Buenoa fuscipennis (Berg)

Fig. 23–26

Anisops fuscipennis (Berg, 1879): 76 [Type locality: Argentina; Type in Museo de La Plata (Argentina)].

Anisops naias Kirkaldy, 1899: 194 [Synonymy; Type locality: Viña del Mar, Chile; Types in Perth Museum (Scotland) and Kirkaldy G.W. Collection].

Buenoa fuscipennis: Kirkaldy (1904): 120 [New combination; Note: Argentina]; Kirkaldy and Torre-Bueno (1909): 200 [Note: Argentina]; Truxal (1953): 1460 [Revision; Distribution and records: Brazil, Bolivia, Chile, Paraguay, Uruguay, Argentina]; Ruffinelli and Pirán (1959): 47 [Survey: Uruguay]; Bachmann (1962): 24 [Record: Delta del Paraná (Argentina)]; Bachmann (1963): 36 [Survey: Rio Colorado (Argentina)]; Nieser (1968): 131 [Record: Argentina]; Nieser (1970): 84 [Survey: South America; Record: Argentina]; Bachmann (1971): 604 [Record: Argentina]; Heckman (1998a): 254 [Survey: Pantanal (Brazil)]; Heckman (1998b): 39 [Survey: Pantanal (Brazil)]; Fischer et al. (2000): 48 [seasonal dynamics, Buenos Aires (Argentina)]; Estévez et al. (2003): 371 [Survey: Esteros del Iberá (Argentina)]; Herrera Millán (2005): 118 [Survey: Venezuela]; Fernández and López-Ruf (2006): 143 [Survey: Berisso (Argentina)]; Mazzucconi et al. (2008): 61 [Note: Argentina]; Torres et al. (2008): 135 [Survey: Parque Nacional Calilegua (Argentina)]; Konopko et al. (2009): 275 [Survey: Parque Provincial Ernesto Tornquist (Argentina)]; Heckman (2011): 484 [Key to Buenoa of South America]; Melo et al. (2011): 5 [Survey: Chaco National Park (Argentina)]; Moreira et al. (2011): 54 [Check-list of Brazil].

Buenoa naias: Kirkaldy (1904): 120 [Synonymy; Note: Chile, Venezuela, Argentina]; Kirkaldy and Torre-Bueno (1909): 200 [Note: Venezuela, Chile, Argentina]; De Carlo (1935): 110 [Note: Chile, Argentina, Venezuela].

Buenoa dentipes: Jaczewski (1928): 127 [Synonymy; Type localities: Brazil, Paraná, Rio Claro, Serra da Esperança; São Domingo; Invernadinha; Vermelho; Types were in Warsaw Museum (Poland)9].

Comments. This species is very distinct from others that occur in the region. The rostral prong is short and strongly rounded at apex, resembling superficially that of B. incompta (Fig. 27), although the rostral prong of B. fuscipennis is more robust and shorter than the third rostral segment (Fig. 23).The rostral prong is slender and a little longer than the third rostral segment in B. incompta .

Material. BRAZIL: Estado do Pará, Município de Canaã dos Carajás, FLONA de Carajás, Serra Sul, Lagoa S11D-F [6.399131ºS / 50.371536ºW], 17.XI.2010 (P. Marinho & A.P.F. Pires), det. J. F. Barbosa: 16 m and 3 f macropterous (DZRJ); 20.IV.2011 (R. L. Bozelli & P. Marinho): 5 m macropterous (DZRJ).