Adesmus divus (Chabrillac, 1857)

(Fig. 60)

Hemilophus divus Chabrillac, 1857: 200 .

Amphionycha diva; Bates, 1881: 303.

Adesmus divus; Aurivillius, 1923: 589.

Amphionycha procera Gahan, 1889: 399 .

Adesmus procerus; Aurivillius, 1923: 590

Remarks. Hemilophus divus was described based on a single specimen from Brazil. Chabrillac (1857) did not specify the sex of the holotype. According to Tavakilian & Chevillotte (2023) and Monné (2024b), the holotype is a female. Gahan (1889) described Amphionycha procera based on a single specimen from south Brazil. Martins & Galileo (1993) synonymized A. procerus with A. divus . Currently, it is known from Colombia, Brazil (Mato Grosso, Goiás, Distrito Federal, Maranhão, Minas Gerais, Espírito Santo, Rio de Janeiro, São Paulo, Paraná, and Rio Grande do Sul), French Guiana, Bolivia (Santa Cruz), Paraguay, and Argentina (Misiones) (Monné 2024b; Tavakilian & Chevillotte 2023).

Material examined. BRAZIL, Mato Grosso do Sul (new state record): Campo Grande, Pioneiros, Universidade Federal de Mato Grosso do Sul, Reserva Particular do Patrimônio Natural, 20°30’39.0”S 54°36’56.0”W, 556 m, 1 specimen (ZUFMS-COL-00582), 12.XII.2013, E.E. Lima leg. (ZUFMS) .