onychocola.</p> </div>	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/F97F87A2FFD4FFC9FF7EC9AEFD38280D	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Sun, Bing-Da;Zhou, Yu-Guang;Chen, Amanda-Juan;Houbraken, Jos	Sun, Bing-Da, Zhou, Yu-Guang, Chen, Amanda-Juan, Houbraken, Jos (2019): Phylogeny and a new species of the genus Arachnomyces (Arachnomycetaceae). Phytotaxa 394 (1): 89-97, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.394.1.6, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.394.1.6
F97F87A2FFD7FFCBFF7ECCC6FA672C85.text	F97F87A2FFD7FFCBFF7ECCC6FA672C85.taxon	http://purl.org/dc/dcmitype/Text	http://rs.tdwg.org/ontology/voc/SPMInfoItems#GeneralDescription	text/html	en	Arachnomyces	<div><p>Key to species of Arachnomyces</p> <p>1. Ascomata produced homothallically; arthroconidial anamorph present or absent............................................................................2</p> <p>1’ Ascocarp not produced or produced in mated cultures; arthroconidial anamorph present................................................................6</p> <p>2. Setae coiled or circinate; anamorph absent or unknown....................................................................................................................3</p> <p>2’ Setae straight and tapered; anamorph of alternate arthroconidia........................................................................................ A. gracilis</p> <p>3. Setae slightly nodose; ascospores mostly &lt;3.5 μm long...................................................................................................................4</p> <p>3’ Setae smooth; ascospores mostly&gt; 3.5μm long.................................................................................................................................5</p> <p>4. Ascospores are smooth....................................................................................................................................................... A. minimus</p> <p>4’ Ascospores are echinulate............................................................................................................................................. A. peruvianus</p> <p>5. Ascomata 100–300 μm diam................................................................................................................................................ A. nitidus 5’ Ascomata 500–700 μm diam.......................................................................................................................................... A. sulphureus</p> <p>6. Arthroconidia alternate, cylindrical to irregularly swollen................................................................................................................7</p> <p>6’ Arthroconidia regularly swollen, in persistent chains......................................................................................................................10</p> <p>7. Alternate arthroconidia cylindrical or barrel shaped, sclerotia present..............................................................................................8</p> <p>7’ Alternate arthroconidia subglobose to pyriform, sclerotia absent......................................................................................................9</p> <p>8. Colonies becoming greyish brown, growth is strongly inhibited at 35 oC........................................................................ A. glareosus</p> <p>8’ Colonies white to pale brown, growth is not inhibited at 35 oC...................................................................................... A. scleroticus</p> <p>9. Arthroconidia smooth to finely asperulate, setae smooth to slightly nodose.......................................................................... A. kanei</p> <p>9’ Matured arthroconidia coarsely verrucose, setae strongly nodose....................................................................................... A. pilosus</p> <p>10. Setae strongly nodose, tip circinate or loosely coiled.................................................................................................. A. nodosetosus</p> <p>10’ Setae strongly nodose, tip straight..................................................................................................................................... A. jinanicus</p></div> 	https://treatment.plazi.org/id/F97F87A2FFD7FFCBFF7ECCC6FA672C85	Public Domain	No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.		Plazi	Sun, Bing-Da;Zhou, Yu-Guang;Chen, Amanda-Juan;Houbraken, Jos	Sun, Bing-Da, Zhou, Yu-Guang, Chen, Amanda-Juan, Houbraken, Jos (2019): Phylogeny and a new species of the genus Arachnomyces (Arachnomycetaceae). Phytotaxa 394 (1): 89-97, DOI: 10.11646/phytotaxa.394.1.6, URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.394.1.6
