Neocoenyra BIOCULATA Carcasson, 1964

Journal of the East Africa Natural History Society & Coryndon Museum 24 (4), 67-72 [68-69], figs. 1-2. Combination still valid (see Ackery, Smith & Vane-Wright, 1995.

Paratypes, 1 male, 1 female, without abdomens, pinned (ex Gifford collection).

[ Mycalesis COOKSONI H. Druce, in H. Druce & H.H. Druce, 1905

Transactions of the Entomological Society of London for 1905, 251–263 [251], plate XIII, figure 1. Current accepted combination: Bicyclus cooksoni (H.Druce, in H. Druce & H.H. Druce, 1905) (see Ackery, Smith & Vane- Wright, 1995).

Specimens, 2 females, pinned (one mounted underside uppermost). Specimen data: Specimen reg. no.31; “ 8/5/ 04 ”[Handwritten in pencil]. “N.W.R.” [Handwritten in ink]. “ Rhodesia | Cookson | 1930-202 31.” “CO-TYPE” [Handwritten in ink on mauve card]. Specimen reg. no.32; “ 8/6/04 ” [Handwritten in pencil]. “ Rhodesia Cookson 1930-202 32.” “CO-TYPE” [Handwritten in ink on mauve card]. “ Mycalesis cooksoni Druce ” [Handwritten in ink]. Remarks: This species was described based on an unstated number of males.These females cannot be part of the type series, unless there was an error in the original sexing.]

Mycalesis HAROLDI H. Druce, in H. Druce & H.H. Druce, 1905

Transactions of the Entomological Society of London for 1905, 251–263 [252], plate XIII, figure 2.

Junior subjective synonym of Brakefieldia centralis (Aurivillius, 1903) (see Aduse-Poku et al., 2016).

Syntypes, 2 males, pinned. Specimen data: Specimen reg. no.39: “ 25/4/04 ” [Handwritten in pencil].”N.W.R.”[Handwritten in ink]. “ Rhodesia / Cookson / 1930-202 / 39” [Printed]. “CO-TYPE” [Handwritten in ink on mauve card]. Specimen reg. no.40: “ 25/3/04 ” [Handwritten in pencil]. “NWR” [Handwritten in ink]. “ Rhodesia / Cookson / 1930-202 40” [Printed]. “CO-TYPE” [Handwritten in ink on mauve card]. “Mycalecis [sic]/ haroldi / Druce” [Handwritten in ink]. Remarks: These two male specimens were collected by Harold Cookson in northwest Rhodesia (the type locality) in 1904. Hamilton Druce’s description is based on a male type but he implies he had other specimens before him. These are some of those specimens labelled “co-types” and can be considered as syntypes .