Atheta concessa Casey, 1911a

(Figs. 85–89 in Klimaszewski & Winchester 2002)

Atheta (Lamiota) concessa Casey, 1911a: 83 .

Atheta (s. str.) sumpta Casey, 1911a: 92, syn. nov.

Atheta (Liogluta) concessa: Fenyes, 1920: 209 (as valid species).

Atheta (s. str.) sumpta: Fenyes, 1920: 214 (as valid species).

Atheta (Liogluta) concessa: Bernhauer & Scheerpeltz, 1926: 656 (as valid species).

Atheta (s. str.) sumpta: Bernhauer & Scheerpeltz, 1926: 650 (as valid species).

Atheta (Liogluta) concessa: Moore & Legner, 1975: 357 (as valid species).

Atheta (s. str.) sumpta: Moore & Legner, 1975: 375 (as valid species).

Lamiota concessa: Seevers, 1978: 263 (as valid species).

Xenota sumpta: Seevers, 1978: 271 (as valid species).

Atheta (Lamiota) concessa: Klimaszewski & Winchester, 2002: 35 (as valid species).

Type material. Lectotype of Atheta concessa (here designated): ♂, “Metlakatla, B.[ritish] Col.[umbia] Keen”, “ concessa Csy. ”, “TYPE USNM 39483” (red label), “CASEY bequest 1925” (NMNH) . Paralectotypes: 2♂♂, 2♀♀, “Metlakatla, B.[ritish] Col.[umbia] Keen”, “ concessa PARATYPE USNM 39483” (red label), “CASEY bequest 1925” (NMNH) .

Holotype of Atheta sumpta: ♀, “Metlakatla, B.[ritish] Col.[umbia] Keen”, “ sumpta Csy. ”, “TYPE USNM 39249” (red label), “CASEY bequest 1925” (NMNH). (NMNH).

Diagnosis. See Klimaszewski & Winchester 2002.

Discussion. The holotype of At. sumpta is similar to the types of At. concessa in external characters. The spermatheca is identical in the female paralectotypes of At. concessa and the holotype of At. sumpta .

Distribution. Atheta concessa is known only from British Columbia.